Identification of serologic markers for school-aged children with congenital rubella syndrone

BACKGROUND: Congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) case identification is challenging in older children since laboratory markers of congenital rubella virus (RUBV) infection do not persist beyond age 12 months. METHODS: We enrolled children with CRS born between 1998 and 2003 and compared their immune responses to RUBV with those of their mothers and a group of similarly aged children without CRS. Demographic data and sera were collected. Sera were tested for anti-RUBV immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgG avidity, and IgG response to the 3 viral structural proteins (E1, E2, and C), reflected by immunoblot fluorescent signals. RESULTS: We enrolled 32 children with CRS, 31 mothers, and 62 children without CRS. The immunoblot signal strength to C and the ratio of the C signal to the RUBV-specific IgG concentration were higher (P < .029 for both) and the ratio of the E1 signal to the RUBV-specific IgG concentration lower (P = .001) in children with CRS, compared with their mothers. Compared with children without CRS, children with CRS had more RUBV-specific IgG (P < .001), a stronger C signal (P < .001), and a stronger E2 signal (P ≤ .001). Two classification rules for children with versus children without CRS gave 100% specificity with >65% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: This study was the first to establish classification rules for identifying CRS in school-aged children, using laboratory biomarkers. These biomarkers should allow improved burden of disease estimates and monitoring of CRS control programs. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2014. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.

Establishing a regional network of academic centers to support decision making for new vaccine introduction in Latin America and the Caribbean: the ProVac experience.

BACKGROUND: The Pan American Health Organization's ProVac Initiative, designed to strengthen national decision making regarding the introduction of new vaccines, was initiated in 2004. Central to realizing ProVac's vision of regional capacity building, the ProVac Network of Centers of Excellence (CoEs) was established in 2010 to provide research support to the ProVac Initiative, leveraging existing capacity at Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) universities. We describe the process of establishing the ProVac Network of CoEs and its initial outcomes and challenges. METHODS: A survey was sent to academic, not-for-profit institutions in LAC that had recently published work in the areas of clinical decision sciences and health economic analysis. Centers invited to join the Network were selected by an international committee on the basis of the survey results. Selection criteria included academic productivity in immunization-related work, team size and expertise, successful collaboration with governmental agencies and international organizations, and experience in training and education. The Network currently includes five academic institutions across LAC. RESULTS: Through open dialog and negotiation, specific projects were assigned to centers according to their areas of expertise. Collaboration among centers was highly encouraged. Faculty from ProVac's technical partners were assigned as focal points for each project. The resulting work led to the development and piloting of tools, methodological guides, and training materials that support countries in assessing existing evidence and generating new evidence on vaccine introduction. The evidence generated is shared with country-level decision makers and the scientific community. CONCLUSIONS: As the ProVac Initiative expands to other regions of the world with support from immunization and public health partners, the establishment of other regional and global networks of CoEs will be critical. The experience of LAC in creating the current network could benefit the formation of similar structures that support evidence-based decisions regarding new public health interventions.

Lessons from Cuba: mass campaign administration of trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine and seroprevalence of poliovirus neutralizing antibodies.

The immunogenicity of trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (TOPV), which is less effective in tropical than in temperate areas, may potentially be improved in several ways, including increasing the number of doses. Little information is available on TOPV when more than 6 doses are given. The situation in Cuba provides a unique opportunity to relate the seroprevalence of neutralizing antibodies to the dose of TOPV because Cuba has not reported culture-confirmed poliomyelitis since 1973 and TOPV is only administered in twice yearly 1-week mass immunization campaigns. Sera from 2000 children nationwide were studied for neutralizing antibody among children who received 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 doses of TOPV. These doses were administered in the period 1989-91, when TOPV (from the USSR) was being used with 500,000, 200,000, and 300,000 median tissue-culture-infecting doses (TCID50) for types 1, 2 and 3, respectively--the 5:2:3 formulation. Seroprevalence of neutralizing antibody after two TOPV doses was 91.5% for type 1, 90.8% for type 2, and 45.9% for type 3. Seroprevalence of type-3 neutralizing antibody after 6 doses remained low (73.4%), but increased to 83.5% after 8 doses (P < 0.05). Although 16.5% of the children remained unprotected for type-3 infection even after 8 doses, mass campaign immunization strategies were sufficient to eradicate the transmission of wild poliovirus in Cuba. Because the seroprevalence of type-1 neutralizing antibody was high (91.5%) after two campaign doses, additional studies using different formulations are needed to determine whether simultaneous improvement in the type-3 response to two campaign doses can be achieved.

PIP: During December 1991-January 1992 in Cuba, health workers took blood samples from a nationwide sample of 2000 children aged 0-3 who received 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 doses of trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (TOPV) to determine the seroprevalence of poliovirus neutralizing antibodies for types 1, 2, and 3. Specifically, researchers wanted to learn whether TOPV becomes more effective as the number of doses increases. Since 1973, Cuba has conducted two mass immunization campaigns each year in February and April. During 1970-91, Cuba used a USSR-produced poliovirus vaccine that had 500,000, 200,000, and 300,000 median tissue-culture-infecting doses for types 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Wild poliovirus has not been transmitted in Cuba since 1973 (as of August 1993), indicating that the mass immunization campaigns without routine vaccine delivery have eradicated poliomyelitis in Cuba. The seroprevalence of poliovirus neutralizing antibodies for type 1 increased significantly between 2 and 4 doses (91.5% vs. 96.5%; p = 0.05), thereafter the increases were small and insignificant. The seroprevalence of poliovirus neutralizing antibodies for type 2 increased significantly between 2 and 4 doses (90.8% vs. 97.2%), with small insignificant increases thereafter. Two doses of TOPV induced a response against poliovirus type 3 in only 45.9% of cases. At 4 doses and 8 doses, it did increase significantly from the previous dose (71.2% and 83.5%, respectively; p 0.05). Further studies using other vaccine formulations would allow persons involved in global eradication efforts to determine whether two campaign doses can improve the immunogenicity of the type 3 poliovirus while also improving that of the type 1 poliovirus.

Direct detection of wild poliovirus circulation by stool surveys of healthy children and analysis of community wastewater.

Cartagena, Colombia, was one of the last cities in the Americas known to have endemic poliomyelitis. After 3 cases were identified in 1991, two approaches for detecting continued silent transmission of wild polioviruses within a high-risk community were used: stool surveys of healthy children and virologic analysis of community sewage. Wild type 1 polioviruses were isolated from 8% of the children studied and from 21% of sewage samples. The proportions of wild polioviruses, vaccine-related polioviruses, and nonpolio enteric viruses were similar for both approaches. Wild poliovirus sequences were also amplified directly from processed sewage samples by the polymerase chain reaction using primer pairs specific for the indigenous type 1 genotype. The last reported cases associated with wild polioviruses in the Americas occurred in Colombia (8 April 1991) and Peru (23 August 1991). Direct sampling for wild polioviruses in high-risk communities can provide further evidence that eradication of the indigenous wild polioviruses has been achieved in the Americas.

Eradication of poliomyelitis: progress in the Americas.

In the span of 5 years since the eradication initiative was launched and only 3 years since external funds were made available, PAHO has been able to develop and implement a comprehensive program strategy for polio eradication that includes the following components: achievement and maintenance of high immunization levels (which include the supplemental strategies of national immunization days and mop-up operations); effective surveillance to detect all new cases; and a rapid response to the occurrence of new cases. Despite yearly increases in the number of cases of acute flaccid paralysis reported to the surveillance system, a decline in reported confirmed cases of polio has occurred since 1986 to record low levels in 1989. Cases in 1989 were reported from only 0.7% of the counties in the Americas. The occurrence of 24 wild-type virus isolates in 1989 were limited to only three geographic areas: northwestern Mexico; the northern Andean Region; and northeastern Brazil. At this writing the clock is ticking with only 3 months left to achieve the goal of interrupting transmission by the end of 1990. If the current level of effort is sustained and special efforts are directed at the remaining foci of infection, the eradication of the transmission of wild-type poliovirus from the Americas can be achieved. Continued external financial support will be critical if the effort is to succeed. The prospect of poliomyelitis eradication in the Americas led the 41st World Health Assembly of WHO to adopt a resolution in May, 1988, to eradicate the indigenous transmission of wild-type poliovirus from the world by the year 2000.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)