RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is broadly accepted as an imminent risk factor for mortality after heart transplantation (HTx). However, no current HTx recipient risk score includes PVR or other hemodynamic parameters. This study examined the utility of various hemodynamic parameters for risk stratification in a contemporary HTx population. METHODS: Patients from seven German HTx centers undergoing HTx between 2011 and 2015 were included retrospectively. Established risk factors and complete hemodynamic datasets before HTx were analyzed. Outcome measures were overall all-cause mortality, 12-month mortality, and right heart failure (RHF) after HTx. RESULTS: The final analysis included 333 patients (28% female) with a median age of 54 (IQR 46-60) years. The median mean pulmonary artery pressure was 30 (IQR 23-38) mm Hg, transpulmonary gradient 8 (IQR 5-10) mm Hg, and PVR 2.1 (IQR 1.5-2.9) Wood units. Overall mortality was 35.7%, 12-month mortality was 23.7%, and the incidence of early RHF was 22.8%, which was significantly associated with overall mortality (log-rank HR 4.11, 95% CI 2.47-6.84; log-rank p < .0001). Pulmonary arterial elastance (Ea) was associated with overall mortality (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.25-2.30; p < .001) independent of other non-hemodynamic risk factors. Ea values below a calculated cutoff represented a significantly reduced mortality risk (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19-0.76; p < .0001). PVR with the established cutoff of 3.0 WU was not significant. Ea was also significantly associated with 12-month mortality and RHF. CONCLUSIONS: Ea showed a strong impact on post-transplant mortality and RHF and should become part of the routine hemodynamic evaluation in HTx candidates.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Trasplante de Corazón , Enfermedades Vasculares , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Trasplante de Corazón/mortalidad , Hemodinámica , Circulación Pulmonar/fisiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades Vasculares/complicaciones , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Vasculares/fisiopatología , Resistencia Vascular/fisiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare but increasingly recognized cause of acute coronary syndrome. Many patients with SCAD have associated coronary risk factors. However, the implications of arterial hypertension in SCAD patients remain unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess the clinical implications of arterial hypertension in a nationwide cohort of patients with SCAD. METHODS: The Spanish SCAD registry (NCT03607981) prospectively enrolled 318 consecutive patients. All coronary angiograms were centrally analyzed to confirm the diagnosis of SCAD. Patients were classified according to the presence of arterial hypertension. RESULTS: One-hundred eighteen patients (37%) had a diagnosis of arterial hypertension. Hypertensive SCAD patients were older (60 ± 12 vs. 51 ± 9 years old) and had more frequently dyslipidemia (56 vs. 23%) and diabetes (9 vs. 3%) but were less frequently smokers (15 vs. 35%) than normotensive SCAD patients (all P < 0.05). Most patients in both groups were female (90 vs. 87%, NS) and female patients with hypertension were more frequently postmenopausal (70 vs. 47%, P < 0.05). Hypertensive SCAD patients had more severe lesions and more frequently multivessel involvement (15 vs. 7%, P < 0.05) and coronary ectasia (19 vs. 7%, P < 0.05) but showed a similar prevalence of coronary tortuosity (34 vs. 26%, NS). Revascularization requirement was similar in both groups (17 vs. 26%, NS) but procedural success was significantly lower (65 vs. 88%, P < 0.05) and procedural-related complications more frequent (65 vs. 41%, P < 0.05) in SCAD patients with hypertension. CONCLUSION: Patients with SCAD and hypertension are older, more frequently postmenopausal and have more coronary risk factors than normotensive SCAD patients. During revascularization SCAD patients with hypertension obtain poorer results and have a higher risk of procedural-related complications (NCT03607981).
