BACKGROUND: The gut microbiota is strongly associated with radiation-induced gut damage. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of intestinal microecological transplantation for treating patients with chronic radiation enteritis. CASE SUMMARY: A 64-year-old female with cervical cancer developed abdominal pain, diarrhea, and blood in the stool 1 year after radiotherapy. An electronic colonoscopy was performed to diagnose chronic radiation enteritis. Two courses of intestinal microecological transplantation and full-length 16S rRNA microbiological analysis were performed. The patient experienced short- and long-term relief from symptoms without adverse effects. Whole 16S rRNA sequencing revealed significant differences in the intestinal flora's composition between patient and healthy donors. Pathogenic bacteria, such as Escherichia fergusonii and Romboutsia timonensis, were more in the patient. Beneficial bacteria such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Fusicatenibacter saccharivorans, Ruminococcus bromii, and Bifidobacterium longum were more in the healthy donors. Intestinal microbiota transplantation resulted in a significant change in the patient's intestinal flora composition. The composition converged with the donor's flora, with an increase in core beneficial intestinal bacteria, such as Eubacterium rectale, and a decrease in pathogenic bacteria. Changes in the intestinal flora corresponded with the patients' alleviating clinical symptoms. CONCLUSION: Intestinal microecological transplantation is an effective treatment for relieving the clinical symptoms of chronic radiation enteritis by altering the composition of the intestinal flora. This study provides a new approach for treating patients with chronic radiation enteritis.
Enteritis , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Radiation Injuries , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Enteritis/microbiology , Enteritis/diagnosis , Enteritis/etiology , Enteritis/therapy , Radiation Injuries/diagnosis , Radiation Injuries/microbiology , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiation Injuries/surgery , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/radiation effects , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation/methods , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/radiotherapy , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Treatment Outcome , Chronic Disease , Colonoscopy , Intestines/microbiology , Intestines/radiation effects , Feces/microbiology , Radiotherapy/adverse effects
BACKGROUND: The health-care industry is a substantial contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions, yet the specific environmental impact of radiotherapy, a cornerstone of cancer treatment, remains under-explored. We aimed to quantify the emissions associated with the delivery of radiotherapy in the USA and propose a framework for reducing the environmental impact of oncology care. METHODS: In this multi-institutional retrospective analysis and simulation study, we conducted a lifecycle assessment of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for ten anatomical disease sites, adhering to the International Organization for Standardization's standards ISO 14040 and ISO 14044. We analysed retrospective data from Jan 1, 2017, to Oct 1, 2023, encompassing patient and staff travel, medical supplies, and equipment and building energy use associated with the use of EBRT at four academic institutions in the USA. The primary objective was to measure the environmental impacts across ten categories: greenhouse gases (expressed as kg of carbon dioxide equivalents [CO2e]), ozone depletion, smog formation, acidification, eutrophication, carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic potential, respiratory effects, fossil fuel depletion, and ecotoxicity. Human health effects secondary to these environmental impacts were also estimated as disability-adjusted life years. We also assessed the potential benefits of hypofractionated regimens for breast and genitourinary (ie, prostate and bladder) cancers on US greenhouse gas emissions using an analytic model based on the 2014 US National Cancer Database for fractionation patterns and patient commute distances. FINDINGS: We estimated that the mean greenhouse gas emissions associated with a standard 25-fraction EBRT course were 4310 kg CO2e (SD 2910), which corresponded to 0·0035 disability-adjusted life years per treatment course. Transit and building energy usage accounted for 25·73% (1110 kg CO2e) and 73·95% of (3190 kg CO2e) of total greenhouse gas emissions, respectively, whereas supplies contributed only 0·32% (14 kg CO2e). Across the other environmental impact categories, most of the environmental impact also stemmed from patient transit and energy use within facilities, with little environmental impact contributed by supplies used. Hypofractionated treatment simulations suggested a substantial reduction in greenhouse gas emissions-by up to 42% for breast and 77% for genitourinary cancer-and environmental impacts more broadly. INTERPRETATION: This comprehensive lifecycle assessment of EBRT delineates the environmental and secondary health impacts of radiotherapy, and underscores the urgent need for sustainable practices in oncology. The findings serve as a reference for future decarbonisation efforts in cancer care and show the potential environmental benefits of modifying treatment protocols (when clinical equipoise exists). They also highlight strategic opportunities to mitigate the ecological footprint in an era of escalating climate change and increasing cancer prevalence. FUNDING: Mount Zion Health Fund.
Neoplasms , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , United States , Greenhouse Gases/adverse effects , Greenhouse Gases/analysis , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Environment , Computer Simulation
Radiotherapy for non-tumoral disorders has a long history. Lack of high-level evidence, therapeutic alternatives and fear of side effects (particularly radiation-induced cancer) reduced some indications to a trickle during the second half of the 20th century. Others were logically abandoned. There are two exceptions to this trend. On the one hand, some Central European countries (Germany in particular) still use radiotherapy regularly for diseases such as osteoarthritis, plantar fasciitis, chronic tendinopathies, Dupuytren's disease, etc. On the other hand, the development of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy has opened up new indications, whether cerebral (arteriovenous malformations, trigeminal neuralgia, obsessive-compulsive disorders) or cardiac (ventricular tachycardia). In this article, we present a non-exhaustive list of some indications (or rather possibilities) for radiotherapy in non-tumoral disorders in 2024.
La radiothérapie des pathologies non tumorales possède une longue histoire. L'absence de preuves d'un niveau élevé, les alternatives thérapeutiques et la peur d'effets secondaires (en particulier le cancer radio-induit) ont réduit certaines indications à peau de chagrin durant la seconde moitié du 20ème siècle. D'autres ont logiquement été abandonnées. Deux exceptions existent concernant cette diminution. D'une part, certains pays d'Europe centrale (l'Allemagne en particulier) continuent d'utiliser régulièrement la radiothérapie dans des pathologies telles que l'arthrose, la fasciite plantaire, les tendinopathies chroniques, la maladie de Dupuytren ... D'autre part, le développement de la radiothérapie stéréotaxique ablative a permis d'envisager de nouvelles indications qu'elles soient cérébrales (malformations artério-veineuses, névralgie du trijumeau, troubles obsessionnels compulsifs) ou cardiaques (tachycardie ventriculaire). Nous présentons, de façon non exhaustive, quelques indications (ou plutôt possibilités) de radiothérapie dans les pathologies non tumorales utilisées en 2024.
Radiotherapy , Humans , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Radiotherapy/history , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century
Radiation therapy is the use of radiation to treat cancer cells while preserving healthy tissue. More than half of cancer patients will receive radiation therapy at some point during their treatment. The implementation of a Quality Management System (QMS) in radiotherapy departments guarantees high quality care and optimal safety for patients. The QMS is a set of policies, procedures and processes aimed at ensuring effective management of the quality of treatments. It is crucial for planning, implementing, monitoring and continuously improving the care of radiotherapy patients. The benefits of the QMS for patients are multiple. It provides high quality support through specific protocols and deadlines. The security of processing is reinforced by the continuous training of personnel, the monitoring of incidents and the analysis of errors. Developing a culture of safety and continuous improvement also helps to minimize risk. In conclusion, the implementation of a QMS in radiotherapy departments guarantees quality care, secure and adapted to the individual needs of patients. This improves patient satisfaction while reducing the risk of errors.
La radiothérapie consiste à utiliser des radiations pour traiter les cellules cancéreuses, tout en préservant les tissus sains. Plus de la moitié des patients atteints de cancer recevront une radiothérapie à un moment donné de leur traitement. La mise en place d'un Système de Management Qualité (SMQ) dans les services de radiothérapie garantit des soins de haute qualité et une sécurité optimale pour les patients. Le SMQ est un ensemble de politiques, procédures et processus visant à assurer la gestion efficace de la qualité des traitements. Il est crucial pour planifier, implémenter, contrôler et améliorer continuellement la prise en charge des patients en radiothérapie. Les avantages du SMQ sont multiples. Il assure une prise en charge de haute qualité grâce à des protocoles et des délais spécifiques. La sécurité des traitements est renforcée par la formation continue du personnel, la surveillance des incidents et l'analyse des erreurs. Le développement d'une culture de sécurité et d'amélioration continue contribue également à minimiser les risques. En conclusion, la mise en place d'un SMQ dans les services de radiothérapie garantit des traitements de qualité, sécurisés et adaptés aux besoins individuels des patients. Cette approche améliore la satisfaction des patients, tout en réduisant les risques d'erreurs.
Patient Safety , Radiotherapy , Humans , Radiotherapy/standards , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Radiotherapy/methods , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Neoplasms/radiotherapy
OBJECTIVE: Radiation therapy (RT) may increase the risk of second cancer. This study aimed to determine the association between exposure to radiotherapy for the treatment of thoracic cancer (TC) and subsequent secondary lung cancer (SLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (from 1975 to 2015) was queried for TC. Univariate Cox regression analyses and multiple primary standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were used to assess the risk of SLC. Subgroup analyses of patients stratified by latency time since TC diagnosis, age at TC diagnosis, and calendar year of TC diagnosis stage were also performed. Overall survival and SLC-related death were compared among the RT and no radiation therapy (NRT) groups by using Kaplan-Meier analysis and competitive risk analysis. RESULTS: In a total of 329 129 observations, 147 847 of whom had been treated with RT. And 6799 patients developed SLC. Receiving radiotherapy was related to a higher risk of developing SLC for TC patients (adjusted HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.19-1.32; P < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of developing SLC in TC patients with RT (3.8%) was higher than the cumulative incidence (2.9%) in TC patients with NRT(P). The incidence risk of SLC in TC patients who received radiotherapy was significantly higher than the US general population (SIR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.14-1.23; P < 0.050). CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy for TC was associated with higher risks of developing SLC compared with patients unexposed to radiotherapy.
Lung Neoplasms , Neoplasms, Second Primary , SEER Program , Thoracic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Female , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Aged , Incidence , Prognosis , Thoracic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Thoracic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Risk Assessment/methods , Adult
Importance: Patients with head and neck cancer who undergo radiotherapy can develop chronic radiation-induced xerostomia. Prior acupuncture studies were single center and rated as having high risk of bias, making it difficult to know the benefits of acupuncture for treating radiation-induced xerostomia. Objective: To compare true acupuncture (TA), sham acupuncture (SA), and standard oral hygiene (SOH) for treating radiation-induced xerostomia. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized, blinded, 3-arm, placebo-controlled trial was conducted between July 29, 2013, and June 9, 2021. Data analysis was performed from March 9, 2022, through May 17, 2023. Patients reporting grade 2 or 3 radiation-induced xerostomia 12 months or more postradiotherapy for head and neck cancer were recruited from community-based cancer centers across the US that were part of the Wake Forest National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program Research Base. Participants had received bilateral radiotherapy with no history of xerostomia. Interventions: Participants received SOH and were randomized to TA, SA, or SOH only. Participants in the TA and SA cohorts were treated 2 times per week for 4 weeks. Those experiencing a minor response received another 4 weeks of treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient-reported outcomes for xerostomia (Xerostomia Questionnaire, primary outcome) and quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) were collected at baseline, 4 (primary time point), 8, 12, and 26 weeks. All analyses were intention to treat. Results: A total of 258 patients (201 men [77.9%]; mean [SD] age, 65.0 [9.16] years), participated from 33 sites across 13 states. Overall, 86 patients were assigned to each study arm. Mean (SD) years from diagnosis was 4.21 (3.74) years, 67.1% (n = 173) had stage IV disease. At week 4, Xerostomia Questionnaire scores revealed significant between-group differences, with lower Xerostomia Questionnaire scores with TA vs SOH (TA: 50.6; SOH: 57.3; difference, -6.67; 95% CI, -11.08 to -2.27; P = .003), and differences between TA and SA (TA: 50.6; SA: 55.0; difference, -4.41; 95% CI, -8.62 to -0.19; P = .04) yet did not reach statistical significance after adjustment for multiple comparisons. There was no significant difference between SA and SOH. Group differences in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scores revealed statistically significant group differences at week 4, with higher scores with TA vs SOH (TA: 101.6; SOH: 97.7; difference, 3.91; 95% CI, 1.43-6.38; P = .002) and at week 12, with higher scores with TA vs SA (TA: 102.1; SA: 98.4; difference, 3.64; 95% CI, 1.10-6.18; P = .005) and TA vs SOH (TA: 102.1; SOH: 97.4; difference, 4.61; 95% CI, 1.99-7.23; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this trial suggest that TA was more effective in treating chronic radiation-induced xerostomia 1 or more years after the end of radiotherapy than SA or SOH. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02589938.
Acupuncture Therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Radiation Injuries , Xerostomia , Humans , Xerostomia/etiology , Xerostomia/therapy , Male , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Acupuncture Therapy/methods , Radiation Injuries/therapy , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Radiotherapy/adverse effects
Background and Objectives: Chronic radiotherapy-induced skin injury (cRISI) is an irreversible and progressive condition that can significantly impact a patient's quality of life. Despite the limited literature available on the assessment of the epidermal barrier in cRISI, there is a consensus that appropriate skincare, including the use of emollients, is the primary therapeutic approach for this group of patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biophysical properties of the skin during the late period (at least 90 days) following radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer. Materials and Methods: This was a single-center prospective non-randomized study. It involved the analysis of 16 adult patients with head and neck cancer who underwent RT at the Greater Poland Cancer Center, along with 15 healthy volunteers. The study and control groups were matched for gender and age (p = 0.51). Clinical assessment, based on the LENT-SOMA scale, was conducted for all patients. Evaluation of the skin's biophysical properties included: an analysis of transepidermal water loss (TEWL), stratum corneum hydration (SCH), and skin visualization using high-frequency ultrasonography (HF-USG). Results: A significantly higher TEWL was observed in the irradiated area compared to the control area in the study group (p = 0.004). However, there was no statistically significant difference in SCH (p = 0.073). Additionally, no significant difference was observed in the values of TEWL and SCH in the irradiated area between the group of patients with and without clinically obvious RISI (p = 0.192 and p = 0.415, respectively). The skin thickness of the irradiated area, assessed by HF-USG, did not differ significantly from the skin thickness of the control area (p = 0.638). Furthermore, no difference in skin thickness was observed in patients with clinical features of cRISI in the irradiated and control areas (p = 0.345). The mean time after RT was 6.1 years. Conclusions: This study marks the first demonstration of epidermal barrier damage in patients in the long term following RT for head and neck cancer. The impairment of the epidermal barrier was observed independently of evident cRISI features. This observation underscores the necessity to recommend appropriate skin care, including the use of emollients, for all patients following RT. We also suggest that HF-USG examination is generally inconclusive in determining the degree of skin damage in the late period after RT.
