Shorter operation time and improved surgical outcomes in laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy compared with open donor right hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy is a complex procedure, and the safety and feasibility of this operation remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and learning curve of this operation performed by a single surgeon. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the initial 100 donors who underwent pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy or open donor right hepatectomy by a single surgeon from December 2012 to May 2019. Endpoints analyzed included intraoperative results, postoperative complications, and learning curve, which was evaluated using the cumulative sum method based on the operation time. We divided the pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy group into initial and recent groups based on the time point of overcoming the learning curve. RESULTS: The operative time was significantly shorter in the recent pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy group (n = 57; 181.0 ± 35.7 min) than in the open donor right hepatectomy (n = 50; 203.0 ± 37.3 min) and initial pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (n = 43; 282.2 ± 59.2 min) groups (P < .001). Moreover, the length of hospital stay in the recent pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy group was significantly reduced compared to that in the open donor right hepatectomy group (7.7 ± 1.2 vs 5.8 ± 1.4; P < .001). The complication rate was reduced from 10% in the open donor right hepatectomy group and 8% in the initial pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy group to 2% in the recent pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy group. CONCLUSION: As technology advances, the surgical outcomes of pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy are comparable and the operation time of pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy is superior to those of open donor hepatectomy.

The Impact of Preoperative Oral Health on Buccal Mucosa Graft Histology.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have elucidated the unique macroscopic and histological properties of buccal mucosa that make it a viable and durable graft for urethral augmentation. However, no prior literature has directly investigated the impact of preoperative oral health on these features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed all consenting patients who underwent buccal mucosal graft (BMG) urethroplasty at our institution from 2018 to 2020. Validated oral health surveys, the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and the Kayser-Jones Brief Oral Health Status Examination (BOHSE) were completed preoperatively. A staff pathologist analyzed BMG histology and quantified oral mucositis using a modified Oral Mucosa Rating Scale. RESULTS: We analyzed 51 patients with a median age of 40 years (IQR 31-58). Mean BOHSE score was 1.1 and OHIP-14 score was 1.4. Median epithelial thickness was 530 µm and lamina propria thickness was 150 µm. On age-adjusted analysis, increasing BOHSE and OHIP-14 were associated with decreasing epithelial thickness (p values <0.05). Higher BOHSE scores also correlated with thinner lamina proprias (p=0.05) and increased graft stretch (p=0.03). The 2 patients with postoperative urine leaks and available graft histology had lamina propria thicknesses well below the cohort median, at 50 µm and 60 µm. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate that oral health conditions impact graft histology and stretch. Although much remains to be learned, our findings shed light on the potential importance of optimizing oral health prior to BMG urethroplasty, and raise the question of if preoperative mucosal biopsy could help inform surgical decision making and discussions regarding surgical success.

Evaluating Race and Time to Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: The Mount Sinai Hospital Experience.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have found that Black patients with multiple myeloma undergo autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) less frequently than their white counterparts, although the factors leading to decreased access and utilization have not been fully elucidated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To identify whether racial differences in transplantation timing played a role in these disparities, we retrospectively analyzed 410 Black and white patients who received their first transplant at The Mount Sinai Hospital between 2011 and 2016 (260 white and 150 Black patients). We compared the time from initial diagnosis to stem-cell collection and the time from collection to transplantation between the 2 races while controlling for age, socioeconomic status, and functional status. RESULTS: Between Blacks and whites, time from diagnosis to collection was higher in Black patients (median 238, vs. 195 days, respectively, P = .051). Functional status, socioeconomic status, and age were also significantly associated with time to collection, and after controlling for these covariates, the effect of race was not significant (P = .0625). Conversely, time from collection to transplantation was increased in white patients compared to Black. CONCLUSION: Increased time from diagnosis to stem-cell collection for Black patients was driven in part by socioeconomic status and baseline functional status.

