[Failure mode effect analysis for safety improvement in the automatic drug dispensing systems]. / Aplicación de un análisis modal de fallos y efectos para la mejora de la seguridad en la utilización de los sistemas automatizados de dispensación de medicamentos.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the risks in automated dispensing cabinet use in order to improve routine procedure safety. METHODS: We used the Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) methodology. A multidisciplinary team identified potential failure modes of the procedure through a brainstorming session. We assessed the impact associated with each failure mode with the Risk Priority Number (RPN), which involves three variables: occurrence, severity, and detectability. Improvement measures were established for failure modes with RPN>100 considered critical. The final RPN (theoretical) that would result from the proposed measures was also calculated. RESULTS: The process was divided into five sub-processes: automatic delivery of order replacement, to prepare order in a pyramidal cart, transport of the pyramidal cart from the pharmacy service to the automated dispensing cabinet, replacement of the automated dispensing cabinet by the pharmacy technician and dispensing/returning by nursing staff. Twenty-two failure modes, with 25 cases and with varying effects (severity 2-8) were evaluated. The sub-process with more failure modes with NPR>100 was dispensing/returning by nursing staff. CONCLUSIONS: The FMEA methodology was a useful tool when applied to automated dispensing cabinet system use. The implementation of improvement actions significantly reduced the risk.

Impact of medication reconciliation on health outcomes: An overview of systematic reviews.

BACKGROUND: Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that medication reconciliation (MR) is effective in decreasing the risk of medication discrepancies. Nevertheless, the association between MR and subsequent improved healthcare outcomes is not well established. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review of reviews set out to identify published systematic reviews on the impact of MR programs on health outcomes and to describe key components of the intervention, the health outcomes assessed and any associations between MR and health outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and SCOPUS were searched from inception to May 2019. Systematic reviews of all study designs, populations, intervention providers and settings that measured patient-related outcomes or healthcare utilization were considered. Methodological quality was assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2). Two investigators performed study selection, quality assessment and data collection independently. RESULTS: Five systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria: 2 were rated as low quality and 3 as critically low quality. Reviews included primary studies in different settings (hospitals, the community and residential aged care facilities) that reported the impact of MR on mortality, length of stay, Emergency Department (ED) visits, readmissions, physician visits and healthcare utilization. Only one review reported results on mortality. However, healthcare utilization, which usually included ED visits and readmissions, was communicated in all reviews. Meta-analyses were conducted in all reviews except one. Medication reconciliation was not consistently found to be associated with improvements in health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Few systematic reviews support the value of MR in achieving good patient-related outcomes and healthcare utilization improvements. The quality of the systematic reviews was low and the primary studies included commonly involved additional activities related to MR. There was no clear evidence in favor of intervention in mortality, length of stay, ED visits, unplanned readmissions, physician visits and healthcare utilization.

Respuesta: Comentarios sobre la herramienta web Anticholinergic Burden Calculator / Reply: Comments on the Anticholinergic Burden Calculator Web Tool

No disponible

Factors related with the appropriateness of pharmacological treatment in polypathological patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between the number of pharmacological inappropriateness and possible factors related with it. METHODS: All polyphatological patients of the IMPACTO project in a tertiary hospital were included (July 2010-March 2012). The pharmacist performed the interventions based on a combined strategy that included the modified MAI and the STOPP-START criteria. A greater number of interventions indicated smaller treatment appropriateness. In the analysis of the strength of association between two continuous variables the Pearson correlation coefficient was used. Test of Student's t or Mann-Whitney comparisons of quantitative data between two groups were applied. Subsequently, a multivariate analysis was performed to study possible variables which explain the inappropriateness of the pharmacological treatment. RESULTS: 242 patients were included. 838 inappropriateness were detected (average per patient of 3±2). The appropriateness was associated with: number of diagnoses, medications, and categories of polypathology, Charlson Comorbidity Index, sex, and categories A1 and B2. When diagnosing collinearity in the multivariate model, we observed that there was collinearity between "Charlson Comorbidity Index" and "number of categories of polypathological patients", so it was decided to conduct two multivariate models variables, one each. The number of drugs, the number of diagnoses and the gender remained significant in both multivariate models. CONCLUSIONS: The appropriateness of pharmacological treatment decreases with increasing number of drugs and number of diagnoses, as well as female gender. However, both multi variate models explain a low percentage of variability in the number of inappropriateness.

