Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 471
1.
J Reprod Immunol ; 163: 104247, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669789

This comprehensive review examines the multifaceted landscape of surrogacy, a revolutionary treatment for infertility. The study examines historical origins, shifting trends, medical considerations, psychological implications, legal complexities, international variations, and ethical dilemmas surrounding surrogacy. With the advent of assisted reproductive technology, gestational surrogacy allows intended parents a genetic connection to their child. Medical facets encompass indications for gestational surrogacy, drawing attention to maternal health risks and infertility factors. Evidence indicates that medical outcomes are comparable to conventional pregnancies, suggesting a viable reproductive solution for intended parents. Due to the complex nature of surrogacy psychological and emotional vulnerability is inevitable; yet studies underscore positive psychological well-being and satisfaction among gestational carriers (GCs), intended parents (IPs) and children. Surrogacy also has many religious dimensions, as each religion has its own perspective on the distinctive process of creating life and its outcomes, such as, the determination of the child's mother according to their beliefs. Legal considerations emerge as a fundamental aspect, with differing regulations globally. The review emphasizes the significance of comprehensive agreements to safeguard the rights and responsibilities of surrogates and IPs. The unique surrogacy laws in Israel serve as a noteworthy example, reflecting a progressive approach that provides a promising template to establish crucial international guidelines on surrogacy. The absence of international consensus necessitates attention from the global community to address key concerns, including the well-being of GCs, legal recognition for IPs, and the child's best interests, with the goal of establishing a universal standard of care in the field.


Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Surrogate Mothers , Humans , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Pregnancy , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/ethics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Infertility/therapy , Parents/psychology , Israel
2.
Ann Emerg Med ; 83(6): 585-597, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38639673

The emergency department clinical environment is unique, and guidelines for promoting supportive and equitable workplace cultures ensure success and longevity for pregnant persons and parents in emergency medicine. There is paucity, variability, and dissatisfaction with current parental (historically referred to as maternity and paternity) leave policies. This paper describes the development of consensus-derived recommendations to serve as a framework for emergency departments across the country for incorporating family-friendly policies. Policies that foster a family-inclusive workplace by allowing for professional advancement without sacrificing personal values regardless of sex, gender, and gender identity are critical for emergency medicine recruitment and retention.


Emergency Medicine , Parental Leave , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adoption/legislation & jurisprudence , Lactation , Consensus , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Emergency Service, Hospital , Physicians , Organizational Policy , Male
3.
Cien Saude Colet ; 29(4): e18662023, 2024 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38655961

Considered until recently unfit to rear children, non-heterosexual people have been excluded from forming families in most countries. Many, worldwide, demand access to family formation, claiming the same aptitudes as heterosexual people for raising children. However, when non-heterosexual singles and couples want to become parents in Spain, they must consider transnational contexts, resorting to inter-country adoption or surrogacy abroad, processes that contribute to delay their family formation. They must consider not only Spanish sociocultural conditions, but other countries' legal restrictions regarding parents' gender, social status, and sexual identity. These families experience great difficulty in gaining access to reproductive health services. Based on multi-site ethnographic fieldwork, this text addresses how, despite legislative changes allowing homoparental family formation in Spain, these parents must overcome complex bureaucratic processes when they decide to have children, while facing homophobic attitudes and policies in their quests to become parents.


Parents , Spain , Humans , Female , Male , Parents/psychology , Adoption , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Services Accessibility , Parenting/psychology , Homosexuality
4.
Cien Saude Colet ; 29(4): e19122023, 2024 Apr.
Article Es, En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38655962

Comprehensive access to medically assisted reproduction procedures and techniques in Argentina has been assured by National Law No. 26,862 since 2013. This Law does not include surrogacy procedures, and the lack of specific regulation shifts practices to a paralegal setting. In this context, planned parenthood by male couples through surrogacy is performed through actions that convey demands for access rights and active State policies. For these couples, the argument is that surrogacy is the only option to have a child with a genetic bond with at least one of the two parents and recognize both filiatory bonds. This work results from field work in progress with parents from the Province of Buenos Aires running this practice in Argentina. Based on in-depth interviews, we attempted to rebuild personal experiences and analyze the meanings that the narratives construct regarding their parenting, the biological connections in establishing or defining family relationships, and the importance of genetics in constructing and maintaining affiliations.


