Genito-urinary infectious adverse events related to sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors: a network meta-analysis and meta-regression.

INTRODUCTION: Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are an emerging class of drugs with wide indications. Controversial evidence exists regarding the risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) and genital infections (GI) with SGLT2is paving way for undertaking this network meta-analysis and meta-regression study. METHODS: Data from randomized trials evaluating SGLT2is reporting the number of patients with UTI and GI were included. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were the effect estimates. Meta-regression analysis identified risk factors. Number needed to harm (NNH) was estimated. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-four articles were included [UTI (213 studies; 150,140 participants) and GI (188 studies; 121,275 participants)]. An increased risk of UTI (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.16) and GI (OR: 3.5, 95% CI: 3.1, 3.9) was observed. Men showed a lower risk of UTI (OR: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.2, 0.3) and GI (OR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.4, 0.5). Meta-regression analyses revealed BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and duration of SGLT2i treatment for ≥6 months as risk factors. NNH was 16 for UTI and 25 for GI. CONCLUSION: SGLT2is increase the risk of UTI and GI that needs to be incorporated in the treatment guidelines with precautions in high-risk patients. PROSPECTIVE PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: https://osf.io/5fwyk.

Evaluating the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin addition to insulin and oral antidiabetic medication (OAD) regimen in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes and obese patients.

Insulin resistance complicates diabetes care. Its effectiveness and tolerability as an addition to metformin, DPP4 inhibitor and insulin treatment in type 2 diabetic patients will be examined in this research. Participants with type 2 diabetes from poor socio-economic backgrounds had HbA1c values ≥8.5% when using Insulin+Metformin+DPP-4 inhibitors. They received 10mg Empagliflozin daily for 12 weeks (n=143). The main outcome was change in HbA1c at 12th week from baseline. Secondary outcomes were baseline weight and week 12 FPG. Adjusted mean (SE) HbA1c increases at week 12 were: Mean ± SD 10.38 (6.8-17.0) vs. Mean±SD 9.05±1.77 (5.60-16.0) with empagliflozin 10mg. When added to the regimen, empagliflozin significantly reduced FPG, systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The mean (SE) BMI increases from baseline were 31.28±5.89 (16.0-66.0) and 29.73±5.47 (3.0-46.0) with 10mg empagliflozin. Two individuals experienced urinary tract infections as AEs, but no genital infections. Adding empagliflozin 10mg daily to metformin+DPP4 inhibitor+insulin improved glycemic control, body weight and blood pressure for 12 weeks. The intervention was well-tolerated, highlighting empagliflozin's therapeutic potential.

Comparative effectiveness of second line oral antidiabetic treatments among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: emulation of a target trial using routinely collected health data.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of three commonly prescribed oral antidiabetic drugs added to metformin for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus requiring second line treatment in routine clinical practice. DESIGN: Cohort study emulating a comparative effectiveness trial (target trial). SETTING: Linked primary care, hospital, and death data in England, 2015-21. PARTICIPANTS: 75 739 adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus who initiated second line oral antidiabetic treatment with a sulfonylurea, DPP-4 inhibitor, or SGLT-2 inhibitor added to metformin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was absolute change in glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) between baseline and one year follow-up. Secondary outcomes were change in body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at one year and two years, change in HbA1c at two years, and time to ≥40% decline in eGFR, major adverse kidney event, hospital admission for heart failure, major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), and all cause mortality. Instrumental variable analysis was used to reduce the risk of confounding due to unobserved baseline measures. RESULTS: 75 739 people initiated second line oral antidiabetic treatment with sulfonylureas (n=25 693, 33.9%), DPP-4 inhibitors (n=34 464 ,45.5%), or SGLT-2 inhibitors (n=15 582, 20.6%). SGLT-2 inhibitors were more effective than DPP-4 inhibitors or sulfonylureas in reducing mean HbA1c values between baseline and one year. After the instrumental variable analysis, the mean differences in HbA1c change between baseline and one year were -2.5 mmol/mol (95% confidence interval (CI) -3.7 to -1.3) for SGLT-2 inhibitors versus sulfonylureas and -3.2 mmol/mol (-4.6 to -1.8) for SGLT-2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors. SGLT-2 inhibitors were more effective than sulfonylureas or DPP-4 inhibitors in reducing BMI and systolic blood pressure. For some secondary endpoints, evidence for SGLT-2 inhibitors being more effective was lacking-the hazard ratio for MACE, for example, was 0.99 (95% CI 0.61 to 1.62) versus sulfonylureas and 0.91 (0.51 to 1.63) versus DPP-4 inhibitors. SGLT-2 inhibitors had reduced hazards of hospital admission for heart failure compared with DPP-4 inhibitors (0.32, 0.12 to 0.90) and sulfonylureas (0.46, 0.20 to 1.05). The hazard ratio for a ≥40% decline in eGFR indicated a protective effect versus sulfonylureas (0.42, 0.22 to 0.82), with high uncertainty in the estimated hazard ratio versus DPP-4 inhibitors (0.64, 0.29 to 1.43). CONCLUSIONS: This emulation study of a target trial found that SGLT-2 inhibitors were more effective than sulfonylureas or DPP-4 inhibitors in lowering mean HbA1c, BMI, and systolic blood pressure and in reducing the hazards of hospital admission for heart failure (v DPP-4 inhibitors) and kidney disease progression (v sulfonylureas), with no evidence of differences in other clinical endpoints.

