Long-acting B-2 agonists (LABA) or long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA): which one may be the first option in group A COPD patients?

INTRODUCTION: Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) or beta-2 agonists (LABA) have been recommended for symptom control in group A COPD patients as a first-line bronchodilator treatment in GOLD guidelines. However, there is no mention of priority/superiority between the two treatment options. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of these treatments in this group. METHODS: The study cohort was formed of all subjects from six pulmonology clinics with an initial diagnosis of COPD who were new users of a LAMA or LABA from January 2020 to December 2021. Seventy-six group A COPD patients, in whom LABA or LAMA therapy had been started in the last 1 month as a first-line treatment, were included in our study. Participants were evaluated with spirometry, COPD Assessment Test (CAT), mMRC scale, and St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) for three times (baseline, 6-12th months). RESULTS: There were 76 group A COPD patients with LAMA (67.1%) and LABA (32.9%). The number of patients who improved in CAT score at the end of the first year was significantly higher in patients using LAMA than those using LABA (p = 0.022); the improvement at minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in CAT score of LAMA group at 1st year was also significant (p = 0.044). SGRQ total and impact scores were found to be statistically lower at 1st year compared to baseline in patients using LAMA (p = 0.010 and 0.006, respectively). Significant improvement was detected in CAT and SGRQ scores at the 6th month visit in the LAMA group having emphysema (p = 0.032 and 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSION: According to significant improvements in CAT and SGRQ score, LAMA may be preferred over LABA as a bronchodilator agent in group A COPD patients, especially in emphysema-dominant phenotype.

[Muscarinic M1 and/or M4 receptor agonists as potential novel treatments for psychoses]. / Muscarine 1- en/of 4-receptoragonisten als potentieel nieuwe behandeling voor psychosen.

BACKGROUND: Research suggests that cholinergic muscarinic 1 (M1) and/or muscarinic 4 (M4) receptors may be involved in the pathophysiology of psychotic disorders. Agonistic modulation of these receptors can offer new treatment options. AIM: To provide an overview of current research on the role of cholinergic M1 and M4 receptors in the development and treatment of psychoses, with special attention to the development of new drugs such as xanomeline and emraclidine. METHOD: To obtain an overview, we searched for English-language studies published in PubMed, Embase, and PsycInfo up until June 1, 2023. We examined the role and effects of M1 and/or M4 agonists in schizophrenia. Additionally, we consulted clinical trial registers. RESULTS: Our search strategy resulted in nine published articles on five clinical studies. These studies revealed that reduced presence of M1 receptors, primarily in the frontal cortex, and M4 receptors, primarily in the basal ganglia, are associated with psychoses. M1 and M4 receptors modulate dopaminergic activity in the ventral tegmentum and striatum through various pathways. Several M1 and/or M4 agonists, partial agonists, and positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) have been developed. Drugs exhibiting agonistic activity on M1 and/or M4 receptors, such as xanomeline-trospium (phase 2 and 3 studies) and emraclidine (phase 1b studies), have shown positive effects on cognitive and potentially negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. CONCLUSION: M1 and/or M4 receptor agonists show potential as new treatment strategies for individuals with psychotic disorders. Although initial studies with xanomeline-trospium and emraclidine have shown positive results, further research is needed to assess their long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability before these new medications can be evaluated.

Muscarinic M1 and M4 receptor agonists for schizophrenia: promising candidates for the therapeutic arsenal.

INTRODUCTION: Successful phase 3 trials of KarXT in people with schizophrenia herald a new era of treating the disorder with drugs that do not target the dopamine D2 receptor. The active component of KarXT is xanomeline, a muscarinic (CHRM) M1 and M4 agonist, making muscarinic receptors a viable target for treating schizophrenia. AREAS COVERED: This review covers the process of taking drugs that activate the muscarinic M1 and M4 receptors from conceptualization to the clinic and details the mechanisms by which activating the CHRM1 and 4 can affect the broad spectrum of symptoms experienced by people with schizophrenia. EXPERT OPINION: Schizophrenia is a syndrome which means drugs that activate muscarinic M1 and M4 receptors, as was the case for antipsychotic drugs acting on the dopamine D2 receptor, will not give optimal outcomes in everyone within the syndrome. Thus, it would be ideal to identify people who are responsive to drugs activating the CHRM1 and 4. Given knowledge of the actions of these receptors, it is possible treatment non-response could be restricted to sub-groups within the syndrome who have deficits in cortical CHRM1 or those with one of the cognitive endophenotypes that may be identifiable by changes in the blood transcriptome.

Evidence of trospium's ability to mitigate cholinergic adverse events related to xanomeline: phase 1 study results.

RATIONALE: The M1/M4 preferring muscarinic receptor agonist xanomeline demonstrated antipsychotic and procognitive effects in patients with Alzheimer's disease or schizophrenia in prior studies, but further clinical development was limited by cholinergic adverse events (AEs). KarXT combines xanomeline with the peripherally restricted muscarinic receptor antagonist trospium with the goal of improving tolerability and is in clinical development for schizophrenia and other neuropsychiatric disorders. OBJECTIVE: Test the hypothesis that trospium can mitigate cholinergic AEs associated with xanomeline. METHODS: Healthy volunteers enrolled in this phase 1 (NCT02831231), single-site, 9-day, double-blind comparison of xanomeline alone (n = 33) versus KarXT (n = 35). Rates of five prespecified cholinergic AEs (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, excessive sweating, salivary hypersecretion) were compared between treatment arms. Vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), safety laboratory values, and pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses were assessed. A self-administered visual analog scale (VAS) and clinician-administered scales were employed. RESULTS: Compared with xanomeline alone, KarXT reduced composite incidences of the five a priori selected cholinergic AEs by 46% and each individual AE by ≥ 29%. There were no episodes of syncope in KarXT-treated subjects; two cases occurred in the xanomeline-alone arm. The rate of postural dizziness was 11.4% in the KarXT arm versus 27.2% with xanomeline alone. ECG, vital signs, and laboratory values were not meaningfully different between treatment arms. The VAS and clinician-administered scales tended to favor KarXT. PK analysis revealed that trospium did not affect xanomeline's PK profile. CONCLUSIONS: Trospium was effective in mitigating xanomeline-related cholinergic AEs. KarXT had an improved safety profile compared with xanomeline alone.

M1/M4-Preferring Muscarinic Cholinergic Receptor Agonist Xanomeline Reverses Wake and Arousal Deficits in Nonpathologically Aged Mice.

Degeneration of the cholinergic basal forebrain is implicated in the development of cognitive deficits and sleep/wake architecture disturbances in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Indirect-acting muscarinic cholinergic receptor agonists, such as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs), remain the only FDA-approved treatments for the cognitive impairments observed in AD that target the cholinergic system. Novel direct-acting muscarinic cholinergic receptor agonists also improve cognitive performance in young and aged preclinical species and are currently under clinical development for AD. However, little is known about the effects of direct-acting muscarinic cholinergic receptor agonists on disruptions of sleep/wake architecture and arousal observed in nonpathologically aged rodents, nonhuman primates, and clinical populations. The purpose of the present study was to provide the first assessment of the effects of the direct-acting M1/M4-preferring muscarinic cholinergic receptor agonist xanomeline on sleep/wake architecture and arousal in young and nonpathologically aged mice, in comparison with the AChEI donepezil, when dosed in either the active or inactive phase of the circadian cycle. Xanomeline produced a robust reversal of both wake fragmentation and disruptions in arousal when dosed in the active phase of nonpathologically aged mice. In contrast, donepezil had no effect on either age-related wake fragmentation or arousal deficits when dosed during the active phase. When dosed in the inactive phase, both xanomeline and donepezil produced increases in wake and arousal and decreases in nonrapid eye movement sleep quality and quantity in nonpathologically aged mice. Collectively, these novel findings suggest that direct-acting muscarinic cholinergic agonists such as xanomeline may provide enhanced wakefulness and arousal in nonpathological aging, MCI, and AD patient populations.

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors for psychotic disorders: bench-side to clinic.

Modern interest in muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) activators for schizophrenia began in the 1990s when xanomeline, an M1/M4-preferring mAChR agonist developed for cognitive symptoms of Alzheimer's disease (AD), had unexpected antipsychotic activity. However, strategies to address tolerability concerns associated with activation of peripheral mAChRs were not available at that time. The discovery of specific targeted ligands and combination treatments to reduce peripheral mAChR engagement have advanced the potential of mAChR activators as effective treatments for psychotic disorders. This review provides perspectives on the background of the identification of mAChRs as potential antipsychotics, advances in the preclinical understanding of mAChRs as targets, and the current state of mAChR activators under active clinical development for schizophrenia.

Characterization of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Initiating Single-Inhaler Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist/Long-Acting ß2-Agonist Dual Therapy in a Primary Care Setting in England.

Purpose: Treatment pathways of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receiving single-inhaler dual therapies remain unclear. We aimed to describe characteristics, prescribed treatments, healthcare resource use (HCRU) and costs of patients with COPD who initiated single-inhaler long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting ß2-agonist (LAMA/LABA) dual therapy in primary care in England. Patients and Methods: Retrospective study using linked data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum and Hospital Episode Statistics datasets. Patients with COPD with ≥1 single-inhaler LAMA/LABA prescription between June 2015 and December 2018 (index) were included. Demographic and clinical characteristics, prescribed treatments, HCRU and costs were evaluated in the 12 months pre-index. Data are presented for patients not receiving concomitant inhaled corticosteroids at index (non-triple users). Results: Of 10,991 patients initiating LAMA/LABA, 9888 were non-triple users, of whom 21.3% (n=2109) received aclidinium bromide/formoterol, 18.1% (n=1785) received indacaterol/glycopyrronium, 12.0% (n=1189) received tiotropium bromide/olodaterol and 48.6% (n=4805) received umeclidinium/vilanterol. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar across indexed therapies. LAMA monotherapy was the most frequently prescribed respiratory therapy at 12 (18.4-25.8% of patients) and 3 months (23.9-33.7% of patients) pre-index across indexed therapies; 42.5-59.0% of patients were prescribed no respiratory therapy at these time points. COPD-related HCRU during the 12 months pre-index was similar across indexed therapies (general practitioner consultations: 62.0-68.6% patients; inpatient stays: 19.3-26.1% patients). Pre-index COPD-related costs were similar across indexed therapies, with inpatient stays representing the highest contribution. Mean total direct annual COPD-related costs ranged from £805-£1187. Conclusion: Characteristics of patients newly initiating single-inhaler LAMA/LABA dual therapy were highly consistent across indexed therapies. As half of non-triple users were not receiving respiratory therapy one year prior to LAMA/LABA initiation, there may be an opportunity for early optimization of treatment to relieve clinical burden versus current prescribing patterns in primary care in England.

Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Agonists as Novel Treatments for Schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia remains a challenging disease to treat effectively with current antipsychotic medications due to their limited efficacy across the entire spectrum of core symptoms as well as their often burdensome side-effect profiles and poor tolerability. An unmet need remains for novel, mechanistically unique, and better tolerated therapeutic agents for treating schizophrenia, especially those that treat not only positive symptoms but also the negative and cognitive symptoms of the disease. Almost 25 years ago, the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) agonist xanomeline was reported to reduce psychotic symptoms and improve cognition in patients with Alzheimer's disease. The antipsychotic and procognitive properties of xanomeline were subsequently confirmed in a small study of acutely psychotic patients with chronic schizophrenia. These unexpected clinical findings have prompted considerable efforts across academia and industry to target mAChRs as a new approach to potentially treat schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. The authors discuss recent advances in mAChR biology and pharmacology and the current understanding of the relative roles of the various mAChR subtypes, their downstream cellular effectors, and key neural circuits mediating the reduction in the core symptoms of schizophrenia in patients treated with xanomeline. They also provide an update on the status of novel mAChR agonists currently in development for potential treatment of schizophrenia and other neuropsychiatric disorders.