En Argentina desde 2013 existe la Ley Nacional 26.862 de acceso integral a los procedimientos y técnicas de reproducción médicamente asistida (TRA). Esta no incluye los procedimientos de gestación por sustitución (GS) y la ausencia de regulación específica mueve las prácticas a un escenario de paralegalidad. En este contexto, las paternidades planificadas por parejas de varones a través de GS se llevan adelante mediante acciones que vehiculizan demandas de derechos de acceso y políticas activas del Estado. Para estas parejas el argumento es que la GS representa la única opción para tener un/a hijo/a con vínculo genético con al menos uno de los dos padres y poder reconocer ambos vínculos filiatorios. El presente trabajo es el resultado de un trabajo de campo en proceso con padres de Buenos Aires que están llevando adelante esta práctica en Argentina. A partir de entrevistas en profundidad intentamos reconstruir las experiencias personales y analizar los sentidos que construyen las narrativas respecto de sus parentalidades, las conexiones biológicas en la creación o definición de los lazos familiares y analizamos la importancia de la genética en la construcción y mantenimiento de vínculos filiatorios.


Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Surrogate Mothers , Argentina , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Surrogate Mothers/psychology , Humans , Male , Female , Parenting/psychology , Parents/psychology , Interviews as Topic , Decision Making , Choice Behavior , Family Relations/psychology , Adult
5.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 48(5): 103764, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38428344

The practice of surrogacy is frequently the subject of media, scientific, social, regulatory and policy attention. Although it is, for many, an accepted form of assisted reproduction for those who would otherwise not be able to have children, surrogacy often generates strong feeling, particularly where there is any possibility of exploitation. Therefore, there is disagreement about how it should be regulated. In some countries, surrogacy is prohibited in any form, although this does not stop people using it. In others, it is unregulated but still practised. In some nations it is regulated in either a 'commercial' or an 'altruistic' model. This review article considers the possible regulatory future of surrogacy, initially from a UK perspective considering a recent review of the legal framework in a country where surrogacy works well (although some cross borders to access it), and then through an assessment of global trends and other national perspectives. It concludes that the international regulation of surrogacy, although potentially desirable, is unlikely. This being the case, it would be preferable for individual nations to regulate surrogacy so it can be undertaken in ways that are safe, ethical and protective of the best interests of children, surrogates, intended parents and families.


Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Surrogate Mothers , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , United Kingdom
7.
J Law Med ; 30(1): 166-178, 2023 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37271957

This article examines the United Kingdom Supreme Court decision in Whittington Hospital NHS Trust v XX [2020] UKSC 14. The case centred on whether damages could be awarded for the cost of a commercial surrogacy arrangement in California, following clinical negligence by the hospital that left the plaintiff unable to carry her own children. After examination of this case, the article outlines and compares the United Kingdom and Australian surrogacy laws. It then discusses how a similar case would be decided in Australia and argues that the result would be the same in some Australian States. It also discusses the concept of reproductive autonomy and the importance of this concept when considering cases involving the loss of fertility.


Malpractice , Surrogate Mothers , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Infertility , Personal Autonomy , Reproductive Rights , United Kingdom , Australia
8.
Rev. derecho genoma hum ; (58): 85-132, Ene.-jun. 2023.
Article Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-231271

La gestación por sustitución es una vía para poder tener descendencia que, en nuestro país no es aceptada y ello nos ha llevado a un alto turismo reproductivo cuyas consecuencias derivan en una inseguridad jurídica inaceptable en un Estado Social y Democrático como el nuestro; inseguridad que alcanza incluso al ordenamiento penal. Por ello, se hace necesario una aproximación a este fenómeno, sus consecuencias y posibles soluciones. (AU)


Surrogacy is a way to have offspring that is not accepted in our country and this has led to a high level of reproductive tourism whose consequences lead to unacceptable legal uncertainty in a Social and Democratic State like ours; insecurity that even reaches the penal system. Therefore, an approach to this phenomenon, its consequences and possible solutions is necessary. (AU)


Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Criminal Law , Reproductive Techniques/ethics , Reproductive Techniques/legislation & jurisprudence , Civil Rights
9.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 225(3): 264-269, 2021 09.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33839094

Gestational surrogacy in the United States has quadrupled since 1999, but to date, only a few states explicitly permit compensated gestational surrogacy. Current legal prohibitions are often influenced by outdated and stereotyped understandings of surrogacy. It is increasingly important to understand the current literature about the medical and mental health impacts of surrogacy and how state legislatures have addressed compensated gestational surrogacy in recent years. Based on this review, we found no evidence of substantial adverse medical or psychological outcomes among women who are gestational carriers or among the children they give birth to. The literature suggests that gestational surrogacy is a safe and increasingly popular option for families as long as rigorous screening and medical, psychological, and social supports are equitably provided. As states move to responsibly legalize and regulate gestational surrogacy, there is a continued need for further longitudinal studies on the health and psychological outcomes of gestational surrogacy.


Pregnancy Outcome , Surrogate Mothers , Female , Humans , Parent-Child Relations , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Multiple , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/psychology , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Surrogate Mothers/psychology
10.
Med Leg J ; 89(2): 128-132, 2021 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33715522

Transnational commercial surrogacy is a form of medical tourism undertaken by intended parents in an attempt to seek surrogates in other countries. Most intended parents are from developed countries and seek their surrogates from developing countries, predominantly from South and Southeast Asia. This arrangement led to the establishment of surrogacy businesses in South and Southeast Asia, in countries such as India and Thailand. Subsequently, the business was banned in these countries, which led to a trend of moving it to neighbouring countries where there were no regulations or restrictions. This paper maps the movement of the industry and calls for attention to re-consider or re-frame commercial surrogacy in an international framework.


Commerce/economics , Commerce/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Asia, Southeastern , Asia, Western , Commerce/trends , Female , Humans , Pregnancy
11.
Fertil Steril ; 115(2): 268-273, 2021 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33579520

This article provides a general overview of the practical management of legal issues in cross-border gestational surrogacy. Particular problems arising from the global pandemic as well as a number of proposed solutions are presented and analyzed. A section addressing the involvement of the fertility center in such arrangements is included. Additionally, the article discusses how parentage and citizenship are handled abroad, with a focus on the United Kingdom.


Emigration and Immigration/legislation & jurisprudence , Internationality , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Emigration and Immigration/trends , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends , United Kingdom/epidemiology
12.
Fertil Steril ; 115(2): 261-262, 2021 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33388138

Legal issues affect reproductive medical practice throughout the entire world. The breadth and depth of this interrelationship extend far beyond the scope of one series of articles in Views and Reviews. Given this limitation, we have chosen to present five topics, all different, but illustrative of key concepts that influence our practice of reproductive medicine. Our hope is that this "medical-legal sampler" will both inform and provoke thoughtful consideration of the ways we can best and most responsibly practice and serve our patients.


Medical Tourism/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , Medical Tourism/trends , Physicians/legislation & jurisprudence , Pregnancy , Professional Autonomy , Reproductive Medicine/trends , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends
13.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 57(1)2021 Jan 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33429930

Background and objectives: To explore the ethical and legal complexities arising from the controversial issue of surrogacy, particularly in terms of how they affect fundamental rights of children and parents. Surrogacy is a form of medically-assisted procreation (MAP) in which a woman "lends" her uterus to carry out a pregnancy on behalf of a third party. There are pathological conditions, such as uterine agenesis or hysterectomy outcomes, that may prevent prospective mothers from becoming pregnant or carry a pregnancy to term; such patients may consider finding a surrogate mother. Many issues relating to surrogacy remain unresolved, with significant disagreements and controversy within the scientific community and public opinion. There are several factors called into play and multiple parties and stakeholders whose objectives and interests need to somehow be reconciled. First and foremost, the authors contend, it is essential to prioritize and uphold the rights of children born through surrogacy and heterologous MAP. Materials and methods: To draw a parallel between Italy and the rest of the world, the legislation in force in twelve European countries was analyzed, eleven of which are part of the European Union (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Greece, Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Lithuania, Czech Republic and Portugal) and three non-members of the same (United Kingdom, Ukraine and Russia), as well as that of twelve non-European countries considered exemplary (United States, Canada, Australia, India, China, Thailand, Israel, Nigeria and South Africa); in particular, legislative sources and legal databases were drawn upon, in order to draw a comparison with the Italian legislation currently in force and map out the evolution of the Italian case law on the basis of the judgments issued by Italian courts, including the Constitutional and Supreme Courts and the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR); search engines such as PubMed and Google Scholar were also used, by entering the keywords "surrogacy" and "surrogate motherhood", to find scientific articles concerning assisted reproduction techniques with a close focus on surrogacy. Results: SM is a prohibited and sanctioned practice in Italy; on the other hand, it is allowed in other countries of the world, which leads Italian couples, or couples from other countries where it is banned, to often contact foreign centers in order to undertake a MAP pathway which includes surrogacy; in addition, challenges may arise from the legal status of children born through surrogacy abroad: to date, in most countries, there is no specific legislation aimed at regulating their legal registration and parental status. Conclusion: With reference to the Italian context, despite the scientific and legal evolution on the subject, a legislative intervention aimed at filling the regulatory gaps in terms of heterologous MAP and surrogacy has not yet come to fruition. Considering the possibility of "fertility tourism", i.e., traveling to countries where the practice is legal, as indeed already happens in a relatively significant number of cases, the current legislation, although integrated by the legal interpretation, does not appear to be effective in avoiding the phenomenon of procreative tourism. Moreover, to overcome some contradictions currently present between law 40 and law 194, it would be appropriate to outline an organic and exhaustive framework of rules, which should take into account the multiplicity of interests at stake, in keeping with a fair and sustainable balance when regulating such practices.


Public Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Altruism , Australia , Child , Child Welfare/ethics , Child Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Commerce , Europe , Female , Humans , Israel , Italy , Japan , Medical Tourism/ethics , Medical Tourism/legislation & jurisprudence , Pregnancy , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/ethics , Russia , Social Problems , Thailand , Ukraine , United States
14.
Arch Dis Child ; 106(2): 186-188, 2021 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31937569

Surrogate pregnancies are becoming more common, but the law governing who can give consent following surrogate births is complex. Parental responsibility (PR) may be held by a variety of individuals, depending on the specific circumstances.We conducted a survey of paediatric medical staff within Health Education South West to establish knowledge regarding consent for a baby before a parental or adoption order is obtained. Our results showed that 19% of the 47 respondents answered all scenarios correctly. 43% of respondents knew that the surrogate mother had PR in all scenarios; however, 13% incorrectly assumed that either intended parent always had PR. Knowledge of other individuals who could provide consent in the scenarios was variable.Our survey revealed poor understanding regarding medicolegal aspects of consent in these complex situations, emphasising the need for more specific published guidance for primary and secondary healthcare professionals encountering these babies in the early postnatal period.


Health Personnel , Informed Consent , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pediatrics , Pregnancy , State Medicine , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom
15.
Med Law Rev ; 29(1): 172-184, 2021 Aug 09.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33221917

This comment piece explores the decision in Whittington Hospital NHS Trust v XX [2020] UKSC 14. It argues that despite notable shifts in public policy in respect of the acceptability of surrogacy as a means of family formation in the past twenty years, the Supreme Court has taken a step too far in deciding that foreign commercial surrogacy is as widely socially accepted. This impacts on the reasonableness of any claim for damages in negligence for the costs of commercial surrogacy. It is posited that the issue of whether damages for foreign commercial surrogacy are reasonable or not will be the key battleground in future negligence cases of this type.


Commerce/legislation & jurisprudence , Compensation and Redress/legislation & jurisprudence , Liability, Legal/economics , Malpractice/economics , Public Policy , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , Infertility/chemically induced , Pregnancy , State Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , United Kingdom
16.
Rev. bioét. derecho ; (53): 159-180, 2021. graf
Article Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-228092

La microeconomía permite identificar aspectos clave en las decisiones de los agentes económicos, sin embargo, es insuficiente por cuanto las decisiones no sólo se limitan a lo pactado entre las partes sino también se ven afectadas por políticas de gobierno y el desempeño de la industria. Por otro lado, el análisis de la macroeconomía destaca la existencia de políticas que inciden en el desarrollo del mercado tales como: controles de precios, nivel de institucionalidad, barreras internacionales y oportunidades económicas. El acuerdo de maternidad subrogada es un medio que permite la mutua satisfacción de las partes: el aspecto reproductivo / filial de los padres y el aspecto económico de la madre subrogada. Los controles de precios y barreras internacionales afectan a las madres gestantes en múltiples formas, además los efectos de estos controles varían en cada país. El Perú es un destino potencial para el turismo reproductivo dado los bajos costos de sus servicios médicos y los altos estándares de calidad de estos, así como la jurisprudencia uniforme que viabiliza los convenios de maternidad subrogada, siendo el vacío legal un inconveniente para la realización de este tipo de actos. De legalizarse los acuerdos de maternidad subrogada, el precio de la contraprestación dependerá del estado de necesidad de la mujer y su costo de oportunidad. Una regulación permisiva no siempre asegurará un justo intercambio de recursos si no está respaldada por una adecuada institucionalidad que incentive la reproducción asistida como un derecho de la persona (AU)


Microeconomics allows the identification of key aspects in the decisions of economic agents; however, it is insufficient because the decisions are not only limited to the agreement between parties but also, they are affected by government policies and industry performance. On the other hand, the macroeconomic analysis emphasizes the existence of policies that influence market development such as: price controls, level of institutionality, international barriers and economic opportunities. The surrogacy agreement is a mean that allows the mutual satisfaction of the parties: the reproductive/filial aspect of the intended parents and the economic aspect of the surrogate mother. Price controls and international barriers affect pregnant mothers in multiple ways, and the effects of these controls vary among countries. Peru is a potential destination for reproductive tourism given the low costs of their medical services and high-quality standards, as well as the uniform jurisprudence that makes surrogacy agreements viable. Nonetheless, the legal gap is an inconvenience for the realization of this type of act. If surrogacy agreements are legalized, the compensation price will depend on the woman's state of need and her opportunity cost. A permissive regulation will not always guarantee a fair exchange of resources if it is not supported by an adequate institutional framework that encourages assisted reproduction as a right of the person (AU)


La microeconomia permet identificar aspectes clau en les decisions dels agents econòmics, no obstant això, és insuficient puix que les decisions no només es limiten als pactes entre les parts sinó també es veuen afectades per polítiques de govern i l'acompliment de la indústria. D'altra banda, l'anàlisi de la macroeconomia destaca l'existència de polítiques que incideixen en el desenvolupament del mercat tals com: controls de preus, nivell d'institucionalitat, barreres internacionals i oportunitats econòmiques. L'acord de maternitat subrogada és un mitjà que permet la mútua satisfacció de les parts: l'aspecte reproductiu / filial dels pares i l'aspecte econòmic de la mare subrogada. Els controls de preus i barreres internacionals afecten les mares gestants en múltiples formes, a més els efectes d'aquests controls varien en cada país. El Perú és una destinació potencial per al turisme reproductiu donat els baixos costos dels seus serveis mèdics i els alts estàndards de qualitat d'aquests, així com la jurisprudència uniforme que viabilitza els convenis de maternitat subrogada, sent el buit legal un inconvenient per a la realització d'aquest tipus d'actes. De legalitzar-se els acords de maternitat subrogada, el preu de la contraprestació dependrà de l'estat de necessitat de la dona i el seu cost d'oportunitat. Una regulació permissiva no sempre assegurarà un just intercanvi de recursos si no està recolzada per una adequada institucionalitat que incentivi la reproducció assistida com un dret de la persona (AU)


Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/ethics , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Bioethical Issues
17.
New Bioeth ; 26(4): 328-350, 2020 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33196403

United States law recognizes adult reproductive liberty and many states view surrogacy services through that lens. During the COVID-19 pandemic in March, 2020, New York State enacted the Child-Parent Surrogacy Act (CPSA) into law, after feminists and their allies had caused its defeat in 2019. Just before approval of the CPSA, a group of legislators introduced the Alternative Surrogacy Bill (ASB). This article is a case study that examines how the CPSA and not the ASB became law, examining surrogate rights, the best interests of the child, and the ethical issues related to adult donor-conceived and surrogacy born children's rights to information about their ancestry.


Commerce/legislation & jurisprudence , Human Rights , Legislation, Medical/ethics , Reproductive Techniques/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Control, Formal , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Access to Information , Adult , COVID-19 , Child , Child Welfare , Commerce/ethics , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Dissent and Disputes , Family , Female , Humans , Industry/ethics , Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Mothers , New York/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Reproductive Techniques/economics , Reproductive Techniques/ethics , Women's Rights
18.
Med Health Care Philos ; 23(4): 621-630, 2020 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32929622

It is unclear what proper remuneration for surrogacy is, since countries disagree and both commercial and altruistic surrogacy have ethical drawbacks. In the presence of cross-border surrogacy, these ethical drawbacks are exacerbated. In this article, we explore what would be ethical remuneration for surrogacy, and suggest regulations for how to ensure this in the international context. A normative ethical analysis of commercial surrogacy is conducted. Various arguments against commercial surrogacy are explored, such as exploitation and commodification of surrogates, reproductive capacities, and the child. We argue that, although commodification and exploitation can occur, these problems are not specific to surrogacy but should be understood in the broader context of an unequal world. Moreover, at least some of these arguments are based on symbolic rhetoric or they lack knowledge of real-world experiences. In line with this critique we argue that commercial surrogacy can be justified, but how and under what circumstances depends on the context. Surrogates should be paid a sufficient amount and regulations should be in order. In this article, the Netherlands and India (where commercial surrogacy was legal until 2015) are case examples of contexts that differ in many respects. In both contexts, surrogacy can be seen as a legitimate form of work, which requires the same wage and safety standards as other forms of labor. Payments for surrogacy need to be high enough to avoid exploitation by underpayment, which can be established by the mechanisms of either minimum wage (in high income countries such as the Netherlands), or Fair-Trade guidelines (in lower-middle income countries such as India). An international treaty governing commercial surrogacy should be in place, and local professional bodies to protect the interests of surrogates should be required. Commercial surrogacy should be permitted across the globe, which would also reduce the need for intended parents to seek surrogacy services abroad.


Commodification , Remuneration , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Ethical Analysis , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , India , Netherlands , Philosophy, Medical , Social Problems/economics , Social Problems/psychology , Socioeconomic Factors
19.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 49(9): 101902, 2020 Nov.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32889113

INTRODUCTION: France is known for its conservative and unique position in assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). At the eve of the future revision of French Bioethics laws, we decided to conduct a national survey to examine the opinions of French specialists in ARTs about social issues. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive study conducted in May 2017 in a university teaching hospital using an anonymous online questionnaire on current issues in ARTs. The questionnaire was sent by email to 650 French ARTs specialists, both clinicians and embryologists. RESULTS: After 3 reminders, 408 responses were collected resulting in a participation rate of 62.7% (408/650). Concerning pre-implantation genetic testing, 80% of the physicians were in favor of expanding the indications, which in France are presently limited to incurable genetic diseases. Authorizing elective Fertility Preservation was supported by 93.4% of the specialists, but without social coverage for 86.3% of them. Concerning gamete donation, 77.4% of the French ARTs specialists were in favor of giving a financial compensation to donors, 92% promoted preserving their anonymity and 80.9% were against a directed donation. ARTs for single heterosexual women were supported by 63.4% of the French specialists and by 72.5% for lesbian couples. The legalization of surrogacy was requested by 55.2%. DISCUSSION: Pending the revision of the French Bioethics laws, this survey provides an overview of the opinion of the specialists in ARTs on expanding ARTs for various social indications.Because of the evolution of social values, a more liberal and inclusive ART program is desired by the majority of ART specialists in France.


Attitude of Health Personnel , Bioethical Issues/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Sociological Factors , Specialization , Surveys and Questionnaires , Bioethics , Female , Fertility Preservation/legislation & jurisprudence , France , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends , Sexual and Gender Minorities/legislation & jurisprudence , Single Person/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Change , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Tissue Donors/legislation & jurisprudence
20.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 117(33): 19792-19798, 2020 08 18.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32727903

We study popular attitudes in Germany, Spain, the Philippines, and the United States toward three controversial markets-prostitution, surrogacy, and global kidney exchange (GKE). Of those markets, only prostitution is banned in the United States and the Philippines, and only prostitution is allowed in Germany and Spain. Unlike prostitution, majorities support legalization of surrogacy and GKE in all four countries. So, there is not a simple relation between public support for markets, or bans, and their legal and regulatory status. Because both markets and bans on markets require social support to work well, this sheds light on the prospects for effective regulation of controversial markets.


Sex Work/legislation & jurisprudence , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Tissue and Organ Procurement/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Germany , Humans , Philippines , Spain , Tissue and Organ Procurement/economics , United States
...