[Pharmacological profiles and clinical efficacy of ozoralizumab (Nanozora® 30†|mg Syringes for S.C. Injection), the first Nanobody® compound in Japan].

Ozoralizumab, a novel TNF inhibitor, is the first NANOBODY® compound in Japan for rheumatoid arthritis. This compound consists of a humanized fusion protein with a trimeric structure having two anti-human TNFα NANOBODY® molecules and one anti-human serum albumin NANOBODY® molecule, and has the unique structure without an Fc portion. Ozoralizumab showed an inhibitory effect on TNFα-induced cell death, and its inhibitory concentration was lower than that of etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab. Ozoralizumab also showed inhibitory effects on human TNFα-induced cellular infiltration in the murine air pouch model and reduced the arthritis scores in a murine rheumatoid arthritis model. In addition, ozoralizumab showed distinctive pharmacological characteristics different from the traditional IgG antibodies, which may be attributed to its unique structure, such as its ability to rapidly distribute to inflamed joint tissues in a murine rheumatoid arthritis model, and its immune complexes with TNFα do not induce inflammation in a murine subcutaneous inflammation model. In clinical trials, ozoralizumab demonstrated clinical efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to methotrexate, which was observed from day 3 of treatment. Ozolalizumab also showed improvements in clinical symptoms in rheumatoid arthritis patients without methotrexate. The safety profile of the compound was not significantly different from that of current TNF inhibitors. Based on these results, ozoralizumab was approved in September 2022. Ozoralizumab shows early improvement of clinical symptoms in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and its characteristic structure is expected to be new treatment options for patients who have an inadequate response to current bDMARDs.

Predictive Value of Serum Biomarkers for Response of Limited-Stage AIDS-Associated Kaposi Sarcoma to Antiretroviral Therapy With or Without Concomitant Chemotherapy in Resource-Limited Settings.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for limited-stage human immunodeficiency virus-associated Kaposi sarcoma (AIDS/KS) recommend antiretroviral therapy (ART) as initial treatment. However, many such individuals show worsening KS and require additional chemotherapy. Methods to identify such patients are lacking. SETTING: We studied whether serum levels of biomarkers associated with angiogenesis, systemic inflammation, and immune activation, which are elevated in HIV-infected individuals and implicated in the development of KS, could prospectively identify individuals with limited-stage AIDS-KS who would benefit from chemotherapy administered with ART. METHODS: Serum specimens were obtained from participants in a randomized trial evaluating the value of adding oral etoposide chemotherapy to ART in treatment-naïve people with limited-stage AIDS-KS in resource-limited settings. Serum biomarkers of inflammation (C-reactive protein [CRP], interleukin [IL]-6, IL-8, IL-10, granulocyte colony stimulating factor, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-2), immune system activation (soluble IL-2 receptor alfa, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10/interferon gamma-induced protein 10, C-C motif ligand 2/monocyte chemoattractant protein 1), and angiogenesis (vascular endothelial growth factor, matrix metalloproteinase-2, -9, endoglin, hepatocyte growth factor) were measured at entry to determine whether baseline levels are associated with KS response. On-treatment changes in biomarker levels were determined to assess how etoposide modifies the effects of ART. RESULTS: Pretreatment CRP and IL-10 were higher in those whose KS progressed, and lowest in those who had good clinical responses. Pretreatment CRP, IL-6, and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-2 showed significant associations with KS progression at the week-48 primary endpoint. Immediate etoposide led to lower inflammation biomarker levels compared with ART alone. Early KS progression was associated with elevated pretreatment levels of inflammation-associated biomarkers and increasing levels post-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Quantifying serum biomarkers, especially CRP, may help identify persons with AIDS-KS who would benefit from early introduction of chemotherapy in addition to ART.

Efficacy of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor combined with intra-articular injection of triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of refractory rheumatoid arthritis synovitis: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether there is a difference in the efficacy of intra-articular injection of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor and triamcinolone acetonide (HA) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with recurrent synovitis after the first intra-articular injection of HA. METHODS: RA patients who relapsed 12 weeks after the first HA treatment were enrolled in this study. After joint cavity extraction, recombinant human TNF receptor-antibody fusion protein (TNFR:FC) (25 mg or 12.5 mg) or HA (1 ml or 0.5 ml) was injected then. The changes in the visual analog scale (VAS), joint swelling index, and joint tenderness index before and 12 weeks after reinjection were compared and analyzed. The changes in synovial thickness, synovial blood flow, and fluid dark zone depth before and after reinjection were observed by ultrasound. RESULTS: Forty-two RA patients were enrolled, including 11 males and 31 females, with an average age of 46.79 ± 12.61 years and an average disease duration of 7.76 ± 5.44 years. After 12 weeks of intra-articular injection of HA or TNFR:FC, the VAS scores were significantly lower than those before treatment (P < 0.01). After 12 weeks of injection, the scores of the joint swelling index and tenderness index in both groups were significantly decreased compared with those before treatment. There was no significant difference in synovial thickness under ultrasound in the HA group before and after injection, while the synovial thickness in the TNFR:FC group was significantly improved after 12 weeks (P < 0.01). After 12 weeks of injection, the grade of synovial blood flow signal in both groups decreased significantly compared with that before treatment, especially in the TNFR:FC group. After 12 weeks of injection, the depth of the liquid dark area under ultrasound decreased significantly in the HA group and TNFR:FC group compared with that before treatment (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Intra-articular injection of a TNF inhibitor is an effective method for the treatment of recurrent synovitis after conventional hormone therapy. Compared with HA treatment, it can reduce synovial thickness. Key Points • Intra-articular injection of a TNF inhibitor is an effective method for the treatment of recurrent synovitis after conventional hormone therapy. • Compared with HA treatment, intra-articular injection of biological agents combined with glucocorticoids can not only relieve joint pain but also significantly inhibit joint swelling. • Compared with HA treatment, intra-articular injection of biological agents combined with glucocorticoids cannot only improve synovial inflammation but also inhibit synovial proliferation. • For the treatment of refractory RA synovitis, biological agents combined with glucocorticoid injection are an effective and safe option.

Pharmacodynamic activity of BMS-986156, a glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor-related protein agonist, alone or in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: The success of immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized cancer treatment options and triggered development of new complementary immunotherapeutic strategies, including T-cell co-stimulatory molecules, such as glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor-related protein (GITR). BMS-986156 is a fully agonistic human immunoglobulin G subclass 1 monoclonal antibody targeting GITR. We recently presented the clinical data for BMS-986156 with or without nivolumab, which demonstrated no compelling evidence of clinical activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. Here, we further report the pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarker data from this open-label, first-in-human, phase I/IIa study of BMS-986156 ± nivolumab in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT02598960). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed PD changes of circulating immune cell subsets and cytokines in peripheral blood or serum samples collected from a dataset of 292 patients with solid tumors before and during treatment with BMS-986156 ± nivolumab. PD changes in the tumor immune microenvironment were measured by immunohistochemistry and a targeted gene expression panel. RESULTS: BMS-986156 + nivolumab induced a significant increase in peripheral T-cell and natural killer (NK) cell proliferation and activation, accompanied by production of proinflammatory cytokines. However, no significant changes in expression of CD8A, programmed death-ligand 1, tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily members, or key genes linked with functional parameters of T and NK cells were observed in tumor tissue upon treatment with BMS-986156. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the robust evidence of peripheral PD activity of BMS-986156, with or without nivolumab, limited evidence of T- or NK cell activation in the tumor microenvironment was observed. The data therefore explain, at least in part, the lack of clinical activity of BMS-986156 with or without nivolumab in unselected populations of cancer patients.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury due to Biologics and Immune Check Point Inhibitors.

Biological agents have in the last two decades become very important therapeutic agents, particularly for the treatment of various autoimmune disorders. The most widely used biologics are the tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) receptor antagonists: infliximab, adalimumab, and etanercept. Other commonly used biological agents are interleukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist (Anakinra), interleukin (IL)-6 receptor antagonist (tocilizumab), and CD20 surface antigen antagonist (rituximab). The current review will however focus on TNF-α receptor antagonists.

Interval prolongation of etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The majority of patients with a rheumatic disease treated with etanercept may be overexposed. Data regarding etanercept tapering are scarce, particularly in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). We compared extending the dose interval to continuation of the standard dose and studied the success rate of etanercept discontinuation. Etanercept concentrations were measured throughout the study. METHOD: 160 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), PsA, or AS with sustained minimal disease activity (MDA) were enrolled in this 18-month, open-label, randomized controlled trial. The intervention group doubled the dosing interval at baseline and discontinued etanercept 6 months later. The control group continued the standard dose for 6 months and doubled the dosing-interval thereafter. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients maintaining MDA at 6 month follow-up. RESULTS: At 6 months, MDA status was maintained in 47 patients (63%) in the intervention group and 56 (74%) in the control group (p = 0.15), with comparable results in all rheumatic diseases. And median etanercept concentrations decreased from 1.50 µg/mL (interquartile range 1.06- 2.65) to 0.46 µg/mL (0.28-0.92). In total, 40% discontinued etanercept successfully with maintained MDA for at least 6 months. CONCLUSION: Etanercept tapering can be done without losing efficacy in RA, PsA, and AS patients in sustained MDA. A substantial proportion of patients could stop etanercept for at least 6 months. In many patients, low drug concentrations proved sufficient to control disease activity. However, the risk of minor and major flares is substantial, even in patients continuing standard dosing.

