Developments in conservative treatment for BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

INTRODUCTION: To reduce the risk of disease recurrence and progression of intermediate and high-risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancers (NMIBCs), intravesical adjuvant treatment with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) represents the standard of care, although up to 50% of patients will eventually recur and up to 20% of them will progress to Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC). Radical Cystectomy (RC) is the treatment of choice in this setting; however, this represents a major and morbid surgery, thus meaning that not all NMIBCs patient could undergo or may refuse this procedure or may refuse. The search for effective bladder sparing strategies in NMIBCs BCG-unresponsive patients is a hot topic in the urologic field. AREAS COVERED: We aimed to review the most important bladder-preserving strategies for BCG unresponsive disease, from those used in the past, even though rarely used nowadays (intravesical chemotherapy with single agents), to current available therapies (e.g. intravesical instillation with Gemcitabine-Docetaxel), and to future upcoming treatments (Oportuzumab Monatox). EXPERT OPINION: At present, bladder-preserving treatments in BCG-unresponsive patients are represented by the use of intravesical instillations, systemic immunotherapies, both with good short-term and modest mid-term efficacy, and numerous clinical trials ongoing, with encouraging initial results, in which patients could be recruited.

Efficacy of conduction hyperthermia in the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Intravesical treatment for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) aims to reduce recurrences and stop progression. Hyperthermia-enhanced chemotherapy with devices like COMBAT BRS, Unithermia, and BR-TRG-I is a promising alternative to conventional Bacillus de Calmette Guerin (BCG) therapy. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the efficacy of hyperthermia generated by conduction devices in the treatment of NMIBC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The review followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. A search was performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility of candidate studies and abstracted data from studies that met the inclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was assessment of recurrence. Secondary objectives included evaluation of treatment progression and safety. RESULTS: Thirty studies meeting inclusion criteria underwent data extraction. In intermediate-risk NMIBC patients, COMBAT versus mitomycin C (MMC) in normothermia revealed no superiority in reducing recurrence or progression. High-risk NMIBC patients using COMBAT achieved similar or superior outcomes to BCG. BR-TRG-I demonstrated superior results over normothermia in intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC patients. Unithermia proved less effective than BCG in high-risk NMIBC. Progression outcomes were promising with COMBAT and BR-TRG-I, but comprehensive analysis was limited due to inconsistent assessment across studies. Adverse events were primarily mild-moderate, with some device-specific differences. CONCLUSIONS: Studies on conduction hyperthermia present great variability, which do not allow us to determine the superiority of 1 device over another in terms of recurrence, progression, and/or adverse effects. Further research with consistent administration protocols is crucial for definitive conclusions.

Performance of the EORTC and CUETO Models to Predict Recurrence and Progression in High-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Spanish Urological Club for Oncological Treatment (CUETO) risk scoring models in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients defined as high risk according to European Association of Urology guidelines and managed based on current recommendations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from 187 high-risk NMIBC patients treated at a tertiary center between July 2010 and November 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. One- and five-year recurrence- and progression-free survival were assessed for each patient using the EORTC and CUETO risk scores. The patients were divided into four risk groups according to their risk scores as low, medium-low, medium-high and high risk, as indicated in the models. Discriminative ability was evaluated with the Harrell's concordance index (c-index). RESULTS: Both risk scoring models overestimated the risk of recurrence and progression at one and five years. Only the prediction of recurrence at five years in the high risk group according to the CUETO model was compatible with our cohort. CUETO (c-indices for recurrence and progression were 0.802 and 0.834, respectively) exhibited better discrimination than EORTC (0.722 for recurrence and 0.752 for progression) in the prediction of disease recurrence and progression. CONCLUSION: The CUETO model was superior to the EORTC model in predicting recurrence and progression and stratifying patients with different prognoses in our high-risk NMIBC patient population treated according to current guideline recommendations. However, both models overestimated the probability of disease recurrence and progression. Only the probability of recurrence at five years in the high-risk group of the CUETO model was compatible with our cohort.

OncoTherad® (MRB-CFI-1) Nanoimmunotherapy: A Promising Strategy to Treat Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-Unresponsive Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Crosstalk among T-Cell CX3CR1, Immune Checkpoints, and the Toll-Like Receptor 4 Signaling Pathway.

This study assessed the safety and efficacy of OncoTherad® (MRB-CFI-1) nanoimmunotherapy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) and explored its mechanisms of action in a bladder cancer microenvironment. A single-arm phase I/II study was conducted with 44 patients with NMIBC who were unresponsive to BCG treatment. Primary outcomes were pathological complete response (pCR) and relapse-free survival (RFS). Secondary outcomes comprised response duration and therapy safety. Patients' mean age was 65 years; 59.1% of them were refractory, 31.8% relapsed, and 9.1% were intolerant to BCG. Moreover, the pCR rate after 24 months reached 72.7% (95% CI), whereas the mean RFS reached 21.4 months. Mean response duration in the pCR group was 14.3 months. No patient developed muscle-invasive or metastatic disease during treatment. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 77.3% of patients, mostly grade 1-2 events. OncoTherad® activated the innate immune system through toll-like receptor 4, leading to increased interferon signaling. This activation played a crucial role in activating CX3CR1+ CD8 T cells, decreasing immune checkpoint molecules, and reversing immunosuppression in the bladder microenvironment. OncoTherad® has proved to be a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, besides showing likely advantages in tumor relapse prevention processes.

Impact of Agent Orange Exposure on Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of Agent Orange (AO) exposure on bladder cancer (BCa) outcomes in patients receiving Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) for non-muscle invasive BCa (NMIBC). METHODS: We retrospectively examined the association between AO exposure in patients with NMIBC in national veterans affairs databases who were being treated with BCG. Patients were diagnosed with NMIBC from 2000 to 2010 with follow-up through 2018. Clinical, pathological, and demographic variables were compared by AO exposure. Associations of AO exposure with recurrence, progression, and cancer-specific survival were performed using Cox proportional hazard models after inverse propensity score weighting and competing risks adjustments. We also assessed the association of AO exposure on grade and stage via multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 7651 patients were identified of which 753 (9.8%) were exposed to AO. The median follow-up time was 130 months. The AO-exposed patients were younger (age 61 vs 71 years, P <.001), but had similar Charlson comorbidity scores and stage/grade distribution as the non-AO exposed patients. AO exposure was not associated with higher grade or stage. In our Cox multivariable analyses, AO exposure was not associated with worse recurrence (hazard ratio (HR) 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-1.10, P = .29), progression (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.86-1.36, P = .51), or cancer-specific survival (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.92-1.87, P = .13). CONCLUSION: AO exposure was not associated with worse oncologic outcomes in patients receiving BCG for NMIBC. While this is reassuring, additional research is needed in other patient populations and disease states to determine if the effect is consistent.