Molecular epidemiology and risk factors associated with BK and JC polyomavirus urinary shedding after kidney allograft.

Polyomaviruses BK (BKPyV) and JC (JCPyV), belonging to the Polyomaviridae, are responsible for human pathologies. In kidney transplant recipients, BKPyV replication can lead to irreversible nephron damage whereas JCPyV replication remains asymptomatic. Concomitant replication is rare and potential competition between the infections has been described. The aim of this retrospective case-control study was to describe the molecular epidemiology and risk factors associated with BKPyV and JCPyV replication in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients. In total, 655 urine samples from 460 patients were tested for BKPyV and JCPyV DNA. Positive samples were submitted to strain genotyping. Demographic and clinical characteristics were also compared. Isolated JCPyV and BKPyV was found in 16.5% and 23.3% of patients, respectively; co-replication was rare (3.9%). BKPyV strains Ib-2, Ib-1, and IVc-2 were the most prevalent. JCPyV strains mostly belonged to genotypes 4 and 1B. During follow-up, JCPyV shedding significantly reduced the risk of BKPyV DNAuria, with an odds ratio of 0.57 (95% confidence interval: 0.35-0.99), and was associated with better prognosis than BKPyV replication, based on the estimated glomerular filtration rate. Molecular epidemiology of BKPyV and JCPyV strains in our region was similar to previous studies. This study suggests that JCPyV is benign and appears to limit damaging BKPyV replication. JCPyV DNAuria screening could thus be a useful strategy to predict BKPyV-related outcomes.

BK Viremia and Viruria Does Not Depend on the Type of Double-J Stent Used During Kidney Transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: BK virus is a major cause of chronic renal allograft failure.Transplant ureteral stent use has been reported as a risk factorfor BK virus infection. Recently, the use of a new type of ureteral stent (Magnetic Black Star) was reported in kidney transplant recipients. The aim ofthis preliminary report was to compare BK virus viremia and viruria occurrence depending on the type of double-J stent (standard versus Magnetic Black Star). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included all kidney transplants performed in our center from January to December 2022. Each case had double-J stent placement. Indwelling stents were either a 6- or 7-Fr standard double-J stent or a 6-Fr Magnetic Black Star double-J stent. The type of double-J stent was chosen according to the surgeon's preference. A standard BK virus screening protocol was followed during the study period, which consisted of routine polymerase chain reaction examination of plasma and urine samples during monthly follow-ups. RESULTS: We assessed 120 patients without missing data: 92 patients received standard double-J stents and 28 patients received Magnetic Black Star stents. Patients were mostly male in the standard group (70.7%) versus the Magnetic Black Star group (42.9%) (P = .01). ABO- and HLA-incompatible transplant rates were similar in both groups. BK viremia occurrence and BK viruria occurrence were similar between groups at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study showed no differences concerning BKvirus infection depending on the type of double-J stents used during kidney transplant.

Prevalence and genotype distribution of JC polyomavirus in urine from patients with hematological malignancies in Vietnam.

JC virus (JCV) causes progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in immunocompromised patients. The prevalence and genotype patterns of JCV vary between different geographical regions. This study was done to investigate the prevalence and genotype distribution of JCV in patients with hematological malignancies in Vietnam. A total of 48 urine samples were collected from patients with hematological malignancies. DNA was extracted and detection of JCV was by nested-polymerase chain reaction. Sequence analysis was obtained and a phylogenetic tree was constructed for genotyping of JCV. Twenty-seven (56.25%) urine samples tested positive for JCV. JCV genotype 7 was only observed in this study. Subtype analysis showed that JCV subtype 7A was the most commonly prevalent, followed by 7B1 and 7C1. Other subtypes were not detected in this population. There were no significant differences associated with age, gender, and biochemical parameters between patients with JCV and without JCV excretion in urine. The present study showed a high prevalence of JCV in the urine of patients with hematologic malignancies. The most common genotype found in this population was JCV subtype 7A.