Use of Corneas From Septic Donors for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the suitability of corneas from septic donors for transplantation by analyzing the discard rate in the eye bank and the clinical outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) using organ-cultured corneal grafts from septic versus nonseptic donors. METHODS: This retrospective study included 1554 corneas of which 456 corneas (29%) were from septic and 1072 corneas (69%) from nonseptic donors [for 26 corneas (2%) sepsis status was unknown]. The clinical outcome at 6 months after DMEK was evaluated for 82 grafts (26 from septic and 56 from nonseptic donors). Outcome measures were endothelial cell density, central corneal thickness, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Primary discard rates were higher for corneas from septic than from nonseptic donors (32.9% vs. 24.5%, P = 0.001). The main discard reason was poor endothelial cell quality for both septic (13.8%) and nonseptic (11.8%) donor corneas. Eye bank contamination rates for septic and nonseptic donor corneas were 1.1% and 1.7%, respectively (P = 0.102). After DMEK, donor endothelial cell density at 6m postoperatively was comparable between grafts from septic and nonseptic donors (1410 ± 422 cells/mm vs. 1590 ± 519 cells/mm, P = 0.140). No differences in 6m central corneal thickness and in the rebubbling rate were observed between the 2 groups (P = 0.780 and P = 0.396, respectively). None of the cases had graft rejection nor endophthalmitis in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Provided strict adherence to donor screening and evaluation protocols, the use of organ-cultured corneas from septic donors for DMEK does not seem to increase the risk for recipients and allows for expansion of the donor pool for corneal tissue.

Assessment of National Organ Donation Rates and Organ Procurement Organization Metrics.

Importance: Organ transplant is a life-saving procedure for patients with end-stage organ failure. In the US, organ procurement organizations (OPOs) are responsible for the evaluation and procurement of organs from donors who have died; however, there is controversy regarding what measures should be used to evaluate their performance. Objective: To evaluate OPO performance metrics using combined mortality and donation data and quantify the associations of population demographics with donation metrics. Design, Setting, and Participants: This national cohort study includes data from the US organ transplantation system from January 2008 through December 2017. All individuals who died within the US, as reported by the National Death index, were included. Exposures: Death, organ donation, and donation eligibility. Main Outcomes and Measures: Evaluation of the variation in donation metrics and the use of ineligible donors by OPO and demographic subgroup. Results: This study included 17 501 742 deaths and 75 769 deceased organ donors (45 040 men [59.4%]; 51 908 White individuals [68.5%]). Of these donors, 15 857 (20.9%) were not eligible, as defined by the OPOs. The median donation metrics by OPO were 0.004 (range, 0.002-0.012) donors per death, 0.89 (range, 0.68-1.30) donors per eligible death, and 0.72 (range, 0.57-0.86) eligible donors per eligible death. The OPOs in the upper quartile of the overall eligible donors per eligible death metric were in the upper quartile of annual rankings on 90 of 140 occasions (64.3%). There was little overlap in top-performing OPOs between metrics; an OPO in the upper quartile for 1 metric was also in the upper quartile for the other metrics on 37 of 570 occasions (6.5% of the time). The median donor eligibility rate, defined as the number of eligible donors per donor, was 0.79 (range, 0.61-0.95) across OPOs. Age (eg, 65 to 84 years, coefficient, -0.55 [SE, 0.03]; P < .001; vs those aged 18 to 34 years), sex (male individuals, -0.09 [SE, 0.02]; P < .001; vs female individuals), race (eg, Black individuals, 0.35 [SE, 0.02]; P < .001; vs White individuals), cause of death (eg, central nervous system tumor, 0.48 [SE, 0.08]; P < .001; vs anoxia), year (eg, 2016-2017: -0.10 [SE, 0.03]; P < .001; vs 2008-2009), and OPO were associated with the use of ineligible donors; OPO was a significant factor associated with performance in all metrics (χ256, 500.5; P < .001; coefficient range across individual OPOs, -0.15 [SE, 0.09] to 0.75 [SE, 0.09]), even after accounting for population differences. Female and non-White individuals were significantly less likely to be used as ineligible donors. Conclusions and Relevance: We demonstrate significant variability in OPO performance rankings, depending on which donation metric is used. There were significant differences in OPO performance, even after accounting for differences in potential donor populations. Our data suggest significant variation in use of ineligible donors among OPOs, a source for increased donors. The performance of OPOs should be evaluated using a range of donation metrics.