Successful switching treatment of adalimumab for refractory pyoderma gangrenosum in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis with prior use of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: A case report and review of the literature.

Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare chronic skin disease characterised by painful skin ulcers. There are no treatment guidelines for PG, but systemic treatments including biologics are often used. Recently, adalimumab (ADA), a fully human monoclonal antibody against tumour necrosis factor, was approved for refractory PG treatment in Japan. Herein, we report a case of rheumatoid arthritis with refractory PG 2 months after orthopaedic surgery of the foot during treatment with low-dose etanercept and methotrexate. Although adding a moderate dose of glucocorticoid did not improve her PG, the patient showed a remarkable response after switching from etanercept to ADA in a higher dose than that used to treat rheumatoid arthritis. This higher dose of ADA may be effective for the treatment of refractory PG after the failure of other tumour necrosis factor inhibitors.

Long lasting response to anti-tumor necrosis factor α agents in psoriasis: A real life experience.

Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory disease for which no definitive cure exists and patients difficult to treat with moderate to severe psoriasis often require life-long therapy. In general, the use of any biologic agent as monotherapy allows a long-term efficacy, however survival response may progressively decrease over time. We report real-world long lasting response data in psoriatic patients on treatment with anti-TNFα evaluating those on the same anti-TNFα agent (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab) from January 2011 and December 2013 to December 31, 2021 as monotherapy. On 210 treated patients, 69 were found to maintain the same anti-TNFα agent. The median survival rate for etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab was 10, 9.6, and 9.5 years respectively and the efficacy rate was similar (mean PASI96). Our results demonstrate that anti-TNFα agents are a long-term effective and safe therapeutic option for a satisfying proportion (33%) of patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Further long-term real life studies are needed to better understand which are the causes of drug failure or persistent response and why these may occur at different time intervals in patients on the same drug.

Multiple anti-inflammatory mechanisms of Zedoary Turmeric Oil Injection against lipopolysaccharides-induced acute lung injury in rats elucidated by network pharmacology combined with transcriptomics.

BACKGROUND: Prospects for the drug treatment of acute lung injury (ALI) is unpromising. Managing inflammation can prevent ALI from progressing and minimize further deterioration. Zedoary turmeric oil injection (ZTOI), a patented traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) that has been used against ALI, has shown significant anti-inflammatory effects. However, the mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear. PURPOSE: Elucidate the anti-inflammatory mechanism by which ZTOI acts against ALI in rats using an ingredients-targets-pathways (I-T-P) interaction network. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The key ingredients of ZTOI were characterized using UPLC-MS/MS combined with literature mining. The target profiles of each ingredient were established using drug-target databases. The anti-inflammatory activity of ZTOI against lipopolysaccharides (LPS)-induced rat ALI was validated using histopathology and inflammatory factor assessments. The therapeutic targets of ZTOI were screened by integrating transcriptomic results of lung tissues with protein-protein interaction (PPI) expansion. Using KEGG pathway enrichment, an I-T-P network was established to determine the essential interactions among ingredients, targets, and pathways of ZTOI against lung inflammation in ALI. Molecular docking and immunofluorescence staining were utilized to confirm the accuracy of the I-T-P network. RESULTS: A total of 11 sesquiterpenes, whose target profiles may characterize the potential function of ZTOI, were identified as key ingredients. In the ALI rat model, ZTOI can alleviate lung inflammation by decreasing the levels of C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, interleukin-1ß, and tumor necrosis factor α both in serum and lung tissues. Based on our biological samples, transcriptomics, PPI network expansion, and KEGG pathway enrichment, 11 ingredients, 174 targets, and 8 signaling pathways were linked in the I-T-P networks. From these results, ZTOI could be inferred to exert multiple anti-inflammatory effects against ALI through Toll-like receptor, NF-kappa B, RIG-I-like receptor, TNF, NOD-like receptor, IL-17, MAPK, and the Toll and Imd signaling pathways. In addition, two significantly regulated targets in the transcriptome, Usp18 and Map3k7, could be the essential anti-inflammatory targets of ZTOI. CONCLUSION: By integrating network pharmacology with ingredient identification and transcriptomics, we show the multiple anti-inflammatory mechanisms by which ZTOI acts against ALI on an I-T-P level. This work also provides a methodological reference for related research into TCM.

