Proximal tibiofibular joint instability in multiligamentous injury of the knee.

We present a case of a man in his 40s with a proximal tibiofibular joint dislocation, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear and posterolateral corner (PLC) injury sustained after a cycling accident. Physical examination and MRI confirmed the diagnosis. He was treated with reconstruction of the ACL, PLC and proximal tibiofibular joint. Postoperative treatment included physical therapy to improve knee range of motion and full weight-bearing after 6 weeks. He was able to return to full activities including completing a marathon after 1 year. Identifying proximal tibiofibular joint instability is essential in patients with multiligamentous knee injury as it is often missed. The use of a single tunnel for PLC and proximal tibiofibular joint reconstruction can reduce risk of tunnel convergence.

Single-Center Long-Term Results of Popliteal Artery Blunt Trauma Management Following Knee Dislocation - A Case Series Study.

BACKGROUND: Injury to the popliteal artery after knee dislocation, if not promptly diagnosed and properly treated, can have devastating results. The purpose of this retrospective study was to describe the diagnostic and the treatment protocol we use, as well as provide long-term outcomes for a series of patients treated in our tertiary hospital, emphasizing on the importance of ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurement as an integral component of the diagnostic approach. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all admissions to our hospital trauma center between November 1996 and July 2023, with a diagnosis of knee dislocation and the presence or absence of concomitant arterial injury resulting from blunt high-energy trauma, was conducted. Before 2006, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and/or computed tomography angiography (CTA) were part of the diagnostic approach (group A). After 2006, the ABI was used as a first-line test to diagnose arterial damage (group B). The Tegner and Lysholm scores were chosen to assess patients' postoperative impairment between groups, taking also into account the presence or absence of vascular injury. The Mann-Whitney U test and a univariate analysis of variance were used for the statistical analysis of scores. RESULTS: Overall, 55 patients were identified, and 21 of them (38.2%) had injuries to the popliteal artery, all of which were treated with a reversed great saphenous venous bypass. Out of the 21 patients, 4 (4.3%) developed compartment syndrome, which was treated with fasciotomies, and 1 leg (1.8%) was amputated above the knee. With no patients lost to follow-up, all but one (95%) of the vascular repairs are still patent, and the limbs show no signs of ischemia after a mean follow-up of 6 years. The Tegner and Lysholm score means were similar between groups A and B and independent of the presence of vascular injury and the diagnostic protocol used. Interestingly, an ABI below 0.9 proved to be predictive of arterial injury. CONCLUSIONS: A high level of awareness for the presence of popliteal artery injury should exist and an ABI measurement should be routinely performed in the management of all cases of knee dislocation. This way, fewer patients will undergo unnecessary CTA scanning, and hardly any popliteal artery injuries can go missing, as suggested by our study.

Knee dislocations and associated fractures: risk factors for surgical reduction.

INTRODUCTION: Dissociation of the knee joint, or knee dislocations (KD), can lead to severe complications, often resulting in multiligament injuries. A subset of these injuries are irreducible by closed reduction and require open reduction. Identifying KDs that necessitate surgical intervention is crucial for optimal outcomes. While previous studies have explored various risk factors, the influence of associated fractures is less understood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database from 2017 to 2021, for non-congenital closed knee dislocations requiring surgery. Demographic variables were collected, and ICD-10 codes were used to identify associated tibia, femur, acetabular, and fibula fractures. ICD-10 codes were also used to identify nerve injuries and vascular injuries. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess factors influencing the need for surgical reduction (SR). RESULTS: A total of 1,467 patients with KDs were included in the study, of which 411 (28.0%) underwent open surgical reduction (SR) while 1,056 (72.0%) were treated with nonsurgical closed reduction (nSR). Factors associated with SR included concomitant tibia fracture (OR = 1.683, C.I: 1.255-2.256, p < 0.001) and fibula fracture (OR = 1.457, C.I: 1.056-2.011, p = 0.022). Vascular injury had lower odds of SR (OR = 0.455, C.I: 0.292-0.708, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that KDs presenting with concomitant tibia and/or fibula fractures are more likely to require SR. The difficulty posed to closed reduction may be due to the influence of these fracture patterns on surrounding soft tissue as well as the lack of a stable bone structure necessary for achieving proper reduction. Physicians should be aware of the potential risk of this fracture pattern when caring for patients with KDs.

Frailty is a predictor of immediate postoperative complications following surgical management of knee dislocations.

PURPOSE: To assess the utility of frailty in predicting outcomes following surgical intervention for KDs. METHODS: The NIS database was queried for non-congenital knee dislocations from 2015 to 2019 that underwent ligament repair or surgical reduction. Patients were assigned frailty scores using the mFI-11, and outcomes were compared. Multivariate regression and ROC curve analysis were used to assess the independent association of obesity, frailty, VI, and age with adverse outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 3797 patients who underwent surgical management were included. Frailty was associated with extended LOS (OR 1.353, 95% CI 1.212-1.510, p < 0.001), adverse discharge (OR 1.716, 95% CI 1.515-1.946, p < 0.001), and complications (OR 1.449, 95% CI 1.352-1.553, p < 0.001). Severely frailty was associated with extended LOS (OR 1.838, 95% CI 1.611-2.097, p < 0.001), adverse discharge (OR 2.756, 95% CI 2.394-3.171, p < 0.001), and complications (OR 1.603, 95% CI 1.453-1.768, p < 0.001). Additionally, VI was a risk factor for extended LOS (OR 7.647 (6.442-9.076) p < 0.001), complications (OR 2.065 (1.810-2.341) p < 0.001), and adverse discharge (OR 1.825 (1.606-2.075), p < 0.001). Obesity was a risk factor for extended LOS (OR 1.599 (1.470-1.739), p < 0.001) and complications (OR 1.235 (1.108-1.377), p < 0.001). AUC analysis showed that frailty was the most accurate predictor of all outcomes when compared to VI, obesity, and age. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is superior to age and obesity, and comparable to VI, at predicting adverse outcomes following surgical management of KDs. These findings suggest that frailty assessment might play a role in risk stratification and preoperative planning for KD patients that require surgical intervention.

Long-term Outcomes of Surgically Treated Congenital Dislocation of the Knee.