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Humans , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Aged , Adult , Skin/radiation effects , Poland , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Radiotherapy/methods , Quality of Life
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated carotid artery stenosis (CAS) and associated risk factors in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) post-radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The observation group comprised 86 reexamined patients with NPC, divided into Group 1 and Group 2 based on post-radiotherapy duration, alongside 34 newly diagnosed patients with NPC (Group 0). Carotid artery ultrasonography and chi-square analysis were performed. RESULTS: Moderate-to-severe vascular abnormalities were exclusively in Group 2. Considering mild vascular abnormalities as the standard, the overall vascular abnormality rates in Group 2 and Group 0 were 65.9% and 41.2%, respectively. In Group 2 and Group 0, the abnormality rates for unilateral carotid artery (UCA), common carotid artery (CCA), internal carotid artery (ICA), and external carotid artery (ECA) were 47.4% and 30.9%, 44.3% and 22.1%, 44.3% and 16.2%, and 39.8% and 5.9%, respectively. Comparing group 1 to group 0, only UCA abnormalities were statistically significant (45.4% vs. 30.9%). Considering moderate-to-severe vascular abnormalities as the standard, Group 2 had higher overall vascular, UCA, CCA, ICA, and ECA abnormality rates compared to Group 0. The age at revisit over 45 years, T stage, and N stage may influence CAS. CONCLUSION: Radiation increasing CAS incidence after 3 years. So, regular examinations are recommended to dynamically monitor CAS after 3 years of radiotherapy.
Carotid Stenosis , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms , Humans , Carotid Stenosis/etiology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/radiotherapy , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Risk Factors , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiation Injuries/epidemiology , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Young Adult , Carcinoma/radiotherapy
The aim of this systematic review was to describe the efficacy and acceptability of natural products in the management of oral mucositis caused by radiation. From the day it started to August 7, 2023, a thorough search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was carried out among seven databases: the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, OVID, Scopus, the Cochrane Library and the CINAHL database. Only English-language articles were identified during the search. Using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, version 2, two researchers screened the articles, collected information on study characteristics, and appraised risks of bias. The data were analyzed and descriptively presented with a narrative synthesis methodology involving the Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) reporting element applied in detail. The PROSPERO registration number of this study is CRD42023476932. Thirty-six clinical trials were included in the study; the included studies included a variety of 20 types of natural products. Honey and Curcuma longa were the most commonly assessed natural products. A total of 2,400 participants reported taking part in therapy with natural products for oral mucositis. Natural products demonstrated substantial efficacy in terms of influencing intensity, incidence, pain score, quality of life, and symptoms such as xerostomia and dysphagia. Except for manuka honey, most natural products were well accepted. Regarding the clinical trials' risk of bias, 2 clinical trials (5.56%) had a high risk of bias, 17 studies (47.2%) had a low risk of bias, and 17 studies (47.2%) were rated with "some concern." Natural remedies work well as alternate treatments for managing oral mucositis caused by radiation therapy. However, additional clinical trials are still needed. The safety of these conventional medications as well as their effectiveness and safety when used in combination with other conventional or naturopathic therapies should be fully examined.
Biological Products , Radiotherapy , Stomatitis , Humans , Stomatitis/etiology , Stomatitis/drug therapy , Stomatitis/prevention & control , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Radiation Injuries/drug therapy , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy (RT)-induced pelvic insufficiency fractures (PIF) are prevalent in patients with cervical cancer. Inconclusive studies on PIF after cervical irradiation create uncertainty. This review examined PIF after RT in cervical patients, including its pathobiology, likely locations of fractures, incidence, clinical symptoms, and predisposing factors. We further discussed study limitations and therapeutic possibilities of PIF. METHODS: The following online resources were searched for relevant articles: Google Scholar and PubMed. The keywords 'pelvic insufficiency fractures', 'cervical carcinoma' and 'cervical cancer', as well as 'chemoradiotherapy', 'chemoradiation', and 'radiotherapy', were some of the terms that were used during the search. RESULTS: Patients with PIF report pelvic pain after radiation treatment for cervical cancer; the incidence of PIF ranges from 1.7 to 45.2%. Evidence also supports that among all patients treated with pelvic radiation, those who experienced pelvic insufficiency fractures invariably had at least one sacral fracture, making it the most frequently fractured bone in the body. Menopausal status, weight, BMI, age, and treatments and diagnosis modalities can influence PIF during radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our comparative review of the literature highlights significant heterogeneity in various aspects of PIF following radiation for patients with cervical cancer. This diversity encompasses prevalence rates, associated risk factors, symptoms, severity, diagnosis methods, preventive interventions, and follow-up periods. Such diversity underscores the complexity of PIF in this population and emphasizes the critical need for further research to elucidate optimal management strategies and improve patient outcomes.
Fractures, Stress , Pelvic Bones , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Female , Fractures, Stress/etiology , Pelvic Bones/injuries , Pelvic Bones/radiation effects , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiation Injuries/complications , Risk Factors , Radiotherapy/adverse effects
The major aim of Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) was to synthesize quantitative published dose/-volume/toxicity data in pediatric radiation therapy. Such systematic reviews are often challenging because of the lack of standardization and difficulty of reporting outcomes, clinical factors, and treatment details in journal articles. This has clinical consequences: optimization of treatment plans must balance between the risks of toxicity and local failure; counseling patients and their parents requires knowledge of the excess risks encountered after a specific treatment. Studies addressing outcomes after pediatric radiation therapy are particularly challenging because: (a) survivors may live for decades after treatment, and the latency time to toxicity can be very long; (b) children's maturation can be affected by radiation, depending on the developmental status of the organs involved at time of treatment; and (c) treatment regimens frequently involve chemotherapies, possibly modifying and adding to the toxicity of radiation. Here we discuss: basic reporting strategies to account for the actuarial nature of the complications; the reporting of modeling of abnormal development; and the need for standardized, comprehensively reported data sets and multivariate models (ie, accounting for the simultaneous effects of radiation dose, age, developmental status at time of treatment, and chemotherapy dose). We encourage the use of tools that facilitate comprehensive reporting, for example, electronic supplements for journal articles. Finally, we stress the need for clinicians to be able to trust artificial intelligence models of outcome of radiation therapy, which requires transparency, rigor, reproducibility, and comprehensive reporting. Adopting the reporting methods discussed here and in the individual PENTEC articles will increase the clinical and scientific usefulness of individual reports and associated pooled analyses.
Neoplasms , Radiation Injuries , Humans , Child , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Radiotherapy/standards , Cancer Survivors , Radiotherapy Dosage , Research Design/standards , Child, Preschool
Gastrointestinal mucositis (GIM) continues to be a significant issue in the management of abdominal cancer radiation treatments and chemotherapy, causing significant patient discomfort and therapy interruption or even cessation. This review will first focus on radiotherapy induced GIM, providing an understanding of its clinical landscape. Subsequently, the aetiology of GIM will be reviewed, highlighting diverse contributing factors. The cellular and tissue damage and associated molecular responses in GIM will be summarised in the context of the underlying complex biological processes. Finally, available drugs and pharmaceutical therapies will be evaluated, underscoring their insufficiency, and highlighting the need for further research and innovation. This review will emphasize the urgent need for improved pharmacologic therapeutics for GIM, which is a key research priority in oncology.
Mucositis , Radiation Injuries , Humans , Mucositis/drug therapy , Mucositis/etiology , Radiation Injuries/drug therapy , Animals , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Gastrointestinal Diseases/drug therapy , Gastrointestinal Diseases/etiology
OBJECTIVES: Radiation dermatitis is the most common reaction to radiotherapy, almost all breast cancer patients receive radiotherapy on an outpatient basis. Currently, there are no studies on the experience of radiation dermatitis and the ability to self-manage it. Therefore, we aimed to use qualitative approaches to gain a deeper understanding of the actual experiences and self-management ability in order to provide a reference for further improving the effectiveness of self-management and to optimize symptom management strategies. METHODS: A descriptive qualitative study was conducted using purposive sampling to select 17 breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Semi-structured interviews were conducted from September to November 2023. The Colaizzi seven-step analysis method was used to classify the data into summarized themes. RESULTS: Four themes were identified from the interview responses: (1) multiple self-reported skin symptoms in breast cancer patients with radiation dermatitis; (2) the multidimensional impact on patient's quality of life, especially pruritus, ulceration; (3) the ability to self-manage radiation dermatitis: strong mental toughness, positive response, and self-doubt; (4) challenges faced: concerns about radiotherapy side effects and recurrence, targeted symptom management and continuity of care after the radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare professionals should consider patients' self-reported symptoms when assessing radiation dermatitis. For pruritus and pain, we can enhance precision symptom management to improve patients' quality of life. By utilizing information technology tools, we can increase breast cancer patients' ability and confidence in managing radiation dermatitis effectively while enhancing accurate symptom management during radiotherapy.
