Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Language
Publication year range
1.
Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports ; 46: 100939, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37935540

ABSTRACT

Neospora caninum, Toxoplasma gondii and Brucella melitensis are pathogens that cause abortion in small ruminants. Besides, B. melitensis and T. gondii are zoonotic pathogens. The aim of this study was to describe the frequency of antibodies against N. caninum, T. gondii and B. melitensis in sheep and goats from three provinces of the center region of Argentina. In addition, the spatial distribution of the infected flocks/herds and risk factors were evaluated. A cross-sectional study was conducted from 2015 through 2016. Serum samples from 4783 goats and 1524 sheep from 186 goat, 51 sheep and 38 mixed flocks/herds were analyzed. Competitive inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ciELISA) and indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) were performed for detection of antibodies against N. caninum and IFAT for T. gondii. The buffered plate antigen test and complement fixation test were performed for detection of antibodies against B. melitensis. The frequency of anti-T. gondii antibodies was 41.2% and 29.7% for sheep and goats, respectively. The frequency of anti-N. caninum antibodies was 17.2% and 14% for sheep and goats, respectively. About 97.1% of the sheep flocks, 79.4% of the goat herds and the 91.3% of the mixed flocks had seropositive animals to T. gondii. About 61.8% of the sheep flocks, 58% of the goat herds and the 82.6% of the mixed flocks had seropositive animals to N. caninum. All the analyzed animals were negative to anti-B. melitensis antibodies. For T. gondii, a significant cluster of high risk of seropositive flocks/herds was detected in the littoral of the Parana River. The province of origin of the flock/herd was the only variable associated to T. gondii positivity (p = 0.003). Animals from Santiago del Estero and Santa Fe Provinces had 3.48 and 1.77 times more risk to be positive to T. gondii than animals from Entre Ríos Province, respectively. For N. caninum, a cluster of high risk of seropositive flocks/herds was detected in the north of Santa Fe Province. The only explanatory variable associated to N. caninum positivity was animal species (p = 0.003). Sheep had 1.73 times more risk to be positive to N. caninum than goats. The absence of antibodies against B. melitensis in all the analyzed animals is an important finding for the public health of the region. Since bordering provinces have infected flocks/herds, brucellosis in small ruminants should be under epidemiologic surveillance in the region.


Subject(s)
Brucella melitensis , Coccidiosis , Goat Diseases , Neospora , Sheep Diseases , Toxoplasma , Toxoplasmosis, Animal , Sheep , Animals , Goats , Argentina/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Antibodies, Protozoan , Coccidiosis/epidemiology , Coccidiosis/veterinary , Sheep Diseases/epidemiology , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Toxoplasmosis, Animal/epidemiology , Ruminants , Risk Factors , Goat Diseases/epidemiology
2.
Ciênc. rural (Online) ; 51(11): e20200959, 2021. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS, VETINDEX | ID: biblio-1278887

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: The fluorescence polarization assay (FPA), two variants (V) of the indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA) and the competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (C-ELISA) were evaluated in buffaloes to detect antibodies against Brucella spp. The V1 of I-ELISA identifies them through the monoclonal (M23) anti-bovine IgG (I-ELISAM23) and the V2 through the ProteinA / G (I-ELISA-A/G). Serum samples of 862 buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) from the Northeast of Argentina (NEA) were analyzed using the complement fixation test (CFT) as the reference. Receiving Operator Characteristic (ROC) analysis defined for the area under the curve (AUC) determined the cutoff points, sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) for each test. CFT identified 107 positive and 755 negative sera. The best AUC (0.986), Concordance with CFT (96.3%) and kappa value (0.843) was obtained by I-ELISA A/G test. This assay showed the highest Se (95.33%) and C-ELISA the highest Sp (97%). FPA failed to measure the antibodies in 23 (2.65%) serum samples due to unsuccessful reading. I-ELISA M23 proved to be ineffective to diagnose brucellosis in bubaline sera. The four serological tests showed cutoff points lower than those standardized for bovines. As conclusion, I-ELISA A/G, C-ELISA and FPA with its limitations would be effective techniques for the diagnosis of brucellosis in buffaloes in the NEA, requiring an appropriate cut-off point to guarantee their maximum performance in this species.


RESUMO: O ensaio de polarização de fluorescência (FPA), duas variantes (V) do ensaio imunoenzimático indireto (I-ELISA) e o ensaio imunoenzimático competitivo (C-ELISA), foram avaliados em búfalos para detectar anticorpos contra Brucella spp. O V1 do I-ELISA os identifica através do IgG monoclonal (M23) anti-bovino (I-ELISAM23) e o V2 ​​através da Proteína A / G (I-ELISA-A / G). Amostras de soro de 862 búfalos (Bubalus bubalis) do Nordeste da Argentina (NEA) foram analisadas usando o teste de fixação do complemento (CFT) como referência. A análise Receiving Operator Characteristic (ROC) definida pela área sob a curva (AUC) determinou os pontos de corte, sensibilidade (Se) e especificidade (Sp) de cada teste. A CFT identificou 107 soros positivos e 755 soros negativos. Os melhores valores de AUC (0.986), concordância com CFT (96.3%) e kappa (0.843) foram obtidos pelo teste I-ELISA A / G. Este ensaio mostrou a maior Se (95.33%) e C-ELISA a maior Sp (97%). O FPA falhou em medir os anticorpos em 23 (2,65%) amostras de soro devido à falha na leitura. O I-ELISA M23 provou ser ineficaz para o diagnóstico de brucelose em soros bubalinos. Os quatro testes sorológicos mostraram pontos de corte inferiores aos padronizados para bovinos. Em conclusão, I-ELISA A / G, C-ELISA e FPA com suas limitações seriam técnicas eficazes para o diagnóstico de brucelose em búfalos no NEA, exigindo um ponto de corte adequado para garantir seu desempenho máximo nesta espécie.

3.
Ciênc. rural (Online) ; 51(11): 1-9, 2021. graf, tab
Article in English | VETINDEX | ID: biblio-1480245

ABSTRACT

The fluorescence polarization assay (FPA), two variants (V) of the indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA) and the competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (C-ELISA) were evaluated in buffaloes to detect antibodies against Brucella spp. The V1 of I-ELISA identifies them through the monoclonal (M23) anti-bovine IgG (I-ELISAM23) and the V2 through the ProteinA / G (I-ELISA-A/G). Serum samples of 862 buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) from the Northeast of Argentina (NEA) were analyzed using the complement fixation test (CFT) as the reference. Receiving Operator Characteristic (ROC) analysis defined for the area under the curve (AUC) determined the cutoff points, sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) for each test. CFT identified 107 positive and 755 negative sera. The best AUC (0.986), Concordance with CFT (96.3%) and kappa value (0.843) was obtained by I-ELISA A/G test. This assay showed the highest Se (95.33%) and C-ELISA the highest Sp (97%). FPA failed to measure the antibodies in 23 (2.65%) serum samples due to unsuccessful reading. I-ELISA M23 proved to be ineffective to diagnose brucellosis in bubaline sera. The four serological tests showed cutoff points lower than those standardized for bovines. As conclusion, I-ELISA A/G, C-ELISA and FPA with its limitations would be effective techniques for the diagnosis of brucellosis in buffaloes in the NEA, requiring an appropriate cut-off point to guarantee their maximum performance in this species.


O ensaio de polarização de fluorescência (FPA), duas variantes (V) do ensaio imunoenzimático indireto (I-ELISA) e o ensaio imunoenzimático competitivo (C-ELISA), foram avaliados em búfalos para detectar anticorpos contra Brucella spp. O V1 do I-ELISA os identifica através do IgG monoclonal (M23) anti-bovino (I-ELISAM23) e o V2 ​​através da Proteína A / G (I-ELISA-A / G). Amostras de soro de 862 búfalos (Bubalus bubalis) do Nordeste da Argentina (NEA) foram analisadas usando o teste de fixação do complemento (CFT) como referência. A análise Receiving Operator Characteristic (ROC) definida pela área sob a curva (AUC) determinou os pontos de corte, sensibilidade (Se) e especificidade (Sp) de cada teste. A CFT identificou 107 soros positivos e 755 soros negativos. Os melhores valores de AUC (0.986), concordância com CFT (96.3%) e kappa (0.843) foram obtidos pelo teste I-ELISA A / G. Este ensaio mostrou a maior Se (95.33%) e C-ELISA a maior Sp (97%). O FPA falhou em medir os anticorpos em 23 (2,65%) amostras de soro devido à falha na leitura. O I-ELISA M23 provou ser ineficaz para o diagnóstico de brucelose em soros bubalinos. Os quatro testes sorológicos mostraram pontos de corte inferiores aos padronizados para bovinos. Em conclusão, I-ELISA A / G, C-ELISA e FPA com suas limitações seriam técnicas eficazes para o diagnóstico de brucelose em búfalos no NEA, exigindo um ponto de corte adequado para garantir seu desempenho máximo nesta espécie.


Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Brucellosis/diagnosis , Brucellosis/blood , Brucellosis/veterinary , Buffaloes/microbiology
4.
Ci. Rural ; 51(11): 1-9, 2021. graf, tab
Article in English | VETINDEX | ID: vti-32172

ABSTRACT

The fluorescence polarization assay (FPA), two variants (V) of the indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA) and the competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (C-ELISA) were evaluated in buffaloes to detect antibodies against Brucella spp. The V1 of I-ELISA identifies them through the monoclonal (M23) anti-bovine IgG (I-ELISAM23) and the V2 through the ProteinA / G (I-ELISA-A/G). Serum samples of 862 buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) from the Northeast of Argentina (NEA) were analyzed using the complement fixation test (CFT) as the reference. Receiving Operator Characteristic (ROC) analysis defined for the area under the curve (AUC) determined the cutoff points, sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) for each test. CFT identified 107 positive and 755 negative sera. The best AUC (0.986), Concordance with CFT (96.3%) and kappa value (0.843) was obtained by I-ELISA A/G test. This assay showed the highest Se (95.33%) and C-ELISA the highest Sp (97%). FPA failed to measure the antibodies in 23 (2.65%) serum samples due to unsuccessful reading. I-ELISA M23 proved to be ineffective to diagnose brucellosis in bubaline sera. The four serological tests showed cutoff points lower than those standardized for bovines. As conclusion, I-ELISA A/G, C-ELISA and FPA with its limitations would be effective techniques for the diagnosis of brucellosis in buffaloes in the NEA, requiring an appropriate cut-off point to guarantee their maximum performance in this species.(AU)


O ensaio de polarização de fluorescência (FPA), duas variantes (V) do ensaio imunoenzimático indireto (I-ELISA) e o ensaio imunoenzimático competitivo (C-ELISA), foram avaliados em búfalos para detectar anticorpos contra Brucella spp. O V1 do I-ELISA os identifica através do IgG monoclonal (M23) anti-bovino (I-ELISAM23) e o V2 ​​através da Proteína A / G (I-ELISA-A / G). Amostras de soro de 862 búfalos (Bubalus bubalis) do Nordeste da Argentina (NEA) foram analisadas usando o teste de fixação do complemento (CFT) como referência. A análise Receiving Operator Characteristic (ROC) definida pela área sob a curva (AUC) determinou os pontos de corte, sensibilidade (Se) e especificidade (Sp) de cada teste. A CFT identificou 107 soros positivos e 755 soros negativos. Os melhores valores de AUC (0.986), concordância com CFT (96.3%) e kappa (0.843) foram obtidos pelo teste I-ELISA A / G. Este ensaio mostrou a maior Se (95.33%) e C-ELISA a maior Sp (97%). O FPA falhou em medir os anticorpos em 23 (2,65%) amostras de soro devido à falha na leitura. O I-ELISA M23 provou ser ineficaz para o diagnóstico de brucelose em soros bubalinos. Os quatro testes sorológicos mostraram pontos de corte inferiores aos padronizados para bovinos. Em conclusão, I-ELISA A / G, C-ELISA e FPA com suas limitações seriam técnicas eficazes para o diagnóstico de brucelose em búfalos no NEA, exigindo um ponto de corte adequado para garantir seu desempenho máximo nesta espécie.(AU)


Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Buffaloes/microbiology , Brucellosis/blood , Brucellosis/diagnosis , Brucellosis/veterinary
5.
Vet Microbiol ; 106(3-4): 287-92, 2005 Apr 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15778035

ABSTRACT

An indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA) for diagnosis of anaplasmosis using undiluted individual milk samples from dairy cows was developed. The recombinant 19 kDa major surface protein 5 (rMSP5) of Anaplasma marginale was used as antigen. A monoclonal antibody against bovine IgG1 conjugated with peroxidase and the chromogen 3,5,3',5'-tetramethylbenzidine were used in the test. Strong and weak, positive and negative milk samples were set up as reference controls. Results were expressed as percentage of positivity (PP) contrasting with the strongest positive control. The test was evaluated in two groups (G1 and G2) of lactating dairy cows from herds located in A. marginale non-endemic areas of Argentina. The infection status of both groups, G1 (n=128) sampled after anaplasmosis outbreak, and G2 (n=216) free of anaplasmosis was established by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Serum samples of cows from G1 and G2 were analyzed by card agglutination test (CAT) and competitive ELISA (cELISA), while the novel iELISA was evaluated in their corresponding milk samples. At a cutoff of 42 PP, the ELISA has 98% sensitivity and 95% specificity. A significant difference (P<0.0001) was found between the mean PP value of negative samples from G1 (17.4+/-14.9), and G2 (8.6+/-7.1). The agreement and kappa (kappa) value between iELISA and PCR was 96%, kappa=0.919; between iELISA and CAT was 97%, kappa=0.880; and between iELISA and cELISA was 97%, kappa=0.899. These results strongly support the usefulness of iELISA to detect A. marginale antibodies in milk. Additional studies are necessary to define the ability of the milk iELISA to detect not only acutely infected, but also carrier cattle.


Subject(s)
Anaplasma marginale/immunology , Anaplasmosis/diagnosis , Antibodies, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Cattle Diseases/diagnosis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Milk/immunology , Agglutination Tests/veterinary , Anaplasmosis/microbiology , Animals , Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins/immunology , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/microbiology , Electrophoresis, Agar Gel/veterinary , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Female , Milk/microbiology , Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , ROC Curve , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL