Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 15.110
1.
Br J Nurs ; 33(9): S10-S15, 2024 May 09.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722003

Clean intermittent self-catheterisation is a common procedure undertaken by people with bladder dysfunction. However, it is not without its complications, the main one being urinary tract infection. The most common causes of urinary tract infections are poor hygiene, technique and adherence, excessive post-void residual urine and bladder trauma. A catheter with new Micro-hole Zone Technology has been developed, which can potentially improve bladder emptying and minimise these complications. A case study is used to illustrate its effects in practice.


Self Care , Humans , Intermittent Urethral Catheterization/instrumentation , Urinary Catheterization/methods , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Equipment Design , Urinary Catheters , Female , Male
2.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 162, 2024 05 13.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38741134

BACKGROUND: The effect of the periurethral cleansing range on catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) occurrence remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of expanded periurethral cleansing for reducing CAUTI in comatose patients. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, eligible patients in our hospital were enrolled and allocated randomly to the experimental group (expanded periurethral cleansing protocol; n = 225) or the control group (usual periurethral cleansing protocol; n = 221). The incidence of CAUTI on days 3, 7, and 10 after catheter insertion were compared, and the pathogen results and influencing factors were analyzed. RESULTS: The incidences of CAUTI in the experimental and control groups on days 3, 7, and 10 were (5/225, 2.22% vs. 7/221, 3.17%, P = 0.54), (12/225, 5.33% vs. 18/221, 8.14%, P = 0.24), and (23/225, 10.22% vs. 47/221, 21.27%, P = 0.001), respectively; Escherichia coli and Candida albicans were the most common species in the two groups. The incidences of bacterial CAUTI and fungal CAUTI in the two groups were 11/225, 4.89% vs. 24/221, 10.86%, P = 0.02) and (10/225, 4.44% vs. 14/221, 6.33%, P = 0.38), respectively. The incidences of polymicrobial CAUTI in the two groups were 2/225 (0.89%) and 9/221 (4.07%), respectively (P = 0.03). The percentages of CAUTI-positive females in the two groups were 9.85% (13/132) and 29.52% (31/105), respectively (P < 0.05). The proportion of CAUTI-positive patients with diabetes in the experimental and control groups was 17.72% (14/79), which was lower than the 40.85% (29/71) in the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Expanded periurethral cleansing could reduce the incidence of CAUTI, especially those caused by bacteria and multiple pathogens, in comatose patients with short-term catheterization (≤ 10 days). Female patients and patients with diabetes benefit more from the expanded periurethral cleansing protocol for reducing CAUTI.


Catheter-Related Infections , Coma , Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , Female , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Catheterization/methods , Urethra
3.
J Korean Med Sci ; 39(18): e151, 2024 May 13.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38742291

BACKGROUND: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) account for a large proportion of healthcare-associated infections and have a significant impact on morbidity, length of hospital stay, and mortality. Adherence to the recommended infection prevention practices can effectively reduce the incidence of CAUTIs. This study aimed to assess the characteristics of CAUTIs and the efficacy of prevention programs across hospitals of various sizes. METHODS: Intervention programs, including training, surveillance, and monitoring, were implemented. Data on the microorganisms responsible for CAUTIs, urinary catheter utilization ratio, rate of CAUTIs per 1,000 device days, and factors associated with the use of indwelling catheters were collected from 2017 to 2019. The incidence of CAUTIs and associated data were compared between university hospitals and small- and medium-sized hospitals. RESULTS: Thirty-two hospitals participated in the study, including 21 university hospitals and 11 small- and medium-sized hospitals. The microorganisms responsible for CAUTIs and their resistance rates did not differ between the two groups. In the first quarter of 2018, the incidence rate was 2.05 infections/1,000 device-days in university hospitals and 1.44 infections/1,000 device-days in small- and medium-sized hospitals. After implementing interventions, the rate gradually decreased in the first quarter of 2019, with 1.18 infections/1,000 device-days in university hospitals and 0.79 infections/1,000 device-days in small- and medium-sized hospitals. However, by the end of the study, the infection rate increased to 1.74 infections/1,000 device-days in university hospitals and 1.80 infections/1,000 device-days in small- and medium-sized hospitals. CONCLUSION: We implemented interventions to prevent CAUTIs and evaluated their outcomes. The incidence of these infections decreased in the initial phases of the intervention when adequate support and personnel were present. The rate of these infections may be reduced by implementing active interventions such as consistent monitoring and adherence to guidelines for preventing infections.


