Association Between Sleep Apnea Treatment and Health Care Resource Use in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) contributes to the generation, recurrence, and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation, and it is associated with worse outcomes. Little is known about the economic impact of OSA therapy in atrial fibrillation. This retrospective cohort study assessed the impact of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy adherence on health care resource use and costs in patients with OSA and atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Insurance claims data for ≥1 year before sleep testing and 2 years after device setup were linked with objective PAP therapy use data. PAP adherence was defined from an extension of the US Medicare 90-day definition. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to create covariate-balanced PAP adherence groups to mitigate confounding. Of 5867 patients (32% women; mean age, 62.7 years), 41% were adherent, 38% were intermediate, and 21% were nonadherent. Mean±SD number of all-cause emergency department visits (0.61±1.21 versus 0.77±1.55 [P=0.023] versus 0.95±1.90 [P<0.001]), all-cause hospitalizations (0.19±0.69 versus 0.24±0.72 [P=0.002] versus 0.34±1.16 [P<0.001]), and cardiac-related hospitalizations (0.06±0.26 versus 0.09±0.41 [P=0.023] versus 0.10±0.44 [P=0.004]) were significantly lower in adherent versus intermediate and nonadherent patients, as were all-cause inpatient costs ($2200±$8054 versus $3274±$12 065 [P=0.002] versus $4483±$16 499 [P<0.001]). All-cause emergency department costs were significantly lower in adherent and intermediate versus nonadherent patients ($499±$1229 and $563±$1292 versus $691±$1652 [P<0.001 and P=0.002], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest clinical and economic benefits of PAP therapy in patients with concomitant OSA and atrial fibrillation. This supports the value of diagnosing and managing OSA and highlights the need for strategies to enhance PAP adherence in this population.

Medicare volume and reimbursement trends in lingual and hyoid procedures for obstructive sleep apnea.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to analyze utilization and reimbursement trends in lingual and hyoid surgery for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: Annual retrospective data on lingual and hyoid OSA surgeries was obtained from the 2000-2021 Medicare Part B National Summary Datafiles. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes utilized included 21,685 (hyoid myotomy and suspension [HMS]), 41,512 (tongue base suspension [TBS]), 41,530 (radiofrequency ablation of the tongue [RFT]) and 42,870 (lingual tonsillectomy [LT]). RESULTS: The number of lingual and hyoid OSA surgeries rose 2777 % from 121 in 2000 to 3481 in 2015, before falling 82.9 % to 594 in 2021. Accordingly, Medicare payments rose 17,899 % from an inflation-adjusted $46,958 in 2000 to $8.45 million in 2015, before falling drastically to $341,011 in 2021. As the number of HMSs (2000: 91; 2015: 84; 2021: 165), TBS (2009: 48; 2015: 31; 2021: 16), and LTs (2000: 121; 2015: 261; 2021: 234) only experienced modest changes in utilization, this change was largely driven by RFT (2009: 340; 2015: 3105; 2021: 179). Average Medicare payments for RFT rose from $1110 in 2009 to $2994 in 2015, before falling drastically to $737 in 2021. CONCLUSION: Lingual and hyoid surgery for OSA has overall fallen in utilization among the Medicare population from 2000 to 2021. However, there was a brief spike in usage, peaking in 2015, driven by the adoption (and then quick dismissal) of RFT. The rise and fall in RFT use coincide with the rise and fall in reimbursement.

