Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 161
Filtrar
1.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 3: CD014545, 2021 03 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33720395

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The detection and diagnosis of caries at the earliest opportunity is fundamental to the preservation of tooth tissue and maintenance of oral health. Radiographs have traditionally been used to supplement the conventional visual-tactile clinical examination. Accurate, timely detection and diagnosis of early signs of disease could afford patients the opportunity of less invasive treatment with less destruction of tooth tissue, reduce the need for treatment with aerosol-generating procedures, and potentially result in a reduced cost of care to the patient and to healthcare services. OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of different dental imaging methods to inform the detection and diagnosis of non-cavitated enamel only coronal dental caries. SEARCH METHODS: Cochrane Oral Health's Information Specialist undertook a search of the following databases: MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 31 December 2018); Embase Ovid (1980 to 31 December 2018); US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register (ClinicalTrials.gov, to 31 December 2018); and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (to 31 December 2018). We studied reference lists as well as published systematic review articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included diagnostic accuracy study designs that compared a dental imaging method with a reference standard (histology, excavation, enhanced visual examination), studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of single index tests, and studies that directly compared two or more index tests. Studies reporting at both the patient or tooth surface level were included. In vitro and in vivo studies were eligible for inclusion. Studies that explicitly recruited participants with more advanced lesions that were obviously into dentine or frankly cavitated were excluded. We also excluded studies that artificially created carious lesions and those that used an index test during the excavation of dental caries to ascertain the optimum depth of excavation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors extracted data independently and in duplicate using a standardised data extraction form and quality assessment based on QUADAS-2 specific to the clinical context. Estimates of diagnostic accuracy were determined using the bivariate hierarchical method to produce summary points of sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence regions. Comparative accuracy of different radiograph methods was conducted based on indirect and direct comparisons between methods. Potential sources of heterogeneity were pre-specified and explored visually and more formally through meta-regression. MAIN RESULTS: We included 104 datasets from 77 studies reporting a total of 15,518 tooth sites or surfaces. The most frequently reported imaging methods were analogue radiographs (55 datasets from 51 studies) and digital radiographs (42 datasets from 40 studies) followed by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) (7 datasets from 7 studies). Only 17 studies were of an in vivo study design, carried out in a clinical setting. No studies were considered to be at low risk of bias across all four domains but 16 studies were judged to have low concern for applicability across all domains. The patient selection domain had the largest number of studies judged to be at high risk of bias (43 studies); the index test, reference standard, and flow and timing domains were judged to be at high risk of bias in 30, 12, and 7 studies respectively. Studies were synthesised using a hierarchical bivariate method for meta-analysis. There was substantial variability in the results of the individual studies, with sensitivities that ranged from 0 to 0.96 and specificities from 0 to 1.00. For all imaging methods the estimated summary sensitivity and specificity point was 0.47 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40 to 0.53) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.92), respectively. In a cohort of 1000 tooth surfaces with a prevalence of enamel caries of 63%, this would result in 337 tooth surfaces being classified as disease free when enamel caries was truly present (false negatives), and 43 tooth surfaces being classified as diseased in the absence of enamel caries (false positives). Meta-regression indicated that measures of accuracy differed according to the imaging method (Chi2(4) = 32.44, P < 0.001), with the highest sensitivity observed for CBCT, and the highest specificity observed for analogue radiographs. None of the specified potential sources of heterogeneity were able to explain the variability in results. No studies included restored teeth in their sample or reported the inclusion of sealants. We rated the certainty of the evidence as low for sensitivity and specificity and downgraded two levels in total for risk of bias due to limitations in the design and conduct of the included studies, indirectness arising from the in vitro studies, and the observed inconsistency of the results. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The design and conduct of studies to determine the diagnostic accuracy of methods to detect and diagnose caries in situ are particularly challenging. Low-certainty evidence suggests that imaging for the detection or diagnosis of early caries may have poor sensitivity but acceptable specificity, resulting in a relatively high number of false-negative results with the potential for early disease to progress. If left untreated, the opportunity to provide professional or self-care practices to arrest or reverse early caries lesions will be missed. The specificity of lesion detection is however relatively high, and one could argue that initiation of non-invasive management (such as the use of topical fluoride), is probably of low risk. CBCT showed superior sensitivity to analogue or digital radiographs but has very limited applicability to the general dental practitioner. However, given the high-radiation dose, and potential for caries-like artefacts from existing restorations, its use cannot be justified in routine caries detection. Nonetheless, if early incidental carious lesions are detected in CBCT scans taken for other purposes, these should be reported. CBCT has the potential to be used as a reference standard in diagnostic studies of this type. Despite the robust methodology applied in this comprehensive review, the results should be interpreted with some caution due to shortcomings in the design and execution of many of the included studies. Future research should evaluate the comparative accuracy of different methods, be undertaken in a clinical setting, and focus on minimising bias arising from the use of imperfect reference standards in clinical studies.