In Vivo Generation of BK and JC Polyomavirus Defective Viral Genomes in Human Urine Samples Associated with Higher Viral Loads.

Defective viral genomes (DVGs) are parasitic viral sequences containing point mutations, deletions, or duplications that might interfere with replication. DVGs are often associated with viral passage at high multiplicities of infection in culture systems but have been increasingly reported in clinical specimens. To date however, only RNA viruses have been shown to contain DVGs in clinical specimens. Here, using direct deep sequencing with multiple library preparation strategies and confirmatory digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) of urine samples taken from immunosuppressed individuals, we show that clinical BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) and JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) strains contain widespread genomic rearrangements across multiple loci that likely interfere with viral replication. BKPyV DVGs were derived from BKPyV genotypes Ia, Ib-1, and Ic. The presence of DVGs was associated with specimens containing higher viral loads but never reached clonality, consistent with a model of parasitized replication. These DVGs persisted during clinical infection as evidenced in two separate pairs of samples containing BK virus collected from the same individual up to 302 days apart. In a separate individual, we observed the generation of DVGs after a 57.5-fold increase in viral load. In summary, by extending the presence of DVGs in clinical specimens to DNA viruses, we demonstrate the ubiquity of DVGs in clinical virology.IMPORTANCE Defective viral genomes (DVGs) can have a significant impact on the production of infectious virus particles. DVGs have only been identified in cultured viruses passaged at high multiplicities of infection and RNA viruses collected from clinical specimens; no DNA virus in the wild has been shown to contain DVGs. Here, we identified BK and JC polyomavirus DVGs in clinical urine specimens and demonstrated that these DVGs are more frequently identified in samples with higher viral loads. The strains containing DVGs had rearrangements throughout their genomes, with the majority affecting genes required for viral replication. Longitudinal analysis showed that these DVGs can persist during an infection but do not reach clonality within the chronically infected host. Our identification of polyomavirus DVGs suggests that these parasitic sequences exist across the many classes of viruses capable of causing human disease.

A rare urinary JC virus reactivation after long-term therapy with rituximab.

The possible role of JC virus in determining urinary tract involvement has only recently been recognized. The case of a man with laboratory-confirmed JC virus replication in the urine after a maintenance schedule of rituximab administered for a lymphoproliferative disorder is reported herein. The patient developed severe renal and urinary tract impairment, characterized by the onset of nephropathy, bilateral ureteral strictures, and a serious reduction in vesical compliance, ultimately requiring an ileal neobladder configuration. The renal and urinary tract involvement was finally attributed to JC virus reactivation. This observation suggests that renal and urinary tract diseases related to JC virus might be associated with long-term rituximab treatment.

Deciphering the Prognostic and Predictive Value of Urinary CXCL10 in Kidney Recipients With BK Virus Reactivation.

BK virus (BKV) replication increases urinary chemokine C-X-C motif ligand 10 (uCXCL10) levels in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Here, we investigated uCXCL10 levels across different stages of BKV replication as a prognostic and predictive marker for functional decline in KTRs after BKV-DNAemia. uCXCL10 was assessed in a cross-sectional study (474 paired urine/blood/biopsy samples and a longitudinal study (1,184 samples from 60 KTRs with BKV-DNAemia). uCXCL10 levels gradually increased with urine (P-value < 0.0001) and blood BKV viral load (P < 0.05) but were similar in the viruria and no BKV groups (P > 0.99). In viremic patients, uCXCL10 at biopsy was associated with graft functional decline [HR = 1.65, 95% CI (1.08-2.51), P = 0.02], irrespective of baseline eGFR, blood viral load, or BKVN diagnosis. uCXL10/cr (threshold: 12.86 ng/mmol) discriminated patients with a low risk of graft function decline from high-risk patients (P = 0.01). In the longitudinal study, the uCXCL10 and BKV-DNAemia trajectories were superimposable. Stratification using the same uCXCL10/cr threshold at first viremia predicted the subsequent inflammatory response, assessed by time-adjusted uCXCL10/cr AUC (P < 0.001), and graft functional decline (P = 0.03). In KTRs, uCXCL10 increases in BKV-DNAemia but not in isolated viruria. uCXCL10/cr is a prognostic biomarker of eGFR decrease, and a 12.86 ng/ml threshold predicts higher inflammatory burdens and poor renal outcomes.

Incidence and risk factors for high-level BK viruria: a single center study in China.

BACKGROUND: BK virus allograft nephropathy is a serious complication after kidney transplantation, and the effect of pre-emptive intervention for high-level BK viruria has been verified, but protocols after kidney transplantation for early identification of high-level viruria are lacking. METHODS: This was a single-center study. The clinical data of the kidney transplant recipients and their donors in our center from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018, were collected. The patients were divided into the high-level BK viruria group (Group A) and a non-high-level BK viruria group (Group B) according to the qPCR results of BK virus DNA loads in urine samples. Significant variables were screened out by univariate analysis, and then the results were incorporated into a multivariate logistic regression model to analyze the independent risk factors for high-level BK viruria. RESULTS: A total of 262 recipients were included in the study. The incidence of high-level BK viruria was 13.4% (n = 35), and the median time of detection was 181 (range 91-1119) days. Univariate analysis showed that donor type ([Formula: see text] = 21.770, P < 0.001), history of ATG/ATG-F application ([Formula: see text] = 4.543, P = 0.033), acute rejection (AR) ([Formula: see text] = 8.313, P = 0.004) and delayed graft function (DGF) ([Formula: see text] = 21.170, P < 0.001) were related to high-level BK viruria. After the inclusion of the multivariate logistic regression model, the results showed deceased brain and cardiac donors (P = 0.032, OR = 3.927, 95% CI 1.122-13.746), AR (P = 0.022, OR = 4.709, 95% CI 1.253-17.697) and DGF (P = 0.001, OR = 6.682, 95% CI 2.288-19.518). CONCLUSIONS: Donation by deceased brain and cardiac patients, history of AR and DGF were independent risk factors for high-level BK viruria after kidney transplantation.

Urine Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Helps Discriminate BK Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy in Kidney Transplant Recipients With BK Polyomavirus Infection.

Background: Studies have shown that plasma donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) can predict renal allograft antibody-mediated rejection. This study was performed to evaluate the value of urine dd-cfDNA concentration and dd-cfDNA fraction (%) for discriminating BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) in kidney transplant recipients with urinary BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection. Methods: In this retrospective single-center observational study, we enrolled kidney transplant recipients who were diagnosed with urine BKPyV infection between August 2018 and May 2019 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Urine dd-cfDNA was measured by using a novel target region capture sequencing methodology. The pathological diagnosis of BKPyVAN was confirmed by anti-SV40-T immunohistochemical staining and classified using the American Society for Transplantation schema. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to investigate the relations of urine dd-cfDNA and dd-cfDNA% to intrarenal allograft BKPyV infection states. Results: In total, 93 patients were enrolled, including 40 cases of proven BKPyVAN, seven cases of probable BKPyVAN, 23 cases of possible BKPyVAN, and 23 cases of resolving BKPyVAN. Urine dd-cfDNA level in proven BKPyVAN (22.09 ± 21.27 ng/ml) was comparable to that in probable BKPyVAN (15.64 ± 6.73 ng/ml, P = 0.434) but was significantly higher than that in possible BKPyVAN (5.60 ± 3.53 ng/ml) and resolving BKPyVAN (5.30 ± 3.34 ng/ml) (both Ps < 0.05). Urine dd-cfDNA% of proven BKPyVAN (0.71 ± 0.21) was lower than that of probable BKPyVAN (0.91 ± 0.04, P < 0.001), but was significantly higher than that of possible BKPyVAN (0.56 ± 0.30) and resolving BKPyVAN (0.46 ± 0.28) (both Ps < 0.05). For distinguishing biopsy-proven BKPyVAN from biopsy-excluded BKPyVAN, the discrimination capacity of urine dd-cfDNA (AUC: 0.842, 95% CI: 0.735, 0.918) was superior to that of plasma BKPyV DNA load (AUC: 0.660, 95% CI: 0.537, 0.769) with 0.181 (95% CI: 0.043, 0.319) difference between areas under ROC curves (P = 0.010). Conclusion: The elevated urine dd-cfDNA level may help discriminate BKPyVAN in kidney transplant recipients with BKPyV viruria.

