Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 425
Filtrar
2.
Value Health ; 24(6): 795-803, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34119077

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To experiment with new approaches of collaboration in healthcare delivery, local authorities implement new models of care. Regarding the local decision context of these models, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) may be of added value to cost-utility analysis (CUA), because it covers a wider range of outcomes. This study compares the 2 methods using a side-by-side application. METHODS: A new Dutch model of care, Primary Care Plus (PC+), was used as a case study to compare the results of CUA and MCDA. Data of patients referred to PC+ or care-as-usual were retrieved by questionnaires and administrative databases with a 3-month follow-up. Propensity score matching together with generalized linear regression models was used to reduce confounding. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore uncertainty in the results. RESULTS: Although both methods indicated PC+ as the dominant alternative, complementary differences were observed. MCDA provided additional evidence that PC+ improved access to care (standardized performance score of 0.742 vs 0.670) and that improvement in health-related quality of life was driven by the psychological well-being component (standardized performance score of 0.710 vs 0.704). Furthermore, MCDA estimated the budget required for PC+ to be affordable in addition to preferable (€521.42 per patient). Additionally, MCDA was less sensitive to the utility measures used. CONCLUSIONS: MCDA may facilitate an auditable and transparent evaluation of new models of care by providing additional information on a wider range of outcomes and incorporating affordability. However, more effort is needed to increase the usability of MCDA among local decision makers.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Atención a la Salud/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Modelos Económicos , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Regionalización/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Conducta de Elección , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Satisfacción del Paciente/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Participación de los Interesados
3.
J Urol ; 205(1): 213-218, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32856985

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction is a significant source of morbidity for individuals with spinal cord injury and is managed with a range of treatment options that differ in efficacy, tolerability and cost. The effect of insurance coverage on bladder management, symptoms and quality of life is not known. We hypothesized that private insurance is associated with fewer bladder symptoms and better quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, retrospective analysis of 1,226 surveys collected as part of the prospective Neurogenic Bladder Research Group SCI Registry. We included patients with complete insurance information, which was classified as private or public insurance. The relationship between insurance and bladder management, bladder symptoms and quality of life was modeled using multinomial logistic regression analysis. Spinal cord injury quality of life was measured by the Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score. RESULTS: We identified 654 privately insured and 572 publicly insured individuals. The demographics of these groups differed by race, education, prevalence of chronic pain and bladder management. Publicly insured patients were more likely to be treated with indwelling catheters or spontaneous voiding and less likely to take bladder medication compared to those with private insurance. On multivariate analysis insurance type was not associated with differences in bladder symptoms (total Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score) or in urinary quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: There is an association between insurance coverage and the type of bladder management used following spinal cord injury, as publicly insured patients are more likely to be treated with indwelling catheters. However, insurance status, controlling for bladder management, did not impact bladder symptoms or quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica/terapia , Adulto , Catéteres de Permanencia/economía , Catéteres de Permanencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Seguro de Salud/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/economía , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vejiga Urinaria/inervación , Vejiga Urinaria/fisiopatología , Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica/diagnóstico , Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica/economía , Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica/etiología , Cateterismo Urinario/economía , Cateterismo Urinario/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
J Am Coll Surg ; 232(3): 253-263, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33316424

