Pharmacokinetics of single-dose rivaroxaban under fed state in obese vs. non-obese subjects: An open-label controlled clinical trial (RIVOBESE-PK).

The evidence of rivaroxaban's pharmacokinetics in obese compared with non-obese populations remains inconclusive. We aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic profile of rivaroxaban between obese and non-obese populations under fed state. Participants who met the study's eligibility criteria were assigned into one of two groups: obese (body mass index ≥35 kg/m2) or non-obese (body mass index 18.5-24.9 kg/m2). A single dose of rivaroxaban 20 mg was orally administered to each participant. Nine blood samples over 48 h, and multiple urine samples over 18 h were collected and analyzed for rivaroxaban concentration using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass detector. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using WinNonlin software. Thirty-six participants were recruited into the study. No significant changes were observed between obese and non-obese participants in peak plasma concentration, time to reach peak plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 48 h or to infinity, elimination rate constant, half-life, apparent volume of distribution, apparent clearance, and fraction of drug excreted unchanged in urine over 18 h. Rivaroxaban's exposure was similar between the obese and non-obese subjects, and there were no significant differences in other pharmacokinetic parameters between the two groups. These results suggest that dose adjustment for rivaroxaban is probably unwarranted in the obese population.

Simvastatin, but Not Atorvastatin, Is Associated with Higher Peak Rivaroxaban Serum Levels and Bleeding: an Asian Cohort Study from Singapore.

AIMS: This study attempts to identify predictors associated with bleeding and stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) in Singaporean Asians taking rivaroxaban and apixaban. METHODS: A total of 134 Singaporean patients on either rivaroxaban or apixaban for non-valvular atrial fibrillation were included for this study. Baseline characteristics were recorded at recruitment while bleeding and SSE events were recorded during a 1-year follow-up. Peak and trough drug plasma concentrations were collected based on the dosing interval and pharmacokinetics of the drugs and quantified using high performance liquid chromatography. Characteristics of patients with or without bleeds were compared using relevant statistical tests. Multivariable regression that included covariates with p < 0.1 from an initial univariable regression was performed to analyse predictors that resulted in higher risk of bleeding in patients. RESULTS: Median creatinine clearance (CrCl) was significantly lower in patients on rivaroxaban who experienced bleeds as compared to patients who did not experience bleeds (61.5 vs 70.8 mL/min, p = 0.047), while concomitant simvastatin use was found to be independently associated with a sixfold increased risk of bleeding (adjusted OR = 6.14 (95% CI: 1.18-31.97), p = 0.031) for rivaroxaban after controlling for body mass index, CrCl and having experienced a previous SSE. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that concomitant use of simvastatin with rivaroxaban may be associated with bleeding events in an Asian cohort. Further studies using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling are required to investigate the drug-drug interactions between these drugs.

Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulants Following Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery.

ABSTRACT: Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vary in bioavailability and sites of absorption in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Data on DOAC use after major GIT surgery are limited. The aim of this case series was to report the impact of surgical resection or bypass of the GIT on rivaroxaban and apixaban peak plasma concentrations. This was a case series of patients who received rivaroxaban or apixaban after GIT surgery, during the period of July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Peak plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban and apixaban were assessed for the expected concentrations. Of the 27 assessed patients, 18 (66.7%) received rivaroxaban, and 9 (33.3%) received apixaban. After rivaroxaban therapy, 4 of 5 patients (80%) who underwent gastrectomy, and 3 of 3 patients (100%) who underwent duodenum and proximal jejunum exclusion had peak plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban lower than the effective range, whereas 11 of 11 patients (100%) who underwent distal bowel or ileostomy had peak rivaroxaban plasma within the effective range. After apixaban therapy, 5 of 6 patients (83.3%) who underwent total or partial gastrectomy achieved effective peak concentrations. All the patients who underwent proximal and distal bowel resection or bypass had peak concentrations of apixaban within the effective range. In conclusion, surgical resection or bypass of the upper GIT could affect DOAC absorption and subsequently peak plasma concentrations. This effect was more observed among rivaroxaban recipients. An injectable anticoagulant or vitamin K antagonist may be preferred if DOAC concentrations cannot be measured after GIT surgery.

