A Case of Drug-induced Cutaneous Toxicity Observed in Cynomolgus Monkeys.

The purpose of this article is to describe a case of drug-induced cutaneous toxicity observed in cynomolgus monkeys and to introduce approaches attempted in order to elucidate mechanisms. The test article was a small molecule with a ubiquitously distributed target, especially in rapidly dividing cells, and which modulated cell cycle regulation. After 7 consecutive days of oral dosing, animals developed multifocal skin lesions. The lesions were characterized clinically by vesicles and scabs formation and were distributed mainly in thin-skinned areas of the body including the cheek, chest, abdomen, and inner limbs. Microscopically, the lesions were confirmed as epidermal vesicle formation and ulceration. Immunohistochemical staining revealed that the levels within the epidermis where separation (vesicle formation) occurred were not consistent. The differential diagnoses for vesicular skin lesions and our efforts to elucidate the mechanism of toxicity using in-house database searches and immunohistochemistry are discussed. To the best of our knowledge, similar cutaneous toxicity has not been reported previously, although there are reports of other types of cutaneous toxicities. Understanding the mechanisms of the toxicity is very important when assessing human relevancy during drug development. Our investigative approach can be utilized when unusual skin toxicities are observed in the future.

Toxicological evaluation of isopropylparaben and isobutylparaben mixture in Sprague-Dawley rats following 28 days of dermal exposure.

The alkyl esters of p-hydroxybenzoic acid (Parabens) have been of concern due to their probable endocrine disrupting property especially in baby consumer products. The safety of parabens for use as a preservative in cosmetics has come into controversy, and thus consumer demand for paraben-free products is ever increasing. Thus, more comprehensive studies are needed to conclusively determine the safety of the multiple prolonged exposure to parabens with cosmetic ingredients. This study was conducted to investigate the potential repeated 28 days dermal toxicity (50, 100, 300, or 600 mg/kg bw/day) of isopropylparaben (IPP), isobutylparaben (IBP), or the mixture of IPP and IBP in rats. There were no significant changes in body and organ weights in any group. However, histopathological examinations showed that weak or moderate skin damages were observed in female rats by macroscopic and microscopic evaluations. In female rats, no observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) of IPP with no skin lesion and IBP for skin hyperkeratosis, were estimated to be 600 mg/kg bw/day, and 50 mg/kg bw/day, respectively. With regard skin hyperkeratosis, the lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) of the mixture of IPP and IBP was estimated to be 50 mg/kg bw/day. Analysis of six serum hormones (estrogen, testosterone, insulin, T3, TSH, or FSH) in animals showed that only FSH was dose-dependently decreased in the mixture groups of 100 mg/kg bw/day or higher. These data suggest that the mixture of IPP and IBP showed a synergistic dermal toxicity in rats and should be considered for future use in consumer products.

Comparison of cytotoxicity in vitro and irritation in vivo for aqueous and oily solutions of surfactants.

The in vivo model on rabbit eyes and the in vitro cytotoxicity on fibroblasts were used to compare irritation effect of aqueous and oily (Miglyol 812) solutions of surfactants. Tween 20, Tween 80 and Cremophor EL were tested in different concentrations (0.1, 1 or 5%) and the in vitro test demonstrated that surfactants in oil are less cytotoxic than in aqueous solutions. In the in vivo study, the aqueous solutions of surfactants were characterized as non-irritant while small changes in conjunctiva were observed after application the oily solutions of surfactants and the preparations were classified as slightly irritant, however this effect was similar when Miglyol was applied alone. In conclusion, it is reported that the MTT assay does not correlate well with the Draize scores.

Diphoterine chemical splash decontamination solution: skin sensitization study in the guinea pig.

Diphoterine is an active eye/skin chemical splash decontamination solution. It was evaluated for sensitization potential in the guinea pig with primary induction (day 1, intradermal injection), sensitization (day 9, topical application), and challenge (day 22, topical application). Allergenicity degree at 24 and 48 hours was based on the percentage of animals showing a reaction. Under these conditions, no irritation was noted at 24 and 48 hours in negative controls and in animals treated with Diphoterine during the challenge phase. Diphoterine showed no allergenicity at 24 and 48 hours. In this study, Diphoterine lacked sensitizing capacity in the guinea pig.

Microcosm evaluation of the effects of an eight pharmaceutical mixture to the aquatic macrophytes Lemna gibba and Myriophyllum sibiricum.

Pharmaceuticals have been detected in surface waters of the US and Europe, originating largely from two sources, sewage effluent and agricultural runoff. These compounds often occur as mixtures leading to potential combined effects. In order to investigate the effects of a realistic pharmaceutical mixture on an ecosystem, a study utilizing 15 of 12,000 L aquatic microcosms treated with eight common pharmaceuticals (atorvastatin, acetaminophen, caffeine, sulfamethoxazole, carbamazepine, levofloxacin, sertraline, and trimethoprim) at total (summed) molar concentrations of 0, 0.044, 0.608, 2.664, and 24.538 micromol/L (n = 3) was conducted. Phytotoxicity was assessed on a variety of somatic and pigment endpoints in rooted (Myriophyllum sibiricum) and floating (Lemna gibba) macrophytes over a 35-day period. EC10, EC25 and EC50 values were calculated for each endpoint exhibiting a concentration-dependent response. Generally, M. sibiricum and L. gibba displayed similar sensitivity to the pharmaceutical mixture, with phytotoxic injury evident in both species, which was concentration dependent. Through single compound 7-day daily static renewal toxicity tests with L. gibba, the sulfonamide antibiotic sulfamethoxazole, the fluoroquinolone antibiotic levofloxacin and the blood lipid regulator atorvastatin were found to be the only compounds to elicit phytotoxic effects in the concentration range utilized (0-1000 microg/L). Atorvastatin concentration was highly correlated to decreased pigment content in L. gibba, likely inhibiting the known target enzyme HMGR, the rate-limiting enzyme in isoprenoid biosynthesis. Hazard quotients were calculated for both microcosm and laboratory studies; the highest HQ values were 0.235 (L. gibba) and 0.051 (L. gibba), which are below the threshold value of 1 for chronic risks. The microcosm data suggest that at an ecological effect size of >20%, biologically significant risks are low for L. gibba and M. sibiricum exposed to similar mixtures of pharmaceutical compounds. For M. sibiricum and L. gibba, respective minimum differences of 5 and 1%, were detectable, however, these effect sizes are not considered ecologically significant.

Acute tubular necrosis associated with propylene glycol from concomitant administration of intravenous lorazepam and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

A 46-year-old morbidly obese man was admitted to the medical intensive care unit with respiratory failure. He required pressure-control ventilation and high levels of sedation with continuous-infusion lorazepam. He developed Stenotrophomonas maltophilia pneumonia; treatment included scheduled intravenous trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Each of these drugs contain several hundred milligrams/milliliter of propylene glycol. On day 17 of his hospital course, 3 days after starting the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, the patient developed acute renal failure consistent with acute tubular necrosis. Propylene glycol toxicity was suspected; therefore, all drugs containing propylene glycol were discontinued, and laboratory data were collected. A marked osmol gap, metabolic acidosis, and renal toxicity were attributed to both continuous and large intermittent doses of intravenous propylene glycol. Particular attention should be paid to the total amount of propylene glycol provided to patients from administered drugs. Patients in the intensive care setting who require high doses of intravenous lorazepam for sedation, as well as antimicrobial therapy with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for treatment of either Stenotrophomonas maltophilia or Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, may be at increased risk for propylene glycol toxicity and should be monitored closely.

Gotas óticas y su ototoxicidad / Otic drops and their ototoxicity

A pesar del frecuente uso de medicamentos óticos tópicos en el tratamiento de otitis media crónica activa, otorreas en presencia de tubos de ventilación o profilaxis tras la colocación de tubos, la controversia respecto al potencial rol ototóxico de estos agentes tópicos está lejos de resolverse. Si bien en animales se ha demostrado ototoxicidad coclear para la mayoría de los medicamentos, en humanos esto no parece se frecuente. En la presente revisión, referiré brevemente a la estructura de la membrana de la ventana redonda (MVR) y a los factores que influyen en su permeabilidad. Posteriormente, se comentarán los agentes tópicos más frecuentemente utilizados y su potencial ototoxicidad basado en estudios realizados tanto en animales como en humanos

Assessment of vestibular ototoxicity of ear drops by recording of vestibular evoked potentials to acceleration impulses.

INTRODUCTION: The cochlear ototoxicity of several ear drops is well documented in the literature, but very few studies exist on the vestibular ototoxicity of these topical drugs. GOAL OF STUDY: To develop an animal model for the assessment of the vestibular ototoxicity of ear drops. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two animal groups, consisting of five fat sand rats (FSRs) each, underwent unilateral labyrinthectomy. Normal saline was topically applied into the middle ear cavity of rats in the first group for 7 days (control group). Rats in the second group were treated in the same way by topical gentamicin solution. Cochlear function was assessed by the recording of auditory evoked potential (ABPs) thresholds, and vestibular function was assessed by the recording of vestibular evoked potentials (VsEPs) to angular accelerations. RESULTS: In the control group, except for the amplitude of the first wave, there was no significant difference in the VsEPs recorded before and after topical application. In the gentamicin group, VsEPs could not be recorded after 7 days, and ABPs were recorded in one case only, with a threshold of 100 dB sound pressure level (SPL). CONCLUSION: VsEPs seem to be a reliable measure for evaluating the vestibular ototoxicity of topical ear drops.