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The relationship between treatment-related, cost-associated distress "financial toxicity" (FT) and quality-of life (QOL) in breast cancer patients remains poorly characterized. This study leverages validated patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) to analyze the association between FT and QOL and satisfaction among women undergoing ablative breast cancer surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This is a single-institution cross-sectional survey of all female breast cancer patients (>18 years old) who underwent lumpectomy or mastectomy between January 2018 and June 2019. FT was measured via the 11-item COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) instrument. The BREAST-Q and SF-12 were used to asses condition-specific and global QOL, respectively. Responses were linked with demographic and clinical data. Pearson correlation coefficient and multivariable regression were used to examine associations. RESULTS: Our analytical sample consisted of 532 patients; mean age 58, mostly white (76.7%), employed (63.7%), married/committed (73.7%), with 64.3% undergoing reconstruction. Median household income was $80,000 to $120,000/year, and mean COST score was 28.0. After multivariable adjustment, a positive relationship for all outcomes was noted; lower COST (greater cost-associated distress) was associated with lower BREAST-Q and SF-12 scores. This relationship was strongest for BREAST-Q psychosocial well-being, for which we observed a 0.89 (95% CI 0.76-1.03) change per unit change in COST score. CONCLUSIONS: Financial toxicity captured in this study correlates with statistically significant and clinically important differences in BREAST-Q psychosocial well-being, patient satisfaction with reconstructed breasts, and SF-12 global mental and physical quality of life. Treatment costs should be included in the shared decision-making for breast cancer surgery. Future prospective outcomes research should integrate COST.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Carcinoma/cirugía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Mastectomía/economía , Satisfacción del Paciente/economía , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Carcinoma/economía , Carcinoma/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Mastectomía/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Texas
5.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur ; ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print)2020 Jul 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32633907

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to examine whether patient readmission rates are associated with patient satisfaction and Medicare reimbursement rates in the US hospitals. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The Hospital Compare database was obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in the US. A total of 2,711 acute care hospitals were analyzed for this present study. The data included patient satisfaction surveys, hospital 30-days readmission ratios for heart failure and pneumonia patients and related payments. Exploratory factor analysis was applied in the first stage to operationalize constructs for scale development. Partial least squares (PLS) modeling analysis via Smart-PLS was utilized for testing the hypotheses. FINDINGS: Results indicated that data provided from the Hospital Compare database for the acute care hospitals accurately reflect quality outcomes. Nevertheless, the Medicare Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) did not penalize the hospitals when patients reported lower satisfaction via the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The findings suggest that a high-readmission rate is not associated with lower payment. Such results appear to conflict with the goals of value-based purchasing programs, which seek to penalize hospitals financially for higher readmission rates.


Asunto(s)
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./economía , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Satisfacción del Paciente/economía , Economía Hospitalaria , Humanos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Compra Basada en Calidad
6.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32290712

RESUMEN

There are a number of physical restrictions that develop in the course of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). While loss of speech and motor control may be partially compensated by the support of assistive devices, swallowing difficulty and respiratory insufficiency require medical interventions (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, noninvasive, and invasive ventilation). Based on the data collected within the NEEDSinALS study, we found major differences in personal satisfaction with the financing, healthcare provision, medical infrastructure, and regulations of German and Polish ALS patients, despite minor differences in economic burden caused by the disease. In order to explain this phenomenon, we thoroughly reviewed the legal basis, structure and organization of the healthcare systems in Germany and Poland to determine the range of obstacles in the everyday lives of patients and their caregivers that are attempting to attain an assistive device or care after the start of medical interventions.


Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/epidemiología , Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/terapia , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Seguro de Salud/tendencias , Satisfacción del Paciente , Dispositivos de Autoayuda/tendencias , Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/economía , Cuidadores/economía , Cuidadores/tendencias , Atención a la Salud/economía , Gastrostomía/economía , Gastrostomía/tendencias , Alemania/epidemiología , Personal de Salud/economía , Personal de Salud/tendencias , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/economía , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/tendencias , Humanos , Seguro por Discapacidad/economía , Seguro por Discapacidad/tendencias , Seguro de Salud/economía , Satisfacción del Paciente/economía , Polonia/epidemiología , Dispositivos de Autoayuda/economía
7.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) ; 92(3): 241-246, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31821578

