Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 102
Filtrar
1.
Thromb Haemost ; 122(3): 329-335, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34875702

RESUMEN

Patients on anticoagulant treatment are constantly increasing, with an estimated prevalence in Italy of 2% of the total population. About a quarter of the anticoagulated patients require temporary cessation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or vitamin K antagonists for a planned intervention within 2 years from anticoagulation inception. Several clinical issues about DOAC interruption remain unanswered: many questions are tentatively addressed daily by thousands of physicians worldwide through an experience-based balancing of thrombotic and bleeding risks. Among possible valuable answers, the Italian Federation of Centers for the diagnosis of thrombotic disorders and the Surveillance of the Antithrombotic therapies (FCSA) proposes some experience-based suggestions and expert opinions. In particular, FCSA provides practical guidance on the following issues: (1) multiparametric assessment of thrombotic and bleeding risks based on patients' individual and surgical risk factor, (2) testing of prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and DOAC plasma levels before surgery or invasive procedure, (3) use of heparin, (4) restarting of full-dose DOAC after high risk bleeding surgery, (5) practical nonpharmacological suggestions to manage patients perioperatively. Finally, FCSA suggests creating a multidisciplinary "anticoagulation team" with the aim to define the optimal perioperative management of anticoagulation.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Antitrombinas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/efectos adversos , Pruebas Hematológicas/métodos , Hemorragia Posoperatoria , Trombosis , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Antitrombinas/administración & dosificación , Antitrombinas/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Humanos , Italia , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/métodos , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Atención Perioperativa/normas , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/etiología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Ajuste de Riesgo/métodos , Ajuste de Riesgo/organización & administración , Trombosis/diagnóstico , Trombosis/prevención & control , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inhibidores
3.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(26): e26509, 2021 Jul 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34190181

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Medical diagnosis and therapy often rely on laboratory testing. We observed mistaken testing in evaluations for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) that led to delays and adverse outcomes. Physicians were mistakenly ordering interleukin-2 and quantitative natural killer cell flow cytometry, rather than soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL2R) or qualitative natural killer functional tests in the evaluation of patients suspected to have HLH.We initiated a prospective quality improvement project to reduce mistaken testing, reduce delays in correct testing due to mistaken ordering, and improve HLH evaluations. This consisted of provider education, developing an evaluation algorithm, and ultimately required systems interventions such as pop-ups and removal of the mistaken tests from the electronic ordering catalog.Active education reduced mistaken testing significantly in HLH evaluations from baseline (73.3% vs 33.3%, P = .003, relative risk reduction (RRR) 54.5%), but failed to meet the pre-specified RRR cutoff for success (70%). Education alone did not significantly reduce the proportion of HLH evaluations with delays in sIL2R testing (23.3% vs 7.4%, P = .096). Mistaken testing increased after the active intervention ended (33.3% vs 43.5%, P = .390, with RRR 40.7% from baseline. Mistaken test removal was successful: mistaken testing dropped to 0% (P < .001, RRR 100%), saved $14,235 yearly, eliminated delays in sIL2R testing from mistaken testing (23.3% vs 0%, P = .008), and expedited sIL2R testing after admission for HLH symptoms (14.6 days vs 3.8 days, P = .0012). These data show systems controls are highly effective in quality improvement while education has moderate efficacy.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Laboratorio Clínico/normas , Errores Diagnósticos , Linfohistiocitosis Hemofagocítica/diagnóstico , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Errores Diagnósticos/prevención & control , Errores Diagnósticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Necesidades , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Ajuste de Riesgo/métodos , Ajuste de Riesgo/organización & administración , Desarrollo de Personal/métodos , Desarrollo de Personal/organización & administración , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
Acta Med Indones ; 53(1): 1-4, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33818400