Asunto(s)
Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/complicaciones , Hipertensión Arterial Pulmonar/complicaciones , Enfermedades Vasculares/congénito , Adulto , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/epidemiología , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/mortalidad , Vasos Coronarios/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Hipertensión Arterial Pulmonar/epidemiología , Hipertensión Arterial Pulmonar/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedades Vasculares/complicaciones , Enfermedades Vasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Current practice patterns favor endovascular treatment, resulting in fewer open procedures. When needed, greater saphenous vein and/or prosthetic conduits are considered the first choice for open vascular bypass. However, there is a cohort of patients in which these conduits are either not available or not suitable to address the surgical requirements. One alternative is to use femoropopliteal vein (FPV), an often-overlooked conduit. We report on the contemporary use of FPV in a tertiary vascular institution. METHODS: All patients who underwent FPV harvest, as defined by CPT code 35572, between 2005 and 2019 were identified. Patient demographics (sex, age, baseline laboratory values, medical co-morbidities), indication for use of FPV, complications specific to vein harvest, operative details, post-operative course, and outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Ninety patients had harvest of FPV for creation of 123 conduits. In this study, a conduit was defined as a segment of vein used to perfuse a distinctly separate vascular bed. We identified four cohorts in which FPV was used: aorto-iliac reconstruction in 38 patients for infected graft (19), occlusive disease (8), aortitis (5), mycotic aneurysm (5), and malignancy (1); peripheral artery revascularization in 26 patients for ilio-femoral reconstruction (15), femoropopliteal reconstruction (4), upper extremity/cerebrovascular reconstruction (6), and coronary bypass (1); mesenteric revascularization in 20 patients for acute or acute on chronic ischemia (12), chronic ischemia (7) or aneurysm (1); and dialysis access in 6 patients. There was a high incidence of pre-existing comorbid conditions in all groups, but most notably those patients who underwent aorto-iliac reconstruction. Harvest-related or conduit-related complications included compartment syndrome, graft-associated hemorrhage, surgical site infection, and lymphatic complications. Primary graft patency at 3 years was 83% ± 4% (aorto-iliac), 83% ± 6% (peripheral), 100% (mesenteric), and 23% ± 19% (dialysis access, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: While use of FPV has potential significant harvest-related, conduit-related, or systemic complications, FPV is useful for a variety of needs, almost universally available, and durable. In the current era where endovascular approach is the focus, FPV should not be forgotten as a potential conduit that can be used for a variety of vascular reconstruction indications.
Asunto(s)
Vena Femoral/trasplante , Vena Poplítea/trasplante , Enfermedades Vasculares/cirugía , Injerto Vascular , Adulto , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Vasculares/fisiopatología , Injerto Vascular/efectos adversos , Injerto Vascular/mortalidad , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Canadian Cardiovascular Society 2016 guidelines recommend pre-operative measurement of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) to risk-stratify patients for a 30-day composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, or asymptomatic myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS). Whether this practice affects outcomes is unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the clinical utility of brain natriuretic peptide and myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery. METHODS: Analysis of a prospectively maintained database identified all elective open vascular surgery cases at an academic teaching hospital from January 2015 to December 2018. Pre-operative BNP values were available from June 2018 onward after becoming institutionally mandated. Co-morbidities were also collected to stratify patients using the Revised Cardiac Risk Index. The composite outcome of 30-day mortality, myocardial infarction, or MINS was determined. RESULTS: Prior to BNP becoming an institutionally required test, data was available from 1176 open cases. The 30-day mortality was 1.3% (15/1176) and post-operative myocardial infarction rate was 2.3% (27/1176). BNP measurements were collected in 91 consecutive patients. Ten patients (11%) experienced the composite outcome of mortality, myocardial infarction, or MINS. Elevated BNP was associated with increased odds of the composite outcome (P = 0.04), but not with mortality or myocardial infarction. Revised Cardiac Risk Index score was not predictive of outcomes. The majority of patients who qualified for the composite outcome experienced only an asymptomatic troponin rise (80%). Two patients met the universal definition of myocardial infarction, one of whom died. No other deaths occurred within 30 days. Detection of MINS did not result in any significant changes to patient management. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated BNP correlates with increased MINS. An asymptomatic troponin rise is the most commonly observed event, with unclear clinical implications. BNP may over-estimate surgical risk. Further studies on the long-term outcomes of patients with elevated BNP and MINS are required before widely adopting this strategy in vascular surgery patients.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Cardíacas/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Péptido Natriurético Encefálico/sangre , Enfermedades Vasculares/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Anciano , Biomarcadores/sangre , Femenino , Lesiones Cardíacas/sangre , Lesiones Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Lesiones Cardíacas/mortalidad , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio/sangre , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Troponina/sangre , Enfermedades Vasculares/sangre , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidadRESUMEN
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare connective tissue disease characterized by skin and visceral fibrosis, vascular hyperreactivity and obliterative vasculopathy. Some of its complications such as interstitial lung disease (ILD), pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and heart involvement can be life-threatening and are associated with a high mortality and a poor prognosis. Many clinical trials were carried out in order to improve the survival and prognosis of SSc patients. The management of SSc is based on the frequent and regular assessment of the potential organ damage, and if present, the establishment of graduated pharmacological therapeutic strategies, associated with non-pharmacological procedures. Several randomized clinical trials have showed significant positive outcomes regarding some specific involvements. Many advances have been made, especially in the field of targeted therapies and personalized medicine, based on specific characteristics of the patient and the SSc.
