Perinatal outcomes and growth discordance of triplet pregnancies based on chorionicity: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The worldwide occurrence of triplet pregnancy is estimated to be 0.093%, with a natural incidence of approximately 1 in 8000. This study aims to analyze the neonatal health status and birth weight discordance (BWD) of triplets based on chorionicity from birth until discharge. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. We reviewed a total of 136 triplet pregnancies at our tertiary hospital between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2021. Maternal and neonatal outcomes, inter-triplet BWD, neonatal morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: Among all cases, the rates of intrauterine death, neonatal death, and perinatal death were 10.29, 13.07, and 24.26%, respectively. Thirty-seven of the cases resulted in fetal loss, including 13 with fetal anomalies. The maternal complications and neonatal outcomes of the 99 triplet pregnancies without fetal loss were compared across different chorionicities, including a dichorionic (DC) group (41 cases), trichorionic (TC) group (37 cases), and monochorionic (MC) group (21 cases). Neonatal hypoproteinemia (P < 0.001), hyperbilirubinemia (P < 0.019), and anemia (P < 0.003) exhibited significant differences according to chorionicity, as did the distribution of BWD (P < 0.001). More than half of the cases in the DC and TC groups had a BWD < 15%, while those in the MC group had a BWD < 50% (47.6%). TC pregnancy decreased the risk of neonatal anemia (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.084) and need for blood transfusion therapy after birth (AOR = 0.119). In contrast, a BWD > 25% increased the risk of neonatal anemia (AOR = 10.135) and need for blood transfusion after birth (AOR = 7.127). TC pregnancy, MCDA or MCTA, and BWD > 25% increased neonatal hypoproteinemia, with AORs of 4.629, 5.123, and 5.343, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The BWD differed significantly according to chorionicity. Additionally, TC pregnancies reduced the risk of neonatal anemia and need for blood transfusion, but increased the risk of neonatal hypoproteinemia. In contrast, the BWD between the largest and smallest triplets increased the risk of neonatal anemia and the need for blood transfusion. TC pregnancy, MCDA or MCTA, and BWD > 25% increased the risks of neonatal hypoproteinemia. However, due to the limited number of triplet pregnancies, further exploration of the underlying mechanism is warranted.

Monochorionic-triamniotic triplet pregnancy following artificial reproductive technology: Report of a rare case in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVE: Monochorionic-triamniotic (MCTA) triplet pregnancies following artificial reproductive technologies are uncommon. We report a case in which one of two transferred embryos differentiated into an MCTA triplet. This study aimed to investigate the potential factors contributing to MCTA triplet pregnancy. CASE REPORT: A 39-year-old woman underwent her second frozen embryo transfer with hatching blastocysts, which resulted in the detection of an MCTA triplet on ultrasonography. She delivered by cesarean section at 32 weeks of gestation, resulting in the birth of three live male infants. Her medical history and in vitro fertilization treatment were reviewed to identify potential causes. CONCLUSION: The etiology of MCTA triplet pregnancy remains multifactorial. In the presented case, prolonged in vitro culture to the blastocyst stage and inner cell mass splitting were potential contributing factors. Further research is needed to fully understand the complexity of MCTA triplet pregnancy.

First intrauterine transfusion in Rh isoimmunised triplet pregnancy.

G3P2L1, 28+4 weeks of gestation rhesus (Rh) isoimmunised pregnant women, was referred with trichorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancy with Rh antibody titres of 1:32. Nuchal translucency and anomaly scan were within normal limits with no major malformation for any of the fetuses. Obstetric colour Doppler with middle cerebral artery peak systolic volume revealed foetal anaemia in all three fetuses having velocities corresponding to around 1.5 times the median. Decision of intrauterine transfusion of blood to all three fetuses was taken. Access to fetuses was challenging and expertise in interventional ultrasound was required for transfusion. The patient tolerated the procedure well and eventually went on to deliver uneventfully at 34 weeks of gestation for worsening pre-eclampsia. After birth, all three triplets received triple-surface intensive phototherapy and intravenous immunoglobulin at a dosage of 1 g/kg. Phototherapy was gradually reduced and discontinued within 72 hours, and the infants were discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit at 96 hours of age.

Performance of cell-free DNA testing for common fetal trisomies in triplet pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: In singleton pregnancies, the use of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis as a screening test for common fetal trisomies has spread worldwide though we still lack sufficient data for its use in triplet pregnancies. The objective of this study is to assess the performance of cfDNA testing in detecting fetal aneuploidies in triplet pregnancies as a first-tier test. METHOD: We performed a retrospective cohort study including data from pregnant women with a triplet pregnancy who underwent cfDNA testing between May 1, 2017, and January 15, 2020. cfDNA was obtained by massive parallel sequencing (VeriSeq NIPT solution; Illumina®). The objectives of the study were to assess the diagnostic performance of cfDNA testing for trisomy 21 (T21) (primary outcome), trisomy 18 (T18) and 13 (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: During the study period, cfDNA testing was performed in 255 women with triplet pregnancy, of which 165 (64.7%) had a neonatal outcome available. Three tests were positive for T21, one of which was confirmed by an antenatal karyotype, and the other was confirmed at birth. The third case did not undergo an invasive procedure and was not confirmed at birth (false positive). In one case, cfDNA testing was positive for T18 and was confirmed by an antenatal karyotype. There were no cases of trisomy 13 in the cohort. The no-call rate was 2.4% at first sampling. Fifty-eight (22.7%) women had embryo reduction, which in 40 (69%) of whom was performed after the cfDNA test result. CONCLUSION: cfDNA testing could be offered as primary screening for main fetal aneuploidies in triplet pregnancies after provision of appropriate patient information.

Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes of dichorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancies with selective foetal reduction after assisted reproductive technology.

BACKGROUND: It is generally beneficial and recommended that dichorionic triamniotic (DCTA) triplet pregnancies be reduced to monochorionic (MC) twin or singleton pregnancies after assisted reproductive technology (ART). However, some infertile couples still have a firm desire to retain twins. For this reason, the best foetal reduction strategies need to be available for infertile couples and clinicians. Given that data on the elective reduction of DCTA triplet pregnancies to twin pregnancies are scarce, we investigated the outcomes of elective reduction of DCTA triplet pregnancies through the retrospective analysis of previous data. METHOD: Patients with DCTA triplet pregnancies who underwent elective foetal reduction between January 2012 and June 2020 were recruited. A total of 67 eligible patients with DCTA triplet pregnancies were divided into two groups: a DCTA-to-dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) twin group (n = 38) and a DCTA-to-monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin group (n = 29); the basic clinical data of the two groups were collected for comparison. RESULTS: Compared with the DCDA-to-MCDA twin group, the DCTA-to-DCDA twin group had lower rates of complete miscarriage (7.89% versus 31.03%, p = 0.014), early complete miscarriage (5.26% versus 24.14%, p = 0.034), late preterm birth (25.71% versus 65.00%, p = 0.009) and very low birth weight (0 versus 11.11%, p = 0.025). In addition, the DCTA-to-DCDA twin group had higher rates of full-term delivery (65.71% versus 25.00%, p = 0.005), survival (92.11% versus 68.97%, p = 0.023), and taking the babies home (92.11% versus 68.97%, p = 0.023) than did the DCTA-to-MCDA twin group. In terms of neonatal outcomes, a significantly greater gestational age (38.06 ± 2.39 versus 36.28 ± 2.30, p = 0.009), average birth weight (3020.77 ± 497.33 versus 2401.39 ± 570.48, p < 0.001), weight of twins (2746.47 ± 339.64 versus 2251.56 ± 391.26, p < 0.001), weight of the larger neonate (2832.94 ± 320.58 versus 2376.25 ± 349.95, p < 0.001) and weight of the smaller neonate (2660.00 ± 345.34 versus 2126.88 ± 400.93, p < 0.001) was observed in the DCTA-to-DCDA twin group compared to the DCTA-to-MCDA twin group. CONCLUSION: The DCTA-to-DCDA twin group had better pregnancy and neonatal outcomes than the DCTA-to-MCDA twin group. This reduction approach may be beneficial for patients with dichorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancies who have a strong desire to have DCDA twins.

The effect of chorionicity on maternal and neonatal outcomes in triplet pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: Triplet gestations are associated with increased maternal, fetal, and neonatal complications particularly early and extreme preterm delivery. Identifying and interrupting the preterm delivery cascade could prevent the fetal, neonatal, and long-term childhood complications. The shared circulation and placental vascular anastomosis are responsible for the occurrence of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, selective fetal growth restriction as well as the higher risk of morbidity and mortality observed in mono and dichorionic compared to trichorionic triplet gestations. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of chorionicity on maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes of triplet pregnancies as it has not been fully ascertained. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective population-based cohort study of 125 parturient with triplets' pregnancy who delivered at a single tertiary hospital. RESULTS: 98 trichorionic and 27 dichorionic gestations were included. Maternal demographic and obstetric characteristics as well as pregnancy and postpartum complications were similar in the two study groups. The median gestational age at delivery was lower among dichorionic than trichorionic triplet gestations (median 31 vs 33 weeks, p < 0.046). Early (<32 weeks) and extreme preterm delivery (<28 weeks) were more prevalent in the dichorionic than the trichorionic group (early - 56 % vs 34 %, p < 0.038; extreme - 33.3 % vs 8 %, p < 0.002). We found no difference in fetal or newborns' complications and characteristics between the groups. However, the rate of neonatal death was significantly higher in the dichorionic compared to trichorionic triplet gestations (22 % vs 7 %, p < 0.038). A multivariate logistic regression model to determine the variables that contribute to early preterm delivery in triplet gestations showed that women who experienced a past preterm delivery had an independently higher risk for early preterm delivery in the triplet gestation (adj. OR 5.91, 95 % CI 1.16-30.03). Neither maternal age nor chorionicity were found to be independent risk factors for early preterm delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Dichorionic triplet gestations exhibit a higher rate of early (<32 weeks) and extreme (<28 weeks) preterm delivery and are more prone to neonatal death compared to trichorionic gestations. Past preterm delivery is an independent risk factor for early preterm delivery in a triplet gestation.

Utility of cervical pessary in the prevention of preterm birth in triplet pregnancies: A single-center observational retrospective study of 165 triplet pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: Premature births are a health problem arising in triplet pregnancies, resulting in high levels of morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study is to evaluate the utility of cervical pessaries in reducing prematurity (<34 weeks) in triplet pregnancies. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective case-control study regarding triplet pregnancies with follow-up at the La Paz University Hospital between 2000 and 2023. Maternal characteristics, obstetric and perinatal outcomes, and the use of cervical pessaries were examined. RESULTS: 165 triplet pregnancies were analyzed: 87 (52.7 %) in the case group (premature triplet pregnancies) and 78 in the control group (non-premature triplet pregnancies). A cervical pessary was inserted in 15 (17.2 %) triplet pregnancies in the case group and in 12 (16.7 %) triplet pregnancies in the control group (p = 0.92; OR = 1.04 (0.46-2.35)). A pessary was later inserted in the non-premature group (p = 0.01). The risk of preterm labor and the use of tocolytics ± glucocorticoids were found to be significantly more frequent in the premature group, with p = 0.01; OR = 2.30 (1.21-4.36) and p < 0.01; OR = 2.36 (1.23-4.44), respectively. Protocol-based cesarean sections were more frequent in the non-premature group (p < 0.01), while cesarean sections due to maternal complications (p < 0.01) and premature membrane rupture (p < 0.01) were more frequent in the premature group. CONCLUSION: The cervical pessary is not useful in preventing preterm births (< 34 weeks) in triplet pregnancies. It is likely that being pregnant with triplets is a powerful independent factor associated with prematurity, despite other pregnancy conditions. Women who are pregnant with triplets and at risk of preterm labor and those taking tocolytics ± glucocorticoids may benefit from pessary insertion.

The outcome of reduced and non-reduced triplet pregnancies managed in a tertiary hospital during a 15-year-period - a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Triplet pregnancies involve several complications, the most important being prematurity as virtually all triplets are born preterm. We conducted this study to compare the outcomes of reduced vs. non-reduced triplet pregnancies managed in the largest tertiary hospital in Finland. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study in the Helsinki University Hospital during 2006-2020. Data on the pregnancies, parturients and newborns were collected from patient records. The fetal number, chorionicity and amnionicity were defined in first-trimester ultrasound screening. The main outcome measures were perinatal and neonatal mortality of non-reduced triplets, compared to twins and singletons selectively reduced of triplet pregnancies. RESULTS: There were 57 initially triplet pregnancies and 35 of these continued as non-reduced triplets and resulted in the delivery of 104 liveborn children. The remaining 22 cases were spontaneously or medically reduced to twins (9) or singletons (13). Most (54.4 %) triplet pregnancies were spontaneous. There were no significant differences in gestational age at delivery between triplets (mean 33+0, median 34+0) and those reduced to twins (mean 32+5, median 36+0). The survival at one week of age was higher for triplets compared to twins (p<0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Most pregnancies continued as non-reduced triplets, which were born at a similar gestational age but with a significantly higher liveborn rate compared to those reduced to twins. There were no early neonatal deaths among cases reduced to singletons. Prematurity was the greatest concern for multiples in this cohort, whereas the small numbers may explain the lack of difference in gestational age between these groups.

Monochorionic triplet pregnancy complicated by conjoined twins and early twin-twin transfusion syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The condition of monozygotic, monochorionic triplet fetuses with a pair of conjoined twins is extremely rare (close to one in a million births), presents challenges in its management, and with poor prognosis. CASE REPORT: We report a case of monochorionic diamniotic triplet pregnancy, ultrasound at 14 weeks shows a pair of conjoined thoracopagus fetuses, sharing heart, liver, and umbilical cord, in addition to omphalocele. The third fetus, without malformations, presents signs of early heart failure compatible with twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. It was decided to carry out expectant management where at 18 weeks, intrauterine death of the three fetuses occurs. An abortion is performed by hysterotomy. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment in these cases is discussed, three management options have been proposed: expectant management, selective reduction of the conjoined fetuses, or termination of the pregnancy. A review of the literature found only 12 cases with this combination of pathologies, in which only 3 normal fetuses (25%) survived and none of the conjoined twins survived. To our knowledge, this case is the first of a monochorionic triplet pregnancy with conjoined fetuses complicated with early twin-to-twin transfusion.

Comparison of maternal, fetal, obstetric and neonatal outcomes for 234 triplet pregnancies conceived in vivo versus IVF and ICSI conceptions.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is there a difference in maternal, fetal, obstetric and neonatal outcomes for triplet pregnancies when comparing in vivo conceptions with those conceived by assisted reproductive technology (ART)? DESIGN: This single-centre, retrospective cohort study included all triplet pregnancies followed up at La Paz University Hospital, Madrid between 2000 and 2022. The characteristics of the pregnant women, and maternal, fetal, obstetric and perinatal outcomes were examined. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: In total, 234 triplet pregnancies were analysed: 92 in the natural and assisted insemination conception group (in-vivo conception) and 142 in the in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection conception group (ART conception). ART triplet pregnancies were more common between 2000 and 2010 (P = 0.003). The percentage of monochorionic triamniotic pregnancies was significantly higher (P = 0.02) in the in-vivo conception group, and the percentage of dichorionic triamniotic pregnancies was significantly higher (P = 0.003) in the ART conception group. After adjusting for confounders, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) remained significantly more common in the ART conception group (adjusted odds ratio 8.65, 95% CI 1.66-45.03; P = 0.01). Differences in maternal age (P = 0.61), threatened preterm labour (P = 0.10), Apgar score ≤5 at 5 min (P = 0.99), umbilical cord pH <7.20 (P = 0.99) and fetal death (P = 0.99) disappeared after adjustment for confounders. CONCLUSION: ART triplet pregnancies had a higher rate of IUGR than in vivo triplet pregnancies. This could be related to higher maternal age, and higher rates of Apgar score ≤5 at 5 min and umbilical cord pH <7.20 in these pregnancies. In these cases, placental examination could provide valuable information.

Considering multifetal pregnancy reduction in triplet pregnancies: do we forget the emotional impact on fathers? A qualitative study from The Netherlands.

STUDY QUESTION: What factors influence the decision-making process of fathers regarding multifetal pregnancy reduction or maintaining a triplet pregnancy, and how do these decisions impact their psychological well-being? SUMMARY ANSWER: For fathers, the emotional impact of multifetal pregnancy reduction or caring for triplets is extensive and requires careful consideration. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Multifetal pregnancy reduction is a medical procedure with the purpose to reduce the number of fetuses to improve chances of a healthy outcome for both the remaining fetus(es) and the mother, either for medical reasons or social considerations. Aspects of the decision whether to perform multifetal pregnancy reduction have been rarely investigated, and the impact on fathers is unknown. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Qualitative study with semi-structured interviews between October 2021 and February 2023. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Fathers either after multifetal pregnancy reduction from triplet to twin or singleton pregnancy or ongoing triplet pregnancies 1-6 years after the decision were included. The interview schedule was designed to explore key aspects related to (i) the decision-making process whether to perform multifetal pregnancy reduction and (ii) the emotional aspects and psychological impact of the decision. Thematic analysis was used to identify patterns and trends in the father's data. The process involved familiarization with the data, defining and naming themes, and producing a final report. This study was a collaboration between a regional secondary hospital (OLVG) and a tertiary care hospital (Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC), both situated in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Data saturation was achieved after 12 interviews. Five main themes were identified: (i) initial responses and emotional complexity, (ii) experiencing disparities in counselling quality and post-decision care, (iii) personal influences on the decision journey, (iv) navigating parenthood: choices, challenges, and emotional adaptation, and (v) shared wisdom and lessons. For fathers, the decision whether to maintain or reduce a triplet pregnancy is complex, in which medical, psychological but mainly social factors play an important role. In terms of psychological consequences after the decision, this study found that fathers after multifetal pregnancy reduction often struggled with difficult emotions towards the decision; some expressed feelings of doubt or regret and were still processing these emotions. Several fathers after an ongoing triplet had experienced a period of severe stress in the first years after the pregnancy, with major consequences for their mental health. Help in emotional processing was not offered to any of the fathers after the decision or birth. LIMITATION, REASONS FOR CAUTION: While our study focuses on the multifetal pregnancy reduction process in the Amsterdam region, we recognize the importance of further investigation into how this process may vary across different regions in The Netherlands and internationally. We acknowledge the potential of selection bias, as fathers with more positive experiences might have been more willing to participate. Caution is needed in interpreting the role of the mother in the recruitment process. Additionally, the time span of 1-6 years between the decision and the interviews may have influenced emotional processing and introduced potential reporting bias. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The emotional impact of multifetal pregnancy reduction or caring for triplets is significant, emphasizing the need for awareness among caregivers regarding the emotional challenges faced by fathers. A guided trajectory might optimize the decision-making and primarily facilitate the provision of appropriate care thereafter to optimize outcomes around decisions with potential traumatic implications. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study received no funding. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

First case of dichorionic diamniotic triplet pregnancy after single blastocyst transfer.

Multiple pregnancies are associated with significant maternal, fetal, and neonatal risks, including prematurity, low birth weight, pre-eclampsia, anemia, postpartum hemorrhage, intrauterine growth restriction, neonatal morbidity, and increased neonatal and infant mortality rates. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments should prioritize efforts to reduce such events, resisting patient demand for the transfer of multiple embryos at each transfer to increase success rates. Extended culture, embryo selection, and single blastocyst transfer can mitigate the risk of high-order multiple pregnancies. Intriguingly, elective single-embryo transfer (eSET) greatly reduces, but does not completely eliminate, the likelihood of multiple gestations. The occurrence of monozygotic twinning (MZT) gives rise to identical twins. It is more prevalent in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) compared with natural conception. In fact, the reported risks of monozygotic twinning in IVF and natural conception are 1.7 and 0.4%, respectively. The factors suspected to increase the risk of MZT in IVF are multiple embryo transfer, micromanipulation, and extended in vitro culture. Determining chorionicity and amnionicity is crucial in the assessment of multiple pregnancies during the first-trimester ultrasound examination. Dichorionic twins result from embryo splitting within 3 days after fertilization, while monochorionic twins occur when the splitting takes place between 4 and 8 days after fertilization. These timings are suggested by observations carried out in natural pregnancies. In ART, there is evidence of dichorionic twins derived from single embryo transfer (SET). Here, we report a case of dichorionic diamniotic triplets after a single blastocyst transfer occurred in our center. To our knowledge, this is the first case documented so far.

Clinical outcomes of fetal selective reduction in dichorionic triplet pregnancies.

BACKGROUND: It is recommended to reduce triplet pregnancy containing monochorionic (MC) twins to singleton. Given that some couples with infertility are eager to retain twins, better strategy is needed to avoid obstetrical risks and satisfy their strong wish. This retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the outcomes of triplet pregnancy reduction. METHODS: Subjects with triplet pregnancies who underwent selective reduction between 2016 and 2019 at our hospital were enrolled. A total of 66 subjects with dichorionic triplet (DCT) with MC twins and an MC singleton were divided into two groups: group A (N = 38), reduced to dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) twins; group B (N = 28), reduced to MC diamniotic (MCDA) twins. Obstetrical and perinatal outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: Group A had significantly lower rates of early miscarriage (0% vs 14.3%, p = 0.028), cesarean section (81.6% vs 100%, p = 0.041), and late premature delivery (21.1% vs 45.4%, p = 0.047) than group B. Significantly higher rates of full-term delivery (71% vs 36.4%, p = 0.009) and take-home baby (100% vs 78.6%, p = 0.004), and higher gestational age at delivery (median: 38 [36.9, 39.0] vs 35.8 [34.4, 37.0] weeks, p < 0.001), total neonatal weight (2899.7 ± 647.6 vs 2354.4 ± 651.8 g, p < 0.001), weight of twins (2550 vs 2350 g, p = 0.039), and weight of larger neonate in twins (2790 vs 2500 g, p = 0.045) were observed in group A compared to group B. CONCLUSION: DCT reduced to DCDA twins confers better pregnancy outcomes than into MCDA twins. This might benefit for triplet pregnancy subjects who strongly want to retain fraternal twins.

Birth outcomes of twins after multifetal pregnancy reduction compared with primary twins.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of assisted reproductive technology and the trend of increasing maternal age at conception have contributed to a significant rise in the incidence of multiple pregnancies. Multiple pregnancies bear several inherent risks for both mother and child. These risks increase with plurality and type of chorionicity. Multifetal pregnancy reduction is the selective abortion of ≥1 fetuses to improve the outcome of the remaining fetus(es) by decreasing the risk of premature birth and other complications. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare birth outcomes of trichorionic triplets reduced to twins with those of trichorionic triplets and primary dichorionic twins. The added value of this study is the comparison with an additional control group, namely primary dichorionic twins. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. Data from January 1990 to November 2016 were collected from the East Flanders Prospective Twin Survey, one of the largest European multiple birth registries. A total of 85 trichorionic triplet pregnancies (170 neonates) undergoing multifetal pregnancy reduction to twins were compared with 5093 primary dichorionic twin pregnancies (10,186 neonates) and 104 expectantly managed trichorionic triplet pregnancies (309 neonates). The assessed outcomes were gestational age at delivery, birthweight, and small for gestational age. RESULTS: Pregnancy reduction from triplets to twins was associated with higher birthweight (+365.44 g; 95% confidence interval, 222.75-508.14 g; P<.0001) and higher gestational age (1.7 weeks; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-2.46; P<.0001) compared with ongoing trichorionic triplets after adjustment for sex, parity, method of conception, birth year, and maternal age. A trend toward lower risk of small for gestational age was observed. Reduced triplets had, on average, lower birthweight (-263.12 g; 95% confidence interval, -371.80 to -154.44 g; P<.0001) and lower gestational age (-1.13 weeks; 95% confidence interval, -1.70 to -0.56; P=.0001) compared with primary twins. No statistically significant difference was observed between primary twins and reduced triplets that reached 32 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSION: Multifetal pregnancy reduction from trichorionic triplets to twins significantly improved birth outcomes. This suggests that multifetal pregnancy reduction of trichorionic triplets to twins is medically justifiable. However, the birth outcomes of primary twins before 32 weeks of gestation are still better than those of reduced triplets. The process of multifetal pregnancy reduction includes at least 1 fetal death by definition, and thus prevention of higher-order pregnancies is preferable.

New radiofrequency ablation procedure for selective reduction in complicated monochorionic twin or triplet pregnancy using multistep, incremental expansion technique.

OBJECTIVE: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the preferred approach for selective reduction in complex monochorionic (MC) multiple pregnancies owing to the ease of operation and minimal invasiveness. To optimize the RFA technique and reduce the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome resulting from the heat-sink effect of RFA therapy, we used an innovative RFA method, in which an electrode needle was expanded incrementally and stepwise. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety profile of this novel multistep incremental expansion RFA method for selective fetal reduction in MC twin and triplet pregnancies. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of all MC multiple pregnancies undergoing RFA between March 2016 and October 2022 at our center. The multistep RFA technique involved the use of an expandable needle, which was gradually expanded during the RFA procedure until cessation of umbilical cord blood flow was achieved. The needle used for the single-step RFA method was fully extended from the start of treatment. RESULTS: In total, 132 MC multiple pregnancies underwent selective reduction using RFA, including 50 cases undergoing multistep RFA and 82 cases undergoing single-step RFA. The overall survival rates were not significantly different between the multistep and single-step RFA groups (81.1% vs 72.3%; P = 0.234). Similarly, the rates of preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes within 2 weeks after RFA, procedure-related complications, spontaneous preterm delivery and pathological findings on cranial ultrasound, as well as gestational age at delivery and birth weight, did not differ between the two groups. However, there was a trend towards a prolonged procedure-to-delivery interval following multistep RFA compared with single-step RFA (median, 109 vs 99 days; P = 0.377). Moreover, the fetal loss rate within 2 weeks after RFA in the multistep RFA group was significantly lower than that in the single-step RFA group (10.0% vs 24.4%; P = 0.041). The median ablation time was shorter (5.3 vs 7.8 min; P < 0.001) and the median ablation energy was lower (10.2 vs 18.0 kJ; P < 0.001) in multistep compared with single-step RFA. There were no significant differences in neonatal outcomes following multistep vs single-step RFA. CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival rates were similar between the two RFA methods. However, the multistep RFA technique was associated with a lower risk of fetal loss within 2 weeks after RFA. The multistep RFA technique required significantly less ablation energy and a shorter ablation time compared with single-step RFA in selective fetal reduction of MC twin and triplet pregnancies. Additionally, there was a trend towards a prolonged procedure-to-delivery interval with the multistep RFA technique. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

General Principles for Counseling and Management of Triplet Pregnancies.

Compared with singleton pregnancies, triplet pregnancies are associated with a significantly increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Early ultrasound examination is the best way to diagnose triplets, establish dating, and determine the number of placentas to provide appropriate counseling and monitoring. Dichorionic placentation adds risks specifically associated with a shared placenta, and limits options for intervention. Multifetal reduction is an option that can significantly improve pregnancy outcomes compared with non-reduced triplet pregnancies. Integration of a Maternal-Fetal Medicine specialist in the prenatal care for a triplet pregnancy reduces the risk of preeclampsia, preterm birth, low birthweight infants, perinatal mortality, and major neonatal morbidity.

Intertwin nuchal translucency difference predicts the chance of co-twin death after fetal reduction in dichorionic triplet pregnancies: a retrospective analysis study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical outcomes of different multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) programs in dichorionic (DC) triplets, and explore the association between early ultrasound characteristics and co-twin death after potassium chloride (KCl) injection into one monochorionic (MC) twin. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of DC triplets who underwent MFPR at our center during 2012-2021. Patients were grouped as follows: intracardiac KCl injection into one MC twin (group A), intracardiac KCl injection into both MC twins simultaneously (group B), and reduction of the singleton fetus (group C) and pregnancy outcomes were compared. Logistic regression was used to determine whether ultrasound measurements at 11-13+6 weeks predicted co-twin death and the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to assess the predictive performance. RESULTS: Finally, we enrolled 184 patients. 153 cases were in group A, and 18, 13 cases were in group B and C respectively. Gestational age at the time of MFPR did not differ among the 3 groups (median: [Formula: see text] weeks). The survival rate was 89.6%, 88.9%, and 92.3% in group A, B, and C respectively, which was comparable among groups. Preterm birth was more common in group C (10/12, 83.3%). After KCl injection into one MC twin, co-twin death occurred in 86.3% cases (132/153) within 1 day; however, 3 patients had 2 live births each, with normal postnatal development. Intertwin nuchal translucency (NT) difference/discordance significantly predicted co-twin death within 1 day after MFPR, and the areas under the ROC curve were 0.694 and 0.689, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For MFPR in DC triplet pregnancies, reduction of the MC twins results in less preterm birth, and women with KCl injection into either one or both MC twins had similar outcomes. Large intertwin NT difference/discordance was associated with co-twin death within 1 day after KCl injection into one of the MC twins.

Successful delayed interval delivery of a triplet pregnancy using conservative management.

Preterm birth is a significant cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality, especially in multiple pregnancies. Delayed interval delivery can prolong pregnancy for the remaining fetus(es) in an imminent stillbirth or extremely preterm birth of the first fetus, improving the lastborn's outcomes. We present a case of delayed interval delivery of a triplet pregnancy following preterm prelabour rupture of membranes and progressive cervical insufficiency. Following vaginal delivery of the first fetus at 24+1 gestational weeks, the patient received antibiotics and tocolysis. Cerclage was not conducted as the mother had a vaginal infection. A 15-day delivery interval for the second and third fetuses was achieved. The firstborn required mechanical ventilation and inotropic support, while the others only required continuous positive airway pressure. There is no consensus on the best way to perform delayed interval delivery. We achieved a complications-free interval of 15 days with conservative management in a triplet pregnancy.

Maternal, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in triplet pregnancies in Sweden - a nationwide cohort study.

Background: Triplet pregnancies carry a high risk of pregnancy-related complications. The primary aim of this study was to describe maternal, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes in expectantly managed triplet pregnancies in Sweden. The secondary aim was to compare outcomes in expectantly managed triplet pregnancies with triplet pregnancies where fetal reduction had been performed with the only indication to reduce the number of fetuses. Methods: Nationwide cohort study based on linkage of data from three national Swedish registers. Triplet pregnancies with delivery at gestational age ≥ 22+0 weeks between 2014 and 2019 were included. Results: In the main cohort of expectantly managed triplet pregnancies (n = 106), 98% (312/318) of infants were liveborn with a mean gestational age at birth of 32+3 weeks and a mean birthweight of 1,726 g. Nine percent (n = 29) suffered from severe neonatal morbidity, and 4% (n = 12) died during the neonatal period. In the reduced cohort (n = 13 pregnancies), all infants were liveborn (n = 22). Mean gestational age at birth (36+0 weeks) and mean birthweight (2,444 g) were higher than in the expectantly managed cohort (P < 0.01 for both comparisons). There were no cases of severe neonatal morbidity (P = 0.24) or mortality (P = 1.00). Conclusion: Overall neonatal survival from 22+0 weeks of gestation in expectantly managed triplet pregnancies in Sweden was high. Nine out of 10 infants did not suffer from severe neonatal morbidity. Fetal reduction was performed in only a very small number of cases and was associated with higher gestational age at birth and higher birth weight.

[Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes After Fetal Reduction in Monochorionic, Dichorionic, and Trichorionic Triplet Pregnancies].

Objective: To compare the pregnancy outcomes of pregnancy outcomes after selective fetal reduction treatment in monochorionic, dichorionic, and trichorionic triplet pregnancies. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 118 pregnant women carrying triplets. All subjects underwent regular prenatal check-ups and were admitted for delivery at West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University between January 1, 2012 and January 31, 2021. According to the chorionicity, the subjects were divided into a monochorionic group ( n=13), a dichorionic group ( n=44), and a trichorionic group ( n=61). Within each group, the subjects were further divided into two subgroups, a reduction group and an expectant treatment group, according to whether they underwent fetal reduction or not. The clinical data and pregnancy outcomes were compared between the subgroups within each group. Results: In the monichorionic group, the reduction subgroup had a lower preterm birth rate and higher neonatal birth body mass than those of the expectant management subgroup, but the differences were not statistically significant. In the dichorionic and trichorionic groups, the rates of preterm delivery, neonatal hospitalization, and serious complications of the reduction subgroups were lower than those of the expectant subgroups ( P<0.05), while the neonatal birth body mass was higher in the reduction subgroups than that in the expectant subgroups ( P<0.05). In the dichorionic group, the incidence of intrahepatic cholestasis during pregnancy was lower in the reduction subgroup than that in the expectant treatment subgroup. In all 3 groups, there was no statistically significant difference between the subgroups in the incidence of gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, premature rupture of membranes, and postpartum hemorrhage. The survival curve analysis showed that women receiving fetal reduction during the first trimester had a lower risk of pregnancy loss and more significant prolonged of gestational age than those undergoing the procedure during the second trimester. Conclusion: Fetal reduction of triplets can significantly prolong the gestational age and improve the perinatal prognosis. In addition, selective reduction in the first trimester may lead to greater benefits than selective reduction in the second trimester does.