The effect of anti-TNF on renal function in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Biologicals, such as anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF), reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Impaired renal function is a known predictor of CVD and elevated in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of anti-TNF on renal function in patients with AS and whether anti-TNF use is safe in AS patients with pre-existing risk factors for renal decline. METHOD: Biological-naïve consecutive AS patients treated with etanercept or adalimumab were prospectively followed from 2005 to 2014. Renal function was determined by calculation of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), estimated with the abbreviated modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula. The effect of anti-TNF on eGFR was analyzed using mixed model analysis. RESULTS: 211 AS patients were followed for a median of 156 (36-286) weeks. Overall mixed model analyses showed a significant decrease of eGFR over time (ß = - 0.040, p = 0.000), although this association did not remain significant after adjustment for responding to anti-TNF, alcohol use, disease duration, body mass index (BMI), C-reactive protein (CRP), and disease activity (ß = - 0.018, p = 0.094). However, patients with pre-existing risk factors for renal decline did have a significant change in eGFR over time (ß = - 0.029, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant change in eGFR over time, although this small decrease was not clinically relevant. This study further demonstrates that anti-TNF does not affect renal function in AS patients with and without existing risk factors for renal decline, which means that use of anti-TNF is safe concerning renal function in patients with AS. Key Points • Previous studies showed that biologicals, such as anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF), reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases, such as ankylosing spondylitis (AS). • Impaired renal function is a known predictor of CVD, and also a known concern for many AS patients. • Use of anti-TNF is safe with regard to renal function in patients with AS. • The effect of anti-TNF on CVD in AS patients does not seem to be mediated by changes in renal function.

First-line biologic therapy with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for psoriatic arthritis: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects multiple joints. It is associated with psoriasis and treated with synthetic and biologic drugs. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the outcomes of patients who received biologic therapy with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in terms of effectiveness, safety, functionality, and quality of life. DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective observational study was performed at a single center in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. METHODS: Patients with PsA who received their first TNF inhibitor treatment were followed up for 12 months. Disease activity was measured using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). Functionality was measured using the Health Questionnaire Assessment (HAQ), and quality of life was evaluated using the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions (EQ-5D). Multiple linear regression was used to identify predictors of the clinical response at 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients treated with adalimumab or etanercept were evaluated. Most of the clinical measures were significantly improved at 12 months. However, 31%-51% of the patients did not achieve good clinical control. No differences were observed between adalimumab and etanercept, except for poor functionality at 12 months among patients treated with etanercept. The main predictors of a worse clinical response were female sex, etanercept use, poor functionality, or lower quality of life at baseline. The main adverse reactions were alopecia, headache, injection site reaction, sinusitis, flu, dyslipidemia, and infections. CONCLUSION: TNF inhibitor therapy was effective and safe. However, despite improvements in clinical measures, most patients did not achieve satisfactory control of the disease.

Rapid improvement in severe long COVID following perispinal etanercept.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to describe the neurological improvements in a patient with severe long COVID brain dysfunction following perispinal etanercept administration. Perispinal administration of etanercept, a novel method designed to enhance its brain delivery via carriage in the cerebrospinal venous system, has previously been shown to reduce chronic neurological dysfunction after stroke. Etanercept is a recombinant biologic that is capable of ameliorating two components of neuroinflammation: microglial activation and the excess bioactivity of tumor necrosis factor (TNF), a proinflammatory cytokine that is a key neuromodulator in the brain. Optimal synaptic and brain network function require physiological levels of TNF. Neuroinflammation, including brain microglial activation and excess central TNF, can be a consequence of stroke or peripheral infection, including infection by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes COVID-19. METHODS: Standardized, validated measures, including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Beck Depression Index-II (BDI-II), Fatigue Assessment Scale, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Trail Making Tests, Timed Finger-to-Nose Test, 20 m Self-Paced Walk Test, 5 Times Sit-to-Stand Test and Grip Strength measured with a Jamar Dynamometer were used to quantitate changes in cognition, depression, fatigue and neurological function after a single 25 mg perispinal etanercept dose in a patient with severe long COVID of 12 months duration. RESULTS: Following perispinal etanercept administration there was immediate neurological improvement. At 24 h, there were remarkable reductions in chronic post-COVID-19 fatigue and depression, and significant measurable improvements in cognition, executive function, phonemic verbal fluency, balance, gait, upper limb coordination and grip strength. Cognition, depression and fatigue were examined at 29 days; each remained substantially improved. CONCLUSION: Perispinal etanercept is a promising treatment for the chronic neurologic dysfunction that may persist after resolution of acute COVID-19, including chronic cognitive dysfunction, fatigue, and depression. These results suggest that long COVID brain neuroinflammation is a potentially reversible pathology and viable treatment target. In view of the increasing unmet medical need, clinical trials of perispinal etanercept for long COVID are urgently necessary. The robust results of the present case suggest that perispinal etanercept clinical trials studying long COVID populations with severe fatigue, depression and cognitive dysfunction may have improved ability to detect a treatment effect. Positron emission tomographic methods that image brain microglial activation and measurements of cerebrospinal fluid proinflammatory cytokines may be useful for patient selection and correlation with treatment effects, as well as provide insight into the underlying pathophysiology.

Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Therapy and Hypoglycemia: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: An association between tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors and hypoglycemia has been detected in a few case reports and small case series; however, no relevant pharmacovigilance data have been published yet. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to detect and characterize relevant safety signals between hypoglycemia and TNF-α inhibitor use. METHODS: Indication-focused disproportionality analysis was conducted to detect increased reporting of TNF-α-associated hypoglycemia compared with all other reports with the same indication during the same time period. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to determine disproportionality. To reduce potential confounding factors, adjusted RORs were further calculated by logistic regression to control for age, sex, diabetes status, and concomitant drugs that potentially affect blood glucose levels. RESULTS: In all, 1086 adverse drug reactions related to TNF-α inhibitors were reported as 'hypoglycemia'. There were no disproportionality signals of hypoglycemia in TNF-α inhibitor users with indication of inflammatory bowel disease. When TNF-α inhibitors were considered as a class, disproportion for hypoglycemia only emerged in indication of psoriasis (n = 267, ROR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02-1.41). In further analyses of specific TNF-α inhibitor type, significant RORs for hypoglycemia were found in indication of rheumatic disease, including adalimumab in ankylosing spondylitis (n = 37, ROR 1.97, 95% CI 1.28-3.04), psoriasis (n = 160, ROR 1.64, 95% CI 1.37-1.97), and rheumatoid arthritis (n = 230, ROR 1.35, 95% CI 1.16-1.56) and infliximab in psoriasis (n = 18, ROR 2.14, 95% CI 1.33-3.42). After adjusting for confounding factors, only the signals of adalimumab were stable. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified some potential pharmacovigilance signals between hypoglycemia and TNF-α inhibitors, which warrants further validation.

TNF-induced Lupus. A Case-Based Review.

Nowadays, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) inhibitors have revolutionised the treatment of inflammatory arthritides by demonstrating efficacy with an acceptable toxicity profile. However, autoimmune phenomena and clinical entities have been reported ranging from an isolated presence of autoantibodies to full-blown autoimmune diseases, including drug-induced lupus (DIL). Case Presentation: A 62-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to methotrexate and prednisone was treated with adalimumab (ADA). 4 months later, she presented acute cutaneous eruptions after sun exposure, positive ANA (1/640 fine speckled pattern), Ro (SSA) and anti- Smith (Sm) antibodies with no other clinical or laboratory abnormalities. The diagnosis of DIL was made, ADA was discontinued, and she was treated successfully with prednisone plus local calcineurin inhibitors. Conclusion: Thus, we review the literature for cases of DIL development in patients treated with TNFα inhibitors. Rheumatologists should be aware of the possible adverse events and the requirement of careful clinical evaluation and monitoring.

Anti-TNFα drug levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Knowledge of the levels of anti-TNFa drugs can modify treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA). OBJECTIVES: To compare the levels of anti-TNFa in patients with RA vs SpA, in different clinical situations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, observational study was conducted. Levels of anti-TNFa and the presence of anti-drug antibodies were measured in consecutively selected patients, using the ELISA technique. RESULTS: Fifty-three, 73 and 78 patients treated with infliximab, adalimumab and etanercept were studied, respectively. The median drug levels in patients using standard doses were infliximab 2.2 µg/mL (1.4-5.2), adalimumab 4.9 µg/mL (0.8-8.9) and etanercept 3.1 µg/mL (2.3-4.4). There were no differences in drug levels according to disease activity but we found differences in etanercept and infliximab levels according to DMARD use. CONCLUSIONS: Levels of anti-TNFa drugs will change with DMARD treatment.

Comparative risk of infections among real-world users of biologics for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: data from the German BIKER registry.