Asunto(s)
Esclerodermia Sistémica/terapia , Cardiopatías/etiología , Cardiopatías/mortalidad , Cardiopatías/terapia , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/etiología , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/mortalidad , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/terapia , Medicina de Precisión , Pronóstico , Hipertensión Arterial Pulmonar/etiología , Hipertensión Arterial Pulmonar/mortalidad , Hipertensión Arterial Pulmonar/terapia , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Esclerodermia Sistémica/mortalidad , Enfermedades Vasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Vasculares/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hypercoagulability is a risk factor of thromboembolic events in COVID-19. Anti-phospholipid (aPL) antibodies have been hypothesized to be involved. Typical COVID-19 dermatological manifestations of livedo reticularis and digital ischemia may resemble cutaneous manifestations of anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS). OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between aPL antibodies and thromboembolic events, COVID-19 severity, mortality, and cutaneous manifestations in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: aPL antibodies [anti-beta2-glycoprotein-1 (B2GP1) and anti-cardiolipin (aCL) antibodies] were titered in frozen serum samples from hospitalized COVID-19 patients and the patients' clinical records were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: 173 patients were enrolled. aPL antibodies were detected in 34.7% of patients, anti-B2GP1 antibodies in 30.1%, and aCL antibodies in 10.4%. Double positivity was observed in 5.2% of patients. Thromboembolic events occurred in 9.8% of patients, including 11 pulmonary embolisms, 1 case of celiac tripod thrombosis, and six arterial ischemic events affecting the cerebral, celiac, splenic, or femoral-popliteal arteries or the aorta. aPL antibodies were found in 52.9% of patients with vascular events, but thromboembolic events were not correlated to aPL antibodies (adjusted OR = 1.69, p = 0.502). Ten patients (5.8%) had cutaneous signs of vasculopathy: nine livedo reticularis and one acrocyanosis. No significant association was observed between the presence of cutaneous vasculopathy and aPL antibodies (p = 0.692). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-phospholipid antibodies cannot be considered responsible for hypercoagulability and thrombotic events in COVID-19 patients. In COVID-19 patients, livedo reticularis and acrocyanosis do not appear to be cutaneous manifestations of APS.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antifosfolípidos/sangre , COVID-19/complicaciones , SARS-CoV-2 , Enfermedades de la Piel/sangre , Enfermedades Vasculares/sangre , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Anticardiolipina/sangre , COVID-19/sangre , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/mortalidad , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Enfermedades de la Piel/inmunología , Enfermedades de la Piel/mortalidad , Enfermedades Vasculares/inmunología , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidad , beta 2 Glicoproteína I/inmunologíaRESUMEN
Cancer treatment-related cardiotoxicity (ie, heart failure, coronary artery disease, vascular diseases, arrhythmia) is a growing cancer survivorship concern within oncology practice; heart disease is the leading cause of noncancer death in cancer survivors and surpasses cancer as the leading cause of death for some cancers with higher survival rates. The issue of cardiotoxicity introduces a critical tradeoff that must be acknowledged and reconciled in clinical oncology practice: treating cancer aggressively and effectively in the present vs preventing future cardiotoxicity. Although many cancers must be treated as aggressively as possible, for others, multiple treatment options are available. Yet even when effective and less cardiotoxic treatments are available, they are not always chosen. Wariness to choose equally effective but less cardiotoxic treatment options may result in part from providers' and patients' reliance on "cognitive heuristics," or mental shortcuts that people (including, research shows, medical professionals) use to simplify complex judgments. These heuristics include delay discounting, availability and affect heuristics, and default bias. In the current commentary, we describe relevant research that illuminates how use of heuristics leads to biased medical decision making and translate how this research may apply when the tradeoff between aggressive cancer treatment and preventing future cardiotoxicity is considered. We discuss the implications of these biases in oncology practice, offer potential solutions to reduce bias, and call for future research in this area.
Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías/etiología , Heurística , Neoplasias/terapia , Enfermedades Vasculares/etiología , Antraciclinas/efectos adversos , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Sesgo , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Cardiotoxicidad/etiología , Cardiotoxicidad/mortalidad , Cardiotoxicidad/prevención & control , Causas de Muerte , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Adhesión a Directriz , Cardiopatías/mortalidad , Cardiopatías/prevención & control , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/radioterapia , Humanos , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Neoplasias/psicología , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Trastuzumab/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Vasculares/prevención & controlAsunto(s)
Cirujanos/tendencias , Enfermedades Vasculares/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/tendencias , Brasil/epidemiología , COVID-19/mortalidad , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/tendencias , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/tendencias , Cirujanos/educación , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/educaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ten-year all-cause death according to incomplete (IR) versus complete revascularization (CR) has not been fully investigated in patients with 3-vessel disease and left main coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: The SYNTAX Extended Survival study (Synergy Between PCI With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: SYNTAX Extended Survival [SYNTAXES]) evaluated vital status up to 10 years in patients who were originally enrolled in the SYNTAX trial. In the present substudy, outcomes of the CABG CR group were compared with the CABG IR, PCI CR, and PCI IR groups. In addition, in the PCI cohort, the residual SYNTAX score (rSS) was used to quantify the extent of IR and to assess its association with fatal late outcome. The rSS of 0 suggests CR, whereas a rSS>0 identifies the degree of IR. RESULTS: IR was more frequently observed in patients with PCI versus CABG (56.6% versus 36.8%) and more common in those with 3-vessel disease than left main coronary artery disease in both the PCI arm (58.5% versus 53.8%) and the CABG arm (42.8% versus 27.5%). Patients undergoing PCI with CR had no significant difference in 10-year all-cause death compared with those undergoing CABG (22.2% for PCI with CR versus 24.3% for CABG with IR versus 23.8% for CABG with CR). In contrast, those with PCI and IR had a significantly higher risk of all-cause death at 10 years compared with CABG and CR (33.5% versus 23.7%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.15-1.91]). When patients with PCI were stratified according to the rSS, those with a rSS≤8 had no significant difference in all-cause death at 10 years as the other terciles (22.2% for rSS=0 versus 23.9% for rSS>0-4 versus 28.9% for rSS>4-8), whereas a rSS>8 had a significantly higher risk of 10-year all-cause death than those undergoing PCI with CR (50.1% versus 22.2%; adjusted hazard ratio, 3.40 [95% CI, 2.13-5.43]). CONCLUSIONS: IR is common after PCI, and the degree of incompleteness was associated with 10-year mortality. If it is unlikely that complete (or nearly complete; rSS<8) revascularization can be achieved with PCI in patients with 3-vessel disease, CABG should be considered. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00114972. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03417050.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidad , Anciano , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Arteria Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Fumar/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Vasculares/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Arteria Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/etiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/mortalidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Fumar/mortalidad , Espirometría , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Vasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidad , Capacidad VitalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the correlation between the functional status at discharge in non-cardiac vascular surgery patients and the out-of-hospital mortality. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study including adult non-cardiac vascular surgery patients (open, endovascular and venous procedures) surviving hospitalization in Boston, Massachusetts, USA. The exposure of interest was functional status determined by a licensed physical therapist at hospital discharge and rated based on qualitative categories adapted from the Functional Independence Measure. The primary outcome was all cause 90-day mortality after hospital discharge. The secondary outcome was readmission within 30days. Adjusted odds ratios were estimated by multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: This cohort included 2318 patients (male 51%; mean age 61 ± 17.7). After evaluation by a physiotherapist, 425 patients scored the lowest functional status, 631 scored moderately low, 681 moderately high and 581 scored the highest functional status. The lowest functional status was associated with a 3.41-fold increased adjusted odds for 90-day mortality (95%CI, 1.70-6.84) compared to patients with the highest functional status. When excluding venous intervention patients, the adjusted odds ratio was 6.76 (95%CI, 2.53-18.12) for the 90-day mortality post-discharge. The adjusted odds for readmission within 30-days was 1.5-fold increase in patients with the lowest functional status (95%CI, 1.04-2.20). CONCLUSIONS: In vascular surgery patients surviving hospitalization, functional status is strongly associated with out-of-hospital mortality and readmission rate. Future trials could provide evidence if improvement of functional status could prevent adverse outcomes in the postoperative setting.