Performance of three predictive scores to avoid delayed diagnosis of significant blunt bowel and mesenteric injury: A 12-year retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Avoiding missed diagnosis and therapeutic delay for significant blunt bowel and mesenteric injuries (sBBMIs) after trauma is still challenging despite the widespread use of computed tomography (CT). Several scoring tools aiming at reducing this risk have been published. The purpose of the present work was to assess the incidence of delayed (>24 hours) diagnosis for sBBMI patients and to compare the predictive performance of three previously published scores using clinical, radiological, and laboratory findings: the Bowel Injury Prediction Score (BIPS) and the scores developed by Raharimanantsoa Score (RS) and by Faget Score (FS). METHODS: A population-based retrospective observational cohort study was conducted; it included adult trauma patients after road traffic crashes admitted to Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland, between 2008 and 2019 (n = 1,258) with reliable information about sBBMI status (n = 1,164) and for whom all items for score calculation were available (n = 917). The three scores were retrospectively applied on all patients to assess their predictive performance. RESULTS: The incidence of sBBMI after road traffic crash was 3.3% (38 of 1,164), and in 18% (7 of 38), there was a diagnostic and treatment delay of more than 24 hours. The diagnostic performances of the FS, the RS, and the BIPS to predict sBBMI, expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, were 95.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.7-97.9%), 89.2% (95% CI, 83.2-95.3%), and 87.6% (95% CI, 81.8-93.3%) respectively. CONCLUSION: The present study confirms that diagnostic delays for sBBMI still occur despite the widespread use of abdominal CT. When CT findings during the initial assessment are negative or equivocal for sBBMI, using a score may be helpful to select patients for early diagnostic laparoscopy. The FS had the best individual diagnostic performance. However, the BIPS or the RS, relying on clinical and laboratory variables, may be helpful to select patients for early diagnostic laparoscopy when there are unspecific CT signs of bowel or mesenteric injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

Radiologic Imaging of Traumatic Bowel and Mesenteric Injuries: A Comprehensive Up-to-Date Review.

Diagnosing bowel and mesenteric trauma poses a significant challenge to radiologists. Although these injuries are relatively rare, immediate laparotomy may be indicated when they occur. Delayed diagnosis and treatment are associated with increased morbidity and mortality; therefore, timely and accurate management is essential. Additionally, employing strategies to differentiate between major injuries requiring surgical intervention and minor injuries considered manageable via non-operative management is important. Bowel and mesenteric injuries are among the most frequently overlooked injuries on trauma abdominal computed tomography (CT), with up to 40% of confirmed surgical bowel and mesenteric injuries not reported prior to operative treatment. This high percentage of falsely negative preoperative diagnoses may be due to several factors, including the relative rarity of these injuries, subtle and non-specific appearances on CT, and limited awareness of the injuries among radiologists. To improve the awareness and diagnosis of bowel and mesenteric injuries, this article provides an overview of the injuries most often encountered, imaging evaluation, CT appearances, and diagnostic pearls and pitfalls. Enhanced diagnostic imaging awareness will improve the preoperative diagnostic yield, which will save time, money, and lives.

Factors associated with enteral nutrition tolerance after trauma laparotomy of the small bowel and mesenteric injuries by blunt trauma.

BACKGROUND: In patients with blunt injury due to abdominal trauma, the common cause for laparotomy is damage to the small bowel and mesentery. Recently, postoperative early enteral nutrition (EEN) has been recommended for abdominal surgery. However, EEN in patients with blunt bowel and/or mesenteric injury (BBMI) has not been established. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the factors that affect early postoperative small bowel obstruction (EPSBO) and the date of tolerance to solid food and defecation (SF + D) after surgery in patients with BBMI. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent laparotomy for BBMI at a single regional trauma center between January 2013 and July 2021. A total of 257 patients were included to analyze the factors associated with enteral nutrition tolerance in patients with EPSBO and the postoperative day of tolerance to SF + D. RESULTS: The incidence of EPSBO in patients with BBMI was affected by male sex, small bowel organ injury scale (OIS) score, mesentery OIS score, amount of crystalloid, blood transfusion, and postoperative drain removal date. The higher the mesentery OIS score, the higher was the EPSBO incidence, whereas the small bowel OIS did not increase the incidence of EPSBO. The amount of crystalloid infused within 24 h; the amount of packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, and platelet concentrate transfused; the time of drain removal; Injury Severity Score; and extremity abbreviated injury scale (AIS) score were correlated with the day of tolerance to SF + D. Multivariate analysis between the EPSBO and non-EPSBO groups identified mesentery and small bowel OIS scores as the factors related to EPSBO. CONCLUSION: Mesenteric injury has a greater impact on EPSBO than small bowel injury. Further research is needed to determine whether the mesentery OIS score should be considered during EEN in patients with BBMI. The amount of crystalloid infused and transfused blood components within 24 h, time of drain removal, injury severity score, and extremity AIS score are related to the postoperative day on which patients can tolerate SF + D.