To examine whether treatment with interleukin (IL)-1-, IL-6-, tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα)-inhibitors or Abatacept is associated with an increased risk of common infections, infections requiring hospitalization (SAE) or opportunistic infections among real-world juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients. Furthermore, the influence of other patient-related covariates on the occurrence of infections was investigated. Patients diagnosed with JIA and treated with biologics were selected from the German BIKER registry. Incidence rates (IR) of infections per 100 person years were calculated and compared between the different cohorts. Using multivariate logistic regression, odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined for the influence of patient-related covariates (age, diagnosis, laboratory data, concomitant medication, JIA activity, comorbidities, and premedication) on the occurrence of infections. 3258 patients entered the analysis. A total of 3654 treatment episodes were distributed among TNFα- (Etanercept, Adalimumab, Golimumab, Infliximab, n = 3044), IL-1- (Anakinra, Canakinumab, n = 105), IL-6- (Tocilizumab, n = 400) and T-cell activation inhibitors (Abatacept, n = 105). 813 (22.2%) patients had at least one infection, 103 (2.8%) patients suffered from an SAE infection. Both common and SAE infections were significantly more frequent in IL-1 (IR 17.3, 95% CI 12.5/24 and IR 4.3, 95% CI 2.3/8.3) and IL-6 cohort (IR 16.7, 95% CI 13.9/20 and IR 2.8, 95% CI 1.8/4.4) compared to TNFα-inhibitor cohort (IR 8.7, 95% CI 8.1/9.4 and IR 1, 95% CI 0.8/1.3). When comparing the influencing factors for various infectious diseases, the use of corticosteroids, younger age, cardiac comorbidities and higher JIA-activity are the most striking risk factors. Relative to TNFα inhibitors and Abatacept, IL-1 and IL-6 inhibitors were associated with an increased risk of common and SAE infections. The influencing covariates identified may be helpful for the choice of a suitable biologic to treat JIA.

First-in-human phase 1 study of MK-1248, an anti-glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor agonist monoclonal antibody, as monotherapy or with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Ligation of glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor (GITR) decreases regulatory T cell-mediated suppression and enhances T-cell proliferation, effector function, and survival. MK-1248 is a humanized immunoglobulin G4 anti-GITR monoclonal antibody agonist. METHODS: In patients with advanced solid tumors, MK-1248 (starting dose, 0.12 mg) was tested alone and with pembrolizumab (200 mg) according to a 3 + 3 dose escalation design (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02553499); both treatments were administered intravenously every 3 weeks for ≤4 and ≤35 cycles, respectively. The safety and tolerability, maximum tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics were explored. RESULTS: Twenty patients received MK-1248 monotherapy; 17 received combination therapy. The most frequent tumor types were colorectal cancer (n = 8), melanoma (n = 6), and renal cell carcinoma (n = 4). MK-1248 was generally well tolerated at the maximum tested doses of 170 (monotherapy) and 60 mg (combination). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) or treatment-related deaths occurred. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 36 of the 37 patients (97%); the most common were vomiting (n = 13 [35%]), anemia (n = 10 [27%]), and decreased appetite (n = 10 [27%]). Grade 3 to 5 AEs occurred in 19 of the 37 patients (51%). Treatment-related AEs occurred in 18 of the 37 patients (49%): 9 of the 20 patients (45%) on monotherapy and 9 of the 17 patients (53%) on combination therapy. Among the 17 patients receiving combination therapy, 1 achieved a complete response and 2 achieved a partial response, for an objective response rate of 18%; no patients achieved an objective response with monotherapy. The disease control rate (stable disease or better) was 15% with monotherapy and 41% with combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: MK-1248 was generally well tolerated at doses up to 170 (monotherapy) and 60 mg (combination), with no DLTs or treatment-related deaths. Combination therapy provided limited antitumor responses.

Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Treatment With Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor α Drugs in a Cohort of Colombian Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical response at 24 months and evaluate the adverse events (AEs) of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with etanercept 50 (injectable solution 50 mg prefilled syringe), etanercept 25 (lyophilized 25 mg), infliximab, adalimumab, or golimumab. METHODS: A cohort study was carried out in patients with RA, in treatment with etanercept (injectable solution 50 mg prefilled syringe or lyophilized 25 mg), infliximab, adalimumab, or golimumab. Duration of study: follow-up was carried out for 24 months. The difference of initial and final 28-joint Disease Activity Score, remission incidence, difference of initial and final Health Assessment Questionnaire score, disability recovery, and AE rate were evaluated. RESULTS: The study enrolled 435 patients (108 adalimumab, 107 infliximab, 92 etanercept 25 mg, 81 etanercept 50 mg, and 47 golimumab). For etanercept 50, the median difference between basal and at the end of follow-up 28-joint Disease Activity Score was 1.7. For golimumab, it was 1.4; for adalimumab, it was 1.1; for etanercept 25, it was 1.02; and for infliximab, it was 0.96 (p = 0.001). The median difference between basal and final Health Assessment Questionnaire ranged was 1.66 for etanercept 50, 1.34 for etanercept 25, 1.3 for golimumab, 1.24 for adalimumab, and 1.07 for infliximab (p = 0.0005). Comparatively, etanercept 50 presented the highest cumulative incidence (77%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 67%-86%) and remission incidence (64 cases per 100 person-months; 95% CI, 4.9-8.1 cases per 100 person-months) and the lowest AE rate (8.6 per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 5.3-15 per 100 person-years). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RA treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor α drugs, the highest incidence of remission and the lowest rate of AEs were documented for the cohort exposed to etanercept 50 mg.