Early recognition and treatment of OSA in hospitalized patients and its impact on health care utilization in rural population: a real-world study.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent, yet underdiagnosed, condition. Due to its adverse impact on risk for cardiopulmonary disorders, there is interest in proactive screening of OSA in hospitalized patients. We studied the long-term outcome of such screened patients who were initiated on positive airway pressure therapy. METHODS: Hospitalized patients who screened positive for OSA and were confirmed with postdischarge polysomnography were dichotomized by positive airway pressure therapy adherence and followed for a period of 12 months to evaluate for the composite end point of hospital readmissions and emergency department visits for cardiopulmonary reasons. Cost analysis between the 2 groups was also conducted. RESULTS: A total of 2,042 hospitalized patients were assessed for OSA as part of a hospital sleep medicine program from August 2019-June 2023. Of these, 293 patients were diagnosed with OSA and prescribed positive airway pressure therapy. Of these 293 patients, 108 were adherent to therapy and 185 were nonadherent. The overall characteristics of the groups included a mean (standard deviation) age of 58 years (12.82), mean body mass index (kg/m2) of 39.72 (10.71), 57% male sex, and apnea-hypopnea index of 25.49 (26). Of the patients, 78%, 41%, and 43% had hypertension, congestive heart failure, and diabetes mellitus, respectively. The composite end point of hospital readmissions and emergency department visits for cardiovascular and pulmonary reasons was significantly higher in the nonadherent group than in the adherent group (hazard ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1-1.54) (P = .03). The cost of care for both hospital billing as well as professional billing was higher for the nonadherent group ($1,455.60 vs $1,723.50, P = .004 in hospital billing cost and $130.90 vs $144.70, P < .001 in professional billing). Length of stay was higher for nonadherent patients (2.7 ± 5.1 days vs 2.3 ± 5.9 days). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized patients diagnosed with OSA and adherent to therapy have reduced readmissions and emergency department visits for cardiopulmonary reasons 12 months after discharge. Adherent patients have reduced cost of health care and length of stay during hospitalizations. CITATION: Sharma S, Stansbury R, Srinivasan P, et al. Early recognition and treatment of OSA in hospitalized patients and its impact on health care utilization in rural population: a real-world study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(8):1313-1319.

Telemedicine management of obstructive sleep apnea disorder in China: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial.

PURPOSE: Previous studies assessed different components of telemedicine management pathway for OSA instead of the whole pathway. This randomized, controlled, and non-inferiority trial aimed to assess whether telemedicine management is clinically inferior to in-person care in China. METHODS: Adults suspected of OSA were randomized to telemedicine (web-based questionnaires, self-administered home sleep apnea test [HSAT], automatically adjusting positive airway pressure [APAP], and video-conference visits) or in-person management (paper questionnaires, in-person HSAT set-up, APAP, and face-to-face visits). Participants with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 15 events/hour received APAP for 3 months. The non-inferiority analysis was based on the change in Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) score and APAP adherence. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed. RESULTS: In the modified intent-to-treat analysis set (n = 111 telemedicine, 111 in-person), FOSQ scores improved 1.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-2.14) points with telemedicine and 2.05 (1.64-2.46) points with in-person care. The lower bound of the one-sided 95% non-inferiority CI for the difference in change between groups of - 0.812 was larger than the non-inferiority threshold of - 1. APAP adherence at 3 months was 243.3 (223.1-263.5) minutes/night for telemedicine and 241.6 (221.3-261.8) minutes/night for in-person care. The lower bound of the one-sided 95% non-inferiority CI of - 22.2 min/night was higher than the non-inferiority delta of - 45 min/night. Telemedicine had lower total costs than in-person management (CNY 1482.7 ± 377.2 vs. 1912.6 ± 681.3; p < 0.0001), driven by patient costs, but no significant difference in QALYs. CONCLUSIONS: Functional outcomes and adherence were not clinically inferior in patients managed by a comprehensive telemedicine approach compared to those receiving in-person care in China. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.chictr.org.cn , Registration number ChiCTR2000030546. Retrospectively registered on March 06, 2020.