CT-based diagnostic algorithm to identify bowel and/or mesenteric injury in patients with blunt abdominal trauma.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a CT-based algorithm and evaluate its performance for the diagnosis of blunt bowel and/or mesenteric injury (BBMI) in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. METHODS: This retrospective study included a training cohort of 79 patients (29 with BBMI and 50 patients with blunt abdominal trauma without BBMI) and a validation cohort of 37 patients (13 patients with BBMI and 24 patients with blunt abdominal trauma without BBMI). CT examinations were blindly analyzed by two independent radiologists. For each CT sign, the kappa value, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated. A diagnostic algorithm was built using a recursive partitioning model on the training cohort, and its performances were assessed on the validation cohort. RESULTS: CT signs with kappa value > 0.6 were extraluminal gas, hemoperitoneum, no or moderate bowel wall enhancement, and solid organ injury. CT signs yielding best accuracies in the training cohort were extraluminal gas (98%; 95% CI: 91-100), bowel wall defect (97%; 95% CI: 91-100), irregularity of mesenteric vessels (97%; 95% CI: 90-99), and mesenteric vessel extravasation (97%; 95% CI: 90-99). Using a recursive partitioning model, a decision tree algorithm including extraluminal gas and no/moderate bowel wall enhancement was built, achieving 86% sensitivity (95% CI: 74-99) and 96% specificity (95% CI: 91-100) in the training cohort and 92% sensitivity (95% CI: 78-97) and 88% specificity (95% CI: 74-100) in the validation cohort for the diagnosis of BBMI. CONCLUSIONS: An effective diagnostic algorithm was built to identify BBMI in patients with blunt abdominal trauma using only extraluminal gas and no/moderate bowel wall enhancement on CT examination. KEY POINTS: • A CT diagnostic algorithm that included extraluminal gas and no/moderate bowel wall enhancement was built for the diagnosis of surgical blunt bowel and/or mesenteric injury. • A decision tree combining only two reproducible CT signs has high diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of surgical blunt bowel and/or mesenteric injury.

Multi-center validation of the Bowel Injury Predictive Score (BIPS) for the early identification of need to operate in blunt bowel and mesenteric injuries.

INTRODUCTION: The Bowel Injury Prediction Score (BIPS) is a tool for identifying patients at risk for blunt bowel and mesenteric injury (BBMI) requiring surgery. BIPS is calculated by assigning one point for each of the following: (1) WBC ≥ 17,000, (2) abdominal tenderness, and (3) injury grade ≥ 4 (mesenteric contusion or hematoma with bowel wall thickening or adjacent interloop fluid collection) on CT scan. A total score ≥ 2 is associated with BBMI requiring surgery. We aimed to validate the BIPS as a predictor for patients with BBMIs requiring operative intervention in a multi-center prospective study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were prospectively enrolled at 15 U.S. trauma centers following blunt trauma with suspicion of BBMI on CT scan between July 1, 2018 and July 31, 2019. The BIPS was calculated for each patient enrolled in the study. RESULTS: Of 313 patients, 38% had BBMI requiring operative intervention. Patients were significantly more likely to require surgery in the presence of abdominal tenderness (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.6-8.0) and CT grade ≥ 4 (OR, 11.7; 95% CI, 5.7-23.7). Patients with a BIPS ≥ 2 were more than ten times more likely to require laparotomy than those with a BIPS < 2 (OR, 10.1; 95% CI, 5.0-20.4). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of a BIPS ≥ 2 for BBMI requiring surgery was 72% (CI 0.6-0.8), 78% (CI 0.7-0.8), 67% (CI 0.6-0.8), and 82% (CI 0.8-0.9), respectively. The AUROC curve for BIPS ≥ 2 was 0.75. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of a BIPS ≥ 2 for BBMI requiring surgery in patients with severe alteration in mental status (GCS 3-8) was 70% (CI 0.5-0.9), 92% (CI 0.8-1.0), 82% (CI 0.6-1.0), and 86% (CI 0.7-1.0), respectively. CONCLUSION: This prospective multi-center trial validates BIPS as a predictor of BBMI requiring surgery. Calculation of BIPS during the initial evaluation of trauma patients is a useful adjunct to help general surgeons taking trauma call determine operative versus non-operative management of patients with BBMI including those with severe alteration in mental status.