Asunto(s)
Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto , Caries Dental/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Dental/métodos , Adulto , Sesgo , Niño , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/estadística & datos numéricos , Dentición Permanente , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Humanos , Radiografía Dental/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Dental Digital/estadística & datos numéricos , Estándares de Referencia , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Diente Primario
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 185(4): 452-455, 2019 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30916773

RESUMEN

Data from dental intraoral radiography quality controls was gathered from 1201 units (22% of the licensed X-ray units existing in Portugal), using film and digital image systems, between 2016 and 2018. The median incident air KERMA for standard superior molar tooth was evaluated in 0.9 mGy with the value of 1.3 mGy as the upper quartile. Comparisons with a 1990 published survey from dental exposures in Portugal were made. A 85% reduction for incident air KERMA per exposure was observed (6.0 mGy for the 1990 survey), which can be attributed to technical advances in the X-ray image receptors, as well as the implementation of legal requirements for technical acceptability of radiological units. It was also observed an increase of X-ray exams, which is related to an increase of dental practitioners, available radiological equipment and the level of dental healthcare.


Asunto(s)
Dosis de Radiación , Radiografía Dental Digital/métodos , Radiografía Dental/métodos , Radiometría , Pantallas Intensificadoras de Rayos X , Humanos , Portugal , Control de Calidad , Radiografía Dental/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Dental Digital/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Rayos X
3.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 69(2): 205-210, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30804585

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and reasons of digital radiography and cone-beam computed tomography usage among paediatric dental practitioners, and to assess their knowledge and need for specific education.. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was conducted from January to July 2017 and comprised paediatric dentists present at the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry Interim Seminar in Turin, Italy, and members of the Turkish Society of Paediatric Dentistry who did not attend the event. Data about sociodemographics and their attitude towards, use of, and knowledge of digital radiography and cone beam computed tomography was collected by means of a 20-item questionnaire that was mailed to all the subjects. SPSS 22 was used to evaluate data. RESULTS: Of the 435 questionnaires distributed, 245(56%) were returned, while 194 (45%) were deemed usable. The mean age of the responding paediatric dentists was 35.84±9.10 (range: 24-67 years) and 126(64.9%) were female. Users of digital radiography identified its advantages, such as lower radiation dose 166(85.7%), ease of image storage 150(77.3%), and the possibility to change image settings and to carry out measurements 106(54.5%). Overall, 70(36%) paediatric dentists had no knowledge of cone beam computed tomography. Dental trauma was cited as the reason for using cone beam computed tomography by 70(61.3%) subjects, dental development issues by 138(71%) and pathology in the jaws by 147(75.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Digital radiography and cone beam computed tomography users are increasing in the world.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Competencia Clínica , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Odontólogos , Radiografía Dental Digital , Adulto , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Odontólogos/educación , Odontólogos/normas , Odontólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Necesidades , Utilización de Procedimientos y Técnicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Dental Digital/métodos , Radiografía Dental Digital/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Turquía/epidemiología
4.
J Vet Dent ; 34(4): 248-258, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28974160

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare root and root canal width measurements between digital intraoral radiography (IOR) and micro-computed tomography (µCT). The accuracy of IOR measurements of canine mandibular molars was scrutinized to assess feasibility of developing a model to estimate animal age based on dentinal thickness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine canine mandibular first molars were imaged using µCT and IOR. For each tooth, the root and root canal width of the mesial and distal roots were measured by a single observer at 3 marked sites on µCT and IOR. Two different software programs were used to measure the radiographs. The radiograph measurements were compared to each other and to the µCT measurements. The µCT images were considered the anatomic reference standard for structural representation. RESULTS: The data collected demonstrated IOR bias and variability throughout all measurement sites, with some sites being more affected than others. Neither IOR system produced unbiased measurements that closely reflected the µCT measurements consistently. The overall lack of agreement between measurements demonstrated the difficulties in developing a standardized protocol for measuring root and root canal width for the first molar teeth in dogs. CONCLUSION: Developing a protocol to accurately measure and compare µCT and IOR measurements is challenging. Designing a measurement system that would allow for universal application to age dogs would require continued research utilizing a standardized approach to overcome the limitations identified in this article.


Asunto(s)
Determinación de la Edad por los Dientes/veterinaria , Cavidad Pulpar/diagnóstico por imagen , Perros , Diente Molar/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Dental Digital/veterinaria , Raíz del Diente/diagnóstico por imagen , Microtomografía por Rayos X/veterinaria , Determinación de la Edad por los Dientes/métodos , Animales , Dentina/diagnóstico por imagen , Mandíbula/diagnóstico por imagen , Modelos Teóricos , Radiografía Dental Digital/métodos , Radiografía Dental Digital/estadística & datos numéricos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Microtomografía por Rayos X/métodos , Microtomografía por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
J Dent ; 67: 77-83, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28993243

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the factors derived from the 405nm laser-induced autofluorescence (AF) spectra that could be used to diagnose and stage caries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Teeth (20 teeth per stage) were classified as sound, stage II, III, and IV based on a visual and tactile inspection. The specimens were re-examined and reclassified based on micro-CT analysis. From the teeth, the AF was obtained using a 405nm laser. Three spectral factors (spectral slope at 550-600nm, area under the curve at 500-590nm, and two-peak ratio between 625 and 667nm) were derived from the AF spectra. Using these factors, the diagnosis and staging of caries were tested, and the results were compared with those of DIAGNOdent. RESULTS: After micro-CT analysis, only 13, 11, and 13 teeth were reclassified as stages II, III, and IV, respectively. The reclassified groups showed less data overlap between the stages, and the spectral slope was 40.1-74.6, 27.5-39.6, 11.1-27.4, and 1.0-9.7 for sound, stage II, III, and IV, respectively. The differentiation of stages III and IV using DIAGNOdent appeared to be difficult due to the considerable data overlap. CONCLUSION: Among the factors tested, the spectral slope at 550-600nm showed the best match with the caries specimens, in which their stage had been identified precisely. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The 405nm laser-induced AF spectra can be applied to the diagnosis and staging of caries alone or in conjunction with conventional methods, such as visual, tactile, and X-ray inspection.


Asunto(s)
Caries Dental/diagnóstico , Técnicas y Procedimientos Diagnósticos , Rayos Láser , Espectrometría de Fluorescencia/métodos , Caries Dental/diagnóstico por imagen , Caries Dental/patología , Esmalte Dental/diagnóstico por imagen , Esmalte Dental/patología , Instrumentos Dentales , Dentina/diagnóstico por imagen , Dentina/patología , Técnicas y Procedimientos Diagnósticos/instrumentación , Fluorescencia , Humanos , Radiografía Dental Digital/estadística & datos numéricos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Espectroscopía Infrarroja por Transformada de Fourier/métodos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Diente/diagnóstico por imagen , Diente/patología , Desmineralización Dental/diagnóstico , Microtomografía por Rayos X
6.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 45(6): 20160043, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27268417

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Given the limitations of panoramic radiography for assessing topographic relationship of maxillary teeth with sinus floor, the purpose of this study was to assess signs on panoramic radiography that could predict root protrusion into the sinus. METHODS: A total of 46 individuals (330 maxillary posterior teeth) who underwent panoramic radiography and CBCT were enrolled. The relationship between the posterior teeth and the maxillary sinus and panoramic radiography signs (projection of the root apices, interruption of the maxillary sinus floor, lamina dura, darkening in the root apices, and superiorly curving sinus floor enveloping the associated tooth root) associated with protrusion of root apices into the sinus were evaluated. RESULTS: There were differences between the imaging modalities about the positioning of the root apices regarding the sinus (p < 0.05). Only the projecting of the root apices and the interruption of the sinus floor on panoramic radiography were predictors for the root protrusion (p < 0.05). No significant association was observed for the other panoramic radiography signs (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The root projection into the sinus and the interruption of the sinus floor are indicative signs of root protrusion into the sinus on CBCT.


Asunto(s)
Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/estadística & datos numéricos , Seno Maxilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Panorámica/estadística & datos numéricos , Ápice del Diente/diagnóstico por imagen , Diente Premolar/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Diente Molar/diagnóstico por imagen , Tercer Molar/diagnóstico por imagen , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Radiografía Dental Digital/estadística & datos numéricos , Raíz del Diente/diagnóstico por imagen
7.
J Clin Pediatr Dent ; 40(2): 103-6, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26950809

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to determine if the prevalence of pre-eruptive intracoronal radiolucent defects is higher for young age groups, in which there are more unerupted teeth. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of panoramic and bitewing radiographs was conducted. An inclusion criterion was the presence of un-erupted permanent teeth with a formed and clearly visible crown. Age groups were: young (6-8 years), intermediate (9-12 years) and adults (13-53 years). Significance level was set at p≤0.05. RESULTS: Thirteen (3.9%) pre-eruptive lesions were detected in 335 records. No lesions were found in the young group (7.4%), in the intermediate and adult age groups six and seven lesions were found, respectively. In most cases the pre-eruptive lesion was found in a third molar. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of pre-eruptive intracoronal lesions was not higher for young age groups. The prevalence of pre-eruptive intra coronal radiolucent lesions is 3.9%, irrespective of age.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Dentales/epidemiología , Diente no Erupcionado/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anodoncia/epidemiología , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Israel/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tercer Molar/diagnóstico por imagen , Tercer Molar/patología , Prevalencia , Radiografía de Mordida Lateral/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Dental Digital/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Panorámica/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades Dentales/diagnóstico por imagen , Diente no Erupcionado/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto Joven
8.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 45(4): 20150226, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26943178

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess radiographic methods and diagnostically sufficient images used before removal of mandibular third molars among randomly selected general dental clinics. Furthermore, to assess factors predisposing for an additional radiographic examination. METHODS: 2 observers visited 18 randomly selected clinics in Denmark and studied patient files, including radiographs of patients who had their mandibular third molar(s) removed. The radiographic unit and type of receptor were registered. A diagnostically sufficient image was defined as the whole tooth and mandibular canal were displayed in the radiograph (yes/no). Overprojection between the tooth and mandibular canal (yes/no) and patient-reported inferior alveolar nerve sensory disturbances (yes/no) were recorded. Regression analyses tested if overprojection between the third molar and the mandibular canal and an insufficient intraoral image predisposed for additional radiographic examination(s). RESULTS: 1500 mandibular third molars had been removed; 1090 had intraoral, 468 had panoramic and 67 had CBCT examination. 1000 teeth were removed after an intraoral examination alone, 433 after panoramic examination and 67 after CBCT examination. 90 teeth had an additional examination after intraoral. Overprojection between the tooth and mandibular canal was a significant factor (p < 0.001, odds ratio = 3.56) for an additional examination. 63.7% of the intraoral images were sufficient and 36.3% were insufficient, with no significant difference between images performed with phosphor plates and solid-state sensors (p = 0.6). An insufficient image predisposed for an additional examination (p = 0.008, odds ratio = 1.8) but was only performed in 11% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Most mandibular third molars were removed based on an intraoral examination although 36.3% were insufficient.


Asunto(s)
Mandíbula/diagnóstico por imagen , Tercer Molar/diagnóstico por imagen , Extracción Dental , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/estadística & datos numéricos , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Clínicas Odontológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Odontología General/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Mandíbula/cirugía , Nervio Mandibular/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tercer Molar/cirugía , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica/métodos , Radiografía de Mordida Lateral/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Dental Digital/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Panorámica/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Extracción Dental/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos del Nervio Trigémino/epidemiología , Pantallas Intensificadoras de Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
9.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 45(4): 20150326, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26892946

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of digital intraoral and extraoral bitewing (EO BW) radiography in the detection of enamel proximal caries regardless of their ability to separate contacts. METHODS: Artificial caries with different degrees of decalcification was induced in 80 human sound premolars and molars using formic acid. Intraoral radiographs were taken with photostimulable phosphor plate (PSP) and complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS), using the paralleling bitewing technique. Extraoral bitewing radiographs were obtained using Sirona digital panoramic X-ray unit (Sirona Siemens, Bensheim, Germany). In total, 160 proximal surfaces were assessed by 2 observers twice. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) values for each image type, observer and reading were compared using z-tests, with a significance level of p ≤ 0.05. Sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value and negative-predictive value for each observer and reading were calculated. RESULTS: Spearman's test showed a strong positive correlation between the duration of demineralization and histological grading of carious teeth surfaces. For the three radiographic techniques, intraobserver reliability was strong to excellent. Moreover, interobserver agreement was strong. The differences between all detection methods were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Intraoral bitewing using CMOS sensor had the highest sensitivity while EO BW had the highest specificity in the detection of incipient proximal caries. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of the ex vivo design, the difference in diagnostic accuracy between the three radiographic techniques was not significant. EO BW could be used in the detection of enamel proximal caries with results comparable with intraoral bitewing with PSP plate and CMOS sensor.


Asunto(s)
Caries Dental/diagnóstico por imagen , Esmalte Dental/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía de Mordida Lateral/estadística & datos numéricos , Área Bajo la Curva , Diente Premolar/diagnóstico por imagen , Diente Premolar/patología , Caries Dental/patología , Esmalte Dental/patología , Humanos , Diente Molar/diagnóstico por imagen , Diente Molar/patología , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Curva ROC , Radiografía de Mordida Lateral/instrumentación , Radiografía Dental Digital/instrumentación , Radiografía Dental Digital/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Panorámica/instrumentación , Radiografía Panorámica/estadística & datos numéricos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Desmineralización Dental/diagnóstico por imagen , Desmineralización Dental/patología , Pantallas Intensificadoras de Rayos X
10.
Acta Odontol Scand ; 74(4): 272-8, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26634313

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority in Finland has paid attention to the large numbers of dental panoramic tomographs (DPTs), particularly in 7-12-year-old children. The majority of these radiographs are taken for orthodontic reasons. Because of the high radiosensitivity of children, the size of the irradiated field should be carefully chosen to yield the necessary diagnostic information at the lowest possible dose. The purpose of the present study was, therefore, to assess the outcome of DPTs within this age group in terms of type and location of pathological findings. It was also hypothesized that DPTs of orthodontic patients rarely display unrestored caries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred and forty-one DPTs, taken of 7-12-year-old children in 2010-2014, were randomly sampled. The 413 of them (94%) that had been taken for orthodontic reasons were analysed. RESULTS: All pathologic findings were restricted to the tooth-bearing area and there was no pathology in the bone structure or any incidental findings in the region of temporomandibular joint. Unlike hypothesized, 27% of the orthodontic DPTs showed caries in deciduous teeth and 16% in permanent teeth. A sub-sample of 229 DPTs, analysed for developmental dental and occlusal problems, most commonly displayed crowding (50%), positional anomalies and local problems with tooth eruption (32%), as well as hyperodontia (15%). CONCLUSION: Inclusion of only the actual area of interest in the image field should be considered case-specifically as a means to reduce the radiation dose.


Asunto(s)
Maloclusión/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Panorámica/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Dentales/diagnóstico por imagen , Anodoncia/diagnóstico por imagen , Niño , Caries Dental/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Finlandia , Humanos , Masculino , Cóndilo Mandibular/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Periapicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Dosis de Radiación , Radiografía Dental Digital/estadística & datos numéricos , Anomalías Dentarias/diagnóstico por imagen , Erupción Dental , Erupción Ectópica de Dientes/diagnóstico por imagen , Diente Primario/diagnóstico por imagen , Diente Supernumerario/diagnóstico por imagen
11.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 45(3): 20150281, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26670605

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Proximal dental caries remains a prevalent disease with only modest detection rates by current diagnostic systems. Many new systems are available without controlled validation of diagnostic efficacy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of three potentially promising new imaging systems. METHODS: This study evaluated the caries detection efficacy of Schick 33 (Sirona Dental, Salzburg, Austria) intraoral digital detector images employing an advanced sharpening filter, Planmeca ProMax(®) (Planmeca Inc., Helsinki, Finland) extraoral "panoramic bitewing" images and Sirona Orthophos XG3D (Sirona Dental) CBCT images with advanced artefact reduction. Conventional photostimulable phosphor images served as the control modality. An ex vivo study design using extracted human teeth, ten expert observers and micro-CT ground truth was employed. RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated similar diagnostic efficacy of all systems (ANOVA p > 0.05). The sensitivity of the Schick 33 images (0.48) was significantly lower than the other modalities (0.53-0.62). The specificity of the Planmeca images (0.86) was significantly lower than Schick 33 (0.96) and XG3D (0.97). The XG3D showed significantly better cavitation detection sensitivity (0.62) than the other modalities (0.48-0.57). CONCLUSIONS: The Schick 33 images demonstrated reduced caries sensitivity, whereas the Planmeca panoramic bitewing images demonstrated reduced specificity. XG3D with artefact reduction demonstrated elevated sensitivity and specificity for caries detection, improved depth accuracy and substantially improved cavitation detection. Care must be taken to recognize potential false-positive caries lesions with Planmeca panoramic bitewing images. Use of CBCT for caries detection must be carefully balanced with the presence of metal artefacts, time commitment, financial cost and radiation dose.


Asunto(s)
Caries Dental/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagenología Tridimensional/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Dental/estadística & datos numéricos , Artefactos , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Ensayo de Materiales , Curva ROC , Radiografía de Mordida Lateral/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Dental Digital/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Panorámica/estadística & datos numéricos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tecnología Odontológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Tecnología Radiológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Pantallas Intensificadoras de Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Microtomografía por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos
12.
Eur J Orthod ; 38(2): 184-9, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25888531

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Cephalometric inclination change of the lower incisors during orthodontics is used to assess treatment outcome. The lower border of the mandible is commonly used for measuring inclination change, despite it being subject to remodelling in growing patients. Superimposition of radiographs using Björk's 'stable structures' is intended to exclude these growth changes. We tested whether there is a significant difference for three commonly used methods to assess inclination change induced by orthodontic treatment (Me-Go, Go-Gn, the tangent to the lower border of the mandible) when comparing it to Björk's 'stable structures'. METHODS: Björk's superimposition does not allow measuring incisor inclination changes directly; hence, one pre- and mid-treatment cephalogram of 39 growing orthodontic patients were superimposed in this retrospective study. The radiographs were taken at least 1 year apart (120 weeks; SD = 34.4). Patients undergoing growth modification treatment were excluded. Standardized cephalograms were hand traced and changes in lower incisor inclination, using the three mandibular planes, were compared to the changes obtained by anatomical superimposition of Björk's 'stable structures'. RESULTS: Linear regression showed good intra-class correlation (ICC) between all methods. ICC was 0.96 for Me-Go, 0.94 for Go-Gn, and 0.92 for the lower border tangent. ICC for operator reliability was 0.99. LIMITATIONS: Measurement errors affect all investigations of both analogue and digital radiographs, but movement artefacts particularly apply to the latter. Cephalometry uses two-dimensional measurements of a three-dimensional subject, which can lead to further inaccuracies. These limitations have to be taken into account when interpreting the results of our investigation. CONCLUSION: Data obtained from Björk's superimposition did not vary significantly from the other more commonly used techniques (Me-Go, Go-Gn, and the tangent to the lower border of the mandible). Remodelling of the lower border of the mandible was insignificant for the time period investigated.


Asunto(s)
Cefalometría/métodos , Incisivo/patología , Mandíbula/patología , Adolescente , Artefactos , Cefalometría/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Mentón/diagnóstico por imagen , Mentón/patología , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/estadística & datos numéricos , Incisivo/diagnóstico por imagen , Mandíbula/diagnóstico por imagen , Ortodoncia Correctiva/instrumentación , Radiografía Dental Digital/métodos , Radiografía Dental Digital/estadística & datos numéricos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
J Dent Hyg ; 89(6): 384-9, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26684996

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Technological advances in intra-oral receptors have resulted in film-holding devices that may or may not be interchangeable with photostimulable phosphor receptors. This study evaluated the number and types of technique errors that occurred when using PSP receptors with a standard film-holding device and a dual PSP/film-designed device. METHODS: The Rinn XCP-ORA® (Standard) and the Rinn Flip-Ray® PA device (Test) were compared using rectangular collimation. DenOptix® imaging plates (sizes 1 and 2) were used as receptors. Fourteen periapical (10-size 2 and 4-size 1) projections were exposed per full mouth series on each Dental X-ray Teaching and Training Replica with both devices. Five Dental X-ray Teaching and Training Replicas were exposed by 3 experienced radiographers. Data were analyzed using a paired t-test to determine differences in the performance scores between the 2 devices. Technique errors (receptor placement, vertical angulation, horizontal angulation and cone centering) were reported using frequencies. An experienced evaluator critiqued each projection. RESULTS: A total of 15 full mouth series (210 projections) were taken per device. The mean performance scores per device were 88.4 (standard device) and 88.1 (test device) and were not statistically different (p=0.88). Cone centering errors were the most common error observed in both the standard (36%) and test (43%) devices. Receptor placement errors occurred when using the standard (12%) and test (9%) devices. Vertical and horizontal errors were <2% for both devices. CONCLUSION: Devices designed for use with film may be used interchangeably with photostimulable phosphor receptors. Some difference was noticed between devices regarding error type and occurrence.


Asunto(s)
Radiografía Dental Digital/instrumentación , Artefactos , Diseño de Equipo/instrumentación , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica , Radiografía Dental Digital/métodos , Radiografía Dental Digital/estadística & datos numéricos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Técnica de Sustracción/instrumentación , Diente/diagnóstico por imagen , Película para Rayos X , Rayos X
14.
BMC Oral Health ; 15: 107, 2015 Sep 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26350934

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The reproducibility of measurements on radiographs is influenced by the techniques by which the images as well as the measurements are obtained. Thus, bias resulting from errors in the image and/or image examinations at two points in time may result in wrongful registrations of true biological or pathological changes. The aim of the present study was to propose and evaluate an indirect radiological examination technique, by which bias, when measuring radiographic bone level, could be substantially reduced as compared to the technique using direct mm measurements. METHODS: A plugin to ImageJ was designed to reduce bias when measuring bone loss on radiographic images. In human dry mandibles, radiographic images of 20 teeth were obtained parallel with the tooth axis (alpha = 0) and at an angle of 30° deviation. The direct technique of measuring radiographic bone level (RBL) and the indirect, length-adjusted RBL were registered by four researchers in a double blinded fashion. RESULTS: When mean RBL measured at 0° angle was 7.0 mm, the corresponding mean RBL measured at 30° angle was 7.8 mm, signifying an 11.4% increase (p = 0.032), whereas the mean length-adjusted RBL increased by 0.6% (p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the use of the original, direct technique (ImageJ) resulted in markedly biased radiographic bone level at 30° angle, while the proposed indirect length-adjusted technique (ImageJ plugin) did not.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar/diagnóstico por imagen , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Radiografía Dental Digital/métodos , Proceso Alveolar/diagnóstico por imagen , Sesgo , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Longitudinales , Mandíbula/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Dental Digital/estadística & datos numéricos , Ápice del Diente/diagnóstico por imagen , Cuello del Diente/diagnóstico por imagen , Corona del Diente/diagnóstico por imagen
15.
Pediatr Dent ; 37(4): E14-22, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26314593

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical and laboratory performances of an electronic caries monitor (ECM-IV) and the DIAGNOdent device with that of conventional methods, including visual (VE) and radiographic examinations (RE), for the detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth. METHODS: Three different observers examined 200 primary molars before extraction (in vivo), immediately after extraction (in vitro 1), and 14 days after extraction (in vitro 2). Examinations were performed visually, radiographically using the DIAGNOdent and ECM-IV devices. RESULTS: Among all the methods, the ECM-IV yielded the highest sensitivity and Az (Area under the ROC curve) values at the enamel (D1) threshold and visual examination for dentin (D3) threshold. For reproducibility, the ECM-IV presented the highest Kappa values at the D1 threshold, and the DIAGNOdent presented the highest Kappa values at the D3 threshold. Both devices presented high intraclass correlation coefficient values, although DIAGNOdent showed higher values than ECM-IV in all stages of the study and for all observers. CONCLUSION: Considering the importance of early identification of caries in primary teeth, the use of the ECM and DIAGNOdent devices, together with conventional examination methods, will increase the rate of identification of occlusal caries during routine clinic visits.


Asunto(s)
Caries Dental/diagnóstico , Equipos y Suministros Eléctricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Rayos Láser , Corona del Diente/patología , Diente Primario/patología , Área Bajo la Curva , Caries Dental/diagnóstico por imagen , Esmalte Dental/diagnóstico por imagen , Esmalte Dental/patología , Pulpa Dental/diagnóstico por imagen , Pulpa Dental/patología , Dentina/diagnóstico por imagen , Dentina/patología , Diagnóstico Precoz , Conductividad Eléctrica , Fluorescencia , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Examen Físico , Curva ROC , Radiografía Dental Digital/estadística & datos numéricos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Corona del Diente/diagnóstico por imagen , Diente Primario/diagnóstico por imagen
16.
BMC Oral Health ; 15: 64, 2015 May 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26016804

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) unit with digital intraoral radiography technique for detecting periodontal defects. METHODS: The study material comprised 12 dry skulls with maxilla and mandible. Artificial defects (dehiscence, tunnel, and fenestration) were created on anterior, premolar and molar teeth separately using burs. In total 14 dehiscences, 13 fenestrations, eight tunnel and 16 without periodontal defect were used in the study. These were randomly created on dry skulls. Each teeth with and without defects were images at various vertical angles using each of the following modalities: a Planmeca Promax Cone Beam CT and a Digora photostimulable phosphor plates. Specificity and sensitivity for assessing periodontal defects by each radiographic technique were calculated. Chi-square statistics were used to evaluate differences between modalities. Kappa statistics assessed the agreement between observers. Results were considered significant at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The kappa values for inter-observer agreement between observers ranged between 0.78 and 0.96 for the CBCT, and 0.43 and 0.72 of intraoral images. The Kappa values for detecting defects on anterior teeth was the least, following premolar and molar teeth both CBCT and intraoral imaging. CONCLUSIONS: CBCT has the highest sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy for detecting various periodontal defects among the radiographic modalities examined.


Asunto(s)
Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Mandibulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Maxilares/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Dental Digital/estadística & datos numéricos , Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar/diagnóstico por imagen , Anatomía Transversal/estadística & datos numéricos , Diente Premolar/diagnóstico por imagen , Defectos de Furcación/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/estadística & datos numéricos , Imagenología Tridimensional/estadística & datos numéricos , Técnicas In Vitro , Incisivo/diagnóstico por imagen , Diente Molar/diagnóstico por imagen , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
17.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 147(2): 197-204, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25636553

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the adenoidal nasopharyngeal ratio (ANR) on lateral cephalograms by assessing upper airway volumes using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images as the validation method. METHODS: Fifty-five patients were included in the study, and it was essential that the lateral cephalograms and CBCT images taken at their examinations were not more than 1 week apart. There were 32 subjects in group A (age ≤15 years) and 23 subjects in group B (age >15 years). The ANR was measured on the lateral cephalograms. The area and volumetric measurements of the nasopharynx and the total upper airway were obtained from CBCT images. Repeated measurements of the ANR and airway volume were performed on 10 subjects by 2 observers. RESULTS: Group A had a higher correlation (r = -0.78) between the ANR and the nasopharynx volume than did group B (r = -0.57). The ANR had a weak correlation with the total upper airway volume (group A, r = -0.48; group B, r = -0.32). Both measurements made on lateral cephalograms and CBCT were highly reproducible in terms of intraobserver and interobserver agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, the measurement of the ANR on lateral cephalograms can be used as an initial screening method to estimate the nasopharynx volumes of younger patients (age ≤15 years).


Asunto(s)
Cefalometría/estadística & datos numéricos , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/estadística & datos numéricos , Nasofaringe/anatomía & histología , Tonsila Faríngea/anatomía & histología , Tonsila Faríngea/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Nasofaringe/diagnóstico por imagen , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Tamaño de los Órganos , Faringe/anatomía & histología , Faringe/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Dental Digital/estadística & datos numéricos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
18.
J Periodontol ; 86(5): 646-55, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25594426

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Subjective radiographic classifications of alveolar bone have been proposed and correlated with implant insertion torque (IT). The present diagnostic study aims to identify quantitative bone features influencing IT and to use these findings to develop an objective radiographic classification for predicting IT. METHODS: Demographics, panoramic radiographs (taken at the beginning of dental treatment), and cone-beam computed tomographic scans (taken for implant surgical planning) of 25 patients receiving 31 implants were analyzed. Bone samples retrieved from implant sites were assessed with dual x-ray absorptiometry, microcomputed tomography, and histology. Odds ratio, sensitivity, and specificity of all variables to predict high peak IT were assessed. RESULTS: A ridge cortical thickness >0.75 mm and a normal appearance of the inferior mandibular cortex were the most sensitive variables for predicting high peak IT (87.5% and 75%, respectively). A classification based on the combination of both variables presented high sensitivity (90.9%) and specificity (100%) for predicting IT. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, the results suggest that it is possible to predict IT accurately based on radiographic findings of the patient. This could be useful in the treatment plan of immediate loading cases.


Asunto(s)
Proceso Alveolar/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/estadística & datos numéricos , Implantación Dental Endoósea/métodos , Implantes Dentales , Radiografía Panorámica/estadística & datos numéricos , Absorciometría de Fotón/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Proceso Alveolar/patología , Proceso Alveolar/cirugía , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Biopsia/métodos , Densidad Ósea/fisiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Predicción , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/estadística & datos numéricos , Arcada Parcialmente Edéntula/diagnóstico por imagen , Arcada Parcialmente Edéntula/cirugía , Masculino , Mandíbula/diagnóstico por imagen , Mandíbula/patología , Mandíbula/cirugía , Maxilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Maxilar/patología , Maxilar/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía Dental Digital/estadística & datos numéricos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Torque , Microtomografía por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos
19.
Acta Odontol Scand ; 73(3): 195-201, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25415368

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was introduced to Norwegian dental clinics in 2007. The aim of the study was to investigate how dental clinics use this imaging modality, including factors related to workflow and image quality, and to evaluate dentists' opinions on and experiences of using it. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web-based 59-item questionnaire regarding the clinical use of CBCT was sent to all 39 CBCT clinics in Norway. RESULTS: Twenty-nine clinics (74%) responded. Most respondents (93%) were from clinics with more than one dentist and 83% had at least one specialist. All clinics had digital intraoral x-ray receptors and all but one had panoramic imaging. The most common indications for CBCT were implant treatment planning (34% of all clinics) and localization of impacted teeth (43% of specialist clinics). Seventy-two per cent of clinics reported an average of four or fewer CBCT examinations each week and 83% of respondents were subjectively satisfied with the image quality. The most commonly used enhancement functions were contrast (97%), brightness (90%) and zoom (86%). CONCLUSIONS: The Norwegian CBCT clinics surveyed were fully digitized and had multiple dentists. Periodontists and oral and maxillofacial surgeons were the most frequent specialties represented in the clinics. Clinics with only dental specialists performed more CBCT examinations/week than clinics with general practitioners or both general practitioners and specialists. The most common indications for CBCT examinations were related to treatment planning. This study found some challenges related to image quality and communication within the radiological team.


Asunto(s)
Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/estadística & datos numéricos , Clínicas Odontológicas , Odontólogos , Pautas de la Práctica en Odontología , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/normas , Implantes Dentales , Odontólogos/psicología , Femenino , Odontología General , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Cirujanos Oromaxilofaciales , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Periodoncia , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica/normas , Radiografía Dental Digital/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Panorámica/estadística & datos numéricos , Diente Impactado/diagnóstico por imagen , Flujo de Trabajo
20.
J Prosthet Dent ; 113(1): 39-47, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25311793

RESUMEN

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Although the postprocessing of digital images with enhancement filters could lead to the presence of artifacts and result in false-positive diagnoses, no study has analyzed whether the use of digital radiographs and/or postprocessing of digital images interferes with the diagnosis of marginal adaptation in metal-restored teeth. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital radiographic images with and without filters for detecting a misfit between the tooth and restoration in metal-restored teeth. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty teeth with mesial-occlusal-distal inlays and 40 with complete crowns (each with a perfect fit, 20 with a 0.2-mm gap and 20 with a 0.4-mm gap) were imaged with conventional film and digital phosphor plate systems. Digital radiographs were exported as original images and with edge enhancement (high and low), inversion, and pseudo-3-dimensional filters. Four examiners assessed the presence of gaps by using a categorical scale (fit, misfit, cannot decide). Sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy were calculated for each variable. In addition, time spent scoring the images was recorded. A multivariate logistic regression was performed with accuracy as the dependent variable. RESULTS: Of the images, 6.2% received the score "cannot decide," most of them with a high edge enhancement filter and in the crown group. A tendency for higher sensitivity (range 0.67-0.83), specificity (range 0.81-0.92), and accuracy (range 0.73-0.86) values was found in conventional and digital original images. Results of a logistic regression found that restoration type, gap size, and high enhancement and inversion filters had a statistically significant impact on accuracy (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Original nonfiltered images should be used to assess teeth with metal restorations. High enhancement filters and image inversion should be avoided, especially when metal crowns are present.


Asunto(s)
Coronas , Aleaciones Dentales/química , Adaptación Marginal Dental , Incrustaciones , Radiografía Dental Digital/estadística & datos numéricos , Diente/diagnóstico por imagen , Filtración/instrumentación , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/estadística & datos numéricos , Imagenología Tridimensional/instrumentación , Imagenología Tridimensional/estadística & datos numéricos , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica , Radiografía Dental Digital/instrumentación , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores de Tiempo , Película para Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Pantallas Intensificadoras de Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...