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The number of individuals requesting medical treatment for gender dysphoria has increased significantly within the past years. Our purpose was to examine current biographic and socio-demographic characteristics and aspects of legal gender reassignment. DESIGN: Medical files from n = 350 individuals of a German Endocrine outpatient clinic were collected from 2009 to 2017 and analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: Ratio of transwomen to transmen equates to 1:1.89 with a remarkable increase of transmen by the year 2013, showing a reversal of gender distribution compared with previous studies for the first time. Use of illegal substances or self-initiated hormone therapy was rare (4.6 and 2.1%). Satisfaction with gender-affirming hormone therapy was significantly higher in transmen than in transwomen (100% vs 96.2%, P = .005). Use of antidepressants declined significantly after onset of hormone treatment in transmen (13% vs 7%; P = .007). The number of individuals with a graduation diploma was only about half as high as in the general population (14.3% vs 27.3%), whereas unemployment rate was more than twice as high (14% vs 6.9%). Median latency between application for legal gender reassignment and definitive court decision was 9 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide possible indications for a decline of psychosocial burden in individuals diagnosed with gender dysphoria over the last years. However, affected individuals are still limited in their occupational and financial opportunities as well as by a complex and expensive procedure of legal gender reassignment in Germany.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Disforia de Género/epidemiología , Disforia de Género/terapia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Adolescente , Adulto , Barreras de Comunicación , Femenino , Disforia de Género/economía , Disforia de Género/psicología , Alemania/epidemiología , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ocupaciones/economía , Ocupaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente/economía , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos de Reasignación de Sexo/economía , Procedimientos de Reasignación de Sexo/psicología , Procedimientos de Reasignación de Sexo/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Personas Transgénero/psicología , Personas Transgénero/estadística & datos numéricos , Transexualidad/economía , Transexualidad/epidemiología , Transexualidad/psicología , Transexualidad/terapia , Adulto Joven
8.
Diabet Med ; 37(4): 665-673, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31701566

RESUMEN

AIMS: To explore the auxiliary psychosocial effects of a monetary reinforcement intervention targeting self-monitoring of blood glucose among young people with Type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Sixty young people with Type 1 diabetes, HbA1c concentrations between 58 and 119 mmol/mol (7.5-13.0%), and average self-monitoring of blood glucose <4 times per day were randomized to either enhanced usual care or a 24-week intervention of monetary rewards for self-monitoring of blood glucose and associated behaviours (e.g. uploading glucose meters). Data were collected from the young people and their parents at baseline, during the intervention (6, 12 and 24 weeks) and after the intervention (36 weeks). RESULTS: Linear mixed models were used to evaluate the intervention effects on psychosocial outcomes, adjusting for corresponding baseline levels and potential moderation by baseline level. The intervention reduced diabetes distress at week 6 among young people who had average and high baseline distress. It also reduced diabetes distress at weeks 12 and 24 among those with low baseline distress. The intervention also reduced young person-reported diabetes-related family conflict and diabetes-related interference among those with high baseline scores in these areas; however, the intervention worsened young person-reported diabetes interference among those with low baseline interference. Effects were medium-sized and time-limited. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate predominantly positive impacts of monetary reinforcement interventions on psychosocial outcomes, although effects varied by outcome and time point. Whereas early improvements in diabetes distress were observed for all who received the intervention, improvements in other areas varied according to the level of psychosocial challenge at baseline. Incorporating psychosocial interventions may bolster and maintain effects over time.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangre , Reembolso de Incentivo , Refuerzo en Psicología , Automanejo/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Glucemia/metabolismo , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea/economía , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea/psicología , Niño , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/terapia , Conflicto Familiar/economía , Conflicto Familiar/psicología , Femenino , Donaciones , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Relaciones Padres-Hijo , Satisfacción del Paciente/economía , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Funcionamiento Psicosocial , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Reembolso de Incentivo/economía , Autoinforme , Automanejo/economía , Nivel de Atención , Adulto Joven
9.
J Knee Surg ; 33(1): 48-52, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30593082