Breast Neoplasms , Qualitative Research , Quality of Life , Radiodermatitis , Self-Management , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Middle Aged , Self-Management/methods , Radiodermatitis/etiology , Adult , Aged , China , Interviews as Topic , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , East Asian People
Oncological patients show intense catabolic activity, as well as a susceptibility to higher nutritional risk and clinical complications. Thus, tools are used for monitoring prognosis. Our objective was to analyze the nutrition prognosis of patients who underwent radiotherapy, correlating it with outcomes and complications. We performed a retrospective transversal study based on secondary data from hospital records of patients who started radiotherapy between July 2022 and July 2023. We established Prognostic Scores through a combination of Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and a Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), assessed at the beginning and end of treatment. Score 3 patients, with PNI ≤ 45.56 and an SGA outcome of malnutrition, initially presented a higher occurrence of odynophagia, later also being indicative of reduced diet volume, treatment interruption, and dysphagia. SGA alone showed sensitivity to altered diet volume, dysphagia, and xerostomia in the second assessment. Besides this, PNI ≤ 45.56 also indicated the use of alternative feeding routes, treatment interruption, and hospital discharge with more complications. We conclude that the scores could be used to indicate complications; however, further studies on combined biomarkers are necessary.
Malnutrition , Nutrition Assessment , Nutritional Status , Humans , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Aged , Malnutrition/etiology , Malnutrition/diagnosis , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult
Radiation therapy targeting the central nervous system is widely utilized for the management of various brain tumors, significantly prolonging patient survival. Presently, investigations are assessing both clinical and preclinical applications of low-dose radiation (LDR) for the treatment of neuropathological conditions beyond tumor therapy. Special focus is given to refractory neurodegenerative diseases linked to neuroinflammation, such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases, where LDR has shown promising results. This comprehensive review examines the existing experimental data regarding the utilization of LDR in neurological disorders. It covers potential advantages in reducing neurodegenerative alterations and inflammation, as well as possible adverse effects, including neurological impairments. The review underscores the importance of the exposure protocol and the age at which LDR is administered in the context of the nervous system's pathological and physiological states, as these elements are crucial in determining LDR's therapeutic and toxic outcomes. The article concludes with a discussion on the future directions and challenges in optimizing LDR use, aiming to reduce toxicity while effectively managing neurological disorders.
Nervous System Diseases , Humans , Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Nervous System Diseases/radiotherapy , Animals , Radiotherapy Dosage , Neurodegenerative Diseases/radiotherapy , Neurodegenerative Diseases/therapy , Radiotherapy/methods , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
The Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) consortium has made significant contributions to understanding and mitigating the adverse effects of childhood cancer therapy. This review addresses the role of diagnostic imaging in detecting, screening, and comprehending radiation therapy-related late effects in children, drawing insights from individual organ-specific PENTEC reports. We further explore how the development of imaging biomarkers for key organ systems, alongside technical advancements and translational imaging approaches, may enhance the systematic application of imaging evaluations in childhood cancer survivors. Moreover, the review critically examines knowledge gaps and identifies technical and practical limitations of existing imaging modalities in the pediatric population. Addressing these challenges may expand access to, minimize the risk of, and optimize the real-world application of, new imaging techniques. The PENTEC team envisions this document as a roadmap for the future development of imaging strategies in childhood cancer survivors, with the overarching goal of improving long-term health outcomes and quality of life for this vulnerable population.
