Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on transplant laboratories: How to mitigate?

A positive flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) due to donor specific antibodies (DSA) constitutes a risk for kidney transplantation; such a finding may indicates an unacceptable donor for this patient. However, positive FCXM in the absence of DSA is considered discordant and need further investigations. During COVID-19 pandemic, we observed 22% discordant results out of 445 FCXM performed during eight months period in our laboratory and another 7% were invalid due to high background negative control (NC). No study has addressed the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on FCXM and the overall pre-kidney transplant workups or described a solution to deal with these non-specific reactivities. Herein, we analyzed all FCXM results in SARS-CoV-2 seropositive patients and addressed how this pandemic affected significantly the pre-kidney transplant workups, highlighting both technical and financial implications. We also shared our modified FCXM procedures using dithiotheritol (DTT) sera treatment or blocking donor cells with negative control human serum (NCS) which we found to be successful to abrogate 98% of all discordant FCXM results and to validate all invalid results due to high background NC. In conclusion, COVID-19 pandemic has affected our HLA laboratory significantly by creating many false positive or invalid crossmatch results. Transplant laboratories must consider this before test interpretations and immune risk assessments. We recommend the use of DTT serum treatment to remove nonspecific bindings in the sera of kidney transplant candidates and the use of NCS-blocked donor cells to correct high background when performing FCXM in transplant candidates or donors with recent history of SARS-CoV-2 immunization respectively.

HLA Sensitization in the Era of COVID-19: Single-Center Experience.

It is well known that several viral infections are capable of triggering the formation of HLA antibodies; however, an association between SARS-CoV-2 and the development of anti-HLA antibodies is not yet confirmed. In this study, we compared the prevalence of HLA antibody before and after COVID-19 infection in a cohort of 3 groups included 58 healthy nonsensitized employees (HNEs), 130 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), and 62 kidney transplant candidates. There were no significant changes observed in HLA class I antibodies in any of the groups, but evaluation of antibodies to HLA class II revealed a significant change in the KTR group (P = .0184) after acquiring COVID-19 infection and in the HNE group (P = .0043) when compared to the reported prevalence in a similar population. Although we observed the emergence of convalescent de novo donor-specific antibodies in 2 patients, we did not encounter any rejection episodes in the KTR group. Finally, the results of flow cytometry crossmatch in the HNE group were not consistent with the state of antibodies. In conclusion, COVID-19 infection has the potential to produce class II antibodies but with little effect on preexisting sensitization. These antibodies are likely to be transient and not necessarily causing positive crossmatch with the corresponding antigens at the proper mean fluorescent intensity and therefore should not affect access to transplantation. There is a need for further evaluation to ascertain the genuineness of these antibodies and their exact effect on transplant readiness and outcomes.