Assessment of exposure to direct oral anticoagulants in elderly hospitalised patients.

It is unclear whether elderly patients established on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have greater exposure to these drugs, which could subsequently increase their risk of bleeding. We assessed DOAC exposure and factors affecting it in a real-world elderly cohort of patients. For this, 151 medically stable hospital inpatients (76 established on apixaban, 61 on rivaroxaban, 14 on dabigatran) with a median [interquartile range (IQR)] age of 84 (78-89) years were recruited. Patients provided blood samples for measurement of peak and trough plasma DOAC concentrations. There was up to 48-fold and 13-fold variation in trough and peak plasma drug concentrations respectively. A significantly greater proportion of patients on apixaban had peak plasma drug concentrations within the reported ranges compared to those on either rivaroxaban or dabigatran (82·9% vs. 44·3% vs. 64·3% respectively; P < 0·001). A third of the variability in DOAC plasma concentrations was attributed to the influences of DOAC dosage, renal function and gender. To what extent the observed increases in DOAC exposure in the older patients is the cause of their increased risk of bleeding, which could potentially be ameliorated by dosing titration, requires further investigation.

Evaluation of the in vitro stability of direct oral anticoagulants in blood samples under different storage conditions.

In this study, we evaluated the in vitro stability of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in blood samples of 57 patients under different storage conditions using functional coagulation assays. We determined the analyte concentrations (1) immediately after blood collection (baseline); (2) after storage of citrated whole blood (agitated) at room temperature and citrated plasma at room temperature and at 4 °C for 4, 8, and 24 h, respectively; and (3) after storage of citrated plasma at -20 °C for 30, 60, and 90 days. According to the concept of acceptable change limits (ACL), analytes were considered stable if the mean relative analyte recovery at a given time was >78%. The mean baseline values (range) of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban were 115 ng/mL (62-217), 129 ng/mL (31-215), 156 ng/mL (49-362), and 101 ng/mL (33-283), respectively. After applying the analyte stability limit, all four DOACs were stable for 24 h at room temperature and at 4 °C. The mean recovery after 24 h was 102-111% for dabigatran, 88-97% for rivaroxaban, 95-98% for apixaban, and 90-96% for edoxaban. When plasma samples were stored at -20 °C, the mean percentage deviation after 90 days for all four DOACs was ≤10%, even after three freeze-thaw cycles. Thus, for the correct determination of DOAC plasma concentrations, blood samples do not have to be analyzed immediately and can be stored at room temperature for up to 24 h before analysis. In clinical practice, blood sample transport and storage for DOAC measurements appear to be unproblematic.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Plasma Levels in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at the Time of Bleeding: A Pilot Prospective Study.

