Nutrition and Food Security Among Veterans: Operationalizing Nutritional Functioning.

OBJECTIVE: To assess injured military veterans' experiences, beliefs, and daily physical and psychosocial functioning in relation to food and nutrition. DESIGN: We used a convergent mixed-methods study design and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health to operationalize the core constructs and influencing factors related to physical and psychosocial functioning, food, and nutrition. SETTING: Three Veterans Affairs polytrauma rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: Veterans who served in the United States military on or after September 11, 2001, and whose medical diagnoses met the criteria for polytrauma; at least 1 mild traumatic brain injury and at least 1 associated comorbidity (eg, posttraumatic stress disorder, chronic musculoskeletal pain, vestibular disturbances), for a total N of 43. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Themes from survey responses and semistructured interview data were pooled into core constructs and influencing factors. RESULTS: Thirty-seven veterans completed all surveys and participated in recorded interviews. Based on qualitative and quantitative data, veterans' relation to food and nutrition (ie, nutritional functioning) was found to be characterized by 5 core constructs, including food background, nutrition knowledge, meal aptitude, resource navigation, and navigation to/of food spaces. Nutritional functioning was found to be shaped by 5 influencing factors, including injuries and health conditions, ideological and cultural exposures, relations, current beliefs, and current behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional functioning (food background, nutrition knowledge, meal aptitude, resource navigation, navigation to/of food spaces) among injured veterans is complex and shaped by multiple physical, psychosocial, economic, and cultural factors.

[Trauma rehabilitation : Implementation and challenges]. / Traumarehabilitation : Implementation und Herausforderungen.

The current state of posttraumatic rehabilitation in Germany is on the one hand shaped by the efforts of the primary care providers in the acute setting to transfer patients as soon as possible to rehabilitation in accordance with the requirement for a continuous chain of rehabilitation. On the other hand, there are still important treatment gaps due to a lack of options, specialized structures and financing. This has the consequence that severely injured patients sometimes experience substantial difficulties, setbacks and delays on their way back to social participation. This article presents the various phases of rehabilitation and the existing challenges in order to guarantee the universally acknowledged demand for a continuous rehabilitation chain. Reference is made to the missing structures and simultaneously to the necessary continuity of the processes, the quality assurance and the financial prerequisites for new forms of care. This is exemplified by how the continuum of posttraumatic rehabilitation of the German statutory accident insurance with the successful reintegration of trauma victims in work and social life could be a model for insured persons of the statutory health insurance and the German pension fund. The scientific societies of trauma surgery and rehabilitation medicine also promote the model of a differentiated trauma rehabilitation and sustain the idea of a trauma rehabilitation network to increase the chances of the severely injured for the best possible quality of life and social participation.

Veterans with Traumatic Brain Injury-related Ocular Injury and Vision Dysfunction: Vision Rehabilitation Utilization.

SIGNIFICANCE: Visual dysfunction is frequently associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Although evidence regarding the prevalence of symptoms of this population has been published, little is known about health care utilization. A retrospective review of the data derived from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)-mandated "Traumatic Brain Injury Specific Ocular Health and Visual Functioning Examination for Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center Patients" provided a unique opportunity to investigate vision rehabilitation utilization. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to understand (a) the frequency of vision rehabilitation follow-up visits at 6, 12, and 24 months; (b) the association between follow-up and demographic, comorbidity, and severity of TBI covariates as well as ocular and visual symptoms, geographic access, and evaluating facility; and (c) why some veterans did not follow up with recommendations. METHODS: Retrospective and survey designs were used. The sample included 2458 veterans who served in the Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom conflicts and received care at one of the five VA Polytrauma Rehabilitation Centers between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2017. Quantitative and qualitative descriptive analyses and stepwise logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: About 60% of veterans followed up with recommended vision rehabilitation with visits equally split between VA Polytrauma Rehabilitation Centers and community VA facilities. For each 10-year increase in age, there was a corresponding reduction of 12% in the odds of follow-up. Veterans with decreased visual field had 50% greater odds of follow-up than those who did not. Veterans with difficulty reading had 59% greater odds of follow-up than those who did not. Those who had a double vision had 45% greater odds of follow-up than those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the need for vision rehabilitation may extend as long as 2 years after TBI. Access to vision rehabilitation is complicated by the paucity of available neuro-optometric services.

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation in persons with multiple trauma: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in improving functional and psychological outcomes in person with multiple trauma. DATE SOURCES: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using medical and health science electronic databases up to February 2019. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data and assessed study quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklists and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE). DATA SYNTHESIS: One randomized controlled trial, 1 clinical controlled trial and 4 observational studies (1 with 2 reports) were included. Qualitative analysis was used to synthesize the evidence due to the heterogeneity of included trials. The quality of the studies varied (CASP approach); the majority were of "low quality". The findings suggest "very low to moderate" evidence (GRADE) for the effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in improving functional ability and participation. The majority of studies (n = 6) reported functional improvements after multidisciplinary rehabilitation in the short-term. CONCLUSION: The lack of "high-quality" evidence for multidisciplinary rehabilitation in improving outcomes following trauma highlights gaps in the available evidence, signifying the need for more robust studies.

Surgical Treatment of Combined ACL PCL Medial Side Injuries.

The multiple ligament knee injury involving the medial collateral ligament, anterior cruciate ligament, and posterior cruciate ligament is typically the result of a high-energy trauma or knee dislocation event. Optimal treatment strategies are debated, specifically in regard to timing of surgery, reconstruction/repair techniques, and postoperative protocols. This review details the stepwise treatment of these complex patients from diagnosis to postoperative rehabilitation and summarizes the current literature.

Surgical Treatment of Combined ACL, PCL, and Lateral Side Injuries.

A knee dislocation that involves at least 2 of the 4 major ligament groups-such as the anterior cruciate ligament, the posterior cruciate ligament, or the posterolateral corner-is a catastrophic event for an athlete or trauma patient. Careful evaluation of these patients is needed to avoid disastrous outcomes. Surgeons must be cognizant of a number of key treatment concerns-such as tunnel crowding, controversies over graft fixation methods, and sparsity of level I clinical data-to make proper ligament repair decisions. This manuscript will review treatment principles that govern high-quality care of this complex injury.

Employment and vocational rehabilitation experiences among veterans with polytrauma/traumatic brain injury history.

Evidence suggests that Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans with polytrauma/traumatic brain injury (TBI) history and neurobehavioral symptoms may face difficulties returning to work, yet also encounter barriers to accessing, navigating, and engaging in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) vocational rehabilitation programs. This study utilized qualitative interviews and focus groups with veterans with documented polytrauma/TBI history to explore veterans' perceived barriers to employment and vocational rehabilitation program participation, as well as to solicit thoughts regarding interest in an evidence-based vocational rehabilitation program, the Individual Placement and Support model of Supported Employment (IPS-SE). Veterans identified physical, emotional, cognitive, and interpersonal barriers to finding and maintaining work that they described as linked with their polytrauma/TBI symptoms and sequelae. Communication and logistical issues were described as the primary barriers to vocational rehabilitation program access, while barriers to program utilization included eligibility characteristics, fear of losing financial benefits, and a military-cultural belief of self-sufficiency that made help-seeking difficult. Finally, veterans endorsed key aspects of IPS-SE, such as staff serving as translators, advocates, and navigators of the job search and maintenance process. Policy recommendations are addressed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

[Prediction of Return to Work following Multiple Trauma in Patients with ISS of at least 25]. / Prädiktion des Return to Work nach Polytrauma bei Patienten mit einem ISS von 25 und höher.

PURPOSE: Survival rates after severe multiple trauma have continually increased in the last decades. Return to work (RTW) of persons affected by severe multiple trauma is important to assure their quality of life and social participation. Therefore, knowledge about aspects associated with RTW is essential for acute and rehabilitative care and treatment. Aim of the study is to analyze RTW in patients with multiple trauma and to identify predictors for RTW. METHODS: To identify aspects that predict RTW, 84 patients in working age and with ISS ≥ 25 were included in a mono-center study. Data were collected by using routine data of the German TraumaRegister DGU® and POLO chart, a standardized patient-reported outcome assessed during follow-up. Bivariate analyses (Chi-Quadrat-test, Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney-test, t-test) were used to test for associations with RTW. Selected variables were included in a logistic regression model to predict RTW. RESULTS: In total, 58% of patients returned to work during follow-up. Age, duration of treatment in ICU and time between admission and follow-up were selected as predictors for RTW. Self-reported general health was also crucial for RTW in patients, whereas pre-existing comorbidities or other stressful events do not contribute to the prediction of RTW. CONCLUSION: RTW of patients with severe multiple trauma is determined by several factors. Older patients with low general health have problems to return to previous work.