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Estado Funcional , Alta del Paciente , Enfermedades Vasculares/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Causas de Muerte , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Vascular surgery patients are highly complex, second only to patients undergoing cardiac procedures. However, unlike cardiac surgery, work relative value units (wRVU) for vascular surgery were undervalued based on an overall patient complexity score. This study assesses the correlation of patient complexity with wRVUs for the most commonly performed inpatient vascular surgery procedures. METHODS: The 2014 to 2017 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Data Files were queried for inpatient cases performed by vascular surgeons. A previously developed patient complexity score using perioperative domains was calculated based on patient age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class of ≥4, major comorbidities, emergent status, concurrent procedures, additional procedures, hospital length of stay, nonhome discharge, and 30-day major complications, readmissions, and mortality. Procedures were assigned points based on their relative rank and then an overall score was created by summing the total points. An observed to expected ratio (O/E) was calculated using open ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (rOAAA) as the referent and then applied to an adjusted median wRVU per operative minute. RESULTS: Among 164,370 cases, patient complexity was greatest for rOAAA (complexity score = 128) and the least for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) (complexity score = 29). Patients undergoing rOAAA repair had the greatest proportion of American Society of Anesthesiologists class of ≥IV (84.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 82.6%-86.8%), highest mortality (35.5%; 95% CI, 32.8%-38.3%), and major complication rate (87.1%; 95% CI, 85.1%-89.0%). Patients undergoing CEA had the lowest mortality (0.7%; 95% CI, 0.7%-0.8%), major complication rate (8.2%; 95% 95% CI, 8.0%-8.5%), and shortest length of stay (2.7 days; 95% CI, 2.7-2.7). The median wRVU ranged from 10.0 to 42.1 and only weakly correlated with overall complexity (Spearman's ρ = 0.11; P < .01). The median wRVU per operative minute was greatest for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (0.25) and lowest for both axillary-femoral artery bypass (0.12) and open femoral endarterectomy, thromboembolectomy, or reconstruction (0.12). After adjusting for patient complexity, CEA (O/E = 3.8) and transcarotid artery revascularization (O/E = 2.8) had greater than expected O/E. In contrast, lower extremity bypass (O/E = 0.77), lower extremity embolectomy (O/E = 0.79), and open abdominal aortic repair (O/E = 0.80) had a lower than expected O/E. CONCLUSIONS: Patient complexity varies substantially across vascular procedures and is not captured effectively by wRVUs. Increased operative time for open procedures is not adequately accounted for by wRVUs, which may unfairly penalize surgeons who perform complex open operations.
Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Escalas de Valor Relativo , Enfermedades Vasculares/economía , Enfermedades Vasculares/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente/economía , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Sistema de Registros , Reembolso de Incentivo/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The ideal management of spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) has yet to be clearly defined. We conducted a comprehensive search of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and Web of Science from database inception from 1966 through September 2020 for all original studies (randomized controlled trials and observational studies) that evaluated patients with SCAD. Study groups were defined by allocation to medical therapy (medical therapy) versus invasive therapy (invasive therapy) (ie, percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting). The risk of death (risk ratio [RR] = 0.753; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21-2.73; I2 = 21.1%; P = 0.61), recurrence of SCAD (RR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.61-1.93; I2 = 0.0%; P = 0.74), and repeat revascularization (RR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.21-1.94; I2 = 57.6%; P = 0.38) were not statistically different between medical therapy and invasive therapy for a follow-up ranging from 4 months to 3 years. In conclusion, in this meta-analysis of observational studies, the long-term risk of death, recurrent SCAD, and repeat revascularization did not significantly differ among patients with SCAD treated with medical therapy compared with those treated with invasive therapy. These findings support the current expert consensus that patients should be treated with medical therapy when clinically stable and no high-risk features are present. Further large-scale studies including randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.
