Factors of Pelvic Infection and Death in Patients with Open Pelvic Fractures and Rectal Injuries.

BACKGROUND: Open pelvic fractures associated with rectal injuries are uncommon. They often cause serious pelvic infection, even death. This combination of injuries has been reviewed infrequently. Herein, we report factors associated with pelvic infection and death in a group of patients with open pelvic fractures and concurrent rectal injuries. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with open pelvic fractures and rectal injuries who were treated at our institution from January 2010-April 2014. From the medical records, age, gender, Injury Severity Score (ISS), cause of fracture, associated injuries, classification of the fracture, degree of soft-tissue injury, Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), packed red blood cells (PRBCs) needed, presence/absence of shock, early colostomy (yes or no), drainage (yes or no), and rectal washout (yes or no) were extracted. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed to determine the association between risk factors and pelvic infection or death. RESULTS: Twenty patients were identified. Pelvic infection occurred in 50% (n = 10) of the patients. Four patients suffered septicemia, and three patients died of multiple organ dysfunction. The mortality rate thus was 15%. According to the univariable analysis, the patients in whom pelvic infection developed had shock, RTS ≤8, GCS ≤8, blood transfusion ≥10 units in the first 24 h, no colostomy, or Gustilo grade III soft-tissue injury. According to the multivariable analysis, shock and absence of colostomy were independently associated with pelvic infection. By univariable analysis, the only factor associated with death was RTS ≤8. CONCLUSION: The incidence of pelvic infection was lower in patients having early colostomy (p < 0.05). Patients with shock had a higher risk of pelvic infection, and we recommend aggressive measures to treat these patients. According to our results, RTS ≤8 could be a predictor of poor outcomes in patients with open pelvic fracture and concurrent rectal injury. Open reduction and internal fixation after extensive debridement is recommended in patients with unstable pelvic fractures.

Factors associated with failure in managing pelvic sepsis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)--a multivariate analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic sepsis is known to cause a detrimental outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). The aim of this study was to examine potential factors associated with failure in managing pelvic sepsis after IPAA. METHODS: We performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis on 2518 IPAA patients between 1983 and 2005. Failure was defined as pouch failure, the need for a permanent ileostomy, or mortality as a result of sepsis. There were 157 patients (6.2%) with pelvic sepsis after IPAA. These involved anastomotic leak 34% (54/157) and fistula 25% (40/157). There were 5 mortalities related to sepsis. Mean age at surgery was 38.1 +/- 14.4 years and mean follow-up was 5.5 +/- 4.7 years. RESULTS: Pouches were saved in 75.8% patients. Univariate analysis identified early sepsis (P = .040), preoperative steroid use (P = .007), and need for percutaneous drainage (P = .004) as significant factors associated with treatment success. Factors associated with failure were hypertension (P = .026), hand-sewn anastomosis (P = .038), associated fistula (P = .0003), need for transanal drainage (P = .0002), need for laparotomy to control septic complications (P < .0001), delayed ileostomy closure (P = .0003), and need for a new diverting ileostomy (P < .0001). By using multivariate analysis with selected covariates, significant factors associated with failure were associated fistula (P = .0013), need for transanal drainage (P = .003), delayed ileostomy closure (P = .022), need for a new ileostomy diversion (P = .004), and hypertension (P = .039). We developed a predictive scoring system for failure to use in management plans and decision-making for the treatment of septic complications of IPAA. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic sepsis after IPAA has a significant impact on pouch failure. This predictive model for failure may play an important role in providing risk estimates for successful outcomes.