Economic evaluation of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell pathway for large B-cell lymphomas in the real-life setting: the experience of an Italian hub center in the first three years of activity.

Poor literature report actual and detailed costs of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell pathway in a real-life setting. We retrospectively collect data for all patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive large B-cell lymphoma who underwent leukapheresis between August 2019 and August 2022. All costs and medical resource consumption accountability were calculated on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis, starting from leukapheresis to the time when the patient (infused or not) exited the CAR T-cell pathway for any reason. Eighty patients were addressed to leukapheresis and 59 were finally infused. After excluding CAR-T product cost, the main driver of higher costs were hospitalizations followed by the examinations/procedures and other drugs, respectively 43.9%, 26.3% and 25.4% of the total. Regarding costs of drugs and medications other than CAR T products, the most expensive items are those referred to AEs, both infective and extra-infective within 30 days from infusion, that account for 63% of the total. Density plot of cost analyses did not show any statistically significant difference with respect to the years of leukapheresis or infusion. To achieve finally 59/80 infused patients the per capita patients without CAR-T products results 74,000 euros. This analysis covers a growing concern on health systems, the burden of expenses related to CAR T-cell therapy, which appears to provide significant clinical benefit despite its high cost, thus making economic evaluations highly relevant. The relevance of this study should be also viewed in light of continuously evolving indications for this therapy.

An optimized protocol for the generation and functional analysis of human mast cells from CD34+ enriched cell populations.

The culture of mast cells from human tissues such a cord blood, peripheral blood or bone marrow aspirates has advanced our understanding of human mast cells (huMC) degranulation, mediator production and response to pharmacologic agents. However, existing methods for huMC culture tend to be laborious and expensive. Combining technical approaches from several of these protocols, we designed a simplified and more cost effective approach to the culture of mast cells from human cell populations including peripheral blood and cryopreserved cells from lymphocytapheresis. On average, we reduced by 30-50 fold the amount of culture media compared to our previously reported method, while the total MC number generated by this method (2.46±0.63×106 vs. 2.4±0.28×106, respectively, from 1.0×108 lymphocytapheresis or peripheral blood mononuclear blood cells [PBMCs]) was similar to our previous method (2.36±0.70×106), resulting in significant budgetary savings. In addition, we compared the yield of huMCs with or without IL-3 added to early cultures in the presence of stem cell factor (SCF) and interlukin-6 (IL-6) and found that the total MC number generated, while higher with IL-3 in the culture, did not reach statistical significance, suggesting that IL-3, often recommended in the culture of huMCs, is not absolutely required. We then performed a functional analysis by flow cytometry using standard methods and which maximized the data we could obtain from cultured cells. We believe these approaches will allow more laboratories to culture and examine huMC behavior going forward.

Treating inflammatory bowel disease by adsorptive leucocytapheresis: a desire to treat without drugs.

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are the major phenotypes of the idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which afflicts millions of individuals throughout the world with debilitating symptoms, impairing function and quality of life. Current medications are aimed at reducing the symptoms or suppressing exacerbations. However, patients require life-long medications, and this can lead to drug dependency, loss of response together with adverse side effects. Indeed, drug side effects become additional morbidity factor in many patients on long-term medications. Nonetheless, the efficacy of anti-tumour necrosis factors (TNF)-α biologics has validated the role of inflammatory cytokines notably TNF-α in the exacerbation of IBD. However, inflammatory cytokines are released by patients' own cellular elements including myeloid lineage leucocytes, which in patients with IBD are elevated with activation behaviour and prolonged survival. Accordingly, these leucocytes appear logical targets of therapy and can be depleted by adsorptive granulocyte/monocyte apheresis (GMA) with an Adacolumn. Based on this background, recently GMA has been applied to treat patients with IBD in Japan and in the European Union countries. Efficacy rates have been impressive as well as disappointing. In fact the clinical response to GMA seems to define the patients' disease course, response to medications, duration of active disease, and severity at entry. The best responders have been first episode cases (up to 100%) followed by steroid naïve and patients with a short duration of active disease prior to GMA. Patients with deep ulcers together with extensive loss of the mucosal tissue and cases with a long duration of IBD refractory to existing medications are not likely to benefit from GMA. It is clinically interesting that patients who respond to GMA have a good long-term disease course by avoiding drugs including corticosteroids in the early stage of their IBD. Additionally, GMA is very much favoured by patients for its good safety profile. GMA in 21st century reminds us of phlebotomy as a major medical practice at the time of Hippocrates. However, in patients with IBD, there is a scope for removing from the body the sources of pro-inflammatory cytokines and achieve disease remission. The bottom line is that by introducing GMA at an early stage following the onset of IBD or before patients develop extensive mucosal damage and become refractory to medications, many patients should respond to GMA and avoid pharmacologics. This should fulfill the desire to treat without drugs.

