Calculation of Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings With and Without Inclusion of the Peer Grouping Step.

Importance: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Overall Star Rating is widely used by patients and consumers, and there is continued stakeholder curiosity surrounding the inclusion of a peer grouping step, implemented to the 2021 Overall Star Rating methods. Objective: To calculate hospital star rating scores with and without the peer grouping step, with the former approach stratifying hospitals into 3-, 4-, and 5-measure group peer groups based on the number of measure groups with at least 3 reported measures. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used Care Compare website data from January 2023 for 3076 hospitals that received a star rating in 2023. Data were analyzed from April 2023 to December 2023. Exposure: Peer grouping vs no peer grouping. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the distribution of star ratings, with 1 star being the lowest-performing hospitals and 5 stars, the highest. Analyses additionally identified the number of hospitals with a higher, lower, or identical star rating with the use of the peer grouping step compared with its nonuse, stratified by certain hospital characteristics. Results: Among 3076 hospitals that received a star rating in 2023, most were nonspecialty (1994 hospitals [64.8%]), nonteaching (1807 hospitals [58.7%]), non-safety net (2326 hospitals [75.6%]), non-critical access (2826 hospitals [91.9%]) hospitals with fewer than 200 beds (1822 hospitals [59.2%]) and located in an urban geographic designations (1935 hospitals [62.9%]). The presence of the peer grouping step resulted in 585 hospitals (19.0%) being assigned a different star rating than if the peer grouping step was absent, including considerably more hospitals receiving a higher star rating (517 hospitals) rather than a lower (68 hospitals) star rating. Hospital characteristics associated with a higher star rating included urbanicity (351 hospitals [67.9%]), non-safety net status (414 hospitals [80.1%]), and fewer than 200 beds (287 hospitals [55.6%]). Collectively, the presence of the peer grouping step supports a like-to-like comparison among hospitals and supports the ability of patients to assess overall hospital quality. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, inclusion of the peer grouping in the CMS star rating method resulted in modest changes in hospital star ratings compared with application of the method without peer grouping. Given improvement in face validity and the close association between the current peer grouping approach and stakeholder needs for peer-comparison, the current CMS Overall Star Rating method allows for durable comparisons in hospital performance.

Relation between pre-existing quality management measures and prevention and containment of COVID-19 outbreaks in 159 nursing homes in Tuscany: a mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: Nursing homes were often the focus of COVID-19 outbreaks. Many factors are known to influence the ability of a nursing home to prevent and contain a COVID-19 outbreak. The role of an organisation's quality management prior to the pandemic is not yet clear. In the Italian region of Tuscany nursing home performance indicators have been regularly collected since before the pandemic, providing the opportunity to better understand this relationship. OBJECTIVES: To test if there is a difference in the results achieved by nursing homes in Tuscany on 13 quality management indicators, when grouped by severity of COVID-19 outbreaks; and to better understand how these indicators may be related to the ability to control COVID-19 outbreaks, from the perspective of nursing homes. METHODS: We used a mixed methods sequential explanatory design. Based on regional and national databases, 159 nursing homes in Tuscany were divided into four groups by outbreak severity. We tested the significance of the differences between the groups with respect to 13 quality management indicators. The potential relation of these indicators to COVID-19 outbreaks was discussed with 29 managers and other nursing homes' staff through four group interviews. RESULTS: The quantitative analysis showed significant differences between the groups of nursing homes for 3 of the 13 indicators. From the perspective of nursing homes, the indicators might not be good at capturing important aspects of the ability to control COVID-19 outbreaks. For example, while staffing availability is seen as essential, the staff-to-bed ratio does not capture the turn-over of staff and temporary absences due to positive COVID-19 testing of staff. CONCLUSIONS: Though currently collected indicators are key for overall performance monitoring and improvement, further refinement of the set of quality management indicators is needed to clarify the relationship with nursing homes' ability to control COVID-19 outbreaks.

Patient Safety Indicators During the Initial COVID-19 Pandemic Surge in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic presented a challenge to inpatient safety. It is unknown whether there were spillover effects due to COVID-19 into non-COVID-19 care and safety. We sought to evaluate the changes in inpatient Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality patient safety indicators (PSIs) in the United States before and during the first surge of the pandemic among patients admitted without COVID-19. METHODS: We analyzed trends in PSIs from January 2019 to June 2020 in patients without COVID-19 using data from IBM MarketScan Commercial Database. We included members of employer-sponsored or Medicare supplemental health plans with inpatient, non-COVID-19 admissions. The primary outcomes were risk-adjusted composite and individual PSIs. RESULTS: We analyzed 1,869,430 patients admitted without COVID-19. Among patients without COVID-19, the composite PSI score was not significantly different when comparing the first surge (Q2 2020) to the prepandemic period (e.g., Q2 2020 score of 2.46 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.34-2.58] versus Q1 2020 score of 2.37 [95% CI, 2.27-2.46]; P = 0.22). Individual PSIs for these patients during Q2 2020 were also not significantly different, except in-hospital fall with hip fracture (e.g., Q2 2020 was 3.42 [95% CI, 3.34-3.49] versus Q4 2019 was 2.45 [95% CI, 2.40-2.50]; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The first surge of COVID-19 was not associated with worse inpatient safety for patients without COVID-19, highlighting the ability of the healthcare system to respond to the initial surge of the pandemic.