Use of near-infrared imaging using indocyanine green associates with the lower incidence of postoperative complications for intestinal and mesenteric injury.

Anastomotic leakage after intestinal resection is one of the most serious complications of surgical intervention for hollow viscus injury. Adequate vascular perfusion of the anastomotic site is essential to prevent anastomotic leakage. Near-infrared imaging using indocyanine green (NIR-ICG) is useful for the objective assessment of vascular perfusion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of NIR-ICG with intestinal and mesenteric injuries. This was a retrospective, single-center study of patients undergoing surgery for intestinal and mesenteric injuries. NIR-ICG was used to evaluate vascular perfusion. Postoperative complications were assessed between NIR-ICG and non-NIR-ICG groups.The use of NIR-ICG was associated with a lower incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications with a statistical tendency (p = 0.076). When limited to patients that underwent intestinal resection, the use of NIR-ICG was significantly associated with a lower risk of perioperative complications (p = 0.009). The use of NIR-ICG tended to associate with the lower incidence of postoperative complications after intestinal and mesenteric trauma surgery. NIR-ICG was associated with a significantly lower risk of complications in patients undergoing intestinal resection. The NIR-ICG procedure is simple and quick and is expected to be useful for intestinal and mesenteric trauma.

Blunt abdominal trauma managed with mesenteric embolization: case report.

Blunt abdominal trauma occurs in 20% of polytraumatized patients, of which approximately 5% may have mesenteric lesions. We present a case of a woman suffering from a blunt abdominal trauma, who underwent computed tomography with evidence of hematoma on the right flank, which was controlled by angioembolization of the superior mesenteric artery. Treatment of mesenteric lesions will be determined according to the hemodynamic status of the patient, since in view of stability, a choice can be made between open surgery and embolization, but in case of instability, laparotomy is recommended.

El trauma abdominal cerrado se presenta en el 20% de los pacientes politraumatizados, de los cuales aproximadamente el 5% pueden llegar a tener lesiones mesentéricas. Presentamos el caso de una mujer que sufre un traumatismo abdominal cerrado a la cual se le realizó tomografía computarizada con evidencia de un hematoma en el flanco derecho, que se logra controlar por angioembolización de la arteria mesentérica superior. El tratamiento de las lesiones mesentéricas se determinará según el estado hemodinámico del paciente, pues ante la estabilidad se puede escoger entre cirugía abierta y embolización, pero en caso de inestabilidad se recomienda la laparotomía.

Segmental Bowel Hypoenhancement on CT Predicts Ischemic Mesenteric Laceration After Blunt Trauma.