Catheter-Related Infections , Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Incidence , Infection Control/methods , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Hospitals, University , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects
4.
Br J Community Nurs ; 29(Sup5): S38-S40, 2024 May 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728167

Urinary leakage is prevalent in men. To contain and manage this leakage, men are often advised about urinary devices. However, sometimes this advice does not include penile sheaths. Penile sheaths are a good way of managing urinary leakage if an individual is suitable for sheaths. This article will explore this suitability, advantages to using a sheath, reasons why sheaths may not be suitable, and will discuss optimum fitting to ensure the sheath is a secure drainage device.


Urinary Incontinence , Humans , Male , Urinary Incontinence/nursing , Urinary Incontinence/therapy , Urinary Catheterization/nursing , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Penis , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects
5.
Br J Community Nurs ; 29(Sup5): S16-S22, 2024 May 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728166

When an individual has voiding difficulties, the person may require a urinary catheter. Enabling the person to choose an appropriate method of catheterisation and supporting them can have an enormous impact on the individual's health and wellbeing. Indwelling urethral catheters are suitable for some people but for others they can affect a person's lifestyle and lead to depression. Intermittent catheterisation can work well for some people. Intermittent self-catheterisation has been used to manage urinary retention for over 3500 years. It remains the 'gold standard' in terms of bladder drainage, but it is under-used and indwelling catheters remain more common. This article examines the history of intermittent catheterisation, indications for self-catheterisation and how to support people to use self-catheterisation.


Intermittent Urethral Catheterization , Self Care , Urinary Catheterization , Urinary Retention , Humans , Urinary Retention/therapy , Urinary Retention/nursing , Urinary Catheterization/nursing , Catheters, Indwelling , Urinary Catheters , Male
6.
Cir Cir ; 92(2): 189-193, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782384

OBJECTIVE: This study is aiming to compare the results of early and late removal of urinary catheters after rectal cancer surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who undergone rectal cancer surgery in a single center were included in this prospective randomized study. The timing of the urinary catheter removal was randomized by a computer-assisted program and divided into 2 groups, which are early (first 48 h) and late (after 48 h). The primary outcome of this study was to compare the urinary retention and re-catheterization rates between patients with early and those with late catheter removal. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were included in this study. The median age was 60 (31-88 years), and the patient group was predominantly male (n: 40, 60.9%). Urinary retention after catheter removal developed in 8 (12%) of 66 patients. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of the need for re-catheterization (14% vs. 10%, p: 0.63). All the patients who required re-catheterization (n: 8) and were discharged with a urinary catheter (n: 4) were male. When the male and female patients were evaluated separately, there was no difference in urinary retention in the early or late groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early or late removal of the catheter does not play a role in the development of urinary retention in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery.


OBJETIVO: Comparar los resultados de la retirada precoz y tardía de la sonda urinaria tras la cirugía de cáncer rectal. MÉTODO: Estudio prospectivo aleatorizado que incluyó pacientes sometidos a cirugía de cáncer rectal en un único centro. El momento de la retirada de la sonda urinaria se aleatorizó y se dividió en dos grupos: primeras 48 horas y después de 48 horas. Se compararon las tasas de retención urinaria y de nueva cateterización entre los pacientes con retirada precoz y tardía de la sonda. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 66 pacientes, con una mediana de edad de 60 años (31-88 años) y predominio del sexo masculino (n = 40, 60.9%). Se produjo retención urinaria tras la retirada de la sonda en 8 (12%). No hubo diferencias entre los dos grupos en cuanto a necesidad de nueva cateterización (14% frente a 10%, p = 0.63). Todos los pacientes que precisaron un nuevo cateterismo (n = 8) y fueron dados de alta con una sonda urinaria (n = 4) eran varones. CONCLUSIONES: La retirada precoz o tardía de la sonda no influye en la aparición de retención urinaria en pacientes intervenidos de cáncer de recto.


