Single- and repeated-dose toxicity study of bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept in ARPE-19 cells under normal and oxidative stress conditions.

We assessed the effect of single and repeated doses of bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept on cell viability, proliferation, permeability, and apoptosis of ARPE-19 cells. MTT and BrdU assays were used to determine viability and proliferation after single or repeated doses of anti-VEGF drugs under normal and oxidative stress conditions. Caspase-3 expression after single and repeated doses of the 3 drugs was assessed using immunofluorescence. Transepithelial-electrical-resistance (TER) was measured to study the effect of anti-VEGFs on retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) permeability under normal and oxidative stress conditions. Flow cytometry was used to detect intracellular accumulation of the drugs. Finally, a wound healing assay was performed to investigate the effect of the drugs on RPE cell migration. Single and multiple doses of anti-VEGF drugs had no effect on cell viability and proliferation. The oxidative effect of H2O2 decreased cell viability and proliferation; however, no difference was observed between anti-VEGF treatments. Immunofluorescence performed after single and repeated doses of the drugs revealed some caspase-3 expression. Interestingly, anti-VEGFs restored the increased permeability induced by H2O2. The 3 drugs accumulated inside the cells and were detectable 5 days after treatment. Finally, none of the drugs affected migration. In conclusion, no measureable toxic effect was observed after single or repeated doses of VEGF antagonists under normal and oxidative stress. Intracellular accumulation of the drugs does not seem to be toxic or affect cell functions. Our study suggests that anti-VEGFs could have a preventive effect on the maintenance of the RPE barrier under oxidative stress.

Preclinical investigations of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To investigate the retinal safety of intravitreal (IVT) ziv-aflibercept in rabbits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen rabbits were given an IVT injection of ziv-aflibercept (25 mg/mL) or aflibercept (40 mg/mL) and examined by funduscopy, electroretinography (ERG), optical coherence tomography (OCT), light microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Serum, aqueous, and vitreous were obtained afterward for osmolarity analysis. The effect of ziv-aflibercept on human retinal cultured cells (ARPE-19) was assessed by the MTT cell viability assay. RESULTS: All eyes showed normal funduscopy, OCT, and ERG findings at baseline and 24 hours or 7 days after the procedure. Median baseline serum, vitreous, and aqueous osmolarity remained unchanged. Histology and TEM showed no major anatomic signs of toxicity. No cytotoxic effect was observed in ARPE-19 cells exposed to ziv-aflibercept. CONCLUSION: IVT injection ziv-aflibercept at a concentration of 25 mg/mL proved to be safe for the rabbit retina.

Effects of aflibercept on primary RPE cells: toxicity, wound healing, uptake and phagocytosis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Anti-VEGF treatment is the therapy of choice in age-related macular degeneration, and is also applied in diabetic macular oedema or retinal vein occlusion. Recently, the fusion protein, aflibercept, has been approved for therapeutic use. In this study, we investigate the effects of aflibercept on primary RPE cells. METHODS: Primary RPE cells were prepared from freshly slaughtered pigs' eyes. The impact of aflibercept on cell viability was investigated with MTT and trypan blue exclusion assay. The influence of aflibercept on wound healing was assessed with a scratch assay. Intracellular uptake of aflibercept was investigated in immunohistochemistry and its influence on phagocytosis with a phagocytosis assay using opsonised latex beads. RESULTS: Aflibercept displays no cytotoxicity on RPE cells but impairs its wound healing ability. It is taken up into RPE cells and can be intracellularly detected for at least 7 days. Intracellular aflibercept impairs the phagocytic capacity of RPE cells. CONCLUSIONS: Aflibercept interferes with the physiology of RPE cells, as it is taken up into RPE cells, which is accompanied by a reduction of the phagocytic ability. Additionally, it impairs the wound healing capacity of RPE cells. These effects on the physiology of RPE cells may indicate possible side effects.

Electrophysiological toxicity testing of VEGF Trap-Eye in an isolated perfused vertebrate retina organ culture model.

PURPOSE: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of visual impairment in Western nations. Since the discovery of the importance of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the pathogenesis of neovascular AMD, anti-VEGF agents including pegaptanib, ranibizumab and bevacizumab provide a treatment option to improve vision in affected persons. VEGF Trap-Eye (Aflibercept) is a new agent available for the treatment of exudative AMD. The molecule is a receptor decoy with a longer half-life and a higher affinity to VEGF compared with ranibizumab or bevacizumab. The presented study has been designed to evaluate the short-term toxic effects of VEGF Trap-Eye on retinal function during and after direct exposure to the drug. METHODS: Isolated bovine retinas were perfused with an oxygen-saturated nutrient solution, and the electroretinogram (ERG) was recorded using silver/silver chloride electrodes. A total of 0.5 mg or 2 mg VEGF Trap-Eye was added to the nutrient solution and retinas were exposed for 45 min, followed by a washout period of 100 min. The percentage of a- and b-wave reduction at the end of the washout was compared with the baseline values. Additionally, retinal whole mount cultures were exposed for 24 hr to VEGF Trap-Eye, and the amount of apoptotic cells were determined using the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated uridine 5'-triphosphate-biotin nick end labelling (TUNEL) assay. RESULTS: During simulation of intraocular application, no significant reduction in the a-wave amplitude for 0.5 mg (2.70%, p = 0.37) and 2 mg (3.84%, p = 0.37) VEGF Trap-Eye and b-wave amplitude for 0.5 mg (19.68%, p = 0.17) and 2 mg (24.1%, p = 0.06) VEGF Trap-Eye was observed at the end of the washout. However, there were significant changes in a-wave and b-wave amplitudes directly after exposure to 0.5 mg VEGF Trap-Eye (18.4%, p = 0.004 and 43.1%, p = 0.006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The presented data suggest that intraocular application of up to 2 mg VEGF Trap-Eye does not induce irreversible toxic retinal damage. However, short-term results showed a negative effect directly after the application for 0.5 mg and 2 mg VEGF Trap-Eye.

Comparative toxicity and proliferation testing of aflibercept, bevacizumab and ranibizumab on different ocular cells.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key factor in the pathogenesis of neovascular retinal diseases including age-related macular degeneration. VEGF inhibitors including ranibizumab, pegaptanib or bevacizumab improve retinal morphology and vision in many patients. The recently approved drug aflibercept (VEGF Trap-Eye/Eyelea, Regeneron, Tarrytown, New York, USA) offers a new therapy modality. We therefore tested for toxic and anti-proliferating effects of aflibercept. METHODS: The effects of aflibercept (0.125, 0.5, 2 mg), ranibizumab (0.125 mg) and bevacizumab (0.3125 mg) after 1, 24, 48 and 72 h on cell morphology via phase contrast pictures, cell viability via MTS assay, total cell amount via crystal violet staining, apoptosis induction via caspase 3/7 assay and proliferation via BrdU assay were investigated. Three ocular cell lines were chosen for toxicology testing: ARPE19 cells, RGC-5 cells and 661W cells. RESULTS: Aflibercept did not cause changes in cell morphology, induce apoptosis or cause permanent decrease in cell viability, cell density or proliferation in any cell line or concentration investigated. In general, aflibercept had fewer effects (upregulation or downregulation) compared with controls than bevacizumab or ranibizumab. CONCLUSIONS: In our experiments, aflibercept did not lead to any negative effects on retinal cell lines and might therefore be used safely in clinical applications.