Incremento de la rotación del residente de pediatría por el centro de salud, ¿una opción para mitigar la crisis de la pediatría de atención primaria? / Increasing rotation of the pediatric resident in primary care is an option to mitigate the crisis in primary care pediatrics?

No disponible

The social role of pediatrics in the past and present times.

Pediatrics and society are closely related. This link is as old as the history of Pediatrics, and dates to the second half of the eighteenth century. The vocation of the first European pediatric schools, indeed, was clinical and scientific, as well as social. The founding fathers of Pediatrics were scientists of great talent, and many of them benefactors and philanthropists. They spent their lives assisting the suffering childhood, and became promoters and organizers of social securities for the poorest and most vulnerable categories. The attention to the problems of abandonment was closely linked to study, prevention, and treatment of pathologies (especially infectious, deficiency and neurological ones). The profile and activity of pediatricians grew in the following decades after the birth of the first pediatric schools. The University institutions contributed to provide a further impulse to childcare as well as cultural authority, also thanks to the foundation of the first chairs and scientific journals of Pediatrics. The relevance and prestige of the studies performed rapidly spread throughout Europe, and also reached our country, contributing to a progressive and relevant improvement in the quality of children's care, and in the meantime to the decrease of neonatal and infant mortality rates.Today's pediatricians, as in the past, must spend his efforts to face the needs of children and their families, be their social receptor, interpreter if necessary, and credible and authoritative interlocutor beside institutions. The current coronavirus pandemic dramatically exposed social inequalities and inequities. In this new scenario, the pediatrician's role of defender of all children becomes even more necessary and indispensable. Here we trace the historical steps which led to the birth and development of pediatrics, as independent medical discipline with ethical and social vocation. Its rise within the University institutions is analyzed, as well as the contribution of the greatest European and Italian masters. Finally, the role of today's pediatrician is described, his responsibilities also in dealing with new health critical issues, related to the biological, cultural, and psychological changes of the patients of present days. He must have holistic competences, to effectively take care of all children. In addition, he must socially act to guarantee the best possible context for the well-being of the child.

Paediatric surgical response to an 'adult' COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has dramatically affected global healthcare systems. We aimed to determine the response of our paediatric surgical fraternity to a disease that overwhelmingly affects adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study over 6 weeks during a federally mandated lockdown. Using snowball sampling, we recruited paediatric surgeons, trainees and medical officers from paediatric surgical units in Malaysia. The anonymous online questionnaire covered sociodemographic information, changes in patient care, redeployment, concerns regarding family members, and impact on training. Mental well-being was assessed using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). Kruskal-Wallis, ANOVA and multiple regression analysis was used, with significance level 0.05. RESULTS: Of the 129 eligible participants, 100(77%) responded. Junior doctors had clinically higher levels of depression, anxiety, and stress. Age <30 years was significantly associated with anxiety. Junior doctors believed that redeployment led to loss of surgical skills (p<0.001) and trainees felt that clinical application of knowledge had reduced (p<0.020). CONCLUSION: Specific to our paediatric surgical community, this study highlights areas of concern, particularly among junior doctors. It is likely that recurrent cycles of the pandemic will occur soon. These issues must be addressed to preserve the mental and emotional well-being of all health care workers.

Diagnosing and managing childhood absence epilepsy by telemedicine.

The diagnosis of childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) is typically based on history and description of spells, supported by an office-based positive hyperventilation test and confirmed by routine electroencephalography (EEG). In the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, many pediatric neurologists have switched to telemedicine visits for nonemergent outpatient evaluations. We present a series of children diagnosed as having CAE on the basis of a positive hyperventilation test performed during remote televisits. Several of these children were begun on treatment for CAE prior to obtaining an EEG, with significant seizure reduction. Our series documents the feasibility of CAE diagnosis and management by telemedicine.

Managing Granulomatous-Lymphocytic Interstitial Lung Disease in Common Variable Immunodeficiency Disorders: e-GLILDnet International Clinicians Survey.

Background: Granulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (GLILD) is a rare, potentially severe pulmonary complication of common variable immunodeficiency disorders (CVID). Informative clinical trials and consensus on management are lacking. Aims: The European GLILD network (e-GLILDnet) aims to describe how GLILD is currently managed in clinical practice and to determine the main uncertainties and unmet needs regarding diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Methods: The e-GLILDnet collaborators developed and conducted an online survey facilitated by the European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) between February-April 2020. Results were analyzed using SPSS. Results: One hundred and sixty-one responses from adult and pediatric pulmonologists and immunologists from 47 countries were analyzed. Respondents treated a median of 27 (interquartile range, IQR 82-maximum 500) CVID patients, of which a median of 5 (IQR 8-max 200) had GLILD. Most respondents experienced difficulties in establishing the diagnosis of GLILD and only 31 (19%) had access to a standardized protocol. There was little uniformity in diagnostic or therapeutic interventions. Fewer than 40% of respondents saw a definite need for biopsy in all cases or performed bronchoalveolar lavage for diagnostics. Sixty-six percent used glucocorticosteroids for remission-induction and 47% for maintenance therapy; azathioprine, rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil were the most frequently prescribed steroid-sparing agents. Pulmonary function tests were the preferred modality for monitoring patients during follow-up. Conclusions: These data demonstrate an urgent need for clinical studies to provide more evidence for an international consensus regarding management of GLILD. These studies will need to address optimal procedures for definite diagnosis and a better understanding of the pathogenesis of GLILD in order to provide individualized treatment options. Non-availability of well-established standardized protocols risks endangering patients.

Contraceptive Counseling in the Postpartum Period: Could Pediatricians Have a Role?

INTRODUCTION: Unplanned pregnancies lead to adverse health outcomes and contribute to economic burdens. A lack of continuity and consistency in immediate postpartum care may be a contributor. The most frequent postpartum medical encounters occur with the child's pediatric health care provider, which represents an opportunity to discuss postpartum contraception. Therefore, our objective was to evaluate postpartum family planning knowledge and behavior in women, and to assess the potential acceptability of a pediatrician-delivered intervention to improve knowledge of and convenient access to contraception among postpartum women. METHODS: This was a non-interventional pilot study that employed survey and interview methodology. RESULTS: Women attending pediatric visits for their newborn or infant (N = 346) were surveyed; 35 were interviewed. On average, respondents were 27 years old (SD = 6), 6 months postpartum (SD = 5), and resumed sex 8 weeks after delivery (SD = 6). Of those who had resumed sex, 68% were not using contraception at the time. However, only 18% of survey respondents wanted to have another child. Few exhibited accurate knowledge of birth spacing or long acting reversible contraception. Most interviewees (86%) supported the idea of pediatricians providing contraceptive counseling. Concerns identified included whether it was "allowable" and pediatrician's lack of knowledge of complex maternal health histories. DISCUSSION: This study highlights a gap between contraceptive need and provision in postpartum women. However, the findings suggest women's willingness to engage in conversations with their child's pediatrician about family planning. Future research should assess the feasibility and impact of integrating postpartum counseling into pediatric visits.

Use of Standing Orders for Vaccination Among Pediatricians.

OBJECTIVES: Standing orders are an effective way to increase vaccination rates, yet little is known about how pediatricians use this strategy for childhood immunizations. We assessed current use of, barriers to using, and factors associated with use of standing orders for vaccination among pediatricians. METHODS: Internet and mail survey from June 2017 to September 2017 among a nationally representative sample of pediatricians. In the principal component analysis of barrier items, we identified 2 factors: physician responsibility and concerns about office processes. A multivariable analysis that included barrier scales and physician and/or practice characteristics was used to identify factors associated with use of standing orders. RESULTS: The response rate was 79% (372 of 471); 59% of respondents reported using standing orders. The most commonly identified barriers among nonusers were concern that patients may mistakenly receive the wrong vaccine (68%), concern that patients prefer to speak with the physician about a vaccine before receiving it (62%), and belief that it is important for the physician to be the person who recommends a vaccine to patients (57%). These 3 items also made up the physician responsibility barrier factor. Respondents with higher physician responsibility scores were less likely to use standing orders (risk ratio: 0.59 [95% confidence interval: 0.53-0.66] per point increase). System-level decision-making about vaccines, suburban or rural location, and lower concerns about office processes scores were each associated with use of standing orders in the bivariate, but not the multivariable, analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Among pediatricians, use of standing orders for vaccination is far from universal. Interventions to increase use of standing orders should address physicians' attitudinal barriers as well as organizational factors.

Trends in Pediatric Malpractice Claims 1987-2015: Results From the Periodic Survey of Fellows.

BACKGROUND: Pediatricians are less frequently sued than other physicians. When suits are successful, however, the average payout is higher. Little is known about changes in the risk of litigation over time. We sought to characterize malpractice lawsuit trends for pediatricians over time. METHODS: The Periodic Survey is a national random sample survey of American Academy of Pediatrics members. Seven surveys between 1987 and 2015 asked questions regarding malpractice (n = 5731). Bivariate and multivariable analyses examined trends and factors associated with risk and outcome of malpractice claims and lawsuits. Descriptive analyses examined potential change in indemnity amount over time. RESULTS: In 2015, 21% of pediatricians reported ever having been the subject of any claim or lawsuit, down from a peak of 33% in 1990. Report of successful outcomes in the most-recent suit trended upward between 1987 and 2015, greatest in 2015 at 58%. Median indemnity was unchanged, averaging $128 000 in 2018 dollars. In multivariate analysis, male sex, hospital-based subspecialty (neonatology, pediatric critical care, pediatric emergency medicine, and hospital medicine), longer career, and more work hours were associated with a greater risk of malpractice claim. CONCLUSIONS: From 1987 to 2015, the proportion of pediatricians sued has decreased and median indemnity has remained unchanged. Male pediatricians and hospital-based subspecialists were more likely to have been sued. Greater knowledge of the epidemiology of malpractice claims against pediatricians is valuable because it can impact practice arrangements, advise risk-management decisions, influence quality and safety projects, and provide data to guide advocacy for appropriate tort reform and future research.

Transition of patients with childhood onset epilepsy: Perspectives from pediatric and adult neurologists.

Transition from pediatric to adult care systems is a major challenge in the management of adolescents with epilepsy. The comparison of pediatric and adult physicians' points of view on this issue is scarcely described. The aim of this study was to understand pediatric and adult neurologists' experience and opinions on transition in epilepsy in France. We investigate the age at which they usually transfer patients, their opinion on the factors that positively or negatively impact transition, on the help provided during this transition period, and their propositions to improve this process. We prepared a targeted questionnaire with two versions, one adapted for neurologists and the other for child neurologists. The questionnaires were diffused through the Reference Centre for Rare Epilepsies, the French Chapter of the League Against Epilepsy, the French Association for Office-based Neurologists, and the French Pediatric Neurology Society. A total of sixty-eight physicians involved mostly in epilepsy care answered this questionnaire: 39 child neurologists and 29 neurologists. Questionnaires were filled at 96.8%. Twenty-six child neurologists followed patients aged over 18 years (70%), and 18 neurologists followed patients under the age of 12 years (66.6%). Cognitive impairment in childhood led significantly to a later transfer to adult care. The major factors believed to delay the transfer were attachment between child neurologists and families as reported in 96.3% by neurologists and in 81.1% by child neurologists, p = 0.07 and lack of adaptation of adult neurology facilities to adolescents especially with intellectual disability (59.3% neurologists, 75.7% child neurologists, p = 0.16). Factors that helped a transfer around 18-19 years were mainly pharmacoresistant epilepsy (71% for neurologists vs. 19% for child neurologists, p < 105) and pregnancy (72% for child neurologists versus 50% for neurologists, p = 0.08). Factors that negatively impacted transition were the lack of information about daily life in adulthood (driving license, contraception, sexuality, carrier guidance, etc.), the weak transition preparation in pediatric system, the lack of knowledge of pediatric epilepsy syndromes, and the lack of global support for patients with intellectual disability and multidisciplinary care needs in adult system. Both groups proposed joint clinics (>65% of providers) and development of care networks between pediatric and adult care for patients with epilepsy (>55%) to improve transition as well as introducing courses on transition. Few physicians were aware of transition and transfer recommendations. Although child and adult neurologists still have some preconceived beliefs, they were able to identify the strengths and weaknesses of both care systems paving the way for proposals to improve transition and transfer of patients with epilepsy from pediatric to adult care.

Medical education in pediatric rheumatology-unique challenges and opportunities.

Pediatric rheumatology faces workforce shortages in both developed and developing regions of the world resulting in suboptimal care of children with chronic rheumatic diseases. In addition to outlining the structure of formal rheumatology training programs in North America and Europe, we attempt to summarize various strategies being implemented with success in several parts of the world to help close the gap via innovative learning strategies. We discuss the important role of professional organizations in leading this effort.

Engagement in research among pediatric subspecialists at the time of enrollment in maintenance of certification, 2009-2016.

BACKGROUND: Amid concerns about the pediatrician-scientist workforce, we hypothesized that declining numbers of pediatric subspecialists devote at least 25% of their professional time to research with fewer younger and female pediatricians engaged in research over the study period. METHODS: Board-certified pediatricians enrolling online in the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP's) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program October 2009 through 2016 were invited to complete a survey with questions about the allocation of their professional time. Responses from individuals in the 14 ABP-certified subspecialties were analyzed. The number and proportions of respondents devoting 25-49% and 50% or more of professional time to research were calculated over time. Age and gender were also examined. RESULTS: We analyzed 21,367 responses over 8 years. A small number of pediatric subspecialists engaged in research with 5.2-6.7% devoting 25-49% and 5.6-8.4% at least 50% of their professional time to research across subspecialties. There was no discernable increase or decrease over time or pattern by age or gender. CONCLUSION: Less than 10% of pediatric medical subspecialists devote at least 50% of their professional time to research. Efforts to promote research among pediatric subspecialists have not increased the size of the population that reports engaging in research at this level.