OBJECTIVE. The objectives of this study were to examine the performance of CT in the diagnosis of ischemic mesenteric laceration after blunt trauma and to assess the predictive value of various CT signs for this injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this retrospective study, consecutive patients with bowel and mesenteric injury diagnosed by CT or surgery from January 2011 through December 2016 were analyzed. Two radiologists evaluated CT images for nine signs of bowel injury. The outcome evaluated was ischemic mesenteric laceration. Univariable analysis followed by logistic regression was performed. RESULTS. The study included 147 patients (96 men and 51 women; median age, 35 years; age range, 23-52 years). Thirty-three patients had surgically confirmed ischemic mesenteric lacerations. CT signs that correlated with ischemic mesenteric laceration were abdominal wall injury, mesenteric contusion, free fluid, segmental bowel hypoenhancement, and bowel hyperenhancement adjacent to a hypoenhancing segment. The regression model developed after inclusion of clinical variables identified two predictors: segmental bowel hypoenhancement (adjusted odds ratio, 22.9 [95% CI, 7.9-66.2; p < .001] for reviewer 1 and 20.7 [95% CI, 7.2-59.0; p < .001] for reviewer 2) and abdominal wall injury (adjusted odds ratio, 5.26 [95% CI, 1.7-15.9; p = .003] for reviewer 1 and 5.3 [95% CI, 1.9-15.0; p = .002] for reviewer 2), which yielded an AUC of 0.87 for predicting injury. For reviewer 1 and reviewer 2, the sensitivities of CT in detecting the injury were 72.3% (95% CI, 54.5-86.7%) and 78.8% (95% CI, 61.0-91.0%), respectively, whereas the specificities were 94.7% (95% CI, 88.9-98.0%), and 92.1% (95% CI, 85.5-96.3%), respectively. CONCLUSION. CT has limited sensitivity but good specificity for detecting ischemic mesenteric laceration, with segmental bowel hypoenhancement considered the most predictive imaging sign.

A rare iatrogenic mesenteric laceration and hemorrhagic shock after colonoscopy. Case report and literature review.

AIM: We report a particular case study of the unexpected death of a 70-year-old caucasian man (affected by crohn's disease) due to the laceration of the ileocolic mesentery and its blood vessels following a colonoscopy procedure carried out only a few hours previously. MATERIAL OF THE STUDY: The autopsy showed that the lacerated blood vessels (i.e. the collateral and terminal branches of the superior mesenteric artery), which run along the section of the intestines between the end of the ileum and the ascending cecum, had led to a severe intra-abdominal hemorrhage and, consequently, fatal hemorrhagic shock. RESULTS: In such cases, both an autopsy and complete histological analysis are essential in order to determine the exact point responsible for the intestinal hemorrhage and to better understand the pathological mechanism involved. DISCUSSION: The unexpected death due to severe peritoneal hemorrhaging following a minimally invasive diagnostic clinical procedure, such as a colonoscopy, is particularly rare in Literature. In fact, amongst the several endoscopy procedures commonly used today, it is one of the safest procedures with the lowest recorded rate of complications. Furthermore, it is an even rarer event that a routine diagnostic colonoscopy can result in a fatality, with only two cases reported. CONCLUSIONS: In the case of sudden death following such a routine diagnostic clinical procedure, the forensic scientist should not disregard the fact that also damage, which appears negligible (caused by the normal procedures used in carrying out a colonoscopy) can actually also result in severe and fatal hemorrhaging. KEY WORDS: Colonoscopy, Fatal hemorrhage, Forensic pathology.

Radiographic and CT features of colonic entrapment due to an omental rent in a dog.

A 2-year-old female spayed Great Dane presented for inappetence and lethargy. Abdominal radiographs revealed a severely gas-distended segment of colon. Computed tomography was performed and characterized a 180° anticlockwise colonic torsion with entrapment in a mesenteric/omental rent without vascular compromise. Exploratory laparotomy confirmed entrapment, but not colonic torsion. Computed tomography provided important information to assist clinical management decisions for this dog with colonic entrapment.

Vascular bowel and mesenteric injury in blunt abdominal trauma: a single centre experience.

AIM: To establish common patterns of injury in vascular bowel and mesenteric injury (VBMI) and to identify any factors that may lead to delayed treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-one patients with blunt VBMI presented to the level 1 trauma centre of the The Royal London Hospital over 5 years. Computed tomography (CT) images were reviewed to identify the specific location of injury and additional features such as seatbelt bruising and lumbar hernias. Surgical reports were reviewed to record any pertinent surgical findings at laparotomy. RESULTS: The commonest mechanism of injury was a restrained car occupant involved in a road traffic collision (49%, n=20). The ileocaecal mesenteric vasculature was most frequently injured (41.5%, n=17), followed by the mid ileum (17.1%, n=7). Seatbelt bruising was identified in 80% of restrained car occupants and lumbar hernias in 22% of all patients with VBMI. CONCLUSION: Restrained car occupants involved in road traffic collisions are at increased risk of VBMI with particular susceptibility of the ileocaecal mesentery. This has implications for the reporting radiologist and trauma surgeon in deciding which patients require careful monitoring for the development of delayed bowel ischaemia.

Surgical intervention for blunt bowel and mesenteric injury: indications and time intervals.

PURPOSE: Decision making in management of blunt bowel and mesenteric injury (BBMI) is difficult. This study aimed to identify indicators for laparotomy and appropriate time intervals to surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our hospital's trauma registry to identify patients with a diagnosis of BBMI from February 2011 to July 2017. Patients requiring therapeutic surgical treatment (OM group) were compared with those who did not (NOM group). Preoperative risk factors for surgery (with p < 0.1 by univariate analysis) were integrated in a multivariate logistic regression model. In the OM group, we identified relevant factors for time intervals to surgical interventions. RESULTS: Among 2808 trauma patients admitted to our hospital, 83 (3.0%) had bowel and mesenteric injury; 6 patients with penetrating trauma, 2 lethal, untreated cases, and 2 patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy were excluded. Finally, 73 patients (47 males), with a mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 23, were included. Results from univariate analysis identified three relevant factors between the OM and NOM groups: ISS score (p = 0.036), hemodynamic instability (p = 0.041), and free air (p = 0.0018). Multivariate analysis revealed one relevant factor, free air (p = 0.0002). Short intervals between hospital admission and intervention were associated with 7-day mortality (p = 0.029), hemodynamic instability (p = 0.0009), focused assessment with sonography for trauma positive (p < 0.0001), and mesenteric extravasation (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Early surgical intervention is essential in cases of hemodynamically unstable BBMI and bowel perforation with free air; nevertheless, it is associated with high mortality. We suggest that prompt transport along with early intervention could significantly lessen mortality.

Lethal mesenteric perforation by osteophytes after blunt abdominal trauma.

A 50 year-old homeless man was found dead the day after he had sustained blunt abdominal trauma during a physical assault. Autopsy revealed no apparent injury to the abdominal wall, but showed a massive hemoperitoneum resulting from a large (8 cm) tear of the mesenteric root. It also revealed prominent and diffuse spinal osteophytes predominating in the lumbar region, where they were fused and formed a large anterior ossified excrescence. The diagnosis of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis was established in the presence of continuous ossification along the anterior aspect of five contiguous vertebral bodies, without any additional features of degenerative disease on imaging. Death was attributed to intra-abdominal hemorrhage due to mesenteric perforation caused by blunt abdominal trauma in the context of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. This pre-existing condition was considered an aggravating factor, as anterior lumbar osteophytosis had made the mesentery more vulnerable to blunt trauma by reducing both the space separating the abdominal wall from the spine and the surface of interaction between the spine and the mesentery. Only a few cases of osteophyte-related visceral injury have been described in the literature. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of lethal abdominal injury caused by osteophytes after blunt trauma.

Evaluation of Bowel and Mesentery in Abdominal Trauma.

Since the advent of multidetecter computed tomography (CT), radiologist sensitivity in detection of traumatic bowel and mesenteric abnormalities has significantly improved. Although several CT signs have been described to identify intestinal injury, accurate interpretation of these findings can remain challenging. Early detection of bowel and mesenteric injury is important as it alters patient management, disposition, and follow-up. This article reviews the common imaging findings of traumatic small bowel and mesenteric injury.

Accuracy of Preoperative MDCT in Patients With Penetrating Abdominal and Pelvic Trauma.

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the overall diagnostic accuracy of preoperative multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in penetrating abdominal and pelvic injuries (PAPI). METHOD AND MATERIALS: We used our hospitals' trauma registry to retrospectively identify patients with PAPI from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2016. Only patients who had a 64-MDCT scan at presentation and subsequently underwent laparotomy or laparoscopy were included in our study cohort. Each finding noted on MDCT was rated using a 5-point scale to indicate certainty of injury, with a score of 0 being definitive. Using surgical findings as the gold standard, the accuracy of radiology reports was analyzed in 2 ways. A κ statistic was calculated to evaluate each pair of values for absolute agreement, and ratings for all organ systems were analyzed using a repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine whether radiology and surgical findings were similar enough to be clinically meaningful. Qualitative review of the radiology and surgical reports focused on the gastrointestinal (GI) tract was conducted. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 38 males and 4 females with a median age of 29 years and a median injury severity score of 15.6. For this study, 12 different organ groups were categorized and analyzed. Of those organ groups, absolute agreement between MDCT and surgical findings was found only for liver and spleen (κ values ranging from 0.2 to 0.5). Additionally, the ANOVA revealed an interaction between finding type and organ system (F 1, 33 = 7.4, P < .001). The most clinically significant discrepancies between MDCT and surgical findings were for gallbladder, bowel, mesenteric, and diaphragmatic injuries. Qualitative review of the GI tract revealed that radiologists can detect significant findings such as presence of injury, however, localization and extent of injury pose a challenge. CONCLUSION: The detection of clinically significant injuries to solid organs in trauma patients with PAPI on 64-MDCT is adequate. However, detection of injury to the remaining organ groups on MDCT, especially bowel, mesentery, and diaphragm, remains a challenge.

Pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor reduces multi-organ injury caused by gut ischemia/reperfusion in mice.

Intestinal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury occurs during transplantation, mesenteric arterial occlusion, trauma and shock, causing systemic inflammation, multiple organ dysfunction and high mortality. Pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor (PSTI), a serine protease inhibitor expressed in gut mucosa may function as a mucosal protective/repair peptide. We examined whether PSTI affected mesenteric I/R-induced injury. Hypoxia/normoxia (H/N) caused 50% drop in cell viability of AGS, RIE1 and Caco-2 cells but PSTI (10 µg/ml) given prior- or during-hypoxic period improved survival by 50% (p<0.01). Similarly, Caco-2 monolayers exposed to H/N had 300% increase in transepithelial permeability, PSTI truncated this by 50% (p<0.01). Mice underwent mesenteric I/R by clamping jejunum, causing severe mucosal injury, increased apoptotic markers and 3-fold increases in plasma IL-6, IL1ß, TNFα, and tissue lipid peroxidation (MDA) and inflammatory infiltration (MPO) levels. Lungs showed similar significant injury and inflammatory infiltrate markers. Smaller increases in MDA and MPO were seen in kidney & liver. PSTI (20 mg/kg) reduced all injury markers by 50-80% (p<0.01). In vitro and in vivo studies showed PSTI reduced pro-apoptotic Caspase 3, 9 and Baxα levels, normalised Bcl2 and caused additional increases in HIF1α, VEGF and Hsp70 above rises caused by I/R alone (all p<0.01). PSTI also prevented reduction of tight junction molecules ZO1 and Claudin1 (all p<0.01) but did not affect increased ICAM-1 caused by I/R in gut or lung. PSTI may be a useful clinical target to prevent I/R injury.

Absorbable suture can be effectively and safely used to close the mesenteric defect in a gastric bypass Sprague-Dawley rat model.

BACKGROUND: To observe if closing the mesenteric defect with absorbable sutures creates a safe adhesion compared to non-absorbable suture after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. METHODS: Rats were randomly assigned to 5 experimental groups according to the different suture materials used in closing the mesenteric defects (Peterson's space) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Group A (control group), Group B (non-absorbable suture, Prolene suture), Group C (biological glue), Group D (non-absorbable suture, polyester suture) and Group E (absorbable suture). All rats were followed up for 8 weeks postoperatively and underwent laparotomy to observe the degree of adhesion and closure of the mesenteric defect. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in the decrease in food intake and body weight among all groups. No internal hernia (IH) occurred in any group. The mesenteric defects of Group A remained completely visible without any closure or adhesion. Multiple gaps were found between the Prolene suture and the mesentery along the suture line in Group B. The mesenteric defects of Group C were complete closed with multiple adhesions of the small intestine and the greater omentum. The mesenteric defects in both Group D and Group E closed completely. The average adhesion scores in Group A and Group B were 0 and 0.33 ± 0.52 respectively. The average adhesion score in group C (3.83 ± 0.41) was higher than the other groups (p<0.05). The average adhesion scores in Group D and E were similar (3.17 ± 0.41 and 3.00 ± 0.00 respectively). CONCLUSION: Absorbable suture created a safe adhesion score between the mesentery which was not inferior to non-absorbable sutures.