Radiation Injuries , Humans , Child , Radiation Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Cancer Survivors , Organs at Risk/diagnostic imaging , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Diagnostic Imaging/methods
Case reports of plexopathy after prostate cancer are usually neoplastic. Radiation-induced lumbosacral plexopathy and insufficiency fractures have clinical significance due to the need to differentiate them from tumoral invasions, metastases, and spinal pathologies. Certain nuances, including clinical presentation and screening methods, help distinguish radiation-induced plexopathy from tumoral plexopathy. This case report highlights the coexistence of these two rare clinical conditions. Herein, we present a 78-year-old male with a history of radiotherapy for prostate cancer who developed right foot drop, severe lower back and right groin pain, difficulty in standing up and walking, and tingling in both legs over the past month during remission. The diagnosis of lumbosacral plexopathy and pelvic insufficiency fracture was made based on magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, and electroneuromyography. The patient received conservative symptomatic treatment and was discharged with the use of a cane for mobility. Radiation-induced lumbosacral plexopathy following prostate cancer should be kept in mind in patients with neurological disorders of the lower limbs. Pelvic insufficiency fracture should also be considered if the pain does not correspond to the clinical findings of plexopathy. These two pathologies, which can be challenging to diagnose, may require surgical or complex management approaches. However, in this patient, conservative therapies led to an improvement in quality of life and a reduction in the burden of illness.
Fractures, Stress , Lumbosacral Plexus , Prostatic Neoplasms , Radiation Injuries , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Aged , Lumbosacral Plexus/injuries , Lumbosacral Plexus/radiation effects , Lumbosacral Plexus/pathology , Fractures, Stress/etiology , Fractures, Stress/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiation Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Pelvic Bones/injuries , Pelvic Bones/pathology , Pelvic Bones/diagnostic imaging , Pelvic Bones/radiation effects , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Radiotherapy/adverse effects
To accept the toxic side effects of any treatment, whether medical, surgical or radiotherapeutic, cannot be avoided but implies to evaluate them taking into account the severity and prognosis of the disease that is concerned. Screening, preventing and treatment of these side effects are an integral aspect of the treatment of cancers. We will here review the contribution of the cardio-oncology, a recently emerged medical specialty. Cardiac irradiation cannot be avoided when treating several cancers, most frequently left sided breast cancer. As soon as radiotherapy is considered, it is of prime importance to evaluate each patient's risk factors and to handle them. If technical progresses have led to the complete disappearance of acute side effects of radiotherapy, this is not true for the delayed ones that may occur many years after the irradiation. Hence the need for «red flags¼ and for a systematic follow-up. Cardiac complications of left breast irradiation concern all aspects of cardiology: diseases of cardiac rhythm, valvulopathies, heart failure, coronary and pericardial disorders.
Admettre les effets secondaires d'un traitement, qu'il soit médical, chirurgical ou radiothérapique, est inévitable, mais impose de les évaluer en intégrant la gravité de l'affection pour laquelle ils sont prescrits. Leur dépistage, leur prévention et leur prise en charge font partie intégrante du traitement d'un cancer. Dans cette revue, nous ferons la synthèse de l'apport à cette démarche d'une discipline récente, la cardio-oncologie. L'irradiation cardiaque est incontournable lors du traitement de plusieurs cancers au premier rang desquels le cancer du sein gauche. Dès qu'elle est envisagée, il est essentiel d'évaluer les facteurs de risque de chaque patient et d'organiser leur prise en charge éventuelle. En effet, si les progrès techniques ont permis la disparition des complications cardiaques aiguës de la radiothérapie, ce n'est encore pas le cas des complications différées qui peuvent survenir de nombreuses années après l'irradiation. D'où la nécessité de «drapeaux rouges¼ et d'un suivi régulier systématique. Ces complications, rarement isolées, concernent tous les aspects de la cardiologie : troubles du rythme, valvulopathies, insuffisance cardiaque, maladies coronaires et atteintes péricardiques.
Cardiotoxicity , Radiotherapy , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Cardiotoxicity/prevention & control , Cardiotoxicity/etiology , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Diseases/prevention & control , Heart Diseases/etiology , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Female
