Measurement of drug in small particles from aqueous nasal sprays by Andersen Cascade Impactor.

PURPOSE: To determine if cascade impactor (CI) measurement of drug in small particles from aqueous nasal sprays, described in FDA's 2003 draft Nasal Bioavailability/Bioequivalence Guidance, can be optimized to reduce measurement variability. To examine the influence of flow rate configurations and number of impactor stages on CI deposition and explore the importance of inlet volume. METHODS: A total of eight assemblies and manual vs. automatic actuation were tested for deposition on the sum of all stages of the CI, and for Group 2 total drug mass per the Guidance. Mean deposition and variance about the mean were determined for each assembly. RESULTS: The path length for a spherical 1 l inlet was too short to allow adequate aerosol formation. Data variance was reduced by a factor of two or more by using an automatic actuator relative to manual actuation. Impactor assembly modification did not improve variance over the standard assembly. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a spherical inlet (≥ 2 l volume) and automatic actuation are recommended for comparative measurements of drug in small particles arising from aqueous nasal sprays. The standard (8-stage) 28.3 lpm CI flow rate configuration is recommended when using the Andersen Cascade Impactor (ACI), as no other assembly showed a distinct advantage.

Effects of device and formulation on in vitro performance of dry powder inhalers.

The study examined the sensitivity of DPI in vitro performance to formulation and device changes. Rotahaler/Rotacaps was selected as the reference DPI drug product, and Aerolizer was selected as the test device. Since the test device was recognized to have much greater efficiency of dispersion, simple modifications to both formulation and device were made in an effort to provide a closer match to the in vitro performance of the reference product. The modifications included varying the drug and lactose particle sizes and/or lactose fine particle content in the test formulations, as well as lowering the specific resistance of the test device. These modifications were intended to address variables important for drug product performance for a defined experimental design and were not intended to mimic the extensive formulation and device design strategies that are employed in an industrial setting. Formulation and device modifications resulted in a modified test product that approached the reference product in the in vitro performance.

Role of pharmacokinetics in establishing bioequivalence for orally inhaled drug products: workshop summary report.

In April 2010 a workshop on the "Role of Pharmacokinetics in Establishing Bioequivalence for Orally Inhaled Drug Products" was sponsored by the Product Quality Research Institute (PQRI) in coordination with Respiratory Drug Delivery (RDD) 2010. The objective of the workshop was to evaluate the current state of knowledge and identify gaps in information relating to the potential use of pharmacokinetics (PK) as the key indicator of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) of locally acting orally inhaled products (OIPs). In addition, the strengths and limitations of the PK approach to detect differences in product performance compared with in vitro and pharmacodynamic (PD)/clinical/therapeutic equivalence (TE) studies were discussed. The workshop discussed the relationship between PK and lung deposition, in vitro assessment, and PD studies and examined potential PK study designs that could serve as pivotal BE studies. It has been recognized that the sensitivity to detect differences in product performance generally decreases as one moves from in vitro testing to PD measurements. The greatest challenge in the use of PD measurements with some OIPs (particularly inhaled corticosteroids) is the demonstration of a dose-response relationship (for local effects), without which the bioassay, and hence a PD study, may not have sufficient sensitivity to detect differences in product performance. European authorities allow demonstration of in vivo BE of OIPs based solely on pharmacokinetic studies. This workshop demonstrated broader interest among discipline experts and regulators to explore approaches for the use of PK data as the key determinant of in vivo equivalence of locally acting OIPs. If accepted, the suggested approach (PK alone or in conjunction with in vitro tests) could potentially be applied to demonstrate BE of certain orally inhaled drugs.

Demonstrating Bioequivalence of Locally Acting Orally Inhaled Drug Products (OIPs): Workshop Summary Report.