Correlation Between the Mayo Adhesive Probability Score and the Operative Time in Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Adherent perinephric fat (APF) is a known risk factor of surgical difficulty during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). The Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score predicts APF accurately. The aim of this study is to identify the association between MAP score and operative time in LDN. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 154 kidney donors who underwent surgery from December 2017 to December 2019 at Istanbul Aydin University Hospital and Istinye University Hospital. All of the operations were done by 3 senior surgeons by a fully laparoscopic method. The MAP score was derived from computed tomography scans by 1 blinded reader. Demographic data, body mass index (BMI), MAP score, side selection, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), number of arteries and veins, operative time, hospital stay, and complications are recorded. Single and multiple variable analyses were used to evaluate the correlation between operative time and MAP score, BMI, side selection, and number of vascular structures. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients (79 men, 75 women) with a mean age of 44.4 ± 12.72 were included in this study. None of the cases were converted to open nephrectomy. There were no major complications. Mean BMI was 27.59 ± 4.32 kg/m2, mean MAP score was 0.69 ± 1.15, and mean operative time was 40.25 ± 9.81 minutes. Although mean BMI was higher in women (28.19 ± 4.52 vs 27.03 ± 4.07; P < .05), mean MAP score was lower than in men (0.35 ± 0.86 vs 1.03 ± 1.29; P < .001). Older age, higher BMI, higher MAP score, and presence of multiple renal arteries were associated with longer operative time of LDN. The MAP score was associated with older age, male sex and higher BMI. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that different risk factors can affect operative time in LDN. The MAP score was significantly associated with longer operative time, especially in men, so it can be useful for predicting surgical difficulty in kidney donors.

Living donation - any news on the donor?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Living kidney donation has been an established practice for many years. Although studies from the past decade have uncovered risks to the donor, living kidney donation is still promoted. In this review, the most recent studies are summarized. RECENT FINDINGS: Retrospective studies with long follow-up have detected an increased risk of hypertension among donors. Donors with hypertension at the time of donation may be at increased risk of adverse outcomes, but results differ. Recent studies have not found increased long-term mortality, but follow-up is short and control groups are of different quality. SUMMARY: In all, the most recent findings more or less corroborate previous knowledge in the field of living donation. There is still a need for new studies on mortality with appropriate control groups and long enough follow-up.

Predictive factors for the development of anemia after hematopoietic stem cell donation.

BACKGROUND: Although Hematopoietic Stem Cells (HSC) donation through bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) are usually safe procedures, adverse events are expected. One of the most common events especially among BM donors (BMD) is the development of anemia. To protect the BMD and preserve the hemoglobin levels, many centers collect autologous pre-procedure blood, but the actual benefits of this procedure is controversial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study analyzed retrospectively data to observe what factors may influence the occurrence of post-donation anemia and also evaluate the relevance of autologous red blood cell pre procedure donation (PAD). RESULTS: The development of immediately post donation anemia (IP) was higher in BMD than in PB donors (64.2% BMD and 10.7% PBD, P < .001) and also in late post donation (LP) (28.4% BMD and 3.6% PBD, P = .007). The study demonstrated an association between PAD and anemia in IP (72.7% with anemia and 27.3% without anemia, P = .006) and an association between the volume of red blood cells in the donated hematopoietic product and the development of anemia in LP (356.3 mL and 297.8 mL, P = .037). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, collection of HSC through BM is a risk factor for anemia and PAD is a risk factor for IP anemia.

Transplantation of discarded livers following viability testing with normothermic machine perfusion.

