Circulating Ionized Magnesium as a Measure of Supplement Bioavailability: Results from a Pilot Study for Randomized Clinical Trial.

Oral supplementation may improve the dietary intake of magnesium, which has been identified as a shortfall nutrient. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate appropriate methods for assessing responses to the ingestion of oral magnesium supplements, including ionized magnesium in whole blood (iMg2+) concentration, serum total magnesium concentration, and total urinary magnesium content. In a single-blinded crossover study, 17 healthy adults were randomly assigned to consume 300 mg of magnesium from MgCl2 (ReMag®, a picosized magnesium formulation) or placebo, while having a low-magnesium breakfast. Blood and urine samples were obtained for the measurement of iMg2+, serum total magnesium, and total urine magnesium, during 24 h following the magnesium supplement or placebo dosing. Bioavailability was assessed using area-under-the-curve (AUC) as well as maximum (Cmax) and time-to-maximum (Tmax) concentration. Depending on normality, data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or median (range), and differences between responses to MgCl2 or placebo were measured using the paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Following MgCl2 administration versus placebo administration, we observed significantly greater increases in iMg2+ concentrations (AUC = 1.51 ± 0.96 vs. 0.84 ± 0.82 mg/dL·24h; Cmax = 1.38 ± 0.13 vs. 1.32 ± 0.07 mg/dL, respectively; both p < 0.05) but not in serum total magnesium (AUC = 27.00 [0, 172.93] vs. 14.55 [0, 91.18] mg/dL·24h; Cmax = 2.38 [1.97, 4.01] vs. 2.24 [1.98, 4.31] mg/dL) or in urinary magnesium (AUC = 201.74 ± 161.63 vs. 139.30 ± 92.84 mg·24h; Cmax = 26.12 [12.91, 88.63] vs. 24.38 [13.51, 81.51] mg/dL; p > 0.05). Whole blood iMg2+ may be a more sensitive measure of acute oral intake of magnesium compared to serum and urinary magnesium and may be preferred for assessing supplement bioavailability.

Blood and urinary magnesium kinetics after oral magnesium supplements.

A study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetic profile of three oral magnesium supplements--magnesium chloride solution, slow-release magnesium chloride tablets, and magnesium gluconate tablets--at 16 mmol/dose. Twelve healthy normomagnesemic subjects were evaluated during an initial baseline study, followed by three magnesium supplementation studies. Supplements were administered in a randomized, crossover fashion at weekly intervals. During each of the four trials, subjects followed the same routines and consumed identical diets. Magnesium concentrations were measured in urine samples collected from 0 to 4, 4 to 8, 8 to 12, and 12 to 24 hours. Intraleukocyte, total serum, and ultrafiltrable magnesium were measured in blood samples drawn at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours. Compared with baseline, 24-hour urinary magnesium excretion significantly increased (P < 0.05) after the administration of the magnesium chloride solution and also increased after the administration of the other supplements, but the difference was not significant. The 24-hour areas under the curve (AUCs) for total serum, ultrafiltrable, and leukocyte magnesium were greater after the administration of each of the supplements when compared with baseline, although the differences were not statistically significant. Differences in delta AUCs (supplement AUC minus baseline AUC) for total magnesium, ultrafiltrable magnesium, and 24-hour urinary magnesium excretion were statistically different from zero or between supplements. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) in total serum, ultrafiltrable, and leukocyte magnesium concentrations were observed at various time points. These results suggest that there were no major differences in the overall effect of these supplements on total serum, ultrafiltrable, and leukocyte magnesium concentrations but do reveal differences in the time-concentration profiles in magnesium levels in blood and urine among the three supplement forms.