RESUMEN

It has been a year since the Indonesian government announced its first COVID-19 identified in Jakarta. Since then, there have been more than 900,000 cases in Indonesia with case fatality rate (CFR) of 2.9%. The number of new cases per day is now ranging from 9,000 cases to almost 13,000 cases. Not only in Indonesia, but the number of new cases along with the mortality rate in other countries, such as Malaysia, Japan, United States, and Europe region also increased dramatically. COVID-19 vaccines are being investigated and the world hopes that vaccines will be the answer to tackle this pandemic. Is it really so? Immunization is an effort to induce immunity in individuals to prevent a disease or the complication related to the diseases that may be catastrophic. Immunization can be divided into passive, which is by giving certain type of antibody and active, which means that either we get the disease, or we get the antigen injected into our body.Having prior vaccination or past COVID-19 does not mean that someone is totally immune to COVID-19 as a recent study suggested that the antibody related to COVID-19 past infection is significantly decreasing after 3 months post-infection. Compliance to implementation of health protocol remained the most crucial strategy during this pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Fragilidad , Ajuste de Riesgo , Vacunación , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Femenino , Anciano Frágil/estadística & datos numéricos , Fragilidad/diagnóstico , Fragilidad/epidemiología , Evaluación Geriátrica , Humanos , Indonesia/epidemiología , Masculino , Ajuste de Riesgo/métodos , Ajuste de Riesgo/organización & administración , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Seroconversión , Vacunación/métodos , Vacunación/normas , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
Am Heart J ; 236: 22-36, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33636136

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Individuals with congenital heart defects (CHDs) are recommended to receive all inpatient cardiac and noncardiac care at facilities that can offer specialized care. We describe geographic accessibility to such centers in New York State and determine several factors associated with receiving care there. METHODS: We used inpatient hospitalization data from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) in New York State 2008-2013. In the absence of specific adult CHD care center designations during our study period, we identified pediatric/adult and adult-only cardiac surgery centers through the Cardiac Surgery Reporting System to estimate age-based specialized care. We calculated one-way drive and public transit time (in minutes) from residential address to centers using R gmapsdistance package and the Google Maps Distance Application Programming Interface (API). We calculated prevalence ratios using modified Poisson regression with model-based standard errors, fit with generalized estimating equations clustered at the hospital level and subclustered at the individual level. RESULTS: Individuals with CHDs were more likely to seek care at pediatric/adult or adult-only cardiac surgery centers if they had severe CHDs, private health insurance, higher severity of illness at encounter, a surgical procedure, cardiac encounter, and shorter drive time. These findings can be used to increase care receipt (especially for noncardiac care) at pediatric/adult or adult-only cardiac surgery centers, identify areas with limited access, and reduce disparities in access to specialized care among this high-risk population.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Cardiopatías Congénitas , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Manejo de Atención al Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Cardiopatías Congénitas/epidemiología , Cardiopatías Congénitas/terapia , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , New York/epidemiología , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/métodos , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Ajuste de Riesgo/organización & administración , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
7.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 22(6): 478-485, 2021 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33136815

RESUMEN

AIMS: Clinical management of patients more than 1 year after acute myocardial infarction (MI) is challenging. Patient risk stratification may help to establish therapeutic priorities. We aimed to describe the comprehensive risk profile and management of patients with prior MI. METHODS: We analyzed data from the EYESHOT Post-MI study, which evaluated the management of patients 1-3 years after MI. The risk profile of participants was defined according to the qualifying high-risk features of the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial (history of diabetes, history of recurrent MI, angiographic evidence of multivessel coronary disease, chronic kidney disease with estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min, age ≥65 years). Patients were classified into five subgroups according to the presence of zero, one, two, three, or more than three features. RESULTS: Of the 1633 patients in the EYESHOT Post-MI study, 1008 could be stratified according to PEGASUS-TIMI 54 high-risk features. About 22% of patients had no high-risk features, whereas 25% showed at least three features. The prevalence of patients with specific clinical severity indicators was progressively higher with the increasing number of high-risk features. Dual antiplatelet therapy and oral anticoagulation were more frequently used in patients with an increasing number of high-risk features (P for trend <0.0001). Lipid-lowering therapies were less frequently prescribed in patients with a higher number of features (P for trend 0.006 for statins; P for trend 0.007 for ezetimibe). CONCLUSION: Higher-risk post-MI patients, identified by PEGASUS-TIMI 54 high-risk features, showed an increased prevalence of major clinical severity indicators. Secondary prevention therapies were not adequately implemented in higher-risk patients.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Infarto del Miocardio , Ajuste de Riesgo , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Prevención Secundaria , Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Femenino , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Ajuste de Riesgo/métodos , Ajuste de Riesgo/organización & administración , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Prevención Secundaria/normas , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
8.
Cardiol Clin ; 39(1): 33-54, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33222813

