Estudo randomizado, aberto, utilizando protetor cutâneo em spray à base de terpolímero acrílico versus hidratante padrão na prevenção de radiodermatite aguda em pacientes com câncer de canal anal e reto / An open randomized study using a skin protector spray made of acrylic terpolymers versus and standardized moisturizer in preventing acute radiodermatitis in patients with anal and rectal cancer

Pacientes com câncer de canal anal e reto em tratamento por radioterapia apresentam alta prevalência de radiodermatite com descamação úmida, desfecho que causa impactos clínicos, econômicos e sociais. Estudos sobre a efetividade de produtos na prevenção das radiodermatites representam uma lacuna de conhecimento na área oncológica, podendo o seu desenvolvimento contribuir para a diminuição dos impactos negativos desse evento, do tempo ocioso do equipamento pela interrupção do tratamento e da possibilidade de falha local da doença. Objetivou-se analisar a efetividade do protetor cutâneo em spray à base de terpolímero acrílico na prevenção da radiodermatite com descamação úmida nos pacientes com câncer de canal anal e reto em comparação com um hidratante padronizado na instituição à base de Calendula officinalis L. e Aloe barbadensis. Ensaio clínico randomizado, aberto, em instituição única, referência nacional no tratamento de doenças oncológicas, com amostra 63 pacientes que foram randomizados nos grupos: experimental, com uso do protetor cutâneo em spray, e controle, usando o hidratante Dnativ Revita Derm. Os pacientes foram acompanhados na consulta de enfermagem, com cegamento do avaliador da pele quanto ao uso da intervenção. A escala de avaliação de pele utilizada foi a da Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. A coleta de dados ocorreu por meio dos formulários de avaliação inicial e subsequente, sendo o desfecho principal medido a ocorrência de radiodermatite com descamação úmida, e os secundários a ocorrência de interrupção temporária da radioterapia por radiodermatite, de eventos adversos aos produtos e de severidade da radiodermatite. As análises se deram por Intenção de Tratar e Protocolo, sendo utilizadas as estatísticas descritiva, analítica e inferenciais no tratamento dos dados, com nível de significância de ≤ 0,10. Pesquisa aprovada pelo Comitê de Ética sob parecer nº 5.322.985 e registrado no Clinical Trials sob número: NCT04067310T. A regressão logística binária mostrou que os participantes expostos ao protetor cutâneo em spray tiveram menor chance de apresentar a radiodermatite com descamação úmida quando comparados ao grupo controle. A redução absoluta do risco de radiodermatite foi de 18% no grupo experimental. A incidência geral de radiodermatite foi de 100%, sendo 36,5% graus mais severos. A incidência de radiodermatite Grau 1 foi maior no grupo experimental, enquanto os graus mais severos (Graus 3 e 4) tiveram maior incidência no grupo controle; 17,5% dos participantes tiveram interrupção da radioterapia por radiodermatite, variando de 3 a 15 dias, com média de seis dias interrompidos. Apesar de relevantes clinicamente, esses resultados sobre a interrupção temporária do tratamento e a severidade da radiodermatite não tiveram significância estatística. Foram considerados fatores de risco para a descamação úmida: sexo feminino, diagnóstico C.21 e C.21.8, altas doses de radioterapia (5400-6000cGy), tipo histológico carcinoma espinocelular, umidade antes e durante a radioterapia e uso de proteção íntima. Concluiu-se que o protetor cutâneo em spray é um produto efetivo na prevenção da radiodermatite com descamação úmida nos pacientes com câncer de canal anal e reto, afirmação que sustenta a tese defendida. Nesse sentido, os resultados podem orientar a revisão dos protocolos assistenciais de prevenção da radiodermatite utilizados pelo enfermeiro no âmbito da consulta de enfermagem em radioterapia, com vistas a reduzir os impactos no seguimento terapêutico e na qualidade de vida dos pacientes com câncer de canal anal e reto.