ABSTRACT: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) on long-term direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be at higher risk of bleeding because of higher anti-Xa or anti-IIa levels. However, there is no postmarketing study investigating these DOAC plasma levels at the time of bleeding. The aim of this study was to evaluate DOAC levels at the time of a bleeding emergency. We analyzed 5440 patients examined at our Emergency Department in from April 1, 2019, to September 30, 2019. During this period, we prospective identified 105 consecutive patients with bleeding while on long-term antithrombotic therapy; 49 patients had AF on DOACs. We compared DOAC levels in patients who bled against a control sample of 55 patients who tolerated long-term high dose DOAC therapy without any emergency. Samples of these patients were tested with drug-specific anti-Xa chromogenic analysis (rivaroxaban and apixaban) and with Hemoclot Thrombin Inhibitor assay (dabigatran). Dabigatran-treated patients who bled had significantly higher anti-IIa levels when compared with trough (261.4 ± 163.7 vs. 85.4 ± 57.2 ng/mL, P < 0.001) and peak samples of controls (261.4 ± 163.7 vs. 138.8 ± 78.7 ng/mL, P < 0.05). Similarly, there were significantly higher anti-Xa levels in rivaroxaban-treated and apixaban-treated patients with bleeding compared with trough control samples (rivaroxaban: 245.9 ± 150.2 vs. 52.5 ± 36.4 ng/mL, P <0.001 and apixaban: 311.8 ± 142.5 vs. 119.9 ± 81.7 ng/mL, P < 0.001), as well as in apixaban-treated patients when compared with peak control samples (311.8 ± 142.5 vs. 210.9 ± 88.7 ng/mL, P < 0.05). Finally, rivaroxaban anti-Xa levels in patients who bled tended to be higher compared with peak control samples (245.9 ± 150.2 vs. 177.6 ± 38.6 ng/mL, P = 0.13). This observational study showed a significant difference in anti-IIa and anti-Xa plasma levels in patients with AF with bleeding complications compared with those who tolerated long-term high-dose DOAC therapy without bleeding complications.

Sensitive LC-MS/MS method for quantification of rivaroxaban in plasma: Application to pharmacokinetic studies.

Rivaroxaban is an anticoagulant (orally active direct Xa inhibitor) considered to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism and treat deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and other cardiovascular complications. Bioanalytical methods for rivaroxaban quantification in plasma are necessary for application in pharmacokinetic studies, as well as in drug therapeutic monitoring. In this work, we developed and validated a sensitive bioanalytical method using LC-MS/MS for rivaroxaban quantification in human plasma using an one-step liquid-liquid extraction. The linear concentration range was 1-600 ng/mL. The bioanalytical method was also applied to pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers under fasting and fed conditions. The results demonstrated that the method is rapid, sensitive, and adequate for application in pharmacokinetic studies.

Study of thrombin generation with St Genesia to evaluate xaban pharmacodynamics: Analytical performances over 18 months.

INTRODUCTION: ST Genesia is a new automated system enabling quantitative standardized evaluation of thrombin generation (TG), for example, in patients receiving anti-Xa direct inhibitors (xabans). Data on its analytical performances are scarce. METHODS: Over an 18-month period, repeatability, reproducibility, and accuracy were assessed using STG-ThromboScreen (without or with thrombomodulin) or STG-DrugScreen reagents (corresponding to intermediate/high tissue-factor concentration, respectively), and controls. Furthermore, reproducibility was assessed using commercialized lyophilized and frozen normal pooled plasmas. Rivaroxaban and apixaban impacts on TG parameters were assessed using spiking experiments. Finally, a comparison with the Calibrated Automated Thrombogram method (CAT) (PPP reagent) was performed using plasma from healthy volunteers enrolled in the DRIVING-studyNCT01627665) before and after rivaroxaban intake. RESULTS: For all dedicated quality control (QC) levels, inter-series coefficients of variations (CV) were <7% for temporal TG parameters, peak height (PH), and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), whether results were normalized with a dedicated reference plasma STG-RefPlasma or not. Noteworthy, STG-RefPlasma used for normalization displayed substantially high PH and ETP. Mean biases between the observed and manufacturer's assigned QC values were mostly <7%. Both rivaroxaban/apixaban plasma concentrations were significantly associated with TG parameters. Finally, Bland-Altman plots showed a good agreement between ST Genesia-STG-ThromboScreen and CAT method within the explored range of values, although biases could be observed (PH: 16.4 ± 13.2%, ETP: 17.8 ± 11.9%). CONCLUSION: ST Genesia® enables the reliable measurement of TG parameters in both in vitro and ex vivo xaban plasma samples using either STG-ThromboScreen or STG-DrugScreen according to xaban concentrations. The use of reference plasma, despite not completely reflecting a normal pooled plasma behavior, likely improves standardization and inter-laboratory comparisons.

Impact of gene polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters on trough concentrations of rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Rivaroxaban is excreted from the body via multiple pathways involving glomerular filtration, drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters. In this study, we aimed to examine the impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms in P-glycoprotein, breast cancer resistance protein, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A5 and CYP2J2 on the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban. Eighty-six patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) undergoing AF catheter ablation were enrolled in this study. In these analyses, the dose-adjusted plasma trough concentration ratio (C0h /D) of rivaroxaban was used as the pharmacokinetic index. The median (quartile range) rivaroxaban C0h /D was 3.39 (2.08-5.21) ng/mL/mg (coefficient of variation: 80.5%). The C0h /D did not differ significantly among ABCB1 c.3435C>T, c.2677G>A/T, c.1236C>T, ABCG2 c.421C>A, CYP3A5*3 and CYP2J2*7 genotypes. Stepwise selection multiple linear regression analysis showed that the estimated glomerular filtration rate was the only independent factor influencing the C0h /D of rivaroxaban (R2  = 0.152, P < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between the C0h of rivaroxaban and prothrombin time (PT) (rho = 0.357, P = 0.001). In patients with NVAF, pharmacokinetic genotype tests are unlikely to be useful for prediction of the C0h of rivaroxaban.

Heparin Anti-Xa Activity, a Readily Available Unique Test to Quantify Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, Fondaparinux, and Danaparoid Levels.

BACKGROUND: Despite their usefulness in perioperative and acute care settings, factor-Xa inhibitor-specific assays are scarcely available, contrary to heparin anti-Xa assay. We assessed whether the heparin anti-Xa assay can (1) be used as a screening test to rule out apixaban, rivaroxaban, fondaparinux, and danaparoid levels that contraindicate invasive procedures according to current guidelines (>30 ng·mL-1, >30 ng·mL-1, >0.1 µg·mL-1, and >0.1 IU·mL-1, respectively), (2) quantify the anticoagulant level if found significant, that is, if it exceeded the abovementioned threshold. METHODS: In the derivation cohort then in the validation cohort, via receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, we evaluated the ability of heparin anti-Xa assay to detect levels of factor-Xa inhibitors above or below the abovementioned safety thresholds recommended for an invasive procedure (screening test). Among samples with relevant levels of factor-Xa inhibitor, we determined the conversion factor linking the measured level and heparin anti-Xa activity in a derivation cohort. In a validation cohort, the estimated level of each factor-Xa inhibitor was thus inferred from heparin anti-Xa activity. The agreement between measured and estimated levels of factor-Xa inhibitors was assessed. RESULTS: Among 989 (355 patients) and 756 blood samples (420 patients) in the derivation and validation cohort, there was a strong linear relationship between heparin anti-Xa activities and factor-Xa inhibitors measured level (r = 0.99 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.99-0.99]). In the derivation cohort, heparin anti-Xa activity ≤0.2, ≤0.3, <0.1, <0.1 IU·mL-1 reliably ruled out a relevant level of apixaban, rivaroxaban, fondaparinux, and danaparoid, respectively (area under the ROC curve ≥0.99). In the validation cohort, these cutoffs yielded excellent classification accuracy (≥96%). If this screening test indicated relevant level of factor-Xa inhibitor, estimated and measured levels closely agreed (Lin's correlation coefficient close to its maximal value: 95% CI, 0.99-0.99). More than 96% of the estimated levels fell into the predefined range of acceptability (ie, 80%-120% of the measured level). CONCLUSIONS: A unique simple test already widely used to assay heparin was also useful for quantifying these 4 other anticoagulants. Both clinical and economic impacts of these findings should be assessed in a specific study.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Direct Oral Anticoagulants May Increase Their Benefit-Risk Ratio.

The attractiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over vitamin K antagonists, in addition to a better benefit-risk ratio, stems from the fact that no therapeutic drug monitoring is deemed necessary. This has been recently mitigated by the fact that increased dabigatran (D) plasma levels have been associated with hemorrhages, and is currently under scrutiny of the European Medicines Agency. We aimed to evaluate, in real conditions of use, whether patients with out-of-range DOAC blood concentrations (too high or too low) were associated with bleeding or thrombosis. Patients treated with D or rivaroxaban (R) were prospectively included in a hospital cohort. D and R plasma levels were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-at the physician's demand. We defined concentration range as "expected" within the 95% confidence interval of the mean concentration obtained from pivotal trials, and "out of range" when concentrations were outside of that interval. A blind assessment of concentrations versus occurrence of bleeding or thrombosis was performed by means of univariate and multivariate analysis. Three hundred and twenty-two patients (mean age 78.5 years ± 13.1), treated with D or R were included consecutively. They had a mean CHA2DS2-VASc at 4.4 ± 1.7 and a mean HAS-BLED score at 1.7 ± 0.9. Irrespective of the DOAC prescribed, patients presenting with out-of-range concentrations had significantly more bleeding or thrombosis than patients with expected concentrations (P < 0.001). Patients with bleeding were more prone to have concentrations beyond the 95 percentile (N = 62, P < 0.001), whereas patients with thrombosis were more likely to have concentrations below the fifth percentile (N = 26, P < 0.05). The main risks associated with hemorrhages were abnormal concentrations, a high HAS-BLED score, the patient's age, and the creatinine blood level. For thrombosis, a concentration below the fifth percentile was the only risk factor that was significant in our cohort. While D and R under current recommendation have a better benefit-risk ratio than warfarin, their safe usage could be further optimized by some degree of therapeutic monitoring.

Drug-drug interaction of rivaroxaban and calcium channel blockers in patients aged 80 years and older with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Objectives For revealing the peculiarities of the drug-drug interaction of rivaroxaban (substrate CYP3A4 and P-gp) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) (verapamil - inhibitor CYP3A4 and P-gp and amlodipine - substrate CYP3A4) in patients 80 years and older with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NAF) we studied 128 patients. Methods All patients were divided into groups depending on the therapy taken: the 1st - rivaroxaban + amlodipine (n=51), the 2nd - rivaroxaban + verapamil (n=30), the control group - rivaroxaban without CCBs (n=47). A trough steady-state plasma concentration (C min,ss) of rivaroxaban, prothrombin time (PT) in the blood plasma and the event of clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding were assessed for each patient. Results Patient in group 2 had higher C min,ss of rivaroxaban, PT and CRNM than subjects in the control group (Me 73.8 [50.6-108.8] ng/mL vs. 40.5 [25.6-74.3] ng/mL; Me 14.8 [13.4-17.3] s vs. 13.8 [12.6-14.4] s; 34% vs. 13%, respectively, p<0.05 for all). When compared, the PT and complication rate in group 1 with the control group C min,ss of rivaroxaban were practically the same (p>0.05 for all). Conclusions In patients ≥80 years with NAF, the use of rivaroxaban in combination with verapamil may not be safe and can lead to CRNM bleeding.

Analysis of bioMARKer Distribution and Individual Reproducibility Under Rivaroxaban Treatment in Japanese Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (R-MARK Study, CVI ARO2).

The "on-therapy range" of direct oral anticoagulants is the 90% interval of drug concentration. Previously, we reported the on-therapy range of rivaroxaban in a single-center cohort. The present study aimed to confirm the range and intraindividual reproducibility in a multicenter cohort.Eligible patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation under rivaroxaban treatment for prevention of ischemic stroke were enrolled from nine institutes in Tokyo, Japan, between June 2016 and May 2017 (n = 324). The first and second (three months later) blood samples both taken within 1-5 hours after rivaroxaban intake were analyzed (n = 219). Plasma concentration of rivaroxaban (PC-Riv) and prothrombin time (PT) with five reagents were measured.The 90% interval of PC-Riv was 47.3-532.9 ng/mL. The 90% interval of PT measured with RecombiPlasTin 2G was 11.8-22.3 seconds, the widest range among the five reagents examined. PC-Riv reproducibility within a 90% interval was evaluated bidirectionally (first-to-second and second-to-first), and 92.4% of samples were reproducible. The change rate (CR) of PC-Riv between two samplings ranged widely, and high CR (≥54.3%, cutoff for predicting non-reproducibility) was predicted by concomitant drugs (non-dihydropyridine calcium antagonist and thiazide) and mitral regurgitation.We reported the on-therapy range of rivaroxaban in a multicenter cohort. This range was consistent with that of a single-center cohort and was highly reproducible within three months in daily clinical practice. However, caution is necessary regarding several factors that may affect the intraindividual variation of PC-Riv.

Effects of ticagrelor on the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban in rats.

CONTEXT: Rivaroxaban and ticagrelor are two common drugs for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome. However, the drug-drug interaction between them is still unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of ticagrelor on the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban in rats both in vivo and in vitro. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sensitive and reliable UPLC-MS/MS method was developed for the determination of rivaroxaban in rat plasma. Ten Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into ticagrelor pre-treated group (10 mg/kg/day for 14 days) and control group. The pharmacokinetics of orally administered rivaroxaban (10 mg/kg, single dose) with or without ticagrelor pre-treatment was investigated with developed UPLC-MS/MS method. Additionally, Sprague-Dawley rat liver microsomes were also used to investigate the drug-drug interaction between these two drugs in vitro. RESULTS: The C max (221.34 ± 53.33 vs. 691.18 ± 238.31 ng/mL) and the AUC(0-t) (1060.97 ± 291.21 vs. 3483.03 ± 753.83 µg·h/L) of rivaroxaban increased significantly (p < 0.05) with ticagrelor pre-treatment. The MRT(0-∞) of rivaroxaban increased from 4.41 ± 0.79 to 5.97 ± 1.11 h, while the intrinsic clearance decreased from 9.93 ± 2.55 to 2.89 ± 0.63 L/h/kg (both p < 0.05) after pre-treated with ticagrelor. Enzyme kinetic study indicated that ticagrelor decreased rivaroxaban metabolic clearance with the IC50 value of 14.04 µmol/L. CONCLUSIONS: Our in vivo and in vitro results demonstrated that there is a drug-drug interaction between ticagrelor and rivaroxaban in rats. Further studies need to be carried out to verify whether similar interactions truly apply in humans and whether these interactions have clinical significance.

Monitoring of rivaroxaban levels in patients with class III obesity.

PURPOSE: There is little evidence to guide the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with class III obesity. Clinicians face the dilemma that using DOACs in patients with class III obesity may not provide adequate anticoagulation, while avoiding DOACs may deprive them of a useful therapeutic option. We present 2 cases describing our experience navigating rivaroxaban use in patients with class III obesity and review available case reports of measurement of rivaroxaban levels using a calibrated anti-factor Xa assay. SUMMARY: In patient case 1, the rivaroxaban trough level was within the reference range, and therapy was continued. In patient case 2, the rivaroxaban trough level was below the reference range, and the patient's anticoagulation therapy was switched to warfarin. No thromboembolic events were noted in the 2 patients more than 1 year (15 and 22 months, respectively) after initiation of anticoagulation therapy. Because of the many advantages associated with use of DOACs instead of vitamin K antagonists, further research is critical to enabling clinicians to use DOACs more confidently in a broader population. CONCLUSION: When monitoring rivaroxaban therapy in patients with class III obesity, there is uncertainty regarding clinical interpretation of drug levels that fall outside of established reference ranges, and monitoring is not standardized or widely available. In addition to case reports found in the literature, the presented cases highlight these challenges and differing clinical decisions made when evaluating rivaroxaban levels in patients with class III obesity.

Absence of interaction between rivaroxaban, tacrolimus and everolimus in renal transplant recipients with deep vein thrombosis or atrial fibrillation.

No data are available on rivaroxaban use in renal transplant recipients and on its surmised interaction with immunosuppressants. The aim was to investigate potential interactions between rivaroxaban and immunosuppressants in this setting. Renal transplant recipients with a stable renal function treated with rivaroxaban and tacrolimus with or without everolimus were investigated. All drugs and creatinine concentrations were determined daily for 2 weeks after the start of anticoagulation. Blood samples were drawn at 8.00 am and 3-4 h later for trough and peak concentrations, respectively. Bleeding and thrombotic events were recorded during a minimum follow-up of 6 months. In 8 renal transplant patients, rivaroxaban levels showed a predictable pharmacokinetic trend, both at Ctrough (30-61 µg/L) and at Cpeak (143-449 µg/L), with limited variability in the 25th-75th percentile range. Tacrolimus (Ctrough 3-13 µg/L; Cpeak 3-16 µg/L), everolimus (Ctrough 3-11 µg/L; Cpeak 5-17 µg/L) and creatinine concentrations were stable as well. Immunosuppressors variability before and after rivaroxaban were 30% and 30% for tacrolimus, 27% and 29% for everolimus, respectively, as well as 14% and 3% for creatinine. For rivaroxaban monitoring, the reference change value better performed in identifying significant variations of its concentration. No patient had bleeding or thrombotic events, worsening of renal graft function, and signs of immunosuppressants toxicity during a mean follow-up of 23 (9-28) months. In conclusion, rivaroxaban does not seem to interact with tacrolimus and everolimus in renal transplant recipients. Both anticoagulant and immunosuppressive effects seem warranted, without major bleeding complications and effect on the graft function.

Ticagrelor and Rivaroxaban Elimination With CytoSorb Adsorber Before Urgent Off-Pump Coronary Bypass.

CytoSorb hemoadsorption (CytoSorbents Inc, Monmouth Junction, NJ) was performed shortly before an urgent off-pump coronary artery bypass operation in a 58-year-old man at high risk of bleeding as a result of treatment of coronary artery disease with ticagrelor and treatment of atrial fibrillation with rivaroxaban. The patient experienced dissection of the left anterior descending artery during a percutaneous coronary intervention. Preoperatively, CytoSorb hemoadsorption was applied to eliminate the coagulative active medications. His intraoperative and postoperative courses were uneventful, with adequate bleeding control. This case highlights a promising approach for managing antiplatelet drugs and anticoagulant agents such as ticagrelor and rivaroxaban before off-pump coronary artery bypass.

Laboratory monitoring of rivaroxaban in Chinese patients with deep venous thrombosis: a preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: Rivaroxaban, a novel oral anticoagulant drug, is widely used in clinical practice. There is no standardized laboratory monitoring for rivaroxaban, and its plasma concentration in Chinese patients with deep vein thrombosis is unclear. The rivaroxaban concentrations in human plasma and determine the steady-state concentration of rivaroxaban in patients with deep vein thrombosis are needed. METHODS: An ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection method was developed. Chromatographic separation was performed on a Waters BEH C18 column with isocratic elution using a mobile phase composed of acetonitrile and water. Quantitation of the analytes was performed using positive ionization mode and mass transitions of m/z 437.3 → m/z 145.0 and m/z 440.1 → m/z 145.0 for rivaroxaban and the internal standard, respectively. Blood samples were collected at 0 h and 2 h after patients took rivaroxaban for 7 days or more. RESULTS: The method was validated over the concentration range of 0.5 ~ 400 ng•mL- 1 with a very low limit of quantification of 0.5 ng·mL- 1, and the intra- and inter-day precision (RSD%) were < 15%. The range of the steady state concentration in patients that took 15 mg rivaroxaban twice daily, 10 mg twice daily, 20 mg once daily, 15 mg once daily, and 10 mg once daily were 168.5 ~ 280.1 ng•mL- 1, 74.2 ~ 271.4 ng•mL- 1, 25.7 ~ 306.8 ng•mL- 1, 24.5 ~ 306.4 ng•mL- 1, and 15.4 ~ 229.2 ng•mL- 1, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The plasma rivaroxaban concentration in patients who took 10 mg rivaroxaban twice daily fluctuated less than that in patients who took 20 mg rivaroxaban once daily. The plasma concentration can be used for therapeutic drug monitoring for rivaroxaban.