BACKGROUND: Congenital dislocation of the knee (CDK) may be idiopathic or associated with another condition, such as Larsen syndrome or arthrogryposis. Surgical reduction of type-3 dislocation may require quadricepsplasty (QP) or femoral diaphyseal shortening (FS). Because it is unknown which treatment is more effective, we evaluated long-term outcomes using patient-reported questionnaires and gait analysis, comparing results by surgery type and underlying diagnosis. METHODS: Twelve patients (mean age, 19 mo) were treated surgically for CDK from 1985 to 2015 and studied 9 to 30 years postoperatively. Three participants had idiopathic CDK, 5 had Larsen syndrome, and 4 had arthrogryposis. Eleven knees underwent QP and 7 underwent FS. Participants were evaluated in our movement science laboratory and completed patient-reported outcome questionnaires. Data were compared with healthy, age-matched control values at the same visit. RESULTS: Surgically treated knees had less flexion during swing ( P <0.01), less overall motion ( P <0.01), greater coronal instability ( P <0.04), and slower gait ( P <0.01) compared with controls. QP knees had more instability in midstance ( P =0.03) and less flexion during gait compared with FS knees, less sagittal power generation than controls ( P <0.01), and trended toward lower scores on Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome and Lysholm Knee Questionnaires than FS patients did. The idiopathic group had the gait most similar to that of controls, followed by the Larsen syndrome group and then the arthrogryposis group. The idiopathic group also had a better UCLA Activity Score ( P =0.03) than the arthrogryposis group did. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of type-3 CDK will not likely restore normal knee function, suggesting teratologic joint abnormality. In this small series, FS produced better gait mechanics and patient-reported outcomes compared with QP. Not surprisingly, patients with idiopathic CDK had better outcomes than those with a syndromic diagnosis, likely related to having only a single joint affected. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Congenital dislocation of the knee complicated with bilateral hip dislocation: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Congenital dislocation of the knee is characterised by excessive knee extension or dislocation and anterior subluxation of the proximal tibia, and this disease can occur independently or coexist with different systemic syndromes. Nevertheless, significant controversy surrounds treating this disease when combined with hip dislocation. This paper presents a case of a 4-month-old patient diagnosed with bilateral hip dislocation combined with this disease. The study discusses the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment methods and reviews relevant literature. CASE PRESENTATION: We reported a case of a 4-month-old female infant with congenital dislocation of the right knee joint, which presented as flexion deformity since birth. Due to limitations in local medical conditions, she did not receive proper and effective diagnosis and treatment. Although the flexion deformity of her right knee joint partially improved without treatment, it did not fully recover to normal. When she was 4 months old, she came to our hospital for consultation, and we found that she also had congenital dislocation of both hip joints and atrial septal defect. We performed staged treatment for her, with the first stage involving surgical intervention and plaster orthosis for her congenital dislocation of the right knee joint, and the second stage involving closed reduction and plaster fixation orthosis for her congenital hip joint dislocation. Currently, the overall treatment outcome is satisfactory, and she is still under follow-up observation. CONCLUSIONS: Early initiation of treatment is generally advised, as nonsurgical methods prove satisfactory for mild cases. However, surgical intervention should be considered in cases with severe stiffness, unresponsive outcomes to conservative treatment, persistent deformities, or diagnoses and treatments occurring beyond the first month after birth.

Successful Management of Impending Skin Necrosis After a Posterolateral Knee Dislocation.

Incarcerated medial soft tissue after posterolateral knee dislocations has been described, but limited information pertaining to the etiology and management of cutaneous injuries from incarceration exists. We present the case of a 64-year-old man, where reduction of a posterolateral knee dislocation resulted in incarceration of medial ligamentous structures and impending skin necrosis. The patient avoided full-thickness skin necrosis, which could have complicated treatment options. Careful consideration of the soft-tissue envelope of the knee for preventing additional skin injury in the perioperative period should be considered to potentially avert additional necrosis in patients with a 'pucker' sign after knee dislocations.

Knee dislocations with vascular injuries - a review article.

Knee dislocations are complex and devastating injuries that are potentially limb threatening. A high level of suspicion is required to diagnose and treat these injuries properly and timely because some of the knee dislocations spontaneously reduce, and the seriousness of the injury might not be appreciated early. Early diagnosis of concomitant vascular injuries is imperative to avoid limb loss because the risk of amputation is high when diagnosis and timely intervention are delayed. It is recommended that serial ankle-brachial index (ABI) be performed in all patients with suspected knee dislocation. This is particularly important in fracture dislocations, high-energy trauma, morbidly obese patients, lateral sided injuries, concomitant peroneal nerve injuries and fracture in the ipsilateral limb because these were demonstrated to be associated with a high risk of concomitant vascular injuries in knee dislocations. In cases where serial ABI cannot be performed, in high-risk patients and ABI less-than 0.9, a CT angiography should be performed.

Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Documented Knee Dislocation Versus Multiligamentous Knee Injury: A Comparison of KD3 Injuries at Mean 6.5 Years Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has found that the incidence of neurovascular injury is greatest among multiligamentous knee injuries (MLKIs) with documented knee dislocation (KD). However, it is unknown whether there is a comparative difference in functional recovery based on evidence of a true dislocation. PURPOSE: To determine whether the knee dislocation-3 (KD3) injury pattern of MLKI with documented tibiofemoral dislocation represents a more severe injury than KD3 MLKI without documented dislocation, as manifested by poorer clinical outcomes at long-term follow-up. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed of patients who underwent surgical treatment for KD3 MLKI between May 2012 and February 2021. Outcomes were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Documented dislocation was defined as a radiographically confirmed tibiofemoral disarticulation, the equivalent radiology report from outside transfer, or emergency department documentation of a knee reduction maneuver. Subgroup analysis was performed comparing lateral (KD3-L) versus medial (KD3-M) injuries. Multivariable linear regression was conducted to determine whether documented dislocation was predictive of outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients (25 male, 17 female) were assessed at a mean 6.5-year follow-up (range, 2.1-10.7 years). Twenty patients (47.6%) were found to have a documented KD; they reported significantly lower IKDC (49.9 vs 63.0; P = .043), Lysholm (59.8 vs 74.5; P = .023), and Tegner activity level (2.9 vs 4.7; P = .027) scores than the patients without documented dislocation. VAS pain was not significantly different between groups (36.4 vs 33.5; P = .269). The incidence of neurovascular injury was greater among those with documented dislocation (45.0% vs 13.6%; P = .040). Subgroup analysis found that patients with KD3-L injuries experienced a greater deficit in Tegner activity level than patients with KD3-M injuries (Δ: -3.4 vs -1.2; P = .006) and had an increased incidence of neurovascular injury (41.7% vs 11.1%; P = .042). Documented dislocation status was predictive of poorer IKDC (ß = -2.15; P = .038) and Lysholm (ß = -2.85; P = .007) scores. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing surgical management of KD3 injuries with true, documented KD had significantly worse clinical and functional outcomes than those with nondislocated joints at a mean 6.5-year follow-up. The current MLKI classification based solely on ligament involvement may be obscuring outcome research by not accounting for true dislocation.

Magnetic resonance imaging quality in the context of a knee-spanning external fixator placed inside the MR bore: a literature review.

After emergent assessment of potentially limb-threatening injuries in knee dislocation or multi-ligament knee injury patients, magnetic resonance imaging is necessary to visualize ligamentous structures and plan for soft tissue repair. However, the application of a knee-spanning external fixator may introduce artifact and reduce overall image quality, which can limit the evaluation of soft tissue injury. As a result, the utility of MRI in the context of a knee-spanning external fixator has been called into question. Signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and qualitative scales have been used to assess image quality of MRI in the context of a knee-spanning external fixator. Despite the potential for artifact, studies have demonstrated that useful diagnostic information may be obtained from MRI in the presence of an external fixator. This review examines the general principles of anatomical assessment, magnetic field strength, device composition and design, radiofrequency coil use, and MRI sequences and artifact reduction as they pertain to MRI in the presence of a knee-spanning external fixator.

[Treatment of acute knee dislocations]. / Behandlung der akuten Knieluxation.

A knee dislocation is a serious injury involving at least two of the four major ligamentous stabilizers of the knee. This injury results in multidirectional knee instability. In dislocation of the knee the popliteal artery and the peroneal nerve can also be damaged. Dislocations with vascular involvement are potentially threatening injuries of the lower extremities. The diagnosis of knee dislocation can be difficult due to a high rate of spontaneous reduction at the initial examination. Knee dislocations are rare and mainly occur in young men. They are mostly caused by high-energy trauma; however, they can also be caused by low-energy injuries. Obesity increases the risk of knee dislocations. The classification of a knee dislocation is based on the anatomical structures involved and the direction of dislocation. The acute treatment includes reduction and stabilization measures. Associated injuries, such as vascular, nerve, extensor mechanism and cartilage injuries as well as fractures and meniscal injuries can influence the treatment approach and the outcome. The definitive surgical treatment depends on the severity of the injury and can include ligament reconstruction or repair with bracing. The aftercare should be individually adapted with the aim to restore knee joint stability and function. Complications such as arthrofibrosis, peroneal nerve palsy, compartment syndrome, postoperative infection and recurrent instability can occur. In the long term, patients have an increased risk for the development of symptomatic osteoarthritis.

Irreducible knee dislocation: improved clinical outcomes of open and arthroscopic surgical treatment. A systematic review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Irreducible knee dislocations (IKDs) are a rare rotatory category of knee dislocations (KDs) characterized by medial soft tissue entrapment that requires early surgical treatment. This systematic review underlines the need for prompt surgical reduction of IKDs, either open or arthroscopically. It describes the various surgical options for ligament management following knee reduction, and it investigates their respective functional outcome scores to assist orthopedic surgeons in adequately managing this rare but harmful KD. METHODS: A comprehensive search in four databases, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and MEDLINE, was performed, and following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Studies with LoE 5 were excluded, and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the ROBINS-I tool system. This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed for all data extracted. RESULTS: Four studies were included in the qualitative analysis for a total of 49 patients enrolled. The dimple sign was present in most cases. The surgical reduction, either open or arthroscopically performed, appeared to be the only way to disengage the entrapped medial structures. After the reduction, torn ligaments were addressed in a single acute or a double-staged procedure with improved functional outcome scores and ROM. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review underlines the importance of promptly reducing IKDs through a surgical procedure, either open or arthroscopically. Moreover, torn ligaments should be handled with either a single acute or a double-staged procedure, leading to improved outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Multiligament knee injuries. Ten years' experience at a public university, level I Trauma Center.

PURPOSE: To describe our institutional experience and results in the surgical management of multiligament knee injuries (MLKI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective series of MLKI consecutively operated on at a single, level I Trauma Center. Data on patients' baseline characteristics, injuries, treatments, and outcomes were recorded up to one-year follow-up. Recorded outcomes included the Tegner-Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (TLKSS), return to work, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: MLKI incidence was 0.03% among 9897 orthopedic trauma admissions. Twenty-four patients of mean age 43.6 years were included in analysis. The mean Injury Severity Score was 12.6. Five patients presented with knee dislocations and six had fracture-dislocations, two of them open fractures. There was one popliteal artery injury requiring a bypass and four common peroneal nerve palsies. Staged ligamental reconstruction was performed in all cases. There were seven postoperative complications. The median TLKSS was 80 and, though patient satisfaction was high, and dissatisfaction was largely restricted to recreational activities (only 58.3% satisfied). Seventeen patients returned to their previous employment. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high aggregation of fracture-dislocations secondary to road traffic accidents. One in four patients experienced complications, particularly stiffness. Complications were more common in cases involving knee dislocation. Most patients had good functional results, but 25% were unable to return to their previous work, which demonstrates the long-lasting sequelae of this injury.

Two-stage ligament reconstruction with remnant preservation as treatment of knee dislocation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of two-stage reconstruction (peripheral reconstruction in phase I and central anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) / posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction in phase II) with remnant preservation for patients with knee dislocation. METHODS: A total of 70 patients (10 IIIM, 17 IIIL, and 43 IV) with knee dislocation were randomly divided into the remnant-preserved group and the simple reconstruction group. Patients underwent two-stage reconstruction, including the reconstruction of collateral ligament in phase I and the reconstruction of ACL/PCL in phase II (12 weeks after phase I). Grafts were harvested from the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons from both lower limbs. After the surgery, the joint flexion and extension, bone tunnel and ligament healing, and joint stability were evaluated. RESULTS: After the surgery, the lateral stability recovered in all patients, and X-ray revealed a good position of bone tunnel. Follow-up was performed at 12 months postoperatively and ranged from 24 to 91 months. At the final follow-up, knee flexion angle, IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner scores were all higher in both groups compared to the preoperative period. Notably, the remnant-preserved group showed superior results in these parameters compared to the simple reconstruction group. There was statistical significance between the two groups in terms of the Lachman test. CONCLUSION: The knee function was well recovered after two-stage ligament reconstruction with remnant preservation.

Higher success rate observed in reconstruction techniques of acute posterolateral corner knee injuries as compared to repair: an updated systematic review.