Device Removal , Postoperative Complications , Rectal Neoplasms , Urinary Catheterization , Urinary Catheters , Urinary Retention , Humans , Male , Female , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Middle Aged , Aged , Urinary Retention/etiology , Prospective Studies , Adult , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Aged, 80 and over , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Time Factors , Postoperative Care
7.
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 37(6): 329-335, 2024 Jun 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767425

OBJECTIVE: Urinary catheter-related meatal pressure injury (UCR-MPI) is a preventable and serious complication of indwelling urinary catheter use. This prospective study aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors of UCR-MPI in male critical care patients. METHODS: A total of 138 male patients 18 years and older using an indwelling urinary catheter were included in the study. Participants' perineal areas were assessed daily for the development of MPI. RESULTS: The UCR-MPI prevalence was 26.1% (n = 36/138). Most patients (61.1%) had a grade I UCR-MPI with intact skin and mucosa and nonblanchable erythema. Urinary catheter irrigation (P = .001), lower Braden Scale scores (P = .040), lower Glasgow Coma Scale score (P = .002), higher Itaki Fall Risk Scale score (P = .040), higher dependency level (P = .027), hypoalbuminemia (P = .002), and perineal edema (P = .001) were risk factors for UCR-MPI. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of UCR-MPI was high in this sample. Providers should take preventive measures to prevent UCR-MPI in patients with a penis including early and frequent risk assessment.


Pressure Ulcer , Urinary Catheterization , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Pressure Ulcer/prevention & control , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Aged , Adult , Critical Care/methods , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Prevalence , Risk Assessment/methods
8.
Br J Nurs ; 33(9): S4-S8, 2024 May 09.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722016

Clean intermittent self-catheterisation (CISC) is considered the preferred option to an indwelling catheter for emptying the bladder in people with a range of voiding dysfunctions. CISC has a lower risk of complications and urinary tract infections. This narrative review of previous qualitative research explores the quality-of-life impacts and highlights the challenges that men face. It will provide nurses who teach CISC with some useful insights into the male experience and the issues of concordance and adherence. This will help to better inform and guide clinical practice in this specialist area of nursing practice.


Intermittent Urethral Catheterization , Quality of Life , Self Care , Humans , Male , Urinary Catheterization/nursing , Urinary Catheterization/methods , Qualitative Research
9.
Low Urin Tract Symptoms ; 16(3): e12515, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693055

OBJECTIVES: To investigate factors associated with symptomatic urinary tract infection (sUTI) in persons with chronic spinal cord lesion (SCL) who were using single-use catheters for intermittent self-catheterization (ISC). METHODS: Among respondents to an internet survey on the burden of illness on persons with SCL who were considered to be able to perform ISC, 111 persons using single-use catheters were included to examine factors associated with self-reported sUTI by univariate as well as multivariable analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of sUTI was significantly higher in males than in females (56.9% vs. 31.6%, p = .011), persons with stocks of antibiotics than those without it (82.9% vs. 28.6%, p < .011), and persons with more frequent bleeding during catheterization than those with less frequent bleeding (100% vs. 46.5%, p = .036). The incidence did not significantly differ between respective groups when various variables were evaluated by other characteristics of the participants, adherence to ISC procedures, and complications. On multivariable analysis, male gender and stocks of antibiotics were significant independent factors for sUTI. CONCLUSIONS: Male gender and stocks of antibiotics were associated with sUTI in persons with SCL who were performing ISC with single-use catheters.


Anti-Bacterial Agents , Intermittent Urethral Catheterization , Spinal Cord Injuries , Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , Male , Female , Urinary Tract Infections/etiology , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Adult , Intermittent Urethral Catheterization/adverse effects , Intermittent Urethral Catheterization/instrumentation , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Incidence , Sex Factors , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Aged , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation
10.
Urologiia ; (1): 35-40, 2024 Mar.
Article Ru | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38650404

AIM: To evaluate the effect of antibacterial prophylaxis using oral fosfomycin during the removal of a urethral catheter after radical prostatectomy on the development of urinary tract infection, severity of leukocyturia and bacteriuria, as well as the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center, non-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial was carried out. The main group included 40 patients, and the control group included 37 patients. In the group 1, patients received two doses of oral fosfomycin, 3 g, namely in the evening on the day of catheter removal (the first dose) and 48 hours after catheter removal (the second dose). In the group 2, patients did not receive any antibacterial prophylaxis after urethral catheter removal. The endpoints of the study were confirmed episodes of urinary tract infection within 1 month after removal of the urethral catheter, leukocyturia and bacteriuria in urinalysis/urine culture) and severity of the lower urinary tract symptoms assessed by IPSS questionnaire. RESULTS: In the group 2, urinary tract infection was noted in 17.1%, while in the group 2 only in 2.6% of patients (p=0.032). Leukocyturia and bacteriuria were significantly less common in the group receiving antibacterial prophylaxis with fosfomycin (18.4% vs. 48.6%, respectively; p=0.006). Positive urine culture was observed in 7.9% vs. 25.7%, respectively (p=0.035). Four weeks after removal of the urethral catheter, the average IPSS score was significantly higher in the group 2 (13.2 vs. 9.5 points; p=0.002). There were no cases of allergic reaction and pseudomembranous colitis associated with C. difficile in both groups. Diarrhea cured with sorbents was noted in 2 patients (5.2%) in fosfomycin group. CONCLUSION: Antibacterial prophylaxis using two oral doses of fosfomycin 3 g on the day of urethral catheter removal and 48 hours after catheter removal after radical prostatectomy appears to be an effective scheme that reduces the incidence of urinary tract infection and the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms, and is characterized by a minimal risk of adverse events. It is necessary to carried out further research and develop clear recommendations for antibacterial prevention in urological interventions requiring prolonged urethral catheterization.


