RESUMEN
Abstract: Assisted reproduction techniques (ARTs) have given rise to novel, non-traditional family models. Still, among the various applications and approaches of 'medically assisted procreation' (MAP), the most divisive one undoubtedly is 'gestational surrogacy' (GS), also in light of the rising number of couples who have chosen it over the past twenty years. Another major implication of ARTs is the creation of intentional (or intended) parenthood in addition to genetic one: the genetic parent's partner is thus defined as the intentional (or second) parent, who by free choice, shares the family project with the genetic parent, even without any biological tie with the child. Hence, the intended parent takes on the same rights and responsibilities towards the child as the biological one. Several countries, including Italy, have enacted norms to discourage cross-border surrogacy, deeming it harmful to the dignity of women and children. Recently, however, the Italian government has decided intensify the fight against this practice: the Chamber of Deputies (Italy's lower chamber of parliament) has passed a law which punishes couples that resort to surrogacy even if the agreement and the birth take place abroad. Therefore, surrogacy would become a so-called universal crime. In light of the fact that criminalization is a serious and highly consequential step, which may have life-changing consequences for the intended parents, the aim of this paper is to assess whether this may be an effective instrument for regulating the interests at stake and, therefore, whether it would be desirable for other countries to follow such a model. Ultimately, it is worth remarking that for those who seek to achieve parenthood, such a desire is among the most profound aspects of a person's existential realization. When due to a delicate balance of ethics standards and potentially conflicting rights, lawmakers inter-vene, an authoritarian approach is unlikely to be beneficial. Offering real alternatives to surrogacy in an organic and pragmatic fashion (i.e. expediting adoption procedures, favoring motherhood at a younger age, when infertility issues are less likely to have set in) may be the best way to disincentivize fertility traveling and make sure the rights, hopes and aspirations of all the parties involved are upheld properly.
Asunto(s)
Madres Sustitutas , Humanos , Madres Sustitutas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Italia , Femenino , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/ética , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Embarazo , Discusiones Bioéticas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Turismo Médico/legislación & jurisprudencia , Turismo Médico/ética , Padres , Crimen/legislación & jurisprudencia , NiñoRESUMEN
The article aims to shed a light on the unique complexities inherent in surrogacy and the legal-ethical challenges that currently exists even in many advanced democracies, which frequently result in uneven and ill-defined standards and processes. The recent proposal of making surrogacy a "universal crime", meant to prevent cross-border surrogacy, i.e. travels by citizens from countries where it is illegal to countries where it is legal, has also been weighed, by exploring the current legislative state of affairs, trends and future horizons. Recent case-law has been analyzed and interpreted, with a close focus on Italian Supreme Court ruling n. 38162, issued on 30th December 2022 and European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) rulings issued over the past decade. Uncertainty and ill-defined norms and court rulings risk harming the rights of children, surrogate mothers and intended parents. So far, court decisions have somehow filled the legal vacuum, considering that cross-border surrogacy is not specifically regulated in many countries and the status of children born abroad is still controversial. The views and judgments of supranational courts on the issue need to be accounted for when drafting new specific legislation. It is of utmost importance to uphold the rights of children born through surrogacy abroad, whose best interests risk being damaged. Legislative harmonization at the international level is essential to prevent the cross-border surrogacy trend. The "universal crime" draft bills appear to be difficult to enforce and too vague to be credible at the moment.
Asunto(s)
Madres Sustitutas , Madres Sustitutas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Turismo Médico/legislación & jurisprudencia , Turismo Médico/ética , ItaliaRESUMEN
In Egypt, there is presently a growing need to have a deceased donor transplant program. Egypt conducted its first kidney transplant from a living donor in 1976 and a first partial liver transplant in 2001. Since 2009, the Egyptian Health Authorities Combat Transplant Tourism in concordance with ethics codes and the Declaration of Istanbul Custodian Group has been in place. The Egyptian Transplantation Law of 2011 mentions that organs could be procured from deceased donors based on a will and on family consent. This law has had many critics, including religious authorities who have stressed that organs cannot be taken from a person with brain death because, in their view, life ends with death of all organs. Many intensivists disagree over the definition of death. In addition, the media has communicated contradicting and sometimes misleading health care information. Mummification is rooted in pharos practice and linked to religious beliefs. The ancient Egyptians believed that, by burying the deceased with their organs, they may rejoin with them in the afterlife. Since 2019, the transplant community in Egypt has started collaborations with international transplant organizations and campaigns with doctors and celebrities to donate their organs after death, which have stressed that a deceased donor program could help against end-stage organ mortality. In November 2022, after communications with politicians, President Abdelfattah El Sisi directed the government to establish a regional center for organ transplantation, which aimed to be the biggest in the Middle East and North Africa region. The new center will be part of a new medical city that would replace Nasser Medical Institution in Cairo, Egypt. The Ministry of Health issued an official form to be signed by a person before his death, accepting use of organs, to give hope and support to other patients in need.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Órganos , Donantes de Tejidos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Humanos , Egipto , Trasplante de Órganos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Trasplante de Órganos/ética , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Donantes de Tejidos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Religión y Medicina , Turismo Médico/legislación & jurisprudencia , Turismo Médico/ética , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Actitud Frente a la Muerte , Muerte Encefálica , Formulación de Políticas , Regulación Gubernamental , Consentimiento Informado/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
Ethical considerations for the banking of oocytes for nonautologous use are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Bancos de Muestras Biológicas/ética , Comités de Ética , Donación de Oocito/ética , Donantes de Tejidos/ética , Bancos de Muestras Biológicas/economía , Compensación y Reparación/ética , Confidencialidad/ética , Consejo/ética , Femenino , Humanos , Turismo Médico/ética , Donación de Oocito/economía , Terminología como AsuntoRESUMEN
Background and objectives: To explore the ethical and legal complexities arising from the controversial issue of surrogacy, particularly in terms of how they affect fundamental rights of children and parents. Surrogacy is a form of medically-assisted procreation (MAP) in which a woman "lends" her uterus to carry out a pregnancy on behalf of a third party. There are pathological conditions, such as uterine agenesis or hysterectomy outcomes, that may prevent prospective mothers from becoming pregnant or carry a pregnancy to term; such patients may consider finding a surrogate mother. Many issues relating to surrogacy remain unresolved, with significant disagreements and controversy within the scientific community and public opinion. There are several factors called into play and multiple parties and stakeholders whose objectives and interests need to somehow be reconciled. First and foremost, the authors contend, it is essential to prioritize and uphold the rights of children born through surrogacy and heterologous MAP. Materials and methods: To draw a parallel between Italy and the rest of the world, the legislation in force in twelve European countries was analyzed, eleven of which are part of the European Union (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Greece, Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Lithuania, Czech Republic and Portugal) and three non-members of the same (United Kingdom, Ukraine and Russia), as well as that of twelve non-European countries considered exemplary (United States, Canada, Australia, India, China, Thailand, Israel, Nigeria and South Africa); in particular, legislative sources and legal databases were drawn upon, in order to draw a comparison with the Italian legislation currently in force and map out the evolution of the Italian case law on the basis of the judgments issued by Italian courts, including the Constitutional and Supreme Courts and the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR); search engines such as PubMed and Google Scholar were also used, by entering the keywords "surrogacy" and "surrogate motherhood", to find scientific articles concerning assisted reproduction techniques with a close focus on surrogacy. Results: SM is a prohibited and sanctioned practice in Italy; on the other hand, it is allowed in other countries of the world, which leads Italian couples, or couples from other countries where it is banned, to often contact foreign centers in order to undertake a MAP pathway which includes surrogacy; in addition, challenges may arise from the legal status of children born through surrogacy abroad: to date, in most countries, there is no specific legislation aimed at regulating their legal registration and parental status. Conclusion: With reference to the Italian context, despite the scientific and legal evolution on the subject, a legislative intervention aimed at filling the regulatory gaps in terms of heterologous MAP and surrogacy has not yet come to fruition. Considering the possibility of "fertility tourism", i.e., traveling to countries where the practice is legal, as indeed already happens in a relatively significant number of cases, the current legislation, although integrated by the legal interpretation, does not appear to be effective in avoiding the phenomenon of procreative tourism. Moreover, to overcome some contradictions currently present between law 40 and law 194, it would be appropriate to outline an organic and exhaustive framework of rules, which should take into account the multiplicity of interests at stake, in keeping with a fair and sustainable balance when regulating such practices.
Asunto(s)
Política Pública/legislación & jurisprudencia , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Madres Sustitutas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Altruismo , Australia , Niño , Protección a la Infancia/ética , Protección a la Infancia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Comercio , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Israel , Italia , Japón , Turismo Médico/ética , Turismo Médico/legislación & jurisprudencia , Embarazo , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/ética , Federación de Rusia , Problemas Sociales , Tailandia , Ucrania , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
En un contexto globalizado, donde el mundo convencional se expande a lo virtual, se desarrolla un análisis ético y jurídico del turismo médico en Colombia mediante la identificación de riesgos potenciales en la instrumentalización comunicativa. La oferta y demanda de cirugía estética acompañada del marketing, como un reflejo del deseo, lo bello y el maquillaje, promueven tensiones éticas latentes. La incertidumbre jurídica que gravita alrededor del flujo transfronterizo e indeterminación de los distintos sistemas jurídicos exterioriza varios frentes susceptibles de abordaje y que a su vez se erigen como desafíos. El trasfondo de las reflexiones que se divisan hace imprescindible reivindicar prerrogativas fundamentales, inherentes a los seres humanos, que parecen desvanecerse ante inserciones cada vez más frecuentes y penetrantes provenientes de realidades construidas y enraizadas en el vaivén de los precios (AU)
In a globalized context, where the conventional world expands into the virtual, an ethical and legal analysis of medical tourism in Colombia is developed through identifying potential risks via communicative instrumentalization. The supply and demand for cosmetic surgery along with the associated marketing, as it reflects on desire, beauty, and makeup, promote latent ethical tensions. The legal uncertainty that gravitates around the cross-border flow and the indeterminacy within the different legal systems externalizes on several fronts that should be addressed and which in turn pose challenges. The background of the reflections that can be seen make it essential to claim fundamental prerogatives, inherent to humanity, which seem to vanish when presented with the frequent and penetrating insertions coming from realities built and rooted in the fluctuations of prices (AU)
En un context globalitzat, on el món convencional s'expandeix al virtual, es desenvolupa una anàlisi ètica i jurídica del turisme mèdic a Colòmbia mitjançant la identificació de riscos potencials en la instrumentalització comunicativa. L'oferta i demanda de cirurgia estètica acompanyada del màrqueting, com un reflex del desig, el bell i el maquillatge, promouen tensions ètiques latents. La incertesa jurídica que gravita al voltant del flux transfronterer i indeterminació dels diferents sistemes jurídics exterioritza diversos fronts susceptibles d'abordatge i que al seu torn s'erigeixen com a desafiaments. El rerefons de les reflexions que s'albiren fa imprescindible reivindicar prerrogatives fonamentals, inherents als éssers humans, que semblen esvair-se davant insercions cada vegada més freqüents i penetrants provinents de realitats construïdes i arrelades en el vaivé dels preus (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Turismo Médico/ética , Turismo Médico/legislación & jurisprudencia , Jurisprudencia , Ética Médica , ColombiaAsunto(s)
Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Turismo Médico , Tráfico de Órganos , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Trasplantes , Regulación Gubernamental , Política de Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/economía , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/ética , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Turismo Médico/economía , Turismo Médico/ética , Turismo Médico/legislación & jurisprudencia , Tráfico de Órganos/economía , Tráfico de Órganos/ética , Tráfico de Órganos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Formulación de Políticas , Donantes de Tejidos/ética , Donantes de Tejidos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/economía , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/ética , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Trasplantes/economíaRESUMEN
In 2017, the court case over medical treatment of UK infant, Charlie Gard, reached global attention. In this article, I will analyze one of the more distinctive elements of the case. The UK courts concluded that treatment of Charlie Gard was not in his best interests and that it would be permissible to withdraw life-sustaining treatment. However, in addition, the court ruled that Charlie should not be transferred overseas for the treatment that his parents sought, even though specialists in Italy and the US were willing to provide that treatment. Is it ethical to prevent parents from pursuing life-prolonging treatment overseas for their children? If so, when is it ethical to do this? I will outline arguments in defense of obstructing transfer in some situations. I will argue, however, that this is only justified if there is good reason to think that the proposed treatment would cause harm.
Asunto(s)
Discusiones Bioéticas , Inutilidad Médica/ética , Transferencia de Pacientes/ética , Privación de Tratamiento/ética , Disentimientos y Disputas , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/terapia , Italia , Masculino , Inutilidad Médica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Turismo Médico/ética , Turismo Médico/legislación & jurisprudencia , Padres , Transferencia de Pacientes/legislación & jurisprudencia , Negativa al Tratamiento/ética , Negativa al Tratamiento/legislación & jurisprudencia , Texas , Traqueostomía/ética , Traqueostomía/legislación & jurisprudencia , Reino Unido , Estados Unidos , Privación de Tratamiento/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
This article aims to identify the main legal and ethical issues around international surrogacy. Owing to the legal diversity and ethical background of such a globalized practice, a review of the key existing literature on these two matters has been identified and analyzed. The article also identifies and analyzes the most significant legal solutions provided by supranational jurisdictions when dealing with cases of international surrogacy. The scope of the article includes the efforts to reach a minimum legal framework at the international level, with the aim not to standardize but to provide common legal solutions to those travelling abroad to have a child by means of surrogacy.
Asunto(s)
Turismo Médico , Medicina Reproductiva , Madres Sustitutas , Femenino , Humanos , Internacionalidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Turismo Médico/ética , Turismo Médico/legislación & jurisprudencia , Formulación de Políticas , Embarazo , Medicina Reproductiva/ética , Medicina Reproductiva/legislación & jurisprudencia , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/ética , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Madres Sustitutas/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
Mitochondrial replacement techniques (MRTs, also referred to as mitochondrial replacement therapies) have given hope to many women who wish to have genetically related children but have mitochondrial DNA mutations in their eggs. MRTs have also spurred deep ethical disagreements and led to different regulatory approaches worldwide. In this review, we discuss the current regulation of MRTs across several countries. After discussing the basics of the science, we describe the current law and policy directions in seven countries: the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Australia, Germany, Israel, and Singapore. We also discuss the emerging phenomenon of medical tourism (also called medical travel) for MRTs to places like Greece, Spain, Mexico, and Ukraine. We then pull out some key findings regarding similarities and differences in regulatory approaches around the world.
Asunto(s)
Turismo Médico/ética , Mitocondrias/genética , Enfermedades Mitocondriales/terapia , Terapia de Reemplazo Mitocondrial/ética , Terapia de Reemplazo Mitocondrial/legislación & jurisprudencia , Australia , Canadá , Femenino , Ingeniería Genética/ética , Alemania , Humanos , Israel , Enfermedades Mitocondriales/genética , Personeidad , Singapur , Reino Unido , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Medical tourism (MT) is an increasingly utilized modality for acquiring medical treatment for patients globally. This review assimilates the current literature regarding MT, with particular focus on the applications, ethics and economics. METHODS: A systematic review of MEDLINE and PubMed Central databases for publications relating to MT from 2005 to 2018 yielded 43 articles for this review. RESULTS: Patients seeking elective bariatric, cosmetic and orthopedic surgery abroad are motivated by significantly lower costs, all-inclusive vacation packages and reduced wait times. Complication rates as high as 56% include infection, poor aesthetic and functional outcome and adverse cardiovascular events. Cross-border reproductive care has steadily increased due to less restrictive policies in select countries; however, the depth of research on outcomes and quality of care is abysmal. Stem cell therapy promise treatments that are often not well researched and offer minimal evidence of efficacy, yet patients are drawn to treatment through anecdotal advertisements and a last sense of hope. Transplant surgery sought to decrease wait times carries many of the similar aforementioned risks and may contribute to the practice of organ trafficking in countries with high rates of poverty. Patients and countries alike are motivated by a plethora of factors to engage in the MT industry but may be doing so without accurate knowledge of the quality, safety or potential for economic gain. Safety is of utmost importance to prevent surgical complications and the spread of treatment-resistant bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: MT is growing in popularity and complexity. The lack of standardization in its definition and regulation leads to difficulty in epidemiologic and economic analysis and ethical issues of informed consent and health equity. The findings of this review may be used by the stakeholders of MT, including patients and providers, to enhance informed decision-making and quality of care.
Asunto(s)
Turismo Médico , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Toma de Decisiones , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Turismo Médico/economía , Turismo Médico/ética , Turismo Médico/normas , ViajeRESUMEN
Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has evolved rapidly in Asia with good outcomes for both donor and recipient. Nonetheless, LDLT remains a highly demanding technique and complex surgery. The potential risks to the donors provide the basis for many of the ethical dilemmas associated with LDLT. The transplant team must have a good knowledge of the principles of bioethics in order to handle these matters. To look after the need, donor's safety and the chance for good recipient outcomes, the principles of respect for the donor's autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence should be practiced. In accordance with the concept of equipoise, the risk to the donor must balance the benefit to the recipient. The transplant center should have adequate experience and proven expertise in LDLT. There are concerns regarding the validity of informed consent given by the donor. While donations to non-relative patients may, at first sight, indicate radical altruism, it is important to apply careful scrutiny. Though organ trading is strictly prohibited by the law, there seems to be an inherent risk with directed donations to strangers. Transplant tourism has flourished in some countries in spite of the existence of strict laws. There are reservations regarding transplantation done by foreign visiting teams. Donor websites facilitating patients and donors and Facebook pages bear no responsibility for the outcomes of their matches and cannot ensure sufficient and accurate information about donation, transplantation, and post-operation life. Telemedicine and virtual consultations appeared to work better when the clinician and the patient know and trust each other.
Asunto(s)
Consentimiento Informado/ética , Trasplante de Hígado/ética , Donadores Vivos/ética , Asia , Humanos , Turismo Médico/ética , Periodo Posoperatorio , TelemedicinaRESUMEN
Australian medical professionals whose patients undertake assisted reproductive treatment abroad face a conflict: to try to provide optimal and on-going care for their patient at the same time as ensuring compliance with Australian legal, ethical, and professional rules which proscribe as unsafe or unethical key aspects of such treatment. A major suggestion from literature on medical travel is that risks to the patient can be mitigated through the involvement of the local professional. However, the force of legal regulation and ethical guidance in Australia strenuously directs clinicians away from involvement in overseas reproductive treatment. This article reports on 37 interviews with Australians travelling abroad for surrogacy, egg donation, and embryo donation, reflecting on patients' experiences with Australian medical professionals both before and after they travelled. Patient reports demonstrate a fragmented and bewildering medical landscape in Australia, in which the ability to access domestic care and expertise varied markedly depending upon the kind of treatment patients were seeking abroad, and the mode of practice of the Australian doctor. Doctors practicing within licensed IVF clinics were notably more constrained than those outside such a setting. Patients seeking egg donation were offered information and received a wide range of diagnostic and preparatory treatments, while those seeking surrogacy were shunned, chided and offered limited (and sometimes covert) assistance. While recent changes to national ethical guidance improve clarity on information giving, the ethical and legal propriety of Australian medical professionals providing diagnostic or preparatory treatment for cross border reproduction remains uncertain.
Asunto(s)
Ética Profesional , Personal de Salud/ética , Personal de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Turismo Médico/ética , Turismo Médico/legislación & jurisprudencia , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/ética , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adulto , Australia , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Femenino , Guías como Asunto , Reducción del Daño , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Turismo Médico/normas , Embarazo , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/normasRESUMEN
Cross-border reproductive care (CBRC) can be defined as the movement from one jurisdiction to another for medically assisted reproduction (MAR). CBRC raises many ethical concerns that have been addressed extensively. However, the conclusions are still based on scarce evidence even considering the global scale of CBRC. Empirical ethics appears as a way to foster this ethical reflection on CBRC while attuning it with the experiences of its main actors. To better understand the 'in and out' situation of CBRC in Canada, we conducted an ethnographic study taking a 'critically applied ethics' approach. This article presents a part of the findings of this research, obtained by data triangulation from qualitative analysis of pertinent literature, participant observation in two Canadian fertility clinics and 40 semidirected interviews. Based on participants' perceptions, four themes emerged: (1) inconsistencies of the Canadian legal framework; (2) autonomy and the necessity to resort to CBRC; (3) safety and the management of CBRC individual risks; and (4) justice and solidarity. The interaction between these four themes highlights the problematic of 'reproductive outsourcing' that characterised the Canadian situation, a system where the controversial aspects of MAR are knowingly pushed outside the borders.