Analysis of viruses present in urine from patients with interstitial cystitis.

The question of whether some cases of interstitial cystitis may have an infectious etiology has been debated for some time. Previous studies have looked for the presence of certain specific viruses, but generally did not use the types of sensitive and unbiased approaches that are currently available. As part of the MAPP (Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Chronic Pelvic Pain) Research Network, we examined urine specimens from interstitial cystitis patients who provided specimens over time and also reported various symptoms at the time of urine collection. We first performed next-generation sequencing to look for the presence of viruses in urines, and detected two human polyomaviruses that are known to be excreted into urine, BKPyV and JCPyV. We were especially interested in BKPyV because it is a known cause of another bladder disease, hemorrhagic cystitis, in bone marrow transplant recipients. Further analysis of individual samples indicates a trend toward higher excretion of polyomaviruses in patients experiencing increased symptoms.

Polyomavirus (BK) cytopathic effect in urine cytology is not associated with high risk of developing high-grade urothelial carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Polyomavirus cytopathic effect (BK-CPE) is classified as "negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma" (NHGUC) in the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology. However, polyomaviruses have been historically associated with tumor development and have been recently reported as an independent risk factor for renourinary carcinoma in transplant patients. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between polyomavirus infection in the urinary tract and the subsequent risk of developing high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) in the general population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was conducted to assess BK-CPE in all urinary cytology examinations performed from 2009 to 2011 for cases with an interpretation of NHGUC, NHGUC with BK, atypical urothelial cells (AUCs), or AUCs with BK. The endpoint of the present study was a diagnosis of HGUC on either bladder biopsy or urine cytology for those patients with subsequent follow-up data. RESULTS: A total of 252 cases with a urinary cytology interpretation of NHGUC, 234 with NHGUC + BK, 255 with AUCs, and 64 with AUCs + BK were identified. The surgical and cytological follow-up data showed that the overall risk of the development of HGUC for those with NHGUC, NHGUC + BK, AUCs, and AUCs + BK was 6.0%, 6.8%, 23.5%, and 12.5%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between the patients with NHGUC and those with NHGUC + BK. A statistically significant difference was found for patients with AUCs compared with patients with NHGUC + BK and those with AUCs + BK (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of BK-CPE in urine cytology samples does not increase the overall risk of the development of HGUC. Our results support the recommendation from the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology to place urine samples with BK-CPE in the NHGUC category.

Impact of extended infusional mesna prophylaxis on the incidence of BK viruria and hemorrhagic cystitis following post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and CTLA4Ig-based haploidentical transplantation.

Hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) has been reported with increased frequency following post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) along with a strong association with BK viruria. We prospectively evaluated the incidence of BK viruria and HC in 115 patients (median age 20 years, 2-65) undergoing PTCy-based haploidentical HCT with (n = 71) or without (n = 44) CTLA4Ig. HC prophylaxis consisted of a continuous infusion of mesna 30 min prior and 48 h post-PTCy. The overall incidence of BK viruria was 65.7%. None with BK viruria < 104 copies/ml developed clinical symptoms (n = 65). The incidence of BK viruria ≥ 104 copies/ml was 7.1% (n = 8) and 75% developed HC. The incidence of HC was 5.4% at a median of 30 days. Both BK viruria ≥ 104 copies/ml and HC were strongly associated with acute GVHD (p < 0.001). A higher NRM was observed in those with BK viruria ≥ 104 copies/ml, related to GVHD and its complications (41.7% vs 12.6%, p = 0.04). The incidences of acute GVHD, vis-à-vis, overall BK viruria, BK viruria ≥ 104 copies/ml, and HC, tended to be lower in patients receiving CTLA4Ig. Thus, extended infusional mesna, coupled with significant reduction in alloreactivity along with possible preservation of antiviral immunity associated with the use of CTLA4Ig, was probably responsible for a much lower incidence of BK viruria and resultant HC than reported previously following PTCy-based haploidentical HCT.