Evaluation of ICUs and weight of quality control indicators: an exploratory study based on Chinese ICU quality data from 2015 to 2020.

This study aimed to explore key quality control factors that affected the prognosis of intensive care unit (ICU) patients in Chinese mainland over six years (2015-2020). The data for this study were from 31 provincial and municipal hospitals (3425 hospital ICUs) and included 2 110 685 ICU patients, for a total of 27 607 376 ICU hospitalization days. We found that 15 initially established quality control indicators were good predictors of patient prognosis, including percentage of ICU patients out of all inpatients (%), percentage of ICU bed occupancy of total inpatient bed occupancy (%), percentage of all ICU inpatients with an APACHE II score ⩾15 (%), three-hour (surviving sepsis campaign) SSC bundle compliance (%), six-hour SSC bundle compliance (%), rate of microbe detection before antibiotics (%), percentage of drug deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis (%), percentage of unplanned endotracheal extubations (%), percentage of patients reintubated within 48 hours (%), unplanned transfers to the ICU (%), 48-h ICU readmission rate (%), ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) (per 1000 ventilator days), catheter related blood stream infection (CRBSI) (per 1000 catheter days), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) (per 1000 catheter days), in-hospital mortality (%). When exploratory factor analysis was applied, the 15 indicators were divided into 6 core elements that varied in weight regarding quality evaluation: nosocomial infection management (21.35%), compliance with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines (17.97%), ICU resources (17.46%), airway management (15.53%), prevention of deep-vein thrombosis (14.07%), and severity of patient condition (13.61%). Based on the different weights of the core elements associated with the 15 indicators, we developed an integrated quality scoring system defined as F score=21.35%xnosocomial infection management + 17.97%xcompliance with SSC guidelines + 17.46%×ICU resources + 15.53%×airway management + 14.07%×DVT prevention + 13.61%×severity of patient condition. This evidence-based quality scoring system will help in assessing the key elements of quality management and establish a foundation for further optimization of the quality control indicator system.

Análise dos indicadores de qualidade em uma unidade de terapia intensiva adulto: um estudo descritivo / Analysis of quality indicators in an adult intensive care unit: a descriptive study

OBJETIVO: Analisar os resultados obtidos pelos indicadores de qualidade em assistência à saúde monitorados em uma unidade de terapia intensiva adulto. MÉTODO: Estudo descritivo com análise retrospectiva dos relatórios de indicadores de uma unidade de terapia intensiva adulto. RESULTADOS: Dos 33 indicadores, nove referem-se ao funcionamento global do setor, destacando-se a baixa taxa de reinternação em 24 horas (0,8%); 14 referem-se aos dispositivos invasivos, com predomínio da utilização de cateteres vesicais de demora (63,2%), venosos periféricos (59,8%) e nasogástricos/nasoentéricos (50,0%); seis referem-se a incidentes não infecciosos, destacando-se a incidência de lesão por pressão (5,2%), obstrução (2,7%) e remoção de cateter nasogástrico/nasoentérico (2,3%); e quatro abordam os incidentes infecciosos, com destaque para a densidade de incidência de pneumonia associada à ventilação mecânica (37,8 por 1000 pacientes-dia). CONCLUSÃO: Foram observados aspectos positivos, como o predomínio de altas hospitalares e baixa taxa de reinternação, e aspectos negativos, como a ocorrência de incidentes.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results of quality indicators in healthcare assistance monitored in an adult intensive care unit. METHOD: A descriptive study with a retrospective analysis of the indicator reports from an adult intensive care unit. RESULTS: Of the 33 indicators, nine are related to the overall functioning of the unit, with a low readmission rate within 24 hours (0.8%). Fourteen indicators are related to invasive devices, with a predominance of use for indwelling urinary catheters (63.2%), peripheral venous catheters (59.8%), and nasogastric/nasoenteric tubes (50.0%). Six indicators pertain to non-infectious incidents, highlighting pressure ulcer incidence (5.2%), obstruction (2.7%), and removal of nasogastric/nasoenteric tubes (2.3%). Additionally, four indicators address infectious incidents, with a significant incidence density of ventilator-associated pneumonia (37.8 per 1000 patient days). CONCLUSION: Positive aspects were observed, such as a predominance of hospital discharges and low readmission rates, while negative aspects included incidents.