Effects of glucose-lowering drugs on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: an update.

INTRODUCTION: Over the last few years, there has been a substantial increase in the data available about the benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in improving cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Very little new information is available for the other groups of glucose-lowering drugs. AREAS COVERED: This brief report summarizes the recent information about the respective benefits of the two newer groups of glucose-lowering drugs and the effects on cardiovascular risk factors that may be involved in these benefits. The articles reviewed were identified by a Medline search. EXPERT OPINION: Recent guidelines recommend SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 RAs with proven cardiovascular disease benefits as potential first line treatment for patients with T2D and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or those with high risk of ASCVD or with chronic kidney disease or heart failure. Both groups of drugs have been shown to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events, but the mechanisms vary between them. SGLT2 inhibitors are preferred for the treatment and prevention of heart failure and chronic kidney disease, whereas GLP-1 RAs are more effective in reducing body weight and improving glycemic control in patients with T2D.

Effect of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, DWP16001, as an add-on therapy to insulin for diabetic dogs: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a novel class of anti-hyperglycaemic agents. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and the adjuvant glycaemic control effect of an SGLT2 inhibitor, DWP16001, in diabetic dogs receiving insulin treatment. METHODS: Nineteen diabetic dogs receiving insulin treatment (NPH, porcine lente and glargine insulin) were divided into two groups according to dosing frequency: DWP TOD group (n = 10) and DWP SID group (n = 9). In the DWP TOD group, 0.025 mg/kg of DWP16001 was administered once every 3 days, whereas, in the DWP SID group, 0.025 mg/kg of DWP16001 was administered once a day. Food intake was maintained during the trial period. Hypoglycaemia, ketoacidosis or unexpected life-threatening reactions were assessed as adverse effects before and after DWP16001 administration. We compared insulin requirement reduction and blood glucose level control between two groups. RESULTS: No specific adverse effects were observed during the clinical trial, and haematological parameter remained unchanged. Moreover, the fasting glucose levels and daily insulin dose in the DWP TOD group were lower than the pre-administration values, but not significantly different for 8 weeks. Systolic blood pressure, fructosamine and insulin dose decreased significantly in the DWP SID group compared to the DWP TOD group at 8 weeks (p < 0.05) without affecting food consumption. Among these patients, 10 patients were monitored while receiving DWP16001 for 12 months (DWP TOD group n = 5, DWP SID group n = 5). The fasting glucose and fructosamine levels and daily insulin dose were reduced in both groups at 12 months compared with those before receiving DWP16001. CONCLUSION: When DWP16001, an SGLT2 inhibitor, was supplied to dogs with type 1 diabetes, no adverse effects were observed, and it was confirmed that the administered insulin dose can be reduced in controlling blood glucose.

A Randomized Crossover Trial of Mixed Meal Tolerance Test Response in People with Type 1 Diabetes on Insulin Pump Therapy and YG1699 or Dapagliflozin.

