Subthalamic Nucleus: Neuroanatomical Review

Discovered in 1865 by Jules Bernard Luys, the subthalamic nucleus is a set of small nuclei located in the diencephalon, inferior to the thalamus and superior to the substantia nigra, that can be visualized in a posterior coronal section. Histologically, it consists of neurons compactly distributed and filled with a large number of blood vessels and sparse myelinated fibers. This review presents an analysis of this anatomical region, considering what is most recent in the literature. Subthalamic neurons are excitatory and use glutamate as the neurotransmitter. In healthy individuals, these neurons are inhibited by nerve cells located in the side globus pallidus. However, if the fibers that make up the afferent circuit are damaged, the neurons become highly excitable, thus causing motor disturbances that can be classified as hyperkinetic, for example ballism and chorea, or hypokinetic, for example Parkinson disease (PD). The advent of deep brain stimulation has given the subthalamic nucleus great visibility. Studies reveal that the stimulation of this nucleus improves themotor symptoms of PD.

Forebrain projections to brainstem nuclei involved in the control of mandibular movements in rats.

Mandibular movements occur through the triggering of trigeminal motoneurons. Aberrant movements by orofacial muscles are characteristic of orofacial motor disorders, such as nocturnal bruxism (clenching or grinding of the dentition during sleep). Previous studies have suggested that autonomic changes occur during bruxism episodes. Although it is known that emotional responses increase jaw movement, the brain pathways linking forebrain limbic nuclei and the trigeminal motor nucleus remain unclear. Here we show that neurons in the lateral hypothalamic area, in the central nucleus of the amygdala, and in the parasubthalamic nucleus, project to the trigeminal motor nucleus or to reticular regions around the motor nucleus (Regio h) and in the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus. We observed orexin co-expression in neurons projecting from the lateral hypothalamic area to the trigeminal motor nucleus. In the central nucleus of the amygdala, neurons projecting to the trigeminal motor nucleus are innervated by corticotrophin-releasing factor immunoreactive fibers. We also observed that the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus receives dense innervation from orexin and corticotrophin-releasing factor immunoreactive fibers. Therefore, forebrain nuclei related to autonomic control and stress responses might influence the activity of trigeminal motor neurons and consequently play a role in the physiopathology of nocturnal bruxism.

[Subthalamic nucleus targeting and spatial variability]. / Localización bilateral y simetría del núcleo subtalámico.

AIM: The effectiveness of anatomic localization of the subthalamic nucleus (EAL) was assessed and the mapping method is described here. The symmetry of contralateral nuclei (SCN) was analyzed on 11 parkinsonian patients submitted to bilateral subthalamotomy with ablative lesioning. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To assess EAL the percentage so much of first trajectory (p1) as the total of trajectories (pt) that hit the target and the rest of subthalamic nucleus average distance (d) was calculated. The anatomic localization error (epsilon) is determined as a difference between first trajectory coordinates with those of medial determined nucleus point, through electrophysiological data as to the statistical significance of this error. SCN is analyzed by contrasting equality hypothesis at the nucleus maximum height alongside a trajectory, average electrophysiological position center and spatial distribution of all intranuclear recordings found in each hemisphere in all patients. RESULTS: The pi, pt and d obtained values were 86.36%, 86.13% and 1.41 +/- 1.01 mm respectively. The epsilon value was greater in anteroposterior direction of 1.11 +/- 0.83 mm without statistical significance. The average number of recorded trajectories for the first procedure was 6.45 and 6 for the second. The asymmetry of contralateral nucleus was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: An indirect method with CT brain images and a new electrophysiological mapping method with a multiunitary recording for first and second nucleus is safe enough and it yields a high effectiveness in anatomofunctional nucleus localization. The nucleus of a same patient are symmetrical. There is little space variability among patient non related to the differences in the intercommissural distance.