Anti-Bacterial Agents , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Fosfomycin , Prostatectomy , Urinary Catheters , Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , Fosfomycin/administration & dosage , Fosfomycin/therapeutic use , Male , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatectomy/methods , Middle Aged , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Aged , Prospective Studies , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Device Removal
12.
Infect Dis Clin North Am ; 38(2): 343-360, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599895

This narrative review explores the use of external urinary catheters. These devices are available in various types and materials for male and female patients. The indications for the use of external urinary catheters include managing incontinence linked to overactive bladder and neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. Contraindications to the use of external urinary catheters include urinary obstruction. Proper skin care and proactive infection control measures are necessary to prevent complications. The collection of a urine specimen for culture requires a standardized technique to prevent contamination. Clinician-led patient education on catheter management plays a important role in ensuring patient comfort and safety.


Catheter-Related Infections , Urinary Catheters , Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Urinary Tract Infections/therapy , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Catheterization/methods , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Male , Female , Infection Control/methods
14.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 9406, 2024 04 24.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38658695

This retrospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of fluoroscopy-guided urethral catheterization in patients who failed blind or cystoscopy-assisted urethral catheterization. We utilized our institutional database between January 2011 and March 2023, and patients with failed blind or cystoscopy-assisted urethral catheterization and subsequent fluoroscopy-guided urethral catheterization were included. A 5-Fr catheter was inserted into the urethral orifice, and the retrograde urethrography (RGU) was acquired. Subsequently, the operator attempted to pass a hydrophilic guidewire to the urethra. If the guidewire and guiding catheter could be successfully passed into the bladder, but the urethral catheter failed pass due to urethral stricture, the operator determined either attempted again with a reduced catheter diameter or performed balloon dilation according to their preference. Finally, an appropriately sized urethral catheter was selected, and an endhole was created using an 18-gauge needle. The catheter was then inserted over the wire to position the tip in the bladder lumen and ballooned to secure it. We reviewed patients' medical histories, the presence of hematuria, and RGU to determine urethral abnormalities. Procedure-related data were assessed. Study enrolled a total of 179 fluoroscopy-guided urethral catheterizations from 149 patients (all males; mean age, 73.3 ± 13.3 years). A total of 225 urethral strictures were confirmed in 141 patients, while eight patients had no strictures. Urethral rupture was confirmed in 62 patients, and hematuria occurred in 34 patients after blind or cystoscopy-assisted urethral catheterization failed. Technical and clinical success rates were 100%, and procedure-related complications were observed in four patients (2.2%). The mean time from request to urethral catheter insertion was 129.7 ± 127.8 min. The mean total fluoroscopy time was 3.5 ± 2.5 min and the mean total DAP was 25.4 ± 25.1 Gy cm2. Balloon dilation was performed in 77 patients. Total procedure time was 9.2 ± 7.6 min, and the mean procedure time without balloon dilation was 7.1 ± 5.7 min. Fluoroscopy-guided urethral catheterization is a safe and efficient alternative in patients where blind or cystoscopy-assisted urethral catheterization has failed or when cystoscopy-urethral catheterization cannot be performed.


Cystoscopy , Urethral Stricture , Urinary Catheterization , Humans , Fluoroscopy/methods , Cystoscopy/methods , Cystoscopy/adverse effects , Male , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Urethral Stricture/therapy , Urethral Stricture/diagnostic imaging , Urinary Catheterization/methods , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Aged, 80 and over , Urethra/diagnostic imaging , Urethra/surgery
15.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 53(5): 102770, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38503382

OBJECTIVE: To compare Foley catheter insertion by digital blind method to its placement with a sterile speculum in women with unripe cervix for induction of labor. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from inception to July 2023. Included studies compared digital to speculum placement of the Foley catheter for labor induction. Data from the included studies were extracted and pooled using RevMan software for meta-analysis. The primary outcome was pain score during the procedure measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included Foley catheter insertion duration, cesarean delivery rate, induction to delivery interval, Bishop score, need for other cervical ripening methods, maternal satisfaction, and maternal fever. RESULTS: Four RCTs involving a total of 600 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pain during the procedure and Foley catheter insertion duration were significantly reduced in the digital insertion group compared to the speculum-guided group (p < 0.05). The Bishop score showed a significant improvement in the digital Foley catheter placement group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the cesarean delivery rate or the requirement for additional cervical ripening methods between the two groups. Maternal satisfaction with the delivery process was significantly improved in the digital insertion group (p < 0.001). Induction to delivery interval and maternal fever were comparable between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Digital placement of Foley catheter can be considered as an alternative to the sterile speculum method for pre-induction cervical ripening. More trials are required to confirm our findings.


Labor, Induced , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Humans , Labor, Induced/methods , Labor, Induced/instrumentation , Female , Pregnancy , Cervical Ripening , Surgical Instruments , Cesarean Section/methods , Urinary Catheterization/methods , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation
16.
Neurourol Urodyn ; 43(4): 1019-1024, 2024 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38516982

Children with a neurogenic bladder are at risk of developing recurrent urinary tract infections and long-term kidney failure. Due to an altered lower urinary tract, children may be overtreated for simple bacteriuria or undertreated for a potentially severe urinary tract infection. This group of patients represent high users of healthcare, and are at risk of colonization and development of antibiotic resistance. Bladder washouts with non-antibiotic electrochemically activated solutions are a potential new prophylactic option for patients with bladder dysfunction when clean intermittent catheterization has resulted in chronic bacteriuria.


Bacteriuria , Intermittent Urethral Catheterization , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic , Urinary Tract Infections , Child , Humans , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/etiology , Urinary Bladder , Urinary Tract Infections/etiology , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects
18.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 6(4): 101349, 2024 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38490333

BACKGROUND: Foley catheter insertion is frequently used for cervical ripening during the induction of labor. However, the insertion failure, safety, maternal side effects, complications, and satisfaction of digital compared with speculum-guided Foley catheter placement have not been evaluated in a large trial involving primigravida. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to compare the insertion failure rate of digital and speculum-based transcervical Foley catheter placement in primigravida. The co-primary outcome was insertion-associated pain. The secondary outcomes were the time required for successful insertion, maternal satisfaction, and maternal complications within 24 hours of Foley insertion. STUDY DESIGN: This randomized, open-label, parallel-arm, noninferiority clinical trial was performed in a large tertiary care university hospital. Primigravida aged >18 years with term gestation (≥37 weeks) were included in this study. Additional inclusion criteria for enrollment in this study were singleton pregnancy with a cephalic presentation, intact membrane, a Bishop score of ≤5, and reassuring preinduction fetal heart rate tracing. All women planned for cervical ripening were assessed for eligibility and were randomized into digital or speculum arms. Foley catheter insertion was performed in a supine lithotomy position. Vaginal and cervical cleaning were performed before insertion. A 22-French Foley balloon catheter was guided digitally or via speculum to position the bulb at the level of the internal os using water-soluble lubricant. Insertion-associated pain was measured using a visual numeric rating scale, and maternal satisfaction was assessed using a set of questions. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-nine pregnant women were assessed for eligibility, and 446 patients were enrolled and randomized. The median age of the parturients was 24 (19-40) and 24 (18-38) years, respectively. The body mass index, gestational age at randomization, the incidence of postdated pregnancy, and prerandomization Bishop scores were comparable. Insertion failure was observed in 24 (10.8%) and 17 (7.6%) women in digital and speculum arms, respectively (relative risk=1.41 [95% confidence interval, 0.78-2.55]; P=.25). Requirements of >1 attempt (5.4% vs 3.6%) followed by the change in hands (3.6% vs 2.7%) were the most common reasons for insertion failure. The median (interquartile range) visual numeric rating scale was comparable (6 [2-9] vs 5 [2-10]; P=.15). The time taken for successful insertion was similar (58 [12-241] vs 54 [10-281]; P=.30). 9.4% and 10.8% of women required additional methods of cervical ripening. More women in the speculum group (41.7% vs 33.2%; P=.06) felt a medium level of discomfort than the digital group. CONCLUSION: Insertion failure and insertion-related pain in the digital approach were comparable to the speculum-guided approach for transcervical Foley catheter insertion in primigravida for cervical ripening. Nevertheless, maternal satisfaction was higher in the digital group because of a lesser level of discomfort.


Cervical Ripening , Gravidity , Labor, Induced , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Cervical Ripening/physiology , Adult , Labor, Induced/methods , Labor, Induced/instrumentation , Urinary Catheterization/methods , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Surgical Instruments , Patient Satisfaction , Young Adult
19.
J Am Coll Surg ; 238(6): 1057-1066, 2024 Jun 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38345219

BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired urinary tract infections (UTIs) have a detrimental effect on patients, families, and hospital resources. The Sydney Children's Hospital Network (SCHN) participates in the NSQIP-Pediatric (NSQIP-P) to monitor postoperative complications. NSQIP-P data revealed that the median UTI rate at SCHN was 1.75% in 2019, 3.5 times higher than the NSQIP-P target rate of 0.5%. Over three quarters of the NSQIP-P identified patients with UTI also had a urinary catheterization performed intraoperatively. A quality improvement project was conducted between mid-2018 and 2021 to minimize catheter-associated UTIs (CAUTIs) at SCHN. STUDY DESIGN: NSQIP-P samples include pediatric (younger than 18 years) surgical patients from an 8-day cycle operative log. NSQIP-P data are statistically analyzed by the American College of Surgeons and provide biannual internationally benchmarked reports. The project used clinical redesign methodology with a 6-phase process for quality improvement projects. RESULTS: The objectives of the project were to reduce urinary catheter duration of use, educate parents or carers, and improve catheter care and insertion technique by health staff. The duration of a urinary catheter in situ reduced from a median of 4.5 to 3 days from 2017 to 2021. The median NSQIP-P UTI rate at SCHN was reduced by 47.4% from 1.75% in 2019 to 0.9% in 2022. CONCLUSIONS: A multifactorial approach in quality improvement has been shown to be an effective strategy to reduce UTI rates at SCHN, and patient outcomes were improved within a 3-year timeframe. Although this project has reduced UTI rates at SCHN, there remain opportunities for further improvement.


Catheter-Related Infections , Quality Improvement , Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Urinary Tract Infections/etiology , Child , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Adolescent , Child, Preschool , Female , Male , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Infant , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Hospitals, Pediatric/standards
20.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 106(7): 569-574, 2024 Apr 03.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38377182

BACKGROUND: As total joint arthroplasty (TJA) moves to the outpatient setting, it is becoming clear that postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a potential impediment to same-day discharge. Although risk factors for POUR have been widely studied, the lack of their clinical utility warrants investigation of specific preoperative factors that can assist in surgical planning and patient optimization. The purpose of the current study was to determine whether preoperative symptom surveys and bladder scanning are useful tools in identifying POUR risk. METHODS: We performed a prospective analysis of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at a high-volume orthopaedic hospital between December 1, 2020, and September 30, 2021. A total of 507 patients (324 female and 183 male) undergoing TJA completed the American Urological Association (AUA) symptom index preoperatively and then again at 14 and 64 days postoperatively. Post-void bladder scans were obtained in the immediate preoperative setting. POUR was defined as a bladder volume of >500 mL that required catheterization. Chi-square and quintile analysis were used to compare bladder scanning volumes, and Student t tests were used to compare AUA scores. RESULTS: The rate of POUR was 37% (66 female and 34 male) and 23% (37 female and 19 male) in the TKA and THA groups, respectively. Increasing post-void residual volume (PVRV) measured on preoperative bladder scanning was found to be predictive of POUR. Among the TKA cohort, younger age and lower body mass index were also associated with increased catheterization, although age was not statistically significant. The AUA symptom survey was not found to correlate with POUR in either population. CONCLUSIONS: There was a predictable and exponential increase in the rate of catheterization as preoperative PVRV increased from 50 to 200 mL. The AUA symptom score showed no utility in predicting POUR in our study population. We propose that preoperative bladder ultrasonography become standard practice in TJA, especially among patients scheduled for same-day discharge. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Urinary Retention , Humans , Male , Female , Urinary Retention/diagnostic imaging , Urinary Retention/etiology , Urinary Bladder/diagnostic imaging , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Retrospective Studies
...