Detection of BKV encoded mature MicroRNAs in kidney transplant patients: Clinical and biologic insights.

BACKGROUND: Polyomavirus BK (BKV) encodes two mature miRNAs that regulate the viral life cycle. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the autoregulatory and immunomodulatory effects of these miRNAs that have been defined in culture systems, but subject to only limited exploration in clinical samples. METHODS: BKV-miR-B1-5p, BKV-miR-BJ1-3p, BKV DNA and BKV VP-1 mRNA levels were measured in 32 paired obtained plasma & urine samples from kidney transplant patients with (a) early stage infection manifesting as viruria, and (b) later stage infections complicated by viremia. RESULTS: All patients showed abundant urine miRNAs (7.84E + 02-1.91E + 06 copies/ml, but plasma miRNA was below the limit of detection. There was no statistically significant difference in urinary miRNA levels between viruric and viremic patients. Median 5p miRNA load was 4-6 logs lower than the BKV genomic load. Higher miRNA levels in the urine were associated not with lower but higher urinary viral loads. BKV preferentially used the 3p miRNA for its interactions with host cell mRNAs. The mean ratio of 5p/3p in patients with viruria was 0.09, and 0.03 in patients with viremia. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that immune evasion functions of BKV miRNAs over-ride the negative autoregulatory feedback effects in kidney transplant patients with active viral replication.

Predictive Value of the Combination of Peripheral Blood Lymphocyte Count and Urinary Cytology in BK Polyomavirus-associated Nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Graft biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN), and polymerase chain reaction is the most specific screening technique. Development of a noninvasive, cost-effective marker for BKPyVAN is important. METHODS: We reviewed 492 adult kidney transplant patients. We investigated peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) count and urinary cytology at graft biopsy in patients with BKVPyAN (n = 21), acute T-cell-mediated rejection (n = 79), and no evidence of acute rejection (n = 149). We performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics analyses to compare the test performance of PBL count, urinary cytology, and their combination for diagnosis of BKPyVAN. RESULTS: The PBL count at biopsy was significantly lower in the BKPyVAN group than the acute T-cell-mediated rejection and no acute rejection groups (959 ± 290/µL, 1433 ± 673/µL, and 1531 ± 549/µL, respectively; P < .01). The PBL count was 959 ± 290/µL at diagnosis of BKPyVAN and increased to 1123 ± 377/µL, 1238 ± 419/µL, and 1292 ± 491/µL at 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment, respectively (P < .05). On univariate analysis, the area under the curve was significantly higher for the combined model than for PBL and cytology alone (0.930, 0.797, and 0.875, respectively; P < .01). The improved test performance in the combined model remained significant after multivariate adjustment (0.972, 0.844, and 0.928, respectively; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Decreased PBL count was found in BKPyVAN, and the predictive performance of the combination of PBL count and urinary cytology was significantly enhanced for diagnosis of BKPyVAN.

Impact of Pretransplant Donor BK Viruria in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: BK virus (BKV) is a significant cause of nephropathy in kidney transplantation. The goal of this study was to characterize the course and source of BKV in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: We prospectively collected pretransplant plasma and urine samples from living and deceased kidney donors and performed BKV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) testing on pretransplant and serially collected posttransplant samples in kidney transplant recipients. RESULTS: Among deceased donors, 8.1% (17/208) had detectable BKV DNA in urine prior to organ procurement. BK viruria was observed in 15.4% (6/39) of living donors and 8.5% (4/47) of deceased donors of recipients at our institution (P = .50). BKV VP1 sequencing revealed identical virus between donor-recipient pairs to suggest donor transmission of virus. Recipients of BK viruric donors were more likely to develop BK viruria (66.6% vs 7.8%; P < .001) and viremia (66.6% vs 8.9%; P < .001) with a shorter time to onset (log-rank test, P < .001). Though donor BKV IgG titers were higher in recipients who developed BK viremia, pretransplant donor, recipient, and combined donor/recipient serology status was not associated with BK viremia (P = .31, P = .75, and P = .51, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Donor BK viruria is associated with early BK viruria and viremia in kidney transplant recipients. BKV PCR testing of donor urine may be useful in identifying recipients at risk for BKV complications.

Automated Intelligent Microscopy for the Recognition of Decoy Cells in Urine Samples of Kidney Transplant Patients.

BACKGROUND: BK virus (BKV)-associated nephropathy is definitely involved in allograft failure after kidney transplant. Thus, the need for an early control of viral reactivation in immunocompromised patients is well established. Determination of urinary release of decoy cells (DC) and BK viral load in plasma and urine by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) usually precedes renal biopsy. The aim of the study is to assess viral reactivation by BKV-DNA PCR and DC detection in urinary sediment using automated intelligent microscopy. METHODS: Seventy-eight kidney transplant patients were analyzed for the presence of plasma BKV-DNA by quantitative TaqMan real-time PCR. Additionally, automated intelligent microscopy was used for urine sediment analysis, allowing to count cells with decoy feature, confirmed by phase contrast microscopic review. RESULTS: Plasma BKV-DNA PCR was detected in 14 (17.9%) patients. DC were identified in 19 (24.3%) urine sediments by automated analyzers and confirmed by microscopic observation. Two patients were BKV-DNA-positive/DC-negative; conversely, 7 subjects were DC-positive/BKV-DNA-negative. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma quantification of BK viral load is currently the best noninvasive method for the detection of viral reactivation. Nevertheless, automated methods to screen for the presence of DC in urine could facilitate early BK virus replication diagnosis and patient follow-up by quantitative and visual results.

Investigation of BK Virus by Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction in Patients With Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: BK virus (BKV) is a common human polyomavirus and causes latent infection. Especially in immunosuppressive patients, early diagnosis and treatment are very important in reducing the high mortality rate. In this study, we investigated BKV DNA in serum and plasma and urine specimens by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: BKV DNA was isolated in QIAsymphony SP/AS (Hilden, Germany) equipment using QIAsymphony DSP Virus/Pathogen Midi Kit, Version 1 (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) in urine and serum samples collected from 100 patients post-transplantation. Artus BKV QS-RGQ, V1 (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) kit for BKV PCR was prepared according to the company recommendations and loaded on Qiagen Rotor Gene (Hilden, Germany). It was evaluated with PCR, and >27 copies/mL was considered as positive. RESULTS: BKV DNA was positive in 57% of the urine specimens obtained; only 25% of the patients were found to have a significant BKV burden in the urine according to the American Society of Transplantation, suggesting a risk of developing nephropathy. Serum samples of the same patients were negative for BKV DNA in 94 cases and they were positive for BKV DNA at interval between 44 and 319 copies/mL in 6 patients, and none of the patients had clinically significant BKV DNA in serum samples. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring the viral load with urine samples were thought to be more convenient for the detection of BKV reactivation in our study.

Prediction of BK viremia by urine viral load in renal transplant patients: An analysis of BK viral load results in paired urine and plasma samples.

BK virus (BKPyV)-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) may affect up to 10% of renal transplant recipients, causing graft failure in the absence of intervention. The dilemma in monitoring BKPyVAN in renal transplant patients has been that only testing urine BK viral load represents higher sensitivity (earlier detection) but lower specificity, while testing plasma BK viral load represents lower sensitivity (later detection) but higher specificity. However, blindly testing both urine and plasma inevitably contributes to unnecessary medical cost. We analyzed 1030 paired urine and plasma BKPyV viral load results and identified a reliable urine BKPyV viral load cutoff (4.0 log IU/mL) that can predict BKPyV viremia with 99.7% negative predictive value (NPV). We propose a cost-effective screening algorithm to first only monitor the urine BKPyV levels until the viral load reaches 4.0 log IU/mL, and then only monitor plasma with higher frequency. This approach ensures 98.7% sensitivity of catching the earliest BKPyV viremia onset, and 100% sensitivity of detecting the critical BKPyV viremia. In addition, we identified a urine BKPyV viral load cutoff of 6.7 log IU/mL as predictive of critical BKPyV viremia (defined as plasma viral load >4.0 log IU/mL) with 100% sensitivity and 100% NPV.

Impact of donor BK polyomavirus replication on recipient infections in living donor transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Multiple risk factors for BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) replication after kidney transplantation have been described. Here, we investigated the impact of living donors' urinary BKPyV shedding and recipients' BKPyV antibody status pre-transplant on BKPyV replication during the first year post-transplantation. METHODS: We assessed a cohort of living kidney donors and their paired recipients (n = 121). All donors were tested before transplantation, and recipients were tested before and after transplantation for BKPyV viruria and viremia. BKPyV-specific serology was assessed in all recipients at transplantation. RESULTS: Ten of 121 donors (8.3%) had urinary BKPyV shedding pre-transplant, none had viremia. Overall, 33 (27.3%) recipients developed viruria after transplantation: 7 had received a kidney from a donor with BK viruria (7/10 positive donors) and 26 had received a kidney from a donor without BK viruria (26/111 negative donors; P = .0015). Fifteen (12.4%) recipients developed BK viremia after transplantation: 3 received a kidney from a donor with viruria (3/10 positive donors, 30%) and 12 received a kidney from a donor without viruria (12/111 negative donors, 11%; P = .08). One patient developed proven nephropathy. Ninety-one percent of recipients were seropositive for BKPyV. No relationship between recipients' sero-reactivity at transplantation and post-transplant BKPyV replication was observed. Pre-transplant donor urinary shedding was an independent risk factor for post-transplant BKPyV replication. CONCLUSION: Screening living kidney donors for BKPyV can identify recipients at higher risk for BKPyV replication after transplantation who may benefit from intensified post-transplant screening and treatment strategies.

JC and BK virus DNA detection in archival slides of urine cytospin from renal transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Although identifying cytological viral inclusions (decoy cells) in the urine is relatively easy, distinguishing between Polyomaviruses BKV and JCV is not possible. Few studies have been published regarding JCV detection in kidney transplant recipients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of BKV and JCV DNA in archival slides of urine cytospin material from renal transplant patients. METHODS: A total of 44 urine specimens were evaluated cytologically for the presence of viral inclusions (decoy cells) and by nested polymerase chain reaction to differentiate between JCV and BKV in DNA isolated from archival slides of urine cytospin material. RESULTS: Of the 44 urine specimen donors, 9 (20.5%) patients had at least 1 sample with alterations suggestive of or compatible with viral infection (decoy cells), and 3 had urine samples with cellular atypias/neoplasias. Additionally, 24/44 (54.5%) patients had PCR-positive DNA for Polyomavirus in at least 1 sample, including 11/44 who were positive for BKV (25%) and 16/44 who were positive for JCV (36.36%), with 3 (6.8%) patients showing viral coinfection. Regarding transplantation time, only JCV was statistically significant (P = .019) for periods longer than 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the potential use of archival slides of urine cytospin material to differentiate BKV and JCV and demonstrate the importance of improved JCV detection for later kidney transplant recipients.

Absence of JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) viremia in early post-transplant JCPyV nephropathy: A case report.

JC polyomavirus (JCPyV)-associated nephropathy (JCPyVAN) occurs in <3% of PVAN cases after renal transplantation. We report the first confirmed case to our knowledge of JCPyVAN diagnosed by kidney biopsy in the early 6 months post transplant in Thailand. In this case report, recovery of renal allograft function was not observed after reduction of immunosuppressive agents and administration of intravenous immunoglobulin and cidofovir. Despite persistent JCPyV viruria, no significant further decline in allograft function was documented at 15 months post transplant.