Bebidas de soja y salud femenina. Revisión de la evidencia y opinión de expertos / Soy beverages and women’s health: evidence review and experts opinion

Las bebidas vegetales de soja constituyen una alternativa dentro de la dieta habitual. Sin embargo, existe la preocupación de potenciales efectosen la salud reproductiva de la mujer por mecanismos de disrupción endócrina.En esta revisión se evalúan documentos científicos en el área de la Ginecología y la Obstetricia bajo el tamiz de la medicina basada en la evidencia,respondiendo preguntas estructuradas. La metodología se apegó a las guías establecidas por la declaración PRISMA 2020.Los estudios evaluados descartan un riesgo incrementado de pubertad precoz o cáncer de mama; incluso se aprecia un efecto protector frentea dicha neoplasia. Se ha reportado el paso transplacentario de isoflavonas de soja y su presencia en la leche materna, sin que ello implique unarelación con complicaciones materno-fetales o malformaciones congénitas. La exposición a productos de soja no parece influir sobre el pesocorporal y la salud ósea de la mujer.Los estudios en adultos indican que la soja favorece un mínimo incremento de tirotropina (TSH) en personas con antecedente de hipotiroidismosubclínico.El impacto de los alimentos basados en soja sobre la microbiota intestinal parece ser favorable para su diversidad, particularmente al consumirproductos fermentados.Muchos de los estudios en humanos han sido realizados con suplementos de isoflavonas o con productos que contienen proteínas aisladas otexturizadas de soja. Por tanto, los resultados y las conclusiones deben interpretarse con cautela ya que no son totalmente extrapolables a lasbebidas comerciales de soja. (AU)

Soy drinks are an increasingly consumed option within the Western diet. However, there are concerns about potential endocrine disruptor effectsand possible impact on women’s reproductive health.This review evaluates scientific documents in gynecology and obstetrics under an evidence-based medicine approach. All methods adhered toPRISMA 2020 declaration guidelines.The evaluated studies do not support a positive association between soy intake and early puberty or breast cancer; instead, a protective effectagainst such neoplasm was observed. Transplacental passage of soy isoflavones and their presence in breast milk has been reported withoutany maternal-fetal complications nor congenital malformations.Exposure to soy-derived products appears to have a neutral effect on body weight and bone health. Studies performed in adults indicate that soymay promote a minimal increase in thyrotropin (TSH) in subjects with subclinical hypothyroidism. The impact of soy-based foods on gut microbiotaappears favorable, especially when consuming fermented products.Many of the human studies have been conducted with isoflavones supplements, isolated or textured soy proteins. Therefore, the results andconclusions should be interpreted cautiously, as these are not entirely applicable to commercial soy beverages. (AU)

[Soy beverages and women's health: evidence review and experts opinion]. / Bebidas de soja y salud femenina. Revisión de la evidencia y opinión de expertos.

Introduction: Soy drinks are an increasingly consumed option within the Western diet. However, there are concerns about potential endocrine disruptor effects and possible impact on women's reproductive health. This review evaluates scientific documents in gynecology and obstetrics under an evidence-based medicine approach. All methods adhered to PRISMA 2020 declaration guidelines. The evaluated studies do not support a positive association between soy intake and early puberty or breast cancer; instead, a protective effect against such neoplasm was observed. Transplacental passage of soy isoflavones and their presence in breast milk has been reported without any maternal-fetal complications nor congenital malformations. Exposure to soy-derived products appears to have a neutral effect on body weight and bone health. Studies performed in adults indicate that soy may promote a minimal increase in thyrotropin (TSH) in subjects with subclinical hypothyroidism. The impact of soy-based foods on gut microbiota appears favorable, especially when consuming fermented products. Many of the human studies have been conducted with isoflavones supplements, isolated or textured soy proteins. Therefore, the results and conclusions should be interpreted cautiously, as these are not entirely applicable to commercial soy beverages.

Introducción: Las bebidas vegetales de soja constituyen una alternativa dentro de la dieta habitual. Sin embargo, existe la preocupación de potenciales efectos en la salud reproductiva de la mujer por mecanismos de disrupción endócrina. En esta revisión se evalúan documentos científicos en el área de la Ginecología y la Obstetricia bajo el tamiz de la medicina basada en la evidencia, respondiendo preguntas estructuradas. La metodología se apegó a las guías establecidas por la declaración PRISMA 2020. Los estudios evaluados descartan un riesgo incrementado de pubertad precoz o cáncer de mama; incluso se aprecia un efecto protector frente a dicha neoplasia. Se ha reportado el paso transplacentario de isoflavonas de soja y su presencia en la leche materna, sin que ello implique una relación con complicaciones materno-fetales o malformaciones congénitas. La exposición a productos de soja no parece influir sobre el peso corporal y la salud ósea de la mujer. Los estudios en adultos indican que la soja favorece un mínimo incremento de tirotropina (TSH) en personas con antecedente de hipotiroidismo subclínico. El impacto de los alimentos basados en soja sobre la microbiota intestinal parece ser favorable para su diversidad, particularmente al consumir productos fermentados. Muchos de los estudios en humanos han sido realizados con suplementos de isoflavonas o con productos que contienen proteínas aisladas o texturizadas de soja. Por tanto, los resultados y las conclusiones deben interpretarse con cautela ya que no son totalmente extrapolables a las bebidas comerciales de soja.

