RESUMEN
Background Between the conflicting requirements of clinic organisation, the European Working Time Directive, patient safety, an increasing lack of junior staff, and competitiveness, the development of ideal duty hour models is vital to ensure maximum quality of care within the legal requirements. To achieve this, it is useful to evaluate the actual effects of duty hour models on staff satisfaction. Materials and Methods After the traditional 24-hour duty shift was given up in a surgical maximum care centre in 2007, an 18-hour duty shift was implemented, followed by a 12-hour shift in 2008, to improve handovers and reduce loss of information. The effects on work organisation, quality of life and salary were analysed in an anonymous survey in 2008. The staff survey was repeated in 2014. Results With a response rate of 95% of questionnaires in 2008 and a 93% response rate in 2014, the 12-hour duty model received negative ratings due to its high duty frequency and subsequent social strain. Also the physical strain and chronic tiredness were rated as most severe in the 12-hour rota. The 18-hour duty shift was the model of choice amongst staff. The 24-hour duty model was rated as the best compromise between the requirements of work organisation and staff satisfaction, and therefore this duty model was adapted accordingly in 2015. Conclusion The essential basis of a surgical department is a duty hour model suited to the requirements of work organisation, the Working Time Directive and the needs of the surgical staff. A 12-hour duty model can be ideal for work organisation, but only if augmented with an adequate number of staff members, the implementation of this model is possible without the frequency of 12-hour shifts being too high associated with strain on surgical staff and a perceived deterioration of quality of life. A staff survey should be performed on a regular basis to assess the actual effects of duty hour models and enable further optimisation. The much criticised 24-hour duty model seems to be much better than its reputation, if augmented by additional staff members in the evening hours.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Competencia Clínica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Centros Quirúrgicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Tolerancia al Trabajo Programado , Carga de Trabajo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Alemania , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Seguridad del Paciente/legislación & jurisprudencia , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
This final rule with comment period revises the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) and the Medicare ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system for CY 2017 to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with these systems. In this final rule with comment period, we describe the changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the payment rates for Medicare services paid under the OPPS and those paid under the ASC payment system. In addition, this final rule with comment period updates and refines the requirements for the Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program and the ASC Quality Reporting (ASCQR) Program. Further, in this final rule with comment period, we are making changes to tolerance thresholds for clinical outcomes for solid organ transplant programs; to Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) definitions, outcome measures, and organ transport documentation; and to the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Programs. We also are removing the HCAHPS Pain Management dimension from the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. In addition, we are implementing section 603 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 relating to payment for certain items and services furnished by certain off-campus provider-based departments of a provider. In this document, we also are issuing an interim final rule with comment period to establish the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule payment rates for the nonexcepted items and services billed by a nonexcepted off-campus provider-based department of a hospital in accordance with the provisions of section 603.
Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Atención Ambulatoria/legislación & jurisprudencia , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/economía , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Tabla de Aranceles/economía , Tabla de Aranceles/legislación & jurisprudencia , Medicare/economía , Medicare/legislación & jurisprudencia , Trasplante de Órganos/economía , Trasplante de Órganos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/economía , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros Quirúrgicos/economía , Centros Quirúrgicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Documentación , Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System/economía , Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades/economía , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades/legislación & jurisprudencia , Notificación Obligatoria , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/economía , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Reembolso de Incentivo/economía , Reembolso de Incentivo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados Unidos , Compra Basada en Calidad/economía , Compra Basada en Calidad/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Outpatient surgery is increasingly delivered at freestanding ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), which are thought to deliver quality care at lower costs per episode. The objective of this study was to understand potential facilitators and/or barriers to the introduction of freestanding ASCs in the United States. METHODS: This is an observational study conducted from 2008 to 2010 using a 20% sample of Medicare claims. Potential determinants of ASC dissemination, including population, system, and legal factors, were compared between markets that always had ASCs, never had ASCs, and those that had new ASCs open during the study. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine characteristics of markets associated with the opening of a new facility in a previously naïve market. RESULTS: New ASCs opened in 67 previously naïve markets between 2008 and 2010. ASCs were more likely to open in hospital service areas that were urban (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 4.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51-10.96), had higher per capita income (adjusted OR, 3.83; 95% CI, 1.43-10.45), and had less competition for outpatient surgery (adjusted OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.02-4.45). Legal considerations and latent need, as measured by case volumes of hospital-based outpatient surgery in 2007, were not associated with the opening of a new ASC. CONCLUSIONS: Freestanding ASCs opened in advantageous socioeconomic environments with the least amount of competition. Because of their associated efficiency advantages, policy makers might consider strategies to promote ASC diffusion in disadvantaged markets to potentially improve access and reduce costs.
Asunto(s)
Sector de Atención de Salud , Centros Quirúrgicos , Difusión de Innovaciones , Femenino , Sector de Atención de Salud/economía , Sector de Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Centros Quirúrgicos/economía , Centros Quirúrgicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros Quirúrgicos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
This final rule with comment period revises the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) and the Medicare ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system for CY 2015 to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with these systems. In this final rule with comment period, we describe the changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the payment rates for Medicare services paid under the OPPS and those paid under the ASC payment system. In addition, this final rule with comment period updates and refines the requirements for the Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program and the ASC Quality Reporting (ASCQR) Program. In this document, we also are making changes to the data sources permitted for expansion requests for physician-owned hospitals under the physician self-referral regulations; changes to the underlying authority for the requirement of an admission order for all hospital inpatient admissions and changes to require physician certification for hospital inpatient admissions only for long-stay cases and outlier cases; and changes to establish a formal process, including a three-level appeals process, to recoup overpayments that result from the submission of erroneous payment data by Medicare Advantage (MA) organizations and Part D sponsors in the limited circumstances in which the organization or sponsor fails to correct these data.
Asunto(s)
Medicare Part C/economía , Medicare/economía , Auto Remisión del Médico/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Centros Quirúrgicos/economía , Certificación/economía , Certificación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Hospitales con Fines de Lucro/economía , Hospitales con Fines de Lucro/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Notificación Obligatoria , Medicare/legislación & jurisprudencia , Medicare Part C/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros Quirúrgicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Programas Nacionales de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Canadá , Historia del Siglo XXI , Hospitales con Fines de Lucro/economía , Hospitales con Fines de Lucro/legislación & jurisprudencia , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Centros Quirúrgicos/economía , Centros Quirúrgicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Listas de EsperaRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: Liposuction is one of the most common cosmetic surgery procedures in the United States. Tumescent liposuction, in which crystalloid fluids, lidocaine, and epinephrine are infused subcutaneously before cannula-assisted aspiration of fat, can be performed without intravenous or general anesthesia, often at outpatient facilities. However, some of these facilities are not subject to state or federal regulation and may not adhere to appropriate infection control practices. OBJECTIVE: To describe an outbreak of severe group A Streptococcus (GAS) infections among persons undergoing tumescent liposuction at 2 outpatient cosmetic surgery facilities not subject to state or federal regulation. DESIGN: Outbreak investigation (including cohort analysis of at-risk patients), interviews using a standardized questionnaire, medical record review, facility assessment, and laboratory analysis of GAS isolates. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing liposuction at 2 outpatient facilities, one in Maryland and the other in Pennsylvania, between July 1 and September 14, 2012. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Confirmed invasive GAS infections (isolation of GAS from a normally sterile site or wound of a patient with necrotizing fasciitis or streptococcal toxic shock syndrome), suspected GAS infections (inflamed surgical site and either purulent discharge or fever and chills in a patient with no alternative diagnosis), postsurgical symptoms and patient-reported experiences related to his or her procedure, and emm types, T-antigen types, and antimicrobial susceptibility of GAS isolates. RESULTS: We identified 4 confirmed cases and 9 suspected cases, including 1 death (overall attack rate, 20% [13 of 66]). One instance of likely secondary GAS transmission to a household member occurred. All confirmed case patients had necrotizing fasciitis and had undergone surgical debridement. Procedures linked to illness were performed by a single surgical team that traveled between the 2 locations; 2 team members (1 of whom reported recent cellulitis) were colonized with a GAS strain that was indistinguishable by laboratory analysis of the isolates from the case patients. Facility assessments and patient reports indicated substandard infection control, including errors in equipment sterilization and infection prevention training. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This outbreak of severe GAS infections was likely caused by transmission from colonized health care workers to patients during liposuction procedures. Additional oversight of outpatient cosmetic surgery facilities is needed to assure that they maintain appropriate infection control practices and other patient protections.
Asunto(s)
Lipectomía/efectos adversos , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/etiología , Streptococcus pyogenes/patogenicidad , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Maryland/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pennsylvania/epidemiología , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/epidemiología , Streptococcus pyogenes/aislamiento & purificación , Centros Quirúrgicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros Quirúrgicos/normas , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Organizaciones Responsables por la Atención/legislación & jurisprudencia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Centros Quirúrgicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Organizaciones Responsables por la Atención/economía , Humanos , Medicare/economía , Medicare/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros Quirúrgicos/economía , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/legislación & jurisprudencia , Atención a la Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Oftalmología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros Quirúrgicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Enfermedades de la Retina/cirugía , EspecializaciónAsunto(s)
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./economía , Administración Financiera de Hospitales , Implementación de Plan de Salud/economía , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros Quirúrgicos/economía , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./legislación & jurisprudencia , Administración Financiera de Hospitales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Financiación Gubernamental , Implementación de Plan de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/legislación & jurisprudencia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/tendencias , Centros Quirúrgicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
: This final rule with comment period revises the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) and the Medicare ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system for CY 2014 to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with these systems. In this final rule with comment period, we describe the changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the payment rates for Medicare services paid under the OPPS and those paid under the ASC payment system. In addition, this final rule with comment period updates and refines the requirements for the Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program, the ASC Quality Reporting (ASCQR) Program, and the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. In the final rules in this document, we are finalizing changes to the conditions for coverage (CfCs) for organ procurement organizations (OPOs); revisions to the Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) regulations; changes to the Medicare fee-for-service Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program; and changes relating to provider reimbursement determinations and appeals.
Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud/economía , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economía , Medicare/economía , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/economía , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/economía , Reembolso de Incentivo/economía , Centros Quirúrgicos/economía , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/economía , Compra Basada en Calidad/economía , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Medicare/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Reembolso de Incentivo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros Quirúrgicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados Unidos , Compra Basada en Calidad/legislación & jurisprudenciaAsunto(s)
Directivas Anticipadas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./legislación & jurisprudencia , Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/normas , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./normas , Regulación Gubernamental , Guías como Asunto , Personal de Salud/educación , Humanos , Capacitación en Servicio/normas , Prioridad del Paciente , Gobierno Estatal , Centros Quirúrgicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros Quirúrgicos/normas , Estados Unidos , Recursos HumanosAsunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Notificación de Enfermedades/legislación & jurisprudencia , Brotes de Enfermedades/legislación & jurisprudencia , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Hepatitis C/transmisión , Centros Quirúrgicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Análisis por Conglomerados , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/legislación & jurisprudencia , Embalaje de Medicamentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Equipo Reutilizado/legislación & jurisprudencia , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Profesional a Paciente , Licencia Hospitalaria , Nevada , Enfermeras Anestesistas , Propofol , Jeringas/virologíaRESUMEN
This final rule with comment period revises the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) and the Medicare ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system for CY 2013 to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with these systems. In this final rule with comment period, we describe the changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the payment rates for Medicare services paid under the OPPS and those paid under the ASC payment system. In addition, this final rule with comment period updates and refines the requirements for the Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program, the ASC Quality Reporting (ASCQR) Program, and the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) Quality Reporting Program. We are continuing the electronic reporting pilot for the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program, and revising the various regulations governing Quality Improvement Organizations (QIOs), including the secure transmittal of electronic medical information, beneficiary complaint resolution and notification processes, and technical changes. The technical changes to the QIO regulations reflect CMS' commitment to the general principles of the President's Executive Order on Regulatory Reform, Executive Order 13563 (January 18, 2011).
Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Medicare/economía , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/economía , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/economía , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros de Rehabilitación/economía , Centros Quirúrgicos/economía , Atención Ambulatoria/legislación & jurisprudencia , Current Procedural Terminology , Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System , Humanos , Medicare/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/legislación & jurisprudencia , Proyectos Piloto , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros de Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Escalas de Valor Relativo , Centros Quirúrgicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
This major final rule with comment period addresses changes to the physician fee schedule, payments for Part B drugs, and other Medicare Part B payment policies to ensure that our payment systems are updated to reflect changes in medical practice and the relative value of services. It also implements provisions of the Affordable Care Act by establishing a face-to-face encounter as a condition of payment for certain durable medical equipment (DME) items. In addition, it implements statutory changes regarding the termination of non-random prepayment review. This final rule with comment period also includes a discussion in the Supplementary Information regarding various programs . (See the Table of Contents for a listing of the specific issues addressed in this final rule with comment period.)
Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Equipo Médico Durable/economía , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Medicare Part B/economía , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/economía , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/economía , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros de Rehabilitación/economía , Centros Quirúrgicos/economía , Atención Ambulatoria/legislación & jurisprudencia , Current Procedural Terminology , Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System , Humanos , Medicare Part B/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/legislación & jurisprudencia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Proyectos Piloto , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros de Rehabilitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Escalas de Valor Relativo , Centros Quirúrgicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
We are revising the Medicare hospital inpatient prospective payment systems (IPPS) for operating and capital-related costs of acute care hospitals to implement changes arising from our continuing experience with these systems. Some of the changes implement certain statutory provisions contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively known as the Affordable Care Act) and other legislation. These changes will be applicable to discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2012, unless otherwise specified in this final rule. We also are updating the rate-of-increase limits for certain hospitals excluded from the IPPS that are paid on a reasonable cost basis subject to these limits. The updated rate-of-increase limits will be effective for cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2012. We are updating the payment policies and the annual payment rates for the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for inpatient hospital services provided by long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) and implementing certain statutory changes made by the Affordable Care Act. Generally, these changes will be applicable to discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2012, unless otherwise specified in this final rule. In addition, we are implementing changes relating to determining a hospital's full-time equivalent (FTE) resident cap for the purpose of graduate medical education (GME) and indirect medical education (IME) payments. We are establishing new requirements or revised requirements for quality reporting by specific providers (acute care hospitals, PPS-exempt cancer hospitals, LTCHs, and inpatient psychiatric facilities (IPFs)) that are participating in Medicare. We also are establishing new administrative, data completeness, and extraordinary circumstance waivers or extension requests requirements, as well as a reconsideration process, for quality reporting by ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) that are participating in Medicare. We are establishing requirements for the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program and the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program.
Asunto(s)
Economía Hospitalaria/legislación & jurisprudencia , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/economía , Legislación Hospitalaria/economía , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/economía , Medicare/economía , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/economía , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/economía , Centros Quirúrgicos/economía , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Medicare/legislación & jurisprudencia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros Quirúrgicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
This final rule with comment period addresses changes to the physician fee schedule and other Medicare Part B payment policies to ensure that our payment systems are updated to reflect changes in medical practice and the relative value of services. It also addresses, implements or discusses certain statutory provisions including provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively known as the Affordable Care Act) and the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (MIPPA) of 2008. In addition, this final rule with comment period discusses payments for Part B drugs; Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule: Signature on Requisition; Physician Quality Reporting System; the Electronic Prescribing (eRx) Incentive Program; the Physician Resource-Use Feedback Program and the value modifier; productivity adjustment for ambulatory surgical center payment system and the ambulance, clinical laboratory, and durable medical equipment prosthetics orthotics and supplies (DMEPOS) fee schedules; and other Part B related issues.