Corticosteroids for patients with vestibular neuritis: An evidence synthesis for guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: A short course of corticosteroids is among the management strategies considered by specialists for the treatment of vestibular neuritis (VN). We conducted an umbrella review (systematic review of systematic reviews) to summarize the evidence of corticosteroids use for the treatment of VN. METHODS: We included systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that evaluated the effects of corticosteroids compared to placebo or usual care in adult patients with acute VN. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened in duplicate. The quality of reviews was assessed with the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2) tool. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment was used to rate certainty of evidence. No meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: From 149 titles, five systematic reviews were selected for quality assessment, and two reviews were of higher methodological quality and were included. These two reviews included 12 individual studies and 660 patients with VN. In a meta-analysis of two RCTs including a total of 50 patients, the use of corticosteroids (compared to placebo) was associated with higher complete caloric recovery (risk ratio 2.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32 to 6.00, low certainty). It is very uncertain whether this translates into clinical improvement as shown by the imprecise effect estimates for outcomes such as patient-reported vertigo or patient-reported dizziness disability. There was a wide CI for the outcome of dizziness handicap score (one study, 30 patients, 20.9 points in corticosteroids group vs. 15.8 points in placebo, mean difference +5.1, 95% CI -8.09 to +18.29, very low certainty). Higher rates of minor adverse effects for those receiving corticosteroids were reported, but the certainty in this evidence was very low. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence to support the use of corticosteroids for the treatment of VN in the emergency department.

Objective evaluation of the effect of flunarizine on vestibular neuritis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether vestibular autorotation tests (VAT) would show significant differences in vestibular oculomotor reflex (VOR) parameters in vertiginous patients before and after treatment with flunarizine. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study in a tertiary referral academic center. METHODS: Twenty-three patients (10 men, 13 women, mean age 45.57 years, mean length of disease 99.48 days, mean treatment 38.61 days), with vertigo due to vestibular neuritis, underwent VAT testing before and after treatment with 5 mg of flunarizine daily. RESULTS: The parameter improvement value (IV) resulted from subtracting posttreatment from pretreatment VAT numerical values. Regarding subjective improvement, 3 patients (13%) said they had none, 5 (21.7%) expressed moderate progress, 9 (39.1) considered the results satisfactory, and 6 (26%) became asymptomatic. The VAT results gave high positive IV for horizontal restriction, low positive for horizontal and vertical gains and horizontal asymmetry, and negative IV for horizontal phase and vertical restriction. Regarding the individual frequencies, horizontal and vertical gains improved in all the frequencies tested except one. The horizontal phase improved at low frequencies (2.0 and 2.3 Hz) and deteriorated from 2.7 to 3.9 Hz. Vertical and horizontal restriction showed both improvement and deterioration. Horizontal asymmetry displayed improvement from -0.01 at 2.0 Hz to 0.50 at 5.9 Hz, deteriorating from -0.41 at 9.0 Hz. CONCLUSIONS: Flunarizine is useful in the treatment of vertigo caused by vestibular neuritis. VAT is a valid instrument for the objective and quantitative evaluation of the vestibular-oculomotor reflexes.