RESUMEN

Cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular disease-related disorders remain among the most common causes of maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States. Due to increased rates of obesity, delayed childbearing, and improvements in medical technology, greater numbers of women are entering pregnancy with preexisting medical comorbidities. Use of cardiovascular medications in pregnancy continues to increase, and medical management of cardiovascular conditions in pregnancy will become increasingly common. Obstetricians and cardiologists must familiarize themselves with the pharmacokinetics of the most commonly used cardiovascular medications in pregnancy and how these medications respond to the physiologic changes related to pregnancy, embryogenesis, and lactation.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Cardiovasculares/farmacología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Ajuste de Riesgo , Femenino , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Humanos , Embarazo , Ajuste de Riesgo/métodos , Ajuste de Riesgo/organización & administración
9.
Cardiol Clin ; 39(1): 55-65, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33222814

RESUMEN

Women with congenital heart disease are pursuing pregnancy in increasing numbers. Counseling about genetic transmission, medication management, maternal and fetal risks, and maternal longevity should be initiated well before pregnancy is considered. Although preconception medical and surgical optimization as well as coordinated multidisciplinary care throughout pregnancy decrease maternal and fetal risks, the rate of complications remains increased compared with the general population. Lesion-specific risk stratification and care throughout pregnancy further improve outcomes and decrease unnecessary interventions.


Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías Congénitas/terapia , Atención Preconceptiva/métodos , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/terapia , Ajuste de Riesgo/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Embarazo
11.
J Health Polit Policy Law ; 45(5): 801-816, 2020 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32589221

RESUMEN

The ACA created a new type of nonprofit health insurance entity, the "Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan" ("co-op"). Most of the newly created co-ops soon lost money, and only 4 of the original 23 remain. We interviewed key stakeholders and conducted in-depth case studies of 3 of these co-ops. We discovered that politicians and regulators made it unlikely the program could succeed, that most of the co-ops did not have the management capacity to overcome these political obstacles, and that even those with good managers lacked the needed fiscal resilience. We also considered lessons suggested for those proposing a newly created "public option." The main one is that a successful public option requires a supportive political environment, strong management, and significant fiscal capacity, none of which comes easily. A better route may be a quasi-public option in which the government subcontracts the operation of its newly created plan to a private firm. Although it is uncertain whether federal regulators have the capacity to hold such private for-profit firms accountable, pragmatism suggests that a combination of public-sector regulation and private-sector implementation may be the most direct path toward a US version of affordable universal coverage.


Asunto(s)
Implementación de Plan de Salud/organización & administración , Planes de Seguro sin Fines de Lucro/organización & administración , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/organización & administración , Implementación de Plan de Salud/economía , Humanos , Planes de Seguro sin Fines de Lucro/economía , Sector Privado , Sector Público , Ajuste de Riesgo/economía , Ajuste de Riesgo/organización & administración , Estados Unidos
12.
Dig Liver Dis ; 52(6): 606-612, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32386942

RESUMEN

A dramatic SARS-Cov-2 outbreak is hitting Italy hard. To face the new scenario all the hospitals have been re-organised in order to reduce all the outpatient services and to devote almost all their personnel and resources to the management of Covid-19 patients. As a matter of fact, all the services have undergone a deep re-organization guided by: the necessity to reduce exams, to create an environment that helps reduce the virus spread, and to preserve the medical personnel from infection. In these days a re-organization of the endoscopic unit, sited in a high-incidence area, has been adopted, with changes to logistics, work organization and patients selection. With the present manuscript, we want to support gastroenterologists and endoscopists in the organization of a "new" endoscopy unit that responds to the "new" scenario, while remaining fully aware that resources, availability and local circumstances may extremely vary from unit to unit.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Endoscopía/métodos , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales , Control de Infecciones , Pandemias , Manejo de Atención al Paciente , Neumonía Viral , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Italia/epidemiología , Innovación Organizacional , Pandemias/prevención & control , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/tendencias , Selección de Paciente , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Ajuste de Riesgo/métodos , Ajuste de Riesgo/organización & administración , SARS-CoV-2
14.
Postgrad Med J ; 96(1142): 742-746, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32047103