RESUMEN

Decreasing postoperative pain for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients has been an area of continued effort for healthcare providers. These efforts have been incentivized by legislative reform, which ties reimbursement for hospitals and providers to patient perception of care. Press Ganey (PG) surveys quantify patient satisfaction, and the "pain management" domain is thought to be the best metric for assessing pain intensity. Therefore, these responses are important, as they are used to guide further improvements in healthcare delivery. This study analyzes which PG survey domains are truly associated with pain intensity in the immediate postoperative period following TKA. We queried our PG database for all primary TKA patients between November 2012 and January 2015, yielding a total of 214 patients. Multivariate regression analysis was performed utilizing pain intensity as the dependent variable. Predictor variables included body mass index (BMI), Charlson's comorbidity index, opioid consumption, and PG survey domains. Patient ratings of "communication with doctors" (B = 58.147; p = 0.001), "responsiveness of hospital staff" (B = - 62.663; p = 0.041), "communication about medicines" (B= -45.037; p < 0.001), and "hospital environment" (B = 69.342; p = 0.017) were associated with patient pain intensity. We found survey domains, other than "pain management," were associated with pain intensity. Efforts to improve outcomes and satisfaction should focus on staff education and communication. The current method for measuring patient satisfaction and reimbursement should be critically assessed and redesigned to better reflect true patient experiences.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/economía , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo del Dolor/economía , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Satisfacción del Paciente/economía , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Reembolso de Incentivo
10.
J Vasc Access ; 21(2): 154-160, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31347438

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In a previous trial, in-line filtration significantly prevented postoperative phlebitis associated with short peripheral venous cannulation. This study aims to describe the cost-effectiveness of in-line filtration in reducing phlebitis and examine patients' perception of in-hospital vascular access management with and without in-line filtration. METHODS: We analysed costs associated with in-line filtration: these data were prospectively recorded during the previous trial. Furthermore, we performed a follow-up for all the 268 patients enrolled in this trial. Among these, 213 patients responded and completed 6 months after hospital discharge questionnaires evaluating the perception of and satisfaction with the management of their vascular access. RESULTS: In-line filtration group required 95.60€ more than the no-filtration group (a mean of € 0.71/patient). In terms of satisfaction with the perioperative management of their short peripheral venous cannulation, 110 (82%) and 103 (76.9%) patients, respectively, for in-line filtration and control group, completed this survey. Within in-line filtration group, 97.3% of patients were satisfied/strongly satisfied; if compared with previous experiences on short peripheral venous cannulation, 11% of them recognised in-line filtration as a relevant causative factor in determining their satisfaction. Among patients within the control group, 93.2% were satisfied/strongly satisfied, although up to 30% of them had experienced postoperative phlebitis. At the qualitative interview, they recognised no difference than previous experiences on short peripheral venous cannulation, and mentioned postoperative phlebitis as a common event that 'normally occurs' during a hospital stay. CONCLUSION: In-line filtration is cost-effective in preventing postoperative phlebitis, and it seems to contribute to increasing patient satisfaction and reducing short peripheral venous cannulation-related discomfort.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico/economía , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentación , Filtración/economía , Filtración/instrumentación , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Satisfacción del Paciente/economía , Flebitis/economía , Flebitis/prevención & control , Anciano , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Flebitis/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
11.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 36: 101258, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31472419

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine, the remote delivery of health care services, increases access to care for patients with mobility or geographic limitations. Virtual house calls (VHCs) are one type of telemedicine in which clinical visits are conducted remotely using an audio-visual connection with the patient at home. Use of VHCs is more established in other neurologic disorders but is only recently being formally evaluated in multiple sclerosis (MS). This randomized crossover study systematically assessed VHCs compared with in-clinic visits in persons with MS. METHODS: Recruitment occurred in a university based MS clinic. Each subject completed one VHC and one in-clinic follow-up visit. A 1:1 randomization determined whether the VHC or in-clinic follow-up visit occurred first. Baseline surveys included demographics and MS history; post-visit surveys elicited subject responses regarding each visit type to assess feasibility, satisfaction, and cost differences. Outcomes were compared using t-tests for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for proportions. RESULTS: Thirty-six participants completed both study visits and both post-visit surveys. VHC feasibility was demonstrated by a lack of statistically significant difference in the number of completed VHCs as compared with in-clinic visits. VHCs provided both cost and time savings to participants. The majority of participants reported that they would recommend telemedicine visits to others (97.1%) and rated it easy to connect via telemedicine (94.3%). In qualitative comments, participants expressed appreciation for VHCs due to convenience and similarity to in-clinic visits. CONCLUSIONS: VHCs were found to be feasible, cost-effective, and appealing to persons with MS and physicians, supporting their utility as a care delivery method for MS.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Esclerosis Múltiple/diagnóstico , Examen Neurológico , Visita a Consultorio Médico , Satisfacción del Paciente , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud , Consulta Remota , Adulto , Estudios Cruzados , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple/economía , Examen Neurológico/economía , Visita a Consultorio Médico/economía , Satisfacción del Paciente/economía , Consulta Remota/economía
12.
Bone Joint J ; 101-B(7): 860-866, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31256664

RESUMEN

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of age on the cost-effectiveness of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 112 patients were prospectively monitored for two years after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH), the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D). Complications and use of healthcare resources were recorded. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used to express the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Propensity score-matching was used to compare those aged below and above 65 years of age. Satisfaction was determined using the Net Promoter Score (NPS). Linear regression was used to identify variables that influenced the outcome at two years postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients (82.1%) completed the follow-up. Their mean age was 59.5 years (sd 9.7, 41 to 78). There were significant improvements in the mean DASH (preoperative 47.6 vs one-year 15.3; p < 0.001) and OSS scores (26.5 vs 40.5; p < 0.001). Functional improvements were maintained with no significant change between one and two years postoperatively. The mean preoperative EQ-5D was 0.54 increasing to 0.81 at one year (p < 0.001) and maintained at 0.86, two years postoperatively. There was no significant difference between those aged below or above 65 years of age with regards to postoperative shoulder function or EQ-5D gains. Smoking was the only characteristic that significantly adversely influenced the EQ-5D at two years postoperatively (p = 0.005). A total of 87 were promoters and five were passive, giving a mean NPS of 95 (87/92). The total mean cost per patient was £3646.94 and the mean EQ-5D difference at one year was 0.2691, giving a mean ICER of £13 552.36/QALY. At two years, this decreased further to £5694.78/QALY. This was comparable for those aged below or above 65 years of age (£5209.91 vs £5525.67). Smokers had an ICER that was four times more expensive. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair results in excellent patient satisfaction and cost-effectiveness, regardless of age. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:860-866.


Asunto(s)
Artroscopía/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente/economía , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Prospectivos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reino Unido
13.
Infect Dis Poverty ; 8(1): 44, 2019 Jun 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31182164

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) prevalence is closely associated with poverty in China, and poor patients face more barriers to treatment. Using an insurance-based approach, the China-Gates TB program Phase II was implemented between 2012 and 2014 in three cities in China to improve access to TB care and reduce the financial burden on patients, particularly among the poor. This study aims to assess the program effects on service use, and its equity impact across different income groups. METHODS: Data from 788 and 775 patients at baseline and final evaluation were available for analysis respectively. Inpatient and outpatient service utilization, treatment adherence, and patient satisfaction were assessed before and after the program, across different income groups (extreme poverty, moderate poverty and non-poverty), and in various program cities, using descriptive statistics and multi-variate regression models. Key stakeholder interviews were conducted to qualitatively evaluate program implementation and impacts. RESULTS: After program implementation, the hospital admission rate increased more for the extreme poverty group (48.5 to 70.7%) and moderate poverty group (45.0 to 68.1%), compared to the non-poverty group (52.9 to 64.3%). The largest increase in the number of outpatient visits was also for the extreme poverty group (4.6 to 5.7). The proportion of patients with good medication adherence increased by 15 percentage points in the extreme poverty group and by ten percentage points in the other groups. Satisfaction rates were high in all groups. Qualitative feedback from stakeholders also suggested that increased reimbursement rates, easier reimbursement procedures, and allowance improved patients' service utilization. Implementation of case-based payment made service provision more compliant to clinical pathways. CONCLUSION: Patients in extreme or moderate poverty benefited more from the program compared to a non-poverty group, indicating improved equity in TB service access. The pro-poor design of the program provides important lessons to other TB programs in China and other countries to better address TB care for the poor.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Satisfacción del Paciente , Tuberculosis/economía , Tuberculosis/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Antituberculosos/economía , Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico , China , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente/economía , Pobreza/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tuberculosis/tratamiento farmacológico
14.
J Pain ; 20(11): 1317-1327, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31071447

RESUMEN

Many recommended nonpharmacologic therapies for patients with chronic spinal pain require visits to providers such as acupuncturists and chiropractors. Little information is available to inform third-party payers' coverage policies regarding ongoing use of these therapies. This study offers contingent valuation-based estimates of patient willingness to pay (WTP) for pain reductions from a large (n = 1,583) sample of patients using ongoing chiropractic care to manage their chronic low back and neck pain. Average WTP estimates were $45.98 (45.8) per month per 1-point reduction in current pain for chronic low back pain and $37.32 (38.0) for chronic neck pain. These estimates met a variety of validity checks including that individuals' values define a downward-sloping demand curve for these services. Comparing these WTP estimates with patients' actual use of chiropractic care over the next 3 months indicates that these patients are likely "buying" perceived pain reductions from what they believe their pain would have been if they didn't see their chiropractor-that is, they value maintenance of their current mild pain levels. These results provide some evidence for copay levels and their relationship to patient demand, but call into question ongoing coverage policies that require the documentation of continued improvement or of experienced clinical deterioration with treatment withdrawal. PERSPECTIVE: This study provides estimates of reported WTP for pain reduction from a large sample of patients using chiropractic care to manage their chronic spinal pain and compares these estimates to what these patients do for care over the next 3 months, to inform coverage policies for ongoing care.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar/economía , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Manipulación Quiropráctica/economía , Dolor de Cuello/economía , Dolor de Cuello/terapia , Satisfacción del Paciente/economía , Adulto , Dolor Crónico/economía , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo del Dolor/economía
15.
Health Serv Res ; 54(4): 930-939, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31025723

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To develop and assess the reliability and validity of composite measures of reasons for disenrollment from Medicare Advantage (MA) and prescription drug plans (PDPs). DATA SOURCE: Medicare beneficiaries who responded to the Medicare Advantage and Prescription Drug Plan Disenrollment Reasons Survey. STUDY DESIGN: Separate multilevel factor analyses of MA and PDP data suggested groupings of survey items to form composite measures, for which internal consistency and interunit reliability were estimated. The association of each composite with an overall plan rating was examined to evaluate criterion validity. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Five composites were identified: financial reasons for disenrollment; problems with prescription drug benefits and coverage; problems getting information and help from the plan; problems getting needed care, coverage, and cost information; and problems with coverage of doctors and hospitals. Beneficiary-level internal consistency reliability exceeded 0.70 for all but one composite (financial reasons); plan-level internal consistency reliability exceeded 0.80 for all composites; average interunit reliability for plans with ≥ 30 survey completes exceeded 0.75 for 3 of 5 composites. As expected, greater endorsement of reasons for disenrollment was associated with lower overall plan ratings. CONCLUSIONS: The Disenrollment Reasons Survey provides a reliable and valid assessment of beneficiaries' reasons for leaving their plans. Multiple reasons for disenrollment may indicate especially poor experiences.


Asunto(s)
Medicare Part C/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare Part D/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comunicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Satisfacción del Paciente/economía , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estados Unidos
16.
Am J Prev Med ; 56(4): 563-570, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30898222

