Pericardio bovino tratado con glutaraldehído y liofilizado como materiales para la medialización de cuerdas vocales en modelo animal / Glutaraldehyde-preserved and lyophilized bovine pericardium as materials for medialization of the vocal folds in an animal model

Introducción: El pericardio bovino tratado con glutaraldehído (PBTG) y el pericardio bovino tratado con glutaraldehído liofilizado (PBTGL)ha sido utilizado exitosamente en la reparación de varios defectos anatómicos, pero su eficacia y seguridad como implantes de cuerdas vocales (CV) no se ha descrito. Objetivo: Evaluar la utilidad del PBTG y PBTGL como material para la medialización tiroplástica y valorar los cambios endoscópicos, macroscópicos y microscópicos de las CV posmedialización en un modelo experimental canino. Material y métodos: En 12 perros mestizos, se medializó la CV derecha con pericardio y la izquierda con politetrafluoroetileno (PTFE). Grupo i (n=6): PBTG, y Grupo ii (n=6): PBTGL. Se comparó el manejo quirúrgico de los implantes. Los animales se valoraron clínica y endoscópicamente. Tres meses poscirugía se evaluaron macroscópica y microscópicamente las laringes. Resultados: El PBTG y PBTGL mostraron mejor manejo quirúrgico (Kruskal-Wallis, p=0,005). No se presentaron granulomas, absorción o extrusión del implante en ningún caso endoscópica ni macroscópicamente. Al final del estudio las CV medializadas con PTFE se observaron más engrosadas. Microscópicamente todas las CV formaron una cápsula fibrosa alrededor del implante y una reacción inflamatoria crónica similar, pero las implantadas con PTFE mostraron infiltrado eosinofílico (Kruskal-Wallis, p<0,05). Conclusión: El PBTG y PBTGL pueden ser utilizados para la medialización de las CV debido a que son biocompatibles, de fácil manejo quirúrgico, no se absorben, no migran, ni extruyen y producen una reacción inflamatoria similar a la del PTFE (AU)

Introduction: Glutaraldehyde-preserved bovine pericardium (GBP) and lyophilized GBP (LGBP) have been used successfully in repairing several anatomical defects, but their effectiveness and safety as implants to vocal cords (VC) have not been reported. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of GBP and LGBP as materials for medialization thyroplasty, as well as to assess the endoscopic, macroscopic and microscopic VC changes after medialization in an experimental canine model. Material and methods: In 12 healthy mongrel dogs, the right VC were medialized using pericardium and the left with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Group 1 (n=6): GBP and Group 2 (n=6): LGBP. The surgical manoeuvrability of the implants was compared. The animals were evaluated clinically and endoscopically. Three months after surgery, the larynges were assessed macro- and microscopically. Results: Both GBP and LGBP implants showed better surgical manoeuvrability (Kruskal-Wallis, P=0.005). Endoscopic and macroscopic studies showed no evidence of granulomas, absorption or extrusion of the implant. At the end of the study, greater thickness was observed in VC implanted with PTFE. Microscopically, all the VC developed fibrous capsules surrounding the implants and similar chronic inflammation reaction. The VC implanted with PTFE presented eosinophilic infiltration (Kruskal-Wallis, P<0.05). Conclusion: Both GBP and LGBP can be used as implants for VC medialization because they are biocompatible, have easy surgical manoeuvrability, do not suffer absorption, migration or extrusion and produce inflammation reactions similar to those of PTFE (AU)

Significant association between tooth extrusion and tooth resorption in domestic cats.

Abnormal extrusion of canine teeth is often noted in middle-aged and geriatric domestic cats. The same age group of cats also is commonly affected by tooth resorption (TR). This study explored the relationship between these two phenomena of unknown etiology. Using digital radiography, the distance between the alveolar margin (AM) and cementoenamel junction (CEJ), referred to as the AM-CEJ distance, was measured in clinically and radiographically healthy maxillary canine teeth of 24 TR-affected and 29 TR-free cats. The mean AM-CEJ distance of maxillary canine teeth of cats with and cats without TR was 2.68-mm and 2.22-mm, respectively. An analysis of covariance adjusting for age revealed a significant correlation (p = 0.02) between tooth extrusion and TR. Extrusion of the maxillary canine teeth became clinically apparent when an AM-CEJ distance of 2.5-mm or greater was evident in the absence of horizontal or vertical alveolar bone loss. Based on this criterion, 15 of 24 cats with TR (63.0 %) exhibited extrusion of maxillary canine teeth, compared to 9 of 29 cats without TR (31.0 %). Four extruded and five non-extruded maxillary canine teeth were evaluated histologically. Cementum of extruded teeth was significantly thicker compared to that of non-extruded teeth. Four of 4 canine teeth with extrusion (100 %) showed histological evidence of resorption, compared to 1 of 5 canine teeth without extrusion (20.0 %). These results suggest that tooth extrusion is linked to or may be caused by similar factors responsible for the development of TR.