Recent advances in liquid chromatographic methods for the determination of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors.

Depression is now the second largest public health burden throughout the world. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) have replaced older antidepressants to become first-line medications to treat this disease with increased remission rates and markedly decreased incidence of severe adverse events. Traditional and modern bioanalytical strategies for SSRI and SNRI determination are being continuously improved. There has also been a recent increase in the use of unconventional sample preparation methods. This review critically evaluates the development of SSRI and SNRI liquid chromatographic analytical methods published between 2014 and mid-2019, with special attention to novel sample preparation methods.

Postpartum Bleeding in Pregnant Women Receiving SSRIs/SNRIs: New Insights From a Descriptive Observational Study and an Analysis of Data from the FAERS Database.

PURPOSE: To date, the available data on the relationship between the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or the serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) venlafaxine and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) are conflicting and have not been extensively investigated, especially in terms of plasma drug concentrations. We performed data mining of antidepressant-induced PPH reported to the US Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System database, to assess the strength of the potential association between antidepressant pharmacotherapy and PPH in pregnant women. Concurrently, we carried out a descriptive observational population (pregnant women) analysis of the correlation between the plasma concentrations of SSRIs/SNRIs used during pregnancy and the extent of bleeding at delivery. METHODS: A disproportionality analysis of individual case study reports of PPH associated with SSRIs or venlafaxine in pregnant women was performed. Reporting odds ratio was used as a measure of disproportionality analysis. Pregnant women treated with an SSRI or SNRI (venlafaxine) for depressive or anxiety disorder and who consented to plasma drug concentration monitoring at the time of delivery were recruited. Plasma drug concentration assay was performed according to validated LC-MS/MS. Based on plasma drug concentrations, patients were classified into 1 of 2 groups, in therapeutic range or below therapeutic range for the drug administered, in accordance with the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie guideline, and correlations with blood loss were identified, with PPH defined as a blood loss of >500 mL. FINDINGS: Only 43 Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) reported at least one SSRIs or venlafaxine as suspect drug in 14 years (database analyses). Forty-three women were enrolled in the study population (observational study). In 24 patients (55.8%) the plasma drug concentration was below the therapeutic threshold. Unexpectedly, the mean blood loss in the below-range group was significantly higher than that in the in-range group. PPH occurred in 30% of women: in 9.3% and in 20.7% of patients in the in-range and below-range groups, respectively. IMPLICATIONS: Although preliminary, these data indicate a rather good tolerability profile of SSRIs/SNRIs regarding postpartum bleeding. Moreover, they suggest that keeping the plasma levels of SSRIs/SNRIs low as a precautionary measure does not reduce postpartum bleeding, which was higher in the below-range group. The findings from this study suggest that the use of therapeutic drug monitoring in pregnancy, a period in which multiple variables affect drug metabolism, may allow for better treatment customization, with subsequent advantages in terms of tolerability and efficacy of treatment.

Serum and Saliva Concentrations of Venlafaxine, O-Desmethylvenlafaxine, Quetiapine, and Citalopram in Psychiatric Patients.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring has become increasingly important in psychiatric therapy. However, it is not yet implemented as a daily routine in clinical settings. To evaluate new, noninvasive procedures, we compared blood and saliva venlafaxine, quetiapine, and citalopram concentrations in samples collected from psychiatric patients. METHODS: We collected blood and saliva samples from 75 psychiatric patients (39 venlafaxine, 19 quetiapine, and 17 citalopram). Saliva sampling was achieved by the use of cotton pads. Venlafaxine (and its metabolite O-desmethylvenlafaxine) and quetiapine were analyzed by LC-MS/MS, whereas citalopram was analyzed by HPLC. RESULTS: We observed significant correlations between concentrations of venlafaxine (ratio saliva/serum ± SD: 18.3 ± 9.5, P < 0.01, r = 0.895) and its metabolite O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ratio saliva/serum ± SD: 4.1 ± 3.2, P < 0.05, r = 0.344), quetiapine (ratio saliva/serum ± SD: 0.2 ± 0.2, P < 0.01, r = 0.935), and citalopram (ratio saliva/serum ± SD: 2.6 ± 1.2, P < 0.05, r = 0.54) in serum and in saliva. Furthermore, measured concentrations of venlafaxine (and its metabolite O-desmethylvenlafaxine) and citalopram were higher in saliva than in serum, whereas measured concentrations of quetiapine were higher in serum than in saliva. CONCLUSIONS: Using cotton pad saliva sampling, venlafaxine and quetiapine demonstrate high correlations between saliva and serum concentrations, whereas for O-desmethylvenlafaxine and citalopram, other methods of sampling might be preferable. Saliva therapeutic drug monitoring of psychoactive drugs might become a useful approach to achieving individual treatment regimens.

