RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: With an annual budget of more than $2 billion, the Health Resources and Services Administration's Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (RWHAP) is the third largest source of public funding for HIV care and treatment in the United States, yet little analysis has been done to quantify the long-term public health and economic impacts of the federal program. METHODS: Using an agent-based, stochastic model, we estimated health care costs and outcomes over a 50-year period in the presence of the RWHAP relative to those expected to prevail if the comprehensive and integrated system of medical and support services funded by the RWHAP were not available. We made a conservative assumption that, in the absence of the RWHAP, only uninsured clients would lose access to these medical and support services. RESULTS: The model predicts that the proportion of people with HIV who are virally suppressed would be 25.2 percentage points higher in the presence of the RWHAP (82.6 percent versus 57.4 percent without the RWHAP). The number of new HIV infections would be 18 percent (190,197) lower, the number of deaths among people with HIV would be 31 percent (267,886) lower, the number of quality-adjusted life years would be 2.7 percent (5.6 million) higher, and the cumulative health care costs would be 25 percent ($165 billion) higher in the presence of the RWHAP relative to the counterfactual. Based on these results, the RWHAP has an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $29,573 per quality-adjusted life year gained compared with the non-RWHAP scenario. Sensitivity analysis indicates that the probability of transmitting HIV via male-to-male sexual contact and the cost of antiretroviral medications have the largest effect on the cost-effectiveness of the program. CONCLUSIONS: The RWHAP would be considered very cost-effective when using standard guidelines of less than the per capita gross domestic product of the United States. The results suggest that the RWHAP plays a critical and cost-effective role in the United States' public health response to the HIV epidemic.
Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Atención a la Salud/economía , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Costos de la Atención en Salud , United States Health Resources and Services Administration , Antirretrovirales/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por VIH/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economía , Estados Unidos , United States Health Resources and Services Administration/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Early prenatal care is vital for improving maternal health outcomes and health behaviors, but medically vulnerable and underserved populations are less likely to begin prenatal care in the first trimester. In 2017, the Health Center Program provided safety-net care to more than 27 million persons, including 573 026 prenatal patients, at approximately 12 000 sites across the United States and U.S. jurisdictions. As part of a mandatory reporting requirement, health centers tracked whether patients initiated prenatal care in their first trimester of pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: To identify health center characteristics associated with the initiation of prenatal care in the first trimester, as well as actionable steps policymakers, providers, and health centers can take to promote early initiation of prenatal care. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from the 2017 Uniform Data System. SETTING: The United States and 8 U.S. jurisdictions. PARTICIPANTS: Health center grantees with prenatal patients (n = 1281). MEASUREMENTS: Multinomial logistic regression (adjusted for state or jurisdiction clustering) was used to identify health center characteristics associated with achievement of the Healthy People 2020 baseline (77.1%) and target (84.8%) for women receiving prenatal care in the first trimester (Maternal, Infant, and Child Health Objective 10.1). RESULTS: Overall, 57.4% of health centers met the Healthy People 2020 baseline (mean, 78%; median, 81%), and 37.9% met the Healthy People 2020 target. Several characteristics were positively associated with meeting the baseline (larger proportion of prenatal patients aged 20 to 24 years) and target (more total patients, prenatal care by referral only, a larger proportion of prenatal patients aged 25 to 44 or ≥45 years, and a larger proportion of White or privately insured patients). Other characteristics were negatively associated with the baseline (location outside New England, location in a rural area, and a large proportion of prenatal patients aged <15 years) and target (more prenatal patients, location outside New England, provision of prenatal care to women living with HIV, and more uninsured patients or patients eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid). LIMITATION: The data set is at the health center grantee level and does not contain information on timing or quality of follow-up prenatal care. CONCLUSION: Most health centers met the Healthy People 2020 baseline, but opportunities for improvement remain and the Healthy People 2020 target is still a challenge for many health centers. Policymakers, providers, and health centers can learn from high-achieving centers to promote early initiation of prenatal care among medically vulnerable and underserved populations. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Health Resources and Services Administration.