Rescue stem cell mobilization with plerixafor economizes leukapheresis in patients with multiple myeloma.

While extensive data demonstrated that plerixafor improves stem cell harvest in difficult-to-mobilize patients, economic concerns limit a broader application. We retrospectively assessed the effect of an early plerixafor rescue regimen for mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma. Patients were intended for high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT) and therefore received cyclophosphamide-based mobilization chemotherapy and consecutive stimulation with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Fifteen patients with poor stem cell harvest in the first leukapheresis session received plerixafor. Data were compared with a matched historic control group of 45 patients who also had a poor stem cell yield in the first apheresis session, but continued mobilization with G-CSF alone. Patients in the plerixafor group collected significantly more CD34+ cells in total (median 4.9 vs. 3.7 [range 1.6-14.1 vs. 1.1-8.0] × 10(6) CD34+ cells /kg bw; P < 0.05), and also more CD34+ cells per leukapheresis procedure (P < 0.001). Consequently, they required a significantly lower number of leukapheresis procedures to achieve the collection goal (median 2.0 vs. 4.0 [range 2-3 vs. 2-9] procedures; P < 0.001). The efficiency of the collected stem cells in terms of hematologic engraftment after ABSCT was found to be equal in both groups. These data demonstrate that rescue mobilization with plerixafor triggered by a low stem cell yield in the first leukapheresis session is effective. Although the actual economic benefit may vary depending on the local leukapheresis costs, the median saving of two leukapheresis procedures offsets most of the expenses for the substance in this setting. An exemplary cost calculation is provided to illustrate this effect.

Efficacy, safety and cost analyses in ulcerative colitis patients undergoing granulocyte and monocyte adsorption or receiving prednisolone.

BACKGROUND: Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are treated with prednisolone (PSL), which causes adverse side effects. Extracorporeal granulocyte/monocyte adsorption (GMA) with an Adacolumn depletes elevated/activated myeloid lineage leucocytes as sources of inflammatory cytokines. We were interested to evaluate the efficacy, safety and the treatment cost for PSL and GMA. METHODS: Forty-one patients with active UC had achieved remission with GMA, at 1 or 2 sessions/week, up to 10 sessions (n=24) or with orally administered PSL (1mg/kg bodyweight, n=17). Clinical activity index (CAI) ≤4 was considered clinical remission. Following remission, patients received 5-aminosalicylic acid (2250-3000mg/day) or sulphasalazine (4000-6000mg/day) as maintenance therapy and were followed for 600 days. The total treatment cost was assessed based on 1€=150JPY. RESULTS: PSL was tapered after two weeks, and discontinued when a patient achieved remission. The average time to the disappearance of at least one major UC symptom (haematochezia, diarrhoea, or abdominal discomfort) was 15.3 days in the GMA group and 12.7 days in the PSL group, while time to remission was 27.9 days in the GMA group and 27.6 days in the PSL group, CAI 0.8 and 2.0, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier plots showed similar remission maintenance rates over the 600 days follow-up period. The average medical cost was 12739.4€/patient in the GMA group and 8751.3€ in the PSL group (P<0.05). In the GMA group, 5 transient adverse events were observed vs 10 steroid related adverse events in the PSL group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In appropriately selected patients, GMA has significant efficacy with no safety concern. The higher cost of GMA vs PSL should be compromised by good safety profile of this non-pharmacological treatment intervention.