Patients' ongoing anal and rectal cancer radiotherapy exhibit a high prevalence of radiodermatitis with moist desquamation, impairing clinical, economic, and social outcomes. Clinical trials targeting product efficacy in preventing radiodermatitis are lacking in the current literature. These products could contribute to diminishing adverse effects, reducing equipment idle time by therapy interruption, and increasing the cure rate. Our goal is to evaluate the effectiveness of cutaneous spray based on acrylic terpolymers in preventing radiodermatitis with moist desquamation in patients with rectal or anal cancer. Spray effectiveness was defied against a standardized moisturizer in the institution made of Calendula officinalis L. and Aloe barbadensis extracts. An open, single-blind, randomized clinical study was conducted in a single institution, reference in national treatment in oncological diseases, with a sample size (n) of 63 patients. Patients were randomized into two groups: (i) experimental, using cutaneous protector spray; and (ii) control, using moisturizer Dnativ Revita Derm. RTOC's scale was used for evaluating skin condition. Data was collected in forms, which considered: (i) the primary outcome of radiodermatitis with moist desquamation occurrence; and (ii) the secondary outcome of radiotherapy interruption caused by radiodermatitis occurrence and severity, and product adverse effects. Analyses were performed by intention to treat and per protocol, using descriptive, analytical, and inferential statistics, with a significance level of ≤ 0.10 (α). Research was approved by the Ethics committee under approval nº 5.322.985 and registered in Clinical Trials under number NCT04067310T. Binary logistic regression demonstrated that patients exposed to cutaneous spray protector were less prone to develop radiodermatitis with moist desquamation compared to the control group. Absolute reduction in radiodermatitis risk was 18% in the experimental group. The radiodermatitis overall incidence was 100%, with 36.5% of higher severity. The incidence of grade 1 radiodermatitis was higher in the experimental group, while the more severe grades (3 and 4) had a higher incidence in the control group; 17.5% of the participants had an interruption of radiotherapy due to radiodermatitis, ranging from 3 to 15 days, with an average of six interrupted days. Despite being clinically relevant, these results regarding the temporary interruption of treatment and the severity of radiodermatitis were not statistically significant. Risk factors for moist desquamation were considered: female gender, diagnosis of C.21 and C.21.8, high radiation doses (5400 to 6000 cGy), histological type squamous cell carcinoma, humidity before and during radiotherapy, and use of intimate protection. In conclusion, the skin protector spray is an effective product in the prevention of radiodermatitis with moist desquamation in patients with anal and rectal cancer. In this sense, the results can guide the review of care protocols for the prevention of radiodermatitis used by nurses in the context of nursing consultations in radiotherapy to reduce the impacts on therapeutic follow-up and the quality of life of patients with cancer of the anal canal and straight.