Objetivo: evaluar la asociación entre el número de inadecuaciones farmacológicas y posibles factores relacionados con la misma. Métodos: : Se incluyeron todos los pacientes pluripatológicos del proyecto IMPACTO en un hospital de tercer nivel (Julio 2010-Marzo 2012). El farmacéutico realizó las intervenciones en base a una estrategia combinada que incluía el MAI modificado y los criterios STOPP-START. A mayor número de intervenciones menor adecuación del tratamiento. En los análisis de la fuerza de asociación entre dos variables continuas se utilizó el coeficiente de correlación de Pearson. Se aplicó el test de la t de Student o U de Mann-Whitney en comparaciones de datos cuantitativos entre dos grupos. Posteriormente, se realizó un análisis multivariante, para estudiar posibles variables que explicasen las inadecuaciones del tratamiento farmacológico. Resultados: Se incluyeron un total de 242 pacientes. Se detectaron un total de 838 inadecuaciones, siendo la media por paciente de 3±2. La adecuación del tratamiento farmacológico se asoció con el número de diagnósticos, el número de medicamentos, el número de categorías de paciente pluripatológico, el índice de comorbilidad de Charlson, el sexo y las categorías A1 y B2. Al realizar el diagnóstico de colinealidad, en el modelo multivariante, de las variables se observó que existía colinealidad entre las variables "índice de comorbilidad de Charlson" y "número de categorías de paciente pluripatológico", por lo que se decidió realizar dos modelos multivariantes, uno con cada una de ellas. Se mantuvieron significativos con el multivariante y para ambos modelos el número de medicamentos, el número de diagnósticos y el sexo. Conclusiones: La adecuación del tratamiento farmacológico disminuyó al aumentar el número de medicamentos y el número de diagnósticos, así como en mujeres. No obstante, ambos modelos multivariantes, explicaron un porcentaje de variabilidad del número de inadecuaciones leve.

Assessment of new drugs in a tertiary hospital using a standardized tool.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the profile of new drugs evaluated by the Pharmacy and Therapeutics committee in a tertiary hospital using a standardized tool, the Guideline for the Introduction of New Drugs in the Formulary (GINF form), as main objective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study of drugs was assessed during 2008-2011. Variables related to the drug, the request, and the result of the evaluation were collected based on information contained in the GINF form and in the assessment reports. RESULTS: 63 of 75 assessed drugs (84%) were included in the hospital formulary. Only one drug (1%) was included without any restrictions. The rest of them were included as therapeutic equivalents (23%) or under specific recommendations (61%). Half of the drugs (6) not included had insufficient evidence of effectiveness compared with current treatments. Haematology and Medical Oncology were found to be the most active medical services in the application process. There was a high prevalence of drugs that had more than one advanced clinical trial (phase III and/or phase IV). Furthermore, 28% of assessed drugs were associated with a financial burden of more than ?10,000 per year for our hospital. Highquality information was provided by applicants to the P&T committee for drugs that were finally included. However, the relationship between the information provided to the P&T committee and its decision was not statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The requests received were primarily related to drugs intended for parenteral use and most of them were antineoplastic drugs. The medical departments most heavily represented were Haematology and Oncology.

Objetivo: Describir las características de los nuevos fármacos evaluados por la Comisión de Farmacia y Terapéutica (CFyT) en un hospital terciario mediante el empleo de una herramienta normalizada, la Guía para la valoración de Inclusión de Nuevos Fármacos, como objetivo principal. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de aquellos fármacos evaluados en el periodo 2008-11. Fueron recogidas variables relativas al fármaco, a la solicitud y al resultado final de la evaluación mediante la información contenida en las guías GINF y en los informes finales de evaluación. Resultados: De los 75 medicamentos evaluados, 63 (84%) fueron incluidos en la Guía Farmacoterapéutica del Hospital. Únicamente 1 (1,3%) lo fue sin ningún tipo de restricción. El resto fueron incluidos como equivalentes terapéuticos (21,3%) o bajo recomendaciones específicas (61,3%). La mitad de los fármacos no incluidos (6) presentaban insuficiente evidencia respecto a su eficacia frente a los tratamientos habituales. Hematología y Oncología Médica se encontraron entre los servicios médicos más activos en la solicitud. Se observó un alto porcentaje de fármacos que disponían de más de un ensayo clínico en fase avanzada (III y/o IV). Por otra parte, el 28% de los fármacos evaluados se relacionaron con un impacto financiero superior 10.000 ??anuales. Las guías GINF proporcionadas por los solicitantes a la CFyT se caracterizaron por la alta calidad de la información contenida en ellas. Sin embargo, la relación entre la información proporcionada a la CFyT y la decisión final de la misma no fue estadísticamente significativa. Conclusiones: Las solicitudes recibidas pertenecieron principalmente a fármacos de administración parenteral, siendo la mayor parte de ellos antineoplásicos. Los servicios médicos más intensamente representados fueron Hematología y Oncología.

