Resemblance to vWD types and laboratory diagnosis of obligatory carriers of type 3 von Willebrand disease.

OBJECTIVES: It is important to diagnose obligatory carrier (OC) type 3 von Willebrand Disease (vWD) in countries, such as Turkey, where marriages between relatives is common. However, mild bleeding or no bleeding in such patients complicates the diagnosis of the disease. It is not clear how the diagnosis of OC type 3 vWD will be made based on FVIII:C (Factor VIII activity), vWF:Ag (von Willebrand factor antigen), vWF:RCo (von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity), and PFA (platelet function analyzer )-100 parameters. Therefore, the purpose of the study is to investigate how OC type 3 vWD diagnoses may be established by studying laboratory phenotypes of close relatives of patients with diagnosed 3 vWD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 8 patients with type 3 vWD (index cases) and 20 patients who were defined as OCs type 3 vWD were enrolled into the study. RESULT: 10 cases had similarity with mild type VWD, 4 cases had similarity with moderate type 1 vWD, 4 other cases had type 1 or 2 vWD similarities, 1 case had similarity with severe type 1 vWD, and 1 case also had similarity with severe type 1 or type 2 vWD; regarding their laboratory phenotypic characteristics. CONCLUSION: we identified that OC type 3 vWD is similar specifically to type 1 vWD in terms of laboratory phenotypic character, and we suggest that it may be used with PFA-100 as an easy and fast method in screening relatives.

An evaluation of the DDAVP infusion test with PFA-100 and vWF activity assays to distinguish vWD types in children.

von Willebrand disease (vWD) is classified into partial (type 1), qualitative (type 2), and total deficiency (type 3).The aims of the study were to evaluate prospectively the potency of the DDAVP infusion test together with von Willebrand factor (vWF) ristocetin cofactor (vWF:RCo), vWF antigen (vWF:Ag), factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C), and platelet function analyzer (PFA)-100 to distinguish vWD types. Genetic analysis and multimeric analysis of vWF was not applied. We classified the 112 patients and 47 healthy children phenotypically according to the laboratory test results and bleeding severity score. PFA-100 closure times (CT), FVIII:C, vWF:RCo, vWF:Ag, ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA), and the response of FVIII:C and vWF parameters to desmopressin (DDAVP) were used to define types 1, 2, and 3 vWD. Type 1 vWD is mild in 34 cases (vWF:RCo % 40-55), moderate in 29 (vWF:RCo %27-40), severe type 1 vWD or nonclassical type 2 vWD in 12 cases (vWF:RCo % 4-16), and type 2 vWD in 23 cases (vWF:RCo %4-38).The response to DDAVP of vWF parameters is normal in all patients with mild/moderate type 1 vWD, 6 patients with severe type 1 vWD or nonclassical type 2 vWD and 11 patients with type 2 vWD. In conclusion, this study showed that measurement of vWF:RCo, vWF:Ag, FVIII:C, and PFA-100 parameters can differentiate vWD types but not severe type 1 vWD or nonclassical type 2 vWD. In the differentiation of severe type 1 vWD and nonclassical type 2 vWD, DDAVP response may be used.