This March 2009 Workshop Summary Report was sponsored by Product Quality Research Institute (PQRI) based on a proposal by the Inhalation and Nasal Technology Focus Group (INTFG) of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS). Participants from the pharmaceutical industry, academia and regulatory bodies from the United States, Europe, India, and Brazil attended the workshop with the objective of presenting, reviewing, and discussing recommendations for demonstrating bioequivalence (BE) that may be considered in the development of orally inhaled drug products and regulatory guidances for new drug applications (NDAs), abbreviated NDAs (ANDAs), and postapproval changes. The workshop addressed areas related to in vitro approaches to demonstrating BE, biomarker strategies, imaging techniques, in vivo approaches to establishing local delivery equivalence and device design similarity. The workshop presented material that provided a baseline for the current understanding of orally inhaled drug products (OIPs) and identified gaps in knowledge and consensus that, if answered, might allow the design of a robust, streamlined method for the BE assessment of locally acting inhalation drugs. These included the following: (1) cascade impactor (CI) studies are not a good 2 predictor of the pulmonary dose; more detailed studies on in vitro/in vivo correlations (e.g., suitability of CI studies for assessing differences in the regional deposition) are needed; (2) there is a lack of consensus on the appropriate statistical methods for assessing in vitro results; (3) fully validated and standardized imaging methods, while capable of providing information on pulmonary dose and regional deposition, might not be applicable to the BE of inhaled products mainly due to the problems of having access to radiolabeled innovator product; (4) if alternatives to current methods for establishing local delivery BE of OIPs cannot be established, biomarkers (pharmacodynamic or clinical endpoints) with a sufficiently steep dose-response need to be identified and validated for all relevant drug classes; and (5) the utility of pharmacokinetic studies for evaluating "local pulmonary delivery" equivalence deserves more attention. A summary of action items for seminars and working groups to address these topics in the future is also presented.

In vitro considerations to support bioequivalence of locally acting drugs in dry powder inhalers for lung diseases.

Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are used to deliver locally acting drugs (e.g., bronchodilators and corticosteroids) for treatment of lung diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Demonstrating bioequivalence (BE) for DPI products is challenging, primarily due to an incomplete understanding of the relevance of drug concentrations in blood or plasma to equivalence in drug delivery to the local site(s) of action. Thus, BE of these drug/device combination products is established based on an aggregate weight of evidence, which utilizes in vitro studies to demonstrate equivalence of in vitro performance, pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic studies to demonstrate equivalence of systemic exposure, and pharmacodynamic and clinical endpoint studies to demonstrate equivalence in local action. This review discusses key aspects of in vitro studies in supporting the establishment of BE for generic locally acting DPI products. These aspects include comparability in device resistance and equivalence in in vitro testing for single inhalation (actuation) content and aerodynamic particle size distribution.

Product Quality Research Institute evaluation of cascade impactor profiles of pharmaceutical aerosols: part 2--evaluation of a method for determining equivalence.

The purpose of this article is to present the thought process, methods, and interim results of a PQRI Working Group, which was charged with evaluating the chi-square ratio test as a potential method for determining in vitro equivalence of aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) profiles obtained from cascade impactor measurements. Because this test was designed with the intention of being used as a tool in regulatory review of drug applications, the capability of the test to detect differences in APSD profiles correctly and consistently was evaluated in a systematic way across a designed space of possible profiles. To establish a "base line," properties of the test in the simplest case of pairs of identical profiles were studied. Next, the test's performance was studied with pairs of profiles, where some difference was simulated in a systematic way on a single deposition site using realistic product profiles. The results obtained in these studies, which are presented in detail here, suggest that the chi-square ratio test in itself is not sufficient to determine equivalence of particle size distributions. This article, therefore, introduces the proposal to combine the chi-square ratio test with a test for impactor-sized mass based on Population Bioequivalence and describes methods for evaluating discrimination capabilities of the combined test. The approaches and results described in this article elucidate some of the capabilities and limitations of the original chi-square ratio test and provide rationale for development of additional tests capable of comparing APSD profiles of pharmaceutical aerosols.

Product Quality Research Institute evaluation of cascade impactor profiles of pharmaceutical aerosols, part 1: background for a statistical method.

The purpose of this article is 2-fold: (1) to document in the public domain the considerations that led to the development of a regulatory statistical test for comparison of aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) of aerosolized drug formulations, which was proposed in a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) draft guidance for industry; and (2) to explain the background and process for evaluation of that test through a working group involving scientists from the FDA, industry, academia, and the US Pharmacopeia, under the umbrella of the Product Quality Research Institute (PQRI). The article and the referenced additional statistical information posted on the PQRI Web site explain the reasoning and methods used in the development of the APSD test, which is one of the key tests required for demonstrating in vitro equivalence of orally inhaled and nasal aerosol drug products. The article also describes the process by which stakeholders with different perspectives have worked collaboratively to evaluate properties of the test by drawing on statistical models, historical and practical information, and scientific reasoning. Overall, this article provides background information to accompany the companion article's discussion of the study's methods and results.

Raman chemical imaging for ingredient-specific particle size characterization of aqueous suspension nasal spray formulations: a progress report.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of using Raman chemical imaging (i.e., Raman imaging microspectroscopy) to establish chemical identity, particle size and particle size distribution (PSD) for a representative corticosteroid in aqueous nasal spray suspension formulations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Raman imaging PSD protocol was validated using polystyrene (PS) microsphere size standards (NIST-traceable). A Raman spectral library was developed for the active and inactive compounds in the formulation. Four nasal sprays formulated with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) ranging in size from 1.4 to 8.3 microm were imaged by both Raman and brightfield techniques. The Raman images were then processed to calculate the PSD for each formulation. RESULTS: Within each region examined, active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) particles are unambiguously identified and the total number of those particles, particle size and PSD of API free of excipients and PSD of API particles adhered to other excipients are reported. CONCLUSIONS: Good statistical agreement is obtained between the reported and measured sizes of the PS microspheres. BDP particles were clearly distinguishable from those of excipients. Raman chemical imaging (RCI) is able to differentiate between and identify the chemical makeup of multiple components in complex BDP sample and placebo mixtures. The Raman chemical imaging method (coupled Raman and optical imaging) shows promise as a method for characterizing particle size and shape of corticosteroid in aqueous nasal spray suspension formulations. However, rigorous validation of RCI for PSD analysis is incomplete and requires additional research effort. Some specific areas of concern are discussed.

A methacholine challenge dose-response study for development of a pharmacodynamic bioequivalence methodology for albuterol metered- dose inhalers.

BACKGROUND: With the expiration of the patent on albuterol metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) in 1989, methods to assess in vivo bioequivalence of generic formulations required investigation. OBJECTIVE: In an effort to develop a sensitive method to document bioequivalence, bronchoprovocation with methacholine chloride was used to assess the dose-response relationship of albuterol as delivered by MDI. Sensitivity was assessed in terms of magnitudes of ED(50), the estimated albuterol dose required to achieve 50 % of the fitted maximal value of the pharmacodynamic effect above baseline, and change in response as a function of dose, with emphasis on 1 and 2 actuations. METHODS: On separate study days, 15 nonsmokers with mild asthma received randomized nominal albuterol doses of 0 to 576 microg by using specially manufactured MDI canisters. FEV(1) was measured 15 minutes after MDI dosing. Serially increasing doses of methacholine were administered, and FEV(1) was measured after each methacholine dose until a 20 % decrease in FEV(1) (PD(20)) was achieved. RESULTS: Mean PD(20) values after use of each of the albuterol-containing MDIs were significantly greater than either mean screening or mean placebo PD(20) values (P <.05). Mean responses and most individual subject responses to 1 and 2 actuations (90 and 180 microg) of albuterol MDI were within the sensitive region of the dose- response curve. The mean estimated ED(50) value on the basis of nonlinear mixed effect modeling was 119.2 microg (range, 33.3-337.1 microg), with an intersubject percentage coefficient of variation of 69.0 %. CONCLUSIONS: The methacholine bronchoprovocation model is safe and useful in the study of albuterol MDI dose-response in asthmatic subjects. Bronchoprovocation studies may be used for determination of bioequivalence of multisource albuterol MDI products.

Content uniformity and dose uniformity: current approaches, statistical analyses, and presentation of an alternative approach, with special reference to oral inhalation and nasal drug products.

This article reviews current and proposed approaches to content uniformity testing. In addition, the article proposes an approach that allows regulatory agencies and compendia to clearly state allowable consumer risk. Further, the article suggests that producers be allowed to control producer risk through selection of numbers of units and testing tiers. The approach facilitates risk communication to practitioners and patients/consumers, which is impeded with current approaches, and reduces regulatory and compendial burden.