Impact of CYP2D6 on venlafaxine metabolism in Trinidadian patients with major depressive disorder.

AIM: This study aimed to assess the impact of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 variation on venlafaxine (VEN) at steady state in patients from Trinidad and Tobago of Indian and African descent with major depressive disorder. PATIENTS & METHODS: Patients were phenotyped with dextromethorphan, genotyped for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19, and metabolic ratios for VEN obtained at 2-week intervals. RESULTS: Of 61 patients, 55 were genotyped and phenotyped and 47 completed 8 weeks of VEN treatment. The majority of patients had metabolic ratios for VEN that were consistent with those for dextromethorphan and genotype-predicted phenotype using activity scores. One subject presented with a novel no-function allele, CYP2D6*99. No correlations were observed with CYP2C19 genotype. CONCLUSION: CYP2D6 genotype analysis provides valuable information to individualize drug therapy with VEN.

An open-label positron emission tomography study to evaluate serotonin transporter occupancy following escalating dosing regimens of (R)-(-)-O-desmethylvenlafaxine and racemic O-desmethylvenlafaxine.

SEP-227162 [R(-)-O-desmethylvenlafaxine] is an enantiomer of the venlafaxine metabolite O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODV, Pristiq™, Wyeth). This study compared the serotonin transporter (SERT) occupancy achieved by SEP-227162 and ODV, at daily doses of 25, 50, 100, and 150 mg using [11 C]DASB positron emission tomography (PET). Sixteen healthy male subjects participated in one of four dose groups (N = 4 per group) during which they were administered two doses of the study drug (SEP-227162 or ODV). For each study drug, total daily doses of 25, 50, 100, and150 mg were studied. Subjects underwent three PET scans with [11 C]DASB. A baseline, off-medication, scan was performed prior to dosing and a [11 C]DASB PET scan was performed after 72 hr at each dose level. [11 C]DASB binding potential (BPND ) was calculated using the simplified reference tissue method. SERT occupancy was calculated as the change in BPND (ΔBPND ) from baseline scan to the on-medication scan relative to the baseline BPND value. SEP-227162 and ODV significantly reduced regional distribution volumes and region BPND values in a dose-dependent manner. Across all doses ODV produced significantly greater SERT occupancy than SEP-227162 (ANOVA F = 21.8, df = 1,23, p < .001). The total daily dose required to provide 50% SERT occupancy was 24.8 mg for SEP-227162 and 14.4 mg for ODV. In vitro data suggests a ratio of 3.3:1 for binding at human SERT for SEP-227162 relative to ODV. Our study suggests a ratio of 1.7:1, highlighting the value of in vivo imaging in the drug development process.

Influence of ABCB1 polymorphisms and serum concentrations on venlafaxine response in patients with major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamics of antidepressants show large inter-individual variations which result in unpredictable clinical responses. AIM: The aim of the study was to examine the effect of ABCB1 polymorphisms and the serum concentrations on the efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Fifty-two outpatients who met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for MDD were recruited for the study. The severity of depression was assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scale (HDRS17) and tolerability was assessed based on a query regarding side-effects for 6 weeks. The ABCB1 C3435T/A and G2677T/A polymorphisms were genotyped by PCR/RFLP and steady-state serum venlafaxine concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Patients with the TT genotype for the C3435T and the TT/TA genotype for the G2677T/A polymorphism showed significantly higher frequencies in venlafaxine-induced akathisia. This relationship was not observed for efficacy. As regards serum venlafaxine concentrations, patient groups showed no significant differences in efficacy and tolerability. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that individuals with the TT-TT/TA genotypes for the C3435T-G2677T/A polymorphisms of ABCB1 may be pre-disposed to a risk of akathisia.

Analytical Strategies for the Determination of Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors in Pharmaceutical Formulations and Biological Fluids.

Norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (NRIs) are a class of antidepressant drugs that act as reuptake inhibitors for the neurotransmitters norepinephrine and epinephrine. The present review provides an account of analytical methods published in recent years for the determination of NRI drugs. NRIs are atomoxetine, reboxetine, viloxazine and maprotiline. NRIs with less activity at other sites are mazindol, bupropion, tapentadol, and teniloxazine. This review focuses on the analytical methods including chromatographic, spectrophotometric, electroanalytical, and electrophoresis techniques for NRI analysis from pharmaceutical formulations and biological samples. Among all of the published methods, liquid chromatography with UV-vis or MS-MS detection is the most popular technique. The most the common sample preparation techniques in the analytical methods for NRIs include liquid-liquid extraction and solid-phase extraction. Besides the analytical methods for single components, some of the simultaneous determinations are also included in this review.

Disposition and metabolism of [14C]-levomilnacipran, a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, in humans, monkeys, and rats.

Levomilnacipran is approved in the US for the treatment of major depressive disorder in adults. We characterized the metabolic profile of levomilnacipran in humans, monkeys, and rats after oral administration of [(14)C]-levomilnacipran. In vitro binding of levomilnacipran to human plasma proteins was also studied. Unchanged levomilnacipran was the major circulating compound after dosing in all species. Within 12 hours of dosing in humans, levomilnacipran accounted for 52.9% of total plasma radioactivity; the circulating metabolites N-desethyl levomilnacipran N-carbamoyl glucuronide, N-desethyl levomilnacipran, and levomilnacipran N-carbamoyl glucuronide accounted for 11.3%, 7.5%, and 5.6%, respectively. Similar results were seen in monkeys. N-Desethyl levomilnacipran and p-hydroxy levomilnacipran were the main circulating metabolites in rats. Mass balance results indicated that renal excretion was the major route of elimination with 58.4%, 35.5%, and 40.2% of total radioactivity being excreted as unchanged levomilnacipran in humans, monkeys, and rats, respectively. N-Desethyl levomilnacipran was detected in human, monkey, and rat urine (18.2%, 12.4%, and 7.9% of administered dose, respectively). Human and monkey urine contained measurable quantities of levomilnacipran glucuronide (3.8% and 4.1% of administered dose, respectively) and N-desethyl levomilnacipran glucuronide (3.2% and 2.3% of administered dose, respectively); these metabolites were not detected in rat urine. The metabolites p-hydroxy levomilnacipran and p-hydroxy levomilnacipran glucuronide were detected in human urine (≤ 1.2% of administered dose), and p-hydroxy levomilnacipran glucuronide was found in rat urine (4% of administered dose). None of the metabolites were pharmacologically active. Levomilnacipran was widely distributed with low plasma protein binding (22%).

Effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of levomilnacipran following a single oral dose of levomilnacipran extended-release capsule in humans.

PURPOSE: Levomilnacipran extended-release (ER) is indicated for treatment of major depressive disorder in adults. We evaluated the pharmacokinetic and safety profile of levomilnacipran ER in individuals with impaired renal function. METHODS: A total of 32 individuals participated in four groups (eight in each group) with normal, mild, moderately, or severely impaired renal function. Each participant received one dose of levomilnacipran ER 40 mg. Blood and urine were assayed using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Results between normal and renally impaired groups were compared using analysis of variance. Safety measures included adverse events, laboratory evaluations, vital signs, suicidality, and electrocardiograms. RESULTS: Following administration of levomilnacipran, mean (standard deviation) maximum plasma concentration in participants with normal renal function, and mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment was 83.9 (21.0), 81.8 (23.4), 98.7 (18.1), and 122.1 (35.1) (ng/mL), respectively; area under the curve from time zero to infinity was 2,101.0 (516.9), 2,587.8 (649.9), 4,016.4 (995.4), and 5,900.8 (1,799.3) (h · ng/mL), respectively; terminal elimination half-life was 13.5 (2.8), 17.3 (3.5), 19.1 (4.6), and 27.7 (7.4) (hours), respectively; and renal clearance was 175.9 mL/min, 114.7 mL/min, 69.9 mL/min, and 28.6 mL/min, respectively. Levomilnacipran ER was generally well tolerated with no safety issues of concern identified. CONCLUSION: Renal impairment was associated with increased plasma levels of levomilnacipran and prolonged half-life. No dose adjustment is required for individuals with mild renal impairment; the recommended maximum daily maintenance dose of levomilnacipran ER should not exceed 80 mg for individuals with moderate renal impairment and 40 mg for individuals with severe renal impairment.

Melperone but not bisoprolol or metoprolol is a clinically relevant inhibitor of CYP2D6: evidence from a therapeutic drug monitoring survey.

Cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP) can be inhibited or induced by drugs, resulting in clinically significant drug-drug interactions that can cause unanticipated adverse reactions or therapeutic failures. The objective of the study was to analyze the in vivo inhibitory potential of the beta-blockers bisoprolol and metoprolol as well as the low-potency antipsychotic melperone on CYP2D6. By utilizing a large therapeutic drug monitoring database of 2874 samples, data from patients who had been treated with venlafaxine (VEN) either without (control group) or with a concomitant medication with bisoprolol, metoprolol or melperone were evaluated retrospectively to study the CYP2D6-catalyzed O-demethylation to O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODVEN). Dose-adjusted serum levels (C/D) of VEN and ODVEN as well as the metabolic ratios (ODVEN/VEN) were computed for the four groups and compared using Kruskal-Wallis test. In total, 381 patients could be included for analysis. No significant difference was found in the median C/D (VEN), C/D (ODVEN) or C/D of the active moiety (VEN + ODVEN) in either the metoprolol (N = 103) or bisoprolol group (N = 101), compared to the control group (N = 108). In contrast, a significantly higher median C/D (VEN) (0.79 ng/ml/mg, range 0.13-5.73 ng/ml/mg) (P < 0.01) was found in the melperone group (N = 69), compared to the control group (0.46 ng/ml/mg, range 0.02-7.39 ng/ml/mg). A significant decrease (P < 0.01) was solely found in the median metabolic ratios of ODVEN/VEN between the melperone group (0.90, range 0.14-15.15), compared to the control group (2.39, range 0.06-15.31). The results of this study provided evidence that melperone but not bisoprolol or metoprolol has a clinically relevant inhibitory potential on CYP2D6.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interaction between ticagrelor and venlafaxine, a cytochrome P-450 2D6 substrate, in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: Ticagrelor is a reversibly binding P2Y12 receptor antagonist used clinically for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Ticagrelor has been shown in vitro to be a weak inhibitor of cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 2D6, a clinically important enzyme for the metabolism of many drugs. This study assessed the effects of coadministration of ticagrelor on the pharmacokinetics of the CYP2D6 substrate venlafaxine. The impact of venlafaxine on ticagrelor pharmacokinetic parameters was also investigated. METHODS: Healthy subjects (N = 22) received a single 180-mg oral dose of ticagrelor on days 1 and 9 and oral doses of venlafaxine on day 4 (37.5 mg BID) and days 5 through 10 (75 mg BID). Plasma concentrations of ticagrelor, venlafaxine, and their metabolites (AR-C124910XX and O-desmethylvenlafaxine [ODV], respectively) were quantified for pharmacokinetic analyses. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study. FINDINGS: Overall, 19 of 25 subjects were male; 14 were white, 10 were black, and 1 was Asian. Mean (SD) age was 26 (6) years, and mean (SD) body mass index was 24.3 (2.9) kg/m(2). Ticagrelor had no effect on overall exposure to venlafaxine, as assessed by the AUC0-τ (geometric least squares mean ratio, 110.32 ng · h/mL [90% CI, 106.27-114.52]). Venlafaxine Cmax was increased by 22% in the presence of ticagrelor (121.83 ng/mL [90% CI, 111.80-132.75]). ODV AUC0-τ and Cmax were unaffected by coadministration with ticagrelor (98.71 ng · h/mL [90% CI, 96.61-100.85] and 101.44 ng/mL [90% CI, 98.34-104.65], respectively). Venlafaxine had no effect on the Cmax or AUC0-∞ of ticagrelor (96.54 ng/mL [90% CI, 85.03-109.61] and 89.67 ng · h/mL [90% CI, 82.78-97.14]) or AR-C124910XX (106.39 ng/mL [90% CI, 96.10-117.78] and 106.32 ng · h/mL [90% CI, 97.28-116.21], respectively). Ticagrelor and venlafaxine were well tolerated whether given alone or in combination. IMPLICATIONS: Ticagrelor had no clinically relevant effect on the plasma levels of venlafaxine and its CYP2D6-generated active metabolite, ODV. On the basis of these data, ticagrelor is not expected to affect CYP2D6-mediated drug metabolism to a clinically relevant extent. Venlafaxine had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor.