Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: Updated examination of mechanisms, pathophysiology, treatment, and association with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is an inflammatory condition in the laryngopharynx and upper aerodigestive tract mucosa caused by reflux of stomach contents beyond the esophagus. LPRD commonly presents with sym-ptoms such as hoarseness, cough, sore throat, a feeling of throat obstruction, excessive throat mucus. This complex condition is thought to involve both reflux and reflex mechanisms, but a clear understanding of its molecular mechanisms is still lacking. Currently, there is no standardized diagnosis or treatment protocol. Therapeutic strategies for LPRD mainly include lifestyle modifications, proton pump inhibitors and endoscopic surgery. This paper seeks to provide a comprehensive overview of the existing literature regarding the mechanisms, patho-physiology and treatment of LPRD. We also provide an in-depth exploration of the association between LPRD and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Prediction of the efficacy of proton-pump inhibitors in patients with contact granuloma using 24-hour combined dual channel pH/impedance monitoring.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with contact granuloma (CG) and to investigate the parameters of 24 h combined dual channel pH/impedance (24 h pH/MII) monitoring, which are reliable for predicting the response to PPI of CG patients. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients with CG who had been treated with PPIs and had completed more than 6 months of follow-up. We classified the patients into two groups (cured vs. persistent), according to their PPI treatment outcomes. Reflux events were categorized into three groups based on pharyngeal pH during reflux: 1) acid reflux (pH < 4), 2) weak acid reflux (4 < pH < 7), and 3) weak alkaline reflux (pH >7), as detected by a proximal probe. We compared the results of 24h-pH/MII between the two groups and used receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis to determine the cutoff values of significant parameters for predicting responses to PPIs. RESULTS: Among 22 patients who completed at least 6 months of PPI treatment and follow-up, weak acid reflux events were more frequently observed in persistent group than in the cured group (p = 0.046), and the proportion of weak acid reflux was also higher in the persistent group (p = 0.031) than in the cured group. Reliable parameters predictive of a poor response to PPIs were a number of weak acid reflux events ≥ 11 (area under the curve [AUC], 0.775; p = 0.03) and a proportion of weak acid reflux events ≥ 56.7 % (AUC, 0.763; p = 0.038) in ROC analyses. CONCLUSION: Weak acid reflux was identified as a significant factor associated with the treatment outcomes of PPIs in patients with CG. A number of weak acid reflux events ≥ 11 is considered to be the most reliable predictor of a poor response to PPIs in patients with CG.

ChatGPT-4 accuracy for patient education in laryngopharyngeal reflux.

INTRODUCTION: Chatbot Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) is an artificial intelligence-powered language model chatbot able to help otolaryngologists in practice and research. The ability of ChatGPT in generating patient-centered information related to laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) was evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-five questions dedicated to definition, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of LPRD were developed from the Dubai definition and management of LPRD consensus and recent reviews. Questions about the four aforementioned categories were entered into ChatGPT-4. Four board-certified laryngologists evaluated the accuracy of ChatGPT-4 with a 5-point Likert scale. Interrater reliability was evaluated. RESULTS: The mean scores (SD) of ChatGPT-4 answers for definition, clinical presentation, additional examination, and treatments were 4.13 (0.52), 4.50 (0.72), 3.75 (0.61), and 4.18 (0.47), respectively. Experts reported high interrater reliability for sub-scores (ICC = 0.973). The lowest performances of ChatGPT-4 were on answers about the most prevalent LPR signs, the most reliable objective tool for the diagnosis (hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (HEMII-pH)), and the criteria for the diagnosis of LPR using HEMII-pH. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT-4 may provide adequate information on the definition of LPR, differences compared to GERD (gastroesophageal reflux disease), and clinical presentation. Information provided upon extra-laryngeal manifestations and HEMII-pH may need further optimization. Regarding the recent trends identifying increasing patient use of internet sources for self-education, the findings of the present study may help draw attention to ChatGPT-4's accuracy on the topic of LPR.

Pepsin-mediated inflammation in laryngopharyngeal reflux via the ROS/NLRP3/IL-1ß signaling pathway.

BACKGROUND: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is one of the most common disorders in otorhinolaryngology, affecting up to 10% of outpatients visiting otolaryngology departments. In addition, 50% of hoarseness cases are related to LPR. Pepsin reflux-induced aseptic inflammation is a major trigger of LPR; however, the underlying mechanisms are unclear. The nucleotide-binding domain and leucine-rich repeat protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome has become an important bridge between stimulation and sterile inflammation and is activated by intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) in response to danger signals, leading to an inflammatory cascade. In this study, we aimed to determine whether pepsin causes LPR-associated inflammatory injury via mediating inflammasome activation and explore the potential mechanism. METHODS: We evaluated NLRP3 inflammasome expression and ROS in the laryngeal mucosa using immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry. Laryngeal epithelial cells were exposed to pepsin and analyzed using flow cytometry, western blotting, and real-time quantitative PCR to determine ROS, NLRP3, and pro-inflammatorycytokine levels. RESULTS: Pepsin expression was positively correlated with ROS as well as caspase-1 and IL-1ß levels in laryngeal tissues. Intracellular ROS levels were elevated by increased pepsin concentrations, which were attenuated by apocynin (APO)-a ROS inhibitor-in vitro. Furthermore, pepsin significantly induced the mRNA and protein expression of thioredoxin-interacting protein, NLRP3, caspase-1, and IL-1ß in a dose-dependent manner. APO and the NLRP3 inhibitor, MCC950, inhibited NLRP3 inflammasome formation and suppressed laryngeal epithelial cell damage. CONCLUSION: Our findings verified that pepsin could regulate the NLRP3/IL-1ß signaling pathway through ROS activation and further induce inflammatory injury in LPR. Targeting the ROS/NLRP3 inflammasome signaling pathway may help treat patients with LPR disease.

Digestive Biomarkers of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Preliminary Prospective Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the digestive enzymes and biomarkers in the saliva of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and asymptomatic individuals. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective controlled study. SETTING: Multicenter study. METHODS: Patients with LPR at the hypopharyngeal-esophageal impedance-pH monitoring (HEMII-pH) and asymptomatic individuals were consecutively recruited from January 2020 to April 2023 from 2 University Hospitals. The saliva of patients (off PPIs) and asymptomatic individuals was collected to measure pH, elastase, bile salts, cholesterol, gastric, and pancreatic lipases. Anxiety, symptoms, and findings were studied through perceived stress scale (PSS), reflux symptom score (RSS), and reflux sign assessment (RSA). RESULTS: Sixty-seven LPR patients and 57 asymptomatic individuals completed the evaluations. LPR patients reported higher PSS, RSS, and RSA than asymptomatic individuals. The mean saliva pH was more alkaline in LPR patients (7.23: 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.08, 7.38) compared to controls (6.13; 95% CI: 5.95, 6.31; P = .001). The mean concentration of elastase was higher in patients (51.65 µg/mL; 95% CI: 44.47, 58.83 µg/mL) versus asymptomatic individuals (25.18 µg/mL; 95% CI: 21.64, 28.72 µg/mL; P = .001). The saliva cholesterol reported higher concentration in healthy individuals (3.43 mg/dL; 95% CI: 3.21, 3.65 mg/dL) compared to patients (1.16 mg/dL; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.27 mg/dL; P = .001). The saliva pH, and elastase concentration were significantly associated with the baseline RSS, while saliva cholesterol was negatively associated with the severity of RSS and RSA. CONCLUSION: Cholesterol, bile salts, and elastase are biomarkers of LPR and should be considered to develop future non-invasive saliva device for the detection of LPR.

Effect of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker (P-CAB) on the Microbiological Comprise of the Laryngopharynx.

OBJECTIVE: To probe the microbiota composition progressing from healthy individuals to those with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) and subsequently undergoing potassium-competitive acid inhibitor (P-CAB) therapy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case-control study. SETTING: Academic Medical Center. METHODS: Forty patients with LPRD and 51 patients without LPRD were recruited. An 8-week P-CAB therapy was initiated (post-T-LPRD), and 39 had return visits. In total, 130 laryngopharyngeal saliva samples were collected and sequenced by targeting the V3-V4 region of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene using an Illumina MiSeq. Amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) and clinical indices were analyzed. RESULTS: Alpha and beta diversities were compared among the non-LPRD, LPRD, and post-T-LPRD groups, and the Observed_ASVs were not significantly different. At the same time, the Shannon and Simpson indices, unweighted Unifrac, weighted Unifrac, and binary Jaccard distance were significantly different between non-LPRD and LPRD groups. In addition, significant differences were found in the abundance of Streptococcus, Prevotella, and Prevotellaceae in the LPRD versus non-LPRD groups, and Neisseria, Leptotrichia, and Allprevotella in the LPRD versus post-T-LPRD groups. The genera model was used to distinguish patients with LPRD from those without, and a better receiver operating characteristic curve was formed after combining the clinical indices of reflux symptom index, reflux finding score, and pepsin, with an area under the curve of 0.960. CONCLUSION: Laryngopharyngeal microbial communities changed after laryngopharyngeal reflux and were modified further after P-CAB treatment, which provides a potential diagnostic value for LPRD, especially when combined with clinical indices.

Assessing the role of dryness and burning sensation in diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is a condition characterized by the regurgitation of stomach and duodenal contents into the laryngopharynx, with variable and non-specific symptoms. Therefore, developing an accurate symptom scale for different regions is essential. Notably, the symptoms of "dryness and burning sensation in the laryngopharynx or mouth" are prevalent among the Chinese population but are often omitted from conventional symptom assessment scales, such as the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Symptom Score-12 (RSS-12) scales. To address this gap, our study incorporated the symptoms into the RSI and RSS-12 scales, developing the RSI-10/RSS-13 scales. Afterward, we assessed the role of the new scale's reliability (Cronbach's α and test-retest reliability), construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis), and diagnostic efficiency. Our study encompassed 479 participants (average = 39.5 ± 13.4 years, 242 female) and 91 (average = 34.01 ± 13.50 years, 44 female) completed 24 h MII-pH monitoring. The Cronbach's α values of 0.80 and 0.82 for the RSI-10 and RSS-13 scales, respectively. RSI-10 and RSS-13 exhibited strong test-retest reliability (ICCs = 0.82-0.96) and diagnostic efficacy (AUC = 0.84-0.85). Furthermore, the factor analysis identified the RSS-13 and its three sub-scales (ear-nose-throat, digestive tract, respiratory tract) exhibited good to excellent structural validity (χ2/df = 1.95, P < 0.01; CFI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.05). The AUC optimal thresholds for the RSI-10 and RSS-13 in the Chinese population were 13 and 36, respectively. Besides, the inclusion of the new item significantly improved the diagnostic efficiency of the RSI scale (P = 0.04), suggesting that RSI-10 holds promise as a more effective screening tool for LPRD, and global validation is needed to demonstrate the impact of this new symptom on the diagnosis of LPRD.

Is there a role for voice therapy in the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux? A pilot study.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of voice therapy combined with standard anti-reflux therapy in reducing symptoms and signs of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). Methods: A randomised clinical trial was conducted. Fifty-two patients with LPR diagnosed by 24 h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring were randomly allocated in two groups: medical treatment (MT) and medical plus voice therapy (VT). Clinical symptoms and laryngeal signs were assessed at baseline and after 3 months of treatment with the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Reflux Finding Score (RFS), Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and GRBAS scales. Results: Groups had similar scores at baseline. At 3-month follow-up, a significant decrease in RSI and RFS total scores were found in both groups although it appeared to be more robust in the VT group. G and R scores of the GRBAS scale significantly improved after treatment in both groups, with better results in the VT group. The VHI total score at 3 months improved more in the VT group (VHI delta 9.54) than in the MT group (VHI delta 5.38) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The addition of voice therapy to medications and diet appears to be more effective in improving treatment outcomes in subjects with LPR. Voice therapy warrants consideration in addition to medication and diet when treating patients with LPR.

Incidental Laryngeal Findings in Routine Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) refers to the backflow of acidic stomach content into the larynx, pharynx, and upper aerodigestive tract. The diagnosis of LPR is based on the patient's history and findings of the laryngoscopy associated with LPR. Other possible manifestations consistent with LPR symptoms include laryngeal cancer, vocal fold granulomas, Reinke's space edema, and vocal polyps. In this study, we compared the characteristics of patients with LPR symptoms and incidental laryngeal findings (ILF) in the laryngoscopic evaluation to those without ILF (WILF). OBJECTIVES: Determine the characteristics of LPR-symptomatic patients with ILF versus WILF. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we examined 160 medical charts from patients referred to the otolaryngology clinic at Galilee Medical Center for LPR evaluation 2016-2018. The reflux symptoms index (RSI), reflux finding score (RFS), and demographics of the patient were collected. All patients with a positive RSI score for LPR (RSI > 9) were included, and the profiles of patients with versus without ILF on laryngoscopy examination were compared. RESULTS: Of the 160 patients, 20 (12.5%) had ILF during laryngoscopy. Most had vocal cord findings such as leukoplakia (20%), polyps (15%), and nodules (20%). Hoarseness, throat clearing, swallowing difficulty, breathing difficulties, and total RSI score were significantly higher in patients with ILF. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of LPR symptoms may provide otolaryngologists with a tool to identify patients with other findings on fiberoptic laryngoscopy. A laryngoscopic examination should be part of the examination of every patient with LPR to enable diagnosis of incidental findings.

[Analysis of clinical characteristics of children with adenoid hypertrophy and pharyngolaryngeal reflux].

Objectives: To explore the clinical characteristics of children with adenoid hypertrophy (AH) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) by detecting the expression of pepsin in adenoids as a standard for AH with LPR. Methods: A total of 190 children who were admitted for surgical treatment due to AH were included in the study. The main clinical symptoms of the patients were recorded, and the degree of adenoid hypertrophy was evaluated. Before the surgery, Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Finding Score (RFS) were used to evaluate the reflux symptoms. After the surgery, pepsin immunohistochemical staining was performed on the adenoid tissue, and according to the staining results, the patients were divided into study group (pepsin staining positive) and control group (pepsin staining negative). SPSS 19.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Quantitative data conforming to normal distribution between the two groups were tested by two-independent sample t test, and quantitative data with skewed distribution were tested by Mann-Whitney U test. Results: The positive rate of pepsin staining in the 190 AH patients was 78.4% (149/190). The study group had higher levels of preoperative symptoms such as erythema and/or congestion of the pharynx(2.1±0.7 vs. 1.8±0.6,t=2.23), vocal cord edema[1.0(0, 1.0) vs. 1.0(0, 1.0), Z=2.00], diffuse laryngeal edema[0(0, 1.0) vs. 0(0, 0), Z=2.48], posterior commissure hypertrophy[(1.4±0.6 vs. 1.1±0.5), t=2.63], and a higher total score on the RFS scale than the control group(6.2±2.7 vs. 5.0±2.6, t=2.47), with statistical differences (P<0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of RFS score in diagnosing AH with LPR were 24.8% and 80.5%, respectively. When RFS>5 was used as the positive threshold, the sensitivity and specificity of RFS score in diagnosing AH with LPR were 61.1% and 58.5%, respectively. There was a statistical difference in the number of positive cases of RFS score between the study group and the control group(91 vs. 17,χ2=5.04,P=0.032). Conclusions: LPR is common in AH children. Children with AH and LPR have specific performance in electronic laryngoscopy, such as erythema with edema in the pharynx, posterior commissure hypertrophy, and vocal cord edema.

Review article: Diagnosis and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux.

BACKGROUND: Laryngopharyngeal reflux has classically referred to gastroesophageal reflux leading to chronic laryngeal symptoms such as throat clearing, dysphonia, cough, globus sensation, sore throat or mucus in the throat. Current lack of clear diagnostic criteria significantly impairs practitioners' ability to identify and manage laryngopharyngeal reflux. AIMS: To discuss current evidence-based diagnostic and management strategies in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux. METHODS: We selected studies primarily based on current guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease and laryngopharyngeal reflux, and through PubMed searches. RESULTS: We assess the current diagnostic modalities that can be used to determine if laryngopharyngeal reflux is the cause of a patient's laryngeal symptoms, as well as review some of the common treatments that have been used for these patients. In addition, we note that the lack of a clear diagnostic gold-standard, as well as specific diagnostic criteria, significantly limit clinicians' ability to determine adequate therapies for these patients. Finally, we identify areas of future research that are needed to better manage these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chronic laryngeal symptoms are complex due to the heterogenous nature of symptom pathology, inconsistent definitions and variable response to therapies. Further outcomes data are critically needed to help elucidate ideal diagnostic workup and therapeutic management for these challenging patients.

Trust in Machine Learning Driven Clinical Decision Support Tools Among Otolaryngologists.

BACKGROUND: Machine learning driven clinical decision support tools (ML-CDST) are on the verge of being integrated into clinical settings, including in Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery. In this study, we investigated whether such CDST may influence otolaryngologists' diagnostic judgement. METHODS: Otolaryngologists were recruited virtually across the United States for this experiment on human-AI interaction. Participants were shown 12 different video-stroboscopic exams from patients with previously diagnosed laryngopharyngeal reflux or vocal fold paresis and asked to determine the presence of disease. They were then exposed to a random diagnosis purportedly resulting from an ML-CDST and given the opportunity to revise their diagnosis. The ML-CDST output was presented with no explanation, a general explanation, or a specific explanation of its logic. The ML-CDST impact on diagnostic judgement was assessed with McNemar's test. RESULTS: Forty-five participants were recruited. When participants reported less confidence (268 observations), they were significantly (p = 0.001) more likely to change their diagnostic judgement after exposure to ML-CDST output compared to when they reported more confidence (238 observations). Participants were more likely to change their diagnostic judgement when presented with a specific explanation of the CDST logic (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that otolaryngologists are susceptible to accepting ML-CDST diagnostic recommendations, especially when less confident. Otolaryngologists' trust in ML-CDST output is increased when accompanied with a specific explanation of its logic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Laryngoscope, 134:2799-2804, 2024.

[Risk factors for the occurrence of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the aged and the clinical characteristics of patients complicated with pneumonia].

Objective: To investigate the risk factors for the occurrence of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the aged, and to analyze the characteristics of patients with pneumonia. Methods: Patients who underwent 24-hour laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring from June 2020 to July 2022 and the positive patients of those who underwent 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring from March 2017 to July 2022 at the Second Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital were enrolled retrospectively. Positive results of 24-hour laryngopharyngeal reflux monitoring were in the laryngopharyngeal reflux group, and the negative results were in the non-laryngopharyngeal reflux group. Patients with pneumonia and simple gastroesophageal reflux disease were in the esophageal reflux pneumonia group, and patients with pneumonia and simple laryngopharyngeal reflux disease were in the laryngopharyngeal reflux pneumonia group. Patients' basic data, co-morbidities, drug use and relevant examination and test results were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the aged and its relationship with pneumonia. Results: A total of 80 patients with 24-hour laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring were enrolled finally, including 34 cases, all male, aged (73±12) years, in the laryngopharyngeal reflux group, and 46 cases [44 males, 2 females, aged (78±11) years] in the non-laryngopharyngeal reflux group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the risk factors of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the aged included age ≤70 years (OR=13.07, 95%CI: 2.53-67.68), body mass index (BMI) (OR=1.37, each additional 1 kg/m2, 95%CI: 1.03-1.83), use of antipsychotic drugs (OR=8.00, 95%CI: 1.40-45.73) and calcium channel blockers (OR=5.27, 95%CI: 1.13-24.53) (all P<0.05). The protective factors of the laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the aged included antacids (OR=0.19, 95%CI: 0.04-0.90, P=0.035). The incidence of pneumonia was higher in the laryngopharyngeal reflux group compared with the non-laryngopharyngeal reflux group [44.1% (15/34) vs 21.7% (10/46), P=0.033]. The esophageal reflux pneumonia group included 32 cases [31 males and 1 females, aged (84±12) years]. The laryngopharyngeal reflux pneumonia group included 15 cases [ 15 males, aged (79±11) years]. Compared to the patients in the laryngopharyngeal reflux pneumonia group, the patients in the esophageal reflux pneumonia group had a longer course of antibiotics [(27.7±27.0) vs (14.6±13.9) days, P=0.034], a higher frequency of seizure frequency [(4.3±3.0) vs (1.8±1.5) times/year, P<0.001] and a higher maximal body temperature [(38.2±0.9) vs (37.6±1.1) ℃, P=0.037]. Conclusions: The risk factors of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the aged included age ≤70 years, higher BMI, use of antipsychotic drugs and calcium channel blockers. The incidence of pneumonia in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease is higher, but the condition of pneumonia is milder.

The Tibetan Formula Cong zhi 6 in the ORL (ENT) Practice: Experiences with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

BACKGROUND: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a frequent condition; in European countries, the prevalence can be estimated as 10-30% of the general population. Treatment includes lifestyle measures and highly dosed proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) over at least 4 weeks. However, PPIs are not unproblematic due to their potential side effects and the known phenomenon of rebound acid hypersecretion. Cong zhi 6 is a multi-herbal Tibetan formula additionally containing calcium carbonate and is available in several European countries as a food supplement Padma Aciben/Padma AciTib. CASE REPORT: Ten patients with LPR took Cong zhi 6. The course of the complaints was documented, and the data were retrospectively analysed. Clinical symptoms as assessed with the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) questionnaire and the findings in laryngoscopy with the Reflux Finding Score (RFS) both showed marked improvement of several symptoms. The number of patients with pathological LPR sum score was significantly reduced from 8 to 2 patients and from 10 to 1 patient in RSI and RFS, respectively. The mean sum scores were reduced from 18.1 to 8.4 (RSI) and from 12.9 to 4.4 (RFS), respectively. Also, other gastrointestinal symptoms, such as abdominal pain, bloating, feeling of fullness, and nausea, which are usually associated with functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome, were markedly improved (reduction of mean score of the 3 most frequent symptoms by 77-87%). CONCLUSION: Standard medical treatment for LPR consists in high dosed PPI for at least 4 weeks, which is known for several side effects and does not treat reliable the nonacid component of LPR of pepsin or other gastric enzymes. Therefore, other medical treatment options are urgently needed. The promising data of this case series suggest that the Tibetan herbal formula Cong zhi 6 may be a treatment option in LPR and related gastrointestinal symptoms and warrant further research.Der laryngopharyngeale Reflux (LPR) ist eine häufige Erkrankung. In europäischen Ländern wird die Prävalenz in der Gesamtbevölkerung auf 10­30% geschätzt. Die Behandlung beinhaltet Ernährungs- und Verhaltensänderung sowie die Gabe hochdosierter Protonen-Pumpen-Hemmer (PPI) über mindestens 4 Wochen. PPI sind jedoch aufgrund ihrer hohen potenziellen Nebenwirkungen und des bekannten Rebound-Phänomens der sauren Magensafthypersekretion nicht unproblematisch. Cong zhi 6 ist eine tibetische Rezeptur aus einem Vielpflanzengemisch sowie zusätzlich Calciumcarbonat und ist in einigen europäischen Ländern als Nahrungsergänzungsmittel Padma Aciben/Padma AciTib erhältlich.Zehn Patienten mit laryngo-pharyngealem Reflux (LPR) nahmen Cong zhi 6 ein. Der Beschwerdeverlauf wurde dokumentiert und die Daten retrospektiv analysiert. Die klinischen Symptome, die mithilfe des Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) Fragebogens erfasst wurden und die mittels des Reflux Finding Score (RFS) beurteilten laryngoskopischen Befunde zeigten beide eine deutliche Verbesserung verschiedener Symptome. Die Zahl der Patienten mit pathologischen LPR-Summenscore reduzierte sich signifikant, im RSI von 8 auf 2 und im RFS von 10 auf 1 Patienten. Der mittlere Summenwert sank von 18.1 auf 8.4 (RSI) und von 12.9 auf 4.4 (RFS). Des Weiteren zeigte sich auch bei anderen gastrointestinalen Beschwerden, wie Bauchschmerzen, Blähungen, Völlegefühl und Übelkeit, die normalerweise mit funktioneller Dyspepsie oder Reizdarm zusammenhängen, eine deutliche Verbesserung (durchschnittliche Verringerung des Scores der drei häufigsten Symptome um 77­87%).Die medikamentöse Standardbehandlung bei LPR besteht aus der hochdosierten PPI-Gabe über mindestens 4 Wochen, die jedoch für verschiedene Nebenwirkungen bekannt ist und die nicht-saure Komponente von LPR, wie Pepsin oder andere digestive Enzyme, nicht mitbehandelt. Daher sind andere medikamentöse Behandlungsmöglichkeiten dringend erforderlich. Die vielversprechenden Daten dieser Fallserie deuten darauf hin, dass die tibetische Pflanzenrezeptur Cong zhi 6 eine Behandlungsoption bei LPR sowie deren gastrointestinalen Symptome darstellt und rechtfertigen weitere Studien.