Safety, Tolerability, and Potential Clinical Activity of a Glucocorticoid-Induced TNF Receptor-Related Protein Agonist Alone or in Combination With Nivolumab for Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: A Phase 1/2a Dose-Escalation and Cohort-Expansion Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Multiple immunostimulatory agonist antibodies have been clinically tested in solid tumors to evaluate the role of targeting glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-related protein in anticancer treatments. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and activity of the fully human glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor-related protein agonist IgG1 monoclonal antibody BMS-986156 with or without nivolumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This global, open-label, phase 1/2a study of BMS-986156 with or without nivolumab enrolled 292 patients 18 years or older with advanced solid tumors and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or less. Prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy was allowed. Monotherapy and combination dose-escalation cohorts ran concurrently to guide expansion doses beginning October 16, 2015; the study is ongoing. INTERVENTIONS: The protein agonist BMS-986156 was administered intravenously at a dose of 10, 30, 100, 240, or 800 mg every 2 weeks as monotherapy, and in the combination group 30, 100, 240, or 800 mg plus 240 mg of nivolumab every 2 weeks; same-dose cohorts were pooled for analysis. One cohort also received 480 mg of BMS-986156 plus 480 mg of nivolumab every 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end points were safety, tolerability, and dose-limiting toxic effects. Additional end points included antitumor activity per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, and exploratory biomarker analyses. RESULTS: With a follow-up range of 1.4 to 101.7 weeks (follow-up ongoing), 34 patients (16 women and 18 men; median age, 56.6 years [range, 28-75 years]) received monotherapy (4 patients completed initial treatment), and 258 patients (140 women and 118 men; median age, 60 years [range, 21-87 years]) received combination therapy (65 patients completed initial treatment). No grade 3 to 5 treatment-related adverse events occurred with BMS-986156 monotherapy; grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 24 patients (9.3%) receiving BMS-986156 plus nivolumab, with no grade 5 treatment-related adverse events. One dose-limiting toxic effect (grade 4 elevated creatine phosphokinase levels) occurred in a patient receiving 800 mg of BMS-986156 plus 240 mg of nivolumab every 2 weeks; BMS-986156 with or without nivolumab exhibited linear pharmacokinetics with dose-related increase after a single dose. Peripheral T-cell and natural killer-cell proliferation increased after administration of BMS-986156 with or without nivolumab. No consistent and significant modulation of intratumoral CD8+ T cells and FoxP3+ regulatory T cells was observed. No responses were seen with BMS-986156 alone; objective response rates ranged from 0% to 11.1% (1 of 9) across combination therapy cohorts, with a few responses observed in patients previously treated with anti-programmed death receptor (ligand) 1 therapy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Based on this cohort, BMS-986156 appears to have had a manageable safety profile, and BMS-986156 plus nivolumab demonstrated safety and efficacy comparable to historical data reported for nivolumab monotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02598960.

Down-titration and discontinuation strategies of tumour necrosis factor-blocking agents for rheumatoid arthritis in patients with low disease activity.

BACKGROUND: Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents are effective in treating people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but are associated with (dose-dependent) adverse effects and high costs. To prevent overtreatment, several trials have assessed the effectiveness of down-titration compared with continuation of the standard dose. This is an update of a Cochrane Review published in 2014. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of down-titration (dose reduction, discontinuation, or disease activity-guided dose tapering) of anti-TNF agents on disease activity, functioning, costs, safety, and radiographic damage compared with usual care in people with RA and low disease activity. SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and CENTRAL (29 March 2018) and four trial registries (11 April 2018) together with reference checking, citation searching, and contact with study authors to identify additional studies. We screened conference proceedings (American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism 2005-2017). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing down-titration (dose reduction, discontinuation, disease activity-guided dose tapering) of anti-TNF agents (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab) to usual care/no down-titration in people with RA and low disease activity. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodology. MAIN RESULTS: One previously included trial was excluded retrospectively in this update because it was not an RCT/CCT. We included eight additional trials, for a total of 14 studies (13 RCTs and one CCT, 3315 participants in total) reporting anti-TNF down-titration. Six studies (1148 participants) reported anti-TNF dose reduction compared with anti-TNF continuation. Eight studies (2111 participants) reported anti-TNF discontinuation compared with anti-TNF continuation (three studies assessed both anti-TNF discontinuation and dose reduction), and three studies assessed disease activity-guided anti-TNF dose tapering (365 participants). These studies included data on all anti-TNF agents, but primarily adalimumab and etanercept. Thirteen studies were available in full text, one was available as abstract. We assessed the included studies generally at low to moderate risk of bias; our main concerns were bias due to open-label treatment and unblinded outcome assessment. Clinical heterogeneity between the trials was high. The included studies were performed at clinical centres around the world and included people with early as well as established RA, the majority of whom were female with mean ages between 47 and 60. Study durations ranged from 6 months to 3.5 years.We found that anti-TNF dose reduction leads to little or no difference in mean disease activity score (DAS28) after 26 to 52 weeks (high-certainty evidence, mean difference (MD) 0.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.11 to 0.24, absolute risk difference (ARD) 1%) compared with continuation. Also, anti-TNF dose reduction does not result in an important deterioration in function after 26 to 52 weeks (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)) (high-certainty evidence, MD 0.09, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.19, ARD 3%). Next to this, anti-TNF dose reduction may slightly reduce the proportion of participants switched to another biologic (low-certainty evidence), but probably slightly increases the proportion of participants with minimal radiographic progression after 52 weeks (moderate-certainty evidence, risk ratio (RR) 1.22, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.95, ARD 2% higher). Anti-TNF dose reduction may cause little or no difference in serious adverse events, withdrawals due to adverse events and proportion of participants with persistent remission (low-certainty evidence).Results show that anti-TNF discontinuation probably slightly increases the mean disease activity score (DAS28) after 28 to 52 weeks (moderate-certainty evidence, MD 0.96, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.25, ARD 14%), and that the RR of persistent remission lies between 0.16 and 0.77 (low-certainty evidence). Anti-TNF discontinuation increases the proportion participants with minimal radiographic progression after 52 weeks (high-certainty evidence, RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.59, ARD 7%) and may lead to a slight deterioration in function (HAQ-DI) (low-certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether anti-TNF discontinuation influences the number of serious adverse events (due to very low-certainty evidence) and the number of withdrawals due to adverse events after 28 to 52 weeks probably increases slightly (moderate-certainty evidence, RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.84, ARD 1% higher).Anti-TNF disease activity-guided dose tapering may result in little or no difference in mean disease activity score (DAS28) after 72 to 78 weeks (low-certainty evidence). Furthermore, anti-TNF disease activity-guided dose tapering results in little or no difference in the proportion of participants with persistent remission after 18 months (high-certainty evidence, RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.06, ARD -9%) and may result in little or no difference in switching to another biologic (low-certainty evidence). Anti-TNF disease activity-guided dose tapering may slightly increase proportion of participants with minimal radiographic progression (low-certainty evidence) and probably leads to a slight deterioration of function after 18 months (moderate-certainty evidence, MD 0.2 higher, 0.02 lower to 0.42 higher, ARD 7% higher), It is uncertain whether anti-TNF disease activity-guided dose tapering influences the number of serious adverse events due to very low-certainty evidence. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found that fixed-dose reduction of anti-TNF, after at least three to 12 months of low disease activity, is comparable to continuation of the standard dose regarding disease activity and function, and may be comparable with regards to the proportion of participants with persistent remission. Discontinuation (also without disease activity-guided adaptation) of anti-TNF is probably inferior to continuation of treatment with respect to disease activity, the proportion of participants with persistent remission, function, and minimal radiographic damage. Disease activity-guided dose tapering of anti-TNF is comparable to continuation of treatment with respect to the proportion of participants with persistent remission and may be comparable regarding disease activity.Caveats of this review are that available data are mainly limited to etanercept and adalimumab, the heterogeneity between studies, and the use of superiority instead of non-inferiority designs.Future research should focus on the anti-TNF agents infliximab and golimumab; assessment of disease activity, function, and radiographic outcomes after longer follow-up; and assessment of long-term safety, cost-effectiveness, and predictors for successful down-titration. Also, use of a validated flare criterion, non-inferiority designs, and disease activity-guided tapering instead of fixed-dose reduction or discontinuation would allow researchers to better interpret study findings and generalise to clinical practice.