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We are currently faced with an increasing burden of cardiovascular disease in China and the inadequacy of the application of guidelines in clinical practice. In the past decade, China has been strengthening the healthcare system, but it still lacked a national performance measurement system and an appropriate quality improvement strategy. Therefore, in order to improve the implementation of guideline recommendations in clinical practice, China has learnt from the successful experience of Get With The Guidelines project in 2014. Under the guidance of the Medical and Health Hospital of the National Health and Family Planning Commission, the Chinese Society of Cardiology and the American Heart Association jointly launched the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China (CCC) project. The project team provided an analysis report on the completion of key medical quality evaluation indicators of each hospital every month, supplied guidance through education, training, experience exchange and on-site investigation for problems, and certified hospitals with outstanding performance and obvious progress. The circle pattern, including evaluation, training, improvement and re-evaluation, will boost the guidelines compliance on clinical practice in China and improve the quality of medical services. METHODS: This study was conducted in a centre of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. It included patients with ACS from December 2009 to December 2011 (n=225), patients with ACS in the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome project coming from the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (n=665), 12 hospitals in Hunan Province (n=4333) and 150 hospitals in China (n=63 641) from November 2014 to April 2017. It assessed the situation of drug therapy, hospitalisation day, mortality during hospitalisation, median of door-to-needle (D-to-N) time and median of door-to-balloon (D-to-B) time of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the proportion of D-to-N within 30 min and D-to-B within 90 min, and the proportion of reperfusion therapy. Patients with ACS from the centre from November 2014 to April 2017 were divided into five groups (every 6 months as a group according to time). The study observed change trends in all the above-mentioned indexes. RESULTS: Compared with before participating in the CCC project, there were increases after participating in the CCC project in the drug usage rates of aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel or ticagrelor), ß-blocker, statin and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB). Hospitalisation day and mortality during hospitalisation were shortened. D-to-N and D-to-B times of patients with STEMI were shorter. Compared with Hunan Province and China, the drug usage rates were higher; hospitalisation day and D-to-N time were shorter; D-to-B time was longer; and the proportion of reperfusion therapy was higher. The trend of drug usage rates was on the rise. There was no significant change in the hospitalisation day and D-to-N and D-to-B times. The mortality during hospitalisation showed a downward trend. The proportion of D-to-N within 90 min and reperfusion therapy showed upward trends. CONCLUSION: Quality of care for patients with ACS improved over time in the CCC project, including taking medicine following the guidelines, increased use of reperfusion therapy and faster time to treatment. Although overall mortality has improved, we also should attach importance to high-risk patients. The influence of the CCC project, which is based on guidelines on prognosis of ACS in the centre, presents an important clinical implication that it is necessary to enhance adherence to the guidelines in the treatment of ACS.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Reperfusión Miocárdica , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/epidemiología , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , China/epidemiología , Costo de Enfermedad , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reperfusión Miocárdica/métodos , Reperfusión Miocárdica/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pronóstico , Ajuste de Riesgo/métodos , Ajuste de Riesgo/organización & administración , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Tiempo de Tratamiento/normas , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos
15.
Gut ; 69(9): 1645-1658, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31953252

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance aims to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC). The 2002 UK surveillance guidelines define low-risk, intermediate-risk and high-risk groups, recommending different strategies for each. Evidence supporting the guidelines is limited. We examined CRC incidence and effects of surveillance on incidence among each risk group. DESIGN: Retrospective study of 33 011 patients who underwent colonoscopy with adenoma removal at 17 UK hospitals, mostly (87%) from 2000 to 2010. Patients were followed up through 2016. Cox regression with time-varying covariates was used to estimate effects of surveillance on CRC incidence adjusted for patient, procedural and polyp characteristics. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) compared incidence with that in the general population. RESULTS: After exclusions, 28 972 patients were available for analysis; 14 401 (50%) were classed as low-risk, 11 852 (41%) as intermediate-risk and 2719 (9%) as high-risk. Median follow-up was 9.3 years. In the low-risk, intermediate-risk and high-risk groups, CRC incidence per 100 000 person-years was 140 (95% CI 122 to 162), 221 (195 to 251) and 366 (295 to 453), respectively. CRC incidence was 40%-50% lower with a single surveillance visit than with none: hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.56 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.80), 0.59 (0.43 to 0.81) and 0.49 (0.29 to 0.82) in the low-risk, intermediate-risk and high-risk groups, respectively. Compared with the general population, CRC incidence without surveillance was similar among low-risk (SIR 0.86, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.02) and intermediate-risk (1.16, 0.97 to 1.37) patients, but higher among high-risk patients (1.91, 1.39 to 2.56). CONCLUSION: Postpolypectomy surveillance reduces CRC risk. However, even without surveillance, CRC risk in some low-risk and intermediate-risk patients is no higher than in the general population. These patients could be managed by screening rather than surveillance.