[Visa at a tertiary hospital]. / El visado en un hospital de tercer nivel.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the visa application process and his activity at a tertiary hosipital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive study of the drug s visa activity during the period April 2011-April 2012. We designed a database and defined categories on the study variables: patients and recipes. For patients admitted to the Visa Unit, issues detected were recorded based on a previously established classification. RESULTS: 6738 patients were included. They involved the visa of 8,465 recipes. The visa was applied to 170 drugs and nutrition products different, being the majority Tacrolimus. During this period, we detected a total of 420 incidents being the most frequent «No clinical document¼ (46.67%) and the «Formal completion errors¼ (28.57%). CONCLUSIONS: This work has allowed a more detailed analysis of the activity, the types of incidents and the identification of areas for improvement.

Objetivo: Analizar el procedimiento de visado y su actividad en un hospital de tercer nivel. Material y métodos: Estudio descriptivo del procedimiento de visado durante el período abril 2011-abril 2012. Se diseñó una base de datos y se definieron categorías relativas a las variables de estudio: pacientes y recetas. Para los pacientes atendidos en la Unidad de Visado se registraron las incidencias detectadas en base a una clasificación previamente establecida. Resultados: Se incluyeron 6.738 pacientes (8.465 recetas visadas). Se visaron 170 medicamentos y productos de nutrición diferentes, siendo el mayoritario Tacrolimus. Se detectaron un total de 420 incidencias, siendo las más frecuentes la «Ausencia de documento clínico¼ (46,67 %) y los «Errores formales de cumplimentación¼ (28,57%). Conclusiones: El presente trabajo ha permitido un conocimiento más pormenorizado de la actividad, los tipos de incidencias y la identificación de áreas de mejora.

[Health care models for patients with multiple chronic conditions and the role of the hospital pharmacy/the hospital pharmacist]. / Modelos de atención al paciente pluripatológico y el papel de la farmacia hospitalaria.

INTRODUCTION: Managing care for patients with chronic conditions currently represents one of the greatest challenges to health care systems. As a subgroup of these patients, those with multiple chronic conditions are at greater risk for death or disability, and they consume more resources. They are characterized by the coexistence of two or more chronic illnesses lasting a year or longer which require ongoing medical attention and/or interfere with their daily activities. For these polypathological patients pharmaceutical care would be of special benefit, thus, their needs should be a priority objective for hospital pharmacy. OBJECTIVE: To increase awareness of this type of patients and the characteristics of the principal approaches and health care models proposed to improve chronic disease management, as well as to emphasize the urgency for hospital pharmacists to join these models, and to present various activities that pharmacists might carry out as an integral part of these approaches. RESULTS: Numerous models exist internationally, including the Chronic Care Model and the Kaiser Permanente pyramid of risks. In our country a growing number of initiatives has culminated in the recent Seville Declaration. For the hospital pharmacy, caring for the chronically ill patient following a model that is multi-professional, cooperative, integral, and patient centered, is an enormous task. Pharmacy departments and the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy should reorient their strategies for pharmaceutical care, training, and research. Of special interest are those activities designed to improve adherence, adequacy, and continuity in treatments, all the while emphasizing active patient participation.

[Analysis of the selection process for new drugs in a tertiary hospital 2004-2007]. / Análisis del proceso de selección de nuevos medicamentos en un hospital terciario. Años 2004-07.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to describe the structure of the CFyT, the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee, and a tertiary hospital's selection process for new drugs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All annals of the P&TC and the New Drug Incorporation Guides (GINF) to incorporate new drugs received at Hospital Virgen del Rocío between 2004 and 2007 were reviewed. We carried out a descriptive study which collected variables having to do with the drug (drug type, type of register, route of administration and legal category), the petitioner (responsible division, professional category and request type) and the result of the evaluation (final decision, elapsed time between the request and the decision). RESULTS: Of the 72 requested drugs, 45 (62.5%) were approved: six as equivalent treatments, 36 (80%) with specific recommendations, and three (4.2%) with no restrictions. Twelve drugs (81.1%) were not included due to insufficient evidence of their effectiveness compared with the current treatment. The most frequently-requested drug type was the antineoplastics, most commonly requested by Oncology and Haematology divisions. We highlight the fact that many of the petitioners included clinical trials (97.2%) and data referring to costs (84.7%). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high level of compliance with the GINF guide in our centre, which guarantees that the P&TC's final decision is based on scientific evidence.