PURPOSE: There remains controversy regarding the optimal surgical treatment for acute complete (grade III) posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries. The purpose of this article is to systematically review the contemporary literature regarding surgical options and subsequent outcomes of acute grade III PLC injuries. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using the following search terms: posterolateral corner knee, posterolateral knee, posterolateral instability, multi-ligament knee, and knee dislocation. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies with level I-IV evidence, reporting on human patients with acute grade III PLC injuries undergoing operative management within 4 weeks from injury, with subjective and/or objective outcomes (including varus stress examinations or varus stress radiographs) reported at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Two investigators independently performed the search by sequentially screening articles. Accepted definitions of varus stability on examination or stress radiographs and revision surgery were used to determine success and failure of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies, consisting of 288 patients were included. Ten studies reported primary repair, while reconstruction techniques were reported in seven studies. Overall, 43% (n = 125/288) of injuries involved the PLC, ACL and PCL. Staged reconstruction was reported in 25% (n = 3/12) of studies. The Lysholm score was the most commonly reported outcome measure. An overall failure rate of 12.4% (n = 35/282) was observed. Surgical failure was significantly higher in patients undergoing repair (21.9%; n = 21/96) compared to reconstruction (7.1%; n = 6/84) (p = 0.0058). Return to sport was greater in patients undergoing reconstruction (100%; n = 22/22) compared to repair (94%; n = 48/51) (n.s). The most common post-operative complication was arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia (8.7%; n = 25/288). A total of 3.8% (n = 11/288) of patients underwent revision PLC reconstruction. CONCLUSION: There remains substantial heterogeneity in the surgical techniques of acute, grade III PLC injuries with an overall failure rate of 12.4%. Failure rates were significantly lower, and return to sport rates higher in patients undergoing PLC reconstruction compared to repair. The most common postoperative complication was arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

[Multiligament instabilities of the knee in sports injuries : An update of the Hamburg concept]. / Multiligamentäre Instabilitäten des Kniegelenkes bei Sportverletzungen : Ein Update zum "Hamburger Konzept".

BACKGROUND: Knee dislocation (KD) is a rare but severe injury of the knee joint, with a high rate of concomitant neurovascular injuries. The severity of the ligamentous injury, which is classified according to the Schenck classification, the mechanism of injury, concomitant injuries and individual factors determine the treatment strategy in KD. TREATMENT STRATEGY: Furthermore, a clear differentiation between high-velocity (HV) and low-velocity (LV) injuries is necessary. Generally, surgical treatment within 7-10 days should be aspired. Herein, the one-stage hybrid treatment using augmented ligament sutures (ligament bracing) in combination with primary ligament reconstruction (posterolateral and ACL) leads to very good functional results in the mid-term. Ultra-low-velocity (ULV) dislocations and those with concomitant peroneal lesions require a modified approach, due to a limited prognosis. During rehabilitation, the individual progress must be closely monitored and follow an early functional approach. In approximately 20% of all cases, early arthroscopic arthrolysis shows a high success rate.

Supine Lobenhoffer Approach Optimizes PCL Reconstruction with Tibial Inlay in Knee Dislocations: A Case Report.

CASE: A 47-year-old man suffered a knee dislocation while skiing with associated damage to the anterior cruciate, posterior cruciate, medial collateral, and medial patellofemoral ligaments. The patient underwent a multiple-ligament knee reconstruction using the supine Lobenhoffer approach, which resulted in remarkable outcomes that persisted throughout the 56-month follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The utilization of this approach can prevent inappropriate graft tension and iatrogenic damage, reduce surgical time, and minimize airway complications by eliminating the need for the prone position. Optimizing these factors enhances the patient's chances for long-term outcomes; thus, surgeons should consider this approach in managing multiple-ligament knee injuries.

Establishing a Consensus Definition of a Knee Fracture-Dislocation (Schenck Knee Dislocation V) Using a Global Modified Delphi Method.