Asunto(s)
Adenoma , Neoplasias del Colon , Pólipos del Colon , Colonoscopía , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Ajuste de Riesgo , Adenoma/patología , Adenoma/cirugía , Anciano , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Pólipos del Colon/patología , Pólipos del Colon/cirugía , Colonoscopía/métodos , Colonoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ajuste de Riesgo/métodos , Ajuste de Riesgo/organización & administración , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Reino Unido/epidemiología
16.
Anaesthesia ; 75(5): 642-647, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31867710

RESUMEN

The efficient use of operating theatres requires accurate case scheduling. One common method is 'booking to the mean'. Here, the mean times for individual operations are summed to approximate the time allocated to the list. An alternative approach is 'probabilistic scheduling'. Here, the means and standard deviation of the individual case times are combined to estimate the probability that the planned list will finish on time. This study assessed how probabilistic booking would have changed list utilisation, over-running and case cancellations in 60 urology lists during eight months that had been 'booked to the mean'. Booking to the mean resulted in 53/60 (88%) lists over-running and correctly predicted the finish times in just 13% of lists. Out of 264 patients, 36 (14%) were cancelled on the day due to over-runs in 24/60 (40%) lists. In contrast, probabilistic scheduling correctly predicted an over-run or under-run in 77% of lists, which would have allowed the case mix to be adjusted to prevent cancellation and optimise utilisation.


Asunto(s)
Citas y Horarios , Modelos Estadísticos , Quirófanos/organización & administración , Planificación de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Eficiencia Organizacional , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Predicción , Humanos , Quirófanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Ajuste de Riesgo/organización & administración , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/estadística & datos numéricos
17.
Am J Med Qual ; 35(3): 205-212, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31248266

RESUMEN

This article reviews the risk-adjustment models underpinning the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) standardized infection ratios. After first describing the models, the authors focus on hospital intensive care unit (ICU) designation as a variable employed across the various risk models. The risk-adjusted frequency with which ICU services are reported in Medicare fee-for-service claims data was compared as a proxy for determining whether reporting of ICU days is similar across hospitals. Extreme variation was found in the reporting of ICU utilization among admissions for congestive heart failure, ranging from 25% in the lowest admission hospital quartile to 95% in the highest. The across-hospital variation in reported ICU utilization was found to be unrelated to patient severity. Given that such extreme variation appears in a designation of ICU versus non-ICU utilization, the NHSN risk-adjustment models' dependence on nursing unit designation should be a cause for concern.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Medicare/organización & administración , Ajuste de Riesgo/organización & administración , Benchmarking , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Medicare/normas , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Ajuste de Riesgo/normas , Estados Unidos
18.
BMJ Open ; 9(5): e024896, 2019 05 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31064804

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the suitability of the German version of the Manchester Triage System (MTS) as a potential tool to redirect emergency department (ED) patients to general practitioner care. Such tools are currently being discussed in the context of reorganisation of emergency care in Germany. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Single centre University Hospital Emergency Department. PARTICIPANTS: Adult, non-surgical ED patients. EXPOSURE: A non-urgent triage category was defined as a green or blue triage category according to the German version of the MTS. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Surrogate parameters for short-term risk (admission rate, diagnoses, length of hospital stay, admission to the intensive care unit, in-hospital and 30-day mortality) and long-term risk (1-year mortality). RESULTS: A total of 1122 people presenting to the ED participated in the study. Of these, 31.9% (n=358) received a non-urgent triage category and 68.1% (n=764) were urgent. Compared with non-urgent ED presentations, those with an urgent triage category were older (median age 60 vs 56 years, p=0.001), were more likely to require hospital admission (47.8% vs 29.6%) and had higher in-hospital mortality (1.6% vs 0.8%). There was no significant difference observed between non-urgent and urgent triage categories for 30-day mortality (1.2% [n=4] vs 2.2% [n=15]; p=0.285) or for 1-year mortality (7.9% [n=26] vs 10.5% [n=72]; p=0.190). Urgency was not a significant predictor of 1-year mortality in univariate (HR=1.35; 95% CI 0.87 to 2.12; p=0.185) and multivariate regression analyses (HR=1.20; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.89; p=0.420). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest the German MTS is unsuitable to safely identify patients for redirection to non-ED based GP care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: U1111-1119-7564; Post-results.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Control de Acceso , Medicina General/organización & administración , Ajuste de Riesgo/organización & administración , Medición de Riesgo , Triaje/métodos , Adulto , Urgencias Médicas/clasificación , Urgencias Médicas/epidemiología , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Control de Acceso/organización & administración , Control de Acceso/normas , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Efectos Adversos a Largo Plazo/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/normas
19.
Aten. prim. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 51(4): 218-229, abr. 2019. graf, tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-180862

RESUMEN

Objetivo: Analizar en el contexto de una Zona Básica de Salud (ZBS) la prevalencia de los factores de riesgo cardiovascular (FRCV) y el impacto que generan en la morbilidad y el consumo de recursos sanitarios en la población estratificada según el sistema Clinical Risk Groups (CRG) en Atención Primaria (AP), con la finalidad de identificar la población con multimorbilidad para aplicar medidas preventivas, así como aquella que genera más carga asistencial y necesidades sociales. Diseño: Estudio observacional, de corte transversal y ámbito poblacional para una ZBS durante el año 2013. Emplazamiento: Departamento de salud de Castellón, Comunidad Valenciana (CV). Incluye asistencia ambulatoria en AP y especializada. Participantes: Todos los ciudadanos dados de alta en el Sistema de Información Poblacional (SIP), N = 32.667. Mediciones: Del sistema informatizado Abucasis obtuvimos las variables demográficas, clínicas y de consumo de recursos sanitarios. Consideramos la prevalencia de los FRCV a partir de la presencia o ausencia de los códigos diagnósticos CIE.9.MC. Se analizó la relación de los FRCV con los 9 estados de salud CRG, y se realizó un análisis predictivo con el modelo de regresión logística para evaluar la capacidad explicativa de cada variable. Además, se obtuvo mediante regresión multivariante un modelo explicativo del gasto farmaceútico ambulatorio. Resultados: La población del estado de salud CRG 4 en adelante tenía multimorbilidad. Los estados de salud CRG 7 y CRG 6 tienen mayor prevalencia de FRCV. Fue predictivo que a mayor morbilidad, mayor consumo de recursos, mediante OR superiores a la media, p < 0,05 e intervalos de confianza del 95%. Se observó que un 59,8% del gasto farmacéutico ambulatorio quedaba explicado por el sistema CRG y todos los FRCV (p < 0,05 y R2 corregido = 0,598). En cuanto al efecto de los FRCV sobre los estados de salud CRG, hubo asociación significativa (p < 0,05) para la alteración de la glucemia, dislipidemia e HTA en todos los estados CRG. Conclusiones: El estudio de los FRCV en una población estratificada mediante el sistema CRG identifica y predice dónde se genera mayor impacto en la morbilidad y consumo de recursos sanitarios. Nos permite conocer los grupos de pacientes en quienes desarrollar estrategias de prevención y cronicidad. A nivel de la práctica clínica se aporta un nuevo concepto de multimorbilidad, definido a partir del estado de salud CRG 4 en adelante


Objective: To analyze the prevalence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors (CVRF) in the context of a Basic Health Area and the impact they generate on morbidity and consumption of healthcare resources in the stratified population according to the Clinical System Risk Groups (CRG) in Primary Care, with the purpose of identifying the population with multimorbidity to apply preventive measures, as well as the one that generates the highest care burden and social needs. Design: Observational, cross-sectional and population-based study for a basic health area during 2013. Location: Department of Health 2 (Castellón), Comunidad Valenciana (CV). Includes outpatient care in Primary Care and specialized. Participants: All citizens registered in the Population Information System, N = 32,667. Measurements: From the computerized system Abucasis we obtained the demographic, clinical and consumption variables of health resources. We consider the prevalence of CVRF based on the presence or absence of the ICD.9.MC diagnostic codes. The relationship of the CVRF with the 9 CRG health states was analyzed and a predictive analysis was performed with the logistic regression model to evaluate the explanatory capacity of each variable. In addition, an explanatory model of ambulatory pharmaceutical expenditure was obtained through multivariate regression. Results: The population of health status CRG4 and above had multimorbidity. The CRG7 and 6 health states have a higher prevalence of CVRF; it was predictive that the higher the morbidity, the greater the consumption of resources through OR above the mean, p < 0.05 and the 95% confidence intervals. It was observed that 59.8% of ambulatory pharmaceutical expenditure was explained by the CRG system and all the CVRF (p < 0.05 and R2 corrected = 0.598). Regarding the effect of the CVRF on the CRG health states, there was a significant association (p < 0.05) for the alteration of blood glucose, dyslipidemia and HBP in all the CRG states. Conclusions: The study of CVRF in a stratified population using the CRG system identifies and predicts where the greatest impact on morbidity and consumption of healthcare resources is generated. It allows us to know the groups of patients where to develop prevention and chronicity strategies. At the level of clinical practice, a new concept of multimorbidity is provided, defined from the state of health CRG 4 and above


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Grupos de Riesgo , Ajuste de Riesgo/organización & administración , Estado de Salud , Afecciones Crónicas Múltiples/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA