Creation and Validation of Classification Criteria for Discoid Lupus Erythematosus.

Importance: Classification criteria are the standardized definitions that are used to enroll uniform cohorts for research studies. They emphasize high specificity and are distinct from diagnostic criteria. No universally recognized classification criteria currently exist for discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE), which has led to problematic heterogeneity in observational and interventional clinical studies across the field. Objective: To create and validate classification criteria for DLE using 12 previously defined candidate criteria items. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this diagnostic study, candidate criteria items were prospectively applied by dermatologists and dermatopathologists at clinical visits of patients with DLE or a condition that could be confused for DLE, termed a DLE mimicker, at academic dermatology practices across the United States, Poland, Japan, and South Korea. Data were collected from December 1, 2017, to February 1, 2019, and analyzed from March 1 to September 19, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Clinical features among these 2 groups were calculated and compared with χ2 or Fisher exact tests. Candidate models were identified using best subsets logistic regression analysis. Improvement tests, fit statistics, and discrimination were considered to choose a final model. Results: Nine sites contributed 215 patients, 15 of whom had missing or incomplete data. The final model for DLE classification criteria includes only clinical variables: atrophic scarring (3 points), location in the conchal bowl (2 points), preference for the head and neck (2 points), dyspigmentation (1 point), follicular hyperkeratosis and/or plugging (1 point), and erythematous to violaceous in color (1 point), with an area under the receiving operating characteristic curve of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.87-0.95). A score of at least 5 points yields a sensitivity of 84.1% and a specificity of 75.9% in the classification of DLE, with increasing scores yielding higher specificity. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings provide the initial validation of classification criteria for DLE for use in observational and clinical trials.

Development of classification criteria for discoid lupus erythematosus: Results of a Delphi exercise.

BACKGROUND: No classification criteria currently exist for discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE), which has led to problematic heterogeneity in both observational and interventional research efforts. OBJECTIVES: We sought to develop DLE classification criteria based on consensus of international expert opinion of relevant stakeholders in the field. METHODS: Using a Delphi consensus process and nominal group techniques, potential items for classification criteria were generated. Experts ranked items in terms of their appropriateness and ability to discriminate DLE from other diagnoses, and items were subsequently eliminated using consensus exercises. RESULTS: A final list of 12 clinical and histopathologic items was generated for potential inclusion into a set of DLE classification criteria through a formal ongoing validation process. LIMITATIONS: The participants are predominantly composed of DLE experts in North America and Europe. CONCLUSION: This work represents a key step toward the development of formal DLE classification criteria.

The classification and diagnosis of cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

Lupus erythematosus (LE) is an inflammatory connective tissue disease of generalized autoimmunity characterized by pathogenic autoantibodies and immune complexes, attributed to loss of immune tolerance. Cutaneous involvement, which appears in the majority of patients with the disease, can present as LE-specific or LE-nonspecific manifestations. The LE-nonspecific manifestations include e.g. vascular skin changes and may be associated with systemic organ manifestations or other autoimmune diseases. In contrast, the LE-specific manifestations encompass the various subtypes of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), which are classified as separate entities without or with less severe systemic organ involvement. In the "Duesseldorf Classification", CLE is subdivided into four different categories: acute CLE (ACLE), subacute CLE (SCLE), chronic CLE (CCLE), and intermittent CLE (ICLE). Differentiation between these subtypes is based on clinical features and average duration of the cutaneous lesions, but can also consider histological changes of skin biopsy specimens and laboratory abnormalities. In addition, direct immunofluorescence and photoprovocation may be applied to confirm the diagnosis in specific cases. Further investigations should be considered dependent on the clinical symptoms of the CLE patient and the results of the laboratory tests. A revised scoring system, the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (RCLASI) has recently been validated to assess disease activity and damage in CLE. In this review, we focus on the classification of CLE and the diagnostic procedures to identify and confirm the different subtypes of the disease.

Lupus erythematosus tumidus with discoid lupus erythematosus-induced alopecia of the scalp.

Lupus erythematosus tumidus (LET) is an uncommon variant of cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Lupus erythematodes tumidus is characterized by smooth, erythematous plaques on sun-exposed areas without surface changes, such as follicular plugs, atrophy, or scale. Histopathologic features include a lymphocytic, perivascular and periadnexal infiltrate with abundant interstitial, superficial, and deep dermal mucin without appreciable epidermal and vacuolar changes. Typically, LET is responsive to treatment with systemic antimalarials. We present a unique case of alopecia associated with LET, which was partially responsive to hydroxychloroquine. We also note that the plaque of LET is adjacent to the plaque of discoid lupus erythematosus.

Lupus eritematoso cutáneo: revisión de nuestra casuística en los últimos 15 años / Lupus erythematosus cutaneous: review of our casuistic in the last 15 years

Introducción. El lupus eritematoso (LE) es una enfermedad inflamatoria multisistémica de etiología desconocida que comprende una variedad de formas clínicas. Material y método. Se efectuó un estudio retrospectivo y descriptivo de los pacientes que consultaron en el Servicio de Dermatología del Policlínico Bancario durante el período comprendido entre enero de 1994 y enero de 2009. Se incluyeron aquellos pacientes mayores de 18 años con diagnóstico histopatológico de lupus eritematoso. Objetivos. Identificar las distintas variantes clínicas de lupus eritematoso, establecer su distribución por sexo y edad, y comparar los resultados con las estadísticas nacionales e internacionales. Resultados. Se evaluaron 46 pacientes (33 mujeres [71,73%]).Edad promedio al diagnóstico: 42 años; rango: 19-70 años. Presentaron lesiones específicas de LE 42 pacientes (91,30%), 28 correspondieron a la variante de lupus eritematoso cutáneo crónico (67%), 6 a lupus eritematoso cutáneo subagudo (14%) y 8 a lupus eritematoso cutáneo agudo (19%). Las lesiones inespecíficas se presentaron en 21 pacientes (45%) y las halladas con mayor frecuencia fueron: fotosensibilidad (38,09%) alopecia difusa (33,33%) y alteraciones vasculares (28,57%). Conclusión. Nuestros hallazgos son similares a los señalados en la bibliografía consultada, a excepción de la edad de presentación, que fue superior.

[Potentially malignant disorders of the oral mucosa: terminology and classification]. / Affections potentiellement malignes de la muqueuse buccale: nomenclature et classification.

The last WHO expert workgroup recommended abandoning the distinction between potentially malignant lesions and conditions. The term to use is "potentially malignant disorders". Leukoplakia is the most common of these disorders, while erythroplakia is rather rare. The diagnosis is still made by excluding other documented white or red lesions. Despite progress in molecular biology, no marker allows predicting malignant transformation. These lesions are treated surgically with or without dysplasia. It is unknown if this surgery can really prevent transformation into squamous cell carcinoma. The potential malignancy of oral lichen planus is still debated. The risk of malignant transformation is lower than that of leukoplakia. No treatment may prevent this. Other potentially malignant conditions such as oral submucous fibrosis, actinic cheilitis, lupus, and immunodeficiency are rare.

Lupus erythematosus tumidus is a separate subtype of cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

Background Lupus erythematosus tumidus (LET) is a rare disease which was first described in 1909 but has not always been considered as a separate entity of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) in the international literature. Objectives To compare characteristic features of different subtypes of CLE and to analyse whether LET can be distinguished as a separate entity in the classification system of the disease. Methods The study involved 44 patients with CLE, including 24 patients with LET, 12 with discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) and eight with subacute CLE (SCLE), from two centres in Germany. A core set questionnaire and an SPSS database were designed to enable a consistent statistical analysis. Results Location of skin lesions did not differ significantly between the CLE subtypes; however, the activity score was significantly lower in LET than in DLE (P < 0.01), and the damage score was significantly lower in LET than in SCLE (P < 0.01) and DLE (P < 0.01). Photosensitivity and antinuclear antibodies were confirmed to be different in LET compared with SCLE and DLE but without statistical significance. Moreover, histological analysis of skin biopsy specimens showed that abundant mucin deposition is significantly more present in LET compared with SCLE (P < 0.01) and DLE (P < 0.01) while prominent interface dermatitis and alteration of hair follicles were absent in LET. Conclusions Several significant differences were found between LET and other subtypes of CLE with regard to clinical, histological and laboratory parameters. These data strongly indicate that LET should be defined as a separate entity in the classification of CLE.

Nomenclature and classification of potentially malignant disorders of the oral mucosa.

At a workshop coordinated by the WHO Collaborating Centre for Oral Cancer and Precancer in the UK issues related to terminology, definitions and classification of oral precancer were discussed by an expert group. The consensus views of the Working Group are presented here. The term, 'potentially malignant disorders', was recommended to refer to precancer as it conveys that not all disorders described under this term may transform into cancer. Critically evaluating all definitions proposed so far for oral leukoplakia, the Working Group agreed that the term leukoplakia should be used to recognize 'white plaques of questionable risk having excluded (other) known diseases or disorders that carry no increased risk for cancer'. An outline was proposed for diagnosing oral leukoplakia that will prevent other oral white disorders being misclassified as leukoplakia. The Working Group discussed the caveats involved in the current use of terminology and classification of oral potentially malignant disorders, deficiencies of these complex systems, and how they have evolved over the past several decades. The terminology presented in this report reflects our best understanding of multi-step carcinogenesis in the oral mucosa, and aspires to engender consistency in use.

[Cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Part 1: clinical manifestations and classification]. / Kutaner Lupus erythematodes. Teil 1: Klinik und Klassifikation.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a heterogenous disorder with a wide range of skin manifestations. Therefore, it has been difficult to develop a unifying concept for classifying CLE from the dermatologic perspective in the past. In 2004, the classification system was updated and includes now acute CLE (ACLE), subacute CLE (SCLE), chronic CLE (CCLE), and intermittent CLE (ICLE). Additional rarely described variants are not listed as separate entities but are included in the classical forms. Diagnosis of the different subtypes of CLE is made by considering genetic, clinical, histopathologic, and immunoserologic findings, with a systematic analysis of individual criteria. In the past years, the etiology and pathogenesis of CLE has been subject of intensive research and it has been shown by several groups that exogenous factors, such as ultraviolet light and drugs, can induce CLE. The first part of this review will enable the reader to identify the various clinical manifestations of CLE and to employ characteristic criteria to assess differential diagnostic considerations.

Lupus tumidus.

Lupus tumidus is a rare subtype of chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus that was first described by Gougerot and Bournier in 1930. Clinically, lupus tumidus presents as smooth, shiny, red-violet plaques of the head and neck that may be pruritic and have a fine scale. These lesions characteristically clear without scarring and recur in their original distribution. Histologic features include superficial and deep lymphohistiocytic infiltrates and abundant dermal deposits of mucin. We describe lupus tumidus as a distinct form of cutaneous lupus erythematosus and report 4 cases.

ARA and EADV criteria for classification of systemic lupus erythematosus in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To verify (1) how many patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) fulfill 4 or more American Rheumatism Association (ARA) and European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) criteria for classification of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); (2) which criteria are mostly fulfilled; (3) the severity of the disease in patients fulfilling criteria; (4) how many patients with systemic involvement fail to fulfill 4 ARA and EADV criteria. METHODS: We studied 207 patients with chronic and subacute CLE, classified according to ARA and EADV criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with localized discoid (L-DLE; 21.8%), 22 with disseminated discoid (D-DLE; 30.5%) and 7 with subacute CLE (SCLE; 28%) had 4 or more ARA criteria. With EADV criteria, these figures fell to 7 (6.4%), 7 (9.7%) and 6 (24%), respectively. Only 3 L-DLE (2.7%), 5 D-DLE (6.9%) and 3 SCLE cases (12%) defined as SLE by ARA criteria and 1, 3 and 3, respectively, by EADV criteria had a renal or neurological disorder, hemolytic anemia and/or thrombocytopenia, vasculitis or serositis. ARA criteria did not classify 7 patients with a similar visceral involvement, while EADV criteria failed in 11 patients. CONCLUSION: In our patients, ARA criteria showed a sensitivity of 88%, a specificity of 79%, a positive predictive value of 56% and a negative predictive value of 96%. EADV criteria showed a sensitivity of only 64%, but a specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value of 61% and a negative predictive value of 94%. ARA criteria should not be used in CLE patients as they are too sensitive, poorly specific and altogether misleading. EADV criteria are more specific, but less sensitive.

The use of antibody to C5b-9 in the subclassification of lupus erythematosus.

Fifty-five patients with biopsy-proven cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE) were identified in whom a prospective and retrospective review of the clinical and laboratory data allowed subclassification into systemic (SLE), subacute (SCLE), or discoid (DLE) variants. In addition to conventional direct immunofluorescence, an indirect immunofluorescent technique, using a monoclonal antibody, was employed to assess deposition of the membranolytic attack complex (C5b-9) in skin lesions. Deposition of C5b-9 within the epidermis correlated with a diagnosis of SCLE with or without antibodies to Ro and was seen in SLE patients with antibodies to extractable nuclear antigens Ro, La, Sm, and RNP, and in DLE patients with positive antinuclear antibodies and/or extracutaneous manifestations. In the SLE group, vascular C5b-9 deposition was present in six patients. Of these, four had circulating lupus anticoagulant, one had lymphocytic vasculitis, and two had antibodies to Ro. In two patients with SLE there was keratinocyte decoration for immunoglobulin G but not for C5b-9, in the absence of seropositivity for antibodies to Ro, La, Sm, and ribonucleoprotein (RNP). The immunohistological examination of skin lesions using a monoclonal antibody to C5b-9 is a valuable adjunct in the subclassification of LE. The presence of C5b-9 within skin lesions of patiens with LE implies a pathogenic role for complement-mediated pore formation.