There is a limited access to liver transplantation, however, many organs are discarded based on subjective assessment only. Here we report the VITTAL clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02740608) outcomes, using normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) to objectively assess livers discarded by all UK centres meeting specific high-risk criteria. Thirty-one livers were enroled and assessed by viability criteria based on the lactate clearance to levels ≤2.5 mmol/L within 4 h. The viability was achieved by 22 (71%) organs, that were transplanted after a median preservation time of 18 h, with 100% 90-day survival. During the median follow up of 542 days, 4 (18%) patients developed biliary strictures requiring re-transplantation. This trial demonstrates that viability testing with NMP is feasible and in this study enabled successful transplantation of 71% of discarded livers, with 100% 90-day patient and graft survival; it does not seem to prevent non-anastomotic biliary strictures in livers donated after circulatory death with prolonged warm ischaemia.

Preoperative assessment system for hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy by discriminant analysis.

We developed a preoperative assessment system to predict surgical workload in hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALDNx) using the normal-based linear discriminant rule (NLDR). A total of 128 cases of left HALDNx performed by a single operator were used as training data. Surgical workload was measured by operative time. The optimized model had 9 explanatory variables: age, total protein, total cholesterol, number of renal arteries (numberRA), 4 variables of perinephric fat (PNF), and thickness of subcutaneous fat. This model was validated using cross-validation and the .632 estimator to estimate discrimination rates with future test data. PNF and numberRA were the predominant factors affecting workload followed by the computed tomography value of PNF, body weight, and male sex. The estimated accuracy of the prediction system was 94.6%. The complication rate was 9.38% and did not correlate with surgical workload. We also made our program available online for constructing assessment functions from other cohort data. In conclusion, the surgical workload of HALDNx could be predicted with PNF and numberRA as the dominant risk factors.

Heterogeneity of Human Pancreatic Islet Isolation Around Europe: Results of a Survey Study.

BACKGROUND: Europe is currently the most active region in the field of pancreatic islet transplantation, and many of the leading groups are actually achieving similar good outcomes. Further collaborative advances in the field require the standardization of islet cell product isolation processes, and this work aimed to identify differences in the human pancreatic islet isolation processes within European countries. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire about critical steps, including donor selection, pancreas processing, pancreas perfusion and digestion, islet counting and culture, islet quality evaluation, microbiological evaluation, and release criteria of the product, was completed by isolation facilities participating at the Ninth International European Pancreas and Islet Transplant Association (EPITA) Workshop on Islet-Beta Cell Replacement in Milan. RESULTS: Eleven islet isolation facilities completed the questionnaire. The facilities reported 445 and 53 islet isolations per year over the last 3 years from deceased organ donors and pancreatectomized patients, respectively. This activity resulted in 120 and 40 infusions per year in allograft and autograft recipients, respectively. Differences among facilities emerged in donor selection (age, cold ischemia time, intensive care unit length, amylase concentration), pancreas procurement, isolation procedures (brand and concentration of collagenase, additive, maximum acceptable digestion time), quality evaluation, and release criteria for transplantation (glucose-stimulated insulin secretion tests, islet numbers, and purity). Moreover, even when a high concordance about the relevance of one parameter was evident, thresholds for the acceptance were different among facilities. CONCLUSIONS: The result highlighted the presence of a heterogeneity in the islet cell product process and product release criteria.

Effect of surgeon's workload on rate of transection during follicular unit excision/extraction (FUE).

OBJECTIVES: To compare the transection rate at the start and at the end of the FUE procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in a private setup in patients undergoing first session of FUE surgery over 2000 grafts. Six areas of 1 cm2 were marked, two in midline and two on either side. All the procedures were undertaken by the single surgeon to avoid any bias. At the start of the surgery, the extraction of hair was performed in areas A1, A2, and A3. All the excised hair and transected hair were counted. The surgery was then completed but the remaining three areas (B1, B2, and B3) were left intact. Later, FUE was done in these areas. The excised hair and transected hair were counted. All the data were analyzed statistically by paired t test. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 35.2 years. The transection rate was 5.3/cm2 in mid-zone, 4.4/cm2 on right side, and 5.7/cm2 on left side at the start and 27.7/cm2 in mid-zone, 25.6/cm2 on right side, and 24.2/cm2 on left side at the end. The transection rate increased from 5.03 to 6.0/cm2 for FUS <2500 but increased from 4.83 to 6.6/cm2 with FUs over 2500 and increased from 5.5 to 6.67/cm2 when FUs were over 3000. CONCLUSION: The surgeon's workload increases the hair transection during FUE.

Is obesity a contraindication for kidney donation?

INTRODUCTION: To enlarge the donor pool, kidney donors with obesity have been considered. We hypothesized that it is safe for patients with obesity to serve as living kidney donors. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective analysis, we examined the effect of obesity (body mass index (BMI) of 30-35 kg/m2) on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and creatinine in patients undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Other outcomes included intraoperative, 30-, and 90-day complications. We examined the trajectory between patients with obesity versus patients without obesity over time using mixed effects models for the outcomes of creatinine in mg/dL and GFR in mL/min/1.73 m2. RESULTS: Among donors with obesity versus donors without obesity, there were no significant differences in demographics or comorbidities. Baseline creatinine in donors with obesity was significantly greater than that of donors without obesity (p = 0.02). Operative time was significantly longer in donors with obesity versus without obesity (p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in 30-day morbidity between donors with obesity versus without obesity (6.52 vs. 3.57%, respectively; p = 0.38). The rate of graft complications was 8.7% in donors with obesity versus 7.1% in donors without obesity (p = 1.0). 90-day complications were infrequent, and not significant different between the groups. At 6, 12, and 24-month postoperative follow-up, the mean creatinine level in patients with obesity was not significantly different from that of patients without obesity (1.23 vs. 1.31, 1.23 vs. 1.26, and 1.17 vs. 1.19 at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively). Mean GFR was also not significantly different at 6, 12, and, 24 months. CONCLUSION: Postoperative creatinine and GFR changes were not significantly different in patients with obesity versus without obesity after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. These findings suggest that carefully screened living kidney donors with obesity do not experience decreased postoperative renal function.

Logistic Coordination in Pediatric Liver Transplantation: Criteria for Optimization.

INTRODUCTION: Logistic organization of the transplantation coordination process aims to synchronize the recovery and recipient team and to reduce to a minimum the graft's cold ischemia time (CIT), which, in turn, is known, to have deleterious effects on the graft and recipient, if prolonged. To determine whether variables influencing the different steps in the coordination process might allow for reducing CIT, this study aimed to analyze these variables. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 61 pediatric liver transplantations from 2006 to 2015 in the Geneva University Hospitals. RESULTS: Length of donor hepatectomy was increased for split grafts (P < .0001). Length of recipient hepatectomy was longer in the case of previous surgery (P = .06). The recipient team waiting time for the graft was longer for split grafts (P = .01). The graft waiting time at the recipient site was longer for whole grafts (P = .0005) and increased recipient weight (P = .03). The graft waiting time at the donor site was doubled in the case of recovery of organs after the liver by the same team (P = .007). The graft waiting time at the donor and recipient site not surprisingly increased the CIT (P = .007 and < .0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: CIT depends on waiting times during the entire coordination process, which largely depends on the estimation of hepatectomy lengths. A more accurate estimation, considering graft type and recipient's previous surgery and weight, might allow for decreasing CIT and consequently improve outcomes after pediatric liver transplantation.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Systemic Infection in Deceased Donors.

BACKGROUND: Organ donation shortage is the primary barrier to all organ transplantations.Infectious disease transmission through transplantation is considered controversial for organ retrieval. Donors with bacteremia and sepsis are considered controversial for organ retrieval due to potential transmission of an infectious agent to the recipient. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the results of bacterial culture of the donor's blood from peripheral venous or central venous catheter, urine, and bronchial aspiration from the organ donation registries of 102 potential donors from the Ministry of Health and Tissue Transplant Coordination Center of Istanbul Region in 2015. RESULTS: Of the 102 deceased donors included in the analysis, 24 (23.5%) had infection. The most common sites of infection were the bloodstream (41.6%) and the respiratory system (37.5%). The most common isolated pathogens of the bacterial cultures were Gram-positive bacteria (21), Gram-negative microorganisms (14), and Candida (1). The significant risk factor for infection was duration of stay at the intensive care unit (median: 5 day; 25-75%: 3-5 day) (odds ratio, 2.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-8.12; P < .05). The presence of infection in the donor accounted for a significant part of the reasons why the organs were not accepted for transplantation (kidneys 9%, liver 4%, heart 6%). CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that deceased donors with prolonged stays in the intensive care unit have an increased risk for developing nosocomial infections; so there is a need for establishing and enforcing the prevention and control of infection in possible donors.

Cases of Brain Death and Organ Donation Rates in Eskisehir.

Brain death is defined as the irreversible loss of brain and brainstem functions, making organ harvesting legally possible. We have aimed to determine the current donation and harvesting rates in Eskisehir, Turkey to achieve further donation rates by improving the conditions. We have analyzed the data of brain death cases from Eskisehir Osmangazi University Hospital and 2 state hospitals based on a time interval between 2013 and 2017. The evaluation of 113 cases of brain death revealed that organ harvesting could be performed in 25.7% of those cases, whereas organ donation was not approved in 74.3% of those deceased patients due to refusal of the legally responsible relatives. The results of a study carried out in Bursa as the first-ranked province in the Organ Donation List of Turkey in 2012 suggested that relatives permitted organ donation in only 34.6% of 79 brain death cases between 2007 and 2014, whereas that rate was 8.8% of 4.9 cadaver donations per million persons in Bursa, Turkey. A comparison between the results of Eskisehir and a neighboring province showed that lower rates of organ donation in Eskisehir may be caused by absence of a transplantation center in the province, therefore, putting the transplantation center of the university hospital into service will accelerate the rates of organ donation in Eskisehir.

Reasons Why Organs From Deceased Donors Were Not Accepted for Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: The rate of organ donations from deceased donors in Turkey is among the lowest in the world. We analyzed the reasons why some potential donors whose families had given consent did not become actual solid organ donors. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the organ donation, retrieval, and transplantation registries of 102 potential donors from the Ministry of Health Organ and Tissue Transplant Coordination Centre of Istanbul Region from the year 2015. RESULTS: Cardiac arrest occurred in 8 of the potential donors while waiting for organ procurement or during surgery. The organ specific suitability ratio was 83% for kidneys, 82% for livers, 72% for hearts, and 75% for lungs. Of these suitable organs, the transplantation rates were as follows: kidneys 88%, livers 70%, hearts 30%, and lungs 13%. Medical reasons (donor unsuitable) (14%-24%) and poor organ function (2%-24%) were the reasons most organs were not accepted for transplant. These reasons included diabetes insipidus, electrolyte imbalance caused by neuro-humoral changes, inotrope/vasopressor requirement for hemodynamic instability, hypoperfusion, and myocardial dysfunction after brain death. CONCLUSION: The mismatch between organ donation and demand is a major problem worldwide. In addition to low organ donation rates, late diagnosis of potential donors or inappropriate management of the pathophysiological consequences of brain death reduce the number of transplantable organs even more in our country. In order to overcome these setbacks, we need education programs to improve quality and decrease donor losses in an intensive care unit goal-directed protocol for the management of potential donors.

Safety and Risk Factors of Pure Laparoscopic Living Donor Right Hepatectomy: Comparison to Open Technique in Propensity Score-matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The innovative pure laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy (LLDRH) procedure for liver transplantation has never been fully compared to open living donor right hepatectomy (OLDRH). We aimed to compare the donor safety and graft results of pure LLDRH to those of OLDRH. METHODS: From May 2013 to July 2017, 288 consecutive donors underwent either OLDRH (n = 197) or pure LLDRH (n = 91). After propensity score matching, 72 donors were included in each group. The primary outcome was postoperative complications during a 90-day follow-up period. Comprehensive complication index, duration of hospital stay, need for additional pain control, readmission, and donor outcomes were also compared. RESULTS: The incidence of major complication during the 90-day follow-up was higher in the LLDRH group than the OLDRH group (6.6% vs 15.4%, P = 0.017) but was not statistically significant in propensity-matched analysis (11.1% vs 13.9%, odds ratio [OR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-3.51; P = 0.62). A right hepatic duct <1 cm was independently associated with complication in the pure LLDRH group (odds ratio, 4.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-14.99; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In the initial 91 pure LLDRH cases, incidence of major complication was higher than in the OLDRH group, but the difference was not significant in propensity-matched analysis. A right hepatic duct verified as <1 cm may be related to increased frequency of complications in pure LLDRH donors. Further analysis is needed.

Analysis of organ procurement from non-heart-beating donors over a 10-year period in Madrid. / Análisis de la donación en asistolia no controlada durante 10 años en la Comunidad de Madrid.

OBJECTIVES: The Autonomous Community of Madrid procures the largest number of organs from uncontrolled non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) after circulatory death in Spain. The aim of this study was to analyze the yield of these donations in terms of viable organs procured (category IIa) according to information extracted from the CORE registry of the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT) for the Madrid area. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of NHBD data registered between 2007 and 2017, including age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), emergency care times, method of chest compressions applied (mechanical cardiopump vs manual compressions), and viable organs extracted. RESULTS: A total of 679 circulatory death donors were registered; 458 (67.6%) of them were utilized donors. The median BMI correlated negatively (-0.161) with the number of viable organs extracted (P<.001). The method of applying chest compressions significantly influenced liver viability: only those extracted after mechanical cardiopump compressions were viable for transplantation. Type of compressions did not effect kidney or lung viability. CONCLUSION: Variables to bear in mind as predictors of success in NHBD donation are BMI and type of chest compressions applied.

OBJETIVO: La Comunidad de Madrid es líder en donación en asistolia no controlada (DANC) en España. El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar la rentabilidad de los órganos extraídos válidos de los donantes (categoría IIa) del Registro Nacional Integrado de Información de Donación y Trasplante de la ONT (Registro CORE), correspondientes a esta comunidad. METODO: Estudio observacional retrospectivo entre 2007 y 2017 de las DANC, analizando las variables edad, talla, peso, índice de masa corporal (IMC), tiempos asistenciales, tipo de compresión torácica recibida durante la reanimación cardiopulmonar (cardiocompresor mecánico vs compresión torácica manual) y órganos extraídos válidos. RESULTADOS: Se registraron 679 donantes, de los que fueron donantes efectivos el 67,6% (n = 458). Se observó una correlación negativa (−0,161) entre la mediana del índice de masa corporal y la mediana del número de órganos extraídos válidos (p < 0,001). También se observó una influencia estadísticamente significativa del tipo de cardiocompresión realizada y la viabilidad del hígado, puesto que solo los extraídos tras reanimación con cardiocompresión mecánica fueron válidos para trasplante. CONCLUSIONES: El IMC y el uso de cardiocompresores mecánicos son variables predictoras a tener en cuenta ante una posible DANC.

Battle of the punches: Comparison of transection rates of different punches during FUE.

OBJECTIVES: To know the transection rate using three different kinds of punches of the same size (0.9 mm). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in 10 patients undergoing FUE. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients. In each patient, five areas of 1 cm2 were selected in three rows (each row having five areas of 1 cm2 ). For each row, one kind of punch (sharp, serrated, and blunt) was used. The rows were selected randomly (single-blind). The machine was set at a constant speed of 1200-1500 g. The grafts were harvested with the patient in lying position, the surgeon sitting on head side, and the harvesting started from the right side of the patient to left side. For each box, the FUs and hair were calculated. The harvested FUs were checked under microscope. Any transection (complete or incomplete) was calculated. All the data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: The total hair yield was maximum with blunt punch (268.4) followed by serrated (247.2) and sharp (207.6). Similarly, the maximum FU yield was 155 using serrated punch followed by 154.4 by blunt and 147.2 in sharp punch. The hair:FUs was highest in blunt punch (1:1.738) vs serrated punch (1:1.595) vs sharp punch (1:1.410). The transection rate was highest with sharp punch (23.9%) followed by serrated (18.8%) and blunt punch (14.5%). CONCLUSION: The graft:hair ratio was maximum using blunt punch. Sharp punch resulted in maximum transection rate with lowest graft:hair ratio.