BACKGROUND: Knee fracture-dislocations are complex injuries; however, there is no universally accepted definition of what constitutes a fracture-dislocation within the Schenck Knee Dislocation (KD) V subcategory. The purpose of this study was to establish a more precise definition for fracture patterns included within the Schenck KD V subcategory. METHODS: A series of clinical scenarios encompassing various fracture patterns in association with a bicruciate knee ligament injury was created by a working group of 8 surgeons. Utilizing a modified Delphi technique, 46 surgeons from 18 countries and 6 continents with clinical and academic expertise in multiligamentous knee injuries undertook 3 rounds of online surveys to establish consensus. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement with responses of either "strongly agree" or "agree" for a positive consensus or "strongly disagree" or "disagree" for a negative consensus. RESULTS: There was a 100% response rate for Rounds 1 and 2 and a 96% response rate for Round 3. A total of 11 fracture patterns reached consensus for inclusion: (1) nondisplaced articular fracture of the femur; (2) displaced articular fracture of the femur; (3) tibial plateau fracture involving the weight-bearing surface (with or without tibial spine involvement); (4) tibial plateau peripheral rim compression fracture; (5) posterolateral tibial plateau compression fracture, Bernholt type IIB; (6) posterolateral tibial plateau compression fracture, Bernholt type IIIA; (7) posterolateral tibial plateau compression fracture, Bernholt type IIIB; (8) Gerdy's tubercle avulsion fracture with weight-bearing surface involvement; (9) displaced tibial tubercle fracture; (10) displaced patellar body fracture; and (11) displaced patellar inferior pole fracture. Fourteen fracture patterns reached consensus for exclusion from the definition. Two fracture patterns failed to reach consensus for either inclusion or exclusion from the definition. CONCLUSIONS: Using a modified Delphi technique, this study established consensus for specific fracture patterns to include within or exclude from the Schenck KD V subcategory. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level V . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Extensor Mechanism Disruption Impacts Treatment of Dislocated and Multiligament Injured Knees: Treatment and Schenck Classification Recommendations Based on a Global Delphi Method.

BACKGROUND: Multiligament knee injury (MLKI) with associated extensor mechanism (EM) involvement is a rare injury, with limited evidence to guide optimal treatment. The purpose of this study was to identify areas of consensus among a group of international experts regarding the treatment of patients with MLKI and concomitant EM injury. METHODS: Utilizing a classic Delphi technique, an international group of 46 surgeons from 6 continents with expertise in MLKI undertook 3 rounds of online surveys. Participants were presented with clinical scenarios involving EM disruption in association with MLKI, classified using the Schenck Knee-Dislocation (KD) Classification. Positive consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement with responses of either "strongly agree" or "agree," and negative consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement with "strongly disagree" or "disagree." RESULTS: There was a 100% response rate for rounds 1 and 2 and a 96% response rate for round 3. There was strong positive consensus (87%) that an EM injury in combination with MLKI significantly alters the treatment algorithm. For an EM injury in conjunction with a KD2, KD3M, or KD3L injury, there was positive consensus to repair the EM injury only and negative consensus regarding performing concurrent ligamentous reconstruction at the time of initial surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of bicruciate MLKI, there was overall agreement on the significant impact of EM injury on the treatment algorithm. We therefore recommend that the Schenck KD Classification be updated with the addition of the modifier suffix "-EM" to highlight this impact. Treatment of the EM injury was judged to have the highest priority, and there was consensus to treat the EM injury only. However, given the lack of clinical outcome data, treatment decisions need to be made on a case-by-case basis with consideration of the numerous clinical factors that are encountered. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Little clinical evidence exists to guide the surgeon on the management of EM injury in the setting of a multiligament injured or dislocated knee. This survey highlights the impact that EM injury has on the treatment algorithm and provides some guidance for management until a further large case series or prospective studies are undertaken.