Asunto(s)
Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/cirugía , Revascularización Miocárdica/normas , Tiempo , Enfermedades Vasculares/congénito , Adulto , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Revascularización Miocárdica/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Vasculares/cirugíaRESUMEN
Importance: Cohort studies report inconsistent associations between fish consumption, a major source of long-chain ω-3 fatty acids, and risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. Whether the associations vary between those with and those without vascular disease is unknown. Objective: To examine whether the associations of fish consumption with risk of CVD or of mortality differ between individuals with and individuals without vascular disease. Design, Setting, and Participants: This pooled analysis of individual participant data involved 191â¯558 individuals from 4 cohort studies-147â¯645 individuals (139â¯827 without CVD and 7818 with CVD) from 21 countries in the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study and 43â¯413 patients with vascular disease in 3 prospective studies from 40 countries. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated by multilevel Cox regression separately within each study and then pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. This analysis was conducted from January to June 2020. Exposures: Fish consumption was recorded using validated food frequency questionnaires. In 1 of the cohorts with vascular disease, a separate qualitative food frequency questionnaire was used to assess intake of individual types of fish. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mortality and major CVD events (including myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure, or sudden death). Results: Overall, 191â¯558 participants with a mean (SD) age of 54.1 (8.0) years (91â¯666 [47.9%] male) were included in the present analysis. During 9.1 years of follow-up in PURE, compared with little or no fish intake (≤50 g/mo), an intake of 350 g/wk or more was not associated with risk of major CVD (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.86-1.04) or total mortality (HR, 0.96; 0.88-1.05). By contrast, in the 3 cohorts of patients with vascular disease, the HR for risk of major CVD (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.96) and total mortality (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.74-0.91) was lowest with intakes of at least 175 g/wk (or approximately 2 servings/wk) compared with 50 g/mo or lower, with no further apparent decrease in HR with consumption of 350 g/wk or higher. Fish with higher amounts of ω-3 fatty acids were strongly associated with a lower risk of CVD (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92-0.97 per 5-g increment of intake), whereas other fish were neutral (collected in 1 cohort of patients with vascular disease). The association between fish intake and each outcome varied by CVD status, with a lower risk found among patients with vascular disease but not in general populations (for major CVD, I2 = 82.6 [P = .02]; for death, I2 = 90.8 [P = .001]). Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this pooled analysis of 4 cohort studies indicated that a minimal fish intake of 175 g (approximately 2 servings) weekly is associated with lower risk of major CVD and mortality among patients with prior CVD but not in general populations. The consumption of fish (especially oily fish) should be evaluated in randomized trials of clinical outcomes among people with vascular disease.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Conducta Alimentaria/fisiología , Peces/metabolismo , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidad , Animales , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/dietoterapia , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Ácidos Grasos Omega-3/metabolismo , Ácidos Grasos Omega-3/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedades Vasculares/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to report the changes and adaptations of a vascular tertiary center during a global pandemic and the impact on its activity and patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study within the Vascular Surgery ward in Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Portugal. All data from surgical, inpatient and outpatient activity were collected from February to June 2020 and compared to the same 5-month period in 2018 and 2019. We ran a descriptive analysis of all data and performed statistical tests for the variation of procedures and admissions between February and June 2018 and the same time period in 2020. RESULTS: During the outbreak, our staff had to be readapted. Six nurses were transferred to COVID-19 units (out of a total of 33 nurses) while 1 of the 7 residents was transferred to an intensive care unit and 1 senior surgeon was put on prophylactic leave. In the outpatient clinic, there was an increase in the number of telemedicine consultations with a greater focus on first-time referrals and urgent cases. There was a significant increase in the total number of elective admissions whereas there were significantly less admissions from an emergency setting (+57% and -54%, respectively, P < 0.001). The vascular surgery team performed a total number of 584 procedures between February and June 2020 (-17.8% compared to 2018 and 2019), with a significant increase in the number of endovascular procedures (P < 0.001) and in the use of local and regional anesthesia (P < 0.001), especially in the Angio Suite (+600%, P < 0.001). Comparing with 2018 and 2019, the surgical team performed less outpatient procedures in early 2020. We reported a significant increase in the total number of procedures for patients with a chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) diagnosis (+21%, P < 0.001). We did not report significant changes in the proportion of other vascular conditions. Regarding mortality, we observed a 16% decrease in the intraoperative mortality (P 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we assessed the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak in daily activity during the contingency period. During the outbreak, there was an overall decline in outpatient clinics and inpatient admissions. Nevertheless, and despite the restrictions imposed by the pandemic and health authorities, we managed to maintain most procedures for most vascular diseases, particularly for CLTI urgent cases, without a significant increase in the mortality rate. Stringent protective measures for patient and staff or higher use of endovascular techniques and local anesthesia are some of the successful changes implemented in the department. These learned lessons are to be pursued as the pandemic evolves with future outbreaks of COVID-19, such as the current second outbreak currently spreading through Europe.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Administración Hospitalaria , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Unidades Hospitalarias/organización & administración , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Portugal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades Vasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Vasculares/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Frailty has persistently been associated with unfavorable short-term outcomes after vascular surgery, including an increased complication risk, greater readmission rate, and greater short-term mortality. However, a knowledge gap remains concerning the association between preoperative frailty and long-term mortality. In the present study, we aimed to determine this association in elective vascular surgery patients. METHODS: The present study was a part of a large prospective cohort study initiated in 2010 in our tertiary referral teaching hospital to study frailty in elderly elective vascular surgery patients (Vascular Ageing Study). A total of 639 patients with a minimal follow-up of 5 years, who had been treated from 2010 to 2014, were included in the present study. The Groningen Frailty Indicator, a 15-item self-administered questionnaire, was used to determine the presence and degree of frailty. RESULTS: Of the 639 patients, 183 (28.6%) were considered frail preoperatively. For the frail patients, the actuarial survival after 1, 3, and 5 years was 81.4%, 66.7%, and 55.7%, respectively. For the nonfrail patients, the corresponding survival was 93.6%, 83.3%, and 75.2% (log-rank test, P < .001). Frail patients had a significantly greater risk of 5-year mortality (unadjusted hazard ratio, 2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.572-2.771; P < .001). After adjusting for surgical- and patient-related risk factors, the hazard ratio was 1.68 (95% confidence interval, 1.231-2.286; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have shown that preoperative frailty is associated with significantly increased long-term mortality after elective vascular surgery. Knowledge of a patient's preoperative frailty state could, therefore, be helpful in shared decision-making, because it provides more information about the procedural benefits and risks.