YG1699 is a novel inhibitor of sodium-glucose cotransporter 1 (SGLT1) and SGLT2. This double-blind, 3-way crossover trial compared YG1699 to dapagliflozin as an adjunct to insulin in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) on insulin pump therapy. Treatment periods included four mixed meal tolerance tests (MMTTs) and insulin withdrawal tests per person. Nineteen adults with T1D were randomized to YG1699 10 mg, YG1699 25 mg, and dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily for 1 week in different orders. The primary end point was the difference in area under the curve (AUC) in plasma glucose (AUC0-120min) after an MMTT between treatment groups. Mean change in plasma glucose after an MMTT (AUC0-120min) was lower for YG1699 10 mg vs. dapagliflozin (89.51% of baseline vs. 102.13%, 90% confidence interval (CI) vs. dapagliflozin, -6% to -16%, P = 0.0003) and for YG1699 25 mg (84.83% vs. 102.13%, 90% CI vs. dapagliflozin -13% to -22%, P < 0.0001). At 120 minutes, mean glucose values on no treatment, dapagliflozin, YG1699 10 mg, and YG1699 25 mg were 149 (SE 7.6), 141 (SE 6.1), 128 (SE 6.9), and 115 (SE 7.8) mg/dL, respectively. Insulin dose requirements were lower for YG1699 10 mg and 25 mg vs. dapagliflozin for bolus insulin, and for YG1699 10 mg vs. dapagliflozin for total daily insulin. Safety profiles were similar between treatment groups. YG1699 reduced post-prandial glucose more than dapagliflozin in people with T1D on insulin pump therapy. The results were consistent with dual SGLT1/SGLT2 inhibition by YG1699.

A 52-week efficacy and safety study of enavogliflozin versus dapagliflozin as an add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: ENHANCE-M extension study.

AIM: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of enavogliflozin 0.3 mg/day added to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After 24 weeks of a randomized, double-blind treatment period with enavogliflozin 0.3 mg/day (n = 101) or dapagliflozin 10 mg/day (n = 99) added to metformin, all patients received enavogliflozin 0.3 mg/day plus metformin for an additional 28 weeks during the open-label extension period. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients continued enavogliflozin (maintenance group), and 77 were switched from dapagliflozin to enavogliflozin (switch group). All adverse drug reactions (ADR) were mild in severity. In the maintenance group, ADRs (cystitis and vaginal infection) were reported in two patients (2.44%) during 52 weeks. In the switch group, ADR (hypoglycaemia) was reported in one patient (1.30%) during a 28-week open-label extension period. At week 52, glycated haemoglobin and fasting plasma glucose were significantly lower than at the baseline, by 0.85% and 29.08 mg/dl, respectively, in the maintenance group (p < .0001 for both), and by 0.81% and 32.77 mg/dl, respectively, in the switch group (p < .0001 for both). At week 52, 68.92% of patients from the maintenance group and 64.29% from the switch group achieved glycated haemoglobin <7%. A significant increase in the urine glucose-creatinine ratio was observed at week 52, by 58.81 g/g and 63.77 g/g in the maintenance and switch groups, respectively (p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Enavogliflozin added to metformin was tolerated well for up to 52 weeks and provided continual glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus, along with a significant increase in the urine glucose-creatinine ratio.

Non-steroidal mineralocorticoid antagonists and hyperkalemia monitoring in chronic kidney disease patients associated with type II diabetes: a narrative review.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a prevalent complication of Type II diabetes (T2D). The coexistence of CKD with T2D is comparable to cardiovascular disease (CVD) when the estimated glomerular filtration rate declines below 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Screening and early detection of people with high risk for CKD would be beneficial in managing CKD progress and the associated complications such as CV complications. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) have demonstrated beneficial effects in delaying CKD progression, but they carry the risk of hyperkalemia. Nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid antagonists (nsMRA), such as finerenone, exhibit considerable efficacy in their anti-inflammatory, antifibrotic, and renal protective effects with demonstrable reductions in CV complications. In addition, nsMRAs do not cause significant changes in serum potassium levels compared to traditional steroidal MRA. Ongoing research explores the capacity of the sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i), combined with nsMRA, to produce synergistic renal protective effects and reduce the risk of hyperkalemia. Also, a dedicated renal outcomes study (FLOW study) involving a once-weekly injectable Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, semaglutide, was halted early by the data monitoring committee due to having achieved the predefined efficacy endpoint and considerations related to renal disease. In CKD patients with T2D on nsMRA, hyperkalemia management requires a comprehensive approach involving lifestyle adjustments, dietary modifications, regular serum potassium level monitoring, and potassium binders, if necessary. Withholding or down-titration of nsMRAs with close monitoring of serum potassium levels may be required in patients with concerning potassium levels. In light of the current state of knowledge, this review article explores the perspectives and approaches that HCPs may consider when monitoring and managing hyperkalemia in CKD patients with T2D.

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a common and serious problem among people with Type II Diabetes (T2D). People who have CKD with T2D are at a higher risk for heart disease after normal kidney function declines below certain levels. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors are a group of medications that can help delay CKD progression but may cause a rise in circulating potassium levels. Nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid antagonist (nsMRA), such as finerenone, can reduce kidney inflammation and damage, with noted cardiovascular benefits, and with less effect on serum potassium levels as compared to their steroid-based counterparts. Researchers are studying whether combining blood sugar medications such as sodium-glucose transport protein-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and finerenone can help protect the kidneys and heart. They also want to see if this combination can prevent high potassium levels. This article talks about ways to check and monitor potassium levels in CKD patients with T2D who may be taking nsMRA. To manage high potassium levels in people with CKD and T2D, doctors may suggest lifestyle changes, dietary adjustments, potassium-lowering medication, or adjustment of other medications with close monitoring of potassium levels.

Relevance of GLP-1 receptor agonists or SGLT-2 inhibitors on the recruitment for clinical studies in patients with NAFLD.

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines increasingly recommend the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) or sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) to prevent cardiovascular and cardiorenal endpoints. Both drugs also show beneficial effects in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Preexisting GLP-1 RA and SGLT2i therapies are frequently defined as exclusion criterion in clinical studies to avoid confounding effects. We therefore investigated how this might limit recruitment and design of NAFLD studies. METHODS: GLP-1 RA and SGLT2i prescriptions were analyzed in NAFLD patients with diabetes mellitus recruited at a tertiary referral center and from the population-based LIFE-Adult-Study. Individuals were stratified according to noninvasive parameters of liver fibrosis based on vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE). RESULTS: 97 individuals were recruited at tertiary care and 473 from the LIFE-Adult-Study. VCTE was available in 97/97 and 147/473 cases.GLP-1 RA or SGLT2i were used in 11.9% of the population-based cohort (LSM < 8 kPa), but in 32.0% with LSM ≥ 8 kPa. In the tertiary clinic, it was 30.9% overall, independent of LSM, and 36.8% in patients with medium and high risk for fibrotic NASH (FAST score > 0.35). At baseline, 3.1% of the patients in tertiary care were taking GLP-1 RA and 4.1% SGLT2i. Four years later, the numbers had increased to 15.5% and 21.6%. CONCLUSION: GLP-1 RA and SGLT2i are frequently and increasingly prescribed. In candidates for liver biopsy for NASH studies (VCTE ≥ 8 kPa) the use of them exceeds 30%, which needs careful consideration when designing NASH trials.

Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Sitagliptin to Ipragliflozin in Obese Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Single-Arm Multicenter Interventional Study.

BACKGROUND: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors have limited efficacy in improving glycemic control for obese Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors are recommended for use in patients with type 2 diabetes with obesity. Nevertheless, there has been no previously published study on the effect of switching from dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors to sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors on the systemic and organic effects in obese Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of switching from sitagliptin to ipragliflozin for 24 weeks in obese Japanese patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Fifty-one obese patients with type 2 diabetes (body mass index > 25 kg/m2) treated with sitagliptin (50 mg) and metformin but with inadequate glycemic control (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c] > 7.5% and < 9.0%) were enrolled. After a 4-week observation period, sitagliptin was switched to ipragliflozin (50 mg) for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c from baseline to the end of treatment. The secondary outcomes were changes in clinical characteristics and other biochemical variables. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients with an average HbA1c of 8.37 ± 0.48% and body mass index of 28.8 ± 3.8 kg/m2 were enrolled. Fifty patients completed the study, one patient stopped ipragliflozin at 4 weeks because of the development of hyperosmolar hyperglycemic syndrome. No significant change in HbA1c from baseline to the end of treatment was observed (- 0.02 ± 0.75%). However, fasting plasma glucose was reduced (- 16.2 ± 28.4 mg/dL, p < 0.001), and biochemical variables associated with insulin resistance, oxidative stress, and hepatic and renal functions showed significant improvements. No severe adverse effects were observed, except in the one aforementioned case. CONCLUSIONS: Switching from sitagliptin to ipragliflozin did not alter HbA1c in obese patients with type 2 diabetes, while improving parameters related to organ homeostasis. These data provide novel information useful for selecting oral anti-diabetic agents for patients with type 2 diabetes with obesity, a risk factor for developing various complications of diabetes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials identifier: jRCT#031190022.

Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter Type 2 Inhibitors and Heart Failure: A Review of the State of the Art / Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa Tipo 2 e Insuficiencia Cardíaca: Una Revisión del Estado del Arte

Heart Failure (HF) is a cardiovascular condition with high morbidity and mortality that conditions one of the most critical problems in public health. Despite advances in recent decades, patients continue to have major cardiovascular events and marked reduction in their quality of life. Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter Type 2 Inhibitors (SGLT2 Inhibitors) initially entered the market to treat hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), however the discovery of the cardiovascular benefits in patients with HF, regardless of the presence or absence of T2DM positioned it as a new pillar in clinical management.In this state-of-the-art review resulting from a comprehensive literature search (Medline, Cochrane and EMBASE), we describe the impact of SGLT2 Inhibitors on mortality and rehospitalizations in patients with HF and we propose a therapeutic plan for patients with HF to maximizes the benefits. (AU)

La Insuficiencia Cardíaca (IC) es una condición cardiovascular con alta morbilidad y mortalidad que condiciona uno de los problemas más críticos en salud pública. A pesar de los avances en las últimas décadas, los pacientes continúan presentando eventos cardiovasculares importantes y una marcada reducción de su calidad de vida. Los inhibidores del cotransportador de sodio-glucosa tipo 2 (SGLT2) ingresaron inicialmente al mercado para tratar la hiperglucemia en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (DMT2), sin embargo, el descubrimiento de los beneficios cardiovasculares en pacientes con IC, independientemente de la presencia o ausencia de DMT2, lo posicionó como un nuevo pilar en manejo clínico.Esta revisión de la literatura es resultante de una búsqueda bibliográfica exhaustiva (Medline, Cochrane y EMBASE), y describimos el impacto de los iSGLT2 en la mortalidad y rehospitalizaciones en pacientes con IC y proponemos un plan terapéutico para pacientes con IC para maximizar los beneficios. (AU)

Safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in very elderly diabetic type 2 patients in real life / Seguridad de los inhibidores de SGLT2 en pacientes diabéticos tipo 2 muy ancianos en la vida real

Introduction: Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are the latest antidiabetic treatments that reduces mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. Its use in real life in very elderly patients is limited by its possible side effects.Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients treated with SGLT2i in our community (La Rioja) since 2014. The safety (adverse effects) and prognosis (mortality, cardiac decompensation, and cardiovascular events) during the first 24 months of treatment were evaluated.Results: We included 235 patients treated with SGLT2i, 114 of them were men (48.5%), and the mean age was 79.6 ± 3.9 years. The most used SGLT2i was empagliflozin (55.7%). The mean Hb1Ac at the time of inclusion was 7.9 ± 1.4, showing a decrease in 47.7% of the included patients during the follow up. The initial values of creatinine and glomerular filtration rate at the time of inclusion (0.94 ± 0.3 and 68.3 ± 16.4) presented an improvement at 24 months of treatment (0.94 ± 0.27 and 68.2 ± 15.8). During follow-up, 94 adverse events were described in 84 patients, and 53 treatment suspensions. This adverse events were related with sex (p 0.004), dapagliflozin (p < 0.001) and initial Hb1Ac values (p 0.04). The most common adverse event were genitourinary infections (63), followed by acute kidney injury (9), being the latter the most frequent cause of treatment interruption. Symptomatic hypoglycaemia during the follow-up was related with treatment of insulin, age and Hb1Ac (p <0.01).Conclusions: Treatment with SGLT2i is a safe and well-tolerated treatment in very elderly patients in real life. Genitourinary infections are the most common adverse events, but those that less frequently cause treatment interruption. (AU)

