Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 9 de 9
3.
Drug Dev Res ; 75(1): 23-8, 2014 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24648046

The possibility of a public health radiological or nuclear emergency in the United States remains a concern. Media attention focused on lost radioactive sources and international nuclear threats, as well as the potential for accidents in nuclear power facilities (e.g., Windscale, Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima) highlight the need to address this critical national security issue. To date, no drugs have been licensed to mitigate/treat the acute and long-term radiation injuries that would result in the event of large-scale, radiation, or nuclear public health emergency. However, recent evaluation of several candidate radiation medical countermeasures (MCMs) has provided initial proof-of-concept of efficacy. The goal of the Radiation Nuclear Countermeasures Program (RNCP) of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (National Institutes of Health) is to help ensure the government stockpiling of safe and efficacious MCMs to treat radiation injuries, including, but not limited to, hematopoietic, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, cutaneous, renal, cardiovascular, and central nervous systems. In addition to supporting research in these areas, the RNCP continues to fund research and development of decorporation agents targeting internal radionuclide contamination, and biodosimetry platforms (e.g., biomarkers and devices) to assess the levels of an individual's radiation exposure, capabilities that would be critical in a mass casualty scenario. New areas of research within the program include a focus on special populations, especially pediatric and geriatric civilians, as well as combination studies, in which drugs are tested within the context of expected medical care management (e.g., antibiotics and growth factors). Moving forward, challenges facing the RNCP, as well as the entire radiation research field, include further advancement and qualification of animal models, dose conversion from animal models to humans, biomarker identification, and formulation development. This paper provides a review of recent work and collaborations supported by the RNCP.


Emergency Medical Services , National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U.S.) , Program Development/economics , Strategic Stockpile , Animals , Emergency Medical Services/economics , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Humans , National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U.S.)/economics , National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U.S.)/organization & administration , Radioactive Hazard Release , Research Design , Research Support as Topic , Strategic Stockpile/economics , Strategic Stockpile/methods , Strategic Stockpile/organization & administration , Terrorism , United States , Vulnerable Populations
5.
Prog Community Health Partnersh ; 6(3): 311-20, 2012.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22982844

BACKGROUND: Community engagement has been a cornerstone of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)'s HIV/AIDS clinical trials programs since 1990. Stakeholders now consider this critical to success, hence the impetus to develop evaluation approaches. OBJECTIVES: The purpose was to assess the extent to which community advisory boards (CABs) at HIV/AIDS trials sites are being integrated into research activities. METHODS: CABs and research staff (RS) at NIAID research sites were surveyed for how each viewed (a) the frequency of activities indicative of community involvement, (b) the means for identifying, prioritizing, and supporting CAB needs, and (c) mission and operational challenges. RESULTS: Overall, CABs and RS share similar views about the frequency of community involvement activities. Cluster analysis reveals three groups of sites based on activity frequency ratings, including a group notable for CAB-RS discordance. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing differences between community and researcher perceptions about the frequency of and challenges posed by specific engagement activities may prove useful in developing evaluation tools for assessing community engagement in collaborative research settings.


Advisory Committees/organization & administration , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Community-Institutional Relations , HIV Infections/therapy , National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U.S.)/organization & administration , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/therapy , Communication , Community-Based Participatory Research/organization & administration , Cooperative Behavior , Humans , Needs Assessment , United States
7.
Radiat Res ; 177(5): e0025-39, 2012 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22468702

Since 9/11, there have been concerns that terrorists may detonate a radiological or nuclear device in an American city. Aside from several decorporation and blocking agents for use against internal radionuclide contamination, there are currently no medications within the Strategic National Stockpile that are approved to treat the immediate or delayed complications resulting from accidental exposure to radiation. Although the majority of research attention has focused on developing countermeasures that target the bone marrow and gastrointestinal tract, since they represent the most acutely radiosensitive organs, individuals who survive early radiation syndromes will likely suffer late effects in the months that follow. Of particular concern are the delayed effects seen in the lung that play a major role in late mortality seen in radiation-exposed patients and accident victims. To address these concerns, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases convened a workshop to discuss pulmonary model development, mechanisms of radiation-induced lung injury, targets for medical countermeasures development, and end points to evaluate treatment efficacy. Other topics covered included guidance on the challenges of developing and licensing drugs and treatments specific to a radiation lung damage indication. This report reviews the data presented, as well as key points from the ensuing discussion.


Drug Discovery , Lung Diseases/prevention & control , Lung/radiation effects , Models, Animal , National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U.S.)/organization & administration , Nuclear Warfare , Radiation Injuries, Experimental/prevention & control , Radiation-Protective Agents/therapeutic use , Radioactive Hazard Release , Terrorism , Animal Experimentation/standards , Animals , Biomarkers , Combined Modality Therapy , Drug Discovery/organization & administration , Drug Discovery/standards , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Humans , Lung Diseases/drug therapy , Lung Diseases/etiology , Lung Diseases/surgery , Radiation Injuries, Experimental/drug therapy , Radiation Injuries, Experimental/surgery , Radiation Tolerance , Radiation-Protective Agents/classification , Radiation-Protective Agents/supply & distribution , Research Design , Research Support as Topic , Stem Cell Transplantation , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration , Vulnerable Populations
...