Asunto(s)
Anciano Frágil , Fragilidad/mortalidad , Enfermedades Vasculares/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Femenino , Fragilidad/diagnóstico , Evaluación Geriátrica , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The COVIDSurg collaborative was an international multicenter prospective analysis of perioperative data from 235 hospitals in 24 countries. It found that perioperative COVID-19 infection was associated with a mortality rate of 24%. At the same time, the COVER study demonstrated similarly high perioperative mortality rates in vascular surgical patients undergoing vascular interventions even without COVID-19, likely associated with the high burden of comorbidity associated with vascular patients. This is a vascular subgroup analysis of the COVIDSurg cohort. METHODS: All patients with a suspected or confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 in the 7 days prior to, or in the 30 days following a vascular procedure were included. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were pulmonary complications (adult respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia and respiratory failure). Logistic regression was undertaken for dichotomous outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 602 patients were included in this subgroup analysis, of which 88.4% were emergencies. The most common operations performed were for vascular-related dialysis access procedures (20.1%, N.=121). The combined 30-day mortality rate was 27.2%. Composite secondary pulmonary outcomes occurred in half of the vascular patients (N.=275, 45.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality following vascular surgery in COVID positive patients was significantly higher than levels reported pre-pandemic, and similar to that seen in other specialties in the COVIDSurg cohort. Initiatives and surgical pathways that ensure vascular patients are protected from exposure to COVID-19 in the peri-operative period are vital to protect against excess mortality.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Salud Global/tendencias , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Enfermedades Vasculares/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/tendencias , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/mortalidad , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Seguridad del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Frailty is a syndrome where the ability to cope with acute physiological stress is compromised, although it is unclear what impact this stress has on long-term outcomes. Vascular-Physiological and Operative Severity Score for enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity is a validated method for calculating levels of stress associated with vascular procedures. We designed this study to evaluate the long-term impact of different levels of surgical stress among frail older patients undergoing vascular surgery procedures. METHODS: We identified all independently living patients who underwent prospective frailty assessment followed by an elective vascular surgery procedure captured in the Vascular Quality Initiative registry (endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm [AAA] repair, thoracic endovascular aortic repair, suprainguinal and infrainguinal bypass, peripheral vascular intervention, carotid endarterectomy, and open AAA) at an academic institution between January 2016 and July 2018. Patient- and procedure-level data were obtained from our institutional data warehouse and Vascular Quality Initiative database, and used to calculate Vascular-Physiological and Operative Severity Score for enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity scores. The association between frailty and composite outcome of any major complications (surgical site infection; graft thrombectomy; major amputation; adverse cardiac, pulmonary, or neurologic event; acute renal insufficiency; and/or reoperation related to the index procedure), nonhome living status, or death within 1 year after low-, medium-, and high-stress vascular procedures was evaluated using bivariate and logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 163 patients were identified (70% male, mean age 67.8 years) who underwent open AAA repair (6%), endovascular AAA repair (21%), thoracic endovascular aortic repair (7%), suprainguinal bypass (5%), infrainguinal bypass (18%), carotid endarterectomy (18%), or peripheral vascular interventions (25%), which included 44 (27%) patients diagnosed with frailty before surgery. Overall, frail patients had significantly higher rates of the 1-year composite outcome (48% frail versus 27% nonfrail; P = 0.012) when compared with nonfrail patients, with a significant dose-dependent effect as the level of stress increased. In comparison, increasing levels of surgical stress had a negligible effect on long-term outcomes among nonfrail patients. The interaction between frailty and high surgical stress was found in adjusted regression models to be a significant predictor of adverse outcomes within 1 year after vascular surgery (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-8.6; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Frail patients who undergo high-stress vascular procedures have a significantly higher rate of complications leading to loss of functional independence and mortality within the year after their surgery. These data suggest that estimates of surgical stress should be incorporated into clinical decision making for frail older patients before and after surgery.
Asunto(s)
Anciano Frágil , Fragilidad/complicaciones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Enfermedades Vasculares/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Fragilidad/diagnóstico , Fragilidad/mortalidad , Estado Funcional , Evaluación Geriátrica , Humanos , Vida Independiente , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Vasculares/complicaciones , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To highlight differences in clinical practice among referral (hub, HH) or satellite (spoke, SH) hospital vascular surgery units (VSUs) in Lombardy, during the COVID-19 pandemic "phase 1" period (March 8 - May 3, 2020). METHODS: The Vascular Surgery Group of Regione Lombardia Register, a real-word, multicenter, retrospective register was interrogated. All patients admitted with vascular disease were included. Patients' data on demographics, COVID-19 positivity, comorbidities and outcomes were extrapolated. Two cohorts were obtained: patients admitted to HH or SH. Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality rate. Secondary outcomes were 30-day complications and amputation (in case of peripheral artery disease [PAD]) rates. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to compare HH and SH groups and predictors of poor outcomes. RESULTS: During the study period, 659 vascular patients in 4 HH and 27 SH were analyzed. Among these, 321 (48.7%) were admitted to a HH. No difference in COVID-19 positive patients was described (21.7% in HH vs. 15.9% in SH; P=0.058). After 30 days from intervention, HH and SH experienced similar mortality and no-intervention-related complication rate (12.1% vs. 10.0%; P=0.427 and 10.3% vs. 8.3%; P=0.377, respectively). Conversely, in HH postoperative complications were higher (23.4% vs. 16.9%, P=0.038) and amputations in patients treated for PAD were lower (10.8% vs. 26.8%; P<0.001) than in SH. Multivariate analysis demonstrated in both cohorts COVID-19-related pneumonia as independent predictor of death and postoperative complications, while age only for death. CONCLUSIONS: HH and SH ensured stackable results in patients with vascular disease during COVID-19 "phase 1." Despite this, poor outcomes were observed in both HH and SH cohorts, due to COVID-19 infection and its related pneumonia.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Vasculares/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/mortalidad , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Neumonía Viral/virología , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Enfermedades Vasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: During the most aggressive phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy, the Regional Authority of Lombardy identified a number of hospitals, named Hubs, chosen to serve the whole region for highly specialised cases, including vascular surgery. This study reports the experience of the four Hubs for Vascular Surgery in Lombardy and provides a comparison of in hospital mortality and major adverse events (MAEs) according to COVID-19 testing. METHODS: Data from all patients who were referred to the Vascular Surgery Department of Hubs from 9 March to 28 April 2020 were collected prospectively and analysed. A positive COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction swab test, or symptoms (fever > 37.5 °C, upper respiratory tract symptoms, chest pain, and contact/travel history) associated with interstitial pneumonia on chest computed tomography scan were considered diagnostic of COVID-19 disease. Patient characteristics, operative variables, and in hospital outcomes were compared according to COVID-19 testing. A multivariable model was used to identify independent predictors of in hospital death and MAEs. RESULTS: Among 305 included patients, 64 (21%) tested positive for COVID-19 (COVID group) and 241 (79%) did not (non-COVID group). COVID patients presented more frequently with acute limb ischaemia than non-COVID patients (64% vs. 23%; p < .001) and had a significantly higher in hospital mortality (25% vs. 6%; p < .001). Clinical success, MAEs, re-interventions, and pulmonary and renal complications were significantly worse in COVID patients. Independent risk factors for in hospital death were COVID (OR 4.1), medical treatment (OR 7.2), and emergency setting (OR 13.6). COVID (OR 3.4), obesity class V (OR 13.5), and emergency setting (OR 4.0) were independent risk factors for development of MAEs. CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic in Lombardy, acute limb ischaemia was the most frequent vascular disease requiring surgical treatment. COVID-19 was associated with a fourfold increased risk of death and a threefold increased risk of major adverse events.