Introducción: Los inhibidores del cotransportador de sodio y glucosa tipo 2 (SGLT2i) son los últimos tratamientos antidiabéticos que reducen la mortalidad y los resultados cardiovasculares. Su uso en la vida real en pacientes muy ancianos está limitado por sus posibles efectos secundarios.Material y métodos: Realizamos un estudio retrospectivo de pacientes tratados con iSGLT2 en nuestra comunidad (La Rioja) desde 2014. La seguridad (efectos adversos) y el pronóstico (mortalidad, descompensación cardiaca y eventos cardiovasculares) durante los primeros 24 meses de tratamiento fueron evaluado.Resultados: Se incluyeron 235 pacientes tratados con SGLT2i, 114 de ellos hombres (48,5%) y la edad media fue de 79,6 ± 3,9 años. El SGLT2i más utilizado fue la empagliflozina (55,7%). La Hb1Ac media en el momento de la inclusión fue de 7,9 ± 1,4, mostrando un descenso en el 47,7% de los pacientes incluidos durante el seguimiento. Los valores iniciales de creatinina y filtrado glomerular en el momento de la inclusión (0,94 ± 0,3 y 68,3 ± 16,4) presentaron una mejoría a los 24 meses de tratamiento (0,94 ± 0,27 y 68,2 ± 15,8). Durante el seguimiento se describieron 94 eventos adversos en 84 pacientes y 53 suspensiones del tratamiento. Estos eventos adversos se relacionaron con el sexo (p 0,004), dapagliflozina (p < 0,001) y valores iniciales de Hb1Ac (p 0,04). El evento adverso más frecuente fueron las infecciones genitourinarias (63), seguidas de la insuficiencia renal aguda (9), siendo esta última la causa más frecuente de interrupción del tratamiento. La hipoglucemia sintomática durante el seguimiento se relacionó con el tratamiento de insulina, la edad y la Hb1Ac (p <0,01).Conclusiones: El tratamiento con SGLT2i es un tratamiento seguro y bien tolerado en pacientes muy ancianos en la vida real. Las infecciones genitourinarias son los eventos adversos más frecuentes, pero los que con menor frecuencia provocan la interrupción del tratamiento. (AU)

Empagliflozin Enhances Autophagy, Mitochondrial Biogenesis, and Antioxidant Defense and Ameliorates Renal Ischemia/Reperfusion in Nondiabetic Rats.

BACKGROUND: Recent meta-analyses have shown that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors alleviate chronic kidney disease and acute kidney injury in diabetic patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of empagliflozin on renal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) in nondiabetic rats and find the possible mechanisms. Experimental Approach. Eighteen male Wistar rats were randomly divided into three groups, including healthy control, ischemic control, and empagliflozin-treated group. Thirty minutes of bilateral renal ischemia was induced by clamping the renal hilum. Forty-eight hours after reopening the clamps, rats' blood samples and tissue specimens were collected. Empagliflozin 10 mg/kg was administered by gavage, 2 hours before ischemia and 24 hours after the first dose. RESULTS: I/R injury led to a significant rise in serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen which was significantly decreased after treatment with empagliflozin. Empagliflozin also alleviated tubulointerstitial and glomerular damage and significantly decreased tissue histology scores. Empagliflozin decreased the increased levels of malondialdehyde, interleukin 1ß, and tumor necrosis factor α. SGLT2 inhibition increased the decreased expression of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 and PPARG coactivator 1 alpha that conduct antioxidant defense and mitochondrial biogenesis, respectively. Furthermore, empagliflozin markedly increased LC3-II/LC3-I and bcl2/bax ratios, showing its beneficial effect on activation of autophagy and inhibition of apoptosis. Despite its effects on diabetic nephropathy, empagliflozin did not activate the Sestrin2/AMP-activated protein kinase pathway in this study. CONCLUSION: Empagliflozin improved renal I/R injury in nondiabetic rats in this study by promoting autophagy and mitochondrial biogenesis and attenuation of oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis.

Dapagliflozin Ameliorates the Formation and Progression of Experimental Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms by Reducing Aortic Inflammation in Mice.