Edulcorantes no calóricos en la mujer en edad reproductiva: documento de consenso / Non-caloric sweeteners in women of reproductive age: a consensus document

Los edulcorantes no calóricos (ENC) son aditivos de alimentos que se utilizan para sustituir azúcares y potencialmente para reducir la ingesta energética. Existe un debate científico en torno a los beneficios reales de su uso. Los ENC son sustancias ampliamente evaluadas en la literatura científica. Su seguridad es revisada por las agencias regulatorias internacionales del campo de la salud. Los profesionales de la salud y los consumidores con frecuencia carecen de educación e información rigurosa, objetiva y sustentada en la evidencia científica y el juicio clínico sobre el uso de aditivos en los alimentos. Los ENC se han empleado como sustitutos de la sacarosa, en especial por las personas con diabetes mellitus y obesidad. Sin embargo, se han planteado inquietudes relacionadas con su posible asociación con el parto pretérmino y con su uso durante el embarazo y la lactancia, ante la posibilidad de consecuencias metabólicas o de otra índole en la madre o en el neonato. Este análisis de la evidencia en ginecología y obstetricia presenta una revisión que intenta responder a preguntas que habitualmente se hacen al respecto los profesionales de la salud y sus pacientes. En este documento se evalúan diversas publicaciones científicas bajo el tamiz de la medicina basada en la evidencia y del marco regulatorio para aditivos de alimentos con el fin dilucidar si el uso de ENC en las mujeres durante las etapas críticas del embarazo y la lactancia supone o no un posible riesgo

Non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) are food additives that have been used as a possible tool to reduce energy and sugar intake. There is a scientific debate around the real benefits of their use. NNS are substances widely evaluated in the scientific literature. Their safety is reviewed by international regulatory health agencies. Health professionals and consumers often lack education and objective information about food additives based on the best scientific evidence. NNS have been used as a substitute for sucrose, especially by people with diabetes mellitus and obesity. However, concerns related to their possible association with preterm birth have been raised, and also with their use during pregnancy and lactation because of the possibility of metabolic or other consequences in both the mother and offspring. This analysis of the evidence in gynecology and obstetrics presents a review of the most commonly asked questions regarding this matter by health professionals and their patients. This document evaluates a diversity of scientific publications under the sieve of evidence-based medicine and the regulatory framework for food additives to elucidate whether the use of NNS in women in these critical stages of pregnancy and breastfeeding represents a potential risk

[Non-caloric sweeteners in women of reproductive age - A consensus document]. / Edulcorantes no calóricos en la mujer en edad reproductiva: documento de consenso.

INTRODUCTION: Non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) are food additives that have been used as a possible tool to reduce energy and sugar intake. There is a scientific debate around the real benefits of their use. NNS are substances widely evaluated in the scientific literature. Their safety is reviewed by international regulatory health agencies. Health professionals and consumers often lack education and objective information about food additives based on the best scientific evidence. NNS have been used as a substitute for sucrose, especially by people with diabetes mellitus and obesity. However, concerns related to their possible association with preterm birth have been raised, and also with their use during pregnancy and lactation because of the possibility of metabolic or other consequences in both the mother and offspring. This analysis of the evidence in gynecology and obstetrics presents a review of the most commonly asked questions regarding this matter by health professionals and their patients. This document evaluates a diversity of scientific publications under the sieve of evidence-based medicine and the regulatory framework for food additives to elucidate whether the use of NNS in women in these critical stages of pregnancy and breastfeeding represents a potential risk.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Los edulcorantes no calóricos (ENC) son aditivos de alimentos que se utilizan para sustituir azúcares y potencialmente para reducir la ingesta energética. Existe un debate científico en torno a los beneficios reales de su uso. Los ENC son sustancias ampliamente evaluadas en la literatura científica. Su seguridad es revisada por las agencias regulatorias internacionales del campo de la salud. Los profesionales de la salud y los consumidores con frecuencia carecen de educación e información rigurosa, objetiva y sustentada en la evidencia científica y el juicio clínico sobre el uso de aditivos en los alimentos. Los ENC se han empleado como sustitutos de la sacarosa, en especial por las personas con diabetes mellitus y obesidad. Sin embargo, se han planteado inquietudes relacionadas con su posible asociación con el parto pretérmino y con su uso durante el embarazo y la lactancia, ante la posibilidad de consecuencias metabólicas o de otra índole en la madre o en el neonato. Este análisis de la evidencia en ginecología y obstetricia presenta una revisión que intenta responder a preguntas que habitualmente se hacen al respecto los profesionales de la salud y sus pacientes. En este documento se evalúan diversas publicaciones científicas bajo el tamiz de la medicina basada en la evidencia y del marco regulatorio para aditivos de alimentos con el fin dilucidar si el uso de ENC en las mujeres durante las etapas críticas del embarazo y la lactancia supone o no un posible riesgo.

Changes in circulating concentrations of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 and placental growth factor measured by automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassays methods are predictors of preeclampsia.

OBJECTIVE: Preeclampsia is characterized by an imbalance in angiogenic factors such as soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) and placental growth factor (PlGF). We herein assessed whether these factors measured by a newly developed automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay are associated with risk to develop preeclampsia. METHODS: We performed a nested case-control study within a cohort of 230 women with singleton pregnancies. The study included all 37 women who eventually developed preeclampsia and 29 normotensive controls. Serum samples were collected at 4-week intervals (from weeks 20th to 36th). sFlt-1 and PlGF were measured using a commercial automated immunoassay (Elecsys). RESULTS: Women destined to develop preeclampsia had lower PlGF levels and higher sFlt-1 levels and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio than women with normal pregnancies. These changes became significant at 20 weeks in women destined to develop early preeclampsia (<34 weeks, P  ≤  0.003), and at 24-28 weeks in women who later developed preeclampsia (P  ≤  0.024). The risk for developing preeclampsia was higher among women with PlGF concentration values in the lowest quartile or with sFlt-1 levels and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the highest quartile of the control distribution. The odds ratios were higher and appeared earlier in women destined to develop early preeclampsia than in women who presented preeclampsia later. The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was more tightly associated with risk of preterm or term preeclampsia than either angiogenic factor alone. CONCLUSION: Changes in circulating concentrations of PlGF, sFlt-1, and in the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio precede the onset of preeclampsia. The risk profile of circulating angiogenic factors for developing preeclampsia distinctly evolves depending on whether this condition is manifested at preterm or term.

[Pregnancy in patients with renal transplantation: maternal and fetal morbidity]. / Embarazo en pacientes con trasplante renal: morbilidad materna y fetal.

BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia is a multisystemic syndrome with unknown etiology and characterized by abnormal vascular placentation response. Patients with renal transplantation restore them fertility 10 months after the intervention. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate incidence of preeclampsia and maternal-perinatal outcome in patients with renal transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Comparative, observational and retrospective study performed in pregnant patients with renal transplantation, from December 1999 to April 2008 at Perinatology of Hypertensive Diseases Department of the Unidad Medica de Alta Especialidad de Ginecoobstetricia Luis Castelazo Ayala, IMSS. Davison' guide, descriptive statistic, and Fischer exact test were used. RESULTS: Thirty patients were analyzed, 27 cases satisfy Davison's recommended guidelines, and the rest did not achieve these criteria (p = 0.001). Preeclampsia occurred in 15 cases (50%), preterm delivery in 15 (50%), and fetal growth restriction in 6 (20%). Among the 11 patients with previous chronic hypertension, 8 developed superimposed preeclampsia (72%), and 9 had delivery before 37 weeks of gestation (82%). Malfunction of renal transplantation, before pregnancy, was associated with maternal and perinatal poor outcome (p = 0.006). There were no maternal deaths, but one perinatal (3%) CONCLUSIONS: Successful pregnancy is possible in patients with renal transplantation, however there is a high risk of preeclampsia, infection, and fetal growth restriction. Patients with renal transplantation must fulfill Davison's pre-pregnancy guidelines.

[Antiphospholipid syndrome and pregnancy]. / Sindrome antifosfolipídico asociado con embarazo.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the maternal and perinatal outcome of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A descriptive and retrospective analysis of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy was made from January 2000 to June 2005. RESULTS: We analyzed 35 patients. Primary and secondary antiphospholipid syndrome occurred in 25 (71%) and 10 (29%) women, respectively. Nine cases were associated with systemic lupus erythematosus and one with scleroderma. Approximately, 48% of women had history of thrombosis, 23% recurrent pregnancy loss, and 15% early onset preeclampsia in previous pregnancies. Twenty-seven patients had positive anticardiolipin antibodies, 6 lupus anticoagulant, and 2 both of them. About 80% of the patients were delivered by cesarean section. There was one spontaneous embryo loss before seven weeks. Eleven (32%) patients had preeclampsia. There were no maternal deaths. All women began treatment since the first trimester of pregnancy. Twenty-three patients (66%) received heparin and low dose aspirin, 8 cases (22%) heparin, low dose aspirin and prednisone, for presenting systemic lupus erythematosus, and the remaining 4 cases (12%) were treated with prednisone and aspirin. Ninety four percent of the cases got a live newborn. There were two neonatal deaths secondary to extreme prematurity and associated with preeclampsia. There was one fetal death related to maternal lupus renal activity. Fifty-eight percent of the newborns were premature. Intrauterine growth restriction was present in 20% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Early treatment combined with close maternal-fetal surveillance was associated with a 90% chance of a live birth rate. However, prematurity, preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction were common.