Los pacientes con cáncer de canal anal y recto en tratamiento con radioterapia tienen una alta prevalencia de radiodermatitis con descamación húmeda, desenlace que genera impactos clínicos, económicos y sociales. Los estudios sobre la efectividad de los productos en la prevención de la radiodermatitis representan un vacío de conocimiento en el área de oncología y pueden contribuir para la reducción de los impactos negativos, el tiempo de inactividad de los equipos por interrupción del tratamiento y la posibilidad de falla local de la enfermedad. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la eficacia de un protector cutáneo en spray a base de terpolímero acrílico en la prevención de la radiodermatitis con descamación húmeda en pacientes con cáncer anal y rectal frente a una crema hidratante estandarizada de la institución a base de Calendula officinalis L. y Aloe barbadensis. Ensayo clínico aleatorizado, abierto, en una sola institución, referente nacional en el tratamiento de enfermedades oncológicas, con una muestra de 63 pacientes que fueron aleatorizados en grupos: experimental, utilizando spray protector para la piel, y control, utilizando Dnativ Revita Derm hidratante. Los pacientes fueron seguidos en la consulta de enfermería, cegándose el evaluador de piel en cuanto al uso de la intervención. La escala de valoración de la piel utilizada fue la del RTOC. Los datos se recopilaron mediante formularios de evaluación inicial y posterior, siendo el resultado principal medido la aparición de radiodermatitis con descamación húmeda y los resultados secundarios la interrupción temporal de la radioterapia debido a la radiodermatitis, los eventos adversos de los productos y la gravedad de la radiodermatitis. Los análisis fueron realizados por Intención de Tratar y Protocolo, utilizando estadística descriptiva, analítica e inferencial en el procesamiento de datos, con nivel de significación ≤ 0,10. Investigación aprobada por el Comité de Ética con dictamen nº 5.322.985 y registrada en Ensayos Clínicos con el número: NCT04067310T. La regresión logística binaria mostró que los participantes expuestos al protector de piel en aerosol tenían menos probabilidades de tener radiodermatitis con descamación húmeda en comparación con el grupo de control. La reducción absoluta del riesgo de radiodermatitis fue del 18 % en el grupo experimental. La incidencia global de radiodermatitis fue del 100%, siendo el 36,5% grados más graves. La incidencia de radiodermatitis Grado 1 fue mayor en el grupo experimental, mientras que los grados más severos (3 y 4) tuvieron mayor incidencia en el grupo control; El 17,5% de los participantes tuvo interrupción de la radioterapia por radiodermatitis, variando de 3 a 15 días, con un promedio de seis días de interrupción. A pesar de ser clínicamente relevantes, estos resultados en cuanto a la interrupción temporal del tratamiento y la gravedad de la radiodermatitis no fueron estadísticamente significativos. Se consideraron factores de riesgo para descamación húmeda: sexo femenino, diagnóstico C.21 y C.21.8, dosis altas (5400-6000cGy), carcinoma epidermoide de tipo histológico, humedad antes y durante la radioterapia y uso de protección íntima. Se concluyó que el spray protector de piel es un producto eficaz en la prevención de la radiodermatitis con descamación húmeda en pacientes con cáncer anal y rectal, afirmación que sustenta la tesis defendida. En ese sentido, los resultados pueden orientar la revisión de los protocolos de atención para la prevención de la radiodermitis utilizados por los enfermeros en el contexto de las consultas de enfermería en radioterapia, con el objetivo de reducir los impactos en el seguimiento terapéutico y en la calidad de vida de los pacientes con cáncer del canal anal y recto.

Radiodermatitis: severity, predictive factors and discontinuation of radiotherapy in patients with anal and rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: to determine the prevalence of radiodermatitis, severity grades and predictive factors of its occurrence in patients with anal and rectal cancer followed up by the nursing consultation, and to analyze the association of severity grades of radiodermatitis with temporary radiotherapy interruption. METHOD: a quantitative, cross-sectional and retrospective study, carried out with 112 medical records of patients with anal and rectal cancer undergoing curative radiotherapy followed up in the nursing consultation. Data were collected using a form and analyzed using analytical and inferential statistics. RESULTS: 99.1% of patients had radiodermatitis, 34.8% of which were severe. The predictive factors were female sex, age greater than 65 years, anal canal tumor, treatment with cobalt device and IMRT technique. Treatment interruption occurred in 13% of patients, associated with severe radiodermatitis. CONCLUSION: there was a high prevalence of radiodermatitis, mainly severe, which resulted in treatment interruption.

Radiation recall dermatitis after treatment of stage IV breast cancer with nivolumab: a case report.

Radiation recall dermatitis (RRD) is an uncommon dermatologic reaction provoked notably by chemotherapy in an area of skin irradiated weeks to years prior. We report a case of RRD with nivolumab in a woman with breast cancer. The patient was diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast with an isolated spinal metastasis approached in an oligometastatic fashion with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, modified radical mastectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy. Unfortunately, after progression of bony metastases treated with radiotherapy, the patient received nivolumab and subsequently developed a rash corresponding to the adjuvant radiation field. This case highlights the unpredictable nature and characteristic rash of RRD. It is an important differential diagnosis for multidisciplinary teams who also see chemotherapy-induced dermatitis and immune-related adverse events.

Effect of prophylactic cefalexin treatment on the development of bacterial infection in acute radiation-induced dermatitis in dogs: a blinded randomized controlled prospective clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Acute radiation-induced dermatitis (ARID) is a common sequela of radiation therapy and carries the risk of secondary bacterial skin infection. No standard of care exists for managing canine ARID and evidence-based guidelines are lacking; however, prophylactic use of antibiotics is common. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of prophylactic cefalexin on the prevalence and severity of bacterial infection in canine ARID. ANIMALS: Seventeen dogs treated with definitive-intent radiotherapy. METHODS: All dogs were treated with definitive-intent radiation therapy (48-57.5 gray) targeted to the skin surface. Dogs were randomized to receive either prophylactic cefalexin (22 mg/kg twice daily) beginning halfway through the prescribed radiotherapy course (cohort A) or to serve as controls (cohort B). Aerobic skin cultures and surface cytological evaluation were performed at first onset of moist desquamation and one week following completion of radiation therapy. Skin toxicity grading and owner quality of life (QoL) questionnaires were performed weekly. The rate of infection, multidrug resistance status, toxicity severity and QoL between cohorts were compared. RESULTS: Staphylococcus schleiferi and S. pseudintermedius were the most frequent bacterial agents isolated in both cohorts. There was no significant difference in prevalence of bacterial infection or overall QoL between cohorts at either time point; however, multidrug-resistant infections were significantly increased in cohort A versus cohort B. Clinician- and client-perceived severity of toxicity was significantly greater and median duration of moist desquamation was significantly longer in cohort A than cohort B. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Prophylactic use of cefalexin for management of canine ARID is not recommended.

Dermatosis inflamatorias asociadas a radioterapia / Inflammatory skin conditions associated with radiotherapy

La radioterapia es una técnica de uso creciente en el campo de la oncología. Debido al alto recambio celular cutáneo, la radiación ionizante afecta colateralmente a la piel y encontramos de forma frecuente dermatosis inflamatorias asociadas a radioterapia. Algunos de estos cuadros, como la radiodermitis o el fenómeno de recall, son bien conocidos por el dermatólogo. Es importante reconocer otros cuadros cutáneos asociados a radioterapia que aparecen de forma menos frecuente y que en muchas ocasiones son infradiagnosticados

Radiotherapy for cancer is used increasingly. Because skin cells undergo rapid turnover, the ionizing radiation of radiotherapy has collateral effects that are often expressed in inflammatory reactions. Some of these reactions-radiodermatitis and recall phenomenon, for example-are very familiar to dermatologists. Other, less common radiotherapy-associated skin conditions are often underdiagnosed but must also be recognized

Evaluación de la efectividad de un extracto de aceite de rosa mosqueta (ARM) en la prevención de la epitelitis por radioterapia (RT) en pacientes afectos de cáncer de cabeza y cuello (CCC) / Evaluation of the effectiveness of an oil extract of rosehip in the prevention of epithelitis due toradiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer

Introducción. La epitelitis es un efecto secundario frecuente en el tratamiento con radioterapia (RT). Objetivo. Evaluar la efectividad del aceite de rosa mosqueta (ARM, RepavarR) en la prevencion de epitelitis en pacientes con cancer de cabeza y cuello (CCC) tratados con radioterapia de intensidad modulada (IMRT). Material y métodos. Estudio clinico, intervencionista, prospectivo, exploratorio, controlado y abierto. Entre mayo y octubre de 2013 se incluyeron en el estudio 28 pacientes. Tras firmar el consentimiento informado, se les proporciono ARM para aplicarselo 2 veces/dia desde el inicio del tratamiento. Todo tenian prescritas dosis de IMRT ≥ 60 Gy. Enfermeria los evaluo semanalmente. Se realizo un seguimiento fotografico de la piel que registro el grado de epitelitis y la aparicion de dolor u otros. El grupo control lo constituyeron 34 pacientes consecutivos con CCC tratados con IMRT los meses previos al estudio, cuyo tratamiento topico se realizo con otros productos. Resultados. Ambos grupos son comparables (edad, sexo, localización y dosis RT). En el grupo de estudio (ARM) fue menor el numero de curas por paciente (p = 0.3) y los dias naturales de curas por paciente (p = 0.38); tambien fue menor el numero de pacientes que preciso curas y padecio radiodermitis grado III-IV. Probablemente, el limitado tamano muestral haya influido en la significacion estadistica. Conclusiones. La efectividad del ARM en la prevencion de la epitelitis grave en pacientes con CCC tratados con RT es al menos tan eficaz (probablemente mas) que la de los tratamientos topicos habituales. Seria deseable un estudio leatorizado para confirmar dichos hallazgos (AU)

Introduction. Epithelitis is a frequent side effect in radiotherapy treatments (RT). Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of Rosehip Oil (ARM, Repavar) in the prevention of epithelitis in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Material and methods. An interventionist, prospective, exploratory, controlled and open clinical study. Between May and October 2013, 28 patients were included in the study. After signing the informed consent form, the patients were provided with ARM to apply this twice daily from the beginning of the treatment. All of them had a prescribed dose of IMRT ≥ 60 Gy. They were evaluated weekly by nurses on the ward. A photographic monitoring of the skin with a registered grade of epithelitis and with signs of pain or other was carried out. The control group was formed of 34 consecutive patients with HNC treated with IMRT months prior to the study, whose skin treatment had been different products. Results. Both groups were comparable (age, sex, region and RT dose). In the study group (ARM), the number of treatments per patient (p = 0.3) and the natural days for treatment per patient (p = 0.38) were less; also, the number of patients who required treatments and who suffered from radiodermitis of III-IV grade, were less. It is probable that the limited specimen size may have influenced in the statistics. Conclusions. The effectiveness of ARM in the prevention of severe epithelitis in patients with HNC treated with RT is, at least, as effective (or more effective) as other and more common skin treatments. A randomized study would be required to confirm these findings (AU)

Ipilimumab may increase the severity of cutenaous toxicity related to radiotherapy.

Ipilimumab, monoclonal antibody against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 and, radiotherapy are commonly used to treat unresectable and metastatic melanoma. As a result of upregulation of immune system with ipilimumab, many immune-related adverse effects, such as dermatitis, colitis, hepatitis, and hypophysitis, have been previously reported in literature. Typically, these effects are treated with high-dose steroids and mostly heal up. Here, we report a case who was receiving radiotherapy due to metastatic malignant melanoma with atypical generalized rash, which was enlarged with concurrent ipilimumab treatment.

Úlcera cutánea sobre radiodermitis crónica por Vibrio alginolyticus / Cutaneous Ulcer at the Site of Radiation-Induced Dermatitis Caused by Infection With Vibrio alginolyticus

No disponible

A case-control, mono-center, open-label, pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of therapeutic touch in preventing radiation dermatitis in women with breast cancer receiving adjuvant radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic touch (TT) is a non-invasive commonly used complementary therapy. TT is based on the use of hand movements and detection of energy field congestion to correct imbalances. Improvement in subjective symptoms in a variety of clinical trials has been seen with TT. The effect of TT during radiotherapy for breast cancer is unknown. METHODS: Women undergoing adjuvant radiation for Stage I/II breast cancer post conservative surgery were recruited for this cohort study. TT treatments were administered three times per week following radiation therapy. Feasibility was defined as an a priori threshold of 15 of 17 patients completing all TT treatments. The preventive effectiveness of TT was evaluated by documenting the 'time to develop' and the 'worst grade of radiation' dermatitis. Toxicity was assessed using NCIC CTC V3 dermatitis scale. Cosmetic rating was performed using the EORTC Breast Cosmetic Rating. The quality of life, mood and energy, and fatigue were assessed by EORTC QLQ C30, POMS, and BFI, respectively. The parameters were assessed at baseline, and serially during treatment. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients entered the study (17 in the TT Cohort and 32 in the Control Cohort). Median age in TT arm was 63 years and in control arm was 59 years. TT was considered feasible as all 17 patients screened completed TT treatment. There were no side effects observed with the TT treatments. In the TT Cohort, the worst grade of radiation dermatitis was grade II in nine patients (53%). Median time to develop the worst grade was 22 days. In the Control Cohort, the worst grade of radiation dermatitis was grade III in 1 patient. However, the most common toxicity grade was II in 15 patients (47%). Three patients did not develop any dermatitis. Median time to develop the worst grade in the control group was 31 days. There was no difference between cohorts for the overall EORTC cosmetic score and there was no significant difference in before and after study levels in quality of life, mood and fatigue. CONCLUSION: This study is the first evaluation of TT in patients with breast cancer using objective measures. Although TT is feasible for the management of radiation induced dermatitis, we were not able to detect a significant benefit of TT on NCIC toxicity grade or time to develop the worst grade for radiation dermatitis. In addition, TT did not improve quality of life, mood, fatigue and overall cosmetic outcome.

Prospective evaluation of severe skin toxicity and pain during postmastectomy radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To prospectively capture acute toxicities and pain associated with postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT), to analyze patient and treatment risk factors for severe side effects. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Women referred for PMRT were prospectively enrolled and assessed weekly during and after radiation therapy. The endpoint included severe National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects grade 3 moist desquamation, other skin symptoms, and pain. RESULTS: Of 257 patients, 73 (28.4%) experienced extensive moist desquamation, 84 (32.7%) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects skin toxicity grade 3, and 57 (22.2%) a pain impacting on daily life activities. Among symptoms only grade 3 moist desquamation was significantly associated with severe pain (P<.001). On multivariate analysis, smoking, high-energy photons, and skin bolus were significantly associated with severe moist desquamation. Skin toxicity doubled for smokers, with 40% severe pain, 48% grade 3 moist desquamation, and 64% grade 3 skin toxicity. Without skin bolus 4.2% had severe pain, none moist desquamation, and 2.1% grade 3 skin toxicity. When skin bolus was used on alternate days, the frequency increased to 15% for pain, 22% for moist desquamation, and 26% for grade 3 skin toxicity. When bolus was used daily, 32% had pain, 41% moist desquamation, and 47% grade 3 skin toxicity. Symptoms peaked 1 to 2 weeks after the end of PMRT. CONCLUSIONS: The present cohort study suggests excessive radiation toxicity after PMRT. Among factors associated with an increase of toxicity are smoking habits and the use of skin bolus.

Case of Merkel cell carcinoma with squamous cell carcinoma possibly arising in chronic radiodermatitis of the hand.

We report a case of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) on the dorsal aspect of the right middle finger associated with multiple squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) possibly arising in chronic radiation dermatitis of the hand of an 80-year-old surgeon. In spite of resection of the primary lesion and right axillary lymph nodes, he died of the tumor 5 months after the first visit. Cutaneous and lymph node lesions of MCC were negative for Merkel cell polyoma virus (MCPyV) by immunostaining using monoclonal antibody (CM2B4) and anti-large T antigen of MCPyV polyclonal antibody, and real-time polymerase chain reaction. Several differences in clinicopathological findings have been found between MCPyV-positive cases and negative ones. Several authors have reported that MCPyV-negative cases have a worse prognosis than MCPyV-positive ones. Furthermore, in cases of MCC associated with SCC, most tumors have been reported to be MCPyV-negative. We should pay more attention to the relationship between the carcinogenesis of MCC and ionizing irradiation.

Looking for complementary alternatives to CTCAE for skin toxicity in radiotherapy: quantitative determinations