Asunto(s)
Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , United States Health Resources and Services Administration , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Embarazo , Trimestres del Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , United States Health Resources and Services Administration/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The United States is in the midst of an unprecedented opioid crisis with increasing injection drug use (IDU)-related human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) outbreaks, particularly in rural areas. The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)'s Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (RWHAP) is well positioned to integrate treatment for IDU-associated HIV infections with treatment for drug use disorders. These activities will be crucial for the "Ending the HIV Epidemic: A Plan for America" (EHE) initiative, in which 7 southern states were identified with rural HIV epidemics. METHODS: The RWHAP Services Report data were used to assess the IDU population and substance use services utilization among RWHAP clients in 2017, nationally and in the 7 EHE-identified states. THe HRSA held a 1-day Technical Expert Panel (TEP) to explore how RWHAP can best respond to the growing opioid crisis. RESULTS: During the TEP, 8 key themes emerged and 11 best practices were identified to address opioid use disorder (OUD) among people with HIV. In 2017, among RWHAP clients with reported age and transmission category, 6.7% (31 683) had HIV attributed to IDU; among IDU clients, 6.3% (1988) accessed substance use services. CONCLUSIONS: The TEP results and RWHAP data were used to develop implementation science projects that focus on addressing OUD and integrating behavioral health in primary care. These activities are critical to ending the HIV epidemic.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Epidemia de Opioides/prevención & control , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/epidemiología , United States Health Resources and Services Administration/organización & administración , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Consumidores de Drogas/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/transmisión , Implementación de Plan de Salud/organización & administración , Implementación de Plan de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Ciencia de la Implementación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/complicaciones , Autoinforme/estadística & datos numéricos , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/complicaciones , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Health Resources and Services Administration/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Health Resources and Services Administration's (HRSA), HIV/AIDS Bureau (HAB) is responsible for leading the nation's efforts to provide health care, medications, and support services to low-income people living with HIV through the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (RWHAP). The RWHAP funds and coordinates with cities, states, and local community-based organizations to deliver efficient and effective HIV care, treatment, and support services for over half a million vulnerable people living with HIV (PLWH) and their families in the United States. The annual RWHAP Services Report (RSR) is an important source of information for monitoring RWHAP's progress towards National HIV/AIDS Strategy goals. Since 2010, HRSA HAB has used the annual client-level RSR data to monitor program-related outcomes, conduct program evaluations, understand service provision, and conduct extensive analysis on disparities in viral suppression and retention in HIV care. HRSA HAB receives annual RSR submissions from RWHAP recipients and sub-recipients. However, the de-identified nature of the data limits HRSA HAB's ability to expand beyond year-to-year analyses and conduct additional analyses to evaluate outcomes for clients who are seen in multiple years. The current paper describes the development and validation of a method to link RSR client-level records across multiple data years. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Using seven RSR reporting years of data (2010 to 2016), we applied a Fellegi-Sunter (F-S) linkage model that used client demographic characteristics and their providers' geographic locations to calculate matching weights for each record pair based on estimated agreement and disagreement conditional probabilities across RSR years. To validate our methodology, we conducted an internal sample review and external validation to assess the level of accuracy of the linkage, and the extent to which the linked data set corresponds accurately to clinical records of individual clients. The linkage result yielded 70 to 80 percent year-to-year client carry-over rate over seven years of the RSR data; 96 percent linkage ratio from the internal sample review and 79.9 to 94.2 percent of provider network client carry- over rate per year from the external validation. CONCLUSIONS: This methodology addresses a gap in data analysis capabilities by allowing HRSA HAB to link RWHAP clients across reporting years. Despite weak identifying information and lack of continuity of service reporting, the longitudinal linkage improves HRSA HAB's ability to evaluate the patterns of viral suppression and monitor service utilization over time for individuals who receive services in multiple years. These analyses will support future analytic activities in understanding the impact and outcomes of the RWHAP, and will assist HRSA HAB in monitoring progress toward meeting National HIV/AIDS Strategy goals. For those looking for ways to assess health services data, the F-S unsupervised method combining weak identifying attributes and geographic proximity offers practical solutions to the problem of linking de-identified information about individuals across multiple years and improving longitudinal research.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Atención a la Salud/normas , Infecciones por VIH/terapia , VIH/aislamiento & purificación , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , United States Health Resources and Services Administration/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/virología , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the United States, approximately one-fifth of transgender women are living with HIV-nearly one-half of Black/African American (Black) transgender women are living with HIV. Limited data are available on HIV-related clinical indicators among transgender women. This is because of a lack of robust transgender data collection and research, especially within demographic subgroups. The objective of this study was to examine retention in care and viral suppression among transgender women accessing the Health Resources and Services Administration's (HRSA) Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (RWHAP)-supported HIV care, compared with cisgender women and cisgender men. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We assessed the association between gender (cisgender or transgender) and (1) retention in care and (2) viral suppression using 2016 client-level RWHAP Services Report data. Multivariable modified Poisson regression models adjusting for confounding by age, race, health care coverage, housing, and poverty level, overall and stratified by race/ethnicity, were used to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In 2016, the RWHAP served 6,534 transgender women (79.8% retained in care, 79.0% virally suppressed), 143,173 cisgender women (83.7% retained in care, 84.0% virally suppressed), and 382,591 cisgender men (81.0% retained in care, 85.9% virally suppressed). Black transgender women were less likely to be retained in care than Black cisgender women (aPR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.97, p < 0.001). Black transgender women were also less likely to reach viral suppression than Black cisgender women (aPR: 0.55, 95%I CI: 0.41-0.73, p < 0.001) and Black cisgender men (aPR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.42-0.73, p < 0.001). A limitation of the study is that RWHAP data are collected for administrative, not research, purposes, and clinical outcome measures, including retention and viral suppression, are only reported to the RWHAP for the approximately 60% of RWHAP clients engaged in RWHAP-supported outpatient medical care. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed disparities in HIV clinical outcomes among Black transgender women. These results fill an important gap in national HIV data about transgender people with HIV. Reducing barriers to HIV medical care for transgender women is critical to decrease disparities among this population.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/fisiopatología , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Personas Transgénero/estadística & datos numéricos , United States Health Resources and Services Administration/estadística & datos numéricos , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/complicaciones , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Femenino , VIH/patogenicidad , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: People living with HIV (PLWH) residing in rural areas experience substantial barriers to HIV care, which may contribute to poor HIV health outcomes, including retention in HIV care and viral suppression. The Health Resources and Services Administration's Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (HRSA RWHAP) is an important source of HIV medical care and support services in rural areas. The purpose of this analysis was to (1) assess the reach of the RWHAP in rural areas of the United States, (2) compare the characteristics and funded services of RWHAP provider organizations in rural and non-rural areas, and (3) compare the characteristics and clinical outcomes of RWHAP clients accessing medical care and support services in rural and non-rural areas. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Data for this analysis were abstracted from the 2017 RWHAP Services Report (RSR), the primary source of annual, client-level RWHAP data. Organizations funded to deliver RWHAP any service ("RWHAP providers") were categorized as rural or non-rural according to the HRSA FORHP's definition of modified Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes. RWHAP clients were categorized based on their patterns of RWHAP service use as "visited only rural providers," "visited only non-rural providers," or "visited rural and non-rural providers." In 2017, among the 2,113 providers funded by the RWHAP, 6.2% (n = 132) were located in HRSA-designated rural areas. Rural providers were funded to deliver a greater number of service categories per site than non-rural providers (44.7% funded for ≥5 services vs. 34.1% funded for ≥5 services, respectively). Providers in rural areas served fewer clients than providers in non-rural areas; 47.3% of RWHAP providers in rural areas served 1-99 clients, while 29.6% of non-rural providers served 1-99 clients. Retention in care and viral suppression outcomes did not differ on the basis of whether a client accessed services from rural or non-rural providers. CONCLUSIONS: RWHAP providers are a crucial component of HIV care delivery in the rural United States despite evidence of significant barriers to engagement in care for rural PLWH, RWHAP clients who visited rural providers were just as likely to be retained in care and reach viral suppression as their counterparts who visited non-rural providers. The RWHAP, especially in partnership with Rural Health Clinics and federally funded Health Centers, has the infrastructure and expertise necessary to address the HIV epidemic in rural America.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/normas , Infecciones por VIH/terapia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , United States Health Resources and Services Administration/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Administración Financiera , Geografía , VIH/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/economía , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/organización & administración , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/normas , Características de la Residencia , Servicios de Salud Rural/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Rural/normas , Personas Transgénero , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Health Resources and Services Administration/organización & administración , United States Health Resources and Services Administration/normas , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The rising prevalence of mental health conditions and substance use disorders (MH/SUD) underscores the important role of health centers (HCs) in caring for low-income and uninsured MH/SUD patients. This study used the 2014 Health Center Patient Survey and 2014 Uniform Data System to determine the independent association between delivery of MH/SUD integration and related interventions to patients that reported a MH/SUD condition (n=2714) with the number of HC visits, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations last year. Results showed that health education was associated with fewer predicted ED visits (1.8 vs. 2.3) and lower likelihood of hospitalizations (16% vs. 24%) among MH patients. Medical enabling services was associated with lower rates of ED visits (0.3 vs.1.9) and hospitalizations (< 1% vs. 13%) among SUD patients. The results indicate the utility of integration and related intervention services in primary care settings to improve service use and reduce ED and hospitalization among MH/SUD patients.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Pobreza/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/estadística & datos numéricos , United States Health Resources and Services Administration/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Mental , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Evidence indicates the unmet need for primary care services including medical, mental health, and dental care is greater among uninsured and Medicaid beneficiaries than privately insured individuals, many of whom use Health Resources and Services Administration-funded health centers (HRSA HCs). OBJECTIVE: We examined differences in rates of unmet need between low-income uninsured and Medicaid patients of HRSA HCs and safety-net clinics in general or private physicians. RESEARCH DESIGN: We used logistic regression models to compare the predicted probabilities of unmet need for uninsured and Medicaid individuals whose usual source of care is HRSA HCs versus clinics in general or private physicians. SAMPLE: We used a nationally representative survey of low income, adult patients who identified HRSA HCs as their usual source of care. We used the National Health Interview Survey to independently identify low-income individuals whose usual source of care was clinics (National Health Interview Survey clinics) or physicians (National Health Interview Survey physicians) in the general population. MEASURES: Dependent variables were unmet need and delay in medical care, and unmet need for prescription medications, mental health, and dental care. The primary independent variable of interest was the usual source of care. We controlled for potential confounders. RESULTS: We found the probability of unmet need for medical and dental care to be lower among HRSA HC patients than individuals whose usual source of care were not HRSA HCs. CONCLUSIONS: HRSA HC patients have lower probabilities of unmet need for medical and dental care. This is likely because HRSA HCs provide accessible, affordable, and comprehensive primary care services. Expanding capacity of these organizations will help reduce unmet need and its consequences.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Pobreza/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/estadística & datos numéricos , United States Health Resources and Services Administration/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Atención Odontológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Sexuales , Factores Socioeconómicos , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
With the U.S. health care system in the midst of a major transition spurred on by the Affordable Care Act (ACA), there is renewed debate over key health workforce policy issues. Health insurance coverage is expanding under the ACA, which will likely lead to increased demand for health care services. Longer-term, there will be increased emphasis on value, efficiency, and accountability within the health care system. These developments have major implications for the health care workforce. One key issue is whether the U.S. will face health care provider shortages as health insurance coverage expands and several health care occupations experience aging and other demographic transitions. Another key issue is how the move away from fee-for-service payment to more value-or outcome-based reimbursement models could potentially change the role of--and, therefore, demand for--different types of providers within the health care delivery team.
Asunto(s)
Odontólogos/provisión & distribución , United States Health Resources and Services Administration/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Niño , Atención Odontológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Odontólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Política de Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Beneficios del Seguro , Cobertura del Seguro , Medicaid , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Pobreza , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Catéteres de Permanencia/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Unidades Hospitalarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Sangre/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/microbiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Health Resources and Services Administration/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The recent Health Resources and Services Administration report on critical care manpower details the impending crisis in the critical care workforce in the United States. DESIGN: A review of the Health Resources and Services Administration statistics indicate the present structure for training critical care physicians through combined pulmonary/critical care fellowships is, and will remain, woefully inadequate to meet demand. INTERVENTION: Training for intensive care unit physicians will require new paradigms for training, including consideration of free-standing critical care residencies and multidisciplinary critical care fellowships. CONCLUSION: Unless the training structure changes, the worsening shortage of intensivists will precipitate a crisis, resulting in the disintegration of critical care delivery in the United States.