Vaginal matrix metalloproteinase levels in pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-8 and MMP-9 levels in the vaginal secretions of pregnant women with or without asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis (BV). METHODS: In this study, vaginal levels and molecular forms of MMP-8 and MMP-9 were studied in 36 pregnant women between 28 and 34 weeks of gestation with asymptomatic BV and 41 pregnant women, matched for gestational age, without BV. RESULTS: Vaginal MMP-8 concentrations were significantly higher (P = .023) in BV-positive women. There was no significant difference in MMP-9 levels between healthy pregnant controls and BV-positive pregnant women. The presence of MMP-8 was confirmed by a 38-kd band on Western blots. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that BV is associated with increased levels of MMP-8 in vaginal fluid. Increased production of collagen-degrading enzymes such as MMP-8 is a possible cause of spontaneous preterm delivery in pregnant women with asymptomatic BV.

[Usefulness of fetal biophysical profile in preterm rupture of membranes with treatment]. / Utilidad del perfil biofísico fetal en la rotura prematura de membranas pretérmino con tratamiento.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of the fetal biophysical profile as a predictor of early neonatal infection in patients with preterm rupture of membranes in conservative management. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a validation study of a diagnostic test. Between November, 2001 and August, 2003, 75 patients with 27 to 33 weeks of gestation and preterm rupture of membranes in conservative management were studied. Daily, a fetal biophysical profile was applied to them. Statistical analysis was done with chi square test and with a 2 x 2 contingency table that compared the biophysical score of + 8 and < or = 6 versus the presence or absence of early neonatal infection. RESULTS: The biophysical score < or = 6 was associated with early neonatal infection (p < 0.05), with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 80, 85, 64 and 85%, respectively (OR 9.73, 95% CI: 2.88-34.63; p = 0.0000164). CONCLUSIONS: The biophysical score < or = 6 was significantly associated with early neonatal infection.

[Economical impact of preterm delivery management based on fetal fibronectin results]. / Impacto económico del manejo del parto pretérmino con base en el resultado de fibronectina fetal.

BACKGROUND: Preterm labor continues to be the first cause (after congenital malformations) of morbidity and mortality during the perinatal period. One of the markers showing the highest sensitivity to predict preterm labor seems to be fetal fibronectin (fFN) determined in the cervicovaginal secretion. OBJECTIVES: To identify patients at risk of preterm labor based on the presence of fFN in cervicovaginal secretions and to analyze the cost-benefit of medical attention and hospital stay depending on the fFN results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four hundred and sixty two patients were admitted in a 6 month period to the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Department. All of them had symptoms of preterm labor. Their gestational ages were between 24 and 34 weeks, the fFN analyses were taken from cervical vaginal secretion. One hundred and fifty eight were fFN positive and 304 were negative. Patients with positive fFN were hospitalized and received specific treatment for preterm labor. The patients with negative fFN were sent home with no medical treatment. In order to calculate the economic impact of the hospital's medical attention we considered the total cost in pesos which included patient's hospital care when admitted with preterm labor symptoms, hospital stay, and neonatal attention. The total costs were compared and analyzed in the two groups. RESULTS: The average cost generated for fFN positive and negative patients was 23,059 and 7,859 pesos, respectively. Approximately 15,200 pesos were saved per patient in this group. Multiplying this amount among patients with negative fFN (n=304), we would have saved 4,620,000 pesos in a 6 month period. Our established medical management did not affect negatively maternal-fetal well being. For statistical purposes of variables the Mann Whitney U, chi square and McNemar's tests were calculated. CONCLUSION: By determining fFN for the diagnosis of preterm labor, we obtained savings of 4,620,000 pesos in a 6 month period avoiding unnecessary treatments and hospital stay in patients with negative fFN. Determination of fFN in cervical vaginal secretion in patients with symptoms of preterm labor showed to have high sensitivity and specificity in predicting preterm labor between 24-34 weeks of gestation, permitting a more rational use of medical management and resources and avoiding unnecessary treatments. The treatment instituted on the basis of an opportune diagnosis in patients with positive fFN showed to prolong weeks of gestation. Although a persistence of morbidity and mortality of prematurity has been reported, these have diminished in comparison with studies previously done in the institution.