Biased Profile of Xanomeline at the Recombinant Human M4 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor.

Many Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs are structural analogues of the endogenous (natural) ligands of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). However, it is becoming appreciated that chemically distinct ligands can bind to GPCRs in conformations that lead to different cellular signaling events, a phenomenon termed biased agonism. Despite this, the rigorous experimentation and analysis required to identify biased agonism are often not undertaken in most clinical candidates and go unrealized. Recently, xanomeline, a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) agonist, has entered phase III clinical trials for the treatment of schizophrenia. If successful, xanomeline will be the first novel FDA-approved antipsychotic drug in almost 50 years. Intriguingly, xanomeline's potential for biased agonism at the mAChRs and, in particular, the M4 mAChR, the most promising receptor target for schizophrenia, has not been assessed. Here, we quantify the biased agonism profile of xanomeline and three other mAChR agonists in Chinese hamster ovary cells recombinantly expressing the M4 mAChR. Agonist activity was examined across nine distinct signaling readouts, including the activation of five different G protein subtypes, ERK1/2 phosphorylation, ß-arrestin recruitment, calcium mobilization, and cAMP regulation. Relative to acetylcholine (ACh), xanomeline was biased away from ERK1/2 phosphorylation and calcium mobilization compared to Gαi2 protein activation. These findings likely have important implications for our understanding of the therapeutic action of xanomeline and call for further investigation into the in vivo consequences of biased agonism in drugs targeting the M4 mAChR for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Muscarinic receptors: from clinic to bench to clinic.

Efforts to target muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the brain have been hampered by dose-limiting side effects. In a tour de force of team science, Brown and colleagues have designed a muscarinic agonist that has been optimized to possess properties that could position it to succeed where other agonists have failed.

Triple versus LAMA/LABA combination therapy for Japanese patients with COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: In symptomatic COPD patients with a history of exacerbations, additional treatment with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) to long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) combination therapy is recommended based on the evidence of low incidence of exacerbations but with a caution for pneumonia. However, ethnic differences may affect the response to drugs. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this treatment in the Japanese population (PROSPERO: CRD42020191978). METHODS: We searched relevant randomized control trials and analyzed the exacerbations, quality of life, lung function, and adverse events including pneumonia and mortality as the outcomes of interest. RESULTS: We identified a total of three RCTs (N = 632). Treatment with ICS/LAMA/LABA triple therapy significantly decreased the exacerbations (rate ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.85) and improved the trough FEV1 (mean difference, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.07) compared to LAMA/LABA therapy. However, triple therapy showed a significantly higher incidence of pneumonia compared to LAMA/LABA (odds ratio, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.58 to 7.22). Concerning other adverse events including mortality, there were no significant difference between these therapies. CONCLUSIONS: In the current meta-analysis of the Japanese population, we confirmed that triple therapy causes a higher incidence of pneumonia than LAMA/LABA treatment but is a more preferable treatment since it showed a lower incidence of exacerbations and higher trough FEV1 in patients with symptomatic moderate to severe COPD. However, since the sample sizes were not statistically large enough, further trials involving Japanese patients are needed.

Treatment approaches for the patient with T2 low asthma.

OBJECTIVE: To identify treatment approaches that can be used in the management of patients with asthma who lack significant type 2 inflammation, also called T2 low asthma. DATA SOURCES: Recent expert guideline updates on the management of asthma, recent journal articles and review articles, and foundational journal articles are referenced. STUDY SELECTIONS: This review cites clinical cohort studies of highly characterized patients with asthma, clinical interventional trials of high impact, mechanistic studies relevant to T2 low asthma, and emerging work in this area. RESULTS: T2 low asthma accounts for approximately one-third to one-half of individuals with asthma. Characteristics of participants with T2 low asthma include higher body mass index, cigarette smoking/smoke exposure, relative lack of responsiveness to steroids, less bronchodilator reversibility, and often the presence of neutrophilic inflammation. Multiple available interventions target these characteristics, including standard inhalers, azithromycin, and lifestyle interventions of weight loss and smoking cessation. CONCLUSION: Treatment of T2 low asthma should involve currently available approaches and will benefit from improved definition and understanding of disease pathobiology.

Therapeutic potential of TAK-071, a muscarinic M1 receptor positive allosteric modulator with low cooperativity, for the treatment of cognitive deficits and negative symptoms associated with schizophrenia.

The selective activation of the muscarinic M1 receptor (M1R) may be a promising approach for treating cognitive impairment associated with cholinergic dysfunction. We previously reported that low cooperativity (α-value) is associated with a favorable cholinergic side effect profile of M1R positive allosteric modulators (M1 PAMs), as well as being a crucial factor for the cognitive improvement observed after combining M1 PAMs with donepezil, in rodents. In this study, we preclinically characterized TAK-071, a novel M1 PAM with low cooperativity (α-value = 199), as a new therapy for schizophrenia. We tested TAK-071 in the offspring of polyriboinosinic-polyribocytidylic acid-treated dams, which is a maternal immune activation model of schizophrenia. TAK-071 improved sociability deficits and working memory in this model. In a genetic mouse model of schizophrenia, miR-137 transgenic (Tg) mice, TAK-071 improved deficits in working memory, recognition memory, sociability, and sensorimotor gating. Patients with schizophrenia usually take several antipsychotics to treat positive symptoms. Thus, we also investigated the combined effects of TAK-071 with currently prescribed antipsychotics. Among the 10 antipsychotics tested, only olanzapine and quetiapine showed M1R antagonistic effects, which were counteracted by TAK-071 at possible effective concentrations for cognitive improvement in vitro. Moreover, haloperidol did not affect the ability of TAK-071 to improve working memory in miR-137 Tg mice, suggesting a low risk of losing efficacy when combined with dopamine D2 receptor antagonists. In conclusion, TAK-071 can exert beneficial effects on social behavior and cognitive function and could be a new therapy for schizophrenia.

Reduction of falls in a rat model of PD falls by the M1 PAM TAK-071.

RATIONALE: In addition to the disease-defining motor symptoms, patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) exhibit gait dysfunction, postural instability, and a propensity for falls. These dopamine (DA) replacement-resistant symptoms in part have been attributed to loss of basal forebrain (BF) cholinergic neurons and, in interaction with striatal dopamine (DA) loss, to the resulting disruption of the attentional control of balance and complex movements. Rats with dual cholinergic-DA losses ("DL rats") were previously demonstrated to model PD falls and associated impairments of gait and balance. OBJECTIVES: We previously found that the muscarinic M1-positive allosteric modulator (PAM) TAK-071 improved the attentional performance of rats with BF cholinergic losses. Here, we tested the hypotheses that TAK-071 reduces fall rates in DL rats. RESULTS: Prior to DL surgery, female rats were trained to traverse a rotating straight rod as well as a rod with two zigzag segments. DL rats were refamiliarized with such traversals post-surgery and tested over 7 days on increasingly demanding testing conditions. TAK-071 (0.1, 0.3 mg/kg, p.o.) was administered prior to daily test sessions over this 7-day period. As before, DL rats fell more frequently than sham-operated control rats. Treatment of DL rats with TAK-071 reduced falls from the rotating rod and the rotating zigzag rod, specifically when the angled part of the zigzag segment, upon entering, was at a steep, near vertical angle. CONCLUSIONS: TAK-071 may benefit complex movement control, specifically in situations which disrupt the patterning of forward movement and require the interplay between cognitive and motor functions to modify movement based on information about the state of dynamic surfaces, balance, and gait.

Muscarinic Cholinergic Receptor Agonist and Peripheral Antagonist for Schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: The muscarinic receptor agonist xanomeline has antipsychotic properties and is devoid of dopamine receptor-blocking activity but causes cholinergic adverse events. Trospium is a peripherally restricted muscarinic receptor antagonist that reduces peripheral cholinergic effects of xanomeline. The efficacy and safety of combined xanomeline and trospium in patients with schizophrenia are unknown. METHODS: In this double-blind, phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned patients with schizophrenia in a 1:1 ratio to receive twice-daily xanomeline-trospium (increased to a maximum of 125 mg of xanomeline and 30 mg of trospium per dose) or placebo for 5 weeks. The primary end point was the change from baseline to week 5 in the total score on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS; range, 30 to 210, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms of schizophrenia). Secondary end points were the change in the PANSS positive symptom subscore, the score on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale (range, 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater severity of illness), the change in the PANSS negative symptom subscore, the change in the PANSS Marder negative symptom subscore, and the percentage of patients with a response according to a CGI-S score of 1 or 2. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients were enrolled, with 90 assigned to receive xanomeline-trospium and 92 to receive placebo. The PANSS total score at baseline was 97.7 in the xanomeline-trospium group and 96.6 in the placebo group. The change from baseline to week 5 was -17.4 points with xanomeline-trospium and -5.9 points with placebo (least-squares mean difference, -11.6 points; 95% confidence interval, -16.1 to -7.1; P<0.001). The results for the secondary end points were significantly better in the xanomeline-trospium group than in the placebo group, with the exception of the percentage of patients with a CGI-S response. The most common adverse events in the xanomeline-trospium group were constipation, nausea, dry mouth, dyspepsia, and vomiting. The incidences of somnolence, weight gain, restlessness, and extrapyramidal symptoms were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In a 5-week trial, xanomeline-trospium resulted in a greater decrease in the PANSS total score than placebo but was associated with cholinergic and anticholinergic adverse events. Larger and longer trials are required to determine the efficacy and safety of xanomeline-trospium in patients with schizophrenia. (Funded by Karuna Therapeutics and the Wellcome Trust; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03697252.).

Overcoming Obstacles to Targeting Muscarinic Receptor Signaling in Colorectal Cancer.

Despite great advances in our understanding of the pathobiology of colorectal cancer and the genetic and environmental factors that mitigate its onset and progression, a paucity of effective treatments persists. The five-year survival for advanced, stage IV disease remains substantially less than 20%. This review examines a relatively untapped reservoir of potential therapies to target muscarinic receptor expression, activation, and signaling in colorectal cancer. Most colorectal cancers overexpress M3 muscarinic receptors (M3R), and both in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that activating these receptors stimulates cellular programs that result in colon cancer growth, survival, and spread. In vivo studies using mouse models of intestinal neoplasia have shown that using either genetic or pharmacological approaches to block M3R expression and activation, respectively, attenuates the development and progression of colon cancer. Moreover, both in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that blocking the activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) that are induced selectively by M3R activation, i.e., MMP1 and MMP7, also impedes colon cancer growth and progression. Nonetheless, the widespread expression of muscarinic receptors and MMPs and their importance for many cellular functions raises important concerns about off-target effects and the safety of employing similar strategies in humans. As we highlight in this review, highly selective approaches can overcome these obstacles and permit clinicians to exploit the reliance of colon cancer cells on muscarinic receptors and their downstream signal transduction pathways for therapeutic purposes.

Novel approaches to restore parasympathetic activity to the heart in cardiorespiratory diseases.

Neural control of the heart is regulated by sympathetic and parasympathetic divisions of the autonomic nervous system, both opposing each other to maintain cardiac homeostasis via regulating heart rate, conduction velocity, force of contraction, and coronary blood flow. Sympathetic hyperactivity and diminished parasympathetic activity are the characteristic features of many cardiovascular disease states including hypertension, myocardial ischemia, and arrhythmias that result in heart failure. Restoring parasympathetic activity to the heart has recently been identified as the promising approach to treat such conditions. However, approaches that used vagal nerve stimulation have been shown to be unsuccessful in heart failure. This review focuses on novel chemogenetic approaches used to identify the cardioprotective nature of activating neural points along the vagal pathway (both central and peripheral) while being selectively therapeutic in heart failure and obstructive sleep apnea.

A Review of Pharmacological Presbyopia Treatment.

Presbyopia reduces an individual's ability to perform visual tasks at near distances. It is a global problem, affecting over a billion people worldwide. Contact lenses, glasses, refractive surgery, and intraocular lens surgery are the main modalities in presbyopia treatment, although they all have some disadvantages. Thus, there is an increasing need for effective, easy-to-use, and noninvasive approaches for treating presbyopia while not limiting patients' daily activities. Pharmacological presbyopia treatment as an alternative method has been under investigation in recent years. We reviewed all relevant articles using the keywords "presbyopia," "presbyopia treatment," "pharmacological presbyopia treatment," and "presbyopic corrections" from 2010 to February 9, 2020, and summarized the main results of clinical trials, investigating the drops used for presbyopia treatment.

M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: A therapeutic strategy for symptomatic and disease-modifying effects in Alzheimer's disease?

The M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) plays a crucial role in learning and memory processes and has long been identified as a promising therapeutic target for the improvement of cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD). As such, clinical trials with xanomeline, a mAChR orthosteric agonist, showed an improvement in cognitive and behavioral symptoms associated with AD. Despite this, the clinical utility of xanomeline was hampered by a lack of M1 receptor selectivity and adverse cholinergic responses attributed to activation of peripheral M2 and M3 mAChRs. More recently, efforts have focused on developing more selective M1 compounds via targeting the less-conserved allosteric binding pockets. As such, positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) have emerged as an exciting strategy to achieve exquisite selectivity for the M1 mAChR in order to deliver improvements in cognitive function in AD. Furthermore, over recent years it has become increasingly apparent that M1 therapeutics may also offer disease-modifying effects in AD, due to the modulation of pathogenic amyloid processing. This article will review the progress made in the development of M1 selective ligands for the treatment of cognitive decline in AD, and will discuss the current evidence that selective targeting of the M1 mAChR could also have the potential to modify AD progression.

Muscarinic M1 and M4 receptors: Hypothesis driven drug development for schizophrenia.

The finding that the drug KarXT, a formulation of xanomeline and tropsium which targets muscarinic receptors, has given a positive result in reducing the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia in a phase II trial suggests targeting muscarinic receptors is a new approach to treating the disorder. This review will detail the synergistic interplay between studies to understand the role of muscarinic receptors in the aetiology of schizophrenia and drug development and how this has supported the hypothesis that activating the muscarinic M1 and M4 receptors is critical to the efficacy of KarXT, in schizophrenia. The discovery of an intermediate phenotype within schizophrenia which is characterised by the presence of a marked loss of cortical muscarinic M1 receptors will be reviewed. Highlighted will be progress in understanding the biochemistry of that intermediate phenotype and evidence to suggest that those with the intermediate phenotype may resist treatment with agonist to the orthosteric site on the muscarinic M1 and M4 receptor. Finally, the possibility of using drugs targeting the allosteric binding sites on muscarinic receptors to treat schizophrenia will be discussed. This timely review will therefore highlight how research can influence hypothesis driven drug discovery that should produce new treatments for schizophrenia.