Efficacy of BCG for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer following nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of intravesical (IVe) Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) to treat non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) recurrences in patients who have previously undergone nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS: We performed a single institution retrospective review of patients who underwent nephroureterectomy for UTUC from 2009 to 2021. Patients who subsequently developed NMIBC treated with transurethral resection followed by IVe BCG were included in the study group. A control cohort was formed by retrospective review of patents with primary NMIBC treated with BCG during the same period. Patients in the control cohort were matched by stage of bladder cancer at a 2:1 ratio of control to study subjects. Demographic data, pathology of bladder tumors prior to and following BCG, use of maintenance BCG (mBCG), time to recurrence, time to progression, progression to cystectomy, and progression to metastatic disease were collected on all patients. Descriptive statistics were utilized to compare the 2 groups. The primary outcome was progression to muscle invasive disease. Secondary outcomes included intravesical recurrence free survival, disease free survival, and progression to metastatic disease. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to elucidate independent variables associated with bladder tumor recurrence. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to assess the impact of prior UTUC on time to bladder tumor recurrence. RESULTS: One-hundred and ninety-one patients underwent nephroureterectomy at our institution from 2009 to 2021 for UTUC. Twenty-five patients were identified to have subsequently developed NMIBC recurrences treated with inductions BCG. The control group was comprised of 50 patients with primary NMIBC matched by stage of bladder cancer for which BCG was indicated in the study group. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up was significantly longer in the control group relative to the study group (64.8 [50.1-85.6] vs 25 months [17-35]; P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in demographics between the study and control groups. The rate of progression to muscle invasive disease was 17% vs 0% in the study group and control group respectively (P = 0.0521). History of UTUC was associated with increased risk of intravesical bladder tumor recurrence post BCG on multivariable analysis (HR 2.5; P = 0.017) and Kaplan Meier survival analysis (P = 0.039). The mean time to bladder tumor recurrence after treatment with BCG was significantly worse in the study group at (7.9 vs. 23.9 months; P = 0.0322). Similarly, the rate of progression to metastatic disease was worse in the study group (24% vs 2%; P = 0.0047). Overall disease-free survival was also noted to be significantly worse on Kaplan Meier survival analysis in the study group (P = 0.0074). No statistically significant differences in the stage grade of bladder tumor recurrence, grade of bladder tumor recurrence, or rate of progression to cystectomy were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests reduced efficacy of BCG for NMIBC in patients with a history of UTUC. Patients in this population should be counseled accordingly. Research into alternative treatments for bladder tumor recurrence and more aggressive prophylactic regimens after nephroureterectomy for prevention of bladder tumor recurrence in this population is encouraged.

The role of histological subtype and chemotherapy on prognosis of ureteral cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To date, there have been few studies examining the prognostic implications of histological subtypes in ureteral cancer. And chemotherapy plays a crucial role in the treatment of ureteral cancer, while many factors influence the efficacy of chemotherapy. This study aimed to utilize the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database to assess the impact of histological type on ureteral cancer prognostic outcomes and discovered how histological type and T-stage influence the efficacy of chemotherapy. METHODS: Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, we reviewed 8915 records of patients with primary ureteral cancer from 18 centers between 2000 and 2018. We focused on the overall survival and cancer-specific survival of the records and used Kaplan‒Meier method to calculate survival curves. RESULTS: In the comparison of prognostic outcomes, atypical subtypes exhibited a less favorable prognosis compared to typical ureteral carcinoma. Notably, patients diagnosed with papillary urothelial carcinoma demonstrated the most favorable overall survival (p = 0.005). Statistically significant benefits were observed in the prognosis of patients with non-papillary urothelial carcinoma who received chemotherapy (HR = 0.860, 95% CI 0.764-0.966, p = 0.011), while chemotherapy did not yield a statistically significant effect on the prognosis of patients with papillary urothelial carcinoma (HR = 1.055, 95% CI 0.906-1.228, p = 0.493). Chemotherapy had an adverse impact on the prognosis of patients with T1 ureteral cancer (HR = 1.235, 95% CI 1.016-1.502, p = 0.034), whereas it exhibited a positive prognostic effect for T3/T4 cases (HR = 0.739, 95% CI 0.654-0.835, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Histological type affects the prognosis of ureteral cancer. And evaluation of cancer histological type and T stage in ureteral cancer patients prior to chemotherapy is mandatory.

Phase 1b Trial Evaluating Tolerability and Activity of Targeted Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition in Localized Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We initiated a biomarker-informed preoperative study of infigratinib, a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor, in patients with localized upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a population with high unmet needs and tumor with a high frequency of FGFR3 alterations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with localized UTUC undergoing ureteroscopy or nephroureterectomy/ureterectomy were enrolled on a phase 1b trial (NCT04228042). Once-daily infigratinib 125 mg by mouth × 21 days (28-day cycle) was given for 2 cycles. Tolerability was monitored by Bayesian design and predefined stopping boundaries. The primary endpoint was tolerability, and the secondary endpoint was objective response based on tumor mapping, done after endoscopic biopsy and post-trial surgery. Total planned enrollment: 20 patients. Targeted sequencing performed using a NovaSeq 6000 solid tumor panel. RESULTS: From May 2021 to November 2022, 14 patients were enrolled, at which point the trial was closed due to termination of all infigratinib oncology trials. Two patients (14.3%) had treatment-terminating toxicities, well below the stopping threshold. Responses occurred in 6 (66.7%) of 9 patients with FGFR3 alterations. Responders had median tumor size reduction of 67%, with 3 of 5 patients initially planned for nephroureterectomy/ureterectomy converted to ureteroscopy. Median follow-up in responders was 24.7 months (14.9-28.9). CONCLUSIONS: In this first trial of targeted therapy for localized UTUC, FGFR inhibition was well tolerated and had significant activity in FGFR3 altered tumors. Renal preservation was enabled in a substantial proportion of participants. These data support the design of a biomarker-driven phase 2 trial of FGFR3 inhibition in this population with significant unmet clinical needs.

Testing the external validity of the POUT III trial (adjuvant platnium-based chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma) in a North American cohort.

OBJECTIVE: The European POUT III randomized controlled trial provided level-one evidence that adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard of care following nephroureterectomy (RNU) for locally invasive or node-positive upper tract urothelial carcinoma. We aim to assess this European randomized controlled trial's generalizability (external validity) to a North American cohort, using a nationwide database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To compare trial patients with those seen in real-world practice, we simulated the trial inclusion criteria using data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). We identified patients with histologically confirmed transitional cell carcinoma who underwent RNU. The available demographic characteristics of the NCDB cohort were compared with the POUT III trial cohort using Chi-squared test. RESULTS: The NCDB cohort (n = 3,380) had a significantly higher proportion of older patients (age ≥ 80: 23.5% vs. 5%), and more males (68% vs. 56.2%) than the POUT cohort (Table 1, both p < 0.001). Additionally, the rate of advanced nodal disease was higher in the NCDB (N1 9.6%, N2 9.3%) than in the POUT (N1 6%, N2 3%) cohort (p < 0.001). A more extensive lymph node dissection was performed in NCDB vs. POUT patients (node≥10 10.9% vs. 3%, p < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis removing all subjects with a Charlson Comorbidity Index > 0 did not change the significance of any results. CONCLUSIONS: While the primary disease stage was similar, the rate of advanced nodal disease was significantly higher in NCDB, which might be explained partially by the more extensive lymph node dissection performed in the latter. These differences warrant caution when applying the POUT III findings to North American patients.

Improved Disease-Free Survival With Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: Final Results of the POUT Trial.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.POUT was a phase III, randomized, open-label trial, including 261 patients with muscle-invasive or lymph node-positive, nonmetastatic upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) randomly assigned after radical nephroureterectomy to platinum-based chemotherapy (132) or surveillance (129). Primary outcome analysis demonstrated that chemotherapy improved disease-free survival (DFS). At that time, the planned secondary outcome analysis of overall survival (OS) was immature. By February 2022, 50 and 67 DFS events had occurred in the chemotherapy and surveillance groups, respectively, at a median follow-up of 65 months. The 5-year DFS was 62% versus 45%, univariable hazard ratio (HR), 0.55 (95% CI, 0.38 to 0.80, P = .001). The restricted mean survival time (RMST) was 18 months longer (95% CI, 6 to 30) in the chemotherapy arm. There were 46 and 60 deaths in the chemotherapy and control arms, respectively. The 5-year OS was 66% versus 57%, with univariable HR, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.46 to 1.00, P = .049) and RMST difference 11 months (95% CI, 1 to 21). Treatment effects were consistent across chemotherapy regimens (carboplatin or cisplatin) and disease stage. Toxicities were similar to those previously reported, and there were no clinically relevant differences in quality of life between arms. In summary, although OS was not the primary outcome measure, the updated results add further support for the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with UTUC, suggesting long-term benefits.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Real-World, Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), administered following radical nephroureterectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with UTUC, arising from renal pelvis or ureter, staged pT3/T4 or N+ were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery. The chemotherapy consisted of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on day 1. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for up to 4 cycles. Endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and safety. RESULTS: Among 89 eligible patients, 85 (95.5%) completed at least 3 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was well tolerated, the main toxicities being mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal toxic effects and pruritus. With a median follow-up of 37 months, median DFS was 30 months (95% confidence interval, 22 to 39), and the median MFS was not reached. The 3-year DFS and MFS were 44% and 56%, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that the main factor associated with DFS and MFS was the lymph node involvement, whereas age, T category, grade, or the primary site of UTUC were not significantly associated with DFS or MFS. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy after radical surgery of pT3/T4 or N+ UTUC was feasible and may demonstrate benefits in DFS and MFS. Whether novel agents added to the chemotherapy regimen, as a concurrent combination or maintenance, impacts on survival or reduces the development of metastases remains to be studied.

Single Early Intravesical Instillation of Epirubicin for Preventing Bladder Recurrence after Nephroureterectomy in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of early single intravesical administration of epirubicin in preventing intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma who underwent radical nephroureterectomy between November 2018 and May 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Intravesical epirubicin was administered within 48 hours if no evidence of leakage was observed. Epirubicin (50 mg) in 50 mL normal saline solution was introduced into the bladder via a catheter and maintained for 60 minutes. The severity of adverse events was graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. We compared intravesical recurrence rate between the two groups. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify the independent predictors of bladder recurrence following radical nephroureterectomy. RESULTS: Epirubicin (n=55) and control (n=116) groups were included in the analysis. No grade 1 or higher bladder symptoms have been reported. A statistically significant difference in the intravesical recurrence rate was observed between the two groups (11.8% at 1 year in the epirubicin group vs. 28.4% at 1 year in the control group; log-rank p=0.039). In multivariate analysis, epirubicin instillation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20 to 0.93; p=0.033) and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.65; p=0.003) were independently predictive of a reduced incidence of bladder recurrence. CONCLUSION: This retrospective review revealed that a single immediate intravesical instillation of epirubicin is safe and can reduce the incidence of intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy. However, further prospective trials are required to confirm these findings.

Safety and efficacy of radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy for recurrent metastatic renal pelvic and ureteral carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively investigate the safety and efficacy of radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy for recurrent metastatic renal pelvic and ureteral carcinoma. METHODS: 109 patients were enrolled in this study, including 44 patients in the radiochemotherapy group and 65 patients in the chemotherapy group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics of the two groups by 1:1 matching. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate PFS and OS. Cox regression model was used for multivariate analysis. The side effects were evaluated by CTCAE v5.0 RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 14.5 months. Multivariate analysis showed that radiotherapy was a good independent prognostic factor for OS (HR: 0.327, 95% CI 0.157-0.680, P = 0.003). After matching, there were 40 patients in both groups, and the median PFS and OS in the radiochemotherapy group were longer than those in the chemotherapy group (PFS: 10.4 vs. 6.7 months, P = 0.035; OS: 43.5 vs. 18.8 months, P < 0.001). In addition, in the radiochemotherapy group, patients treated with radiotherapy before first-line chemotherapy failure had a longer PFS than those treated with radiotherapy after chemotherapy failure (median PFS: 15.7 vs. 6 months, P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities between the two groups (52.3% vs. 50.8%, P = 0.878). CONCLUSION: For patients with recurrent metastatic renal pelvic and ureteral carcinoma, radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy is well tolerable and expected to bring long-term survival benefits, and the benefits of early interventional radiotherapy may be more obvious.

Sequential endoluminal gemcitabine and docetaxel for the treatment of clinically non-invasive high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

PURPOSE: There is an unmet need for effective renal sparing treatments for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Gemcitabine/Docetaxel (Gem/Doce) has shown favorable efficacy in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. We report the outcomes of patients treated with endoluminal Gem/Doce for noninvasive high-grade UTUC. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients treated with Gem/Doce for clinically noninvasive high-grade UTUC with no radiographic or endoscopically visible disease, either at diagnosis or following ablation, was performed. Treatment was instilled via nephrostomy or retrograde ureteral catheter. Induction instillations were performed weekly for 6 weeks, followed by 6 monthly instillations if disease-free. Recurrence was defined as biopsy-proven disease or high-grade (HG) cytology. Progression was defined by development of muscle invasion, metastases, or death due to cancer. Survival was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The final cohort included 31 patients with 41 upper tract units, 51% of which would have been dialysis dependent with nephroureterectomy. Median (IQR) age was 74 years (68-81). Median follow-up was 29 months (IQR 20-58). Prior to treatment, 37 (90%) units presented with a localizing HG cytology (presumed occult CIS), and 4 (9.8%) with HG biopsy-proven disease. Sixteen (52%) patients reported any side effects; 5 were Grade 3 and 1 was Grade 5. Recurrence-free survival was 76%, 54%, and 40% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Five patients died from urothelial carcinoma. The 3-year progression-free and overall survival were 75% and 75%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Gem/Doce demonstrates promising safety and efficacy as a renal-sparing treatment option for high-grade UTUC in appropriately selected patients.

Design and rationale of a single-arm phase II study of neoadjuvant Durvalumab and Gemcitabine associated with Cisplatin or Carboplatin for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: the iNDUCT trial (NCT04617756).

BACKGROUND: Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is often locally advanced at initial diagnosis and is associated with high recurrence and mortality rates after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy has shown a recurrence-free survival benefit in a randomised phase III trial, while neoadjuvant treatment seems promising in retrospective series. On the contrary, little is known about the role of perioperative immunotherapy and its combination with chemotherapy for UTUC patients, although initial positive results have been published for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. STUDY DESIGN AND ENDPOINTS: Against this backdrop, we are running a multi-centre single-arm phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant Durvalumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death ligand 1, combined with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin or Carboplatin for high-risk UTUC patients. The primary outcome is pathological complete response rate at RNU. Secondary endpoints include the partial pathological response rate, safety, as well as disease-free and overall survival. A biomarker analysis is also planned. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Included patients must have a good performance status and harbour a non-metastatic UTUC, considered at high risk of progression, defined as either biopsy-proven high-grade disease or invasive features at imaging with or, more recently, without high-grade cytology at the multidisciplinary team discretion, as specified in the latest amendment. Enrolled patients receive 3 cycles of neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy before RNU, and the standard of care thereafter. The trial is registered as NCT04617756 and is supervised by an independent data monitoring committee.

Successful Kidney-Sparing Systemic Therapy for a High-Risk Ureteral Carcinoma Case.

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) refers to the malignancies located from renal calices toward the end of the ureter and could be classified as renal pelvis carcinoma and ureteral carcinoma. For high-risk UTUC cases with a normal contralateral kidney, radical nephroureterectomy is the standard treatment. As for low-risk UTUC cases or solitary kidney cases, kidney-sparing therapy may be a better choice. Besides, to prevent postoperative recurrence, systemic therapy should be applied, though the investigation is still ongoing. In this case report, we reported a rare case diagnosed with high-risk ureteral carcinoma, but he underwent kidney-sparing therapy due to chronic kidney disease. Recurrence has occurred after segmental ureterectomy. But through the utilization of ablation, bladder instillation, and tislelizumab, endoscopy and CT were normal in the follow-up (the patient refused to take washings from the upper urinary tract) for more than a year. In all, the utilization of ureteroscopic retrograde tumor ablation, BCG bladder instillation, and tislelizumab injection to treat high-risk ureteral carcinoma for kidney-sparing therapy have filled in the gap in this field, which should be promoted to help more patients in similar situations.

Comparison of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma in real-world practice: a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma compared with surgery alone. However, no clinical trial has established the superiority of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of perioperative outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis encompassing 164 upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy and received perioperative chemotherapy. Of these patients, 65 (39.6%) and 99 (60.4%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy, respectively. Recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival were computed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Additionally, we conducted Cox regression analyses to evaluate the risk factors for recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: Pathological downstaging was seen in 37% of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group. However, no pathological complete response was observed in this cohort. The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated significantly lower recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited a marked association with inferior recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival. CONCLUSION: Our study has suggested that neoadjuvant chemotherapy would be more effective in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients compared with adjuvant chemotherapy.

Postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who underwent kidney-sparing surgery (KSS): a single-center study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who underwent kidney-sparing surgery (KSS). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 31 patients with primary UTUC who underwent kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) and who were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy at our center between October 1998 and May 2017. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 23.0. The primary endpoints of this study included overall survival (OS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS); the secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and treatment-related toxicity. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 58.4 months (range, 12.7-185.3 months), and the median local recurrence time was 59.0 months (range, 7.0-185 months). All of the patients completed radiotherapy on schedule, and no grade 3-4 late-stage reaction was observed. The estimated 5-year and 10-year OS, DFS and LRFS rates of the patients were 64.0%, 61.1%, 69.6% and 48.0%, 40.9%, 64.6%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that age (χ2 = 4.224, P = 0.040), R0 resection (χ2 = 3.949, P = 0.047), and early stage (I + II) (χ2 = 6.515, P = 0.011) were associated with good OS; DFS benefit in early stage patients (χ2 = 6.151, P = 0.013) and age<70 years old (χ2 = 5.091, P = 0.024). Patients with distal ureteral segments had better LRFS than patients with proximal ureteral cancer (χ2 = 5.248, P = 0.022). However, multivariate analysis showed that age was the only factor of OS (χ2 = 4.099, P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant radiotherapy is safe and tolerated, and LRFS was superior in middle and distal ureteral cancer than in proximal ureteral cancer.

[Preoperative chemotherapy for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Impact on renal function]. / Chimiothérapie préopératoire des tumeurs des voies excrétrices supérieures : impact sur la fonction rénale.

PURPOSE: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) are rare tumors with a poor prognosis. The standard treatment for localized disease is based on total nephroureterectomy (NUT) followed by platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy for eligible patients at risk of recurrence. However, many patients have renal failure after surgery preventing chemotherapy. Thus, the place of preoperative chemotherapy (POC) is questioned with little information available about renal toxicity and efficacity. METHODS: A single center retrospective study was performed on patients with UTUC who received POC. RESULTS: In all, 24 patients with localized UTUC were treated with POC between 2013 and 2022. Twenty-one (91%) had secondarily NUT. In this cohort, POC did not result in degradation of median renal function (pre-POC median GFR: 70mL/min, post-POC median GFR: 77mL/min, P=0.79), unlike NUT (post-NUT median GFR: 51.5mL/min, P<0.001). In addition, the rate of complete pathological response to pathological examination was 29%. After a median follow-up of 27.4 months, the overall survival rate was 74% and the recurrence-free survival rate was 46%. CONCLUSION: POC for UTUC shows a very reassuring renal toxicity profile and encouraging histological results. These data encourage prospective studies assessing its place for UTUC management.

Intracavitary Chemotherapy after kidney-Sparing Therapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: Intracavitary chemotherapy is one of the current treatment options for kidney-sparing treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of intracavitary perfusion. METHODS: We carefully selected publications for study from four databases (Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus) up to January 2023. The R 4.0.4 software was used to calculate the pooled ratio and its 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The I2 score was used to test heterogeneity, and the funnel plot was used to estimate the publication bias. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies with a total of 788 patients were included in this study. The overall survival at a median follow-up of 26.3 months was 87.2% (95% CI 0.80-0.93). The cancer-specific survival at a median follow-up of 30 months was 94.1% (95% CI 0.89-0.98). At a median follow-up of 30 months, the recurrence rate of UTUC was 27.5% (95% CI 0.21-0.34). By subgroup analysis, we found that the recurrence rate in patients with T1 / Ta stage was 35.1% and CIS stage 29.0%. The recurrence rates of BCG, Mitomycin C, and Mitomycin Gel (UGN101) were 31.2%, 41.3% and 12.9%, respectively. The recurrence rates for anterograde and retrograde perfusion were 28.5% and 21.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: With the advent of new drugs, including UGN101, patients with UTUC have a better prognosis. Therefore, kidney preservation therapy for patients with UTUC would be promising.

The efficacy and timing of adjuvant chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: A recovery period between surgery and initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is common in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), which can progress after a relatively long time. Therefore, the efficacy of AC initiated within 90 days after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) was evaluated in UTUC patients at stage ≥pT2 (N0-3M0), in addition to the effect of delayed AC initiation on survival outcomes. METHODS: Clinical data for 428 UTUC patients diagnosed with transitional cell carcinoma with postoperatively confirmed pathological stages, muscle-invasive or greater-stage (pT2-4) disease, any nodal status, and metastasis-free (M0) disease were retrospectively analyzed. All patients who received AC were treated within 90 days after RNU and underwent at least 4 cycles of the AC procedure. Then, patients receiving AC were divided into the "within 45 days" and "45 to 90 days" groups according to the time interval between RNU and AC initiation. Their clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated and the survival outcomes of the 2 groups were compared. Any adverse events that occurred during the AC process were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 428 patients were analyzed in the study, including 132 individuals who underwent the AC procedure with platinum in combination with gemcitabine within 90 days after RNU and 296 patients who failed to initiate AC within 90 days. The median age of all patients was 68 years (mean 67, range 28-90 years), and the median follow-up was 25 months (mean 36, range 1-129 months). There were no significant differences in age, sex, lymph node metastasis, tumor location, hydronephrosis status, hematuria status, cancer grade, or multifocality between the 2 groups. Individuals undergoing AC initiated within 90 days of RNU showed a significantly decreased mortality relative to those patients who did not receive AC. Shorter intervals between RNU and AC initiation within 45 days vs. 45-90 days did not improve patient OS and cancer-specific survival (CSS) and may have increased the incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSION: The present study data supported the finding that a platinum-based combination with gemcitabine regimen initiated postoperatively significantly improved OS and CSS in patients with UTUC at stages ≥pT2 (N0-3M0). Furthermore, no survival benefit was evident in patients who started AC within 45 days after RNU compared to those who received AC within 45 to 90 days.

Promising Response of Paclitaxel in Metastatic Transitional Cell Carcinoma of Distal Ureter Complicated with Hydroureteronephrosis: A Case Report.

Ureteric carcinoma is the rarest of all urothelial malignancies, and little attention has been given to it. Palliation in these groups of patients is a dilemma in the clinics. Use of chemotherapeutic agents in ureteric carcinoma is a double edged sword, as these patients had already impaired renal function due to post-renal failure and nephrotoxic nature of most of the chemotherapeutic agents can further deteriorate the renal function, making the management approach, a relatively visionary task. Here, we present a case of a 77-year-old female with metastatic ureteric carcinoma locally complicated with hydroureteronephrosis, coming to us with gross haematuria, lower abdominal pain along with cough. Apart from age factor of the lady, presence of hydroureteronephrosis and pulmonary metastases was another challenge for us. Paclitaxel remains the mainstay of our treatment. Keywords: carcinoma; case reports; metastasis; paclitaxel.

The ablative effect of mitomycin reverse thermal gel: Expanding the role for nephron preservation therapy in low grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Assess the real-world ablative effect of mitomycin reverse thermal gel for low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in patients who undergo biopsy only or partial ablation and evaluate utility of complete ablation prior to UGN-101. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed low-grade UTUC patients treated with UGN-101 from 15 high-volume centers. Patients were categorized based on initial endoscopic ablation (biopsy only, partial ablation, or complete ablation) and by size of remaining tumor (complete ablation, <1cm, 1-3cm, or >3cm) prior to UGN-101. The primary outcome was rendered disease free (RDF) rate at first post-UGN-101 ureteroscopy (URS), defined as complete response or partial response with minimal mechanical ablation to endoscopically clear the upper tract of visible disease. RESULTS: One hundred and sixteen patients were included for analysis after excluding those with high-grade disease. At first post-UGN-101 URS, there were no differences in RDF rates between those who at initial URS (pre-UGN-101) had complete ablation (RDF 77.0%), partial ablation (RDF 55.9%) or biopsy only (RDF 66.7%) (P = 0.14). Similarly, a complimentary analysis focusing on tumor size (completely ablated, <1cm, 1-3cm or >3cm) prior to UGN-101 induction did not demonstrate significant differences in RDF rates (P = 0.17). CONCLUSION: The results of the early real-world experience suggest that UGN-101 may play a role in initial chemo-ablative cytoreduction of larger volume low-grade tumors that may not initially appear to be amenable to renal preservation. Further studies will help to better quantify the chemo-ablative effect and to identify clinical factors for patient selection.

The role of perioperative chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy.

PURPOSE: To summarize evidence regarding the use of neoadjuvant (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) among patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE and the Cochrane library was performed to identify any original or review article on the role of perioperative chemotherapy for UTUC patients treated with RNU. RESULTS: With regards to NAC, retrospective studies consistently suggested that it may be associated with better pathological downstaging (pDS) ranging from 10.8 to 80% and complete response (pCR) ranging from 4.3 to 15%, while decreasing the risk of recurrence and death as compared to RNU alone. Even higher pDS ranging from 58 to 75% and pCR ranging from 14 to 38% were observed in single-arm phase II trials. With regards to AC, retrospective studies provided conflicting results although the largest report from the National Cancer Database suggested an overall survival benefit in pT3-T4 and/or pN + patients. In addition, a phase III randomized controlled trial showed that the use of AC was associated with a disease-free survival benefit (HR = 0.45; 95% CI = [0.30-0.68]; p = 0.0001) in pT2-T4 and/or pN + patients with acceptable toxicity profile. This benefit was consistent in all subgroups analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative chemotherapy improves oncological outcomes associated with RNU. Given the impact of RNU on renal function, the rational is stronger for the use of NAC which impacts final pathology and potentially prolongs survival. However, the level of evidence is stronger for the use of AC that has been proven to decrease the risk of recurrence after RNU with a potential survival benefit.