Investigations of cardiac fibrosis rheology by in vitro cardiac tissue modeling with 3D cellular spheroids.

Cardiac fibrosis refers to the abnormal accumulation of extracellular matrix within the cardiac muscle, leading to increased stiffness and impaired heart function. From a rheological standpoint, knowledge about myocardial behavior is still lacking, partially due to a lack of appropriate techniques to investigate the rheology of in vitro cardiac tissue models. 3D multicellular cardiac spheroids are powerful and versatile platforms for modeling healthy and fibrotic cardiac tissue in vitro and studying how their mechanical properties are modulated. In this study, cardiac spheroids were created by co-culturing neonatal rat ventricular cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts in definite ratios using the hanging-drop method. The rheological characterization of such models was performed by Atomic Force Microscopy-based stress-relaxation measurements on the whole spheroid. After strain application, a viscoelastic bi-exponential relaxation was observed, characterized by a fast relaxation time (τ1) followed by a slower one (τ2). In particular, spheroids with higher fibroblasts density showed reduction for both relaxation times comparing to control, with a more pronounced decrement of τ1 with respect to τ2. Such response was found compatible with the increased production of extracellular matrix within these spheroids, which recapitulates the main feature of the fibrosis pathophysiology. These results demonstrate how the rheological characteristics of cardiac tissue vary as a function of cellular composition and extracellular matrix, confirming the suitability of such system as an in vitro preclinical model of cardiac fibrosis.

The local mechanosensitive response of primary cardiac fibroblasts is influenced by the microenvironment mechanics.

Cardiac fibroblasts (CFs) are essential for preserving myocardial integrity and function. They can detect variations in cardiac tissue stiffness using various cellular mechanosensors, including the Ca2+ permeable mechanosensitive channel Piezo1. Nevertheless, how CFs adapt the mechanosensitive response to stiffness changes remains unclear. In this work we adopted a multimodal approach, combining the local mechanical stimulation (from 10 pN to 350 nN) with variations of culture substrate stiffness. We found that primary rat CFs cultured on stiff (GPa) substrates showed a broad Piezo1 distribution in the cell with particular accumulation at the mitochondria membrane. CFs displayed a force-dependent behavior in both calcium uptake and channel activation probability, showing a threshold at 300 nN, which involves both cytosolic and mitochondrial Ca2+ mobilization. This trend decreases as the myofibroblast phenotype within the cell population increases, following a possible Piezo1 accumulation at focal adhesion sites. In contrast, the inhibition of fibroblasts to myofibroblasts transition with soft substrates (kPa) considerably reduces both mechanically- and chemically-induced Piezo1 activation and expression. Our findings shed light on how Piezo1 function and expression are regulated by the substrate stiffness and highlight its involvement in the environment-mediated modulation of CFs mechanosensitivity.

Flagellar beating forces of human spermatozoa with different motility behaviors.

BACKGROUND: One of the causes of male infertility is associated with altered spermatozoa motility. These sperm features are frequently analyzed by image-based approaches, which, despite allowing the acquisition of crucial parameters to assess sperm motility, they are unable to provide details regarding the flagellar beating forces, which have been neglected until now. RESULTS: In this work we exploit Fluidic Force Microscopy to investigate and quantify the forces associated with the flagellar beating frequencies of human spermatozoa. The analysis is performed on two groups divided according to the progressive motility of semen samples, as identified by standard clinical protocols. In the first group, 100% of the spermatozoa swim linearly (100% progressive motility), while, in the other, spermatozoa show both linear and circular motility (identified as 80 - 20% progressive motility). Significant differences in flagellar beating forces between spermatozoa from semen sample with different progressive motility are observed. Particularly, linear motile spermatozoa exhibit forces higher than those with a circular movement. CONCLUSIONS: This research can increase our understanding of sperm motility and the role of mechanics in fertilization, which could help us unveil some of the causes of idiopathic male infertility.