Steroid-sparing strategies in the management of ulcerative colitis: efficacy of leukocytapheresis.

Active ulcerative colitis (UC) is frequently associated with infiltration of a large number of leukocytes into the bowel mucosa. Leukocytapheresis is a novel nonpharmacologic approach for active UC, in which leukocytes are mechanically removed from the circulatory system. Current data indicate that leukocytapheresis is efficacious in improving response and remission rates with excellent tolerability and safety in patients with UC. Corticosteroid therapy remains a mainstay in the treatment of active UC; however, long-term, high doses of corticosteroids usually produce predictable and potentially serious side effects. If leukocytapheresis can spare patients from exposure to corticosteroids, the risk of steroid-induced adverse events should be minimized. This may be of great benefit to patients because severe side effects of steroids seriously impair health-related quality of life. In this article, we reviewed current evidence on whether leukocytapheresis can avoid or reduce the use of corticosteroids in the management of patients with UC. Several studies have shown that leukocytapheresis was effective for steroid-naïve patients with active UC. Furthermore, both short-term and long-term studies have demonstrated the steroid-sparing effects of leukocytapheresis therapy in patients with UC. Although the evidence level is not striking, the available data suggest that leukocytapheresis can avoid or reduce the use of corticosteroids in the management of UC. Large, well-designed clinical trials are necessary to more accurately evaluate the steroid-sparing effects of leukocytapheresis in the management of UC.

Multiple myeloma patients receiving large volume leukapheresis efficiently yield enough CD34+ cells to allow double transplants.

Current protocols for myeloma patients require more than one autologous transplant. We performed a retrospective study to determine the cost-effectiveness of large volume leukapheresis (LVL) compared with standard volume leukapheresis (SVL) collection when two transplants are required. We evaluated 87 patients who underwent a cumulative total of 260 LVL and SVL collections. The median product volume per collection was 356 ml for LVL, and this was significantly higher than the median product volume per collection for SVL (median 149.5 ml, P < 0.001). The median total CD34+ cell yield/kg was 6.4 x 10(6) for LVL and 5.2 x 10(6) for SVL. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.005). Because the target CD34+ cell dose for a single transplant was 3 x 10(6)/kg at our institution, overall the LVL yields enough CD34+ cells that could allow for two transplants. Therefore, more patients in the LVL group were able to undergo a potential second transplant. Because of the reserved cells for a second transplant, LVL patients received significantly less CD34+ cell/kg per transplant than the patients in SVL group (P = <0.001). As a result, LVL group had statistically significant but clinically insignificant delay in neutrophil (P = <0.001) and platelet (P = 0.02) engraftments. Additionally, using LVL instead of SVL to collect >or=6 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells may potentially save $7,497 per patient. We therefore conclude that LVL is the method of choice for collection of multiple myeloma patients when two transplants are anticipated.

EPO in combination with G-CSF improves mobilization effectiveness after chemotherapy with ifosfamide, epirubicin and etoposide and reduces costs during mobilization and transplantation of autologous hematopoietic progenitor cells.