Associations between model-predicted rivaroxaban exposure and patient characteristics and efficacy and safety outcomes in the prevention of venous thromboembolism.

Anticoagulant plasma concentrations and patient characteristics might affect the benefit-risk balance of therapy. The study objective was to assess the impact of model-predicted rivaroxaban exposure and patient characteristics on outcomes in patients receiving rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis (VTE-P) after hip/knee replacement surgery. Post hoc exposure-response analyses were conducted using data from the phase 3 RECORD1-4 studies, in which 12,729 patients were randomized to rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily or enoxaparin for ≤ 39 days. Multivariate regression approaches were used to correlate model-predicted individual rivaroxaban exposures and patient characteristics with outcomes. In the absence of measured rivaroxaban exposure, exposure estimates were predicted based on individual increases in prothrombin time (PT) and by making use of the known correlation between rivaroxaban plasma concentration and dynamics of PT. No significant associations between rivaroxaban exposure and total VTE or major bleeding were identified. A significant association between exposure and a composite of major or non-major clinically relevant (NMCR) bleeding from day 4 after surgery was observed. The relationship was shallow, with an approximate predicted absolute increase in a composite of major or NMCR bleeding from 1.08 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-1.54] to 2.18% (95% CI 1.51-3.17) at the 5th and 95th percentiles of trough plasma concentration, respectively. In conclusion, based on the underlying data and analysis, no reliable target window for exposure with improved benefit-risk could be identified within the investigated exposure range. Hence, monitoring rivaroxaban levels is unlikely to be beneficial in VTE-P.

Associations between model-predicted rivaroxaban exposure and patient characteristics and efficacy and safety outcomes in the treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Anticoagulant plasma concentrations and patient characteristics might affect the benefit-risk balance of therapy. This study assessed the impact of model-predicted rivaroxaban exposure and patient characteristics on outcomes in patients receiving rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolism treatment (VTE-T) using data from the phase 3 EINSTEIN-DVT and EINSTEIN-PE studies. In the absence of measured rivaroxaban exposure, exposure estimates were predicted based on individual increases in prothrombin time (PT) and the known correlation between rivaroxaban plasma concentrations and PT dynamics. The composite efficacy outcomes evaluated were recurrent deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) and recurrent DVT, PE and all-cause death; safety outcomes were major bleeding and the composite of major or non-major clinically relevant (NMCR) bleeding. Exposure-response relationships were evaluated using multivariate logistic and Cox regression for the twice-daily (BID) and once-daily (OD) dosing periods, respectively. Predicted rivaroxaban exposure and CrCl were significantly associated with both efficacy outcomes in the BID period. In the OD period, exposure was significantly associated with recurrent DVT and PE but not recurrent DVT, PE and all-cause death. The statistically significant exposure-efficacy relationships were shallow. Exposure-safety relationships were absent within the investigated exposure range. During both dosing periods, low baseline hemoglobin and prior bleeding were associated with the composite of major or NMCR bleeding. In conclusion, based on the underlying data and analysis, no reliable target window for exposure with improved benefit-risk could be identified within the investigated exposure range. Therefore, monitoring rivaroxaban levels is unlikely to be beneficial in VTE-T.