BACKGROUND: Dapagliflozin, a sodium glucose transporter protein-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor, reduces the risk for cardiovascular diseases. However, the influence of dapagliflozin on nondissecting abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) remains unclear. METHODS: AAAs were created in male C57BL/6 mice via intra-aortic porcine pancreatic elastase (PPE) infusion. Mice were daily treated with dapagliflozin (1 or 5 mg/kg body weight) or an equal volume of vehicle through oral gavage beginning one day prior to PPE infusion for 14 days. To investigate its translational value, dapagliflozin or vehicle was also administered to mice with existing AAAs in another cohort. Aortic diameters were measured prior to (day 0 for baseline) and 14 days after PPE infusion. After sacrifice, mice aortae were collected, and following histological analyses were performed. RESULTS: Dapagliflozin treatment significantly reduced aneurysmal aortic expansion following PPE infusion as compared to vehicle treatment especially at 5 mg/kg body weight (approximately 21% and 33% decreases in 1 and 5 mg/kg treatment groups, respectively). The dose-dependent attenuation of AAAs by dapagliflozin was also confirmed on histological analyses. Dapagliflozin remarkably reduced aortic accumulation of macrophages, CD4+ T cells, and B cells particularly following dapagliflozin treatment at 5 mg/kg. Dapagliflozin treatment also markedly attenuated medial SMC loss. Though the difference was not significant, dapagliflozin treatment tended to attenuate CD8+ T cells and elastin degradation. Dapagliflozin treatment at 5 mg/kg caused a 53% reduction in neovessel density. Furthermore, dapagliflozin treatment mitigated further progress of existing AAAs. CONCLUSION: Dapagliflozin treatment ameliorated PPE-induced AAAs by inhibiting aortic leukocytes infiltration and angiogenesis.

Effect of empagliflozin on coronary microvascular function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus-A randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over study.

PURPOSE: Results from large scale cardiovascular outcome trials in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) have found that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) reduce cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure, but the mechanisms behind the beneficial cardiovascular effects are not fully understood. We tested the hypothesis that the SGLT2i, empagliflozin, improves non-endothelial dependent coronary microvascular function, thereby leading to better cardiac function. METHODS: Patients with DM2 followed at the endocrinology outpatient clinic at Bispebjerg University Hospital were included in a double blinded, placebo-controlled cross-over study. Participants were allocated equally to each treatment sequence using simple randomization and treated with empagliflozin 25 mg and placebo for 12 weeks, interrupted by 2 weeks wash-out period. The primary outcome was coronary microvascular function, assessed as coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) and measured with transthoracic doppler echocardiography. Echocardiographic parameters of cardiac function were measured, and blood samples were analyzed for a broad panel of cardiovascular biomarkers. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were randomized to each sequence and 10 and 9 completed the study according to protocol, respectively, and were included in the analysis of outcome parameters. We found no improvement in CFVR (change in the empagliflozin period was -0.16 (SD 0.58)). There were no effects on cardiac systolic function or indicators of cardiac filling pressure. Well-known effects of empagliflozin were obtained, such as weight loss and reduction in Hba1c level. Creatinine level increased but remained within normal range. We observed a clear trend of reduction in cardiovascular biomarkers after empagliflozin treatment and increased levels after the placebo period. No serious adverse reactions were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Despite effect on weight-loss, Hba1c and biomarkers, treatment with empagliflozin for 12 weeks did not improve CFVR in patients with DM2.

SGLT2 inhibitors therapy protects glucotoxicity-induced ß-cell failure in a mouse model of human KATP-induced diabetes through mitigation of oxidative and ER stress.

Progressive loss of pancreatic ß-cell functional mass and anti-diabetic drug responsivity are classic findings in diabetes, frequently attributed to compensatory insulin hypersecretion and ß-cell exhaustion. However, loss of ß-cell mass and identity still occurs in mouse models of human KATP-gain-of-function induced Neonatal Diabetes Mellitus (NDM), in the absence of insulin secretion. Here we studied the temporal progression and mechanisms underlying glucotoxicity-induced loss of functional ß-cell mass in NDM mice, and the effects of sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) therapy. Upon tamoxifen induction of transgene expression, NDM mice rapidly developed severe diabetes followed by an unexpected loss of insulin content, decreased proinsulin processing and increased proinsulin at 2-weeks of diabetes. These early events were accompanied by a marked increase in ß-cell oxidative and ER stress, without changes in islet cell identity. Strikingly, treatment with the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin restored insulin content, decreased proinsulin:insulin ratio and reduced oxidative and ER stress. However, despite reduction of blood glucose, dapagliflozin therapy was ineffective in restoring ß-cell function in NDM mice when it was initiated at >40 days of diabetes, when loss of ß-cell mass and identity had already occurred. Our data from mouse models demonstrate that: i) hyperglycemia per se, and not insulin hypersecretion, drives ß-cell failure in diabetes, ii) recovery of ß-cell function by SGLT2 inhibitors is potentially through reduction of oxidative and ER stress, iii) SGLT2 inhibitors revert/prevent ß-cell failure when used in early stages of diabetes, but not when loss of ß-cell mass/identity already occurred, iv) common execution pathways may underlie loss and recovery of ß-cell function in different forms of diabetes. These results may have important clinical implications for optimal therapeutic interventions in individuals with diabetes, particularly for those with long-standing diabetes.

Manejo de perfiles de pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo2 en la práctica clínica de la atención primaria en España: Programa CONTROVERTI2 / Management of patient profiles with type2 diabetes mellitus in Primary Care in Spain: CONTROVERTI2 Program

Objetivo: Identificar controversias existentes en el manejo habitual de los pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo2 (DM2) y contrastarlas con la última evidencia científica y guías clínicas, con el fin de optimizar y homogeneizar el tratamiento de los pacientes con DM2 en la atención primaria (AP) en España. Material y métodos: 240 médicos de familia respondieron a un cuestionario online sobre el manejo de 6 perfiles de pacientes con DM2 de complejidad creciente. Resultados: Los factores clínicos más influyentes en la elección del tratamiento antihiperglucémico son una HbA1c >10% y la presencia de enfermedad cardiovascular (ECV), aunque en el paciente evolucionado cobran más relevancia la tasa de filtrado glomerular estimada y el riesgo de hipoglucemia. En el paciente recién diagnosticado con HbA1c>9% se sigue iniciando el tratamiento con monoterapia (24%). En el paciente no controlado con metformina suelen añadirse inhibidores de la dipeptidil peptidasa4 (iDPP4, 54%) seguido de inhibidores del cotransportador sodio-glucosa tipo2 (iSGLT2, 39%). Los agonistas del receptor del péptido similar al glucagón tipo1 (arGLP1) se asocian principalmente al paciente con DM2 obeso. En el paciente no controlado con metformina+sulfonilurea (SU) se prefiere sustituir la SU a añadir un tercer agente antihiperglucémico al tratamiento (77% vs. 23%). Conclusiones: Todavía persiste en AP un enfoque del tratamiento de la DM2 centrado en la reducción de la HbA1c y en la seguridad de los tratamientos. Por ello, los iDPP4 son fármacos ampliamente utilizados. Los iSGLT2 se reservan habitualmente para pacientes con DM2 y ECV y los arGLP1 para pacientes con DM2 obesos, siendo su uso muy limitado (AU)

Aim: To identify existing controversies in the routine management of patients with T2D and to contrast them with the latest scientific evidence and clinical guidelines, in order to help optimize and homogenize the treatment of patients with T2D in Primary Care (PC) in Spain. Material and methods: 240 family doctors responded to an online questionnaire about the management of 6 patient profiles with T2D of increasing complexity. Results: The main drivers for the antihyperglycemic treatment choice are an HbA1c>10% and the presence of cardiovascular disease (CVD), although in evolved patients, the estimated glomerular filtration rate and the risk of hypoglycemia become more relevant. In newly diagnosed patients with an HbA1c>9%, treatment is still initiated with monotherapy (24%). In patients not controlled with metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4-I, 54%) or sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-I, 39%) are usually added. On the other hand, type1 glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) are mainly associated with obese patients with T2D. In patients not controlled with metformin+sulfonylurea (SU), SU replacement is preferred to adding a third antihyperglycemic agent to background therapy (77% vs. 23%). Conclusions: T2D treatment in PC is still focused on HbA1c reduction and treatment safety. Thus, DPP4-I are widely used. SGLT2-I are usually preferred for patients with T2D and CVD and GLP1-RA for patients with T2D and obesity, although their use in PC is low (AU)