INTRODUCTION: Radiotherapy (RT) is an essential part of the patient's treatment diagnosed with cancer. Determination of the most common RT secondary effect, the cutaneous toxicity, is usually based on visual rating scales, like Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events with an inherent subjectivity. The aim of this work is to perform an objective method to evaluate the radiodermatitis using a non-invasive imaging technique based on laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was performed analysing 1,824 measurements. A LDF was used to measure the cutaneous microcirculation in real time. A basal measurement was taken prior to radiotherapy treatment. To be able to observe the microcirculation changes related to the delivered dose, several sets of measurements were taken in the irradiated area along the RT treatment and in the contralateral non-irradiated area. RESULTS: A relative increase in blood flow at all measured points was found in the irradiated area. This relative increase in blood flow increases with the dose administered. In the non-irradiated contralateral area, the relative increase in blood flow is not significant and is independent of the dose administered. After treatment, a decrease in blood flow was detected with a trend towards returning to the baseline measurements. CONCLUSIONS: LDF is an objective technique that assesses early radiodermatitis. This method is useful to develop strategies to prevent onset of radiation dermatitis in patients irradiated, such as the modification and individualization of fractionation parameters of the RT. This allows the reduction of radiation morbidities and maintains patient quality of life (AU)

No disponible

Topical morphine gel for pain management in head and neck cancer patients.

Pain is common in head and neck cancer patients. Regardless of the cause, pain management is essential in supportive care. Recent research has suggested that opioid receptors on peripheral nerve terminals may play an important role in pain modulation. A number of publications have reported the use of topical morphine for painful ulcers that occur because of a variety of medical conditions. To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports in the literature regarding the use of morphine gel in head and neck cancer patients. We present two cases treated with morphine gel therapy for cutaneous pain resulting from radiation-induced dermatitis and tumor infiltration. We obtained good pain control in both cases without side effects. In one case, the use of the gel allowed a decrease in systemic opioid medication, and adverse effects of systemic opioid administration were resolved. Our experience suggests that this treatment presents great potential for selected head and neck cancer patients, especially those with prominent pain limited to the body surface.

External jugular vein cross-over as a new technique for percutaneous central venous port access in case of left central venous occlusion.

PURPOSE: To report the cross-over venous catheter technique in case of left-sided central venous (internal jugular, subclavian and innominate veins) occlusion and right-sided central vein patency. METHODS: A 60-year-old right breast cancer patient presented with a local recurrence requiring chemotherapy. He presented with a left-sided catheter-related central venous occlusion and radiodermatitis of the right chest and neck. The nonsymptomatic side of insertion was defined as the patient's left side. Successful percutaneous left-to-right external jugular vein (EJV) cross-over access tips and tricks are reported. They include performing (a) the EJV access at the lower neck, (b) the 0.032 hydrophilic guidewire (GW) catheterization of the venous curves, (c) the GW anchor technique into the inferior vena cava, (d) the GW + Glidecath catheter stiffening technique and (e) the over-the-stiff wire implantable catheter push. RESULTS: The cross-over technique was successful by using real-time ultrasonography/X-ray monitoring and interventional radiology tools (hydrophilic 0.032 in. and stiff 0.0035 in. GW and "J-shaped" Glidecath catheter) and the five-step technique. CONCLUSIONS: In case of left innominate vein occlusion and necessity of left neck venous access, percutaneous EJV access should be attempted under real-time ultrasound/X-ray monitoring when other standard (subclavian venous port and internal jugular vein) routes are no longer available.

[Quality of life in individuals exposed to cesium-137 in Goiânia, Goiás State, Brazil]. / Qualidade de vida dos indivíduos expostos ao césio-137, em Goiânia, Goiás, Brasil.

This cross-sectional observational study in Goiânia, Goiás State, Brazil in a sample of 56% of 111 individuals exposed to cesium-137 aimed to evaluate their quality of life and associations with socio-demographic factors. The study used the WHOQOL-BREF and the Monitoring System for Radiation Victims. Participants were divided according to international criteria: Group I - radiation dermatitis and / or cytogenetic dosimetry above 20 rads (n = 33) and Group II - cytogenetic dosimetry ≤ 20 rads (n = 29), totaling 62 subjects. Among the WHOQOL-BREF domains, environment showed the highest mean scores (59.88, SD = 20.39) and psychological the lowest (53.02, SD = 17.98). Associations between the physical, psychological, and social domains were significant for the age variable. There was no difference between groups. The association between socio-demographic factors and quality of life was not significant. Radiation victims suffer considerable impact on quality of life, with persistent psychosocial problems, especially among those older than 41 years.