Treatment of Facial Fractures at a Level 1 Trauma Center: Do Medicaid and Non-Medicaid Enrollees Receive the Same Care?

BACKGROUND: Timing of surgical treatment of facial fractures may vary with the patient age, injury type, and presence of polytrauma. Previous studies using national data sets have suggested that trauma patients with government insurance experience fewer operations, longer length of hospital stay (LOS), and worse outcomes compared with privately insured patients. The objective of this study is to compare treatment of facial fractures in patients with and without Medicaid insurance (excluding Medicare). METHODS: All adults with mandibular, orbital, and midface fractures at a Level 1 Trauma Center between 2009 and 2018 were included. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the differences in the frequency of surgery, time to surgery (TTS), LOS, and mortality based on insurance type. RESULTS: The sample included 1541 patients with facial fractures (mandible, midface, orbital), of whom 78.8% were male, and 13.1% (208) were enrolled in Medicaid. Mechanism of injury was predominantly assault for Medicaid enrollees and falls or motor vehicle accidents for non-Medicaid enrollees (P < 0.001). Patients with mandible and midface fractures underwent similar rates of surgical repair. Medicaid enrollees with orbital fractures underwent less frequent surgery for facial fractures (24.8% versus 34.7%, P = 0.0443) and had higher rates of alcohol and drug intoxication compared with non-Medicaid enrollees (42.8% versus 31.6%, P = 0.008). TTS, LOS, and mortality were similar in both groups with facial fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the treatment of facial fractures was similar regardless of the insurance type, but Medicaid enrollees with orbital fractures experienced less frequent surgery for facial fractures. Further studies are needed to identify specific socioeconomic and geographic factors contributing to these disparities in care.

Head injuries in falls from a standing height: do fractures of the orbital roof matter? A prospective autopsy study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the occurrence and characteristics of orbital roof fractures, periorbital hematoma, conjunctival hemorrhage, orbital roof discoloration, and concomitant head injuries in falls from a standing height. METHODS: A prospective autopsy study was performed over a 4-year period (from 2010 to 2013). Subjects who had died due to traumatic brain injury caused by falls from a standing height were included in the study. RESULTS: Fifty cases of ground level falls were recorded. This group consisted of 39 men and 11 women, with an average age of 67.3 ± 13.6 years, and median age of 70 years. Skull fractures originating in the proximity of impact site were found in 47 of 50 individuals, and 22 had isolated orbital roof fractures not connected to the fracture line. Bluish discoloration of the orbital roof was noted in 19 subjects, 14 had periorbital hematomas, and 12 had blotchy or purpura-like conjunctival hemorrhages. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated orbital roof fractures in falls from a standing height are easily detected using a standard autopsy technique, with special regard to careful removal of the dura in the anterior cranial fossa. Our study shows that orbital roof fractures can occur in accidental falls from a standing height and may not be associated with concomitant skull fractures and brain injuries.

Le Fort II fractures are associated with death: a comparison of simple and complex midface fractures.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether complex midface fractures have a greater association with death and intracranial injury than simple midface fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for patients with blunt-mechanism midface fractures who had presented to an urban trauma center from 1998 to 2010. The survival and intracranial injury status was evaluated for patients with simple and complex midface fractures, including Le Fort, naso-orbitoethmoid, and/or zygomaticomaxillary fractures. Intracranial injury included hemorrhage and brainstem injury. Patients with upper face fractures were excluded to minimize confounding. Adjusted relative risk estimates were obtained using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 3,291 patients with midface fractures, 213 (6.3%) died and 693 (21.3%) had an intracranial injury. The cumulative mortality reached 11.6% in patients with complex midface fractures and 5.1% in those with simple midface fractures (P < .001). Patients with complex midface fractures were 57% more likely to die (relative risk = 1.57; P < .005). Specifically, Le Fort II fractures independently conferred a 94% increased risk of death (relative risk = 1.94; P < .01), but Le Fort I and III fractures were not significantly associated with death. Among patients presenting without neurologic impairment, those with Le Fort II and III fractures remained 2.88-fold (P < .01) and 2.54-fold (P < .001) more likely to have an underlying intracranial injury, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Le Fort II fractures are associated with increased mortality. Furthermore, Le Fort II and III fractures are associated with serious intracranial injury, even in the absence of alterations in consciousness. These patients should be monitored with heightened vigilance and followed up closely during hospitalization, regardless of the presenting clinical findings.

The primary treatment of traumatic lesions of the orbital roof.

The possible treatments for dislocated fractures of the orbital roof range from reduction of the fracture fragments, and reconstruction and stabilisation with miniplates, to plastic surgery using autologous bone. Between 1988 and 1994, 105 patients treated in the Department of Neurosurgery of the Landesnervenklinik Salzburg were operated on transcranially for fractures of the orbital roof. The methods of treatment, the timing of treatment, and the results are discussed. It is shown that even in severely injured patients the results were good in 83 patients (79%).