Traumatic brachial plexus injury rehabilitation using neuromuscular electrical muscle stimulation in a polytrauma patient.

We report a 28-year-old man admitted postmotorcycle versus car in September 2017. The patient sustained multiple injuries in both the upper and lower limbs. He sustained a complex brachial plexus injury on his left side and was transferred immediately to Stanmore Hospital to undergo specialist surgery (supraclavicular brachial plexus exploration and neurolysis) to repair his brachial plexus injury. The patient was transferred back to the specialist trauma ward for additional surgeries for his subsequent injuries. Due to the complexity of the injury and surgery the patient was not able to start rehabilitation until six weeks post operation, at which point he was referred to outpatient physiotherapy. Prior to this his left upper limb was in a sling but was instructed to move it as able. The patient commenced his comprehensive physiotherapy programme in January 2018.

Concomitant hip and upper extremity fracture in elderly patients: Prevalence and clinical implications.

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture and upper extremity fracture are most important age-related fracture. However, there have been few reports about the analysis of prevalence or risk factors with concomitant hip and upper extremity fractures. This study aimed to describe the prevalence and clinical implications of the concomitant hip and upper extremity fractures in elderly. METHODS: We evaluate 1018 patients aged >65 years who were surgically treated for femoral neck or intertrochanteric fractures between March 2008 and December 2018. 35 patients (3.4%) with a hip fracture combined upper extremity fracture. All patients were classified into the isolated hip fracture and the concomitant fracture. We analyzed these patients' characteristics such as age, gender, bone mineral density (BMD), body mass index (BMI), Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-K), injury mechanism, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: The most common site of upper extremity fracture was distal radius fracture of 15 patients (42.8%), followed by proximal humeral fracture of 8 (22.8%). Concomitant fractures occurred on the same side in 30 patients (85.7%). The mean age of patients with a concomitant fracture was younger than that of patients with an isolated hip fracture (p < 0.05). Mean preinjury MMSE-K was 22.7 in isolated hip fracture and 25.6 in concomitant fracture patients (p < 0.05). Mean length of hospital stay was statistically significant different between two groups (p < 0.05). According to fracture site of hip, there was no statistically different prevalence of upper extremity fracture in femoral intertrochanteric fracture compared to the neck fracture. CONCLUSION: We found a 3.4% prevalence of concomitant hip and upper extremity fractures. It was found that the younger the age with preserved cognitive ability in elderly patients with a hip fracture, the higher the prevalence of upper extremity fracture. In addition, it is important to keep in mind that patients with a concomitant fracture have a longer hospital stay and difficulty in rehabilitation.

Rehabilitation of the multiple injured patient with spinal cord injury: A systematic review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with multiple injuries including spinal cord injury (SCI) have low survivability. Little is known for the effect of SCI in their rehabilitation process. PURPOSE: To define differences in characteristics and outcomes during the rehabilitation of multiple injured patients with SCI compared to other polytrauma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic libraries provided 425 relevant articles. Applying the criteria, 6 articles were eligible for inclusion in this review. RESULTS: The extracted data show that multiple injured patients with SCI have an increased length of stay (LOS) in rehabilitation. Initial functional levels, as also one- and two-years follow-up are also decreased. Similar results were found comparing SCI patients with or without multiple injuries: SCI patients with multiple injuries have an increased LOS and decreased functional levels compared with SCI patients. Finally, there was nota relevance between the circumstances of the injuries, like acts of terror, and the expected rehabilitation outcome. CONCLUSION: Due to the rarity of eligible articles and the lack of homogenous accessing tools, a meta-analysis was not possible. There is a lack of a universal evaluation strategy or tool, for the severity of the multiple injured patients aiming at the rehabilitation outcome prognosis. Multiple-injured patients with SCI have longer rehabilitation LOS and functional outcomes compared to other polytrauma patients. Prospective studies are needed for evaluation of the differences according to the severity and the complexity of the injuries and the rehabilitation outcome depending on different rehabilitation methods and strategies.

Polytrauma Transitional Rehabilitation in the Veterans Administration: Implementing the Principles of Person-Centered, Participation-Oriented Rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: To review principles of person-centered, participation-oriented (PCPO) rehabilitation and introduce their implementation in Veterans Administration (VA) Polytrauma Transitional Rehabilitation Programs (PTRPs). BACKGROUND: Post-hospital rehabilitation for individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI) has evolved toward PCPO rehabilitation, an approach that makes participation goals identified by the person served and his or her significant others the primary focus of rehabilitation. Goals to reduce impairments and increase activities contribute to the achievement of primary participation goals. Research, primarily in the nonveteran population, confirms the effectiveness of PCPO rehabilitation. OVERVIEW: In the civilian sector, PCPO programs are generally provided locally or regionally in outpatient or community settings to individuals with moderate-severe ABI associated with other traumatic injuries and comorbidities. Because of the geographical dispersion of veterans, the VA provides these services in residential centers serving larger geographical areas. The group of veterans served more often has sustained milder traumatic ABI associated with neuropsychiatric comorbidities, particularly posttraumatic stress disorder and depression. Measuring progress and outcome is important to establish a feedback loop for process improvement. VA PTRPs use state-of-the-science standardized outcome measures and methods for identifying successful cases, that is, the minimal clinically important difference. Vocational reintegration is an important element of PCPO rehabilitation. Articles in this special section detail the development and effectiveness of PTRPs.

Vocational Rehabilitation in the Veterans Health Administration Polytrauma System of Care: Current Practices, Unique Challenges, and Future Directions.

OBJECTIVE/PURPOSE: Veterans and service members (V/SMs) with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and comorbid conditions are treated in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Polytrauma System of Care (PSC). These V/SMs comprise a unique population with distinct needs for restoring community reintegration, including participation in meaningful employment. Low employment rates after TBI vary and are influenced by many factors. Employment is a central aspect of the VHA priority of facilitating adjustment, and addressing vocational needs alongside healthcare is critical to community reintegration. The purpose of this article is to outline current practices of addressing vocational rehabilitation in the PSC, discuss the unique challenges in serving Veterans with polytrauma, and outline future directions to improve vocational services and outcomes. METHODS: Briefly review literature on V/SM with TBI and employment, describe the PSC and VHA vocational programs for V/SM with polytrauma, and synthesize proceedings on vocational rehabilitation from the 2017 VHA "Community Reintegration in the Polytrauma System of Care" meeting. CONCLUSIONS: To advance and expand vocational services the following guidelines were recommended: (1) designing flexible services based on individualized needs, (2) increasing access to vocational services through communication and collaboration, (3) promoting cross-disciplinary education and engagement in vocational care, and (4) systematically tracking employment outcomes.

Cost-effectiveness of an integrated 'fast track' rehabilitation service for multi-trauma patients: A non-randomized clinical trial in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary rehabilitation has been recommended for multi-trauma patients, but there is only low-quality evidence to support its use with these patients. This study examined whether a Supported Fast track multi-Trauma Rehabilitation Service (Fast Track) was cost-effective compared to conventional trauma rehabilitation service (Care As Usual) in patients with multi-trauma from a societal perspective with a one-year follow-up. METHODS: An economic evaluation alongside a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, controlled clinical study, was conducted in the Netherlands. The primary outcome measure was the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Generic Quality of Life and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) of the patients were derived using the Short-form 36 Health Status Questionnaire. Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs) were stated in terms of costs per unit of FIM improvement and costs per QALY. To investigate the uncertainty around the ICERs, non-parametric bootstrapping was used. RESULTS: In total, 132 patients participated, 65 Fast Track patients and 67 Care As Usual patients. Mean total costs per person were €18,918 higher in the Fast Track group than in the Care As Usual group. Average incremental effects on the FIM were 3.7 points (in favor of the Fast Track group) and the incremental (extra) bootstrapped costs were €19,033, resulting in an ICER for cost per FIM improvement of €5,177. Care As Usual dominated Fast Track in cost per QALY as it gave both higher QALYs and lower costs. All sensitivity analyses attested to the robustness of our results. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for multi-trauma patients according to the supported fast track principle is promising but cost-effectiveness evidence remains inconclusive. In terms of functional outcome, Fast Track was more expensive but yielded also more effects compared to the Care As Usual group. Looking at the costs per QALYs, unfavorable ICERs were found. Given the lack of a willingness-to-pay threshold for functional recovery and the relatively short time horizon, it is not possible to draw firm conclusions about the first. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (Current Controlled Trials register: ISRCTN68246661).

Rehabilitation in the Department of Veterans Affairs Polytrauma System of Care: Historical Perspectives.

The purpose of this article is to inform the reader of the historical aspects of the Polytrauma System of Care, understand the solutions that were implemented in addressing the continuum of care needs for service members and veterans, and provide an understanding of ongoing research efforts that will inform future solutions to strategically identified future care needs.

Department of Veterans Affairs Polytrauma Rehabilitation Centers: Inpatient Rehabilitation Management of Combat-Related Polytrauma.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the signature injuries of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. To ensure that rehabilitation care needs of veterans and active duty servicemembers with TBI and polytrauma injuries were met, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) established the Polytrauma System of Care (PSC) in 2005. The 5 VA Polytrauma Rehabilitation Centers provide tertiary, acute inpatient rehabilitation for the PSC. Interdisciplinary treatment teams of multiple rehabilitation disciplines provide the complex, patient-centered care to achieve maximum benefit. After discharge, veterans and servicemembers with TBI and polytrauma receive lifelong support and care through the PSC.

Neurobehavioral Management of the Polytrauma Veteran.

Since the inception of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, an increasing number of veterans have sought treatment from the Department of Veterans Affairs for combat-related injuries. Many veterans experience postconcussive symptoms, traumatic stress, chronic pain, sensory deficits, and/or headaches. The goal of this article was to highlight some of the challenges treatment providers may face, while providing rehabilitation specialists with important evaluation and treatment considerations in working with this population to maximize outcomes for these veterans.

Rehabilitation Assessment and Management of Neurosensory Deficits After Traumatic Brain Injury in the Polytrauma Veteran.

Neurosensory deficits after traumatic brain injury can frequently lead to disability; therefore, diagnosis and treatment are important. Posttraumatic headaches typically resemble migraines and are managed similarly, but adjuvant physical therapy may be beneficial. Sleep-related issues are treated pharmacologically based on the specific sleep-related complaint. Fatigue is difficult to treat; cognitive behavioral therapy and aquatic therapy can be beneficial. Additionally, methylphenidate and modafinil have been used. Peripheral and central vestibular dysfunction causes dizziness and balance dysfunction, and the mainstay of treatment is vestibular physical therapy. Visual dysfunction incorporates numerous different diagnoses, which are frequently treated with specific rehabilitation programs.

Department of Veterans Affairs Polytrauma Telerehabilitation: Twenty-First Century Care.

The use of telehealth for the management of the polytrauma patient provides a unique opportunity to leverage technology to enhance care for a complex patient cohort, to assist in clinical care, and to enhance support for community reintegration for veteran patients. Telehealth connects experts to patients in remote or underserved areas, thereby decreasing a health care disparity. This is especially important when the rehabilitation team is multidisciplinary. The future of telerehabilitation is unknown and implementing virtual care into rehabilitation providers' standard practice will be impeded until state licensure and payment issues are resolved.

Assistive Technology in Polytrauma Rehabilitation.

Assistive technology (AT) is a service or device that provides individuals with polytrauma injuries the chance to engage in their daily activities. AT specialists use the Human Activity Assistive Technology frame of reference to guide their evaluation, treatment, selection, and training process as it also takes into account the context in which AT devices would be used. AT devices include augmentative and alternative communication, electronic cognitive devices, wheeled mobility, electronic aides to daily living, adaptive computer access, and adaptive sports. Within all of these areas of AT, other considerations include accessing the devices, mounting the devices, and integrating the technology when possible.