A µ-opioid receptor modulator that works cooperatively with naloxone.

The µ-opioid receptor (µOR) is a well-established target for analgesia1, yet conventional opioid receptor agonists cause serious adverse effects, notably addiction and respiratory depression. These factors have contributed to the current opioid overdose epidemic driven by fentanyl2, a highly potent synthetic opioid. µOR negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) may serve as useful tools in preventing opioid overdose deaths, but promising chemical scaffolds remain elusive. Here we screened a large DNA-encoded chemical library against inactive µOR, counter-screening with active, G-protein and agonist-bound receptor to 'steer' hits towards conformationally selective modulators. We discovered a NAM compound with high and selective enrichment to inactive µOR that enhances the affinity of the key opioid overdose reversal molecule, naloxone. The NAM works cooperatively with naloxone to potently block opioid agonist signalling. Using cryogenic electron microscopy, we demonstrate that the NAM accomplishes this effect by binding a site on the extracellular vestibule in direct contact with naloxone while stabilizing a distinct inactive conformation of the extracellular portions of the second and seventh transmembrane helices. The NAM alters orthosteric ligand kinetics in therapeutically desirable ways and works cooperatively with low doses of naloxone to effectively inhibit various morphine-induced and fentanyl-induced behavioural effects in vivo while minimizing withdrawal behaviours. Our results provide detailed structural insights into the mechanism of negative allosteric modulation of the µOR and demonstrate how this can be exploited in vivo.

Effects of terlipressin and naloxone compared with epinephrine in a rat model of asphyxia-induced cardiac arrest

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the hemodynamic and metabolic effects of terlipressin and naloxone in cardiac arrest. METHODS: Cardiac arrest in rats was induced by asphyxia and maintained for 3.5 minutes. Animals were then resuscitated and randomized into one of six groups: placebo (n = 7), epinephrine (0.02 mg/kg; n = 7), naloxone (1 mg/kg; n = 7) or terlipressin, of which three different doses were tested: 50 µg/kg (TP50; n = 7), 100 µg/kg (TP100; n = 7) and 150 µg/kg (TP150; n = 7). Hemodynamic variables were measured at baseline and at 10 (T10), 20 (T20), 30 (T30), 45 (T45) and 60 (T60) minutes after cardiac arrest. Arterial blood samples were collected at T10, T30 and T60. RESULTS: The mean arterial pressure values in the TP50 group were higher than those in the epinephrine group at T10 (165 vs. 112 mmHg), T20 (160 vs. 82 mmHg), T30 (143 vs. 66 mmHg), T45 (119 vs. 67 mmHg) and T60 (96 vs. 66.8 mmHg). The blood lactate level was lower in the naloxone group than in the epinephrine group at T10 (5.15 vs. 10.5 mmol/L), T30 (2.57 vs. 5.24 mmol/L) and T60 (2.1 vs. 4.1 mmol/L). CONCLUSIONS: In this rat model of asphyxia-induced cardiac arrest, terlipressin and naloxone were effective vasopressors in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and presented better metabolic profiles than epinephrine. Terlipressin provided better hemodynamic stability than epinephrine. .

Spinal Gabapentin and Antinociception: Mechanisms of Action

Spinal gabapentin has been known to show the antinociceptive effect. Although several assumptions have been suggested, mechanisms of action of gabapentin have not been clearly established. The present study was undertaken to examine the action mechanisms of gabapentin at the spinal level. Male SD rats were prepared for intrathecal catheterization. The effect of gabapentin was assessed in the formalin test. After pretreatment with many classes of drugs, changes of effect of gabapentin were examined. General behaviors were also observed. Intrathecal gabapentin produced a suppression of the phase 2 flinching, but not phase 1 in the formalin test. The antinociceptive action of intrathecal gabapentin was reversed by intrathecal NMDA, AMPA, D-serine, CGS 15943, atropine, and naloxone. No antagonism was seen following administration of bicuculline, saclofen, prazosin, yohimbine, mecamylamine, L-leucine, dihydroergocristine, or thapsigargin. Taken together, intrathecal gabapentin attenuated only the facilitated state. At the spinal level, NMDA receptor, AMPA receptor, nonstrychnine site of NMDA receptor, adenosine receptor, muscarinic receptor, and opioid receptor may be involved in the antinociception of gabapentin, but GABA receptor, L-amino acid transporter, adrenergic receptor, nicotinic receptor, serotonin receptor, or calcium may not be involved.