The overlap of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and obstructive sleep apnea in hospitalizations for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: This study examined in-hospital outcomes for patients with both chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), also known as COPD-OSA overlap syndrome, during hospitalizations for acute exacerbation of COPD. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample was used to examine in-hospital mortality, length of stay, costs, and utilization of supportive ventilation in patients with COPD-OSA overlap during acute exacerbation of COPD hospitalizations. A 1-to-1 matched case-control design was utilized to match patients with and without OSA. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to examine mortality and ventilatory support, while controlling for potentially confounding diagnoses. RESULTS: COPD-OSA overlap was associated with longer median length of stay (4 days OSA, 3 days non-OSA; P < .001), higher mean costs ($32,197 OSA, $29,011 non-OSA; P < .001), increased utilization of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (13.92% OSA, 6.78% non-OSA; P < .001), and when required for greater than 96 hours, earlier initiation of mechanical ventilation (2.53 days OSA, 3.35 days non-OSA; P = .001). However, COPD-OSA overlap was associated with reduced mortality (0.81% OSA, 1.05% non-OSA; P < .001). These differences in mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 0.650; 95% confidence interval: 0.624-0.678) and noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation usage (adjusted odds ratio: 1.998; 95% confidence interval: 1.970-2.026) remained when adjusted for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with COPD-OSA overlap have higher utilization of supportive ventilation and longer length of stay during acute exacerbation of COPD hospitalizations, contributing to higher costs. The diagnosis of OSA is associated with reduced mortality in these hospitalizations, which may be related to greater utilization of supportive ventilation when OSA is recognized. CITATION: De la Fuente JRO, Greenberg P, Sunderram J. The overlap of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and obstructive sleep apnea in hospitalizations for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(6):863-870.

Occult, undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea is associated with increased health care resource utilization and costs among older adults with comorbid depression: a retrospective cohort study among Medicare beneficiaries.

Obstructive sleep apnea and depression are highly comorbid among older adults, and each is associated with increased economic costs and health care resource utilization. The purpose of this study was to determine the economic burden of comorbid occult obstructive sleep apnea among a random sample of older adult Medicare beneficiaries in the United States. Among 41,500 participants with preexisting depression and meeting inclusion criteria, 4,573 (11%) had occult OSA. In fully adjusted models, beneficiaries with occult OSA were heavier users of inpatient (rate ratio: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.39, 1.67), outpatient (rate ratio: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.27), emergency department (rate ratio: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.35, 1.63), and prescription (rate ratio: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.14) services. Mean total costs were also significantly higher among beneficiaries with occult OSA ($44,390; 95% CI: $32,076, $56,703). CITATION: Wickwire EM, Albrecht JS. Occult, undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea is associated with increased health care resource utilization and costs among older adults with comorbid depression: a retrospective cohort study among Medicare beneficiaries. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(5):817-819.

Financial Hardship and its Associations with Perceived Sleep Quality in Participants with Type 2 Diabetes and Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to explore social determinants of health (SDoH), and disease severity as predictors of sleep quality in persons with both Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: Disease severity was measured by Apnea-Hypopnea Index [(AHI) ≥ 5] and HbA1c for glycemic control. SDoH included subjective and objective financial hardship, race, sex, marital status, education, and age. Sleep quality was measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). RESULTS: The sample (N = 209) was middle-aged (57.6 ± 10.0); 66% White and 34% African American; and 54% men and 46% women. Participants carried a high burden of disease (mean AHI = 20.7 ± 18.1, mean HbA1c = 7.9% ± 1.7%). Disease severity was not significantly associated with sleep quality (all p >.05). Worse sleep quality was associated with both worse subjective (b = -1.54, p = .015) and objective (b = 2.58, p <.001) financial hardship. Characteristics significantly associated with both subjective and objective financial hardship included being African American, female, ≤ 2 years post high school, and of younger ages (all p < .01).Discussion: Financial hardship is a more important predictor of sleep quality than disease severity, age, sex, race, marital status, and educational attainment, in patients with OSA and T2D.

Economic evaluation of CPAP therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: a scoping review and evidence map.

PURPOSE: To synthesize findings of economic evaluations investigating cost-effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and of strategies of organization of care related to CPAP therapy. METHODS: Scoping review with searches conducted in MEDLINE, CRD, LILACS, and Embase in August 2020. Eligible studies were economic evaluations comparing CPAP to other alternative or assessing strategies of care for CPAP therapy. Results were presented narratively, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were presented in evidence maps. RESULTS: Of 34 studies, 3 concluded that CPAP is less costly and more effective when compared to usual care. Most studies indicated that CPAP is associated with better health outcomes, but at higher prices. ICER ranged from USD 316 to 98,793 per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained (median 16,499; IQR 8267 to 33,119). One study concluded that CPAP is more costly and less effective, when treatment is applied to all patients, regardless of disease severity. Variability of ICER was mainly due to definition of population and applied time horizons. When CPAP was compared to mandibular advancement device, ICER ranged from USD 21,153 to 361,028 (median 89,671; IQR 26,829 to 295,983), which represents the investment in CPAP therapy required to obtain one extra QALY. Three studies assessed the effects of organizing CPAP therapy in primary care, which was cost-effective or cost-saving. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to usual care, CPAP is cost-effective after the second year of treatment, when indicated for moderate-to-severe OSA. CPAP therapy may be even more cost-effective by using different strategies of organization of care. These findings may inform decision making related to CPAP reimbursement in health systems. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

Screening for primary aldosteronism in the hypertensive obstructive sleep apnea population is cost-saving.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend screening for primary aldosteronism in patients diagnosed with hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea. Recent studies have shown that adherence to these recommendations is extremely low. It has been suggested that cost is a barrier to implementation. No analysis has been done to rigorously evaluate the cost-effectiveness of widespread implementation of these guidelines. METHODS: We constructed a decision-analytic model to evaluate screening of the hypertensive obstructive sleep apnea population for primary aldosteronism as per guideline recommendations in comparison with current rates of screening. Probabilities, utility values, and costs were identified in the literature. Threshold and sensitivity analyses assessed robustness of the model. Costs were represented in 2020 US dollars and health outcomes in quality-adjusted life-years. The model assumed a societal perspective with a lifetime time horizon. RESULTS: Screening per guideline recommendations had an expected cost of $47,016 and 35.27 quality-adjusted life-years. Continuing at current rates of screening had an expected cost of $48,350 and 34.86 quality-adjusted life-years. Screening was dominant, as it was both less costly and more effective. These results were robust to sensitivity analysis of disease prevalence, test sensitivity, patient age, and expected outcome of medical or surgical treatment of primary aldosteronism. The screening strategy remained cost-effective even if screening were conservatively presumed to identify only 3% of new primary aldosteronism cases. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea, rigorous screening for primary aldosteronism is cost-saving due to cardiovascular risk averted. Cost should not be a barrier to improving primary aldosteronism screening adherence.

The effects of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein on the clinical outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP), and their respective impact on the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing off-pump cardiac artery bypass grafting (OPCABG). METHODS: We enrolled consecutive eligible patients listed for elective OPCABG who underwent cardiorespiratory polygraphy before surgery between January 2019 and December 2019 in this prospective observational single-center study. Baseline, intraoperative, and postoperative clinical data were compared between absent-mild and moderate-severe OSA groups. Regression analysis investigated the relationship between Hs-CRP level and severity of OSA, and further assessed the factors influencing postoperative atrial fibrillation, duration of hospitalization, and hospital cost. RESULTS: Patients with moderate-severe OSA accounted for 42.3% (52/123) of the cohort. Partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2), Hs-CRP, apnea hypopnea index (AHI), mean apnea time, maximum apnea time, and oxygen desaturation index ODI ≥ 3% were significantly higher in the moderate-severe OSA group than in the absent-mild OSA group. Left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF), lowest arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), and mean SaO2 were significantly lower in the moderate-severe OSA group. Moderate-severe OSA was associated with elevated Hs-CRP level (OR = 2.356, 95% CI 1.101-5.041, P = 0.027). Hs-CRP was an independent risk factor for post-CABG atrial fibrillation (POAF) (OR = 1.212, P = 0.01). Hs-CRP level independently correlated with duration of hospitalization (B = 0.456, P = 0.001) and hospital cost (B = 1.111, P = 0.044). CONCLUSION: Hs-CRP level was closely related to OSA severity and have potential utility in predicting POAF, duration of hospitalization, and hospital costs in patients undergoing OPCABG.

Characterizing Decisional Conflict in Patients Presenting to Sleep Surgery Clinic and an Exploration of Resource Limitations.

OBJECTIVES: Numerous therapies exist for adult obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), creating potential for patient decisional conflict (DC) that impacts treatment adherence and post-treatment regret. We evaluated the prevalence of elevated DC in OSA patients presenting for positive airway pressure (PAP) alternative therapies and identified gaps in available resources about OSA therapies. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed based on questionnaires completed by adult OSA patients presenting to an academic sleep surgery clinic from March to October 2020. Surveys examined sleep symptoms, sleep apnea treatment history, goals of therapy, and the SURE checklist, a validated 4-item DC screening scale. Additional qualitative data about OSA decision tool needs were queried with structured interviews in a smaller subset of patients. RESULTS: Among 100 respondents, 60 were open to multiple treatment options, whereas 22 were not interested in surgical treatment. Eighty-one respondents (81%) had elevated DC (SURE score < 4). High DC was not associated with CPAP history, OSA severity, or daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale score ≥ 10). Elevated DC was related to uncertainty regarding optimal treatment choice in 54% of respondents (n = 54), and lack of knowledge regarding risks and benefits of each treatment option in 71% (n = 71). Common themes identified in 9 interviewed patients suggested helpful resources should ideally compare treatment modalities and educate on surgery details, efficacy, and recovery. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of OSA patients presenting to sleep surgery clinics have elevated decisional conflict influenced by limited knowledge about options and the risks and benefits of each therapy. There is a need for decision tools that can reduce decisional conflict and promote equitable knowledge about PAP alternative OSA treatments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:2384-2390, 2021.

Treatment burden experienced by patients with obstructive sleep apnoea using continuous positive airway pressure therapy.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the treatment burden experienced by patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) who use continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. PARTICIPANTS: 18 patients (33.3% males, mean age 59.7±11.8 years) with OSA who use CPAP therapy were interviewed. METHODS: Patients treated with CPAP for OSA at a tertiary hospital outpatient clinic in Sydney, Australia, were invited to participate in an interview in person or via phone. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore the treatment burden associated with using CPAP. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using NVivo 12 qualitative analysis software. RESULTS: Four categories of OSA-specific treatment burden were identified: healthcare tasks, consequences of healthcare tasks, exacerbating and alleviating factors of treatment burden. Participants reported a significant burden associated with using CPAP, independently of how frequently they used their device. Common sources of their treatment burden included attending healthcare appointments, the financial cost of treatment, lifestyle changes, treatment-related side effects and general discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that there is a significant treatment burden associated with the use of CPAP, and that treatment non-adherence is not the only consequence of treatment burden. Other consequences include relationship burden, stigma and financial burden. It is important for physicians to identify other negative impacts of treatment burden in order to optimise the patient experience.

Health Preference Measures in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Undergoing Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy: Data from a Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: In patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), the preference-based, health-related quality of life in terms of utility has not been extensively studied. OBJECTIVE: To address this point, we compared the performance of different instruments assessing utility in patients with OSAS undergoing continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 208 patients with OSAS (28 women, mean ± SE age 54.4 ± 0.7 years, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) 51.9 ± 1.8/h, Epworth sleepiness score 13.4 ± 0.2) participating in a randomized trial of different CPAP modalities over 2 years were analyzed. Evaluations included sleep studies, Epworth sleepiness scale, and several utility instruments that measure subjective health preference on a scale ranging from 1 (most preferred and perfect health) to 0 (least preferred and very poor health). RESULTS: After 2 years of CPAP therapy, the mean ± SE AHI was 6.7 ± 1.5/h and Epworth score 7.9 ± 0.4, both p < 0.001 versus baseline. Baseline utilities and changes (95% confidence interval) after 2 years of CPAP therapy were EuroQol 5-dimensions 0.79 ± 0.01, 0.02 (0.00-0.05, p = 0.064); short-form 6-dimension medical outcome questionnaire 0.72 ± 0.01, 0.06 (0.04-0.08, p < 0.001); Euro-thermometer visual analog scale 0.70 ± 0.01, 0.09 (0.07-0.12, p < 0.001); time trade-off 0.82 ± 0.01, 0.03 (0.01-0.06, p = 0.002); and standard gamble 0.82 ± 0.01, -0.01 (-0.03 to 0.02, p = 0.712). CONCLUSION: The short-form 6-dimensions questionnaire, the Euro-thermometer, and the time trade-off instruments reflected the major clinical improvements in OSAS, while the EuroQoL 5-dimensions and standard gamble tests were not sensitive to CPAP effects. These results indicate that the evaluation of utility of a treatment for OSAS depends critically on the instrument used, which is important from an individual and societal perspective.

Persistent Obstructive Sleep Apnea Burden on Family Finances and Quality of Life.

OBJECTIVE: We previously found that financial concerns negatively affect the quality of life of families of children with persistent obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) after tonsillectomy. The goal is to quantify the financial impact on families of children with persistent OSA and assess contributing factors. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey study with comparison group. SETTING: Upper airway center at a tertiary pediatric hospital. METHODS: Participants included consecutive children with persistent OSA from September to October 2017. Healthy children seen in a general otolaryngology clinic served as controls. Families of both groups completed the Family Impact Questionnaire and the modified Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST). RESULTS: Families of the 50 patients (25 study and 25 control) completed the surveys: the mean age was 6.4 years (95% CI, 5.0-7.8), and 19 (38%) were female. There were no differences in age, sex, race, or insurance status between groups (P > .05). The mean apnea-hypopnea index for the study group was 7.9 events/h (range, 5.5-10.3), and 40% (10/25) had Down syndrome. Positive airway pressure and/or oxygen were used by 72% (18/25). The Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity for study patients (21.9; 95% CI, 14.8-26.0) was significantly lower than for controls (30.2; 95% CI, 26.6-30.8; P = .003), reflecting elevated financial toxicity. Study families reported greater financial impact on the Family Impact Questionnaire (8.4; 95% CI, 6.1-10.7) versus controls (3.6; 95% CI, 1.8-5.4; P = .002); concerns regarding missed days of work and school were common (30.7%). CONCLUSION: Families of children with persistent OSA reported a high financial burden related to their children's disease and were more likely to report financial toxicity than families of controls. Concern regarding missed work and school associated with appointments and treatment was a significant factor.

Reducing cost and time to diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea using ambulatory sleep study: a Singapore sleep centre experience.

PURPOSE: The current gold standard for diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is overnight in laboratory polysomnography (PSG). However, PSGs are expensive, labor-intensive, and have long wait times. An ambulatory sleep study device, the WatchPAT, has been shown to have high correlation for sleep indices measured compared with PSG (AASM, 2016). Use of the WatchPAT could potentially lead to shorter waiting times and earlier diagnosis of OSA (Lancet Resp Med 3:310-8, 2015). Our study aimed to investigate if WatchPAT reduces time to diagnosis and treatment of OSA in a tertiary healthcare setting. A secondary aim was to investigate the cost-benefit of an ambulatory sleep study. METHODS: All patients who underwent diagnostic sleep studies in a single tertiary institution from 2014 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline characteristics and time from ordering of sleep study to prescription of continuous positive airway pressure were recorded. Data were categorized into two groups by type of diagnostic sleep study, PSG, and WatchPAT. The time to treatment and cost for diagnosis of OSA were compared between groups with the Paired T test/Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Of 1898 patients who had diagnostic sleep studies over a 4-year period, 1660 patients (88%) underwent PSG and 238 patients (12%) underwent WatchPAT. Patients in the WatchPAT group had a shorter time to diagnosis (21 days versus 79.8 days, p < 0.001) and treatment (46.3 days versus 118.4 days, p < 0.001) compared to the PSG group. Cost-benefit calculation showed that this earlier treatment led to cost-saving of US $1179.50 per patient. CONCLUSION: An ambulatory sleep study is an option for earlier access to diagnosis and treatment of OSA with the potential of considerable cost savings.

Does Community Outsourcing Improve Timeliness of Care for Veterans With Obstructive Sleep Apnea?

BACKGROUND: Providing timely access to care has been a long-standing priority for the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System. Recent strategies to reduce long wait times have focused on purchasing community care by a fee-for-service model. Whether outsourcing Veterans Affairs (VA) specialty care to the community improves access is unclear. OBJECTIVES: We compared time from referral to treatment among Veterans whose care was provided by VA versus community care purchased by the VA, using obstructive sleep apnea as an example condition. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of Northern California Veterans seeking sleep apnea care through the San Francisco VA Healthcare System between 2012 and 2018. We used multivariable linear regression with propensity score matching to investigate the relationship between time to care delivery and care setting (VA provided vs. VA-purchased community care). A total of 1347 Northern California Veterans who completed sleep apnea testing within the VA and 88 Veterans who completed sleep apnea testing in the community had complete data for analysis. RESULTS: Among Northern California Veterans with obstructive sleep apnea, outsourcing of care to the community was associated with longer time from referral to therapy (mean±SD, 129.6±82.8 d with VA care vs. 252.0±158.8 d with community care, P<0.001) and greater loss to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that purchasing community care may lead to care fragmentation and not improve wait times nor improve access to subspecialty care for Veterans.

Protocol of a multicentre, prospective cohort study that evaluates cost-effectiveness of two perioperative care strategies for potential obstructive sleep apnoea in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery, OSA is undiagnosed in the majority of patients and thus untreated. While untreated OSA is associated with an increased risk of preoperative and postoperative complications, no evidence-based guidelines on perioperative care for these patients are available. The aim of the POPCORN study (Post-Operative Pulse oximetry without OSA sCreening vs perioperative continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment following OSA scReeNing by polygraphy (PG)) is to evaluate which perioperative strategy is the most cost-effective for obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery without a history of OSA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this multicentre observational cohort study, data from 1380 patients who will undergo bariatric surgery will be collected. Patients will receive either postoperative care with pulse oximetry monitoring and supplemental oxygen during the first postoperative night, or care that includes preoperative PG and CPAP treatment in case of moderate or severe OSA. Local protocols for perioperative care in each participating hospital will determine into which cohort a patient is placed. The primary outcome is cost-effectiveness, which will be calculated by comparing all healthcare costs with the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs, calculated using EQ-5D questionnaires). Secondary outcomes are mortality, complications within 30 days after surgery, readmissions, reoperations, length of stay, weight loss, generic quality of life (QOL), OSA-specific QOL, OSA symptoms and CPAP adherence. Patients will receive questionnaires before surgery and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery to report QALYs and other patient-reported outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval from the Medical Research Ethics Committees United was granted in accordance with the Dutch law for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) (reference number W17.050). Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at (inter)national conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR6991.

The Economic Burden of Comorbid Obstructive Sleep Apnea Among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) imposes a substantial burden on patients and the health care system. The presence of comorbid obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been shown to increase the risk of morbidity and mortality in patients with COPD. There is limited information available on the incremental economic burden of comorbid OSA among patients with COPD. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incremental health care resource utilization (HCRU) and direct medical costs associated with having comorbid OSA among individuals with COPD in a nationally representative commercially insured population in the United States. METHODS: We identified individuals with a diagnosis of COPD between January 2008 and December 2014, with and without OSA, from the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database. The index date was defined as the first claim with a diagnosis of COPD. All baseline characteristics were measured in the 12-month pre-index period, and all outcomes were measured in the 12-month post-index period. The odds of experiencing one or more hospitalizations and emergency room (ER) visits were compared between individuals with and without comorbid OSA using logistic regression models. Twelve-month total, physician office visit, and other outpatient costs were compared between individuals with and without OSA using generalized linear models. To account for a high proportion of zero costs, 2-part models were fit to examine inpatient, ER visit, and pharmacy costs. Average marginal costs were estimated to compare the costs of individuals with and without OSA. All costs represented direct medical costs from the health plan perspective. RESULTS: Following application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, the study sample included 85,940 individuals with COPD alone and 7,942 individuals with COPD and OSA. The odds of experiencing a hospitalization and an ER visit were significantly higher in the COPD-OSA cohort than in the COPD-only cohort (hospitalization OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 13531.38-1.53; ER visit OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.18-1.30). The average difference in total cost between individuals with and without comorbid OSA was $8,144 (95% CI = $7,295-$8,993). The average difference in costs for physician office visits and other outpatient services was $392 (95% CI = $351-$433) and $2,831 (95% CI = $2,463-$3,200), respectively. Among individuals with a non-zero, strictly positive inpatient cost, the average difference in inpatient costs was $2,792 (95% CI = $1,354-$4,230). Similarly, among individuals with strictly positive pharmacy and ER costs, the average difference in costs between individuals with and without comorbid OSA was $1,772 (95% CI = $1,590-$1,953) and $144 (95% CI = $101-$188), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Total medical cost and costs for inpatient, ER, pharmacy, physician office visit, and other outpatient services were higher among COPD patients with comorbid OSA compared to patients without. The economic burden of comorbid OSA among patients with COPD in the commercially insured U.S. population is substantial. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. Onukwugha reports grants from Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals and Pfizer, unrelated to this work. Slejko reports grants from PhRMA, the PhRMA Foundation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals, along with a teaching honorarium from Pfizer, unrelated to this work. Hong has nothing to disclose.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Preoperative Screening Strategies for Obstructive Sleep Apnea among Patients Undergoing Elective Inpatient Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea is underdiagnosed in surgical patients. The cost-effectiveness of obstructive sleep apnea screening is unknown. This study's objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of preoperative obstructive sleep apnea screening (1) perioperatively and (2) including patients' remaining lifespans. METHODS: An individual-level Markov model was constructed to simulate the perioperative period and lifespan of patients undergoing inpatient elective surgery. Costs (2016 Canadian dollars) were calculated from the hospital perspective in a single-payer health system. Remaining model parameters were derived from a structured literature search. Candidate strategies included: (1) no screening; (2) STOP-Bang questionnaire alone; (3) STOP-Bang followed by polysomnography (STOP-Bang + polysomnography); and (4) STOP-Bang followed by portable monitor (STOP-Bang + portable monitor). Screen-positive patients (based on STOP-Bang cutoff of at least 3) received postoperative treatment modifications and expedited definitive testing. Effectiveness was expressed as quality-adjusted life month in the perioperative analyses and quality-adjusted life years in the lifetime analyses. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. RESULTS: In perioperative and lifetime analyses, no screening was least costly and least effective. STOP-Bang + polysomnography was the most effective strategy and was more cost-effective than both STOP-Bang + portable monitor and STOP-Bang alone in both analyses. In perioperative analyses, STOP-Bang + polysomnography was not cost-effective compared to no screening at the $4,167/quality-adjusted life month threshold (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio $52,888/quality-adjusted life month). No screening was favored in more than 90% of iterations in probabilistic sensitivity analyses. In contrast, in lifetime analyses, STOP-Bang + polysomnography was favored compared to no screening at the $50,000/quality-adjusted life year threshold (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio $2,044/quality-adjusted life year). STOP-Bang + polysomnography was favored in most iterations at thresholds above $2,000/quality-adjusted life year in probabilistic sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness of preoperative obstructive sleep apnea screening differs depending on time horizon. Preoperative screening with STOP-Bang followed by immediate confirmatory testing with polysomnography is cost-effective on the lifetime horizon but not the perioperative horizon. The integration of preoperative screening based on STOP-Bang and polysomnography is a cost-effective means of mitigating the long-term disease burden of obstructive sleep apnea.

Impact of a shift in treatment funding on a multidisciplinary sleep clinic: a cohort study.

Multidisciplinary Sleep Clinics for sleep apnea have long existed, bringing together neurologists, sleep specialists, dentists, orthodontists and surgeons. In Belgium, a shift in funding for obstructive sleep apnea treatment was implemented from January 1st, 2017. Funding was allowed for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea and the rules shifted for treatments delivery and monitoring by authorised medical opinion. We aimed to assess whether a shift in treatment funding was associated with a change in the multidisciplinary sleep practice. Sample consisted of all patients discussed in the sleep multidisciplinary team meetings of the University Hospital of Liege from January 2016 to December 2018. Interrupted times series, Mann-Whitney U tests and descriptive statistics were produced. There were no differences in patients age, male sex preponderance, body mass index, clinical presentation and level of obstruction. Baseline obstructive sleep apnea severity was significantly lower (mean apnea-hypopnea index and mean oxygen desaturation index lowered with p = 0.0189 and p = 0.0466, respectively) after the funding rules changed. Oral appliance and ENT surgery were more often offered after the shift in funding. The key changes of the new funding rules for obstructive sleep apnea were reflected in the patient selection and management by sleep multidisciplinary team meeting. Funding terms could influence the care we give, not only in treatment options, but also in patients selection.