A successful stem cell harvest is a prerequisite for peripheral blood SCT. We investigated the number of CD34(+) cells mobilized, the number of leukaphereses needed and the expenses of treatment for 28 patients with multiple myeloma randomly assigned to receive either G-CSF alone or G-CSF+EPO for stem cell mobilization after chemotherapy with ifosfamide, epirubicin and etoposide. All patients treated with G-CSF+EPO reached the threshold of 6 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells per kg body weight (kgbw), with a mean of 1.3 leukaphereses. On average 15.4 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kgbw were collected. In the G-CSF-alone group, the mean number of leukaphereses was 1.8, and 12.6 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kgbw were collected, and two patients failed the threshold. Overall costs per patient for mobilization and leukaphereses were 8339 euro (G-CSF+EPO) and 8842 euro (G-CSF). After transplantation, fewer blood transfusions (0.6 versus 1.3, P=0.05), fewer days on antibiotics (2.3 versus 6.1, P=0.02) and a shorter hospital stay (15.2 versus 17.8, P=0.06) were noted in the G-CSF+EPO group resulting in a 19.2% reduction of costs for each transplant (P=0.018). In summary, EPO improves the mobilization efficiency of G-CSF and so reduces costs of mobilization and SCT.

Evaluation of 'out-of-specification' CliniMACS CD34-selection procedures of hematopoietic progenitor cell-apheresis products.

BACKGROUND: Immunomagnetic selection of CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) using CliniMACS CD34 selection technology is widely used to provide high-purity HPC grafts. However, the number of nucleated cells and CD34+ cells recommended by the manufacturer for processing in a single procedure or with 1 vial of CD34 reagent is limited. METHODS: In this retrospective evaluation of 643 CliniMACS CD34-selection procedures, we validated the capacity of CliniMACS tubing sets and CD34 reagent. Endpoints of this study were the recovery and purity of CD34+ cells, T-cell depletion efficiency and recovery of colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM). RESULTS: Overloading normal or large-scale tubing sets with excess numbers of total nucleated cells, without exceeding the maximum number of CD34+ cells, had no significant effect on the recovery and purity of CD34+ cells. In contrast, overloading normal or large-scale tubing sets with excess numbers of CD34+ cells resulted in a significantly lower recovery of CD34+ cells. Furthermore, the separation capacity of 1 vial of CD34 reagent could be increased safely from 600 x 10(6) CD34+ cells to 1000 x 10(6) CD34+ cells with similar recovery of CD34(+) cells. Finally, T-cell depletion efficiency and the fraction of CD34+ cells that formed CFU-GM colonies were not affected by out-of-specification procedures. DISCUSSION: Our validated increase of the capacity of CliniMACS tubing sets and CD34 reagent will reduce the number of selection procedures and thereby processing time for large HPC products. In addition, it results in a significant cost reduction for these procedures.

Treatment cost of ulcerative colitis is apheresis with Adacolumn cost-effective?

BACKGROUND: Scarce data are available in Europe on the cost of treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). AIM: To assess the cost of illness of moderate-to-severe UC in two scenarios: traditional treatment versus alternative treatment incorporating granulocyte, monocyte adsorption - apheresis (GMA-Apheresis; Adacolumn). To determine the relative cost-effectiveness of both options in steroid-dependent patients. METHODS: One-year cost-of-illness and cost-effectiveness analysis from the third-payer perspective using a decision tree model was carried out. Probabilities of each event were derived from the literature and an expert panel. Direct medical costs were obtained from official sources (euro2004). Effectiveness was measured by the proportion of patients achieving clinical remission. RESULTS: The average annual cost per patient treated with traditional treatment was estimated to be euro6740; with GMA-Apheresis, the cost was estimated to be euro6959. In steroid-dependent patients, the average annual cost was euro6059 and euro11,436, respectively. The proportion of patients achieving clinical remission with GMA-Apheresis was 22.5% higher. As second- and third-line therapy, a new course of corticosteroids and surgery was avoided in 18.5 and 4% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating GMA-Apheresis (Adacolumn) in the therapeutic management of moderate-to-severe UC patients is cost-effective and implies savings related to the reduction of adverse effects derived from corticosteroid use and to the decreased number of surgical interventions.

Implementation of peripheral blood CD34 analyses to initiate leukapheresis: marked reduction in resource utilization.

BACKGROUND: Analysis of the peripheral blood (PB) C34 value may determine the optimal time to initiate leukapheresis. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: After selecting a threshold PB CD34 value of five CD34 + cells per microL to initiate leukapheresis procedure, a prospective analysis of 50 consecutive patients was initiated to identify the optimal time to initiate leukapheresis and its impact on costs and resource utilization. Clinical decisions were made to commence or to postpone leukapheresis with this PB CD34 threshold number. Based on PB CD34 values for each patient, the number of leukapheresis procedures, postponed or canceled, the number of CD34+ cells per kg, and the total number of cells collected were identified. Costs of mobilization were obtained from the hospital cost accounting system. RESULTS: In 13 months, 50 patients with a hematologic disorder underwent mobilization. There were 34 cancellations or postponements of collections due to a low PB CD34 value in 13 patients. By use of our identified costs per initial collection, this resulted in a savings of 67,660 US dollars. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study defines how the implementation of the PB CD34 value results in costs savings. A low PB CD34 value canceled or postponed a significant number of leukapheresis procedures, resulting in a substantial cost savings. Use of the PB CD34 value should be the standard of care during mobilization and peripheral blood progenitor cell collection.

Mobilization, collection, and processing of autologous peripheral blood stem cells: development of a clinical process with associated costs.

We surveyed five academic medical centers to develop a clinical process for patients undergoing cytokine mobilization and leukapheresis prior to autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Costs were obtained from three centers and applied to each component of the pathway. Costs were divided into three categories: (1) pre-apheresis evaluation; (2) process of apheresis; (3) post-apheresis and peripheral blood stem cells processing. All centers participated in the development of the leukapheresis pathway. Because charges vary greatly among institutions, costs were determined from three of the institutions and a mean was calculated for each of the components of the process. Pre-apheresis costs consisted of central line placement, blood work, and the price of cytokine (rhG-CSF). Costs associated with apheresis included professional fees (for physicians and nurses), leukapheresis with stem cell cryopreservation, storage, sterility testing, analysis of circulating CD34+ cell counts, and 1 day of cytokine therapy. The post-apheresis process included thawing with sterility testing along with CD34+ cell number analysis and the performance of clonogenic assays. Total costs were as follows: (1) pre-apheresis, $2711; (2) apheresis, $2990; and, (3) post-apheresis/stem cell processing, $754. This survey from five academic medical centers provides the average costs associated with three main components of the apheresis procedure. Because many patients require multiple aphereses, interventions to achieve target CD34+ cell collections in as few collections as possible would result in significant cost reduction.

Collection efficiencies of CD34+ progenitor cells and mononuclear cells in leukapheresis products quantified by flow cytometry and calculated on the basis of a new formula.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Optimal mobilization and harvest of hematopoietic progenitors are essential for peripheral blood stem cell transplantation after myeloablative high-dose chemotherapy. Conflicting data have been published concerning the most useful, cost-effective collection strategy which is also convenient for patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 66 leukaphereses in 20 patients were retrospectively evaluated. We assessed the predictive value of the number of white blood cells, mononuclear cells (MNCs) and CD34+ cells in peripheral blood for the yield of CD34+ cells in leukapheresis products. The concentrations of MNCs and CD34+ cells were quantified simultaneously by a flow cytometric procedure using fluorescent microparticles. Their collection efficiencies were calculated based on a newly developed formula. RESULTS: The collected hematopoietic progenitor concentration could be predicted only by the number of peripheral blood CD34+ cells prior to apheresis (r = 0.902; p<0.01). Furthermore, the mobilization of at least 30 CD34+ cells/microl peripheral blood was a good predictor that a single leukapheresis would yield a minimum of 2.0x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg body weight. The collection efficiencies calculated by the new formula were 55.2+/-10.7% and 57.7+/-11.2% for MNCs and CD34+ cells, respectively. CONCLUSION: The precise quantification of MNCs and CD34+ cells by a direct flow cytometric assay, as well as the new formula to determine the collection efficiencies, has an impact on optimizing high-quality stem cell products.