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluates the effect of program and incentive characteristics on satisfaction with incentives and perceived impact of incentives on behavior change among Medicaid beneficiaries who participated in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicaid Incentives for Prevention of Chronic Diseases program. METHODS: In 2014-2015, an English- and Spanish-language survey was administered to Medicaid Incentives for Prevention of Chronic Diseases program participants about their satisfaction with incentives and perceived impact of incentives. Completed surveys were received from 2,276 eligible sample members (response rate=52.7%). In 2016-2017, multilevel, multivariable, ordinal logistic regression models were performed to examine program characteristics that predict outcomes, while controlling for respondent characteristics. RESULTS: Medicaid Incentives for Prevention of Chronic Diseases participants were satisfied with program incentives. Most survey respondents strongly agreed that they liked getting incentives for taking care of their health (78%), they were happy with the incentives overall (75%), the incentives were fair (73%), and they liked how often they received incentives (67%). Participants in programs delivered by telephone reported higher satisfaction with incentives compared with those in programs delivered in person. However, participants in programs delivered both in person and by telephone were more likely to perceive a positive impact of incentives. Incentive form was a significant predictor of satisfaction with incentives but not of incentive impact. Dollar amount of incentives influenced satisfaction with incentives and impact of incentives. CONCLUSIONS: Program delivery method, incentive form, and incentive magnitude are important characteristics to consider when designing incentive programs. Incentive programs can consider providing modest incentive amounts to achieve self-reported impact on behavior change.


Asunto(s)
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./economía , Enfermedad Crónica/prevención & control , Promoción de la Salud/economía , Motivación , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Crónica/economía , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Promoción de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/economía , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Participación del Paciente/economía , Participación del Paciente/psicología , Participación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente/economía , Reembolso de Incentivo/economía , Reembolso de Incentivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Autoinforme/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
17.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 143(3): 734-742, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30817644

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Online reviews increasingly influence patients' decision-making. This is the first systematic, quantitative analysis of online reviews for abdominoplasty. METHODS: Reviews for abdominoplasty were sampled from RealSelf, Yelp, and Google for six major metropolitan areas. A standard social sciences framework known as grounded theory was used to evaluate factors affecting satisfaction. The relative importance of factors was quantified using odds ratios. RESULTS: Seven hundred ninety-four reviews met inclusion criteria. There was significant geographic variation with respect to number of reviews (p < 0.01) and average rating (p = 0.014). The authors identified 10 statistically significant themes affecting satisfaction. Of these, aesthetic outcome was the most mentioned theme [n = 368 (46.3 percent)] and the most dominant driver of satisfaction. Interactions with staff had the second highest odds ratio, driven by the fact that all negative staff interactions led to negative reviews. Postoperative care had the next highest odds ratio, and was demonstrated to counteract the negative effects of poor surgical outcomes on satisfaction. The occurrence of a surgical complication and the cost of surgery were least associated with satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis is the first to use quantitative methods to identify dominant and nondominant factors affecting patient satisfaction in cosmetic surgery. The authors found that aesthetic outcome, staff interactions, and postoperative diligence were the most critical factors affecting satisfaction in abdominoplasty, whereas postoperative complications and cost were least important. Understanding the relative importance of factors may help to improve and protect one's online reputation.


Asunto(s)
Abdominoplastia/estadística & datos numéricos , Toma de Decisiones , Estética , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Abdominoplastia/efectos adversos , Abdominoplastia/economía , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Teoría Fundamentada , Humanos , Internet/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente/economía , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Cuidados Posoperatorios/psicología , Cuidados Posoperatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Cirujanos/psicología
18.
PLoS One ; 14(2): e0210693, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30726297

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are many reasons for mothers not receiving modern obstetric care, being dissatisfied by health care deliveries is one of the major factors. There are limited studies about maternal satisfaction with labor and delivery care services in Ethiopia and particularly in the study area. Therefore, the aim of this study was to better understand client satisfaction on existing labor and delivery care service and associated factors among mothers who gave birth in the University of Gondar Teaching Hospital, Ethiopia. METHODS: This institution based cross-sectional study was conducted at the University of Gondar Referral Hospital. 593 mothers who gave birth between July and September 2016 were enrolled. Study participants were selected by systematic random sampling. A standardized, interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect data. Descriptive and summary statistics were performed. A linear regression model was fitted and variables having a P value of ≤0.05 in the multivariable model were considered statistically significant. RESULT: Overall, 31.3% of mothers were satisfied by the existing labor and delivery care. Living in rural areas (-2.9%; 95% CI: -5.75,-0.12) and the presence of a co-morbidity (-3.2%; 95%CI:-5.70, -0.72) were the factor which have a negative influence on maternal satisfaction. On the other hand, travel time to reach to the hospital (hours) (0.79%; 95% CI: 0.07, 1.52), birth by episiotomy or assisted vaginal delivery (6.3%; 95%CI: 1.56, 11.04), and receiving cost-free maternal health services (6.66%; 95%CI: 3.31, 10.01) were the factors that had positive influence. CONCLUSION: The level of satisfaction of laboring mothers with the labor and delivery care services was poor. Rural residency and chronic medical co-morbidity were negatively associated with level of satisfaction while travel time, mode of delivery, and payment free delivery service had a statistically significant positive influence on satisfaction.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Madres/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Perinatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Etiopía , Femenino , Hospitales de Enseñanza/economía , Hospitales de Enseñanza/organización & administración , Humanos , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente/economía , Atención Perinatal/economía , Atención Perinatal/organización & administración , Embarazo , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
19.
J Gen Intern Med ; 34(6): 884-892, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30783877