Evaluation of ICUs and weight of quality control indicators: an exploratory study based on Chinese ICU quality data from 2015 to 2020 / 医学前沿

This study aimed to explore key quality control factors that affected the prognosis of intensive care unit (ICU) patients in Chinese mainland over six years (2015-2020). The data for this study were from 31 provincial and municipal hospitals (3425 hospital ICUs) and included 2 110 685 ICU patients, for a total of 27 607 376 ICU hospitalization days. We found that 15 initially established quality control indicators were good predictors of patient prognosis, including percentage of ICU patients out of all inpatients (%), percentage of ICU bed occupancy of total inpatient bed occupancy (%), percentage of all ICU inpatients with an APACHE II score ⩾15 (%), three-hour (surviving sepsis campaign) SSC bundle compliance (%), six-hour SSC bundle compliance (%), rate of microbe detection before antibiotics (%), percentage of drug deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis (%), percentage of unplanned endotracheal extubations (%), percentage of patients reintubated within 48 hours (%), unplanned transfers to the ICU (%), 48-h ICU readmission rate (%), ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) (per 1000 ventilator days), catheter related blood stream infection (CRBSI) (per 1000 catheter days), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) (per 1000 catheter days), in-hospital mortality (%). When exploratory factor analysis was applied, the 15 indicators were divided into 6 core elements that varied in weight regarding quality evaluation: nosocomial infection management (21.35%), compliance with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines (17.97%), ICU resources (17.46%), airway management (15.53%), prevention of deep-vein thrombosis (14.07%), and severity of patient condition (13.61%). Based on the different weights of the core elements associated with the 15 indicators, we developed an integrated quality scoring system defined as F score=21.35%xnosocomial infection management + 17.97%xcompliance with SSC guidelines + 17.46%×ICU resources + 15.53%×airway management + 14.07%×DVT prevention + 13.61%×severity of patient condition. This evidence-based quality scoring system will help in assessing the key elements of quality management and establish a foundation for further optimization of the quality control indicator system.

Readmission Reduction as a Hospital Quality Measure: Time to Move on to More Pressing Concerns?

The authors of this Viewpoint argue that the focus on hospital readmission rates as a measure of quality during the past decade, although undoubtedly leading to some improvements in care, has had minimal demonstrable benefit and has even distracted clinicians and health system leaders from other crucial quality concerns.

Avaliação da cobertura vacinal da poliomielite nos estados da região sul, com foco no município de Pato Branco, entre os anos de 2009-2019 / Assessment of polio vaccination coverage in the southern states, focusing on the municipality of Pato Branco, from 2009-2019 / Evaluación de la cobertura de vacunación contra la poliomielitis en los estados de la región sur, con enfoque en el municipio de Pato Branco, entre los años 2009-2019

Objetivo: Analisar a taxa de cobertura vacinal da poliomielite em relação às metas de vacinação de 95% da população-alvo, estabelecidas pelo Ministério da Saúde, com base nos registros de imunização do DATASUS nos estados do Paraná, Santa Catarina e Rio Grande do Sul, que compõem a região sul do Brasil, e na cidade de Pato Branco, PR. Métodos: Estudo descritivo de abordagem quantitativa referente à cobertura vacinal da Poliomielite nos estados da região sul e no município de Pato Branco, PR com resultados da cobertura avaliados quanto ao alcance das metas estabelecidas pelo Ministério da Saúde e comparado o desempenho entre os estados e o município no período de 2009 a 2019. Os dados foram recolhidos da seção de Imunizações do DATASUS, o departamento de informática do Sistema Único de Saúde do Brasil. Resultados: No período analisado, o município de Pato Branco se manteve com uma taxa satisfatória em relação à meta estabelecida pelo Ministério da Saúde, exceto nos anos de 2017 e 2018, onde ficou abaixo da meta em cerca de 3% e 11%, respectivamente. Em relação aos estados do sul, o estado do Paraná mostrou-se abaixo da meta de cobertura vacinal recomendada na maioria dos anos estudados, com a menor cobertura ocorrendo em 2017, ficando 15% abaixo do esperado; o estado de Santa Catarina, apesar de apresentar queda desde o ano de 2014, apresentou os melhores índices de cobertura vacinal, com a maior taxa de queda de cobertura no ano de 2018 com cerca de 7%; e o estado do Rio Grande do Sul se apresentou como o estado com o pior desempenho na região, demonstrando quedas significativas da cobertura desde 2010, com menor taxa de vacinação em 2017, ficando 18% abaixo do esperado. Conclusões: Pode-se observar uma queda nos valores da cobertura vacinal entre os anos de 2009 a 2019, tanto no município de Pato Branco, PR, quanto nos estados do Paraná, Santa Catarina e Rio Grande do Sul, algo que é motivo de crescente preocupação pelos serviços de saúde do país devido à possibilidade de reintrodução da doença no território nacional. Ressalta-se, então, a necessidade de criação de estratégias eficazes para o combate das quedas das taxas de cobertura vacinal no país.

Objective: To analyze the rate of polio vaccination coverage in relation to the vaccination goals of 95% of the target population, set by the Ministry of Health, based on DATASUS immunization records in the states of Paraná, Santa Catarina, and Rio Grande do Sul, which make up the southern region of Brazil, and in the city of Pato Branco, PR. Methods: A descriptive study of quantitative approach regarding the vaccination coverage of Poliomyelitis in the states of the southern region and in the municipality of Pato Branco, PR with coverage results evaluated as to the achievement of the goals set by the Ministry of Health and compared performance between the states and the municipality in the period from 2009 to 2019. The data were collected from the Immunizations section of DATASUS, the computer department of the Brazilian Unified Health System. Results: In the period analyzed, the municipality of Pato Branco remained with a satisfactory rate in relation to the target set by the Ministry of Health, except in the years 2017 and 2018, where it was below the target by about 3% and 11%, respectively. Regarding the southern states, the state of Paraná showed below the recommended vaccine coverage target in most of the years studied, with the lowest coverage occurring in 2017, being 15% below expected; the state of Santa Catarina, despite showing a drop since the year 2014, showed the best rates of vaccine coverage, with the highest rate of drop in coverage in the year 2018 with about 7%; and the state of Rio Grande do Sul presented itself as the state with the worst performance in the region, showing significant drops in coverage since 2010, with the lowest rate of vaccination in 2017, being 18% below expectations. Conclusions: A drop in vaccination coverage values can be observed between the years 2009 and 2019, both in the municipality of Pato Branco, PR, and in the states of Paraná, Santa Catarina, and Rio Grande do Sul, something that is a cause of growing concern for the country's health services due to the possibility of reintroduction of the disease in the national territory. Therefore, the need to create effective strategies to combat the declines in vaccination coverage rates in the country is highlighted.

Objetivo: Analizar la tasa de cobertura de vacunación antipoliomielítica en relación con las metas de vacunación del 95% de la población objetivo, establecidas por el Ministerio de Salud, a partir de los registros de inmunización DATASUS en los estados de Paraná, Santa Catarina y Rio Grande do Sul, que conforman la región sur de Brasil, y en la ciudad de Pato Branco, PR. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo de abordaje cuantitativo referente a la cobertura vacunal de la Poliomielitis en los estados de la región sur y en el municipio de Pato Branco, PR con resultados de la cobertura evaluados en cuanto al alcance de las metas establecidas por el Ministerio de Salud y comparado el rendimiento entre los estados y el municipio en el período de 2009 a 2019. Los datos se recogieron de la sección de Inmunizaciones de DATASUS, el departamento de informática del Sistema Único de Salud de Brasil. Resultados: En el período analizado, el municipio de Pato Branco se mantuvo con una tasa satisfactoria en relación a la meta establecida por el Ministerio de Salud, excepto en los años 2017 y 2018, donde estuvo por debajo de la meta en cerca de 3% y 11%, respectivamente. En lo que respecta a los estados del sur, el estado de Paraná se mostró por debajo de la meta de cobertura vacunal recomendada en la mayoría de los años estudiados, siendo la cobertura más baja la que se produjo en el año 2017, estando un 15% por debajo de lo esperado; el estado de Santa Catarina, a pesar de mostrar una caída desde el año 2014, mostró los mejores índices de cobertura vacunal, siendo la mayor tasa de caída de la cobertura en el año 2018 con cerca de un 7%; y el estado de Río Grande do Sul se presentó como el estado con peor desempeño en la región, demostrando caídas significativas en la cobertura desde 2010, con la tasa de vacunación más baja en 2017, siendo un 18% por debajo de lo esperado. Conclusiones: Se observa una caída en los valores de las coberturas de vacunación entre los años 2009 y 2019, tanto en el municipio de Pato Branco, PR, como en los estados de Paraná, Santa Catarina y Rio Grande do Sul, algo que es motivo de creciente preocupación para los servicios de salud del país debido a la posibilidad de reintroducción de la enfermedad en el territorio nacional. Por lo tanto, se destaca la necesidad de crear estrategias eficaces para combatir el descenso de las tasas de cobertura de vacunación en el país.

Países das Américas devem redobrar esforços para alcançar meta de 70% de vacinação contra COVID-19

À medida que os casos de COVID-19 continuam aumentando nas Américas pela oitava semana consecutiva, a diretora da Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (OPAS), Carissa F. Etienne, pediu aos países que aumentem os esforços para alcançar a meta de 70% de cobertura vacinal estabelecida pela Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) até meados de 2022.

A population-based study of administrative data linkage to measure melanoma surgical and pathology quality.

BACKGROUND: Continuous quality improvement is important for cancer systems. However, collecting and compiling quality indicator data can be time-consuming and resource-intensive. Here we explore the utility and feasibility of linked routinely collected health data to capture key elements of quality of care for melanoma in a single-payer, universal health care setting. METHOD: This pilot study utilized a retrospective population-based cohort from a previously developed linked administrative data set, with a 65% random sample of all invasive cutaneous melanoma cases diagnosed 2007-2012 in the province of Ontario. Data from the Ontario Cancer Registry was utilized, supplemented with linked pathology report data from Cancer Care Ontario, and other linked administrative data describing health care utilization. Quality indicators identified through provincial guidelines and international consensus were evaluated for potential collection with administrative data and measured where possible. RESULTS: A total of 7,654 cases of melanoma were evaluated. Ten of 25 (40%) candidate quality indicators were feasible to be collected with the available administrative data. Many indicators (8/25) could not be measured due to unavailable clinical information (e.g. width of clinical margins). Insufficient pathology information (6/25) or health structure information (1/25) were less common reasons. Reporting of recommended variables in pathology reports varied from 65.2% (satellitosis) to 99.6% (body location). For stage IB-II or T1b-T4a melanoma patients where SLNB should be discussed, approximately two-thirds met with a surgeon experienced in SLNB. Of patients undergoing full lymph node dissection, 76.2% had adequate evaluation of the basin. CONCLUSIONS: We found that use of linked administrative data sources is feasible for measurement of melanoma quality in some cases. In those cases, findings suggest opportunities for quality improvement. Consultation with surgeons offering SLNB was limited, and pathology report completeness was sub-optimal, but was prior to routine synoptic reporting. However, to measure more quality indicators, text-based data sources will require alternative approaches to manual collection such as natural language processing or standardized collection. We recommend development of robust data platforms to support continuous re-evaluation of melanoma quality indicators, with the goal of optimizing quality of care for melanoma patients on an ongoing basis.

The 2018 Merit-based Incentive Payment System: Participation, Performance, and Payment Across Specialties.

BACKGROUND: The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) incorporates financial incentives and penalties intended to drive clinicians towards value-based purchasing, including alternative payment models (APMs). Newly available Medicare-approved qualified clinical data registries (QCDRs) offer specialty-specific quality measures for clinician reporting, yet their impact on clinician performance and payment adjustments remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: We sought to characterize clinician participation, performance, and payment adjustments in the MIPS program across specialties, with a focus on clinician use of QCDRs. RESEARCH DESIGN: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the 2018 MIPS program. RESULTS: During the 2018 performance year, 558,296 clinicians participated in the MIPS program across the 35 specialties assessed. Clinicians reporting as individuals had lower overall MIPS performance scores (median [interquartile range (IQR)], 80.0 [39.4-98.4] points) than those reporting as groups (median [IQR], 96.3 [76.9-100.0] points), who in turn had lower adjustments than clinicians reporting within MIPS APMs (median [IQR], 100.0 [100.0-100.0] points) (P<0.001). Clinicians reporting as individuals had lower payment adjustments (median [IQR], +0.7% [0.1%-1.6%]) than those reporting as groups (median [IQR], +1.5% [0.6%-1.7%]), who in turn had lower adjustments than clinicians reporting within MIPS APMs (median [IQR], +1.7% [1.7%-1.7%]) (P<0.001). Within a subpopulation of 202,685 clinicians across 12 specialties commonly using QCDRs, clinicians had overall MIPS performance scores and payment adjustments that were significantly greater if reporting at least 1 QCDR measure compared with those not reporting any QCDR measures. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, these findings highlight that performance score and payment adjustments varied by reporting affiliation and QCDR use in the 2018 MIPS.

Quality of Care for Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Data From the American College of Rheumatology RISE Registry.

OBJECTIVE: Although multiple national quality measures focus on the management and safety of rheumatoid arthritis, few measures address the care of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Our objective was to apply a group of quality measures relevant to the care of patients with SLE, and we used the American College of Rheumatology's Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) registry to assess nationwide variations in care. METHODS: The data derived from RISE and included patients who had ≥2 visits with SLE codes ≥30 days apart in 2017-2018. We calculated performance on 5 quality measures: renal disease screening, blood pressure assessment and management, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) prescribing, safe dosing for HCQ, and prolonged glucocorticoid use at doses of >7.5 mg/day. We reported performance on these measures at the practice level. We used logistic regression to assess independent predictors of performance after adjusting for sociodemographic and utilization factors. RESULTS: We included 27,567 unique patients from 186 practices; 91.7% were female and 48% White, with a mean age of 53.5 ± 15.2 years. Few patients had adequate screening for the development of renal manifestations (39.5%). Although blood pressure assessment was common (94.4%), a meaningful fraction of patients had untreated hypertension (17.7%). Many received HCQ (71.5%), but only 62% at doses of ≤5.0 mg/kg/day. Some received at least moderate-dose steroids for ≥90 days (18.5%). We observed significant practice variation on every measure. CONCLUSION: We found potential gaps in care for patients with SLE across the US. Although some performance variation may be explained by differences in disease severity, dramatic differences suggest that developing quality measures to address important health care processes in SLE may improve care.

Significant Gains in Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality Measures Among RISE Registry Practices.

OBJECTIVE: Using the American College of Rheumatology Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) registry, our objective was to examine performance on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) quality measures and to assess the association between practice characteristics and changes in performance over time among participating practices. METHODS: We analyzed data from practices enrolled in RISE between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017. Eight quality measures in the areas of RA disease management, cardiovascular risk reduction, and patient safety were examined. Variability in performance was evaluated at the practice level. Multivariate linear models were used to predict change in measure performance by year and to determine the effect of practice characteristics on change in performance over time. RESULTS: Data from 59,986 patients from 54 practices were examined. The mean ± SD age was 62 ± 14 years, 77% were female, 69% were Caucasian, and most patients were seen in a single-specialty group practice (46%). The average performance on measures related to RA treatments was consistently high (>90%) across the study period. Measures related to RA functional status and disease activity assessment had the greatest improvements over time (8.4% and 13.0% increase per year, respectively; P < 0.001). Single-specialty group practices had the fastest rates of improvement over time across all measures. CONCLUSION: Among practices participating in RISE between 2015 and 2017, performance on most RA quality measures improved. Single-specialty group practices saw the fastest rates of improvement over time. Identification of workflow patterns leading to dramatic improvements in quality of care will help guide process redesign to address gaps in priority areas, such as tuberculosis screening and blood pressure control.

Interaction between stroke severity and quality indicators of acute stroke care: a single-center retrospective analysis.

Ischemic stroke leads to substantial mortality and morbidity worldwide. Door-to-CT time, door-to-needle time (DNT), and door-to-groin time (DGT) are important quality indicators of stroke care. However, patient characteristics remain important determinants of outcome as well. In this single-center study, we investigated the interaction between these quality indicators and stroke severity regarding long-term functional outcome. All consecutive stroke patients treated at the ZOL stroke center, Genk, Belgium, between 2017 and 2020 were included in this retrospective observational study. Stroke severity was graded as "mild" if National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was equal to or lower than 8, "moderate" if NIHSS was between 9 and 15, and "severe" if NIHSS was higher than 16. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were collected before and 3 months after stroke. Ordinal regression analysis with correction for patient characteristics of functional outcome was done. A total of 1255 patients were included, of which 84% suffered an ischemic CVA (n = 1052) and 16% a TIA (n = 203). The proportion of patients treated conservatively or with thrombolysis, thrombectomy, or the combination of both differed according to stroke severity (p < 0.0001). Door-to-CT time was longer in mild and moderate stroke (p < 0.0001). Median DNT also differed between stroke categories: 46 (IQR 31-70) min for mild vs. 36 (25-56) min for moderate vs. 30 (21-45) min for severe stroke (p = 0.0002). Median DGT did not differ between stroke severity categories (p = 0.15). NIHSS on admission and pre-stroke mRS were independently associated with mRS at 90 days. Operational performance, reflected in door-to-CT time and DNT, was worse in patients with mild and moderate stroke severity. DNT was also associated with functional outcome in our center, along with pre-stroke mRS, NIHSS on admission and age.

A statewide quality improvement collaborative significantly improves quality metric adherence and physician engagement in vascular surgery.

BACKGROUND: Quality improvement national registries provide structured, clinically relevant outcome and process-of-care data to practitioners-with regional meetings to disseminate best practices. However, whether a quality improvement collaborative affects processes of care is less clear. We examined the effects of a statewide hospital collaborative on the adherence rates to best practice guidelines in vascular surgery. METHODS: A large statewide retrospective quality improvement database was reviewed for 2013 to 2019. Hospitals participating in the quality improvement collaborative were required to submit adherence and outcomes data and meet semiannually. They received an incentive through a pay for participation model. The aggregate adherence rates among all hospitals were calculated and compared. RESULTS: A total of 39 hospitals participated in the collaborative, with attendance of surgeon champions at face-to-face meetings of >85%. Statewide, the hospital systems improved every year of participation in the collaborative across most "best practice" domains, including adherence to preoperative skin preparation recommendations (odds ratio [OR], 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.76-1.79; P < .001), intraoperative antibiotic redosing (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02-1.17; P = .018), statin use at discharge for appropriate patients (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.16-1.2; P < .001), and reducing transfusions for asymptomatic patients with hemoglobin >8 mg/dL (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.66-0.66; P < .001). The use of antiplatelet therapy at discharge remained high and did not change significantly during the study period. Teaching hospital and urban or rural status did not affect adherence. The adherence rates exceeded the professional society mean rates for guideline adherence. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a statewide hospital collaborative with incentivized semiannual meetings resulted in significant improvements in adherence to "best practice" guidelines across a large, heterogeneous group of hospitals.

Applicability of contemporary quality indicators in vestibular surgery-do they accurately measure tumor inherent postoperative complications of vestibular schwannomas?

BACKGROUND: Due to rising costs in health care delivery, reimbursement decisions have progressively been based on quality measures. Such quality indicators have been developed for neurosurgical procedures, collectively. We aimed to evaluate their applicability in patients that underwent surgery for vestibular schwannoma and to identify potential new disease-specific quality indicators. METHODS: One hundred and three patients operated due to vestibular schwannoma were subject to analysis. The primary outcomes of interest were 30-day and 90-day reoperation, readmission, mortality, nosocomial infection and surgical site infection (SSI) rates, postoperative cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) leak, facial, and hearing function. The secondary aim was the identification of prognostic factors for the mentioned primary outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-day (90-days) outcomes in terms of reoperation were 10.7% (14.6%), readmission 9.7% (13.6%), mortality 1% (1%), nosocomial infection 5.8%, and SSI 1% (1%). A 30- versus 90-day outcome in terms of CSF leak were 6.8% vs. 10.7%, new facial nerve palsy 16.5% vs. 6.1%. Hearing impairment from serviceable to non-serviceable hearing was 6.8% at both 30- and 90-day outcome. The degree of tumor extension has a significant impact on reoperation (p < 0.001), infection (p = 0.015), postoperative hemorrhage (p < 0.001), and postoperative hearing loss (p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate the importance of entity-specific quality measurements being applied even after 30 days. We identified the occurrence of a CSF leak within 90 days postoperatively, new persistent facial nerve palsy still present 90 days postoperatively, and persisting postoperative hearing impairment to non-serviceable hearing as potential new quality measurement variables for patients undergoing surgery for vestibular schwannoma.

Validação de indicadores para monitoramento da qualidade do pré-natal / Validación de indicadores para el seguimiento de la calidad de la atención prenatal / Validation of indicators for monitoring the quality of prenatal care

Resumo Objetivo validar indicadores para o monitoramento da qualidade da assistência pré-natal. Método estudo metodológico, com 11 especialistas da Linha de Cuidado à Saúde Materna e Infantil do Paraná, realizado em 2020. Os indicadores foram organizados em domínios de um modelo lógico e na tríade estrutura, processo e resultado. Analisado Taxa de Concordância, Razão de Validade de Conteúdo, Índice de Validade de Conteúdo e confiabilidade pelo Alfa de Cronbach. Resultados elaboração de 35 indicadores e, após os procedimentos de validação foram readequados quanto a clareza, dois foram excluídos. Apresentaram confiabilidade excelente para clareza e relevância da estrutura (0,94), do processo (0,98) e do resultado (0,94); bem como, em relação aos domínios do modelo lógico de entradas (0,96), atividades (0,86), saídas (0,98), resultados (0,86) e impacto (0,96). Conclusão os indicadores apresentam validade e confiabilidade para da qualidade do pré-natal, sob a ótica do monitoramento e da qualidade em saúde. Implicações para a Prática o constructo apresenta flexibilidade de aplicação para diversas dimensões territoriais como municípios, regionais de saúde e estado.

Resumen Objetivo validar indicadores para el seguimiento de la calidad de la atención prenatal. Método estudio metodológico, con 11 especialistas de la Línea de Atención Materno infantil de Paraná, indicadores organizados en dominios de un modelo lógico y en la organización de la tríada estructura, proceso y resultado, realizado en 2020. Tasa de Concordancia Calculada, Razón de Validez de Contenido, Índice de Validez de Contenido; y confiabilidad por Alfa de Cronbach. Resultados Se elaboraron 35 indicadores, que luego de reajustar los procedimientos de validación para mayor claridad, se excluyeron dos. Mostró una excelente confiabilidad para la claridad y relevancia de la estructura (0.94), el proceso (0.98) y el resultado (0.94); así como en relación con los dominios del modelo lógico de insumos (0,96), actividades (0,86), productos (0,98), resultados (0,86) e impacto (0,96). Conclusión los indicadores son válidos y confiables para evaluar la calidad de la atención prenatal, reflejando el impacto de esta atención en la gestión de la calidad. Implicaciones para la práctica El constructo presenta flexibilidad de aplicación para varias dimensiones territoriales como municipios, salud regional y estadual.

Abstract Objective to validate indicators for monitoring the quality of prenatal care. Method methodological study conducted in 2020 with 11 specialists of the maternal and child health care line of Paraná. The indicators were organized in domains of a logical model and in the triad structure, process, and result. The calculated agreement rate, content validity ratio, content validity index, and Cronbach's alpha reliability were analyzed. Results 35 indicators were elaborated, which after the validation procedures were readjusted for clarity, two were excluded. It showed excellent reliability for clarity and relevance of the structure (0.94), process (0.98), and result (0.94), as well as in relation to the domains of the logical model of inputs (0.96), activities (0.86), outputs (0.98), results (0.86), and impact (0.96). Conclusion the indicators are valid and reliable for evaluating the quality of prenatal care, reflecting the impact of this care on quality management. Implications for Practice The construct presents flexibility of application for several territorial dimensions such as municipalities, regional health, and state.

SeDREno study - Prevalence of hospital malnutrition according to GLIM criteria, ten years after the PREDyCES study / Estudio SeDREno: prevalencia de la desnutrición hospitalaria según los criterios GLIM, diez años después del estudio PREDyCES

Background & aims: the last large multicenter study on disease-related malnutrition (DRM) in Spain (the PREDyCES study) showed a 23.7 % prevalence of malnutrition, according to the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002) tool. The main objective of the SeDREno study was to assess the prevalence of hospital malnutrition upon admission, according to GLIM criteria, ten years later. Methods: a cross-sectional, observational, multicenter study in standard clinical practice, conducted in 17 hospitals during a period of five to seven days. Patients were initially screened using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), and then assessed using the GLIM criteria for diagnosis and severity grading. Results: a total of 2,185 patients, 54.8 % males, mean age 67.1 (17.0) years (50.2 % aged ≥ 70 years), were evaluated. Malnutrition was observed in 29.7 % of patients according to GLIM criteria (12.5 % severe, 17.2 % moderate). In patients ≥ 70 years malnutrition was observed in 34.8 %. The clinical conditions significantly associated with a higher prevalence of malnutrition were dysphagia (47.6 %), cognitive impairment (43.4 %), cancer (39.1 %), gastrointestinal disease (37.7 %), diabetes (34.8 %), and cardiovascular disease (33.4 %). The multivariate analysis revealed that gender, BMI, diabetes, cancer, gastrointestinal disorders, and polypharmacy were the main independent factors associated with DRM. Malnutrition was associated with an increase in length of hospital stay and death (p < 0.001). (AU)

Antecedentes y objetivos: el último gran estudio multicéntrico sobre desnutrición relacionada con la enfermedad (DRE) en España (el estudio PREDyCES) mostró una prevalencia de desnutrición del 23,7 % según la herramienta Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002). El principal objetivo del estudio SeDREno fue evaluar la prevalencia de la desnutrición hospitalaria al ingreso según los criterios GLIM diez años después. Métodos: estudio transversal, observacional, multicéntrico, según la práctica clínica estándar, realizado en 17 hospitales durante un período de cinco a siete días. Los pacientes fueron evaluados inicialmente con la herramienta de detección universal de desnutrición (MUST) y luego con los criterios GLIM para el diagnóstico de DRE y la clasificación de la gravedad. Resultados: se evaluaron 2185 pacientes, con un 54,8 % de varones, una edad media de 67,1 (17,0) años (50,2 % ≥ 70 años). Se observó desnutrición en el 29,7 % de los pacientes según los criterios GLIM (12,5 % grave, 17,2 % moderada). Entre los pacientes ≥ 70 años se observó desnutrición en el 34,8 %. Las condiciones clínicas asociadas significativamente con una mayor prevalencia de desnutrición fueron la disfagia (47,6 %), el deterioro cognitivo (43,4 %), el cáncer (39,1 %), las enfermedades gastrointestinales (37,7 %), la diabetes (34,8 %) y la patología cardiovascular (33,4 %). El análisis multivariante reveló que el sexo, el IMC, la diabetes, el cáncer, los trastornos gastrointestinales y la polimedicación eran los principales factores independientes asociados a la DRE. La desnutrición se asoció a un aumento de la duración de la estancia hospitalaria y la muerte (p < 0,001). (AU)

The influence of hospital-level variables on hip fracture outcomes.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of hospital-level service characteristics on hip fracture outcomes and quality of care processes measures. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of publicly available audit data obtained from the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) 2018 benchmark summary and Facilities Survey. Data extraction was performed using a dedicated proforma to identify relevant hospital-level care process and outcome variables for inclusion. The primary outcome measure was adjusted 30-day mortality rate. A random forest-based multivariate imputation by chained equation (MICE) algorithm was used for missing value imputation. Univariable analysis for each hospital level factor was performed using a combination of Tobit regression, Siegal non-parametric linear regression, and Mann-Whitney U test analyses, dependent on the data type. In all analyses, a p-value < 0.05 denoted statistical significance. RESULTS: Analyses included 176 hospitals, with a median of 366 hip fracture cases per year (interquartile range (IQR) 280 to 457). Aggregated data from 66,578 patients were included. The only identified hospital-level variable associated with the primary outcome of 30-day mortality was hip fracture trial involvement (no trial involvement: median 6.3%; trial involvement: median 5.7%; p = 0.039). Significant key associations were also identified between prompt surgery and presence of dedicated hip fracture sessions; reduced acute length of stay and both a higher number of hip fracture cases per year and more dedicated hip fracture operating lists; Best Practice Tariff attainment and greater number of hip fracture cases per year, more dedicated hip fracture operating lists, presence of a dedicated hip fracture ward, and hip fracture trial involvement. CONCLUSION: Exploratory analyses have identified that improved outcomes in hip fracture may be associated with hospital-level service characteristics, such as hip fracture research trial involvement, larger hip fracture volumes, and the use of theatre lists dedicated to hip fracture surgery. Further research using patient level data is warranted to corroborate these findings. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(10):1627-1632.