Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 2 de 2
1.
Sci Total Environ ; 657: 1568-1577, 2019 Mar 20.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30677922

A worth noticing pattern in current invasive biology is the clonal ability of many of the world's worst invasive plants. Selective placement of ramets (i.e. foraging behavior) can intensify ramet performance and allocation, and place more ramets in the more favorable microhabitats, which can maximum utilize resource and share risk in heterogeneous environments. Still little is known about whether invasive alien and native clonal plants differ in the selective placement patterns of ramets in invasive clonal plants or not. We used five congeneric pairs of naturally co-occurring invasive alien and native clonal plant species in China. In a glasshouse, we grew all species in pots under a homogeneous and three heterogeneous conditions (i.e. light, soil nutrients or water) subjected to resource-high or -low patches. All biomass parameters and number of ramets significantly increased in resource-high patches in all three types of heterogeneous environments. Interestingly, growth of invasive alien plants benefited significantly more from resource-high patches than native plants in all heterogeneous environments. Overall, invasive had higher biomass parameters per ramet than natives. Ramet parameters of invasive plants also benefited more from resource-low patches than natives. Three different selective placement patterns of ramets in resource-low patches were exhibited in invasive plants: ramet increasing shoot investment (above pattern), increasing root investment (below pattern) and increasing both investments (complete pattern) in the light, soil water and nutrient heterogeneity, respectively. Investment on less, larger ramet was the adaptive strategy of invasive plants in resource-poor patches. The results suggest that adaptively selective placement patterns of ramets promote a higher morphology plasticity and performance in invasive clonal plants over natives. When alien clonal plants spread new areas with light, soil nutrients or water heterogeneity, selective placement patterns of ramets might play an important role in plant performance and competitive superior by capitalizing more on additional resources.


Amaranthaceae/physiology , Araliaceae/physiology , Cloning, Organism , Introduced Species , Paspalum/physiology , Wedelia/physiology , Adaptation, Physiological , Amaranthaceae/growth & development , Amaranthaceae/radiation effects , Araliaceae/growth & development , Araliaceae/radiation effects , Biomass , China , Paspalum/growth & development , Paspalum/radiation effects , Plant Development/radiation effects , Soil/chemistry , Water , Wedelia/growth & development , Wedelia/radiation effects
2.
Ann Bot ; 114(2): 425-33, 2014 Aug.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24825293

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Invasive clonal plants have two reproduction patterns, namely sexual and vegetative propagation. However, seedling recruitment of invasive clonal plants can decline as the invasion process proceeds. For example, although the invasive clonal Wedelia trilobata (Asteraceae) produces numerous seeds, few seedlings emerge under its dense population canopy in the field. In this study it is hypothesized that light limitation and the presence of a thick layer of its own litter may be the primary factors causing the failure of seedling recruitment for this invasive weed in the field. METHODS: A field survey was conducted to determine the allocation of resources to sexual reproduction and seedling recruitment in W. trilobata. Seed germination was also determined in the field. Effects of light and W. trilobata leaf extracts on seed germination and seedling growth were tested in the laboratory. KEY RESULTS: Wedelia trilobata blooms profusely and produces copious viable seeds in the field. However, seedlings of W. trilobata were not detected under mother ramets and few emerged seedlings were found in the bare ground near to populations. In laboratory experiments, low light significantly inhibited seed germination. Leaf extracts also decreased seed germination and inhibited seedling growth, and significant interactions were found between low light and leaf extracts on seed germination. However, seeds were found to germinate in an invaded field after removal of the W. trilobata plant canopy. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that lack of light and the presence of its own litter might be two major factors responsible for the low numbers of W. trilobata seedlings found in the field. New populations will establish from seeds once the limiting factors are eliminated, and seeds can be the agents of long-distance dispersal; therefore, prevention of seed production remains an important component in controlling the spread of this invasive clonal plant.


Light , Plant Leaves/physiology , Plant Weeds/physiology , Reproduction, Asexual , Seedlings/growth & development , Wedelia/physiology , Wedelia/radiation effects , Analysis of Variance , China , Clone Cells , Germination/drug effects , Germination/radiation effects , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Plant Leaves/drug effects , Plant Leaves/radiation effects , Plant Weeds/drug effects , Plant Weeds/radiation effects , Seedlings/drug effects , Seedlings/radiation effects , Wedelia/drug effects
...