Fluoride-assisted liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for simultaneous analysis of propofol and its metabolites without derivatization in urine.

The misuse of propofol for recreational purposes has become a serious social issue. Accordingly, practical and sensitive analytical methods to investigate the chronic abuse and toxicity of propofol are required. However, current propofol determination methods using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) suffer from problems associated with loss in sample preparation due to its volatility and its poor ionization efficiency and collision-induced dissociation in mass spectrometry. Herein, we have developed a sensitive and accurate fluoride-assisted LC-MS/MS method combined with direct-injection for propofol determination. Ionization via fluoride-ion attachment/induced deprotonation, effected by ammonium fluoride in the mobile phase, was found to dramatically improve the sensitivity of propofol without derivatization. Furthermore, direct injection without derivatization enables the simultaneous analysis of propofol and its phase II metabolites without analyte loss. The optimal concentration of ammonium fluoride in the mobile phase was found to be 1 mM under methanol conditions. The linearity is good (R2 ≥ 0.999) and the intra- and inter-day precisions for propofol determination are between 1.9 and 8.7%. The accuracies range from 87.5% to 105.4% and the limits of detection and quantitation for propofol in urine are 0.15 and 0.44 ng mL-1, respectively. The present method was successfully applied to human urine and showed a sufficient sensitivity to determine propofol and five phase II metabolites over 48 h in human urine after administration. Consequently, the fluoride-assisted LC-MS/MS method was demonstrated to be sensitive, accurate, and practical for the determination of propofol and its metabolites.

Orina verde después de una rectosigmoidoscopia / Green urine after a rectosigmoidoscopy

No disponible

Determination of Propofol by GC/MS and Fast GC/MS-TOF in Two Cases of Poisoning.

Two cases of suspected acute and lethal intoxication caused by propofol were delivered by the judicial authority to the Department of Sciences for Health Promotion and Mother-Child Care in Palermo, Sicily. In the first case a female nurse was found in a hotel room, where she lived with her mother; four 10 mg/mL vials and two 20 mg/mL vials of propofol were found near the decedent along with syringes and needles. In the second case a male nurse was found in the operating room of a hospital, along with a used syringe. In both cases a preliminary systematic and toxicological analysis indicated the presence of propofol in the blood and urine. As a result, a method for the quantitative determination of propofol in biological fluids was optimized and validated using a liquid-liquid extraction protocol followed by GC/MS and fast GC/MS-TOF. In the first case, the concentration of propofol in blood was determined to be 8.1 µg/mL while the concentration of propofol in the second case was calculated at 1.2 µg/mL. Additionally, the tissue distribution of propofol was determined for both cases. Brain and liver concentrations of propofol were, respectively, 31.1 and 52.2 µg/g in Case 1 and 4.7 and 49.1 µg/g in Case 2. Data emerging from the autopsy findings, histopathological exams as well as the toxicological results aided in establishing that the deaths were due to poisoning, however, the manner of death in each were different: homicide in Case 1 and suicide in Case 2.

Verification of propofol sulfate as a further human propofol metabolite using LC-ESI-QQQ-MS and LC-ESI-QTOF-MS analysis.

BACKGROUND: Propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol) is a water-insoluble, intravenous anesthetic that is widely used for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia as well as for endoscopic and pediatric sedation. After admission, propofol undergoes extensive hepatic and extrahepatic metabolism, including direct conjugation to propofol glucuronide and hydroxylation to 2,6-diisopropyl-1,4-quinol. The latter substance subsequently undergoes phase II metabolism, resulting in the formation of further metabolites (1quinolglucuronide, 4quinolglucuronide and 4quinol-sulfate). Further minor phase I propofol metabolites (2-(ω-propanol)-6-isopropylphenol and 2-(ω-propanol)-6-isopropyl-1,4-quinol)) are also described. Due to its chemical structure with the phenolic hydroxyl group, propofol is also an appropriate substrate for sulfation by sulfotransferases. METHODS: The existence of propofol sulfate was investigated by liquid chromatography electrospray ionization triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LCESIQQQ-MS) and liquid chromatography electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LCESI-QTOF-MS). A propofol sulfate reference standard was used for identification and method development, yielding a precursor at m/z 257 (deprotonated propofol sulfate) and product ions at m/z 177 (deprotonated propofol) and m/z 80 ([SO3]-). RESULTS: Propofol sulfate - a further phase II metabolite of propofol - was verified in urine samples by LC-ESI-QQQ-MS and LC-ESI-QTOF-MS. Analyses of urine samples from five volunteers collected before and after propofol-induced sedation verified the presence of propofol sulfate in urine following propofol administration, whereas ascertained concentrations of this metabolite were significantly lower compared with detected propofol glucuronide concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The existence of propofol sulfate as a further phase II propofol metabolite in humans could be verified by two different detection techniques (LCESIQQQ-MS and LC-ESI-QTOFMS) on the basis of a propofol sulfate reference standard. Evaluation of the quantitative analyses of propofol sulfate imply that propofol sulfate represents a minor metabolite of propofol and is only slightly involved in human propofol clearance.

An analysis of green discoloration of urine caused by propofol infusion.

BACKGROUND: Propofol is a short-acting, intravenous sedative-hypnotic agent that is widely used for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia and sedation. An uncommon adverse effect of propofol is green discoloration of the urine, which has been reported not only under general anesthesia but also with sedation. Although it is assumed that the phenolic derivatives of propofol can cause green discoloration of the urine, the actual origin remains unknown. The aim of this report was to identify the origin of the green discoloration of the urine using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). CLINICAL FEATURES: The patient, a 51-year-old man, was scheduled for his oral surgery under general anesthesia using propofol. Postoperatively, the color of his urine was observed to be green. We compared and analyzed both the green urine and the normal urine using LC-MS. CONCLUSION: We experienced a case of a patient with green discoloration of the urine after general anesthesia using propofol. Although LC-MS analysis showed 2 unique peaks in the green urine at 490 and 590 nm, obvious causes were not revealed.

Orina verde asociada a infusión de propofol / Green urine due to propofol infusion

No disponible

Grass-green urine from propofol infusion.

Green urine from propofol infusion is a benign and rare side effect. The discolouration appears when clearance of propofol exceeds hepatic elimination, and extrahepatic elimination of propofol occurs. This case report presents a 24-year-old male with grass green discolouration of urine based on propofol infusion.

Enhancing the sensitivity of the LC-MS/MS detection of propofol in urine and blood by azo-coupling derivatization.

Propofol is a low-polarity, volatile molecule that is difficult for an electrospray ion source (ESI) to ionize in either negative ion mode (NIM) or positive ion mode (PIM), which hampers its detection via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The aim of the present study was to use a new derivatization agent to improve ionization efficiency and to develop an efficient liquid chromatography-multiple mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) determination of propofol in urine and blood, taking advantage of an electrophilic aromatic substitution. An azo-coupling reaction with a diazonium salt from aniline was performed to introduce a protonation site into the molecule. The diazonium salt was generated by aniline in water solution by HCl and sodium nitrite; derivatization was achieved by stirring a mixture of the diazonium salt and propofol in sodium hydroxide solution for 30 min below 5 °C. A liquid-liquid extraction with dichloromethane and ethyl acetate was performed to obtain the azo derivative (molecular composition: C18H22ON2; molecular weight: 282 Da) in high yield. The compound provided very high ionization yields in both PIM and NIM ESI, and the protonated or deprotonated molecule gave intense signals. The transitions m/z 283 → 77, 241 and m/z 281 → 176, 161 were chosen for the PIM and NIM, respectively, in order to develop quantitative methods of detecting propofol in urine and blood via triple-quadrupole LC-MS/MS. These methods proved to be highly sensitive, with limits of quantification of 0.4 pg/mL and 0.1 ng/mL obtained in the NIM when analyzing 1 mL of urine and 100 µL of blood, respectively.

Effects of hypothermia on the disposition of morphine, midazolam, fentanyl, and propofol in intensive care unit patients.

Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) may induce pharmacokinetic changes that may affect the level of sedation. We have compared the disposition of morphine, midazolam, fentanyl, and propofol in TH with normothermia in man. Fourteen patients treated with TH following cardiac arrest (33-34°C) were compared with eight matched critically ill patients (36-38°C). Continuous infusions of morphine and midazolam were stopped and replaced with infusions of fentanyl and propofol to describe elimination and start of infusion pharmacokinetics, respectively. Serial serum and urine samples were collected for 6-8 hours for validated quantification and subsequent pharmacokinetic analysis. During TH, morphine elimination half-life (t(1/2)) was significantly higher, while total clearance (CL(tot)) was significantly lower (median [semi-interquartile range (s-iqr)]): t(1/2), 266 (43) versus 168 (11) minutes, P < 0.01; CL(tot), 1201 (283) versus 1687 (200) ml/min, P < 0.01. No significant differences were seen for midazolam. CL(tot) of fentanyl and propofol was significantly lower in hypothermic patients [median (s-iqr)]: fentanyl, 726 (230) versus 1331 (678) ml/min, P < 0.05; propofol, 2046 (305) versus 2665 (223) ml/min, P < 0.05. Compared with the matched, normothermic intensive care unit patients, t(1/2) of morphine was significantly higher during TH. CL(tot) was lower during TH for morphine, fentanyl, and propofol but not for midazolam. Reducing the infusion rates of morphine, fentanyl, and propofol during TH is encouraged.

Comparison of GC/MS and LC/MS methods for the analysis of propofol and its metabolites in urine.

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS) were compared for their capacity to metabolite identification, sensitivity, and speed of analysis for propofol and its metabolites in urine samples. Acidic hydrolysis, liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), and trimethylsilyl (TMS) derivatization procedures were applied for GC/MS analysis. The LC/MS analysis used a simple sample pretreatment based on centrifugation and dilution. Propofol and four metabolites were successfully analyzed by GC/MS following TMS derivatization. One compound, di-isopropanolphenol was tentatively characterized as a new metabolite observed for the first time in human urine. The TMS derivatization greatly improved the chromatographic properties and detection sensitivity, especially for hydroxylated metabolites. The lower limits of quantitation (LLOQ) of propofol were about 325 and 0.51 ng/mL for the GC/MS scan mode and selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode, respectively. In addition, five conjugated propofol metabolites were successfully analyzed by LC-MS/MS in negative ion mode. The detection sensitivity for these conjugated metabolites could be greatly enhanced by the addition of triethylamine to the mobile phase without any loss of LC resolution capacity. The LLOQs of propofol-glucuronide (PG) were about 1.17 and 2.01 ng/mL for the LC-MS-selected ion monitoring (SIM) and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode, respectively. Both GC/MS and LC/MS methods sensitively detected nine metabolites of propofol and could be used to provide complementary data for the reasonable propofol metabolism study. Urinary excretion profiles for propofol and its metabolites following administration to human were suggested based on the total ion chromatograms obtained by GC/MS and LC/MS methods, respectively.

Urinary propofol metabolites in early life after single intravenous bolus.

BACKGROUND: /st> Propofol clearance is lower in neonates than in adults and displays extensive interindividual variability, in part explained by postmenstrual age (PMA) and postnatal age (PNA). Since propofol is almost exclusively cleared metabolically, urinary propofol metabolites were determined in early life and compared with similar observations reported in adults. METHODS: /st> Twenty-four hours urine collections were sampled after a single i.v. bolus of propofol (3 mg kg(-1)) in neonates undergoing procedural sedation. Clinical characteristics (PMA, PNA, weight, and cardiopathy) were recorded. Urine metabolites [propofol glucuronide (PG), 1- and 4-quinol glucuronide (QG)] were quantified using high-pressure liquid chromatography. Urine recovery (% administered dose) and the contribution of PG and QG to urinary elimination were calculated. Data were reported by median and range, analysed by Mann-Whitney U or Spearman's rank. RESULTS: /st> Eleven neonates (median PNA 11 days, PMA 38 weeks) were included. Median propofol metabolite recovery was 64% (range 34-98%). PG contributed 34% (range 8-67%) and QG 65% (range 33-92%). There was no significant correlation between either PMA, PNA, or cardiopathy and propofol metabolites. Compared with adults, the contribution of PG (34% vs 77%) was lower and the contribution of QG (65% vs 22%) was higher in neonates. CONCLUSIONS: /st> Propofol metabolism in neonates differs from adults, reflecting the age-dependent limited glucuronidation capacity. Hydroxylation to quinol metabolites already contributes to propofol metabolism. These differences likely explain the PMA- and PNA-dependent reduced propofol clearance in neonates.

Recovery and long-term renal excretion of propofol, its glucuronide, and two di-isopropylquinol glucuronides after propofol infusion during surgery.

BACKGROUND: The metabolism of the short-acting anaesthetic agent propofol has been described over the first 24 h. However, the long-term disposition of propofol and its metabolites is unclear. We describe the pharmacokinetics (renal excretion rates and renal clearance) of propofol and its metabolites over 60 h. METHODS: Ten patients undergoing lung surgery were included in the study. They received anaesthesia with continuous i.v. propofol at an average rate of 10 mg min(-1). During surgery and 60 h thereafter, we sampled blood and urine. Propofol and its metabolites were measured using gradient high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). RESULTS: In nine patients, propofol and its glucuronides were found in the plasma over the first 15 h. In the urine, however, even after 60 h, propofol and its quinol glucuronides were still detectable. One patient had a markedly different pharmacokinetic profile, showing a limited renal excretion or absorption of 12% of the dose. CONCLUSIONS: After an infusion of propofol, patients excrete propofol and its metabolites in the urine over a period in excess of 60 h. We hypothesize that (re)absorption of propofol and its metabolites by the kidney is a major process in elimination and that the reabsorbed compounds are gradually conjugated in the kidney and excreted in the urine. One patient showed a different pharmacokinetic profile for which we currently have no explanation.

Investigation of propofol renal elimination by HPLC using supported liquid membrane procedure for sample preparation.

One of the least explored subjects in the research on the metabolism of a widely used anaesthetic, propofol, is its excretion in an unchanged form. According to literature, the estimated percentage of applied propofol eliminated intact via kidneys is lower than 0.3%. The present study shows the amount of propofol excreted in an unchanged form with urine collected during the first 48 h after anaesthesia in five patients undergoing elective intracranial procedures. The drug was concentrated and selectively isolated from urine samples by supported liquid membrane technique and determined by HPLC with fluorescence detection. The amount of unchanged propofol eliminated with urine was approximately (0.004 +/- 0.002)% of the total applied dose. The obtained results may suggest that propofol in an unchanged form is not excreted by kidneys at all provided that all propofol determined in presented study originated from conjugates hydrolysis.

Propofol metabolites in man following propofol induction and maintenance.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics of propofol in man is characterized by a rapid metabolic clearance linked to glucuronidation of the parent drug to form the propofol-glucuronide (PG) and sulfo- and glucuro-conjugation of hydroxylated metabolite via cytochrome P450 to produce three other conjugates. The purpose of this study was to assess the urine metabolite profile of propofol following i.v. propofol anaesthesia in a Caucasian population. METHODS: The extent of phase I and phase II metabolism of propofol was studied in 18 female and 17 male patients after an anaesthesia induced and maintained for at least 4 h with propofol. The infusion rates (mg kg(-1) h(-1)) of propofol were (mean (SD)) 4.1 (1.0) and 4.5 (1.3) for males and females, respectively. Urine was collected from each patient for the periods 0-4, 4-8, 8-12, and 12-24 h after the start of propofol administration. In a preliminary study, the three main glucuro-conjugated metabolites were isolated from urine and characterized by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The quantification of these metabolites for the different collection periods was then performed by a HPLC-UV assay. RESULTS: Total recovery of propofol in the metabolites studied amounts to 38%, of which 62% was via the PG metabolite and 38% via cytochrome P-450. This percentage is significantly higher than that previously reported from patients after a bolus dose of propofol. Extreme values for PG (0-24 h period) were included from 73 to 49%. There was no significant difference between female and male patients in the metabolite ratio. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the extent of hydroxylation in propofol metabolism was higher than in previous findings after administration of anaesthetic doses of propofol. Moreover, the ratio between hydroxylation and glucuronidation of propofol is subject to an inter-patient variability but this does not correlate with the dose of propofol. However, the variation of the metabolite profile observed in the present report does not seem to indicate an extended role of metabolism in pharmacokinetic variability.

Detection of new propofol metabolites in human urine using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry techniques.

Using hyphenated analytical techniques, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS), a study on minor propofol metabolites in human urine was conducted. These techniques allowed identification of two new phase I metabolites (2-(omega-propanol)-6-isopropylphenol and 2-(omega-propanol)-6-isopropyl-1,4-quinol). In addition, their four corresponding conjugates (three glucuronides and one sulphate) were detected. Thus in human urine at least eight conjugate metabolites are produced, derived from four different aglycones (propofol; 2, 6-diisopropyl-1,4-quinol; 2-(omega-propanol)-6-isopropylphenol and 2-(omega-propanol)-6-isopropyl-1,4-quinol).

High-performance liquid chromatographic assay to detect hydroxylate and conjugate metabolites of propofol in human urine.

This paper describes a HPLC method for the simultaneous detection of phase I (2,6-diisopropyl-1-4-quinol and 2,6-diisopropyl-1-4-quinone) and phase II (4-(2,6-diisopropyl-1-4-quinol)-sulphate, 1-(2,6-diisopropyl-1-4-quinol)-glucuronide, 4-(2,6-diisopropyl-1-4-quinol)-glucuronide, and propofol-glucuronide) metabolites of propofol in human urine samples. Separation was based on a simple mobile phase and a reversed-phase chromatographic column. Metabolite identification was performed by UV spectrum on a diode-array detector and by LC-APCI-MS. The identification was also carried out using in vitro incubation mixtures (cytosol and microsomes prepared from liver) from several species: human, rat and rabbit. This assay was performed using UV, fluorescence and electrochemical detection modes. Each of these was analyzed and discussed.

Does use of propofol in heavy alcohol drinkers tend to discolor their urine?

A case in which the urine of a patient who was a heavy drinker turned pink when propofol was used for anesthesia is reported, and a new cause of the urine discoloration is proposed.

Direct high-performance liquid chromatography determination of propofol and its metabolite quinol with their glucuronide conjugates and preliminary pharmacokinetics in plasma and urine of man.

Propofol (P) is metabolized in humans by oxidation to 1,4-di-isopropylquinol (Q). P and Q are in turn conjugated with glucuronic acid to the respective glucuronides, propofol glucuronide (Pgluc), quinol-1-glucuronide (Q1G) and quinol-4-glucuronide (Q4G). Propofol and quinol with their glucuronide conjugates can be measured directly by gradient high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis without enzymic hydrolysis. The glucuronide conjugates were isolated by preparative HPLC from human urine samples. The glucuronides of P and Q were present in plasma and urine, P and Q were present in plasma, but not in urine. Quinol in plasma was present in the oxidised form, the quinone. Calibration curves of the respective glucuronides were constructed by enzymic deconjugation of isolated samples containing different concentrations of the glucuronides. The limit of quantitation of P and quinone in plasma are respectively 0.119 and 0.138 microg/ml. The limit of quantitation of the glucuronides in plasma are respectively: Pgluc 0.370 microg/ml, Q1G 1.02 microg/ml and Q4G 0.278 microg/ml. The corresponding values in urine are: Pgluc 0.264 microg/ml, Q1G 0.731 microg/ml and Q4G 0.199 microg/ml. A pharmacokinetic profile of P with its metabolites is shown, and some preliminary pharmacokinetic parameters of P and Q glucuronides are given.

Determination of diprivan in urine by a supported liquid membrane technique and liquid chromatography-electrochemical detection.

A supported liquid membrane technique was used for the extraction and enrichment of propofol in a spiked sample of urine. An acidic solution of propofol and thymol as an internal standard was passed over the membrane and after enrichment the acceptor solution was analyzed by LC with an electrochemical detector. The acceptor and donor pH, flow-rate, and volume of donor and different membrane solvents were varied to optimize the extraction efficiency. The detection limit for 100 ml of a spiked urine sample was 10 ppt of propofol.

Use of proton nmr spectroscopy to measure propofol metabolites in the urine of the female Caucasian patient.

1. Six female Caucasian patients received i.v. doses of propofol (2.7 +/- 0.3 (SE) mg/kg) for induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide, oxygen and enflurane for periods up to 3 h. A total urine collection was made from each subject for 24 h after administration of propofol; samples were concentrated and analysed for propofol metabolites by nmr spectroscopy. 2. By 24 h, 50.9 +/- 4.0% of the dose of propofol was recovered as metabolites. The proportions of propofol metabolites, 1-quinol glucuronide (1-QG), 4-quinol glucuronide (4-QG), propofol glucuronide (PG) and 4-quinol sulphate (4-QS) recovered in urine (0-24 h) of the patients were 12 +/- 1, 8 +/- 2, 76 +/- 4 and 4 +/- 1% respectively. However, one patient showed a metabolite profile in which PG comprised 93% and 1-QG 7% of the total metabolites. 3. Nmr spectroscopy has been shown to be a satisfactory method for the quantification of propofol metabolites in urine without the necessity for reference samples.