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Disparities in health outcome exist among patients according to socioeconomic status. However, little is known regarding the differences in healthcare experiences across the various levels of income of patients. In a nationally representative US adult population, we evaluate the differences in healthcare experiences based on patient level of income. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the differences in patient healthcare experiences based on level of income. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 68,447 individuals (mean age, 48 ± 18 years; 55% female) representing 176.8 million US adults, who had an established healthcare provider in the 2010-2013 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey cohort. This retrospective study examined the differences in all five patient-reported healthcare experience measures (access to care, provider responsiveness, patient-provider communication, shared decision-making, and patient satisfaction) under the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey. We examined the relationship between patient income and their healthcare experience. RESULTS: Overall, 32% of the study participants were high-income earners while 23% had very-low income. Lower income was consistently associated with poor patient report on healthcare experience. Compared with those with high income, very-low-income-earning participants had 1.63 times greater odds (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.45-1.82) of experiencing difficulty accessing care, had 1.34 times higher odds (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.25-1.45) of experiencing poor communication, had higher odds (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.46-1.92) of experiencing delays in healthcare delivery, and were more likely to report poor provider satisfaction (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.37-1.61). CONCLUSION: Lower income-earning patients have poorer healthcare experience in all aspects of access and quality of care. Targeted policies focusing on improving communication, engagement, and satisfaction are needed to enhance patient healthcare experience for this vulnerable population.


Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Renta/tendencias , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente/economía , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas/economía , Encuestas Epidemiológicas/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
20.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 176: 127-132, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30557766

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Growing relationships between industry related financial payments and physicians have become an increasingly controversial topic as they relate to clinical judgment and patient care. Our objective is to analyze and quantify the effects of physician reported industry payments on the patient experience and patient satisfaction as defined by Physician Rating Websites (PRW). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed physician-reported industry payments received by neurosurgeons over four consecutive years as defined by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (PPSA). All board-certified neurosurgeons on three widely used PRWs were further identified. Data was collected on average rating, number of ratings and composite ratings. Demographic, training-related and practice-related data were also collected. Each physician was identified and matched to their individually reported payments from the PPSA database. RESULTS: Receiving higher amounts of industrial payments had no correlation to average PRW ratings, however was associated with receiving higher composite PRW ratings (p = 0.0389). Higher composite ratings (p = 0.0389), decreasing age (p = 0.005), being male (OR 1.7960, p = 0.005), completing a fellowship (OR 1.3310, p = 0.0085), having a more complete profile (OR 1.1121, p = 0.0057) and speaking more languages (OR 1.1253, p = 0.03802) all were correlated with receiving more total monetary payments. Training at a top 25 residency program was predictive of being in the bottom quartile of total monetary payments received (OR 1.676, p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Patient experience as defined by PRW ratings are likely not strongly influenced by industry related monetary payments, however some relationship may exist. Further study is needed to determine the true relationship between industry related monetary payments and the patient experience.


Asunto(s)
Industrias/estadística & datos numéricos , Neurocirujanos/economía , Satisfacción del Paciente/economía , Médicos/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neurocirujanos/educación , Neurocirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Preceptoría/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA